who have been impeached. And that means impeached forever.
Hello Everybody,
The Senate conducted its trial, and the verdict is in.
Although the impartial jurors decided not to convict and
remove the president from office, it also failed to give
him what he so dearly wanted. By choosing not to allow
documents and/or witnesses, the impartial jururs left it
all up to the people to decide rather than themselves.
That means NO ACQUITTAL for the president. He remains
impeached forever, with the people deciding the case this
coming November.
who have been impeached. And that means impeached forever.
But where's the importance? I got fired for drinking on the job. Am I a
lousy drunk "forever?"
When I'm 80, and I apply for a job as a newspaper delivery driver, are they
gonna say "You're a lousy drunk - forever!?"
Most Trump fans are devoted to him - we need him to do something that we
consider to be "really bad" for us to want him removed.
If Obama did what Trump did, I wouldn't want Obama impeached for it either.
The Senate conducted its trial, and the verdict is in.
Although the impartial jurors decided not to convict and
remove the president from office, it also failed to give
him what he so dearly wanted. By choosing not to allow
documents and/or witnesses, the impartial jururs left it
all up to the people to decide rather than themselves.
That means NO ACQUITTAL for the president. He remains
impeached forever, with the people deciding the case this
coming November.
But he was acquitted, if it makes yourself feel better by telling yourself
that he wasn't it, then ok then, but he was in reality acquitted.
Most Trump fans are devoted to him - we need him to do something that we
consider to be "really bad" for us to want him removed.
Defending the US Constitution and Rule of Law would do that.
Lee Lofaso wrote to All <=-
That means NO ACQUITTAL for the president. He remains
impeached forever, with the people deciding the case this
coming November.
Most Trump fans are devoted to him - we need him to do something
that we consider to be "really bad" for us to want him removed.
Defending the US Constitution and Rule of Law would do that.
This would be appealing to be uptight law professors, but try explaining
that to conservative voting-card holders who only care about the good
things that are in front of their faces, like the economy, a president
who's actively getting other states off America's nipple, and a wall that's being built to protect poor people from dangerous illegal immigrants.
That means NO ACQUITTAL for the president. He remains
impeached forever, with the people deciding the case this
coming November.
And didn't I say that the Lefties would do exactly this: Ignore the results
and still claim that Trump is in the wrong.
Leo: Since you didn't bother to look it up, I did a quick Google check for
you.
Acquit: Verb. Free (someone) from a criminal charge by a verdict of not
guilty.
The Senate said "not guilty", therefore Trump was acquitted. Discussion
closed.
That means that Trump is still your president today.
And guess what? After Nervous Nancy's performance of ripping up the State
of the Union Speech, Democrats were calling in to C-SPAN saying that they will never vote Democrat again. So Trump will still be your president for the next 4 years.
Be that as it may, he remains impeached forever, and not acquitted.
Lee Lofaso wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-
What was he acquitted of? That is the point Sen. Hirono was
making. Since no documents and/or witnesses were allowed, there
was nothing to acquit him of. Therefore, the trial was rigged.
Ergo, no acquittal.
Unlike Richard Nixon, who won the presidential election fair
and square without any help from Russia or Vietnam or any other
country, Donald Trump is an illegitimate president as he is
known to have been put in office with help from Russia.
Be that as it may, he remains impeached forever, and not acquitted.
Even after he leaves office he will remain impeached forever, and
not acquitted. After he is dead and gone, his remains either buried
or cremated, he will remain impeached forever, and not acquitted.
What's he gonna do? Have his "base" repeat chants of "Lock her up!"?
More likely this coming January the world will be waking up
to America's first LBGTQ+P president ... with the Rainbow House
playing in the background.
Lee Lofaso wrote to Gregory Deyss <=-
US Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI) was there. I quoted her words.
And I am sure she meant every word she said. "He wasn't acquitted.
It was a rigged trial. You don't get acquitted when you don't even
get to call witnesses or have the documents because the president stonewalled all efforts on the part of the House to get the
information they requested. So, there you go. It was a rigged
trial."
Lee Lofaso wrote to aaron thomas <=-
The president is no conservative,
Be that as it may, he remains impeached forever, and not acquitted.
You and Nancy should sell "Impeached Forever" t-shirts!
And none of the Dem candidates are Liberals. Which is why classical Liberals have been moving to the Republican party.
If JFK were around today, he'd be a Republican because his positions
would have nothing to do with the Dems of today.
*LAUGH* No Democratic candicates are electable. That's why the Dems are panicing right now.
They should put "Failed Impeachment Managers Forever" on their resumes!
folded, father and son parting ways over discussions related to Trump.
Is that all worth it?
resumesThey should put "Failed Impeachment Managers Forever" on their
To me it seems that Trump was successfully impeached ...
Perhaps you don't understand what "impeachment" stands for...
Be that as it may, he remains impeached forever, and not acquitted.
You and Nancy should sell "Impeached Forever" t-shirts!
What was he acquitted of? That is the point Sen. Hirono was
making. Since no documents and/or witnesses were allowed, there
was nothing to acquit him of. Therefore, the trial was rigged.
Ergo, no acquittal.
More weasel words. If he wasn't aquitted, then he wasn't impeached.
Unlike Richard Nixon, who won the presidential election fair
and square without any help from Russia or Vietnam or any other >LL>country, Donald Trump is an illegitimate president as he is
known to have been put in office with help from Russia.
More Leftie BS. Show the proof. Oh, wait... There isn't any.
It's just sour grapes from the Left because their criminal candidate
couldn't cheat her way into the White House.
Be that as it may, he remains impeached forever, and not acquitted. >LL>Even after he leaves office he will remain impeached forever, and
not acquitted. After he is dead and gone, his remains either buried
or cremated, he will remain impeached forever, and not acquitted.
Do your Leftie controllers tell you what to say?
Because I hear the exact same words from the other Leftie crazies who are
mad because they didn't get their way (again).
What's he gonna do? Have his "base" repeat chants of "Lock her up!"?
No. He'll collect the evidence, then press charges and, hopefully, put her
in jail where she belongs.
That's unlike the Left who simply accuse with no evidence and then say "we
won because he will be accused forever".
More likely this coming January the world will be waking up
to America's first LBGTQ+P president ... with the Rainbow House
playing in the background.
*LAUGH* No Democratic candicates are electable. That's why the Dems are
panicing right now.
US Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI) was there. I quoted her words.
And I am sure she meant every word she said. "He wasn't acquitted.
It was a rigged trial. You don't get acquitted when you don't even
get to call witnesses or have the documents because the president >LL>stonewalled all efforts on the part of the House to get the
information they requested. So, there you go. It was a rigged
trial."
*LAUGH*
I saw that and I swear I pictured Jimmy Durnate saying "What elephant?"
(If you don't know the reference, look it up on You Tube.)
Hirono is just another example of how delusional the Dems are.
The president is no conservative,
And none of the Dem candidates are Liberals.
Which is why classical Liberals have been moving to the Republican party.
If JFK were around today, he'd be a Republican because his positions would
have nothing to do with the Dems of today.
Is there nothing more uplifting to talk about ?
To me it seems that Trump was successfully impeached ...
Perhaps you don't understand what "impeachment" stands for...
On 02-12-20 11:44, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Ward Dossche about Re: Not Acquitted <=-
They successfully made a mountain out of a fistful of dirt, but failed
to get a conviction.
However, they were "successful" at getting at least 2 men fired,
wasting a ton of time, and a ton of money. Did the Vindmans really need that nonsense?
To me it seems that Trump was successfully impeached ...
Are you sure?
Perhaps you don't understand what "impeachment" stands for...
Maybe the DEMS and the people who were and who are currently claiming to
understand impeachment, do not understand why, constitutionally it failed.
The Articles were not even a crime nor were any laws broken.
It is also because of the U.S. Constitution that the President was DUTY
bound
to make the inquiry into corruption that is Quid Pro Quo Joe, who said fire >the prosecutor who is investing my zero experience in natural gas and oil
son
Hunter, or else you don't get the billion. (was which from the American-Tax >Payer.) - which is why, it is deemed as corruption in the first place.
No one truely expected that the Senate would vote to convict, but at
Lee Lofaso wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-
More weasel words. If he wasn't aquitted, then he wasn't impeached.
He was impeached.
It is one of those things that cannot
be taken back. Once impeached, always impeached. It becomes
a permanent stain that can never be removed. Once a person
has been tagged, it is tagged forever.
Carter did not call Trump a "criminal candidate". He merely
said Trump is an "illegitmate" president. Big difference. Even
if Trump is a [unconvicted] criminal.
Mitt Romney is one of those "Leftie crazies"? Last I heard
he was a Republican in good standing. Even if he is the last
Republican standing.
Like the unfounded allegations concerning the Bidens? My, my.
That is going to be a long wait.
How long as Donald Trump been
collecting evidence on Hillary Clinton? Since 2016 and still
hasn't found a thing?
No evidence has been found of the Bidens "corruption" in Ukraine.
It is all bogus. Totally made up nonsense.
According to the latest polls, all of the contenders for the
Democratic nomination are ahead in a head-to-head match-up against
Trump.
More weasel words. If he wasn't aquitted, then he wasn't impeached.
He was impeached.
Then he was acquitted.
It is one of those things that cannot
be taken back. Once impeached, always impeached. It becomes
a permanent stain that can never be removed. Once a person
has been tagged, it is tagged forever.
*Laugh* Keep telling that to yourself if it makes you feel better.
Carter did not call Trump a "criminal candidate". He merely
said Trump is an "illegitmate" president. Big difference. Even
if Trump is a [unconvicted] criminal.
"Illegitimate" president has no meaning.
The words "legitimate" and "illegitimate" do not appear in the Constitution.
So this is just more Leftie weasel words.
Mitt Romney is one of those "Leftie crazies"? Last I heard
he was a Republican in good standing. Even if he is the last >LL>Republican standing.
He's a RINO. But we'll see what his constitutents think of his actions when
he's up for election. He'll probably meet the same fate as Amash.
Like the unfounded allegations concerning the Bidens? My, my.
So.... You are saying that Hunter Biden didn't go to work for Burisma while
Dad Joe was VP?
That is going to be a long wait.
Based on how paniced the Dems are right now, not that long a wait.
How long as Donald Trump been collecting evidence on Hillary LL>Clinton?Since 2016 and still hasn't found a thing?
So... You are denying that Hilary deleted emails and such?
Are you telling me that Comey commited perjury while testifying before
congress? Because he said that she did all those things.
She just didn't do them "on purpose" so there was no "criminal intent".
But they were still done. So we haven't "found a thing"?
No evidence has been found of the Bidens "corruption" in Ukraine.
It is all bogus. Totally made up nonsense.
Then why are the Dems hiding Hunter?
Why are they trying to block the investigation into Hunter's Ukraine
dealings?
If it's totally made up, why are they trying to hide everything?
According to the latest polls, all of the contenders for the
Democratic nomination are ahead in a head-to-head match-up against >LL>Trump.
You need to stop watching Leftie polls. Your echo chamber will only tell
you what you want to hear.
Lee Lofaso wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-
He was impeached by the House.
The Senate failed to convict and remove him from office.
That is not the same as acquittal.
I don't have to. He has already been tagged. Although he may
be tagged again. And again. And again. Until the Senate finally
decides to act to convict and remove him from office.
It makes Donald J. Trump a real bastard. And a true son of a bitch.
Then who or what is a "legitimate" president? Hopefully one elected
by "we the people" rather than one selected by Russia (or Vladimir
Putin).
Yes, we use an electoral college process in order to determine
who our president is, or should be. But when that process has been
hacked by a foreign power in order to install someone of their choice, that makes the individual selected an "illegitimate" president.
Don't make me laugh. Romney is from Utah. When is the last time
a Democrat won a statewide race for whatever office in Utah?
Hunter Biden is a lawyer, the same as his father. He practices
law for a living, the same as most other lawyers. I never knew that
was a crime, or why being a lawyer might even be considered as being
a crime. I'll bet he paid his taxes for the work he did, and is
not afraid to show it.
Like I said, he looked into it. She told him the truth. He
believed her. After all, she was an honest politician, and would
never lie. Not to him, anyway.
So she wasn't or isn't the smartest cookie in the world ...
The Russians did it. Or maybe the Russians made her do it?
Either way, those emails are long gone ...
making people support Trump even more. So, please, try to impeach him again. It's good for everyone other than the Dems.
He was impeached by the House.
The Senate failed to convict and remove him from office.
That is not the same as acquittal.
Yes, it is. By definition of the word "acquit".
Or do you also want to change the meaning of words to match your narrative?
I don't have to. He has already been tagged. Although he may
be tagged again. And again. And again. Until the Senate finally >LL>decides to act to convict and remove him from office.
I really hope that the Dems do that.
The whole impeachment circus backfired completely on the Dems,
driving more and more people away and making people support Trump even more.
So, please, try to impeach him again.
It's good for everyone other than the Dems.
It makes Donald J. Trump a real bastard. And a true son of a bitch.
That may be, but he's your president today and will probably be your
president for another 4 years.
Then who or what is a "legitimate" president? Hopefully one elected
by "we the people" rather than one selected by Russia (or Vladimir >LL>Putin).
That's for you to define.
You are the one using terms like "illigitimate".
Yes, we use an electoral college process in order to determine
who our president is, or should be. But when that process has been >LL>hacked by a foreign power in order to install someone of their choice, >LL>that makes the individual selected an "illegitimate" president.
The Left's "Russia!" narrative has been long debunked.
Only the Lefties still hold on to it as an excuse as to why a criminal
(Hilary) didn't garner wide support.
Don't make me laugh. Romney is from Utah. When is the last time
a Democrat won a statewide race for whatever office in Utah?
Didn't say a Dem was going to win. Just not Romney.
Hunter Biden is a lawyer, the same as his father. He practices
law for a living, the same as most other lawyers. I never knew that >LL>was a crime, or why being a lawyer might even be considered as being
a crime. I'll bet he paid his taxes for the work he did, and is
not afraid to show it.
Then why are the Dems resisting showing Hunter's taxes? Where is Hunter,
BTW?
And you still didn't answer the question:
Why did a Urkraine company hire Hunter, who had know knowledge in their
business, for all that money while his dad was VP?
At best, this is a conflict of interest.
If it was all innocent, then the Bidens shouldn't have a problem showing
that.
But they are resisting. That implies that it was not innocent.
Like I said, he looked into it. She told him the truth. He
believed her. After all, she was an honest politician, and would
never lie. Not to him, anyway.
A Clinton "honest"? Never happens.
Hilary created a private email server for her official use - in violation of
Federal law. She had emails, servers, phones destroyed AFTER she was told
to produce the information - in violation of Federal law.
Yes, Comey "forgave" her. But he didn't have the ability to do that.
He only said that he found no "criminal intent", which was a joke since the
whole thing stank to high Heaven of criminal intent.
In Comey's defence, he most likely didn't want to die mysteriously (since
that happens very frequently to people who testify against the Clintons).
So he was probably acting out of self-preservation.
So she wasn't or isn't the smartest cookie in the world ...
*LAUGH*
Are you seriously telling me that someone who was Secretary of State didn't
know what was in Federal Law?
Are you seriously saying that she "didn't know" that setting up a personal
server for official use was illegal?
Are you seriously saying that she destroyed all those emails "by accident"?
Dale was right. Serious TDS here.
The Russians did it. Or maybe the Russians made her do it?
Either way, those emails are long gone ...
"The Devil made me do it" hasn't been an acceptable excuse for a long, long
time now.
Be that as it may, he remains impeached forever, and not acquitted.
You and Nancy should sell "Impeached Forever" t-shirts!
I'd say Trump is a Republican because it suited his chances of getting WD>elected better than if he would join the Democrats where he probably WD>wouldn't have made the ticket ... plus he had an axe to grind with Obama.
With what I know of US politics is that "4 more years" is a reality as in WD>the current state of affairs I don't see what the Democrats are going to WD>come-up with. Sanders is going to succomb to a heart-attack soon enough, WD>Mayor Pete is unelectable on national level, Biden's campaign is going to WD>die a silent death and the rest ... ?
Is there nothing more uplifting to talk about ?
They should put "Failed Impeachment Managers Forever" on their resumes!
To me it seems that Trump was successfully impeached ...
Perhaps you don't understand what "impeachment" stands for...
Lee Lofaso wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-
He was impeached by the House.
The Senate failed to convict and remove him from office.
That is not the same as acquittal.
decides to act to convict and remove him from office.
I really hope that the Dems do that. The whole impeachment circus RL>backfired completely on the Dems, driving more and more people away and RL>making people support Trump even more. So, please, try to impeach him RL>again. It's good for everyone other than the Dems.
It makes Donald J. Trump a real bastard. And a true son of a bitch.
BTW.... the crack cocaine industry starrted right in the middle of her district!
TIM RICHARDSON wrote to AARON THOMAS <=-
You and Nancy should sell "Impeached Forever" t-shirts!
Somewhere, somebody will. Count on it!
TIM RICHARDSON wrote to WARD DOSSCHE <=-
Perhaps you don't understand what "impeachment" stands for...
Do `you' understand what NOT GUILTY means?
BTW.... the crack cocaine industry starrted right in the middle of her district!
That's her biggest achievement so far.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 371 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 174:35:36 |
Calls: | 7,915 |
Files: | 12,983 |
Messages: | 5,797,649 |