Windows 95 used to reside to be called up when called for... now
that's been taken off, and Linux put in to replace it...
I just need it to work
Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 22-May-2019 01:45 <=-
Windows 95 used to reside to be called up when called for... now
that's been taken off, and Linux put in to replace it...
Most people I know around here that made the switch did so when win2k first reared it's ugly head and thus win98 would have been the windows representative on whatever multiboot system they had at the time.
Lilo was the main one back then.
I am not sure what version of windows is the choice these days.
Also I never did windows not even back in the Win95 days ... or win3.1 while we're at it. I did have 5.25" boot floppies for Win2.0 but
they'd only boot on a 286 which is just as well as even then I did say (and I quote), "Nobody will ever buy this."
It's Win10....
Lots of suckers did... and still do.... ;)
Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 24-May-2019 16:13 <=-
I just took a peak at what's being offered as far as preinstalled
systems go and it appears Win10 is the top choice. I've never seen it
in action. Most people here only have smartphones and/or tablets and
for the mostpart Android is the usual suspect on those. One
Chromebook and one Mac book or whatever they're calling them these days.
Not counting myself only one other neighbour has a reqular
computer and he uses linux, and has since he met me. I think his motivation was to beat me at the linux game - whatever that is - but I think somewhere along the line he realized that we're on totally
different paths as far as what uses a computer has to offer. I tend
to be more of a networking/hacker type than he is and he tends to
stick to the more 'popular' uses such as digital photography and the
such. I am more of a networking/server type and as we speak I have
three tiny lowpower systems including the raspi I am typing this reply
on as well as two wireless access points I am customizing for those
who want to use them for whatever is wanted at the moment. As far as
I know that is probably Facebook and/or YouTube given any
conversations I have with the neighbours about wireless access.
All three are pure linux. My main toy is also linux and I use that
for my own purposes, mostly to play around with ideas I might have.
Lots of suckers did... and still do.... ;)
I think I was right about 2.0 though. What I failed to see was that
it had a future. Beats me why.
Richard has one laptop with Win10 installed
Still not what I'd want for my own computer
And linux seems to work well across the board...
any more than I am of watching TV
And it seems linux works very well for you...
Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 30-May-2019 20:46 <=-
Still not what I'd want for my own computerUnderstood. For me the keyboard was the deal breaker. I'd have to
remap some of the keys to get console switching to work ... if indeed
I could customize a bootable linux for it to start with. The only
things in it's favour - the Chromebook that reared it's ugly head here
- was the cpu and 8G of ram but that is readily duplicated in other similar devices.
And linux seems to work well across the board...It most certainly can. Even fidonet. :-)
And it seems linux works very well for you...No doubt about it and has so since near the beginning mostly due to
gcc and friends which was my initial attraction. Downloadable kernel source has kept me a true believer. Much fun has been had
experimenting with oddball hardware over the years such as making
bootable compactflash disks just before the turn of the century. That
is what led me to where I am today although I haven't seen or used a compactflash disk since. However on this particular machine I am
booting up a microSD card which is basically the same thing and the OS
did evolve from the compactflash idea from way back when. "Flash
ttylinux of the 21st Century" came out of that idea circa 2001-ish. :-)
I've never done anything with a Chromebook...
I know quite a few that are using linux for various things
You've kept yourself busy there...
Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 02-Jun-2019 20:14 <=-
I've never done anything with a Chromebook...
Just as well methinks. Offhand I am guessing the laptop you already
use is probably WAY better given your usage for such things.
As for me the keyboard is the main deal breaker but the installed OS leaves MUCH to be desired.
I know quite a few that are using linux for various things
It is the best thing going, although I'd have to admit most of the distributions have wandered far afield from what attracted me to linux
way back when and are reminisant of - dare I say it? - Windows. :::shudder:::
You've kept yourself busy there...
Yes I have but have mellowed out in my old age and have gotten (too?) comfortable enjoying the fruits of past labours.
Nothing really wrong with gui, as long as one can still use just
the keyboard
you keep finding new things to play with anyway...
Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 07-Jun-2019 04:13 <=-
Nothing really wrong with gui, as long as one can still use just
the keyboard
Near as I can tell only the touchpad seems to do anything, and
anything isn't of much significance, or at least nothing of interest
to me. I really don't care much for surfing and/or streaming and that appeared to be most of what it's capabilities are geared towards via
the default chrome browser thingy.
you keep finding new things to play with anyway...
Actually more along the lines of making newfangled do same old, same
old. Multi-console bash shells are where it's at and in this one on
the raspberry pi looks strangely like vi doing fidonet.
Hmmm ... I wonder how that happened. ;-)
wouldn't be particularly of any use or interest to me either
Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 11-Jun-2019 04:22 <=-
wouldn't be particularly of any use or interest to me either
I'd be surprised if it was. I didn't notice a text editor and if
there is then I doubt it would be a micro-emacs clone. I think I read somewhere that there is a vim port for chromebooks but don't quote me
on that ... not that it really matters one way or the other.
like installing emacs and other useful things...
Not likely that we'd be searching it out otherwise
Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 14-Jun-2019 02:42 <=-
like installing emacs and other useful things...
Good luck with that. I've heard rumours about emacs on chromebooks
but have never seen evidence, up to including finding a link to a
valid site where it could be obtained. Just rumours, not even a screenshot. I have serious doubts.
Not likely that we'd be searching it out otherwise
Understood. Like I say above, nothing but rumours with no to
extremely little evidence to back it up. I am guessing it would take
a mess of hacking to get anything decent running ... not unlike what I
did on this raspi thingy I am calling aarch64-raspi3b+-linux-gnu. No emacs though but I think I could probably pull it off if it meant anything. For sure there is vi. :-)
Maube if/when I get bored I'll check it out and see if I can get a 64
bit ARM version of emacs working on this little guy.
I left town on the 14th of June, put 1400 miles on the car, got
home on the 21st....
Don't need screenshots... just need to try installing and see
what happens.
And I see that apparently you got bored soon after... that, or
curious.... ;)
However symlinking libcurses.so to libncurses.so would probably work
as well ... unless of course libcurses is already onboard and then the Makefile should work without modification.
i never have understood the difference between curses and ncurses
other than one starts with the letter 'n'...
i never have understood the difference between curses and ncurses
other than one starts with the letter 'n'...
The 'n' in ncurses stands for new, where new was back in 1993. Obviously new in this case is relative to BSD curses from back in 1980-1982-ish depending on which curses is considered as the base curses that all other curses evolved from, including ncurses.
Probably a more traditional micro emacs would link to -ltermcap
instead of -lcurses except that as we speak I don't have termcap installed. How about you?
BBSes...Probably a more traditional micro emacs would link to -ltermcap
instead of -lcurses except that as we speak I don't have termcap
installed. How about you?
i think i have it installed on one or two VMs but they're running
Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 29-Jun-2019 16:01 <=-
I left town on the 14th of June, put 1400 miles on the car, got
home on the 21st....
I stayed put but did manage to accomplish a few things during that
time.
Don't need screenshots... just need to try installing and see
what happens.
That sounds like a plan. If I can be of any assistance let me know.
And I see that apparently you got bored soon after... that, or
curious.... ;)
Mostly curious. I had to use the git version as well as edit the
Makefile to suit the target machines. So far it runs on aarch64-raspi3b+-linux-gnu, which is this machine I am typing to you
on, as well as x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Both of these targets have the -lncurses dependency rather than the -lcurses dependency so the fix
was easy;
sed -i 's/-lcurses/-lncurses/' Makefile
However symlinking libcurses.so to libncurses.so would probably work
as well ... unless of course libcurses is already onboard and then the Makefile should work without modification.
But I do understand that you have Emacs working on two different
machines, now... :)
Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 15-Jul-2019 14:53 <=-
But I do understand that you have Emacs working on two different
machines, now... :)
The test file created and displayed utf8 characters. Does your Emacs
do that? ;-)
but that might just as likely be the overall system I have... :)
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 371 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 174:16:39 |
Calls: | 7,915 |
Files: | 12,983 |
Messages: | 5,797,641 |