on. I figured it was a relatively stable job with good pay
and benefits, but the hiring process was pretty extreme
with I.Q. and Psyche tests required. I later heard back
from them and was told that I was not suited for the job
because I'd scored too high on the I.Q. tests.
I think they are factoring in likelyhood of turnaround with
>that one. If the candidate scores higher, that probably means
>they will get disatisfied with the job sooner and quit, which
>would cost the company downtime and expense to hire a
>replacement.
Yes, they actually mentioned that at the time. I don't know if
I would have been able to do a simple job all day for years or
not. Maybe I could and I'd have more challenging things I'd get
into after work. At the time a reliable paycheque and good
benefits sounded great to me. I figure you don't have to like
your job, and probably the number of people who do are in the
minority of workers. Most I think just do their jobs and can't
wait to get out of there at the end of the day.
That said, virually all jobs I've ever had that lasted for any
length of time, I usually ended up being moved or promoted into
a different job before too long, and usually the new position
was more challenging.
---
* SLMR Rob * Strive to be politically perfect, not just correct
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)