I am working on setting up my Telegard system as a point off my Renegade setup. Is there anything special I have to do in the D'Bridge host to
set it up as a point? I was going through the docs and didn't see much.
I got this message twice ...
PATH: 387/28 396/45 280/464 292/854
PATH: 387/28 396/45 261/38 640/1321 1384 633/280 229/426 292/854
I got this message twice ...
PATH: 387/28 396/45 280/464 292/854
PATH: 387/28 396/45 261/38 640/1321 1384 633/280 229/426 292/854
PATH: 387/28 396/45 280/464 292/854
PATH: 387/28 396/45 261/38 640/1321 1384 633/280 229/426 292/854
Not sure, but I may or may not have had a crash of D'Bridge at the time I sent this.
I would say the absence of a MSGID will make a number of systems en-route
So is it the mailer or the BBS that handles MSGIDs?
I would say the absence of a MSGID will make a number of systemsen-route
So is it the mailer or the BBS that handles MSGIDs?
So is it the mailer or the BBS that handles MSGIDs?
So is it the mailer or the BBS that handles MSGIDs?
I would say the tosser...
So is it the mailer or the BBS that handles MSGIDs?
I would say the tosser...
Many tossers use MSGIDs as part of their echomail duplicate detection,
but they are normally generated/inserted by the software that creates
the message.
I would say the absence of a MSGID will make a number of systems AG> WD> en-ro
So is it the mailer or the BBS that handles MSGIDs?
Normally a MSGID is inserted by the software that creates the message, whe it be a BBS, a SysOp editor like GoldED or MsgEd, or a utility program suc those that post text files in FTN message bases. For more details, consul FTS-0009. (http://ftsc.org/docs/fts-0009.001)
Andrew
So is it the mailer or the BBS that handles MSGIDs?
MSGID/REPLYID should be done by the BBS.
MSGID/REPLYID should be done by the BBS.
Wrong layer .... if you ask me.
Wrong layer .... if you ask me.
The answer is specific to his question. He is running a BBS and its not possible for his tosser to add a REPLYID given his setup. There is no othe layer, the only place it can work at all would be if his BBS does it.
MSGID/REPLYID should be done by the BBS.
Wrong layer .... if you ask me.
The answer is specific to his question. He is running a BBS and its not possible for his tosser to add a REPLYID given his setup. There is no other layer, the only place it can work at all would be if his BBS does
it.
Fidonet is not about BBSs though BBSs can use it to link-up. Hence my
The original question was "So is it the mailer or the BBS that handles MSGIDs?"
(Fidonet was absolutely created with the sole purpose of networking bulletin board systems together. I was there. It has evolved since then but that was its entire purpose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FidoNet)
The original question was "So is it the mailer or the BBS that
handles MSGIDs?"
MSGID/REPLYID does not come from the mailer.
Are your Dutch relatives causing you headaches again ?
Second, I don't know what "I was there" means because I only see a James Coyle listed for 42 days in 2001 and then your current nodenumber since March 2013. Unless you're one of Janis' secret friends ...
Please read what is said originally ... "handles" ... That means the
MSGID is already there ... i.e. how will an existing MSGID be dealt with.
My original net hasn't existed for decades, which really should be common sense. I spent a total of maybe 60 seconds to Google "old FidoNet nodelist" and immediately found one from 1994 with me in:
https://happy.kiev.ua/pub/nodelist/old/nodelist/1994/nodelist.063
Hopefully he'll be able to distinguish between the person who understands the technology from the person who jumps into other people's
conversations just to create arguments! This isn't on topic here anyway.
Actually, there is no James Coyle in there. If that Jim Coyle is you,
then fine but you cannot blame me for not finding any James Coyle.
BTW, it would look a lot better if you stopped calling yourself "g00r00"
I didn't blame you for anything.
If it repels people who have nothing better to do then to project their
own misery all over Fidonet for no reason, then I'd say it serves its purpose quite well!
I didn't blame you for anything.
Cut the semantics ... a rose by any other name still is a rose.
I did correct you with proof when you said I was lying about my
"FidoNet creds"
I did correct you with proof when you said I was lying about my "FidoNet creds"
What proof? There is no James Coyle in the nodelist you gave the link for...
That person with the same name from the same town with the same address
who ran a BBS with the same name is NOT me, and is obviously someone
else. Clearly thats the conclusion that a reasonable sane person would come to after viewing that nodelist!
I did correct you with proof when you said I was lying about my
"FidoNet creds"
What proof? There is no James Coyle in the nodelist you gave the link
for...
Ahh yes...
That person with the same name from the same town with the same address who
ran a BBS with the same name is NOT me, and is obviously someone else.
Ahh yes...
You're better off leaving it alone my good man. These are the same people that police the nodelist (and yes, they actually made an echo for it) because they have nothing better to do besides argue with others until whatever conversation they decide to jump into abruptly goes silent due
to others not wanting to stoop to their level. Fidonet at it's finest.
There is no person with the same name. There are 3 persons with the last name Coyle in that list, but all list a different Town then your
currently listed Philadelphia. And there are no addresses in the
nodelist (so we can't compare those). And there was no system with the name "Mystic BBS Support" in that nodelist. Have you even looked at that nodelist? You are not making any sense...
You're better off leaving it alone my good man. These are the same
people that police the nodelist (and yes, they actually made an echo for it) because they have nothing better to do besides argue with others
until whatever conversation they decide to jump into abruptly goes
silent due to others not wanting to stoop to their level. Fidonet at
it's finest.
Anyway, yeah. This echo should be cowbell-only. Lets hope they'll keep th
D'Bridge has a Cowbell feature, in fact a few hooks to allow playing of audio files on personal mail. So naturally I *expect* you to "one up" me every time I publish an update... lol.
Any reasonable person
would see that and come to the same conclusion but maybe its a language thing and you don't know they are the same name?
D'Bridge has a Cowbell feature, in fact a few hooks to allow playing o audio files on personal mail. So naturally I *expect* you to "one up" every time I publish an update... lol.
I just renamed mystic.exe to cowbell.exe! Your move, sir! :)
I just renamed mystic.exe to cowbell.exe! Your move, sir! :)
If you can actually convince everyone in the Mystic echo to do this
and/or the Mystic installer will do this... that could be a
"checkmate".
I am working on setting up my Telegard system as a point off my
Renegade setup. Is there anything special I have to do in the D'Bridge
host to set it up as a point? I was going through the docs and didn't
see much.
I got this message twice ...
PATH: 387/28 396/45 280/464 292/854
PATH: 387/28 396/45 261/38 640/1321 1384 633/280 229/426 292/854
Crappy version of Renegade?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 371 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 173:49:38 |
Calls: | 7,915 |
Files: | 12,983 |
Messages: | 5,797,634 |