Researchers find cervical cancer screening is overused - and underused
as well

Date:
October 12, 2021
Source:
University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
Summary:
New research finds many women are screened too often for cervical
cancer, leading to unnecessary procedures that may carry their
own harms, while some women are not getting tested often enough,
putting them at higher risk for poor outcomes.



FULL STORY ========================================================================== Cervical cancer screening saves lives -- no one disputes that.


==========================================================================
But University of New Mexico researchers have found that many women are screened too often, leading to unnecessary procedures that may carry
their own harms, while some women are not getting tested often enough,
putting them at higher risk for poor outcomes.

The team led by Cosette Wheeler, PhD, Regent's Professor in the UNM
Department of Pathology and director of the Center for HPV Protection at
the UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, looked at compliance with updated
national guidelines for cervical cancer screening issued in 2012.

The new recommendations for women aged 30-64 at average risk for
cervical cancer called for co-testing for human papillomavirus (HPV)
and liquid-based cytology -- an updated version of the traditional Pap
smear -- every five years, or every three years for cytology alone.

The researchers studied statewide data collected by the New Mexico HPV
Pap Registry, established in 2006 to evaluate cervical-cancer screening delivery, and report in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute
that 65 percent of New Mexico women screened in 2019 with a normal prior co-test had undergone re- screening within the previous three years --
far more often than recommended.

At the same time, 6.5% of women screened with a prior negative co-test
and 14.9% of women with a prior negative cytology alone were not re-tested
for more than five and up to seven years. These findings were concerning,
given that negative cytology alone does not provide the same assurance
that a negative co- test does for having a low risk of cervical cancer.



==========================================================================
"We not only show the overuse of cervical cancer screening, but we also
show that more and more women are not coming back for more than five
years," Wheeler says.

"Alarmingly, as recommendations for intervals between cervical screening
have become longer and therefore less frequent, more women are falling
out of screening within reasonable and recommended intervals. They are not coming back until five or more years, which is too long to have protection
from prior screening." Over-testing is problematic not only because HPV
tests are expensive, but because a positive result does not necessarily indicate a problem. An estimated 40 percent of women aged 18-59 years
are infected with one or more genital HPV types, but most infections
will go away on their own and do not pose a cancer risk, Wheeler says.

"What you're trying to do is only detect those HPV infections that will
cause or reflect existing disease," she says, but follow-up biopsies
to resolve that question add expenses, and if additional tissue removal
is required, it may increase the risk for reproductive harms, including pre-term delivery.

Under-screening poses is the worst-case scenario, because a woman may
have started to develop undetected cancer if she has gone too many
years without appropriate screening, Wheeler says, and inequities in
screening, including race, ethnicity and being economically and socially disadvantaged, can contribute to increased cancer risk and reduced access
to health care.



==========================================================================
Part of the problem lies with long-standing recommendations that women
receive a Pap screen every year. From a scientific standpoint, "women of average risk, regardless of age, should not get a cervical screen more
than once every three years," Wheeler says. But the routine screening
was at least easier to keep track of when done annually.

She suggests that performing screening more often than recommended with
co- testing every one, two or three years has financial benefits for both clinicians and laboratories, which is another dimension of the problem.

Now, doctors -- and their patients -- may not do a good job of keeping
track of when the last screening was performed, and women often change
where they receive health care. Meanwhile, centralized tracking systems
to help providers and patients keep track of when women should schedule
a five-year co-test or three-year cytology are mostly lacking in the U.S.

The New Mexico HPV Pap Registry, with its statewide reach, is an
exception, Wheeler says. "Systems like this could be used to help
providers deliver cost- effective screening and timely follow-up of abnormalities," she says.

"Estimates for cervical cancer prevention in the U.S. were in
the ballpark of $8 billion a year prior to the implementation
of HPV vaccines, which represent significant additional costs,"
Wheeler adds. "There is little ability to assess whether clinical
guidelines are being followed or if there are positive or negative
impacts of guideline practices in real-world settings. That's
the way the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry is contributing." ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by University_of_New_Mexico_Health_Sciences_Center. Note: Content may be
edited for style and length.


========================================================================== Journal Reference:
1. Philip E Castle, Walter K Kinney, Lu Chen, Jane J Kim, Steven
Jenison,
Giovanna Rossi, Huining Kang, Jack Cuzick, Cosette M Wheeler,
Nancy E Walter Joste, Cosette M Kinney, Charles L Wheeler, Michael
Wiggins, Ruth M Robertson, Alan McDonald, Steven Waxman, Jean
Jenison, Debbie Howe, Jane J Saslow, Mark H Kim, Jack Stoler, Philip
E Cuzick, Rebecca B Castle, Janice L Perkins, Salina Gonzales,
Giovanna Torres, Kevin Rossi, English. Adherence to National
Guidelines on Cervical Screening: A Population-Based Evaluation
From a Statewide Registry. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer
Institute, 2021; DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab173 ==========================================================================

Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/10/211012095040.htm

--- up 5 weeks, 5 days, 8 hours, 25 minutes
* Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)