• Dog feces and urine could be harming nat

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Mon Feb 7 21:30:42 2022
    Dog feces and urine could be harming nature reserves, according to new
    study

    Date:
    February 7, 2022
    Source:
    British Ecological Society
    Summary:
    New research finds that dogs being walked in nature reserves
    contribute a significant amount of nutrients to the environment
    through their feces and urine, which researchers warn could
    negatively impact local biodiversity.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    New research finds that dogs being walked in nature reserves contribute
    a significant amount of nutrients to the environment through their
    faeces and urine, which researchers warn could negatively impact local biodiversity. The research is published in the British Ecological Society journal, Ecological Solutions and Evidence.


    ========================================================================== Significant levels of fertilisation Researchers at Ghent University
    have estimated that each year dog faeces and urine add an average of
    11kg of nitrogen and 5kg of phosphorus per hectare to nature reserves
    near the Belgian city of Ghent. The researchers say that the nutrients
    added through this neglected form of fertilisation are substantial and
    could be detrimental to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.

    The estimates for the amount of nitrogen being added by this previously unrecorded source are particularly significant when compared to the
    total levels of nitrogen being added across most of Europe through fossil
    fuel emissions and agriculture, which range from 5 to 25kg of nitrogen
    per hectare.

    Professor Pieter De Frenne of Ghent University and lead author of the
    research said: "We were surprised by how high nutrient inputs from dogs
    could be.

    Atmospheric nitrogen inputs from agriculture, industry and traffic
    rightfully receive a lot of policy attention, but dogs are entirely
    neglected in this respect." The researchers call for land managers,
    especially in low nutrient ecosystems, to emphasise the negative
    fertilisation effects of dogs to visitors, encouraging them to remove
    their dogs' faeces. They also call for leash use to be enforced more stringently and the establishment of more off-leash dog parks to reduce
    the pressure on nature reserves.



    ==========================================================================
    Dogs on leashes and owners removing faeces have big impacts In the
    experiment, which calculated the amount of nutrients dogs were adding to
    the environment by recording the number of dogs present in four nature reserves, the researchers modelled different scenarios including if the
    dogs were on or off leashes and if owners picked up dog faeces.

    When the researchers modelled a scenario where all dogs were kept on
    leashes (legally required in all these reserves) they found that this
    reduced the fertilisation rates in the largest part of the reserves
    but strongly increased fertilisation rates in the small areas around
    paths. Over a year this input was as high as 175 kg of nitrogen and 73
    kg of phosphorus per hectare.

    Professor De Frenne said: "In our scenario where all dogs were kept
    on leashes, we found that in these concentrated areas around paths,
    nutrient inputs of both nitrogen and phosphorus exceeded legal limits
    for fertilization of agricultural land. Which is quite staggering as
    our study concerned nature reserves!" In a scenario where dogs were on leashes, but all owners picked up their dogs' faeces, the researchers
    found that this reduced fertilisation levels by 56% for nitrogen and
    97% for phosphorus. This is due to dog faeces accounting for nearly all phosphorus being deposited whereas nitrogen is deposited equally by both
    faeces and urine.



    ========================================================================== Increased nutrients a problem for nature reserves The addition of
    nutrients to nature reserves might sound beneficial as these lead
    to increased plant growth, however, this mostly occurs in a limited
    number of nutrient demanding species that outcompete rarer specialists, reducing biodiversity.

    "In many nature reserves, the management is specifically directed
    towards lowering soil nutrient levels to enhance plant and animal
    biodiversity. This can be done through methods like mowing and hay
    removal." Explains Professor De Frenne. "Our findings suggest that
    the currently neglected inputs of dogs in nature reserves could delay restoration goals." Calculating nutrient levels To estimate the amount
    of nutrients dogs were adding to the environment, the researchers first calculated dog abundance per hectare, per year, by counting dogs in
    four nature reserves close to the city of Ghent, Belgium. These counts
    were performed on 487 occasions over 18 months. They then performed a literature search of nutrient concentrations in dog urine and faeces to
    model different scenarios.

    While this method meant that researchers could accurately calculate the abundance of dogs in the nature reserves, estimations had to be made
    based on the average dog and average volumes of urine and mass of faeces,
    as well as estimates of nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations.

    The researchers say that their data could be improved by recording breeds
    of dogs, as well as their size, weight and the number of urine and faecal deposits, for instance, by asking owners. The researchers also suggest
    that georeferencing dog faeces and urine locations could further help
    to detect fertilisation 'hot spots'.

    special promotion Get a free digital "Metabolism Myths"
    issue of New Scientist and discover the 7 things we
    always get wrong about diet and exercise. Claim_yours_now_>>> ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by British_Ecological_Society. Note:
    Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Pieter De Frenne, Mathias Cougnon, Geert P. J. Janssens, Pieter
    Vangansbeke. Nutrient fertilization by dogs in peri‐urban
    ecosystems. Ecological Solutions and Evidence, 2022; 3 (1) DOI:
    10.1002/ 2688-8319.12128 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/02/220207083438.htm

    --- up 9 weeks, 2 days, 7 hours, 13 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)