• Common solar tech can power smart device

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Thu Aug 19 21:30:40 2021
    Common solar tech can power smart devices indoors

    Date:
    August 19, 2021
    Source:
    National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
    Summary:
    Any time you turn on a light at home or in the office, you are
    expending electrical energy. But what if flipping the light switch
    meant providing other useful energy too? We usually think of solar,
    or photovoltaic (PV), cells fixed to roofs, converting sunlight
    into electricity, but bringing that technology indoors could
    further boost the energy efficiency of buildings and energize
    swaths of wireless smart technologies such as smoke alarms,
    cameras and temperature sensors, also called Internet of Things
    (IoT) devices. Now, a new study suggests that a straightforward
    approach for capturing light indoors may be within reach.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    Any time you turn on a light at home or in the office, you are expending energy. But what if flipping the light switch meant producing energy too?

    ==========================================================================
    We usually think of solar, or photovoltaic (PV), cells fixed to roofs, converting sunlight into electricity, but bringing that technology indoors could further boost the energy efficiency of buildings and energize
    swaths of wireless smart technologies such as smoke alarms, cameras and temperature sensors, also called Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Now,
    a study from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
    suggests that a straightforward approach for capturing light indoors may
    be within reach. NIST researchers tested the indoor charging ability of
    small modular PV devices made of different materials and then hooked up
    the lowest efficiency module - - composed of silicon -- to a wireless temperature sensor.

    The team's results, published in the journal Energy Science & Engineering, demonstrate that the silicon module, absorbing only light from an LED,
    supplied more power than the sensor consumed in operation. This outcome suggests that the device could run continuously while lights remain on,
    which would do away with the need for someone to manually exchange or
    recharge the battery.

    "People in the field have assumed it's possible to power IoT devices
    with PV modules in the long term, but we haven't really seen the data
    to support that before now, so this is kind of a first step to say that
    we can pull it off," said Andrew Shore, a NIST mechanical engineer and
    lead author of the study.

    Most buildings are lit by a mix of both the sun and artificial light
    sources during the day. At dusk, the latter could continue to supply
    energy to devices.

    However, light from common indoor sources, such as LEDs, spans a narrower spectrum of light than the wider bands emitted by the sun, and some solar
    cell materials are better at capturing these wavelengths than others.

    To find out exactly how a few different materials would stack up, Shore
    and his colleagues tested PV mini modules made of gallium indium phosphide (GaInP), gallium arsenide (GaAs) -- two materials geared toward white
    LED light -- and silicon, a less efficient but more affordable and
    commonplace material.



    ==========================================================================
    The researchers placed the centimeters-wide modules underneath a white
    LED, housed inside an opaque black box to block out external light
    sources. The LED produced light at a fixed intensity of 1000 lux,
    comparable to light levels in a well-lit room, for the duration of the experiments. For the silicon and GaAs PV modules, soaking in indoor light proved less efficient than sunshine, but the GaInP module performed far
    better under the LED than sunlight. Both the GaInP and GaAs modules significantly outpaced silicon indoors, converting 23.1% and 14.1%
    of the LED light into electrical power, respectively, compared with
    silicon's 9.3% power conversion efficiency.

    Coming as no surprise to the researchers, the rankings were the same
    for a charging test in which they timed how long it took the modules to
    fill a half- charged 4.18-volt battery, with silicon coming in last by
    a margin of more than a day and a half.

    The team was interested in learning if the silicon module, despite its
    poor performance relative to its top-shelf competitors, could generate
    enough power to run a low-demand IoT device, Shore said.

    Their IoT device of choice for the next experiment was a temperature
    sensor that they hooked up to the silicon PV module, placed once more
    under an LED.

    Upon turning the sensor on, the researchers found that it was able to
    feed temperature readings wirelessly to a computer nearby, powered by
    the silicon module alone. After two hours, they switched off the light
    in the black box and the sensor continued to run, its battery depleting
    at half the rate it took to charge.

    "Even with a less efficient mini module, we found that we could still
    supply more power than the wireless sensor consumed," Shore said.

    The researchers' findings suggest that an already ubiquitous material
    in outdoor PV modules could be repurposed for indoor devices with
    low-capacity batteries. The results are particularly applicable to
    commercial buildings where lights are on around the clock. But how well
    would PV-powered devices run in spaces that are only lit intermittently throughout the day or shut off at night? And how much of a factor would
    ambient light pouring in from outside be? Homes and office spaces aren't
    black boxes after all.

    The team plans to tackle both questions, first by setting up
    light-measuring devices in NIST's Net-Zero Energy Residential Test
    Facility to gain an understanding of what light is available throughout
    the day in an average residence, Shore said. Then they'll replicate the lighting conditions of the net-zero house in the lab to find out how
    PV-powered IoT devices perform in a residential scenario.

    Feeding their data into computer models will also be important for
    predicting how much power PV modules would produce indoors given a certain level of light, a key capability for cost-effective implementation of
    the technology.

    "We're turning on our lights all the time and as we move more toward computerized commercial buildings and homes, PV could be a way to harvest
    some of the wasted light energy and improve our energy efficiency,"
    Shore said.

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by National_Institute_of_Standards_and_Technology_(NIST).

    Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Andrew Shore, John Roller, Jennifer Bergeson, Behrang
    H. Hamadani. Indoor
    light energy harvesting for battery‐powered sensors using
    small photovoltaic modules. Energy Science & Engineering, 2021;
    DOI: 10.1002/ ese3.964 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/08/210819102700.htm

    --- up 14 weeks, 6 days, 22 hours, 45 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)