• Extinction and origination patterns chan

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Wed Oct 6 21:30:42 2021
    Extinction and origination patterns change after mass extinctions

    Date:
    October 6, 2021
    Source:
    Stanford University
    Summary:
    A sweeping analysis of marine fossils from most of the past
    half-billion years shows the usual rules of body size evolution
    change during mass extinctions and their recoveries. The discovery
    is an early step toward predicting how evolution will play out on
    the other side of the current extinction crisis.



    FULL STORY ========================================================================== Scientists at Stanford University have discovered a surprising pattern
    in how life reemerges from cataclysm. Research published Oct. 6 in
    Proceedings of the Royal Society B shows the usual rules of body size
    evolution change not only during mass extinction, but also during
    subsequent recovery.


    ========================================================================== Since the 1980s, evolutionary biologists have debated whether mass
    extinctions and the recoveries that follow them intensify the selection criteria of normal times -- or fundamentally shift the set of traits that
    mark groups of species for destruction. The new study finds evidence
    for the latter in a sweeping analysis of marine fossils from most of
    the past half-billion years.

    Whether and how evolutionary dynamics shift in the wake of global
    annihilation has "profound implications not only for understanding the
    origins of the modern biosphere but also for predicting the consequences
    of the current biodiversity crisis," the authors write.

    "Ultimately, we want to be able to look at the fossil record and use it
    to predict what will go extinct, and more importantly, what comes back,"
    said lead author Pedro Monarrez, a postdoctoral scholar in Stanford's
    School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences (Stanford Earth). "When
    we look closely at 485 million years of extinctions and recoveries in the world's oceans, there does appear to be a pattern in what comes back based
    on body size in some groups." Build back smaller? The study builds on
    recent Stanford research that looked at body size and extinction risk
    among marine animals in groupings known as genera, one taxonomic level
    above species. That study found smaller-bodied genera on average are
    equally or more likely to than their larger relatives to go extinct.



    ==========================================================================
    The new study found this pattern holds true across 10 classes of marine
    animals for the long stretches of time between mass extinctions. But mass extinctions shake up the rules in unpredictable ways, with extinction
    risks becoming even greater for smaller genera in some classes, and
    larger genera losing out in others.

    The results show smaller genera in a class known as crinoids -- sometimes called sea lilies or fairy money -- were substantially more likely to be
    wiped out during mass extinction events. In contrast, no detectable size differences between victims and survivors turned up during "background" intervals. Among trilobites, a diverse group distantly related to modern horseshoe crabs, the chances of extinction decreased very slightly with
    body size during background intervals -- but increased about eightfold
    with each doubling of body length during mass extinction.

    When they looked beyond the marine genera that died out to consider
    those that were the first of their kind, the authors found an even more dramatic shift in body size patterns before and after extinctions. During background times, newly evolved genera tend to be slightly larger than
    those that came before. During recovery from mass extinction, the pattern flips, and it becomes more common for originators in most classes to be
    tiny compared to holdover species who survived the cataclysm.

    Gastropod genera including sea snails are among a few exceptions
    to the build- back-smaller pattern. Gastropod genera that originated
    during recovery intervals tended to be larger than the survivors of the preceding catastrophe.

    Nearly across the board, the authors write, "selectivity on body size is
    more pronounced, regardless of direction, during mass extinction events
    and their recovery intervals than during background times." Think of
    this as the biosphere's version of choosing starters and benchwarmers
    based on height and weight more than skill after losing a big match. There
    may well be a logic to this game plan in the arc of evolution. "Our next challenge is to identify the reasons why so many originators after mass extinction are small," said senior author Jonathan Payne, the Dorrell
    William Kirby Professor at Stanford Earth.



    ========================================================================== Scientists don't yet know whether those reasons might relate to
    global environmental conditions, such as low oxygen levels or
    rising temperatures, or to factors related to interactions between
    organisms and their local surroundings, like food scarcity or a dearth
    of predators. According to Payne, "Identifying the causes of these
    patterns may help us not only to understand how our current world came
    to be but also to project the long-term evolutionary response to the
    current extinction crisis." Fossil data This is the latest in a series
    of papers from Payne's research group that harness statistical analyses
    and computer simulations to uncover evolutionary dynamics in body size
    data from marine fossil records. In 2015, the team recruited high school interns and undergraduates to help calculate the body size and volume
    of thousands of marine genera from photographs and illustrations. The
    resulting dataset included most fossil invertebrate animal genera known
    to science and was at least 10 times larger than any previous compilation
    of fossil animal body sizes.

    The group has since expanded the dataset and plumbed it for
    patterns. Among other results, they've found that larger body size has
    become one of the biggest determinants of extinction risk for ocean
    animals for the first time in the history of life on Earth.

    For the new study, Monarrez, Payne and co-author Noel Heim of Tufts
    University used body size data from marine fossil records to estimate
    the probability of extinction and origination as a function of body
    size across most of the past 485 million years. By pairing their body
    size data with occurrence records from the public Paleobiology Database,
    they were able to analyze 284,308 fossil occurrences for ocean animals belonging to 10,203 genera. "This dataset allowed us to document, in
    different groups of animals, how evolutionary patterns change when a
    mass extinction comes along," said Payne.

    Future recovery Other paleontologists have observed that smaller-bodied
    animals become more common in the fossil record following mass extinctions
    -- often calling it the "Lilliput Effect," after the kingdom of tiny
    people in Jonathan Swift's 18th- century novel Gulliver's Travels.

    Findings in the new study suggest animal physiology offers a plausible explanation for this pattern. The authors found the classic shrinking
    pattern in most classes of marine animals with low activity levels and
    slower metabolism. Species in these groups that first evolved right
    after a mass extinction tended to have smaller bodies than those that originated during background intervals. In contrast, when new species
    evolved in groups of more active marine animals with faster metabolism,
    they tended to have larger bodies in the wake of extinction and smaller
    bodies during normal times.

    The results highlight mass extinction as a drama in two acts. "The
    extinction part changes the world by removing not just a lot of
    organisms or a lot of species, but by removing them in various selective patterns. Then, recovery isn't just equal for everyone who survives. A
    new set of biases go into the recovery pattern," Payne said. "It's only
    by combining those two that you can really understand the world that we
    get five or 10 million years after an extinction event." Payne is also
    a professor of geological sciences and, by courtesy, of biology.

    Support for this research was provided by the U.S. National Science
    Foundation and Stanford's School of Earth, Energy & Environmental
    Sciences.

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Stanford_University. Original written
    by Josie Garthwaite. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Pedro M. Monarrez, Noel A. Heim, Jonathan L. Payne. Mass extinctions
    alter extinction and origination dynamics with respect to body size.

    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2021;
    288 (1960) DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1681 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/10/211006143434.htm

    --- up 4 weeks, 6 days, 8 hours, 25 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)