After a long time, I did the count again of unique sysop-names in the nodelist ...
Z1 311
Z2 583
Z3 23
Z4 19
947
After a long time, I did the count again of unique sysop-names in
the nodelist ...
Z1 311
Z2 583
Z3 23
Z4 19
947
Interesting would be, what the changes are compared to the previous count...
I did a count again of individual unique sysop-names ...
Zone1 309
Zone2 575
Zone3 21
Zone4 19
924
===
After a long time, I did the count again of unique sysop-names in
the nodelist ...
Z1 311
Z2 583
Z3 23
Z4 19
947
Interesting would be, what the changes are compared to the previous
count...
Ward wrote (2020-02-07):
I did a count again of individual unique sysop-names ...
Zone1 309
Zone2 575
Zone3 21
Zone4 19
924
===
I did a count again of individual unique sysop-names ...
Zone1 309
Zone2 575
Zone3 21
Zone4 19
924
===
If Ward wrote it, why are my initials in front of it? ;)
Ward Dossche wrote to All <=-
After a long time, I did the count again of unique sysop-names in
the nodelist ...
Z1 311
Z2 583
Z3 23
Z4 19
947
Z1 311
Z2 583
Z3 23
Z4 19
Zone1 309
Zone2 575
Zone3 21
Zone4 19
Z1 311
Z2 583
Z3 23
Z4 19
Zone1 309
Zone2 575
Zone3 21
Zone4 19
You could say that Fidonet managed to flatten the curve ...
You could say that Fidonet managed to flatten the curve ...
I believe that when all nodes are checked for being connectable, and the dead wood is removed, and we still have the same numbers... Well one can dream. ;)
realYou could say that Fidonet managed to flatten the curve ...
I believe that when all nodes are checked for being connectable, and
the dead wood is removed, and we still have the same numbers... Well
one can dream. ;)
The count is about individual sysop-names, not the number of nodes ...
or ficticious.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 447 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 41:07:10 |
Calls: | 9,241 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,496 |
Messages: | 6,065,299 |