@MSGID: 1:153/135 0016d24b
@PID: PCBWave v1.10+
Hi All,
Just a test upload with SemPoint + BW -> dangerbay bbs (pcboard) and bluewave door.
Upon download of the first packet, I noticed that the "time" field was "00:00" for all the messages. Probably not a good sign. :(
Also, there were no kludges in the header. :(
Starting to look like BW is not well supported anymore. But here's
hoping that the CRs will work on this "official" bluewave system.
../|ug
* SeM. 2.26 * Behaviorism is the art of pulling habits out
--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/100
* Origin: Danger Bay BBS * Vancouver, Canada (1:153/135)
SEEN-BY: 153/105 135 250 757 6809 7715 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360
240/1120
SEEN-BY: 267/67 280/464 5003 5555 290/10 320/119 219 640/1321 1384
712/848
SEEN-BY: 3634/12
@PATH: 153/135 757 221/6 1 640/1384
@MSGID: 1:153/135 0016d24b
@PID: PCBWave v1.10+
Hi All,
Just a test upload with SemPoint + BW -> dangerbay bbs (pcboard) and bluewave door.
Upon download of the first packet, I noticed that the "time" field was "00:00" for all the messages. Probably not a good sign. :(
Also, there were no kludges in the header. :(
Starting to look like BW is not well supported anymore. But here's
hoping that the CRs will work on this "official" bluewave system.
../|ug
* SeM. 2.26 * Behaviorism is the art of pulling habits out
--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/100
* Origin: Danger Bay BBS * Vancouver, Canada (1:153/135)
SEEN-BY: 103/705 153/105 135 250 757 6809 7715 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 SEEN-BY: 221/360 229/426 240/1120 5832 267/67 280/464 5003 5555 290/10 SEEN-BY: 310/31 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250
@PATH: 153/135 757 221/6 1 280/464
Hi All,bluewave
Just a test upload with SemPoint + BW -> dangerbay bbs (pcboard) and
door.
Upon download of the first packet, I noticed that the "time" field was "00:00"
for all the messages. Probably not a good sign. :(
Starting to look like BW is not well supported anymore. But here's hoping tha
the CRs will work on this "official" bluewave system.
@MSGID: 1:153/135 0016d24b
@PID: PCBWave v1.10+
Just a test upload with SemPoint + BW -> dangerbay bbs
(pcboard) and bluewave door.
At least the MSGID kludge is in your message on arrival here...
andJust a test upload with SemPoint + BW -> dangerbay bbs
(pcboard) and bluewave door.
At least the MSGID kludge is in your message on arrival here...
The MSGID originating from SemPoint is being replaced with a new one
by the PCBWave door.
Infact, it looks like every host system is replacing the original MSGID
PID that SemPoint puts in. I thought that if those were present upon upload, they would remain untouched.
Not a major issue. But the lack of ANY kludges in the downloaded
packets from DangerBay's PCBWave door, is a bit disconcerting.
Not a major issue. But the lack of ANY kludges in the downloaded
packets from DangerBay's PCBWave door, is a bit disconcerting.
I don't see a reason why they should be removed unless the bluewave standard requires so?
Not a major issue. But the lack of ANY kludges in the downloaded
packets from DangerBay's PCBWave door, is a bit disconcerting.
I don't see a reason why they should be removed unless the bluewave
standard requires so?
I haven't used offline mail much in recent years but before I had my own
node early in the 90's I used offline mail. The kludges were never
included in mail packets I downloaded. It's just as well, the average
offline user doesn't know or care what all that is about.
BBBS has an option to turn them on for those that want them but more
often than not offline mail packets don't include the kludges.
Wilfred van Velzen wrote to August Abolins <=-
TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221
REPLY: 2:221/360 EF6B28DC
MSGID: 2:280/464 779086FC
Hi August,
On 2019-05-09 23:57:00, you wrote to me:
Just a test upload with SemPoint + BW -> dangerbay bbs
(pcboard) and bluewave door.
At least the MSGID kludge is in your message on arrival here...
The MSGID originating from SemPoint is being replaced with a new one
by the PCBWave door.
Infact, it looks like every host system is replacing the original MSGID
and
PID that SemPoint puts in. I thought that if those were present upon upload, they would remain untouched.
If it's from a bluewave package I can see the logic in that. Because bluewave packages basically are equal in status to messages written online by a bbs user. And those messages get the MSGID from the bbs.
Not a major issue. But the lack of ANY kludges in the downloaded
packets from DangerBay's PCBWave door, is a bit disconcerting.
I don't see a reason why they should be removed unless the bluewave standard requires so?
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
* Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
Wilfred van Velzen wrote to August Abolins <=-
TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221
REPLY: 2:221/360 EF6B28DC
MSGID: 2:280/464 779086FC
Hi August,
Just a test reply by Multimail/BW/Concord.
This combination seems to be able to show the kludges...
The MSGID and REPLY kludges are what make the thread systems in the
readers work (and thereby make it easy to follow a conversation properly. Those ought to be the minimum to have. Very useful! :)
TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221
REPLY: 2:221/360 EF6B28DC
MSGID: 2:280/464 779086FC
If it's from a bluewave package I can see the logic in that. Because
bluewave packages basically are equal in status to messages written
online by a bbs user. And those messages get the MSGID from the bbs.
Not a major issue. But the lack of ANY kludges in the downloaded
packets from DangerBay's PCBWave door, is a bit disconcerting.
I don't see a reason why they should be removed unless the bluewave
standard requires so?
Just a test reply by Multimail/BW/Concord.
This combination seems to be able to show the kludges...
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 368 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 87:44:33 |
Calls: | 7,895 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,968 |
Messages: | 5,792,266 |