YES, This IS really a test
YES, This IS really a test
@TZUTC: -0500
@MSGID: 2.fidonet_fidotest@1:229/307 27fcec54
@PID: Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@BBSID: BADPOET
@CHRS: ASCII 1
@NOTE: SlyEdit 1.75 (2021-12-11) (DCT style)
YES, This IS really a test
Mick
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Win32
* Origin: Bad Poetry Blues - badpoet.synchro.net:2300 (1:229/307)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 19/36 30/0 80/1 90/1 92/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 114/705
SEEN-BY: 120/340 123/120 131 124/5016 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 840 SEEN-BY: 220/70 221/0 1 6 226/17 30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 114 200 206 SEEN-BY: 229/275 307 317 400 424 426 428 452 470 550 664 700 240/1120 5832 SEEN-BY: 250/5 8 266/512 267/800 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 292/854 8125 SEEN-BY: 298/25 301/1 113 123 812 305/3 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/66 SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 100 330
SEEN-BY: 770/340 772/210 220 230 5020/1042 153/757 90/1 920/69 92/1 920/1 92/0
SEEN-BY: 920/0 3/1 1/21
@PATH: 229/307 426 317/3 770/1 280/464 301/1 920/1
@TZUTC: -0500
@MSGID: 2.fidonet_fidotest@1:229/307 27fcec54
@PID: Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@BBSID: BADPOET
@CHRS: ASCII1
@NOTE: SlyEdit 1.75 (2021-12-11) (DCT style)
@PATH 229/307 426 664
YES, This IS really a test
Mick
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Win32
* Origin: Bad Poetry Blues - badpoet.synchro.net:2300 (1:229/307)
*** Quoting Mickey from a message to All ***
* Origin: Bad Poetry Blues - badpoet.synchro.net:2300 (1:229/307)
Got you here.
YES, This IS really a test
YES, This IS really a test
I think this test has the blues. ;)
-Jon
YES, This IS really a test
I think this test has the blues. ;)
You're damn right it has the blues. :-)
@MSGID: 2.fidonet_fidotest@1:229/307 27fcec54
@PID: Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@TZUTC: -0500
@TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@BBSID: BADPOET
@CHRS: ASCII 1
@NOTE: SlyEdit 1.75 (2021-12-11) (DCT style)
YES, This IS really a test
Mick
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Win32
* Origin: Bad Poetry Blues - badpoet.synchro.net:2300 (1:229/307) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 19/36 80/1 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 114/705 120/340 SEEN-BY: 123/120 131 124/5016 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 840 SEEN-BY: 220/70 221/0 226/17 30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 114 200 SEEN-BY: 229/206 275 307 317 400 424 426 428 452 470 550 664 700 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 250/5 8 266/512 267/800 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 298/25 301/1 305/3 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 SEEN-BY: 770/100 330 340 772/210 220 230
@PATH: 229/307 426 317/3 770/1 280/464
Your real-name and nodelist entry are broken:
,307,Bad_Poetry_Blues,Trent_Hills_ON,Mick_Manning,-Unpublished-,300,CM ,centralontarioremote.com,IBN
Your real-name and nodelist entry are broken:
,307,Bad_Poetry_Blues,Trent_Hills_ON,Mick_Manning,-Unpublished-,300,C M,centralontarioremote.com,IBN
,307,Bad_Poetry_Blues,Trent_Hills_ON,Mick_Manning,-Unpublished-,300,CM
,centralontarioremote.com,IBN
Works from here:
$ nslookup badpoet.synchro.net
It works from here too but the nodelist entry is broken. The centralontarioremote.com or badpoet.synchro.net needs an INA: in
front of it.
,307,Bad_Poetry_Blues,Trent_Hills_ON,Mick_Manning,-Unpublished-,300,CM,cen tralo ntarioremote.com,IBN
Your real-name and nodelist entry are broken:
,307,Bad_Poetry_Blues,Trent_Hills_ON,Mick_Manning,-Unpublished-,300,
CM,centralontarioremote.com,IBN
Works from here:
$ nslookup centralontarioremote.com
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: centralontarioremote.com
Address: 148.170.167.4
,307,Bad_Poetry_Blues,Trent_Hills_ON,Mick_Manning,-Unpublished-,300,C
M,cen tralo ntarioremote.com,IBN
Oh thats just a Christmas season rush job. It'll get fixed. I have space between my ears larger than that.
YES, This IS really a test
Mick
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Win32
* Origin: Bad Poetry Blues - badpoet.synchro.net:2300 (1:229/307)
It works from here too but the nodelist entry is broken. The
centralontarioremote.com or badpoet.synchro.net needs an INA: in
front of it.
Thanks, missed that.
Hi Jay,
On 2022-12-13 07:49:10, you wrote to Alan Ianson:
It works from here too but the nodelist entry is broken. The
centralontarioremote.com or badpoet.synchro.net needs an INA: in
front of it.
Thanks, missed that.
You know there is a utility that can find lots of nodelist errors for
you (including this one).
In Z2 it is used to filter the segments before production. But you
don't have to use it as a filter, you can just use the report it
produces, to find possible errors.
The python version is here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/errflags
Or if you like to use the (compiled) pascal version you can look here:
https://github.com/njonchee/errflags
You know there is a utility that can find lots of nodelist errors for
you (including this one).
In Z2 it is used to filter the segments before production. But you
don't have to use it as a filter, you can just use the report it
produces, to find possible errors.
The python version is here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/errflags
Or if you like to use the (compiled) pascal version you can look here:
https://github.com/njonchee/errflags
This one is a lot more up to date as the python code base Pascal version goes back to v2.17 as against 2.22.
Python code looks up to date (without a very close look).
Hi Vincent,
On 2022-12-14 17:10:09, you wrote to me:
You know there is a utility that can find lots of nodelist errors
for you (including this one).
In Z2 it is used to filter the segments before production. But you
don't have to use it as a filter, you can just use the report it
produces, to find possible errors.
The python version is here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/errflags
Or if you like to use the (compiled) pascal version you can look
here:
https://github.com/njonchee/errflags
This one is a lot more up to date as the python code base Pascal
version goes back to v2.17 as against 2.22.
The python version is based on the latest v2.22 pascal version. I even
sent in a few bug fixes for the v2.22 pascal version to the current maitainer.
The v2.15 on the sourceforge website, was a bit of a special version,
maybe I should remove that one to avoid confusion...
Python code looks up to date (without a very close look).
It is! ;-)
Found a wee bug in the .pas code -
IF the following is not set or used (no parameters used)
EXECUTE then errflags returns after displaying the report with :
An unhandled exception occurred at $000000000042DAB9:
EProcess: Cannot execute empty command-line
$000000000042DAB9
$000000000042E283
$0000000000402194
$00000000004022AD
$0000000000408071
I suspect caused by not checking that the var that would hold param from EXECUTE is not blank / null - It should first check it is not '' and only then issue the command.
You know there is a utility that can find lots of nodelist errors for
you (including this one).
The python version is here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/errflags
Prefix errors : 0
Pvt/phone errors : 0
Phonenumber errors : 0
Baudrate errors : 0
Flag errors : 1
User flag errors : 0
Redundant flags : 0
Duplicate flags : 0
Case conversions : 1
Converted flags : 0
Entries with spaces : 0
Entries with tail commas : 0
Deleted entries : 0
Total prefix errors : 0
Total Pvt/phone errors : 0
Total phonenumber errors : 0
Total baudrate errors : 0
Total flag errors : 1
Total user flag errors : 0
Total redundant flags : 0
Total duplicate flags : 0
Total case conversions : 1
Total converted flags : 0
Total entries with spaces : 0
Total entries with tail commas : 0
Total deleted entries : 0
You know there is a utility that can find lots of nodelist errors
for you (including this one).
The python version is here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/errflags
Well thats rather nifty, thanks!
Hi Vincent,
On 2022-12-14 18:28:42, you wrote to me:
Found a wee bug in the .pas code -
Good find! ;)
IF the following is not set or used (no parameters used)
EXECUTE then errflags returns after displaying the report with
:
An unhandled exception occurred at $000000000042DAB9:
EProcess: Cannot execute empty command-line
$000000000042DAB9
$000000000042E283
$0000000000402194
$00000000004022AD
$0000000000408071
I suspect caused by not checking that the var that would hold
param from EXECUTE is not blank / null - It should first check
it is not '' and only then issue the command.
There is a check, only the wrong variable is checked...
It's one of the bug fixes I sent in to the maintainer.
Got another bug :
Using the facility to send a msg for both cases of no errors and errors found, the magic value %file% does not work here as there is just garbage in the string passed to the utility selected - see log o/p :
--
14-Dec-2022 18:52:42 mbmsg[3402072] MBMSG v1.0.8
14-Dec-2022 18:52:42 mbmsg[3402072] Cmd: post "Vincent_Coen" 9 "Node Segment R eport" /home/mbse/etc/makenl/0.000000ile 14-Dec-2022 18:52:42 mbmsg[3402072] Post "/home/mbse/etc/makenl/%file%" area 9 to "Vincent_Coen"
flavor h 14-Dec-2022 18:52:42 mbmsg[3402072] Subject: "Node Segment Report"
14-Dec-2022 18:52:42 mbmsg[3402072] Can't open /home/mbse/etc/makenl/%file%: No such file or directory 14-Dec-2022 18:52:42 mbmsg[3402072] Terminated with error 131 --
A later attempt is :
--
14-Dec-2022 18:57:21 mbmsg[3402325] MBMSG v1.0.8
14-Dec-2022 18:57:21 mbmsg[3402325] Cmd: post "Vincent_Coen" 9 "Node Segment Report" 0.000000ile 14-Dec-2022 18:57:21 mbmsg[3402325] Post "%file%" area 9 to "Vincent_Coen" flavor h 14-Dec-2022 18:57:21 mbmsg[3402325] Subject: "Node Segment Report" 14-Dec-2022 18:57:21 mbmsg[3402325] Can't open %file%: No such file or directory 14-Dec-2022 18:57:21 mbmsg[3402325] Terminated with error 131 --
In this one the full path was not used as I 'assumed' it was the local directory
For a valid one done manually it shows :
--
14-Dec-2022 19:00:12 mbmsg[3402520] MBMSG v1.0.8
14-Dec-2022 19:00:12 mbmsg[3402520] Cmd: post "Vincent_Coen" 9 "Node Segment Report" net_25.rpt h 14-Dec-2022 19:00:12 mbmsg[3402520] Post "net_25.rpt" area 9 to "Vincent_Coen" flavor h 14-Dec-2022 19:00:12 mbmsg[3402520] Subject: "Node Segment Report" 14-Dec-2022 19:00:12 mbmsg[3402520] Posted message 10 14-Dec-2022 19:00:12 mbmsg[3402520] MBMSG finished in 0.00s --
The content of file errflags.ctl (having removed most comments) :
--
ZONE 2
NET 25
INBOUND /home/mbse/etc/makenl/outbound
FILE region25.* 250/1 net_25.rpt
NOTIFY /home/mbse/bin/mbmsg post "Vincent_Coen" 9 "Node Segment Report" %file% h NOERR /home/mbse/bin/mbmsg post "Vincent_Coen" 9 "Node Segment Report" %file% h NOTIFYPATH /home/mbse/etc/makenl ; ; Key word EXECUTE states any program to execute if any files has been ; processed. This makes
it possible for executing MakeNl only when files ; has actually been received. ; ; do not want to so attempt a simple command as blank may be causing the abort ;EXECUTE MAKENL.EXE REGION.CTL /P >> MAKENLOG.LOG EXECUTE
ls --
Hope it helps,
The python code works though :)
@TZUTC: -0500
@MSGID: 2.fidonet_fidotest@1:229/307 27fcec54
@PID: Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@CHRS: ASCII 1
@NOTE: SlyEdit 1.75 (2021-12-11) (DCT style)
YES, This IS really a test
Mick
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Win32
* Origin: Bad Poetry Blues - badpoet.synchro.net:2300 (1:229/307) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 19/36 80/1 90/1 105/81 106/201 114/705 120/340 123/120 131
SEEN-BY: 153/7715 218/700 840 220/70 226/17 30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 114
SEEN-BY: 229/200 206 275 307 317 400 424 426 428 452 470 550 664 700 250/5 8
SEEN-BY: 266/512 267/800 280/464 282/1038 292/854 298/25 305/3 317/3 320/219
SEEN-BY: 322/757 341/66 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 100 330
SEEN-BY: 770/340 772/210 220 230
@PATH: 229/307 426 317/3 770/1
...Got another bug :
Using the facility to send a msg for both cases of no errors and
errors found, the magic value %file% does not work here as there is
just garbage in the string passed to the utility selected - see log
o/p :
Hope it helps,
That's indeed another bug, or maybe you can call it an inconsistancy compared to what is documented. I think you need to specify %FILE% in uppercase in the ctl file to make it work.
In this one the full path was not used as I 'assumed' it was the
local directory
For a valid one done manually it shows :
Hope it helps,
That's indeed another bug, or maybe you can call it an inconsistancy compared to what is documented. I think you need to specify %FILE% in uppercase in the ctl file to make it work.
The python code works though :)
I tried to test all the options for the python version, which seemed
to have resulted in a descent port of the original pascal version...
;-)
That's indeed another bug, or maybe you can call it an inconsistancy
compared to what is documented. I think you need to specify %FILE% in
uppercase in the ctl file to make it work.
That works - I will have to take a look at the Pascal code assuming I can remember the language - it has been a while :)
I have downloaded and run your latest version and it tests fine for
both %file% and %FILE%.
Might be an idea to mention both forms in errflags.txt and that the param EXECUTE can be omitted.
I did see a few omissions in the source (nit picking) and these are
the changes I made to my copy of the code :
Line 75 & 76 added :
(* 20221215 2.23 Bug fix for %file% -treated as uppercase, null value in * EXECUTE command but still tries to run it
*)
in now line 85 changed to 2.23.
Thanks for the update.
@TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A49
@MSGID: 1:229/307 f14612c7
@TZUTC: -0500
@SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 128/260 135/225 153/7715 218/700 @SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 200 206 275 307 308 317 400 @SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 452 470 550 664 700 266/512 282/1038 291/111 @SEEN-BY: 292/854 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 @SEEN-BY: 5075/35
@PATH: 229/307 426
Adding Fido to WWIV (trying anyway)
Any luck?
Mick Manning
https://centralontarioremote.com
telnet centralontarioremote.com:2300
@TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A49
@MSGID: 1:229/307 f14612c7
@TZUTC: -0500
Adding Fido to WWIV (trying anyway)
Any luck?
Mick Manning
https://centralontarioremote.com
telnet centralontarioremote.com:2300
... I have a really good memory, except it's short.
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/32)
* Origin: Central Ontario Remote Systems (1:229/307)
SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 128/260 135/225 153/7715 218/700 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 200 206 275 307 308 317 400 SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 452 470 550 664 700 266/512 282/1038 291/111
SEEN-BY: 292/854 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 SEEN-BY: 5075/35
@PATH: 229/307 426
Adding Fido to WWIV (trying anyway)
Any luck?
Mick Manning
https://centralontarioremote.com
telnet centralontarioremote.com:2300
... I have a really good memory, except it's short.
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/32)
* Origin: Central Ontario Remote Systems (1:229/307)
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 371 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 175:46:36 |
Calls: | 7,915 |
Files: | 12,983 |
Messages: | 5,797,774 |