It's gonna be the same thing with the women who get the free abortion at the DNC.
If they regret the abortion, which I'm sure they will, they're going to
feel disgusted every time she sees a Democrat.
One way or another, or maybe even in two ways or more, people are going to be repulsed by Democrats for this.
It's gonna be the same thing with the women who get the free abortion at DNC.
The DNC does not offer free abortions.
If any woman wants/needs an abortion they should see a doctor since an abortion is health care, not politics.
People are going to be repulsed by people who won't mind their own business and let women take care of their own lives/bodies with care provided by a doctor.
It's gonna be the same thing with the women who get the free abortion at the DNC. If they regret the abortion, which I'm sure they will, they're going to feel disgusted every time she sees a Democrat.
One way or another, or maybe even in two ways or more, people are going to be repulsed by Democrats for this.
It's gonna be the same thing with the women who get the free abortion at the
DNC.
The DNC does not offer free abortions.
One way or another, or maybe even in two ways or more, people are going repulsed by Democrats for this.
I would think that Democrats getting abortions... and vasectomies... at the DNC would come as good news to right-wing Republicans as it is most likely preventing more future Democrats?
Exactly. That's why this "abortion on wheels" is going to be remembered as something that Democrats pushed on people, instead of minding their own business.
The DNC does not offer free abortions.
Planned Parenthood offers free abortions, vasectomies at mobile clinic near DNC to "show what is possible"
Another article about the Planned Parenthood bus regarding "no cost"
abortion and vasectomy service:
There are women who have expressed regret after getting a tattoo, but it's something that they have to live with for the rest of their lives.
Then there are women who have expressed regret after having an abortion, but
that's something they have to live with the rest of their lives too.
Imagine a woman has a friend who does tattoos, and the friend offers to give
the woman a tattoo for free. If the woman regrets getting the tattoo, she's
going to feel disgusted every time she sees that friend.
It's gonna be the same thing with the women who get the free abortion at the
DNC. If they regret the abortion, which I'm sure they will, they're going to feel disgusted every time she sees a Democrat.
One way or another, or maybe even in two ways or more, people are going to be repulsed by Democrats for this.
Lack of access to safe, timely, affordable and respectful abortion care is a
critical public health and human rights issue.
There is no "abortion on wheels".
None the less. The plan Parenthood vehicle was there. Offering 2 services 1 abortions and 2 vasectomies.
The DNC does not offer "free abortions"
The DNC does not offer "free abortions"
I don't think anyone is saying the DNC is offering them. It's Plan Parenthood who is offering them.
Plan Parenthood put their mobile abortion clink outside of the DNC because its the Democrats who fund them.
Alan "FOCUS"
Planned parenthood is a good thing regardless of where they park.
Planned parenthood is a good thing regardless of where they park.
1. Compared to what?
2. At what cost?
3. What hard evidence do you have?
The DNC does not offer free abortions.
Planned Parenthood offers free abortions, vasectomies at mobile clinic near DNC to "show what is possible"
The DNC does not offer "free abortions"
Don't be silly.
Another article about the Planned Parenthood bus regarding "no cost" abortion and vasectomy service:
Is no cost abortions or vasectomies a bad thing?
Good or bad the DNC soes not offer "free abortions".
Exactly. That's why this "abortion on wheels" is going to be remembered as something that Democrats pushed on people, instead of minding their own business.
There is no "abortion on wheels".
None the less. The plan Parenthood vehicle was there. Offering 2 services 1
abortions and 2 vasectomies.
You could park your vehicle there to, if you wanted to do that.
None the less. The DNC does not provide abortions.
None the less. The plan Parenthood vehicle was there. Offering 2 services 1
abortions and 2 vasectomies.
You could park your vehicle there to, if you wanted to do that.
None the less. The DNC does not provide abortions.
The DNC does not offer "free abortions"
I don't think anyone is saying the DNC is offering them. It's Plan Parenthood who is offering them.
This is exactly what Aaron was/is/has been saying.
Planned parenthood is superior to unplanned parenthood. Even a
republican will tell you that.
Aaron NEVER said in this thread that *the DNC* was offering them.
He said they were being offered *AT* the DNC, which *THEY ARE*.
Is no cost abortions or vasectomies a bad thing?
I didn't say if they were. I was pointing out that you were, as usual, mistaken and that they were indeed being offered *AT* the DNC.
Good or bad the DNC soes not offer "free abortions".
Aaron NEVER said in this thread that *the DNC* was offering them. He said they were being offered *AT* the DNC, which *THEY ARE*.
You English comprehension is *HORRIBLE*.
There is no "abortion on wheels".
You didn't read either of the damn links I posted here, did you?
You could park your vehicle there to, if you wanted to do that.
None the less. The DNC does not provide abortions.
No one said they did.
None the less. The DNC does not provide abortions.
No one said they did. You are the only one who made the mistake of
thinking it was said. I wonder why?
This is exactly what Aaron was/is/has been saying.
NO, HE SAID "AT THE DNC," WHICH IS 100% CORRECT.
Stop promoting your racist ideas...
You also need to look up Margaret Sander ... ONE OF the original
founding ideas behind Plan Parenthood was to use abortion to cull the Negro population. She was a racist and wanted to use eugenics to do
this.
Stop promoting your racist ideas...
What I said about Margret is a known fact!!!
He said they were being offered *AT* the DNC, which *THEY ARE*.
That is a lie.
This is what Aaron said in his original "DNC's abortion truck" message.
And I quote..
"It's gonna be the same thing with the women who get the free abortion
at the DNC."
He was just recently telling me that I should be "glad that liberals are aborting their babies."
"It's gonna be the same thing with the women who get the free abortion
at the DNC."
https://ibb.co/Y2b9Jzf
No! Don't guess at it! It was held at The United Center!
He was just recently telling me that I should be "glad that liberals are aborting their babies." I'm not glad about it! They should try listening to an ultrasound first. Nothing sounds more wonderful than a baby's heartbeat.
"It's gonna be the same thing with the women who get the free abortion >> at the DNC."
https://ibb.co/Y2b9Jzf
Oh, you meant out on the street, not "at the DNC".
No! Don't guess at it! It was held at The United Center!
I know where the united center is and free abortions are not, but thank you.
I have regrets... I think about what I may have/should have said... More than likely I would not have drove her... I'm not sure what to say... My opinion does not have to be hers... Her involvement in that doesn't
have to be mine.
Could you imagine if that young girl bumped into Alan, or whomever, who
is pro abortion, who flippantly said... Have an abortion... who cares... don't tell your parents, they'll only be disappointed in you.
Roe, the woman in the case Roe V Wade later became a pro life advocate
and she was completely devastated that her name was attached to that
case. She later said she felt manipulated by the pro choice people.
I know where the united center is and free abortions are not, but thank
you.
Yea, not at the DNC headquarters, but at the DNC convention.
IB Joe wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
What I said about Margret is a known fact!!!
Aaron NEVER said in this thread that *the DNC* was offering them.
Don't be dishonest.
He said they were being offered *AT* the DNC, which *THEY ARE*.
That is a lie.
And I quote..
"It's gonna be the same thing with the women who get the free abortion at the DNC."
There is no mention of "truck".
Is no cost abortions or vasectomies a bad thing?
I didn't say if they were. I was pointing out that you were, as usual, mistaken and that they were indeed being offered *AT* the DNC.
I was not mistaken.
Good or bad the DNC soes not offer "free abortions".
Aaron NEVER said in this thread that *the DNC* was offering them. He said they were being offered *AT* the DNC, which *THEY ARE*.
Aaron said women were getting free abortions at the DNC.
You English comprehension is *HORRIBLE*.
Get a grip on reality MAGA.
There is no "abortion on wheels".
You didn't read either of the damn links I posted here, did you?
The DNC does not offer abortions, free or otherwise.
None the less. The DNC does not provide abortions.
No one said they did. You are the only one who made the mistake of thinking it was said. I wonder why?
Maybe because it has been a MAGA talking point since, well.. MAGA!
Aaron made no mention of any truck or planned parenthood. Just "women who get the free abortion at the DNC.
Of course I told you already. The DNC does not provide abortions!
MAGA! MAGA! MAGA! MAGA!
Planned parenthood is a good thing regardless of where they park.
1. Compared to what?
2. At what cost?
3. What hard evidence do you have?
What I said about Margret is a known fact!!!
"... and what makes them [Lefties] tremendously dangerous is that facts that contradict what they believe are simply ignored or evaded." --
Thomas Sowell
Don't bother. Alan is by far the most dense person I have ever
interacted with in this echo. Well, wait, there used to be a user here named Tim Richardson who might have been slighly worse. Just imagine
"Lee Lofaso" as a "conservative" and you will have the proper mental
image of Tim.
But Alan is the current leader. He is useful, though. Whenever someone claims that only conservatives are misinformed, dumb, uneducated, etc., you can parade a few conversations with Alan out which will quickly prove otherwise.
The DNC does not offer abortions, free or otherwise.
*NO ONE SAID THEY DID*
Of course I told you already. The DNC does not provide abortions!
*No one* said they did. Not one. Only you seem to believe that.
So you are MAGA now?
Whenever someone claims that only conservatives are misinformed, dumb, uneducated, etc., you can parade a few conversations with Alan out which
will quickly prove otherwise.
I'm hoping to inspire (Alan) to support his thoughts and contribute meaningful information.
So you are MAGA now?
Give me your best guess.
I'm hoping to inspire (Alan) to support his thoughts and contribute
meaningful information.
That has been tried before. Maybe you will finally be the successful one. Here's hoping.
In 2020, I didn't really like Trump but voted for him because Joe Biden was obviously having mental decline issues (which, guess what, the Democrats finally admitted to)
In 2024, I don't really like Trump but believe the same things I did about Harris that I did in 2020, except now I have the benefit of seeing her act pretty overwhelmed in the mostly do-nothing office of Vice President. I
also believe the few policies that she has actually stated will only make inflation worse.
So MAGA I am not.
Aaron said women were getting abortions "at the DNC"
That seems pretty simple to me, are you having trouble with it?
So you are MAGA now?
Give me your best guess.
That seems pretty simple to me, are you having trouble with it?
Alan knock it off... They were... kinda...
They stopped posting their kills because I was posting their results.
Make Affordable Groceries Again
American people just want to feed their kids...
older man and he moves like an older man. I would still trust his mind over Trump.
I think the policies of project 2025 will drive inflation up and taxes
for Americans, except of course for the 1%.
older man and he moves like an older man. I would still trust his mind
over Trump.
He referred to Kamala and Tim as "Kamala and Jim." It was hilarious.
It's also funny how he's endorsing a VP nominee without even knowing his name.
I think the policies of project 2025 will drive inflation up and taxes
for Americans, except of course for the 1%.
What about the policies of The Purge?
I'm afraid that they might drive up inflation too.
Abortions are not "kills". All I ask is that you call it what it is.
Republicans are to busy making it harder to vote and easier to cheat on elections to care in any way about the American people.
He referred to Kamala and Tim as "Kamala and Jim." It was hilarious.
Did he really. That is funny.
Like Trump called his VP JD Mandel? That's funny too, it is hilarious.
I think the policies of project 2025 will drive inflation up and taxes >> for Americans, except of course for the 1%.
What about the policies of The Purge?
What "policies of The Purge"? Sounds like hollywood.
Are you talking about the way republican's want to purge the voters off the voter rolls?
You like Google so much, well, try Google's dictionary:
kill:
1) cause the death of
Under these definitions, an abortion is as much of a kill as the kill command in the linux terminal.
If you go back a few messages in this echo, Ron explained a problem that we're having with election integrity.
Believe it or not, but there are some Americans who actually think that only citizens should vote in our elections.
I know, the audacity.
But anyway, it's those lunatics who are trying to make it more difficult for foreign-born Americans to vote in our elections.
That's not as funny because JD Mandell is another Republican who Trump has endorsed.
What "policies of The Purge"? Sounds like hollywood.
"The Purge" is fiction,
just like "Project 2025."
If you liked Project 2025, you'll love "The Blair Witch Project."
Are you talking about the way republican's want to purge the voters off
the voter rolls?
Do you think that deceased voters should remain on the voter rolls so that people can continue to cast ballots on their behalf?
I believe that America is great already and that "Make America Great Again" is nothing more than a bumper sticker or words on a red hat.
"The Purge" is fiction,
Ah, that's what I thought.
just like "Project 2025."
Project 2025 is not fiction. I can send you a copy.
The issue is that republicans are removing voters who are alive and well.
Republicans are to busy making it harder to vote and easier to cheat on elections to care in any way about the American people.
In 2020, I didn't really like Trump but voted for him because Joe Biden was obviously having mental decline issues (which, guess what, the Democrats finally admitted to)
Did they?
Alan knock it off... They were... kinda... The truck was at the event. it was
parked at the event it had a permit to be at the event and offered services at
the event.
Project 2025 is not fiction. I can send you a copy.
Sending me a copy of a fictional set of policies doesn't make it real.
I can send you a copy of The Purge.
The issue is that republicans are removing voters who are alive and well.
I didn't know about that issue until now. How are they removing them?
You are mixed up... Republicans are making it harder to cheat and easier to vote.
In 2020, I didn't really like Trump but voted for him because Joe Biden was >> > obviously having mental decline issues (which, guess what, the Democrats >> > finally admitted to)
Did they?
Yes, they certainly did.
Their donors did, too. That has been discussed here, including plenty of names and sources.
You ignored them then and I am sure you'd ignore them now.
ALAN: Where you'd get that bar-b-q? Smells great.
CO-WORKER: Down at the convention center.
ALAN: Where you'd get that bar-b-q? Smells great.
CO-WORKER: Down at the convention center.
Project 2025 is not fiction. Denial is not a river in Egypt.
The issue is that republicans are removing voters who are alive and wel
I didn't know about that issue until now. How are they removing them?
This is happening in Georgia and there are similar stories around the country.
It's not policy, it's not a policy proposal from elected officials, it's not a policy proposal from political candidates. If it's not fiction then what is it then?
Denial actually *is* a river in Egypt.
This is happening in Georgia and there are similar stories around the
country.
As shocking as it may seem to you, you're wrong, Al. There's a voter cancellation form that can be used to cancel your voter registration, but there's no "Republicans removing voters."
https://sos.ga.gov/sites/default/files/2024-06/GA%20Voter%20Registration%20Can
ellation%20Form.pdf
It's a smart thing to allow voters to cancel their voter registration. This helps prevent voter fraud. So far, nobody has complained about being removed against their will, so all this is just squawkery.
You are mixed up... Republicans are making it harder to cheat and easier vote.
I would have no problem with that, but that is not the case.
In 2020, I didn't really like Trump but voted for him because Joe Biden was >> > obviously having mental decline issues (which, guess what, the Democrats >> > finally admitted to)
Did they?
Yes, they certainly did.
Joe Biden stepped down, it was a choice he made because he thought that was best for the party/country.
Their donors did, too. That has been discussed here, including plenty of names and sources.
Donations dried up, that might have played into Joe's decision making.
You ignored them then and I am sure you'd ignore them now.
I ignore bullshit.
You are mixed up... Republicans are making it harder to cheat and easier >> > vote.
I would have no problem with that, but that is not the case.
This was a headline that cam across my feed...
BREAKING: Texas Governor Greg Abbott Removes Over One Million Ineligible Voters,
Including Nearly 500,000 Dead People
and Thousands of Non-Citizen from State - Voter Rolls
Republicans simply say... Don't mail out ballots that are not requested.
If Trump gets in and he starts his mass deportation program... He should focus on the bad people... Rapist and murderers...
and the people who illegally vote during Federal elections.
It is a policy proposal. It is not the first of it's kind from the heritage foundation but it is the latest targeted at 2025 as the title suggests.
As shocking as it may seem to you, you're wrong, Al. There's a voter cancellation form that can be used to cancel your voter registration, bu there's no "Republicans removing voters."
Yes, it is happening. Here's another link for you. These stories are all over the web. Look it up.
Wesley Wilcox says it is happening. Look it up.
The Heritage Foundation can propose anything they want, but they have no authority in the US government.
Wesley Wilcox has no authority in the state of Georgia. He's a Floridian.
https://tinyurl.com/2vv8b98j
As far as the story I was talking with Aaron about, I don't know if anything like that is happening in Texas, I haven't read or seen
anything like that but I wouldn't be surprised.
Sometimes elections are called with a few hundred votes. If dead people are voting it's not fare to the citizen casting their vote.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
It's not policy, it's not a policy proposal from elected officials,
it's not a policy proposal from political candidates. If it's not
fiction then what is it then?
being removed against their will, so all this is just squawkery.
It's not policy, it's not a policy proposal from elected officials, it's not a policy proposal from political candidates. If it's not fiction then what is it then?
But that's all these people can do: Push their false Narrative. They
seem to think that if they repeat the lie enough times, it becomes true.
Kamala Harris Slayer Tulsi Gabbard Endorses President Trump Just Days After RFK Jr.
The issue is that republicans are removing voters who are alive and well.
I didn't know about that issue until now. How are they removing them?
Republicans are to busy making it harder to vote and easier to cheat on elections to care in any way about the American people.
You are mixed up... Republicans are making it harder to cheat and easier to vote.
Republicans simply say... Don't mail out ballots that are not requested.
That is the way mail in voting works here.
If Trump gets in and he starts his mass deportation program... He should focus on the bad people... Rapist and murderers...
I'm not sure there will be a mass deportation program unless project 2025 proves to be real and is actioned upon.
and the people who illegally vote during Federal elections.
That doesn't happen, and if it do you could arrest/deport those people now.
Dead people don't vote for reasons that are mostly obvious.
Dead people don't vote for reasons that are mostly obvious.
There are very few cases were folks have voted twice, usually voting on behalf of a dead person and not enough to throw an election.
When these people are found out there are generally consequences.
I actually thought that she had already done that, but maybe not officially as I saw that headline also.
If someone put me and my spouse on a air flight risk list just because I exercised my First Amendment rights (and said something they didn't
like), I would be endorsing the other candidate, too.
That depends on which Republicans we are talking about. My state SOS is doing just that. Others are indeed trying to make it more difficult
by claiming that restriting voting to one day is somehow safer, and are trying to make it easier to cheat by claiming that hand-counted paper ballots are the only safe way to go.
I didn't know about that issue until now. How are they removing them?
In most cases they are not. Here, they sent out letters informing people who'd not voted in a long time that they needed to update their address information with voter registration or they'd be removed. If they responded that they were still in the state, they were not removed.
Yes, that was a Republican governor's administration.
Now, here is how the DEMOCRATS used to do it here.
If you did not vote for 4 consecutive years, they would send you a letter telling you that you *have been removed* -- note that is NOT will be removed, but have already been. They would also inform you that, in
order to re-register, you would have to pay a fine.
So any idea that *only* Republicans do such things is typical British Columbian Bologna.
Only sending them to people who request them is somehow a Republican conspiracy to prevent people from voting.
Trump has indicated there will be deportations, independently of, and before the Project 2025 hogwash came to light.
That doesn't happen, and if it do you could arrest/deport those people now.
That does happen, and people do get prosecuted for it (if they get caught).
They are not always Democrats,
either, and they are often citizens (which means you cannot deport them).
* SLMR 2.1a * This message brought to you by JAMMITIN (tm)!!
Dead people don't vote for reasons that are mostly obvious.
There have been cases over the years where votes were cast on behalf of
dead people who were still on the register.
When these people are found out there are generally consequences.
I don't know if your understanding on this is intentional or... Whatever... It maybe a recessive gene that runs in your family.
In the registered voters there are about 3% of those registered should not be registered. There are a few reasons behind this. Voters are dead,
have moved
or are not citizens among some of the reasons.
Florida has issues with snowbirds voting twice... People live in New York 6 months out of the year and Florida 6 months out of the year. They register to vote in both places and cast ballots in both places.
Florida checks for this and deals with it.
I guess it's not uncommon.
Half of the votes for Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election are from dead people.
Half of the votes for Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election are
from dead people.
I think it safe to stop there.
IB Joe wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
You ignore reality and facts... And I have put too much effort into someone like you.
Project 2025 is hardly hogwash.
I don't know what part of..
"When these people are found out there are generally consequences".
is giving you trouble.
All good, if these voters have passed on go ahead and remove them.
have moved
Yes, these voters need to arrange their voter registration.
or are not citizens among some of the reasons.
If they are not citizens they should not be registered to vote at all.
This could be an issue, how does a non citizen get registered to vote in the first place? There is an error here that needs fixing.
Half of the votes for Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election are fr dead people.
I think it safe to stop there.
Which is why I long ago stopped responding to the Ignorant Elitists.
Next time you come to the states, tell people that you're scared to
death of Project 2025. They will help keep you safe from it.
Get the F%$K out and vote
In most cases they are not. Here, they sent out letters informing people
who'd not voted in a long time that they needed to update their address information with voter registration or they'd be removed. If they responded that they were still in the state, they were not removed.
Yes, that was a Republican governor's administration.
That's not bad! I never cancelled my voter registration in New Mexico when I moved to New York. Surely some Democrat in New Mexico is harvesting that apple
Now, here is how the DEMOCRATS used to do it here.
If you did not vote for 4 consecutive years, they would send you a letter
telling you that you *have been removed* -- note that is NOT will be removed, but have already been. They would also inform you that, in order to re-register, you would have to pay a fine.
That's funny! "Pay us money if you ever want to vote again! Sincerely, the Democrats." :)
So any idea that *only* Republicans do such things is typical British Columbian Bologna.
He's got a lot of ridiculous propaganda dancing around in his head. I just hop
he doesn't get caught up in any riots because they're looking for guys like him.
Only sending them to people who request them is somehow a Republican conspiracy to prevent people from voting.
I don't see any conspiracy here.
Trump has indicated there will be deportations, independently of, and before
the Project 2025 hogwash came to light.
There are deportations already. I read that the Biden admin has deported more people at the border than the Trump admin did.
I don't watch the border. I'm not sure how true hat is.
Project 2025 is hardly hogwash.
Dead people don't vote for reasons that are mostly obvious.
There have been cases over the years where votes were cast on behalf of dead people who were still on the register.
Yes, I have seen these stories.
That's why it is important the people who have passed are removed from the voter rolls as IB Joe was saying is happening or has happened in texas.
It is just as important that the living are not removed as long as they are legitimate voters.
Headline
JUST IN: Democrats Panic After Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Green Party Candidate Jill Stein Can Remain on Ballot in Crucial Swing State
Democrats tried to remove Jill from the ballot in Wisconsin... Why?? because she'll take away votes from the Democrats.... This is democracy??
Project 2025 is hardly hogwash.
Next time you come to the states, tell people that you're scared to death of Project 2025. They will help keep you safe from it.
I don't know what part of..
"When these people are found out there are generally consequences".
is giving you trouble.
Generally, no consequences...
Project 2025 is hardly hogwash.
Believing that if Trump deports people, then he is following Project 2025
and not his own promises *is* hogwash,
especially if you also admit to knowing that Biden has also been deporting people. Does that mean Biden is following Project 2025 now, too?
Projects to remove deceased (and moved away) voters are often blocked by Democrats.
Sometime during 2016-19, our current governor was the state AG
and he did just that when he sucessfully blocked a project to remove the deceased and moved-away. As a result, deceased voters got added back to
the rolls.
It is just as important that the living are not removed as long as they are >> legitimate voters.
In the example above, the project AG Bashear blocked was attempting to
notify voters, before removing them, that they needed to update their information. He blocked it anyway even though, in past, the state (under Democrat control) had removed people *before* notifying them.
he doesn't get caught up in any riots because they're looking for guys l him.
I don't think he'd do that. I do remember, though, that he claimed in several messages that "antifa doesn't exist" while claiming in at least one other that he knew a couple of younger people who were in "a group" that was involved in a lot of protesting in the NW and he was worried
for their safety.
I do often wonder where he gets his news. There is stuff that shows up
in the mainstream media that he seems unaware of, and also unwilling to accept when provided the evidence that it was indeed reported on by multiple sources.
The republican party has a long record of removing the living from the voter rolls. They don't seem to want (some) people voting.
The republican party has a long record of removing the living from the
voter rolls. They don't seem to want (some) people voting.
How long is "long?" When and where did this happen? And which Republican(s) were involved?
Or did the reporter you're parroting forget to give you those details?
That goes back to something that (I think) I posted yesterday. The gap
in the sexes amoung US youth is growing at a rate not seen before between young men and young women. Young men are trending much more Republican than in a long time, but that group - young men - are also some of the least likely to vote.
One would hope that is because, in past, they were trending more Democrat but were just not motivated to vote for the Democrat candidates. I have
a feeling that is not the only reason, though, and that whether or not they turn out to vote in 2024 could be what determines the election.
There are a lot of social media campaigns to get young women out to vote Democrat, and that demographic seems very motivated to do so. If the young men don't also get out to vote, that would be a big part of a
Kamala path to victory.
The sad thing is that the Democrats were also the ones fighting to keep RFK Jr off the ballot in several states, even though he was predicted to take more votes away from Trump than the Democrats.
I have a difficult time believing them when they claim to stand for Democracy when they turn around and do things like this.
I understand the AG (I think you know him) in Texas has been raiding Latino civil rights organizations. It's beeing called voter intimidation.
I understand the AG (I think you know him) in Texas has been raiding
Latino civil rights organizations. It's beeing called voter intimidation.
No.
I could squawk all day about California, but nah, it's somebody else's problem.
I could squawk all day about California, but nah, it's somebody else's problem.
California has it's problems as every state does to one degree or
another but it is also highly successful.
California has it's problems as every state does to one degree or
another but it is also highly successful.
What do you mean by successful? The media has been reporting a lot of businesses leaving California.
But of course that might be just a bunch of lies, and maybe businesses are not leaving California. It's hard to know for sure what's happening in a state without living in it, very, very hard to know.
But not everyone has the same definition of every word. Would "successful" describe a state losing it's businesses to other states? Someone wishing for socialism or for the bringing down of a country might call that "success."
California has it's problems as every state does to one degree or
another but it is also highly successful.
Some businesses are leaving California for tax and regulation reasons.
I understand that "Socialist" is Donald Trumps favorite word but California is not a socialist state and nor has California done anything like "bringing down a country".
Project 2025 is hardly hogwash.
Believing that if Trump deports people, then he is following Project 2025 and not his own promises *is* hogwash,
Oh, I believe Trump when he says he is going to do a mass deportation.
Trump would/will do that regardless of project 2025.
Projects to remove deceased (and moved away) voters are often blocked by Democrats.
That is regular maintenance, or at least it should be.
In the example above, the project AG Bashear blocked was attempting to notify voters, before removing them, that they needed to update their information. He blocked it anyway even though, in past, the state (under Democrat control) had removed people *before* notifying them.
There is no need to notify dead people, go ahead and remove them.
It is OK to keep addresses and what not current, but living voters should not be removed.
I do often wonder where he gets his news. There is stuff that shows up in the mainstream media that he seems unaware of, and also unwilling to accept when provided the evidence that it was indeed reported on by multiple sources.
I have a suspicion that he (and some other weird Fidonet guys) have a sick obsession with Janis K, the leftie gal. They went berserk when she announced that she was retiring from "The Fido Gazette." Grown men, some in their 70s, were hurling insults at one another at first until the dust settled and good o
Sean took over as "publisher" of that "highly important publication."
Early voting in some states start soon... first week or so in September... Thi
is why I think early early voting is stupid. If you don't follow politics enough and you pull the lever for Kamala before you found out what she's truly
about... your loss.
What they are doing with her is calculated. If Trump does a good job at the debate I'm sure it will end her political career.
I understand the AG (I think you know him) in Texas has been raiding Latino civil rights organizations. It's beeing called voter intimidation.
I understand that "Socialist" is Donald Trumps favorite word but California is not a socialist state and nor has California done anything like "bringing down a country".
Some businesses are leaving California for tax and regulation reasons.
I get it. California used to have a successful economy.
Trump would/will do that regardless of project 2025.
That was my logic. Yours was "if Trump does a mass deporation, it is a
sign he is following Project 2025."
There is no need to notify dead people, go ahead and remove them.
It is OK to keep addresses and what not current, but living voters should not >> be removed.
In the USA, if a voter MOVES they are REQUIRED to re-register because they are likely no longer in the same district, and especially if they move out-of-state. If they do not re-register, it is not the government's fault but their own fault for not following directions.
I understand the AG (I think you know him) in Texas has been raiding Latino >> civil rights organizations. It's beeing called voter intimidation.
Link?
Law enforcement in California... the LA area especially but not only... has not done a good job at all keeping theives from targeting rail shipments.
It has become so bad that the rail companies are moving their intermodal yards far away from the cities they are currently near.
Some businesses are leaving California for tax and regulation reasons.
I get it. California used to have a successful economy.
That is a lie. California and New York both have successful econimies.
I think it's safe to stop there.
In the USA, if a voter MOVES they are REQUIRED to re-register because th are likely no longer in the same district, and especially if they move out-of-state. If they do not re-register, it is not the government's fa but their own fault for not following directions.
That is all well and good.
However what is happening is folks who have not moved or changed much of anything being removed.
I don't know. Is this enough to appease the leftist gods? They might want you to take these false claims to the next level.
However what is happening is folks who have not moved or changed much of
anything being removed.
Tell us their names.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
I get it. California used to have a successful economy. My state used
to have one too. Businesses are definitely leaving my state, and the
media suggests that it's due to high taxes, but I honestly have no
clue.
Some people think of it as a bad word, but I don't. It's just an
economic system that in some cases benefits people equally.
However what is happening is folks who have not moved or changed much o >> anything being removed.
Tell us their names.
You want me to tell you their names!?
I'll tell you one. Daniel Moss. His place on the voter roll was
challenged as ineligible by a group called free the vote.
His name and thousands of others.
Do a little reaserch, would ya?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKFALtjiS_8&t=27s
Some people think of it as a bad word, but I don't. It's just an economic system that in some cases benefits people equally.
Socialism has **never** benefited people equally. It claims to do so,
but never does. The end result is **always** an Elite class that lives
in luxury and a non-elite class that lives in poverty.
There's a good reason why you can only tell me 1 name,
and that's because this ridiculous CNN "report" only tells 1 name. You're falling for BS. BS is slippery when it's fresh, but by the end of the day it dries up and no longer poses a slip hazard.
There are times when videos show evidence of things, but this video shows no evidence of anything. If you were a court judge, there would be major protests outside your courtroom on a daily basis. They'd call you "Judge BS."
Trump would/will do that regardless of project 2025.
That was my logic. Yours was "if Trump does a mass deporation, it is a sign he is following Project 2025."
Trump would/will implement much of project 2025 as well.
Law enforcement in California... the LA area especially but not only... has not done a good job at all keeping theives from targeting rail shipments. It has become so bad that the rail companies are moving their intermodal yards far away from the cities they are currently near.
Maybe the the rail companies need to secure their operations and work with law
w enfocement when needed.
Law enforcement is not the problem here.
Some people think of it as a bad word, but I don't. It's just an economic system that in some cases benefits people equally.
Socialism has **never** benefited people equally. It claims to do so, but never does. The end result is **always** an Elite class that lives in luxury and a non-elite class that lives in poverty.
That is a lie. California and New York both have successful econimies.
I think it's safe to stop there.
I think it's safe to stop there.
Law enforcement is not the problem here.
There is not a whole lot a private company (or citizen) can do if the local DAs won't prosecute the crimes.
Taking the law into their own hands would be illegal.
So I half-agree with you. Local LEOs may not be the problem, but the local DA offices sure are.
That is a lie. California and New York both have successful econimies.
I think it's safe to stop there.
No they don.... Both are failing... Both have people moving out of the state..
Recently Elon moved all his California holding out of California to Texas...
Chevron Oil is also moving from California. All complaining about regulations and high taxes...
and poop on the street.... Ohhhh and Silvester Stallone... among many others are moving out as well.
There are more people leaving California and moving in... The wealth is leaving.
The same is happening in New York. Major financial firms are bugging out and moving to Texas, as did Elon, where there is no state income tax.
I think it's safe to stop there.
Don't tell me what to do...
Recently Elon moved all his California holding out of California to
Texas...
That is likely for "regulation reasons". Regulations are a good thing
when they are about best practices. If companies would keep up best practises without regulations than regulations would not be needed.
I wish those MAGA idiots would sometime learn about factchecking.
People move for various reasons. That doesn't mean the state has failed.
Chevron Oil is also moving from California. All complaining about regulations and high taxes...
Regulations and taxes are not reason to complain.
Foot Locker Flees New York's Crushing Taxes, Relocates Headquarters to Business-Friendly Florida
Several companies are leaving/left California and New York citing not just any reason... as you might imply.... But because of the Tax and Regulatory burden.Banning books and deregulation are not solutions.
I forget get what city it is... one of these 3 in Texas... Austin, Dalis or Huston... filed this year to be a financial HUB for the south. Seems that a lot of major banks and trading firms are moving to Texas... Not just for any reason... They are citing Taxes and high Regulations.
You sit in an other country on the other side of the continent and you tell Aaron who actually lives in New York that doesn't know what he's talking about.
BTW, McDonalds is thinking of leaving Chicago... an other liberal Sh!t Hole... citing High Taxes, Regulations and Crime.
When these companies leave they take the taxes they once paid, in this case Illinois, and go to a more favorable place... Like Texas and Florida where there is no state income tax.
BTW, California was/is the 5th largest economy in the world. They once had tax revenue surpluses... now they have deficits in the 100s of billions.
Sometimes you just say the stupidest stuff... And you don't support your claim and you try to tell the people who are living in the failed state to ignore what they see and hear.
Chevron Oil is also moving from California. All complaining about
regulations and high taxes...
Regulations and taxes are not reason to complain.
They said they are leaving for those reasons...
If theives find a weakness they will exploit it. That is true in your local neighborhood as it is in the rail yards. Rail yards may be able to invest wher
needed to make that exploitation hard, or less valuable to thieves in their haul.
There's a good reason why you can only tell me 1 name,
Why should I give you any names?
I forget get what city it is... one of these 3 in Texas... Austin, Dalis or >> Huston... filed this year to be a financial HUB for the south. Seems that a >> lot of major banks and trading firms are moving to Texas... Not just for any
reason... They are citing Taxes and high Regulations.
If I was running a business the bottom line would be a key point in my decisio
making and location.
Several companies are leaving/left California and New York citing not ju any reason... as you might imply.... But because of the Tax and Regulato burden.Banning books and deregulation are not solutions.
If I was running a business the bottom line would be a key point in my decision making and location.
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he is talking about. I told him New York was a successful state, because that is what it is.
McDonalds is already a low quality outfit. I wouldn't go there at all if they didn't have regulations.
Why should I give you any names?
To prove your point?
Several companies are leaving/left California and New York citing not ju >> > any reason... as you might imply.... But because of the Tax and Regulato >> > burden.Banning books and deregulation are not solutions.
WTF does that have to do with what I said...
And it's why they move... The bottom line... it's better to do business anywhere other than Demicrat Sh!t Holes...
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he is talking about. I told
him New York was a successful state, because that is what it is.
You did... Aaron lives in New York and sees the failing state first hand and you tell him it's not a failing state... but he lives there... and you don't.
Who cares the quality... The largest fast food restaurant in the world is moving it's HQ from Chicago and going to a more favorable state and with that they'll take with them... employees and tax revenue.
WTF does your argument have to do with anything. New York and California are hemorrhaging their Tax Base...
Silvester Stallone announced that he is moving to Florida citing Taxes,
crime and woke stuff...
I know people move for many reasons... but my god... FOCUS!!
Regulations are not burdensome and neither are books!
Regulations are not burdensome and neither are books!
Regulations are extremely burdensome....
costly and can cause excessive delays...
The Biden and Harris wanted to build charging stations for electric cars... spent BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars and built 4... Because the regulations required DEI, among other things... and that's all they got with the money the spent.
Trump reduces regulations to speedup the process of Making America Great Again.
You sit in an other country on the other side of the continent and you t Aaron who actually lives in New York that doesn't know what he's talking about.
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he is talking about. I told him New York was a successful state, because that is what it is.
You did... Aaron lives in New York and sees the failing state first hand you tell him it's not a failing state... but he lives there... and you d
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he talking about.
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he is talking about. I told
him New York was a successful state, because that is what it is.
That's like me telling you that British Columbia is a terrible place where syringes litter the streets, nobody recycles, and everybody is high all the time.
That might be how the media describes it, but since I've never lived
there, I won't parrot what they say about it, and since we're all BBS buddies, I would take your word for it when you tell me stuff about it.
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he talking about.
You did, but you said it in a nice way.
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he is talking about. I told >> him New York was a successful state, because that is what it is.
That's like me telling you that British Columbia is a terrible place whe syringes litter the streets, nobody recycles, and everybody is high all time.
There are places like that, an area called the downtown eastside
resembles your description. Exteme poverty and drugs galore, I've seen
it myself.
That area covers 10 square blocks and does not represent British
Columbia.
Nope, I never did. I'm sure Aaron knows New York very well. I just said that New York was a successful state. I'm sure New York has it's issues
as well as California, BC and many places but it is not a failure.
That area covers 10 square blocks and does not represent British
Columbia.
I have to insist that the downtown east side of Vancouver is "highly successful." I've never been there, but I've been to a lot of websites.
Successful is a vague word. Successful recycling program? Yes. Successful snow plow service? Yes. Successful economy? No.
New York State has a debt of $55.9 billion dollars.
New York, California, and Hawaii (all leftie controlled states) have the highest state debt out of all of the 50 states. Successful at being in debt? Yes.
I wish those MAGA idiots would sometime learn about factchecking.
New York State has a debt of $55.9 billion dollars.
Most people also carry debt.
That doesn't strike me as a lot for a state with a GDP around 2
trillion. Or am I mistaken about that?
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
I agree, but the working class can consider themselves to be "equal." Equally getting the short end of the stick.
IB Joe wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
That is a lie. California and New York both have successful econimies.
No they don.... Both are failing... Both have people moving out of the state... Recently Elon moved all his California holding out of
California to Texas... Chevron Oil is also moving from California. All complaining about regulations and high taxes... and poop on the
street.... Ohhhh and Silvester Stallone... among many others are moving out as well. There are more people leaving California and moving in... The wealth is leaving.
IB Joe wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
BTW, McDonalds is thinking of leaving Chicago... an other liberal Sh!t Hole... citing High Taxes, Regulations and Crime. When these companies leave they take the taxes they once paid,
IB Joe wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
On 31 Aug 2024, Alan Ianson said the following...
Several companies are leaving/left California and New York citing not ju any reason... as you might imply.... But because of the Tax and Regulato burden.Banning books and deregulation are not solutions.
WTF does that have to do with what I said...
New York State has a debt of $55.9 billion dollars.
Most people also carry debt.
That doesn't strike me as a lot for a state with a GDP around 2
trillion. Or am I mistaken about that?
Are these debts out of control?
For instance, what do the $1.9T tax credits given to the
corporations and billionaires by the MAGA administration actually mean
to the (yearly average as reported by the IRS) 85M US taxpayers?
Why should I give you any names?
To prove your point?
I am not making a point.
Aaron can take it or leave it.
Several companies are leaving/left California and New York citing not ju >AI> > any reason... as you might imply.... But because of the Tax and Regulato >AI> > burden.Banning books and deregulation are not solutions.
WTF does that have to do with what I said...
costly and can cause excessive delays...
Regulations cost nothing and cause no delays.
Following regulations may add costs and/or delays but they are there for a reason.
New York State has a debt of $55.9 billion dollars.
Most people also carry debt.
We like having businesses and we like having jobs.
Democrats like converting shopping malls into welfare offices.
That doesn't strike me as a lot for a state with a GDP around 2
trillion. Or am I mistaken about that?
It's better than Hawaii's debt to GDP ratio by comparison, but how much better would it be if Democrats didn't push all the major brands out of the state?
Since Kathy Hochul's rogue regime took over, now businesses are being sued for hundreds of millions of dollars just for breaking bank policies.
Are these debts out of control?
It is out of control. Not just in New York, but in every Democrat state.
I am not making a point.
While that is often the case, here the point you were allegedly making was that a claim of yours has evidence.
Aaron can take it or leave it.
In other words, just take your totally biased word for it.
No thanks.
Banning books and deregulation are not solutions.
WTF does that have to do with what I said...
It is a deflection.
Regulations cost nothing and cause no delays.
Following regulations may add costs and/or delays but they are there for a >> reason.
Which means they cost something. Duh.
Which is why they are moving their yards out of the high-crime, low-prosecution, Democrat-controlled urban areas of CA and into the relative country side.If they wonder off too far they might step foot into the Badlands only to be never seen again.
Regulations are neseccary. In most cases they spell out best practises.
Regulations cost nothing and cause no delays.
Following regulations may add costs and/or delays but they are there for
a reason.
What regulation requires DEI?
Trump has succeeded in making some Americans hate again.
But remember that Alan thinks only what he's told to think. He's unable to think for himself. All evidence that goes against what he's been
told to think is "false news", or "conspiracy theory".
That's why these Ignorant Elitists disappear every so often. The
evidence that they were wrong is so strong that it can no longer be denied. So they have to go back to their masters and be told what to think.
Hence why they will deny saying something when we all have records of
them saying it.
WTF does that have to do with what I said...
It is a deflection.
Regulations are neseccary. In most cases they spell out best practises.
Over regulation is bad and stifles growth.
Regulations cost nothing and cause no delays.
Regulations cost tones... Large corporations love them because smaller companies can't afford them...
Latest was DEI... how F#$king stupid is that...
U have to hire a 1 legged black hermaphrodite with pronouns to make sure you're represented.
Following regulations may add costs and/or delays but they are there for
a reason.
Regulations are the main reason... it takes 15 to 20 years to build a road sometime because they are worried about a frog or a snail.
I have a buddy who builds homes and he says that about 1/3 of the price of building a new home is based on regulations....
Do you have a clue what you're talking about??
What regulation requires DEI?
For Democrats its having to hire weird people, a lot of the times unfit or unqualified for the job... Trump redefined it to Deport Every Illegal...
Trump has succeeded in making some Americans hate again.
Nope... It's the left that hates... Go to a Trump rally... they dance and sing patriotic songs.
We like having businesses and we like having jobs.
We? We, who? We, the brainwashed MAGA cult members? That I can
believe. But the 40M living under the poverty level would rather pay the ultra-rich than be able to spend the money on their local shops and servicemen? Hardly.
Jobs? 3M lost their jobs during #45. The only president in modern history who left office with fewer jobs. Yeah, it didn't work out well, did it?
How much do you pay in taxes, BTW?
Democrats like converting shopping malls into welfare offices.
Holy Smoke. Are you for real?
Oh, you forgot about all the satanic orgies where they eat babies and drink their blood. Maybe in the malls, then?
It's better than Hawaii's debt to GDP ratio by comparison, but how much better would it be if Democrats didn't push all the major brands out of state?
I don't think democrats are pushing people out. Some may choose to go elsewhere. That's fine.
Since Kathy Hochul's rogue regime took over, now businesses are being su for hundreds of millions of dollars just for breaking bank policies.
I couldn't find any info about this.
Since Kathy Hochul's rogue regime took over, now businesses are being su >> > for hundreds of millions of dollars just for breaking bank policies.
I couldn't find any info about this.
I'm referring to Trump's "civil fraud trial."
I'm aware of Trumps civil fraud trial and conviction. He'll be sentenced in a few weeks.
It wasn't about bank policy, Trump's actions were against state law.
What has that got to do with Kathy Hochul?
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
He's like a dog chasing his tail...
You show him some facts... he
changes his argument.... show him facts about what that can't be the case... He changes his argument again... and so on and so forth,
IB Joe wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
What regulation requires DEI?
For Democrats its having to hire weird people, a lot of the times unfit
or unqualified for the job... Trump redefined it to Deport Every Illegal...
Banning books and deregulation are not solutions.
WTF does that have to do with what I said...
It is a deflection.
Delection? Banning books is all the rage today.
Regulations cost nothing and cause no delays.
Following regulations may add costs and/or delays but they are there for a >> reason.
Which means they cost something. Duh.
Lack of regulations also cost something. Duh.
Which is why they are moving their yards out of the high-crime, low-prosecution, Democrat-controlled urban areas of CA and into the relative country side.If they wonder off too far they might step foot into the Badlands only to be never seen again.
Since Kathy Hochul's rogue regime took over, now businesses are being sued for hundreds of millions of dollars just for breaking bank policies.
I couldn't find any info about this.
Since Kathy Hochul's rogue regime took over, now businesses are being su >AI> > for hundreds of millions of dollars just for breaking bank policies.
I couldn't find any info about this.
I'm referring to Trump's "civil fraud trial."
https://apnews.com/article/trump-fraud-letitia-james-new-york-engoron-38bc3a7f
ccb22555c026e9bf70fd5bb
The regulations don't cost anything. Doing things right might add costs. Doing things wrong will also add costs.
I have never seen any road take that long.
For Democrats its having to hire weird people, a lot of the times unfit unqualified for the job... Trump redefined it to Deport Every Illegal...
That is not DEI.
Delection? Banning books is all the rage today.
He wasn't talking about banning books. If you want to start a separate thread about that...
Just FYI, wanting the books in a childrens' school library to be age appropriate is not "banning books." Banning them means they cannot be legally found anywhere and I am not aware of anyone doing that. Please
post some links to enlighten us.
Go ahead and try to speak for millions of people who live in a country that you don't live in.
I'm beginning to realize that's typical leftie behavior.
Go ahead and try to speak for millions of people who live in a countr that you don't live in.
Typical projection. *YOU* were the one who pretended to speak for
other people.
Unless you are megalomaniacal enough to use pluralis majestatis, "we" means more than you. So I asked you who *YOU* try to speak for.
First of all, I'm not a leftie, I've always written with my right
hand.
Secondly, projection is the hallmark of the MAGA cult members, as decreed by their cult leader, the Orange Jesus.
Just FYI, wanting the books in a childrens' school library to be age appropriate is not "banning books." Banning them means they cannot be legally found anywhere and I am not aware of anyone doing that. Please post some links to enlighten us.
You haven't heard about the book bans? The info is out there, have a look.
Unless you are megalomaniacal enough to use pluralis majestatis, "we"
means more than you. So I asked you who *YOU* try to speak for.
Oh, I forgot. I was distracted by all that speaking for 40M people that you were doing.
Unless you are megalomaniacal enough to use pluralis majestatis,
means more than you. So I asked you who *YOU* try to speak for.
Oh, I forgot. I was distracted by all that speaking for 40M people th you were doing.
Ah yes, another infamous MAGA hallmark. Never answer a direct question. If you can't lie, deflect.
"Deflection is a defense mechanism characterized by redirecting a conversation away from a challenging topic or issue to something less emotionally charged."
Shall we give it another try?
Who are the "we" that you claim to represent?
Aaron Thomas -> Bj”rn Felten skrev 2024-09-03 01:03:
Unless you are megalomaniacal enough to use pluralis majestatis, "
means more than you. So I asked you who *YOU* try to speak for.
Oh, I forgot. I was distracted by all that speaking for 40M people tha
you were doing.
Ah yes, another infamous MAGA hallmark. Never answer a direct
question. If you can't lie, deflect.
You haven't heard about the book bans? The info is out there, have a look.
Aside from some "third party" rubbish,
the only (not) bans I have heard about, or seen any information on, are groups trying to make sure that their kids' school libraries are age appropriate for their kids' age and not adults.
Now, I am aware of a leftist movement a few recent years back where they protested and protested and got some Dr. Seuss books effectively banned.
Is that what you are talking about?
* SLMR 2.1a * "My eyeballs nearly popped out!"
Book bans are indeed all the rage in some places today.
Book bans diminish the quality of education students have access to and restrict their exposure to important persepectives that form the fabric
of a culturaly pluralist society (like the United States).
Books are a form of media, and can be used as a mode of propagation. Books about mathematics, science, programming languages, punctuation, vocabulary, etc are safe enough to be shared with children, but it's books in the literature, history, and sociology categories that need to be reviewed by parents first, to make sure that the education system isn't trying to molest their brains.
Who are the "we" that you claim to represent?
I speak for myself and not for other people.
We like having businesses and we like having jobs.
When I mention the 40M US people living under the poverty level, I
am the one pretending to be speaking of behalf of those people?
We like having businesses and we like having jobs.
You haven't heard about the book bans? The info is out there, have a look.
Aside from some "third party" rubbish,
What third parties do you speak of?
the only (not) bans I have heard about, or seen any information on, are groups trying to make sure that their kids' school libraries are age appropriate for their kids' age and not adults.
Oh yeah, I'm on board. I don't think school libraries need to have porn on the
shelves.
Of course we both know that is not happening.
Book bans are indeed all the rage in some places today.
Now, I am aware of a leftist movement a few recent years back where they protested and protested and got some Dr. Seuss books effectively banned.
Is that what you are talking about?
Is Dr. Suess banned? No.
Six of Dr. Suess's lesser know works are no longer published because of racist
imagery.
Do you find that "leftist"?
A school system in the NE US even admitted as much. A parent attempted to read passages from a book from his elementary school aged kid's school library at a board of education meeting. The board cut him off stating
that "reading pornography" during a meeting was not allowed.
"Pornography" was their word, not the parent's.
Book bans are indeed all the rage in some places today.
Where in the USA are books being outright banned, where you cannot get a copy of said books anywhere anymore?
Do you find that "leftist"?
Leftist generally don't like it when you bring up China being a reason that certain forms of racism are tolerated while other, non-racist things get labeled "racist."
Ah yes, another infamous MAGA hallmark. Never answer a direct
question. If you can't lie, deflect.
"We the people" - of the United States.
This excludes you and that other piece of garbage from Canada as well.
For the non-believers there is always Canada and of course Sweden.
Who are the "we" that you claim to represent?
I speak for myself and not for other people.
We like having businesses and we like having jobs.
I don't see an I here, but I can see two we.
Don't you even understand how different this would look like if you said:
"I like having businesses and I like having jobs."
But no, it sounds much better if you pretend to be speaking for millionss of
other people, doesn't it?
When I mention the 40M US people living under the poverty level, I am the one pretending to be speaking of behalf of those people?
What if I hade mentioned the 41M living in Canada, would that have made me speaking for all the Canadians?
#MAGALogicFails
A school system in the NE US even admitted as much. A parent attempted to read passages from a book from his elementary school aged kid's school library at a board of education meeting. The board cut him off stating that "reading pornography" during a meeting was not allowed.
"Pornography" was their word, not the parent's.
That is not happening in Canada and I would be surprised if it is happening in
the US. If such material slipped through the cracks it can be removed.
If this was pointed out to a librarian it would be removed. Or am I wrong?
Leftist generally don't like it when you bring up China being a reason that certain forms of racism are tolerated while other, non-racist things get labeled "racist."
Bring up China as you need. China is a deeply racist country. China's racism i
a reality, not much to be done about it. I dunno, but I don't think China want
to talk about it, or much of anything at all.
I might just do that. One day."We the people" - of the United States.
This excludes you and that other piece of garbage from Canada as well.
For the non-believers there is always Canada and of course Sweden.
Come to Louisiana. Leave different.
Come to Louisiana. Leave different.I might just do that. One day.
If this was pointed out to a librarian it would be removed. Or am I wrong?
Im past, yes. In the current climate, it would depend on what it was. If
it is a book that depicts (with non-scientific illustrations) two young
boys sexually experimenting on each other, it very well might not be
removed.
If it is a boy and a girl then, yes, it probably will be.
Bring up China as you need. China is a deeply racist country. China's racismi
a reality, not much to be done about it. I dunno, but I don't think Chinawant
to talk about it, or much of anything at all.
I agree with your statements. That said, being as racist as they are, we should not allow them to dictate to us what is racist or not as they obviously don't have a clue.
If this was pointed out to a librarian it would be removed. Or am I wrong?
Im past, yes. In the current climate, it would depend on what it was. If it is a book that depicts (with non-scientific illustrations) two young boys sexually experimenting on each other, it very well might not be removed.
If it is a boy and a girl then, yes, it probably will be.
I don't think sexual experimentation of any kind is part of school curriculum and has no place in school library. Reporting such material to a librarian should be enough to remove the book from the school library.
I agree with your statements. That said, being as racist as they are, we should not allow them to dictate to us what is racist or not as they obviously don't have a clue.
Agreed. I wouldn't take China's word for anything, or let them dictate anythin
at all.
That's not to say I wouldn't talk to them and hope for better.. but..
well."We the people" - of the United States.
This excludes you and that other piece of garbage from Canada as
Sweden.For the non-believers there is always Canada and of course
Come to Louisiana. Leave different.
I might just do that. One day.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 371 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 175:27:52 |
| Calls: | 7,915 |
| Files: | 12,983 |
| Messages: | 5,797,729 |