Following a recent update the chromium browser is again
not working correctly. The most obvious defect is a persistent
"page unresponsive" window when trying to view YouTube.
Firefox-ESR works fine, so it isn't YouTube's fault.
On 05/06/2023 02:29, bob prohaska wrote:
Following a recent update the chromium browser is again
not working correctly. The most obvious defect is a persistent
"page unresponsive" window when trying to view YouTube.
I don't know if that is related to the problems I've been having with Chromium 113 and the BBC News website on my Bullseye Pi 4s, where all
apart from the first picture on the page isn't displayed, videos aren't displayed too. I removed ublock origin and no-script to eliminate them,
and it still happens with no extensions.
druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
On 05/06/2023 02:29, bob prohaska wrote:
Following a recent update the chromium browser is again
not working correctly. The most obvious defect is a persistent
"page unresponsive" window when trying to view YouTube.
I don't know if that is related to the problems I've been having with
Chromium 113 and the BBC News website on my Bullseye Pi 4s, where all
apart from the first picture on the page isn't displayed, videos aren't
displayed too. I removed ublock origin and no-script to eliminate them,
and it still happens with no extensions.
That's most curious. I'm looking now at https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-56837908
and the display seems just fine. There are lots of images,
all loaded and looking reasonable.
YouTube still won't load.
On 06/06/2023 03:12, bob prohaska wrote:
druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
On 05/06/2023 02:29, bob prohaska wrote:
Following a recent update the chromium browser is again
not working correctly. The most obvious defect is a persistent
"page unresponsive" window when trying to view YouTube.
I don't know if that is related to the problems I've been having with
Chromium 113 and the BBC News website on my Bullseye Pi 4s, where all
apart from the first picture on the page isn't displayed, videos aren't
displayed too. I removed ublock origin and no-script to eliminate them,
and it still happens with no extensions.
That's most curious. I'm looking now at
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-56837908
and the display seems just fine. There are lots of images,
all loaded and looking reasonable.
Try going down to a story page. The BBC loads images in articles on
demand via javascript.
YouTube still won't load.
Must be a different problem as it loads for me and plays videos.
...
Alas, 'tis true. Trouble is not a conserved quantity....
On 2023-06-07, bob prohaska <bp@www.zefox.net> wrote:
...
Alas, 'tis true. Trouble is not a conserved quantity....
Indeed: trouble is usually served up by cons. ;-)
On 07/06/2023 03:35, Robert Riches wrote:
On 2023-06-07, bob prohaska <bp@www.zefox.net> wrote:
...
Alas, 'tis true. Trouble is not a conserved quantity....
Indeed: trouble is usually served up by cons. ;-)
Surely some mistake. Trouble is what the liberal politician seeks out, identifies, and then manages to propose state engendered solutions to,
that manifestly will not fix it, so that it remains a problem, and an
excuse for yet more centralised bureaucracy, state subsidy, and
restriction of personal freedom to fix it better.
The logical progressions of this is full communism, where nothing works,
and the politicians are the problem.
On 07/06/2023 03:35, Robert Riches wrote:
On 2023-06-07, bob prohaska <bp@www.zefox.net> wrote:Surely some mistake. Trouble is what the liberal politician seeks out, identifies, and then manages to propose state engendered solutions to,
...
Alas, 'tis true. Trouble is not a conserved quantity....
Indeed: trouble is usually served up by cons. ;-)
that manifestly will not fix it, so that it remains a problem, and an
excuse for yet more centralised bureaucracy, state subsidy, and
restriction of personal freedom to fix it better.
The logical progressions of this is full communism, where nothing works,
and the politicians are the problem.
On 2023-06-07, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 07/06/2023 03:35, Robert Riches wrote:
On 2023-06-07, bob prohaska <bp@www.zefox.net> wrote:
...
Alas, 'tis true. Trouble is not a conserved quantity....
Indeed: trouble is usually served up by cons. ;-)
Surely some mistake. Trouble is what the liberal politician seeks out,
identifies, and then manages to propose state engendered solutions to,
that manifestly will not fix it, so that it remains a problem, and an
excuse for yet more centralised bureaucracy, state subsidy, and
restriction of personal freedom to fix it better.
The logical progressions of this is full communism, where nothing works,
and the politicians are the problem.
And this is just as true of right-wing extremists. As a wise person
once pointed out to me, they all meet somewhere around on the dark side.
On 2023-06-07, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 07/06/2023 03:35, Robert Riches wrote:
On 2023-06-07, bob prohaska <bp@www.zefox.net> wrote:Surely some mistake. Trouble is what the liberal politician seeks out,
...
Alas, 'tis true. Trouble is not a conserved quantity....
Indeed: trouble is usually served up by cons. ;-)
identifies, and then manages to propose state engendered solutions to,
that manifestly will not fix it, so that it remains a problem, and an
excuse for yet more centralised bureaucracy, state subsidy, and
restriction of personal freedom to fix it better.
The logical progressions of this is full communism, where nothing works,
and the politicians are the problem.
Mr. Philospher, very well said.
I see I wrote unclearly. I should have used the slightly longer
version of the last word. Here's the new-and-improved version:
Indeed: trouble is usually served up by con artists. ;-)
On 07/06/2023 21:41, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On 2023-06-07, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:The 30s era fascists only differed from the communists in the
On 07/06/2023 03:35, Robert Riches wrote:
On 2023-06-07, bob prohaska <bp@www.zefox.net> wrote:
...
Alas, 'tis true. Trouble is not a conserved quantity....
Indeed: trouble is usually served up by cons. ;-)
Surely some mistake. Trouble is what the liberal politician seeks out,
identifies, and then manages to propose state engendered solutions to,
that manifestly will not fix it, so that it remains a problem, and an
excuse for yet more centralised bureaucracy, state subsidy, and
restriction of personal freedom to fix it better.
The logical progressions of this is full communism, where nothing
works,
and the politicians are the problem.
And this is just as true of right-wing extremists. As a wise person
once pointed out to me, they all meet somewhere around on the dark
side.
aspirations of their supporters. The end result was the same. A narrow totalitarian elite.
On 07/06/2023 21:41, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On 2023-06-07, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 07/06/2023 03:35, Robert Riches wrote:
On 2023-06-07, bob prohaska <bp@www.zefox.net> wrote:
...
Alas, 'tis true. Trouble is not a conserved quantity....
Indeed: trouble is usually served up by cons. ;-)
Surely some mistake. Trouble is what the liberal politician seeks out,
identifies, and then manages to propose state engendered solutions to,
that manifestly will not fix it, so that it remains a problem, and an
excuse for yet more centralised bureaucracy, state subsidy, and
restriction of personal freedom to fix it better.
The logical progressions of this is full communism, where nothing works, >>> and the politicians are the problem.
And this is just as true of right-wing extremists. As a wise person
once pointed out to me, they all meet somewhere around on the dark side.
The 30s era fascists only differed from the communists in the
aspirations of their supporters. The end result was the same.
A narrow totalitarian elite.
On 2023-06-08, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 07/06/2023 21:41, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On 2023-06-07, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 07/06/2023 03:35, Robert Riches wrote:
On 2023-06-07, bob prohaska <bp@www.zefox.net> wrote:
...
Alas, 'tis true. Trouble is not a conserved quantity....
Indeed: trouble is usually served up by cons. ;-)
Surely some mistake. Trouble is what the liberal politician seeks
out, identifies, and then manages to propose state engendered
solutions to, that manifestly will not fix it, so that it remains a
problem, and an excuse for yet more centralised bureaucracy, state
subsidy, and restriction of personal freedom to fix it better.
The logical progressions of this is full communism, where nothing
works,
and the politicians are the problem.
And this is just as true of right-wing extremists. As a wise person
once pointed out to me, they all meet somewhere around on the dark
side.
The 30s era fascists only differed from the communists in the
aspirations of their supporters. The end result was the same.
A narrow totalitarian elite.
My point exactly - and it still applies today.
Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist,
fascist, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The
human race divides politically into those who want people to be
controlled and those who have no such desire. The former are
idealists acting from highest motives for the greatest good of the
greatest number. The latter are surly curmudgeons, suspicious and
lacking in altruism. But they are more comfortable neighbors than
the other sort.
-- Robert A. Heinlein: The Notebooks of Lazarus Long
On Thu, 08 Jun 2023 17:43:30 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On 2023-06-08, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 07/06/2023 21:41, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On 2023-06-07, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 07/06/2023 03:35, Robert Riches wrote:
On 2023-06-07, bob prohaska <bp@www.zefox.net> wrote:
...
Alas, 'tis true. Trouble is not a conserved quantity....
Indeed: trouble is usually served up by cons. ;-)
Surely some mistake. Trouble is what the liberal politician seeks
out, identifies, and then manages to propose state engendered
solutions to, that manifestly will not fix it, so that it remains a
problem, and an excuse for yet more centralised bureaucracy, state
subsidy, and restriction of personal freedom to fix it better.
The logical progressions of this is full communism, where nothing
works,
and the politicians are the problem.
And this is just as true of right-wing extremists. As a wise person
once pointed out to me, they all meet somewhere around on the dark
side.
The 30s era fascists only differed from the communists in the
aspirations of their supporters. The end result was the same.
A narrow totalitarian elite.
I was just reading the UK soldiers need food banks to make ends meet...banks-as-inflation-tips-members-of-armed-forces-into-crisis-12900704
https://news.sky.com/story/some-military-personnel-forced-to-use-food-
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 371 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 175:03:14 |
| Calls: | 7,915 |
| Files: | 12,983 |
| Messages: | 5,797,724 |