My main Win PC is offline and uses Win 10. Therefore, occasionally I
have used the WSUS tool to update it. I downloaded the latest
version of the tool today and specified the 1909 update along with frameworks, security, etc. All proceeded well and it looks like
several GB of files were downloaded. I started the update tool from
among the downloaded files. I had the chance to select frameworks
and a couple of other things, but I noticed that the 1909 update was
not listed. Once the updates were complete, I checked Win and still
at 1809. Ideas for the remedy would be welcome and thanks in
advance.
On 10/31/24 4:18 PM, ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ wrote:and it looks like several GB of files were downloaded. I started the update tool from among the downloaded files. I had the chance to select frameworks and a couple of other things, but I noticed that the 1909 update was not listed. Once the
Bill S Dimetto wrote on 10/31/24 1:36 AM:
My main Win PC is offline and uses Win 10. Therefore, occasionally I have used the WSUS tool to update it. I downloaded the latest version of the tool today and specified the 1909 update along with frameworks, security, etc. All proceeded well
version/build.
bill
Is there a reason for updating Win10 from a no longer supported version(1809) to a later no longer supported version(1909)?
Why not just update Win10 to 22H2 the most current release.
Note: When updating an almost 6 yr. old o/s(1809) the updating with 22H2 media(USB, mounted ISO, etc.) is likely to not be a direct update to 22H2 latest released LCU.
- i.e. Pre-requisite and prior minimum LCU, SSU, Windows Update engine, WinRE etc. will be necessary for updating - which usually means additional and necessary KB's will be offered and need to be installed before updating to the latest 22H2
Ok, I was not aware there was such a version. I thought 1909 was the last updated Win 10 version. Can this update be done via the WSUS tool? The PC is offline so not sure if WinRE or the others would work.
Thanks, but looks pretty major. I think I'll do a full back up first just in case things don't turn out well. Also, I wonder if there's any real advantage in upgrading from what I have now, 1809, to the last update?
That PC hardly ever goes online and the software seldom changes on it.
Commercial backups, the backup is likely stored in a single file,
so you "can't lose parts of it" by accident. The commercial ones
also support "verify", which is a way of checking the CRC of
the file at any future time. This checks that nothing got
corrupted while you were shifting it between file shares or whatever.
I once had two backups corrupted by bad machine RAM, and the
Verify warned me something was broken.
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 01:48:34 -0400, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
Commercial backups, the backup is likely stored in a single file,
so you "can't lose parts of it" by accident. The commercial ones
also support "verify", which is a way of checking the CRC of
the file at any future time. This checks that nothing got
corrupted while you were shifting it between file shares or whatever.
I once had two backups corrupted by bad machine RAM, and the
Verify warned me something was broken.
Right alongside the Verify function, I've wondered why they don't provide a Repair function, since it would be so easy to do. The Quickpar usage model comes
to mind, and speaking of Quickpar, anyone can use it to verify (and repair) any
file or set of files. Still, it would be nice if Macrium, for example, just offered a similar functionality as part of the backup dialogue.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 507 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 209:29:45 |
Calls: | 9,969 |
Files: | 13,828 |
Messages: | 6,357,980 |