• Spam

    From Jim the Geordie@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 13 11:22:09 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    --
    Jim the Geordie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Fri Dec 13 13:39:07 2024
    On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:22:09 +0000, Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> wrote:
    Path: news..!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
    From: Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk>
    Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.software.thunderbird
    Subject: Spam
    Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:22:09 +0000
    Organization: To protect and to server
    Message-ID: <vjh5d2$1shv1$1@paganini.bofh.team>
    Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; ...

    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.
    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.
    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' >problem, and is there a way round it?
    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.
    --
    Jim the Geordie

    one of many familiar and very common troll-farm tactics is to re-word
    and re-post ad infinitum; also, deliberate misspellings, incorrigible unwillingness to learn, sockpuppet crowding/flooding, obfuscation etc.
    you see this same ceaseless drivel in every newsgroup... c'est la vie

    On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 12:28:49 +0100, Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> wrote:
    Path: news..!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
    From: Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk>
    Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10
    Subject: Gmail and batch posting? (may be OT)
    Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 12:28:49 +0100
    Organization: To protect and to server
    Message-ID: <vaf4hi$1a0bg$2@paganini.bofh.team>
    Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; ...

    I have a domain and a hosted website with email.
    It is a Wordpress Starter account, so I don't pay a lot.
    I am also the publicity guy for a music group and post a heads-up to
    about 200 members once a month. (in batches of between 50 and 80)
    addresses.
    Recently I have found that my hosts have been blocking my outward mail,
    they say, because the batches may be mistaken for commercial spam.
    I understand what they say, but I don't want to pay 3x as much for a VPS >service which I only really need once a month.
    The question:
    If I get a new Gmail address is there a limit to how many addresses I
    can post to at one time?
    --
    Jim the Geordie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Fri Dec 13 13:38:45 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    I would expect a spam blocker to reject things coming from a Gmail
    address. I think you should send from your own domain - possibly the
    one relating to your music group. And make sure that your domain has
    the necessary SPF and DKIM records visible so that your email will get
    through typical spam blockers. Don't send from an email address that is connected with your internet provider - so not Plusnet or whoever you use.

    I've used mailsend, see:

    <https://sourceforge.net/projects/mailsend.mirror/files/1.19/>

    This allows you to specify a list of recipient addresses and add an
    attachment.

    It's simpler than mailmerge but does require a little bit of familiarity
    with creating and running a batch file.

    This ensures that each message is sent separately, and there's nothing
    to show it comes from a bulk mailing function.


    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Fri Dec 13 14:51:10 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 2024-12-13 12:22, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    Some people tune the mail server to send the posts one at a time, slowly.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Fri Dec 13 15:45:09 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 13.12.24 12:22, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    btinternet.com on blacklists (again)?

    https://mxtoolbox.com



    --
    "Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 13 15:47:20 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 13.12.24 15:45, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 13.12.24 12:22, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known'
    problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    btinternet.com on blacklists (again)?

    https://mxtoolbox.com

    Gmail (Google) is spam by definition ...
    Use a more serious e-mail-address.

    --
    "Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zaidy036@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Fri Dec 13 09:50:39 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 12/13/2024 6:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    all it takes is one or two users of that ISP to mark a message from you
    as spam. maybe someone wants to leave the group and to stop emails marks
    as spam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bulk Emails@21:1/5 to Graham J on Fri Dec 13 16:48:22 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 13/12/2024 13:38, Graham J wrote:


    I would expect a spam blocker to reject things coming from a Gmail
    address.

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The
    letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    Rejection is not something happens. The email is entered in spam folder
    or bulk folder depending on the server. I suspect the customers might
    have configured to reject or delete all spam when arrive. The sender
    can't do anything about this except tp send them as cc but this is also
    a privacy issue.

    You are right to suggest a domain but the OP needs to have a server
    unless the registrar of the domain allows email for certain quota, which
    is unlikely. Running a server is not easy because it still requires
    somebody to allow relaying of the emails. His ISP perhaps or some free
    services such as Brevo (300 emails per day).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zaidy036@21:1/5 to Bulk Emails on Fri Dec 13 12:00:13 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 12/13/2024 11:48 AM, Bulk Emails wrote:
    On 13/12/2024 13:38, Graham J wrote:


    I would expect a spam blocker to reject things coming from a Gmail
    address.

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The
    letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    Rejection is not something happens. The email is entered in spam folder
    or bulk folder depending on the server. I suspect the customers might
    have configured to reject or delete all spam when arrive. The sender
    can't do anything about this except tp send them as cc but this is also
    a privacy issue.

    You are right to suggest a domain but the OP needs to have a server
    unless the registrar of the domain allows email for certain quota, which
    is unlikely. Running a server is not easy because it still requires
    somebody to allow relaying of the emails. His ISP perhaps or some free services such as Brevo (300 emails per day).

    BCC stands for "blind carbon copy" and is a way to send a copy of an
    email to someone without the other recipients knowing

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 13 19:59:57 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:48:22 +0000, Bulk Emails <noreply@brevo.com>
    wrote:

    On 13/12/2024 13:38, Graham J wrote:


    I would expect a spam blocker to reject things coming from a Gmail
    address.

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The
    letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    The letter b is for blind, so that other recipients don't see who
    received the copies.



    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim the Geordie@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Fri Dec 13 18:35:33 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 13/12/2024 17:59, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:48:22 +0000, Bulk Emails <noreply@brevo.com>
    wrote:

    On 13/12/2024 13:38, Graham J wrote:


    I would expect a spam blocker to reject things coming from a Gmail
    address.

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The
    letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    The letter b is for blind, so that other recipients don't see who
    received the copies.



    I was advised that using bcc with one 'normal' address, e.g. my own was
    a work-around, but clearly that did not apply to btinternet addresses

    --
    Jim the Geordie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Fri Dec 13 13:42:59 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> wrote:

    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    You get some control over bulk mailings with the sending e-mail provider
    (your e-mail). You get no control over what constitutes bulk mail at
    the receiving mail server (their e-mail). 50 e-mails going to
    recipients all at the same e-mail provider is definitely bulk mail. In
    fact, a receiving server that sees multiple EXACT e-mails arriving
    without the "Precedence: bulk" header are even more likely to classify
    that repetitive inrush as spam.

    Thunderbird was not designed to be used for bulk mailing. Use an e-mail
    client that is designed for sending bulk mails, and one that lets you
    slice up bulk sends into 20, or less, at a time, and let you separate
    the separate bulk mailings by some interval, so the same receiving mail
    server doesn't see 20 come in, another 20, and another 20 all within a
    minute of each other, but sees 20 come in, another 20 show up after 10
    minutes, and so on. Even then you may hit receiving mail servers that
    see exactly the same e-mail sent multiple times to the same receiving
    server. Mail merge and bulk clients can modify the content of the body
    of the e-mails, like add recipient names, or otherwise change the body
    for each recipient, so you are not sending the exact e-mail multiple
    times to the same receiving server.

    When you send bulk e-mails, you need to use a bulk mailer to avoid
    getting your same-content e-mails detected as spam -- because they are.
    Bulk and spam are often equated to each other.

    I don't do bulk mailings, but have seen clients that are specifically
    designed to do bulk mails. I've never had to mail merge, either, except
    those often still send out en masse as fast as they can send. As I
    recall, there is a mail merge extension for Thunderbird, but once the
    mailing is started then Thunderbird will send out as fast as it can
    which means no pausing between a maximum of concurrent sends.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=free+bulk+mailing+client

    That'll start you on the task of discovering which bulk mailing client
    you might use.

    Besides the receiving server detecting multiple received e-mails all
    have the same content hence classifying all of them as spam (or bulk
    despite a missing "Precedence: bulk" header), any one of your recipients
    can report your e-mail as spam. Many users inappropriately or
    incorrectly classify unwanted e-mail as spam. They don't really know
    what constitutes spam. They report anything they don't want as spam.
    Do you have permission from every recipient for you to send them your
    bulk mailings?

    Since you are sending out bulk mails, how do you update your recipient
    list? Do you have a means for a recipient to report to you they no
    longer want your e-mails? What opt-out scheme do you use? Typically
    one person reporting once your e-mail as spam won't get you blacklisted
    as a spam source, but multiple recipients at the same receiving server,
    or the same recipient reporting multiple times, could get you
    blacklisted. You want to be polite in letting them opt-out. Of course,
    they should've opted in before you ever sent them bulk mail in the first
    place. Just because you want to send them something doesn't mean they
    want to get it. Opting out is like yelling when someone steps on your
    foot versus opting in is asking them to step on your foot. Having to
    opt out is considered rude by the sender while opt is polite. Even
    after opting in, the recipient should have a means to opt out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arthur Conan Doyle@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Fri Dec 13 14:10:43 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> wrote:

    I was advised that using bcc with one 'normal' address, e.g. my own was
    a work-around, but clearly that did not apply to btinternet addresses

    Good practise is to use the senders address as the To address to allow bcc recipients to create a reply to the sender.

    --
    Usenet: The world's first (and best) social network.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arthur Conan Doyle@21:1/5 to Bulk Emails on Fri Dec 13 14:09:36 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    Bulk Emails <noreply@brevo.com> wrote:

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The
    letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    Ahh, no. For the humor impaired the "b" in bcc stands for blind carbon copy. As in recipients of said message can't see who else received it. No legit spam filter would block such messages strictly on the basis of the To address being different than the actual address.

    --
    Usenet: The world's first (and best) social network.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Bulk Emails on Fri Dec 13 13:20:17 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    Bulk Emails <noreply@brevo.com> wrote:

    On 13/12/2024 13:38, Graham J wrote:

    I would expect a spam blocker to reject things coming from a Gmail
    address.

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The
    letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    Oh, you purposedly pretend yourself an idiot to mislead the OP. Or, you
    are truly ignorant of the purpose of that header.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_carbon_copy

    Or you haven't a clue how the e-mail protocols work. All recipients
    listed in a message in the client are aggregated into a list of RCPT-TO commands the client sends to the server. The To, CC, and Bcc headers
    are aggregated into a list of RCPT-TO commands. While the client adds
    the To and Cc headers to the body of the e-mail (sent during the DATA
    command), the server doesn't use those to identify the recipients. The
    Bcc header, although shown in the client, is NEVER added by the client
    in the DATA command that sends the message to the server. For each
    recipient in the aggregated list, the client sends a RCPT-TO command to
    the server. The server knows who are the recipeints by the RCPT-TO
    commands, not by any headers in the body. Just ONE copy of the message
    is sent using the DATA command. The server gets a RCPT-TO command for
    each recipient, and a DATA command for the body of the message. The
    server never gets the Bcc header since the client never included it in
    the DATA command, plus the server doesn't use any of the
    client-specified headers in the body to identify recipients. You could
    specify "joeblow@nowhere.invalid" in the To header, but the server will
    send to "markiemarkie@anywhere.yikes" specified in the RCPT-TO command.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David E. Ross@21:1/5 to Jim the Geordie on Fri Dec 13 21:08:08 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my
    E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening. They
    are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to
    work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an alternative
    E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask them
    to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    --
    David E. Ross
    <http://www.rosde.com/>

    Paris mayor quits X platform, calling it a 'gigantic global sewer'.
    Others characterize X (previously known as Twitter) as the place
    where truth goes to die.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to David E. Ross on Sat Dec 14 08:58:00 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 14.12.24 06:08, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known'
    problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my
    E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening. They
    are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to
    work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an alternative E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask them
    to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    This is maximum inefficieny and contradicts what e-mail should perform.

    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Philip Herlihy@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 14 13:21:45 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    In article <vjh5d2$1shv1$1@paganini.bofh.team>, jim@jimXscott.co.uk
    says...

    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' >problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    Mail-Merge in Word is surprisingly easy (certainly the second time!).

    If you have Word, open a blank document.
    On the "Mailings" tab, in the "Start Mail Merge" group, click on the
    "Start Mail Merge" button and select the "Step By Step Mail Merge
    Wizard", which takes you through the steps. You'll need your contacts
    in a table of some sort (or you can select from Outlook contacts).
    Excel's handy for this, thought I tend to use Access.

    Here's a tutorial from a particularly good presenter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XifMrBegS0

    --
    --
    Phil, London

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ottavio Caruso@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 14 15:01:51 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    Le 13/12/2024 à 11:22, Jim the Geordie a écrit :
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.


    You should use dedicated software like mailman.

    https://list.org/

    --
    Ottavio Caruso

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim the Geordie@21:1/5 to Philip Herlihy on Sat Dec 14 14:38:10 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 14/12/2024 13:21, Philip Herlihy wrote:
    In article <vjh5d2$1shv1$1@paganini.bofh.team>, jim@jimXscott.co.uk
    says...

    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known'
    problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    Mail-Merge in Word is surprisingly easy (certainly the second time!).

    If you have Word, open a blank document.
    On the "Mailings" tab, in the "Start Mail Merge" group, click on the
    "Start Mail Merge" button and select the "Step By Step Mail Merge
    Wizard", which takes you through the steps. You'll need your contacts
    in a table of some sort (or you can select from Outlook contacts).
    Excel's handy for this, thought I tend to use Access.

    Here's a tutorial from a particularly good presenter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XifMrBegS0

    Thanks, Philip
    That seems more than I need, but I will keep that link, just in case.
    All I am trying to do is to send a link to our website to lots of people.
    I contacted my provider, who told me that I did not have a DMARC record,
    which they have now added.
    If I understand it, I should now be able to send up to 300 emails an
    hour from my domain address, without a problem.

    --
    Jim the Geordie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Bulk Emails on Sat Dec 14 16:00:32 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 2024-12-13 17:48, Bulk Emails wrote:
    end them as cc but this is also
    a privacy issue.

    It is illegal in the EU.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David E. Ross@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 14 09:15:25 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 12/13/2024 11:58 PM, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 06:08, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc. >>>
    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent >>> to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they >>> were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' >>> problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my
    E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening. They
    are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to
    work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an alternative
    E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask them
    to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    This is maximum inefficieny and contradicts what e-mail should perform.


    Since (1) the Sunset.net tech support is located here in the U.S. and
    (2) the problem occurs quite rarely, I do not find it inefficient.

    I do not understand why this "contradicts what e-mail should perform".

    --
    David E. Ross
    <http://www.rosde.com/>

    Paris mayor quits X platform, calling it a 'gigantic global sewer'.
    Others characterize X (previously known as Twitter) as the place
    where truth goes to die.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to David E. Ross on Sat Dec 14 22:47:22 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 14.12.24 18:15, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 11:58 PM, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 06:08, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month >>>> to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc. >>>>
    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent >>>> to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they >>>> were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since >>>> all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' >>>> problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted >>>> it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my
    E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening. They
    are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to
    work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an alternative
    E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask them
    to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    This is maximum inefficieny and contradicts what e-mail should perform.


    Since (1) the Sunset.net tech support is located here in the U.S. and
    (2) the problem occurs quite rarely, I do not find it inefficient.

    I do not understand why this "contradicts what e-mail should perform".

    Fast and reliable without proprietary crap in the process. Gone since
    Google and Microsoft.


    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 14 17:51:36 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 18:15, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 11:58 PM, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 06:08, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month >>>>> to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them >>>>> down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc. >>>>>
    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent >>>>> to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they >>>>> were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since >>>>> all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' >>>>> problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted >>>>> it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my
    E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening. They >>>> are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to
    work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an alternative >>>> E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask them >>>> to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    This is maximum inefficieny and contradicts what e-mail should perform.


    Since (1) the Sunset.net tech support is located here in the U.S. and
    (2) the problem occurs quite rarely, I do not find it inefficient.

    I do not understand why this "contradicts what e-mail should perform".

    Fast and reliable without proprietary crap in the process. Gone since
    Google and Microsoft.


    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works, sortof.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wasbit@21:1/5 to Hank Rogers on Sun Dec 15 09:39:56 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 14/12/2024 23:51, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 18:15, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 11:58 PM, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 06:08, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a
    month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them >>>>>> down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them
    as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails >>>>>> sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying
    that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but
    since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a
    'known'
    problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have
    cross-posted
    it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my >>>>> E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening.  They >>>>> are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to >>>>> work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an
    alternative
    E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask
    them
    to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    This is maximum inefficieny and contradicts what e-mail should perform. >>>>

    Since (1) the Sunset.net tech support is located here in the U.S. and
    (2) the problem occurs quite rarely, I do not find it inefficient.

    I do not understand why this "contradicts what e-mail should perform".

    Fast and reliable without proprietary crap in the process. Gone since
    Google and Microsoft.


    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works, sortof.

    So where do we get this 'apple's mail' & is it only for Apple devices or
    can anyone use it?



    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to wasbit on Sun Dec 15 11:42:54 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 15.12.24 10:39, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/12/2024 23:51, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    Fast and reliable without proprietary crap in the process. Gone since
    Google and Microsoft.


    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works, sortof.

    So where do we get this 'apple's mail' & is it only for Apple devices or
    can anyone use it?

    Nowhere. It does not exist.

    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 15 17:57:12 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 15.12.24 10:39, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/12/2024 23:51, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    Fast and reliable without proprietary crap in the process. Gone since
    Google and Microsoft.


    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works, sortof. >>
    So where do we get this 'apple's mail' & is it only for Apple devices or
    can anyone use it?

    Nowhere. It does not exist.


    Here it is Jughead:

    https://apps.apple.com/us/app/mail/id1108187098

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to wasbit on Sun Dec 15 17:55:46 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    wasbit wrote:
    On 14/12/2024 23:51, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 18:15, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 11:58 PM, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 06:08, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a >>>>>>> month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them >>>>>>> down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them >>>>>>> as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the
    emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying
    that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but >>>>>>> since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a
    'known'
    problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have
    cross-posted
    it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my >>>>>> E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening.Â
    They
    are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to >>>>>> work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an
    alternative
    E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask >>>>>> them
    to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    This is maximum inefficieny and contradicts what e-mail should
    perform.


    Since (1) the Sunset.net tech support is located here in the U.S. and
    (2) the problem occurs quite rarely, I do not find it inefficient.

    I do not understand why this "contradicts what e-mail should perform".

    Fast and reliable without proprietary crap in the process. Gone since
    Google and Microsoft.


    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works,
    sortof.

    So where do we get this 'apple's mail' & is it only for Apple devices or
    can anyone use it?


    https://apps.apple.com/us/app/mail/id1108187098

    I think it only works on apple products.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to wasbit on Mon Dec 16 09:37:08 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 09:39:56 +0000, wasbit <wasbit@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 14/12/2024 23:51, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works, sortof.

    So where do we get this 'apple's mail' & is it only for Apple devices or
    can anyone use it?

    There's also Pegasus mail, which I use.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wasbit@21:1/5 to Hank Rogers on Mon Dec 16 09:23:28 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    On 15/12/2024 23:55, Hank Rogers wrote:
    wasbit wrote:
    snip <

    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works,
    sortof.

    So where do we get this 'apple's mail' & is it only for Apple devices
    or can anyone use it?


    https://apps.apple.com/us/app/mail/id1108187098

    I think it only works on apple products.


    Thanks



    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Tue Jan 21 14:01:31 2025
    On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:42:59 -0600, VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote:

    When you send bulk e-mails, you need to use a bulk mailer to avoid
    getting your same-content e-mails detected as spam -- because they are.
    Bulk and spam are often equated to each other.

    As stated in my previous posting, this is something I do 4 or 5 times
    a year and while I haven't had any trouble either with Thunderbird or
    my ISP (at least after their tech support person suggested doing it
    the way I do now) I would be interested in know about an alternate
    program.

    I >don't< to this constantly (or my ISP would legitimately be going
    postal on me) but do do these 4-5 times a year mostly to announce our
    online business meetings.

    If there's a more foolproof method I'm all ears.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to hayesstw@telkomsa.net on Tue Jan 21 13:56:53 2025
    On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:59:57 +0200, Steve Hayes
    <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The >>letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    The letter b is for blind, so that other recipients don't see who
    received the copies.

    I am national secretary of a non profit that requires me to send
    notice of online meetings and while my ISP won't allow me to send
    e-mails to all 70 or so regional chairs has no problem with me sending
    TO the national president and blind cc'ing to the other 69...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anton Shepelev@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 22 01:53:38 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.software.thunderbird

    Jim the Geordie:

    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about
    once a month to about 150 people. I had trouble with
    there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them down to
    groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them
    as Bcc.

    Have you considered using a mailing list instead, with the
    extra benefit of two-way communication? freelists.org is a
    free mailing-list service.

    --
    () ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
    /\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Tue Jan 21 20:01:40 2025
    The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:

    On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:42:59 -0600, VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote:

    When you send bulk e-mails, you need to use a bulk mailer to avoid
    getting your same-content e-mails detected as spam -- because they are. >>Bulk and spam are often equated to each other.

    As stated in my previous posting, ...

    Which was posted 7 days after my reply, and attempts to hijack the
    thread with how you attempt to issue bulk mail.

    ... this is something I do 4 or 5 times
    a year and while I haven't had any trouble either with Thunderbird or
    my ISP (at least after their tech support person suggested doing it
    the way I do now) I would be interested in know about an alternate
    program.

    The OP did not have trouble with sending his umpteen same-content
    messages. His problem was one of the receiving domains rejected his
    messages as spam. A client has no control over how a receiving mail
    server handles what it considers is spam. Sending the same content in a multitude of messages is often considered bulk mail even if the
    "Precedence: bulk" head is missing, especially when the same multitude
    of same-content messages are received in a short time, like within a
    4-hour window.

    I >don't< to this constantly (or my ISP would legitimately be going
    postal on me) but do do these 4-5 times a year mostly to announce our
    online business meetings.

    If there's a more foolproof method I'm all ears.

    Mailmerge doesn't throttle the send of the messages. While you can
    specify how many recipients to specify per send, that will send to all
    those recipients at the same time. One DATA command is used by the
    sending client that specifies the content of the message, and multiple
    RCPT-TO commands are issued by the client (one RCPT-TO per recipient
    regardless of which headers specify the recipients). The sending mail
    server gets 1 copy of the message, and a list of recipients to send a
    copy of the message. This has no volume control: send all copies at
    once to all recipients. Slicing up the recipients into groups of
    separate sends will lower the likelihood of hitting some threshold of
    spam filtering based on the number of concurrent same-content messages
    hitting a receiving mail server in a very short interval, but a
    receiving mail server could trigger on just a dozen same-content
    messages received in a hour. With mail merge, you would have to slice
    up the recipients into small groups, like 20 per group, do a mail merge
    on one group, wait an hour, and mail merge to the next 20 recipients,
    and repeat at 1-hour intervals trying to avoid hitting an anti-spam
    threshold where you have many recipients at the same domain. You may
    also have sending limits, too, at your sending mail server; however, in
    this case, the OP noted he could send, but got nailed by an anti-spam
    threshold at just one domain (btinternet).

    What you want is something that alters the content of each message, as
    would mail merge; however, bulk mail detection can recognize when most
    of the content is the same, and just names or minor details differ
    between them. Fuzzy logic gets used to detect very similar messages are
    a bulk mail send. For example, some e-mail services will use their own
    bulk mail detection, or also incorporate scheme that monitors bulk mail
    sent to multiple recipients at different domain (the recipients can vote
    on a bulk mail as spam, a hash is sent to the monitoring server, and
    thereafter the other clients using the same anti-spam scheme will see
    the same-content message as bulk mail). There are several collaborative anti-spam schemes. The one I know about is DCC (Distributed Checksum Clearinghous): https://www.dcc-servers.net/dcc/.

    Another factor to consider is the number of NDRs (Non-Delivery Reports)
    aka bouncebacks a bulk mailing will generate. If you don't maintain
    your mailing list to remove non-existing recipients (you have the wrong
    e-mail address, the recipient isn't there anymore, or other delivery
    failure), you can generate a lot of NDRs at the sending mail server. A
    large number of NDRs is typical of spammer who spew out to millions of
    e-mail addresses whether or not those targets are defined at the
    receiving mail servers. This is the sending mail server telling you
    that you are sending to way too many wrong e-mail addresses. However,
    it appears the OP sents lots of similar messages, and some bounced back
    from just btinternet as the receiving mail server. Receiving mail
    servers can also track NDR count. They don't want to waste time from
    spam sources trying to send to tons of non-existing accounts. A failed
    mail session still consumes resources at both sending and receiving mail servers. The OP's description of the NDR is not only vague, but
    completely absent. We get the OP's description of the NDR instead of
    the domain or mail server that sent the NDR, and the exact content of
    the NDR.

    As for a bulk mailer that attempts to get around all the various
    anti-spam schemes, there is no guarantee any will work. After all, no
    matter how you throttle your sending rate, or change a little bit of
    each message trying to create a different hash/checksum for each, they
    can still be seen as a multitude of same-content messages flooding a
    receiving mail server. At best, you can use a bulk mailing client that
    slices the recipient count per send to something like 20, or less, with
    a little change in each message (similar to how mail merge would alter
    some of the content based on variables specified in the template), and
    separate the sends by 5, 10 or 60 minutes depending on how large is the
    list and how long you're willing to spend sending all the messages.
    Mailmerge might be all you need, but that sends all messages slightly
    modified for each all at once, so only works if your total send count is something like under 25 that hit the same receiving mail server. You
    may still get NDRs even with a bulk mailer, so you have to tweak the
    count per send, how much is modified in each message, and the interval
    between sends until you longer get any NDRs.

    You need to monitor any NDRs you get to maintain your mailing list to
    get eliminate the e-mail address that are no longer valid. You might
    think because you know folks, or they are part of some social group to
    which you belong, that they just must want your e-mails. Wrong. First,
    there must be an opt-in process where they choose to enlist in your
    mailing list. Second, there must be an opt-out process to let them
    leave your mailing list. Third, you need to watch for NDRs to trim your mailing list to remove the dead targets, and reduce your NDR count to
    avoid anti-spam filters, or even getting you blacklisted as a spam
    source, especially in DNSBLs (DNS blocklists), like Spamhaus, Spamcop,
    SORBS, etc. Fourth, while mailmerge can limit the number of recipients
    per send, it doesn't spread those sends out across a longer time span to
    avoid hitting volume thresholds from same sender.

    I recall Sue Mosher, and MVP (Most Valuable Professional), had a web
    site (https://www.slipstick.com/) with tips on using Outlook, but I
    think she passed her web site to another owner. There is a section at:

    https://www.slipstick.com/addins/mail-tools/mass-mail-tools-for-outlook/

    on doing mass (bulk) mailing. While it is oriented to using Outlook,
    some of the tools are bulk mailing clients you can use instead.

    While there are mail mailer applications, most either want you to pay
    for an online service (they provide a quota-limited free service tier as
    a lure, but which may suffice for personal needs, like MailChimp,
    sender.net, etc), or to buy their software (since they did have to
    develop it). Trying to find non-flaky and robust mass mailing software
    that is free is dubious.

    Most mail mailers cost money. For example, you can get an add-in to
    Outlook where you can throttle the delay between sends of batches of
    messages, modify each message similar to a mailmerge, but I didn't see
    an option to slicing up a mailing list into smaller batches (to avoid max-recipient anti-spam rules).

    https://www.sperrysoftware.com/Email-Tools/product/send-individually/
    Not free, though ($70).

    Thunderbird has some add-ons for mailmerge, like:

    https://addons.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/addon/mail-merge/

    Looks like it does have options to slice up a mailing list into batches
    to limit the number of recipients per send, and some options on how fast
    to send, but I didn't delve into it much.

    Of course, since you should be maintaining your mailing list, you could
    slice it up into smaller lists, like 25 recipients per list, and you
    decide how long to wait between the smaller batches. You could use Send
    Later to send one batch of 25 at one time, use Send Later for a second
    batch of 25 at a later time, and so on. I would suggest when slicing up
    the mailing list into smaller batches that you try to keep the number of recipients at the same domain down to under a dozen.

    No matter how you attempt to circumvent the anti-spam filters, many
    servers (and users) consider bulk mail as spam e-mail. You need to not
    send so many at a time, and spread out the bulk sends, and preferrably
    modify each e-mail. Still you can hit receiving mail servers that
    consider your e-mails as spam. Users, for example, could flag your
    e-mails as spam to then get you blacklisted rather than opt-out
    (assuming you even have an opt-out mechanism, and you maintain your
    mailing lists). Unsolictited e-mails are often considered as spam.
    Recipients should have opted in, not get unsolicited e-mails from which
    they then have to opt out (but unsubscribe requests to an unknown source
    is not recommended), or create rules to get rid of the unsolicited crap.

    I don't know of a foolproof bulk mailing scheme. Users can flag your unsolicited e-mails as spam to get you blacklisted. Even when slicing
    up a mailing list into sets of reduced recipient count, and sending the
    smaller lists at intervals, and modifying each message, your bulk mails
    can still be treated as spam. You can send just 1 message per day to 1 recipient, and it could get flagged as spam by the user or by the mail
    servers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Sun Feb 16 21:32:08 2025
    On 22/01/2025 8:56 am, The Horny Goat wrote:
    On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:59:57 +0200, Steve Hayes
    <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as
    bcc. The letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!!
    according to spam filters.

    The letter b is for blind, so that other recipients don't see who
    received the copies.

    I am national secretary of a non profit that requires me to send
    notice of online meetings and while my ISP won't allow me to send
    e-mails to all 70 or so regional chairs has no problem with me
    sending TO the national president and blind cc'ing to the other
    69...

    Back in about 2000, I had to send weekly notices to about 15-20 people
    but my (then) ISP blocked any e-mails being sent to 10 or more addresses
    ..... however he did allow me to set up a Mailing List (containing all
    the e-mail addresses) on his server .... so I'd send my e-mail to that
    Mailing List and his server would then send individual e-mails to each
    address on the list.

    Maybe your e-mail provider offers a similar service. ;-)
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Wed Jul 9 11:08:11 2025
    On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 21:32:08 +1100, Daniel70
    <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:

    I am national secretary of a non profit that requires me to send
    notice of online meetings and while my ISP won't allow me to send
    e-mails to all 70 or so regional chairs has no problem with me
    sending TO the national president and blind cc'ing to the other
    69...

    Back in about 2000, I had to send weekly notices to about 15-20 people
    but my (then) ISP blocked any e-mails being sent to 10 or more addresses >..... however he did allow me to set up a Mailing List (containing all
    the e-mail addresses) on his server .... so I'd send my e-mail to that >Mailing List and his server would then send individual e-mails to each >address on the list.

    Maybe your e-mail provider offers a similar service. ;-)

    Could be but given the bcc method works and doesn't get me in trouble
    with my ISP why would I switch? For what it's worth I DO have to
    update my list during the year but since 90% of them serve their full
    term it's one or two at a time vs 60 or 70 once a year

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)