• Searching for files

    From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 18 20:06:00 2025
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless information.

    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and answer
    session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and search for
    it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it wasn't there, it
    was somewhere else.

    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and saved
    it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a simpler way
    to find a file.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sat Jan 18 18:47:28 2025
    On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:06:00 +0200, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote: >Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?
    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.
    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.
    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless >information.
    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and answer
    session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and search for
    it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it wasn't there, it
    was somewhere else.
    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and saved
    it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a simpler way
    to find a file.

    been using agent ransack since xp days . . .

    https://www.mythicsoft.com/agentransack/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sat Jan 18 13:56:34 2025
    On 1/18/2025 1:06 PM, Steve Hayes wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless information.

    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and answer
    session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and search for
    it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it wasn't there, it
    was somewhere else.

    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and saved
    it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a simpler way
    to find a file.


    I like Agent Ransack. Removing Windows Search is one of the first
    things I do on 10/11.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nil@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sat Jan 18 14:01:38 2025
    On 18 Jan 2025, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote in alt.comp.os.windows-10:

    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken
    on long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research,
    and then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into
    a search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with
    useless information.

    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and
    answer session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and
    search for it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it
    wasn't there, it was somewhere else.

    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and
    saved it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a
    simpler way to find a file.

    I use Voidtools Everything search for finding files by file name, which
    is 99% of my searches. It returns results almost instantaneously. It's
    maybe my most-used utility.

    https://www.voidtools.com/

    For the few times I need to find a file by content, I use Agent
    Ransack. Works very well, but searches can take a long time, since it
    has to examine within each file.

    https://www.mythicsoft.com/agentransack/

    I never use Window's built-in search or Copilot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Logies@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 18 19:58:21 2025
    I use Copernic, https://copernic.com/en/, and an old X1 (x1.com)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From knuttle@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sat Jan 18 14:30:04 2025
    On 01/18/2025 1:06 PM, Steve Hayes wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless information.

    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and answer
    session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and search for
    it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it wasn't there, it
    was somewhere else.

    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and saved
    it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a simpler way
    to find a file.


    I don't know about Bing and Copilot, which I never use. I don't know
    what browser you are using. With Firefox, I can designate a folder for
    all downloads so anything I download is in that file.

    With copilot can you desginate a folder to to save all download?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sat Jan 18 13:49:32 2025
    Steve Hayes wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless information.

    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and answer
    session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and search for
    it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it wasn't there, it
    was somewhere else.

    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and saved
    it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a simpler way
    to find a file.


    For me, the search box in windows explorer file manage works fine. But I
    also got rid of copilot, bing and lots of other rubbish that came
    installed with windows.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From R.Wieser@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 18 21:39:46 2025
    Steve,

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name
    into a search box, and it is found.

    If you can stil open a command console (cmd.exe) than you can do a "dir /s/b \{filemask}". It takes a while, but it will search all of the drive (under
    XP the C:\Windows folder is excluded from "search")

    You can add a "/p" to the command to get results one page at a time, or you could redirect the output into a textfile and than open that for easy
    reading.

    Regards,
    Rudy Wieser

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Herbert Kleebauer@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sat Jan 18 21:44:27 2025
    On 18.01.2025 19:06, Steve Hayes wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless information.

    dir /b /s /a-d d:\*.* >list.txt

    Then use an editor to search in list.txt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sat Jan 18 18:00:18 2025
    On Sat, 1/18/2025 1:06 PM, Steve Hayes wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless information.

    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and answer
    session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and search for
    it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it wasn't there, it
    was somewhere else.

    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and saved
    it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a simpler way
    to find a file.



    The built-in "Federated Search" in windows, generates an inverted index including both filenames (which most of the answerers covered), as
    well as the textual content (text searches are harder to get).

    To set it up, requires using the control panel for it.

    Start : Run : control (Pin "control" to taskbar)

    "Indexing Options"

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/g0xFD166/windows-indexing-options.gif

    It can take all day, for the Indexer to index a million files.
    You have to be patient for the index to fill. The inverted index
    is stored as "Windows.edb" (Jet Blue database) or in Win11 is
    stored as "Windows.db" (SQLite3?). These files tend to be around
    4GB in size. Common words are indexed multiple times, so
    the word "the" is listed with a million file references :-)

    As the OS runs, new file creations are recorded in the USN playback journal. The SearchIndexer process "listens" to the good news about files that
    are created or deleted, and it adds the items to the Gatherer list.
    The indexer than makes corrections to the database file as appropriate.
    The Index can be a little slow to update, but within a short time,
    new entries should be available.

    *******

    Finding an authoritative list of search keywords, can be a challenge.
    I don't know if Microsoft has finally fixed this or not. I'm not
    even going to look :-) I'm sick of looking for a reference.

    The files can be searched, from Explorer.exe search box in upper right corner.

    filename:Vacation ext:txt

    filename:"*cation*" # May need fiddling with wild cards in some cases.
    # It is hard to say why some filename searches do not work.

    content:"Top Secret" # On the US Military version, this won't work :-)

    width>0 height>0 # Using known metadata patterns, locate every image file on the machine.
    # Only images, have width and height declarations. The
    # greater than zero specification is to trick it into action.

    filename:foo AND filename:bar OR filename:baz # Be creative, try stuff, see what works :-)

    If you can't find a reference for "Windows Search", then guessing
    is as good as anything.

    Using this one, causes a popup menu to appear, with some silly names
    for the sizes of files. A few of the keywords, have an associated menu.

    size:huge

    That will find all the huge files on the machine.

    But programming the dialog in the picture above, that's going to
    cause a bit of hair loss, and is likely one of the reasons most
    people give up on this tool. And NO, I don't want an AI helping
    me with this, thank you :-) The software deserves to be fixed,
    not smothered with useless AI.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anton Shepelev@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 19 02:10:04 2025
    Steve Hayes:

    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    Use FAR -- File and Archive Manger, instead of Explorer. It is much
    faster and has a more efficient interface, including advanced search
    for files, optionally by text they contain:

    <https://www.farmanager.com/>

    By default, it will use a very large window. To launch in the standard
    80x25 mode, create your own label to far.exe .

    --
    () ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
    /\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul in Houston TX@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sat Jan 18 18:17:43 2025
    Steve Hayes wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless information.

    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and answer
    session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and search for
    it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it wasn't there, it
    was somewhere else.

    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and saved
    it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a simpler way
    to find a file.

    IMO, Win search has never been much good.
    I like "Everything". It does not search inside of files like Ransack
    but in my many years of Everything on multiple comps I have Never needed
    to search inside of a file.
    https://www.voidtools.com/faq/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Nil on Sun Jan 19 00:50:29 2025
    Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> wrote:

    On 18 Jan 2025, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote in alt.comp.os.windows-10:

    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken
    on long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research,
    and then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into
    a search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with
    useless information.

    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and
    answer session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and
    search for it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it
    wasn't there, it was somewhere else.

    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and
    saved it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a
    simpler way to find a file.

    I use Voidtools Everything search for finding files by file name, which
    is 99% of my searches. It returns results almost instantaneously. It's
    maybe my most-used utility.

    https://www.voidtools.com/

    For the few times I need to find a file by content, I use Agent
    Ransack. Works very well, but searches can take a long time, since it
    has to examine within each file.

    https://www.mythicsoft.com/agentransack/

    I never use Window's built-in search or Copilot.

    [Search] Everything can also search within files by using its Search -> Advanced Search menu. That way, you only need 1 tool instead of 2.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sun Jan 19 01:00:09 2025
    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:

    ...
    X-No-Archive: yes
    ...

    Google left Usenet back in Feb 2024, so that header became meaningless
    since Google was the only Usenet provider that honored it. It has
    always been pointless with other NNTP providers, NNTP clients, Usenet
    archive sites, and web-based forums using NNTP-to-HTTP gateways.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wasbit@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sun Jan 19 09:36:52 2025
    On 18/01/2025 18:06, Steve Hayes wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless information.

    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and answer
    session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and search for
    it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it wasn't there, it
    was somewhere else.

    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and saved
    it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a simpler way
    to find a file.


    I save lots of stuff from the internet either as web pages or to a text
    file (or files) using Notepad.
    The trick is to name the (or each) file & select where to save it to.
    Currently there are over 120 files in the saved files folder & a further
    few hundreds in My Documents.
    If I can't remember which file I saved the information in, Agent Ransack
    will find it - eventually but the more you can narrow down the search
    area the quicker it will be. E.G., searching for a word in 250 text
    files takes a couple of seconds.


    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sun Jan 19 11:05:42 2025
    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless information.

    As others have mentioned, I advise to use (voidtools) 'Everything' for searching.

    That said, adding to Paul's comments on the (Windows) 'Indexing
    Options' applet in Control Panel:

    I see that that applet has a 'Troubleshoot search and indexing' link
    at the bottom (and in another place). You might want to try that
    Troubleshooter to see if it can find and fix what seems to be wrong with
    your system.

    [...]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Sun Jan 19 08:43:32 2025
    On Sun, 1/19/2025 6:05 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless
    information.

    As others have mentioned, I advise to use (voidtools) 'Everything' for searching.

    That said, adding to Paul's comments on the (Windows) 'Indexing
    Options' applet in Control Panel:

    I see that that applet has a 'Troubleshoot search and indexing' link
    at the bottom (and in another place). You might want to try that Troubleshooter to see if it can find and fix what seems to be wrong with
    your system.

    [...]


    I just blanked out the partition names.

    One thing that is not working currently, is the scriptable
    search isn't working now, so Microsoft broke something there.
    The search results can be a bit faster if Explorer is not
    creating icons for the items found.

    The green progress bar was replaced with a rotating progress
    indicator on W11, which indicates they "bite around the edges"
    of the source, but don't generally do too much to the core of
    how it works.

    Paul


    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to wasbit on Sun Jan 19 08:29:20 2025
    On 1/19/2025 4:36 AM, wasbit wrote:

    I save lots of stuff from the internet either as web pages or to a text
    file (or files) using Notepad.
    The trick is to name the (or each) file & select where to save it to.

    I do the exact same. I have several locations on my SendTo
    menu. Privacy, Security, Tech, Ideas, and programming code. Those
    items go to VBScripts that copy the file to 2 redundant folders on
    different disks. I have hundreds of saved articles in each category.
    Plain text is SO efficient compared to HTML or even PDF. And I read
    it in my choice of font face/size.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken Blake@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 19 09:43:51 2025
    On 19 Jan 2025 11:05:42 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
    wrote:

    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless
    information.

    As others have mentioned, I advise to use (voidtools) 'Everything' for
    searching.

    Another vote here for Everything. I like it a lot



    That said, adding to Paul's comments on the (Windows) 'Indexing
    Options' applet in Control Panel:

    I see that that applet has a 'Troubleshoot search and indexing' link
    at the bottom (and in another place). You might want to try that >Troubleshooter to see if it can find and fix what seems to be wrong with
    your system.

    [...]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Logies@21:1/5 to wasbit on Sun Jan 19 17:48:30 2025
    On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 09:36:52 +0000, wasbit <wasbit@nowhere.com> wrote:

    I save lots of stuff from the internet either as web pages

    Zotero is a one-click solution for this task and has a full-text
    search engine. I have over 6000 items and about 14 GB of data in my
    Zotero library.

    Regards

    M.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From knuttle@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 19 14:06:48 2025
    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then savedd it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless
    information.
    In Windows 10 you can do basically the same thing that was done in XP,..............

    Open the file manager, look on the right end of the location window.
    ie mine currently says ThisPC> Window(C)................
    There is a box that when all of, or part of a name is enter it will
    search the follder for thattext in then file names.

    My search need are minimal and the native search is adequate for my needs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to knuttle on Sun Jan 19 15:12:34 2025
    On Sun, 1/19/2025 2:06 PM, knuttle wrote:

    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then savedd it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless >>>> information.
    In Windows 10 you can do basically the same thing that was done in XP,..............

    Open the file manager,  look on the right end of the location window.
    ie mine currently says ThisPC> Window(C)................
    There is a box that when all of, or part of a name is enter it will search the follder for thattext in then file names.

    My search need are minimal and the native search is adequate for my needs.

    The Windows Search (as exemplified by the upper-right corner of an Explorer window),
    is context sensitive.

    If you click "This PC", and then conduct a search, it searches the entire PC. In my example picture of setting up the search index, if you enable
    the index to be built for the entire PC (21 partitions in the example),
    then the portion that has been mechanically indexed in advance, returns
    a search result soonest.

    If you click "This PC" indicating a scope of the "entire PC", and
    none of it is indexed, then Explorer trundles through the file system,
    and a green progress bar appears in the address area of Explorer,
    indicating how far it has searched.

    Thus, by not generating an index in advance, it slows the search.

    Now, in your case, you may have clicked "Downloads" or "Documents"
    as your search context, and the file system descent to check
    those, will be faster than a whole PC search. Explorer only has
    a short trundle to do, to evaluate your Downloads folder.

    Originally, the Search Indexer part of the search subsystem, it
    had a tick box indicating "filenames and Contents" or "Only Filenames".
    The "Only Filenames" option *never worked*. The thing always
    processes the internal contents of files, and especially for
    file types with a "provider". Maybe .txt files have a provider,
    so they can be searched globally. If it spots .eml files, it
    can index the text in those. It can do a text extraction of
    the PDFs (or, a commercial tool like Acrobat Reader may be helping,
    but we do know that MSEdge has PDF capabilities. Each file type
    needs a Provider or otherwise, the content will not be
    included in the Index for later. Now that Windows has archive-lib,
    it can "see into" more file types, such as .7z archives. It's
    not limited to .cab and .zip any more.

    If you don't do anything at all to the Search Indexer settings,
    chances are its scope never exceeds the C: drive. And at first.
    it will index only a tiny part of C: related to your account perhaps.

    Later, when files change on disk, whether created, updated, or erased,
    only the known context is tracked for what to do. If it is only
    indexing Downloads for example, then if a file in Documents is
    erased, the indexer doesn't particularly care to do anything,
    as the filter mask puts that area off limits.

    You can edit the Search Indexer values, and have the indexer consider
    more of your disk drive(s). In the example picture I provided, is
    my setup that preserves my older files. Maybe 7TB worth of files
    in 21 partitions. I entered all 21 partitions (their names are
    masked off in the picture and only the first letter of each
    volume name is visible in the picture).

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/g0xFD166/windows-indexing-options.gif

    When I first set this up, it hardly worked properly at all. I
    set it up as a test mainly. Today, after resetting it and having
    it regenerating the database a half a dozen times, it performs
    reasonably well. It can take 3 to 60 seconds for a search
    of the entire machine to complete. Having it set up, means
    it does not matter what context I select, whether it is just
    the Downloads folder, or it is all 21 partitions of "This PC".
    I can have any scope I want, with minimal interference.

    By nominating a working directory (TEMP) and excluding it from
    the index, as files are added to that TEMP folder, the Search Indexer
    ignores those. Thus, the index is always up to date with regard
    to my contribution to the behavior of the machine. If it does
    Windows Update, some files in those kinds of trees, may get
    added or subtracted from the database.

    Hardly anybody uses this, and I use it on my Archive Machine to
    save time.

    I suspect File Locator Pro (the commercial side of Agent Ransack),
    may have an Inverted Index as well, but I haven't tested that,
    and I don't know if anyone here runs File Locator Pro so we can ask.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Herbert Kleebauer on Mon Jan 20 03:38:56 2025
    On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 21:44:27 +0100, Herbert Kleebauer wrote :


    dir /b /s /a-d d:\*.* >list.txt

    Then use an editor to search in list.txt

    I use "salonb" but it's the same strategic approach as Herbert's:
    dir /s/a/l/on/b c:\*.* > salonb_20250119.txt

    What would be nice is a script that runs once a day to archive the list.
    Maybe something like (untested) this?

    @echo off
    REM salonb lists every file found on your drive
    setlocal

    :: Get current date
    for /f "tokens=2-4 delims=/ " %%a in ('date /t') do (
    set year=%%c
    set month=%%b
    set day=%%a
    )

    :: Format date for filename (YYYYMMDD)
    set date_formatted=%year%%month%%day%

    :: Run salonb
    dir /s/a/l/on/b c:\*.* > salonb_%date_formatted%.log
    endlocal

    Then, in gvim, you can search salonb_{date}.log using regular expressions. Maybe folks can improve it to ask what you want it to list & search for?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Mon Jan 20 03:22:05 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.microsoft.windows, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 01:00:09 -0600, VanguardLH wrote :


    ...
    X-No-Archive: yes
    ...

    Google left Usenet back in Feb 2024, so that header became meaningless
    since Google was the only Usenet provider that honored it. It has
    always been pointless with other NNTP providers, NNTP clients, Usenet
    archive sites, and web-based forums using NNTP-to-HTTP gateways.

    I didn't check, but you can check the headers in these Usenet archives.
    <https://tinyurl.com/nova-alt-comp-os-windows-10>

    I created that link for the world to use because I'm purposefully helpful.
    And because everything I do is for the benefit of everyone; not just me.

    For those who are afraid of tinyurl links, that expands to the nova search, which I asked the nova admin to create and which I tested for him when
    Google dropped the web-searchable no-login easily referenced Usenet search.
    <https://www.novabbs.com/computers/search.php?group=alt.comp.os.windows-10>

    Note: I had also created, more than a decade ago, the prior link:
    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-comp-os-windows-10>
    but that no longer works (apparently) due to that web site domain issues.

    These still work, but they don't benefit millions as they're rarely used.
    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-comp-microsoft-windows>
    <https://tinyurl.com/nova-alt-comp-microsoft-windows>

    Everything I do is for everyone to benefit from my kind-hearted efforts.
    E.g., see also: <https://tinyurl.com/nova-alt-comp-os-windows-11>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Mon Jan 20 08:34:49 2025
    On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 00:50:29 -0600, VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote:

    Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> wrote:

    On 18 Jan 2025, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote in
    alt.comp.os.windows-10:

    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken
    on long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research,
    and then saved it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into
    a search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with
    useless information.

    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and
    answer session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and
    search for it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it
    wasn't there, it was somewhere else.

    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and
    saved it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a
    simpler way to find a file.

    I use Voidtools Everything search for finding files by file name, which
    is 99% of my searches. It returns results almost instantaneously. It's
    maybe my most-used utility.

    https://www.voidtools.com/

    For the few times I need to find a file by content, I use Agent
    Ransack. Works very well, but searches can take a long time, since it
    has to examine within each file.

    https://www.mythicsoft.com/agentransack/

    I never use Window's built-in search or Copilot.

    [Search] Everything can also search within files by using its Search -> >Advanced Search menu. That way, you only need 1 tool instead of 2.

    How, when it can't even search for file names and goes straight to
    Bing?


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Mon Jan 20 09:00:31 2025
    On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 01:00:09 -0600, VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote:

    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:

    ...
    X-No-Archive: yes
    ...

    Google left Usenet back in Feb 2024, so that header became meaningless
    since Google was the only Usenet provider that honored it. It has
    always been pointless with other NNTP providers, NNTP clients, Usenet
    archive sites, and web-based forums using NNTP-to-HTTP gateways.

    I was not aware of having set it as that, and had no reason to do so,
    as answers to the question may have benefited other users.



    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to noreply@mixmin.net on Mon Jan 20 08:32:39 2025
    On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 18:47:28 +0000, D <noreply@mixmin.net> wrote:

    On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:06:00 +0200, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote: >>Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?
    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.
    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.
    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless >>information.
    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and answer >>session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and search for
    it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it wasn't there, it
    was somewhere else.
    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and saved
    it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a simpler way
    to find a file.

    been using agent ransack since xp days . . .

    https://www.mythicsoft.com/agentransack/

    Yes, I might have to instal that.

    But when the operating system disables basic operations that it used
    to include, and wastes one's time with stpid bells and whistles, one
    starts looking for pirate versions of the old ones that did work.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 20 08:57:04 2025
    On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 14:06:48 -0500, knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com>
    wrote:


    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then savedd it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless >>>> information.
    In Windows 10 you can do basically the same thing that was done in >XP,..............

    Open the file manager, look on the right end of the location window.
    ie mine currently says ThisPC> Window(C)................
    There is a box that when all of, or part of a name is enter it will
    search the follder for thattext in then file names.

    That's exactly what CoPilot told me, after 10 Questions and answers.

    But if I knew which folder it was in, I wouldn't be searching for the
    file. Win XP and Win 7 search box would give me a list of files with
    similar names. Win 10 doesn't, it just takes me to bloody Bing or
    CoPilot, neither of which can tell me what I want to know.

    So what I want top known is if there is any way I can get the search
    box on Windows 10 to search for files on my disk and not give me theb runaround.

    Thanks to all those who have recommended 3rd-party utilities (they are utilities, not apps) like Agent Ransack and Everything. I suppose I
    may have to use them to work around the reduced functionality of
    Windows 10 and 11.

    Though I managed to open the editor, and save the file to a location I specified, I still don't know where the original file is. I now want
    to delete it from wherever it is.




    My search need are minimal and the native search is adequate for my needs.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@21:1/5 to Marion on Mon Jan 20 09:13:48 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.microsoft.windows, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 03:22:05 -0000 (UTC)
    Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 01:00:09 -0600, VanguardLH wrote :


    ...
    X-No-Archive: yes
    ...

    []
    I didn't check, but you can check the headers in these Usenet archives.
    <https://tinyurl.com/nova-alt-comp-os-windows-10>

    I created that link for the world to use because I'm purposefully helpful. And because everything I do is for the benefit of everyone; not just me.
    []

    Note: I had also created, more than a decade ago, the prior link:
    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-comp-os-windows-10>
    but that no longer works (apparently) due to that web site domain issues.

    []
    Everything I do is for everyone to benefit from my kind-hearted efforts. E.g., see also: <https://tinyurl.com/nova-alt-comp-os-windows-11>

    But you do nym shift a lot, Peter.

    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Mon Jan 20 04:45:20 2025
    On Mon, 1/20/2025 1:32 AM, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 18:47:28 +0000, D <noreply@mixmin.net> wrote:

    On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:06:00 +0200, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?
    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and
    then saved it.
    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.
    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless
    information.
    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and answer
    session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and search for
    it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it wasn't there, it
    was somewhere else.
    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and saved
    it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a simpler way
    to find a file.

    been using agent ransack since xp days . . .

    https://www.mythicsoft.com/agentransack/

    Yes, I might have to instal that.

    But when the operating system disables basic operations that it used
    to include, and wastes one's time with stpid bells and whistles, one
    starts looking for pirate versions of the old ones that did work.

    There are a multitude of search boxes in W10/W11. It's a minefield in fact :-)

    For example:

    In the Start Menu Box at top "Search for Apps"
    In Settings box top left "Find a setting"
    In Installed Apps Box at top "Search Apps"
    File Explorer Box top right "(file search)" <=== Ding! Ding! Ding!
    ...

    Navigate to the part of the file system you wish to search.
    For example, click "Downloads" folder on the left, and then enter

    filename:MyNotes

    If that does not work, try

    filename:*MyNotes*

    and a few more items might show up.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/hvGfhzTF/File-Explorer-Search-W10.gif

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Mon Jan 20 05:37:33 2025
    On Mon, 1/20/2025 1:57 AM, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 14:06:48 -0500, knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com>
    wrote:


    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and >>>>> then savedd it.

    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.

    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a
    search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless >>>>> information.
    In Windows 10 you can do basically the same thing that was done in
    XP,..............

    Open the file manager, look on the right end of the location window.
    ie mine currently says ThisPC> Window(C)................
    There is a box that when all of, or part of a name is enter it will
    search the follder for thattext in then file names.

    That's exactly what CoPilot told me, after 10 Questions and answers.

    But if I knew which folder it was in, I wouldn't be searching for the
    file. Win XP and Win 7 search box would give me a list of files with
    similar names. Win 10 doesn't, it just takes me to bloody Bing or
    CoPilot, neither of which can tell me what I want to know.

    So what I want top known is if there is any way I can get the search
    box on Windows 10 to search for files on my disk and not give me theb runaround.

    Thanks to all those who have recommended 3rd-party utilities (they are utilities, not apps) like Agent Ransack and Everything. I suppose I
    may have to use them to work around the reduced functionality of
    Windows 10 and 11.

    Though I managed to open the editor, and save the file to a location I specified, I still don't know where the original file is. I now want
    to delete it from wherever it is.


    You should have used the File Explorer search box.

    For example, if using the Start : Run box or using the Command Prompt window:

    <prompt> explorer.exe %userprofile%\Downloads

    starts a File Explorer window, and points to your Downloads folder.
    Now, go to the upper right corner and enter your search.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/hvGfhzTF/File-Explorer-Search-W10.gif

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Mon Jan 20 06:16:32 2025
    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:

    VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote:

    Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> wrote:

    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:

    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken
    on long detours by Bing or CoPilot?

    I use Voidtools Everything search for finding files by file name,
    which is 99% of my searches. It returns results almost
    instantaneously. It's maybe my most-used utility.

    For the few times I need to find a file by content, I use Agent
    Ransack.

    [Search] Everything can also search within files by using its Search
    Advanced Search menu.

    How, when it can't even search for file names and goes straight to
    Bing?

    voidtools [Search] Everything does NOT use any online search engine. It performs only local searches. Not sure why you went off on a tangent
    claiming Everything uses some online search engine. Maybe you meant to
    reply to someone else.

    Also, if you know regex (regular expression), you can enable regex to
    allow you to more accurately define the filter on what to search. DOS wildcarding is inaccurate. regex allows far superior filtering, but you
    need to know PCRE (Perl Core Regular Expressions). There are online
    tutorials to learn regex. I didn't sit down studying regex to know it
    all. I just started doing a little bit at a time, wanted to do
    something that I would hunt online to see how to do it, and acquired
    some expertise. However, seems that no matter how much of regex that I
    learn, there is still a TON more that I could learn, but the effort
    would be a diminishing return on little-used expressions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Mon Jan 20 06:31:26 2025
    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:

    X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.652
    X-No-Archive: yes

    X-No-Archive (and X-Yes-Archive) are headers added to your message by
    your NNTP client, not by the server.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-No-Archive

    I don't use Forte Agent. Have only trialed it in the past. Back then,
    I recall asking for help by posting to:

    alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent
    (the newsgroup still exists)

    Perhaps it has settings to define what headers that client will add,
    like a list of user-specified or custom headers, or options that
    enable/disable the presence of some headers when composing new messages.

    https://alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent.modified.narkive.com/nByleEkp/x-no-archive

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent.modified/c/tWUTq-jlMdk
    "5.0.B A14.b) Agent now includes the x-no-archive option, it must be set
    under group | default properties | post by checking the
    observe no archive check box."

    Possibly you're stuck with the ancient Free Agent adding that header as
    the following hints custom headers was not an option back then:

    https://www.loganact.com/agent/agentfaq.html#3-3-3

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Mon Jan 20 08:45:01 2025
    On 1/20/2025 1:32 AM, Steve Hayes wrote:

    been using agent ransack since xp days . . .

    https://www.mythicsoft.com/agentransack/

    Yes, I might have to instal that.

    But when the operating system disables basic operations that it used
    to include, and wastes one's time with stpid bells and whistles, one
    starts looking for pirate versions of the old ones that did work.


    I don't remember a time when Windows search was worth
    trying. Today they're trying to turn it into a shopping helper,
    but I started using Agent Ransack with XP, too. I did it because
    Windows search was undependable and couldn't look inside
    CAB files. CAB files, a Microsoft standard format, contain a
    file list in plain text. It wasn't unusual to install some kind of
    hardware and have Windows tell me it needs xyz.dll, which I
    would then search the install CABs to find. But as I recall, even
    the file search was shit (and came with that annoying puppy
    cartoon).

    I never tried Windows search again. It's one of the first things
    I disable/remove, along with indexing. I don't need a feeble,
    useless tool wasting SSD writes. And Win10 search wastes a
    ridiculous amount of resources, even when it's not doing anything.

    I also came across a clever little ditty to stop that. After removing
    the Search bar, turning off the service, etc, there's still a search
    process taking some 200MB RAM for no reason. If you kill it,
    Background Tasks service starts it up again! If you disable BT then
    things don't go well at all. I ended up with Windows "strobing". I
    had to get into the Registry in between dark cycles to re-enable
    BT and reboot.

    (I got adventurous when I first tried installing
    Win10, figuring that I could afford to mess it up in the interest of
    science because I made disk images and was still in early tweaking
    mode. It was still a long way from being a usable system. So there
    was little to lose if I screwed up. I kind of wish now that I'd got more adventurous. The amount of crap in Win10/11 is amazing. The amount
    of obfuscation is amazing. Just look at the folder path to the
    SearchApp. SystemApps is about 200MB. Does any of it deserve to
    live? That's hard to know. I expect I can do without the
    "PeopleExeprienceHost" and dozens of other things, but I had to
    stop digging sometime.)

    The following, run as a BAT file, kills search, then immediately
    renames the folder. So when BT tries to restart it, it's gone. :)

    taskkill /f /im SearchApp.exe
    timeout /T 1
    move %windir%\SystemApps\Microsoft.Windows.Search_cw5n1h2txyewy %windir%\SystemApps\Microsoft.Windows.Search_cw5n1h2txyewy.old

    (The last bit starting with move is all one line.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Mon Jan 20 13:19:44 2025
    On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 08:32:39 +0200, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote: >On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 18:47:28 +0000, D <noreply@mixmin.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:06:00 +0200, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:
    Is there a way to search for files in Win 10 without being taken on
    long detours by Bing or CoPilot?
    I collected a lot of text from the web intio a dile for research, and >>>then saved it.
    When I wanted to copy it, it wasn't where I expected it to be.
    In Win XP or 7 I can just enter all or part of the file name into a >>>search box, and it is found. But in Win 10, but comes Big with useless >>>information.
    It suggested CoPilot could help, and after a long question and answer >>>session suggested I go to the folder where the file was and search for
    it there, which was exactly where I had started -- it wasn't there, it >>>was somewhere else.
    Eventually I called it up in the program I'd saved it from and saved
    it to a flash drive from there, but surely there must be a simpler way
    to find a file.

    been using agent ransack since xp days . . .

    https://www.mythicsoft.com/agentransack/

    Yes, I might have to instal that.

    But when the operating system disables basic operations that it used
    to include, and wastes one's time with stpid bells and whistles, one
    starts looking for pirate versions of the old ones that did work.

    fortunately for the little guy, there are many freeware programs
    to choose from, some of which are very popular ... agent ransack
    is one of them

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 20 17:50:54 2025
    On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 05:37:33 -0500, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
    wrote:

    That's exactly what CoPilot told me, after 10 Questions and answers.

    But if I knew which folder it was in, I wouldn't be searching for the
    file. Win XP and Win 7 search box would give me a list of files with
    similar names. Win 10 doesn't, it just takes me to bloody Bing or
    CoPilot, neither of which can tell me what I want to know.

    So what I want top known is if there is any way I can get the search
    box on Windows 10 to search for files on my disk and not give me theb
    runaround.

    Thanks to all those who have recommended 3rd-party utilities (they are
    utilities, not apps) like Agent Ransack and Everything. I suppose I
    may have to use them to work around the reduced functionality of
    Windows 10 and 11.

    Though I managed to open the editor, and save the file to a location I
    specified, I still don't know where the original file is. I now want
    to delete it from wherever it is.


    You should have used the File Explorer search box.

    For example, if using the Start : Run box or using the Command Prompt window:

    <prompt> explorer.exe %userprofile%\Downloads

    starts a File Explorer window, and points to your Downloads folder.
    Now, go to the upper right corner and enter your search.


    But what if the file isn't in my Downloads folder?

    What if I want it to search all partitions and subdirectories on my
    hard drive?

    The old Win XP and Win 7 search box would do that.



    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Allan Higdon@21:1/5 to newyana@invalid.nospam on Mon Jan 20 09:29:32 2025
    On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 07:45:01 -0600, Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

    I don't remember a time when Windows search was worth
    trying. Today they're trying to turn it into a shopping helper,
    but I started using Agent Ransack with XP, too. I did it because
    Windows search was undependable and couldn't look inside
    CAB files. CAB files, a Microsoft standard format, contain a
    file list in plain text. It wasn't unusual to install some kind of
    hardware and have Windows tell me it needs xyz.dll, which I
    would then search the install CABs to find. But as I recall, even
    the file search was shit (and came with that annoying puppy
    cartoon).

    I never tried Windows search again. It's one of the first things
    I disable/remove, along with indexing. I don't need a feeble,
    useless tool wasting SSD writes. And Win10 search wastes a
    ridiculous amount of resources, even when it's not doing anything.

    I also came across a clever little ditty to stop that. After removing
    the Search bar, turning off the service, etc, there's still a search
    process taking some 200MB RAM for no reason. If you kill it,
    Background Tasks service starts it up again! If you disable BT then
    things don't go well at all. I ended up with Windows "strobing". I
    had to get into the Registry in between dark cycles to re-enable
    BT and reboot.

    (I got adventurous when I first tried installing
    Win10, figuring that I could afford to mess it up in the interest of
    science because I made disk images and was still in early tweaking
    mode. It was still a long way from being a usable system. So there
    was little to lose if I screwed up. I kind of wish now that I'd got more adventurous. The amount of crap in Win10/11 is amazing. The amount
    of obfuscation is amazing. Just look at the folder path to the
    SearchApp. SystemApps is about 200MB. Does any of it deserve to
    live? That's hard to know. I expect I can do without the "PeopleExeprienceHost" and dozens of other things, but I had to
    stop digging sometime.)

    The following, run as a BAT file, kills search, then immediately
    renames the folder. So when BT tries to restart it, it's gone. :)

    taskkill /f /im SearchApp.exe
    timeout /T 1
    move %windir%\SystemApps\Microsoft.Windows.Search_cw5n1h2txyewy %windir%\SystemApps\Microsoft.Windows.Search_cw5n1h2txyewy.old

    (The last bit starting with move is all one line.)


    I appreciate the BAT file to kill the Search App.

    My problem has been that the Windows Search Service didn't always remain disabled.
    In the past, I had the same problem with the Device Management WAP Push message Routing Service.
    Back then, Paul posted the command to delete that service, so I decided to do the same with the Windows Search Service.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Allan Higdon on Mon Jan 20 13:33:44 2025
    On 1/20/2025 10:29 AM, Allan Higdon wrote:


    My problem has been that the Windows Search Service didn't always remain disabled.
    In the past, I had the same problem with the Device Management WAP Push message Routing Service.
    Back then, Paul posted the command to delete that service, so I decided
    to do the same with the Windows Search Service.

    I think that I must have always had search disabled. I don't
    remember it getting re-enabled, but I did notice that Background
    Tasks Infrastructure would restart it. I'm teempted to just delete
    the folder it's in, but I don't understand the details well enough
    to start weeding systemapps.

    I haven't heard of deleting services, though I suppose maybe
    one could just delete the Registry key? I have noticed an odd
    thing over time. It seems that not all services in the Registry
    show in the complete list in the Services window. And things
    sometimes disappear.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Mon Jan 20 14:09:03 2025
    On Mon, 1/20/2025 10:50 AM, Steve Hayes wrote:


    But what if the file isn't in my Downloads folder?

    What if I want it to search all partitions and subdirectories on my
    hard drive?

    The old Win XP and Win 7 search box would do that.

    The brute force search that File Explorer does, is too slow
    compared to Agent Ransack.

    I have two OSes loaded on the Test Machine, one has the Search Indexer
    properly configured, the other does not. Let's compare their search time.

    filename:*

    Win7 Federated: 27 seconds, 1278597 items returned to File Explorer window

    Win7 Agent Ransack: 53 seconds, 1259155 items returned in agent Ransack window

    Win10 Brute Force: 111 seconds, 507896 items returned to File Explorer window

    In the last search, I'm not sure why it stubbornly refuses to go past 507896. There appears to be more than enough memory available on the machine. As the File explorer
    search progresses (stopped at 507896 but still scanning) the memory consumed
    is still increasing. It is not like there is a memory cap affecting the
    result.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Allan Higdon@21:1/5 to newyana@invalid.nospam on Mon Jan 20 14:01:07 2025
    On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:33:44 -0600, Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

    On 1/20/2025 10:29 AM, Allan Higdon wrote:


    My problem has been that the Windows Search Service didn't always remain
    disabled.
    In the past, I had the same problem with the Device Management WAP Push
    message Routing Service.
    Back then, Paul posted the command to delete that service, so I decided
    to do the same with the Windows Search Service.

    I think that I must have always had search disabled. I don't
    remember it getting re-enabled, but I did notice that Background
    Tasks Infrastructure would restart it. I'm teempted to just delete
    the folder it's in, but I don't understand the details well enough
    to start weeding systemapps.

    I haven't heard of deleting services, though I suppose maybe
    one could just delete the Registry key? I have noticed an odd
    thing over time. It seems that not all services in the Registry
    show in the complete list in the Services window. And things
    sometimes disappear.


    Deleting the Registry key may work just as well. The command I use is "sc delete WSearch".
    I've also noticed that there are more services in the Registry than in the Services window. I don't recall anything disappearing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Allan Higdon on Mon Jan 20 15:45:33 2025
    On Mon, 1/20/2025 10:29 AM, Allan Higdon wrote:
    On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 07:45:01 -0600, Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

        I don't remember a time when Windows search was worth
    trying. Today they're trying to turn it into a shopping helper,
    but I started using Agent Ransack with XP, too. I did it because
    Windows search was undependable and couldn't look inside
    CAB files. CAB files, a Microsoft standard format, contain a
    file list in plain text. It wasn't unusual to install some kind of
    hardware and have Windows tell me it needs xyz.dll, which I
    would then search the install CABs to find. But as I recall, even
    the file search was shit (and came with that annoying puppy
    cartoon).

       I never tried Windows search again. It's one of the first things
    I disable/remove, along with indexing. I don't need a feeble,
    useless tool wasting SSD writes. And Win10 search wastes a
    ridiculous amount of resources, even when it's not doing anything.

       I also came across a clever little ditty to stop that. After removing >> the Search bar, turning off the service, etc, there's still a search
    process taking some 200MB RAM for no reason. If you kill it,
    Background Tasks service starts it up again! If you disable BT then
    things don't go well at all. I ended up with Windows "strobing". I
    had to get into the Registry in between dark cycles to re-enable
    BT and reboot.

       (I got adventurous when I first tried installing
    Win10, figuring that I could afford to mess it up in the interest of
    science because I made disk images and was still in early tweaking
    mode. It was still a long way from being a usable system. So there
    was little to lose if I screwed up. I kind of wish now that I'd got more
    adventurous. The amount of crap in Win10/11 is amazing. The amount
    of obfuscation is amazing. Just look at the folder path to the
    SearchApp. SystemApps is about 200MB. Does any of it deserve to
    live? That's hard to know. I expect I can do without the
    "PeopleExeprienceHost" and dozens of other things, but I had to
    stop digging sometime.)

       The following, run as a BAT file, kills search, then immediately
    renames the folder. So when BT tries to restart it, it's gone. :)

    taskkill /f /im SearchApp.exe
    timeout /T 1
    move %windir%\SystemApps\Microsoft.Windows.Search_cw5n1h2txyewy
    %windir%\SystemApps\Microsoft.Windows.Search_cw5n1h2txyewy.old

    (The last bit starting with move is all one line.)


    I appreciate the BAT file to kill the Search App.

    My problem has been that the Windows Search Service didn't always remain disabled.
    In the past, I had the same problem with the Device Management WAP Push message Routing Service.
    Back then, Paul posted the command to delete that service, so I decided to do the same with the Windows Search Service.

    If you do your file searches within File Explorer, I don't
    see a reason for shopping results to show up.

    Shopping results show up, when you consult all the search boxes
    located elsewhere in the OS. A search box on the Task bar, sounds
    like an excellent place for shopping searches :-)

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nil@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Wed Jan 22 19:57:18 2025
    On 20 Jan 2025, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote in alt.comp.os.windows-10:

    On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 00:50:29 -0600, VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH>
    wrote:

    [Search] Everything can also search within files by using its
    Search -> Advanced Search menu. That way, you only need 1 tool
    instead of 2.

    How, when it can't even search for file names and goes straight to
    Bing?

    It doesn't do that. If Everything takes you to Bing on a search, you've
    got some major system problems.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Nil on Wed Jan 22 23:49:47 2025
    On Wed, 1/22/2025 7:57 PM, Nil wrote:
    On 20 Jan 2025, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote in alt.comp.os.windows-10:

    On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 00:50:29 -0600, VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH>
    wrote:

    [Search] Everything can also search within files by using its
    Search -> Advanced Search menu. That way, you only need 1 tool
    instead of 2.

    How, when it can't even search for file names and goes straight to
    Bing?

    It doesn't do that. If Everything takes you to Bing on a search, you've
    got some major system problems.


    Name: Everything64.exe
    Size: 4,772,872 bytes (4661 KiB)
    SHA256: EAC349E0A4625A95ADAFB4997B2E42E3AF4D78D982395B3E6B199DFC7D5C5096

    Product version: 1.5.0.1339a

    *******

    Administrator Command Prompt

    cd /d %userprofile% # Switch to user home
    cd Downloads # Get our Everything executable in Downloads
    # When Everything64.exe runs, the prompt comes back immediately,
    # but the disk light is jammed on and running.
    # Wait for the disk light to stop, or check Task Manager for activity.

    .\Everything64.exe -create-filelist every_c.txt "C:"

    notepad every_c.txt # Comma separated list of filenames

    No Bing/MSEdge/CoPilot in there :-)

    This is a one line sample of a file entry, with column titles for reference.

    Filename Size Date Modified Date Created Attributes
    -------- ---- ------------- ------------ ----------

    "C:\Users\paul\Downloads\Everything64.exe",4772872,133222580240000000,133231673612469126,8224

    filetime 133222580240000000
    1D94D3B 1B442400
    03/02/2023 14:13:44.000

    filetime 133231673612469126
    1D95580 52808386
    03/13/2023 03:49:21.246

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 21 03:18:56 2025
    On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:57:18 -0500, Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 20 Jan 2025, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote in >alt.comp.os.windows-10:

    On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 00:50:29 -0600, VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH>
    wrote:

    [Search] Everything can also search within files by using its
    Search -> Advanced Search menu. That way, you only need 1 tool
    instead of 2.

    How, when it can't even search for file names and goes straight to
    Bing?

    It doesn't do that. If Everything takes you to Bing on a search, you've
    got some major system problems.

    My need to search for files was that I saved something in an editor
    program (RoughDraft) and didn't know where it had put it, when I
    wanted to copy it to a USB flash drive to put on another computer.

    Eventually found where it had put the file: in c:\system32

    It seems a very strange place to store data files.





    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nil@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Mon Feb 24 13:50:52 2025
    On 20 Feb 2025, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote in alt.comp.os.windows-10:

    My need to search for files was that I saved something in an
    editor program (RoughDraft) and didn't know where it had put it,
    when I wanted to copy it to a USB flash drive to put on another
    computer.

    Eventually found where it had put the file: in c:\system32

    It seems a very strange place to store data files.

    That is very strange. That location is protected by the OS and normally
    will force you to explicitly give administrator permission to save/move/copy/delete files there. User programs shouldn't suggest
    saving files anywhere near there.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Nil on Mon Feb 24 22:01:31 2025
    Nil wrote:
    On 20 Feb 2025, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote in alt.comp.os.windows-10:

    My need to search for files was that I saved something in an
    editor program (RoughDraft) and didn't know where it had put it,
    when I wanted to copy it to a USB flash drive to put on another
    computer.

    Eventually found where it had put the file: in c:\system32

    It seems a very strange place to store data files.

    That is very strange. That location is protected by the OS and normally
    will force you to explicitly give administrator permission to save/move/copy/delete files there. User programs shouldn't suggest
    saving files anywhere near there.



    The problem is really the way that programs are designed. Typically
    they have file open, file save, file save as, file close, file quit,
    etc. and each program then has its own GUI for locating the place where
    the file should be saved.

    But every OS has a file manager, and clearly this is the best tool with
    which to navigate the file system.

    So programs should save all that effort and call the file manager,
    rather than doing (often badly) the file management for themselves.



    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Graham J on Mon Feb 24 18:34:20 2025
    On Mon, 2/24/2025 5:01 PM, Graham J wrote:
    Nil wrote:
    On 20 Feb 2025, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote in
    alt.comp.os.windows-10:

    My need to search for files was that I saved something in an
    editor program (RoughDraft) and didn't know where it had put it,
    when I wanted to copy it to a USB flash drive to put on another
    computer.

    Eventually found where it had put the file: in c:\system32

    It seems a very strange place to store data files.

    That is very strange. That location is protected by the OS and normally
    will force you to explicitly give administrator permission to
    save/move/copy/delete files there. User programs shouldn't suggest
    saving files anywhere near there.



    The problem is really the way that programs are designed.  Typically they have file open, file save, file save as, file close, file quit, etc. and each program then has its own GUI for locating the place where the file should be saved.

    But every OS has a file manager, and clearly this is the best tool with which to navigate the file system.

    So programs should save all that effort and call the file manager, rather than doing (often badly) the file management for themselves.


    Using System32 might happen when a program is run as Administrator.

    For example, if the launch methodology involves cmd.exe and
    being launched as Administrator, the working directory could be C:\Windows\System32 in that case. It varies with OS and situation
    as to how some of the shell launches handle this now.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 25 05:39:20 2025
    On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:34:20 -0500, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
    wrote:

    Using System32 might happen when a program is run as Administrator.

    For example, if the launch methodology involves cmd.exe and
    being launched as Administrator, the working directory could be >C:\Windows\System32 in that case. It varies with OS and situation
    as to how some of the shell launches handle this now.

    I managed to find the files, using the program that had created them,
    and used "Save As" to save them in a more accessible location, which
    the program seems to have now memorised as a default location to save
    files.

    But it probably explains why I couldn't find them while searching, or
    looking with a file management program

    .
    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GlowingBlueMist@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Tue Feb 25 17:16:56 2025
    On 2/24/2025 9:39 PM, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:34:20 -0500, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
    wrote:

    Using System32 might happen when a program is run as Administrator.

    For example, if the launch methodology involves cmd.exe and
    being launched as Administrator, the working directory could be
    C:\Windows\System32 in that case. It varies with OS and situation
    as to how some of the shell launches handle this now.

    I managed to find the files, using the program that had created them,
    and used "Save As" to save them in a more accessible location, which
    the program seems to have now memorised as a default location to save
    files.

    But it probably explains why I couldn't find them while searching, or
    looking with a file management program

    .
    The "lost files" problem, usually from my not paying attention while
    saving file, is why I installed the Everything program which is free and
    is found at https://www.voidtools.com/

    As long as I remember even part of the filename it finds it even when
    the Microsoft search methods fail.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 25 22:39:07 2025
    On Tue, 2/25/2025 1:49 PM, ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ wrote:
    Paul wrote on 2/24/2025 4:34 PM:
    On Mon, 2/24/2025 5:01 PM, Graham J wrote:
    Nil wrote:
    On 20 Feb 2025, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote in
    alt.comp.os.windows-10:

    My need to search for files was that I saved something in an
    editor program (RoughDraft) and didn't know where it had put it,
    when I wanted to copy it to a USB flash drive to put on another
    computer.

    Eventually found where it had put the file: in c:\system32

    It seems a very strange place to store data files.

    That is very strange. That location is protected by the OS and normally >>>> will force you to explicitly give administrator permission to
    save/move/copy/delete files there. User programs shouldn't suggest
    saving files anywhere near there.



    The problem is really the way that programs are designed.  Typically they have file open, file save, file save as, file close, file quit, etc. and each program then has its own GUI for locating the place where the file should be saved.

    But every OS has a file manager, and clearly this is the best tool with which to navigate the file system.

    So programs should save all that effort and call the file manager, rather than doing (often badly) the file management for themselves.


    Using System32 might happen when a program is run as Administrator.

    For example, if the launch methodology involves cmd.exe and
    being launched as Administrator, the working directory could be
    C:\Windows\System32 in that case. It varies with OS and situation
    as to how some of the shell launches handle this now.

        Paul

    MIght be reasonable to consider the age of the program when also speculating on the default or possible related Windows programs/utilities used when launching or saving.

    RoughDraft's last/latest version was in April 2005(approxh 20 yrs ago, XP era -initial release was in 2001, Widows ME era).
    Doubtful its medieval era installer was looking for ProgramData or maybe even configuration of a default save folder in a userprofile or or configuration of environment variables.


    You would hope it would be fixated on the Documents folder.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 26 06:02:03 2025
    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 11:49:22 -0700, ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:

    Paul wrote on 2/24/2025 4:34 PM:
    Using System32 might happen when a program is run as Administrator.

    For example, if the launch methodology involves cmd.exe and
    being launched as Administrator, the working directory could be
    C:\Windows\System32 in that case. It varies with OS and situation
    as to how some of the shell launches handle this now.

    Paul

    MIght be reasonable to consider the age of the program when also
    speculating on the default or possible related Windows programs/utilities >used when launching or saving.

    RoughDraft's last/latest version was in April 2005(approxh 20 yrs ago, XP
    era -initial release was in 2001, Widows ME era).
    Doubtful its medieval era installer was looking for ProgramData or
    maybe even configuration of a default save folder in a userprofile or or >configuration of environment variables.

    What is the best way to set paths and environment variables in Win 10?



    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Wed Feb 26 00:32:25 2025
    On Tue, 2/25/2025 11:02 PM, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 11:49:22 -0700, ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:

    Paul wrote on 2/24/2025 4:34 PM:
    Using System32 might happen when a program is run as Administrator.

    For example, if the launch methodology involves cmd.exe and
    being launched as Administrator, the working directory could be
    C:\Windows\System32 in that case. It varies with OS and situation
    as to how some of the shell launches handle this now.

    Paul

    MIght be reasonable to consider the age of the program when also
    speculating on the default or possible related Windows programs/utilities
    used when launching or saving.

    RoughDraft's last/latest version was in April 2005(approxh 20 yrs ago, XP
    era -initial release was in 2001, Widows ME era).
    Doubtful its medieval era installer was looking for ProgramData or
    maybe even configuration of a default save folder in a userprofile or or
    configuration of environment variables.

    What is the best way to set paths and environment variables in Win 10?

    start : Run : sysdm.cpl

    Advanced Tab : Down at the bottom use Environment Variables button

    The "Environment Variables" pane opens.

    Double-clicking a line in the lower pane, such as "Path", brings up
    a dialog for entering multi-string. Click "OK" when your edits are done.

    Doing it this way, saves the changes for the next session.

    *******

    Making environment changes from the command line, is of limited duration,
    and is unlikely to be inherited, without a lot of care.

    set

    Using the "set" command, should dump the env for you.

    Paul


    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to zapbot@truely.invalid on Wed Feb 26 10:30:29 2025
    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:16:56 -0600, GlowingBlueMist
    <zapbot@truely.invalid> wrote:

    On 2/24/2025 9:39 PM, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:34:20 -0500, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
    wrote:

    Using System32 might happen when a program is run as Administrator.

    For example, if the launch methodology involves cmd.exe and
    being launched as Administrator, the working directory could be
    C:\Windows\System32 in that case. It varies with OS and situation
    as to how some of the shell launches handle this now.

    I managed to find the files, using the program that had created them,
    and used "Save As" to save them in a more accessible location, which
    the program seems to have now memorised as a default location to save
    files.

    But it probably explains why I couldn't find them while searching, or
    looking with a file management program

    .
    The "lost files" problem, usually from my not paying attention while
    saving file, is why I installed the Everything program which is free and
    is found at https://www.voidtools.com/

    As long as I remember even part of the filename it finds it even when
    the Microsoft search methods fail.

    And this looks as though it might also be helpful:

    How to Disable Web Results in Windows Search <https://www.techbout.com/disable-web-results-in-windows-search-44034/>

    If I want to do a web search I'll use a web browser.



    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)