• One to two hours every morning

    From John C.@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 15 05:56:48 2025
    ...dealing with issues and problems in Windows 10. And this is with a
    clean install of the OS. This morning it's the fact that Windows
    Security has blocked several applications and won't allow me to install
    them because they have things like OpenCandy or the Babylon Toolbar,
    things which can easily by bypassed during the program's setup by
    unchecking an option to use either of those bundlewares.

    Microsoft: "We know what's good for you"
    Me: "But I've been installing and using the programs you've blocked for literally DECADES!"
    Microsoft: "We know what's good for you, and to prove it, we've now
    removed the ability to select an "allow" action or any other action in
    fact."



    --
    John C.

    Take back Microsoft from India!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to John C. on Sat Feb 15 11:57:54 2025
    On 2/15/2025 8:56 AM, John C. wrote:
    ...dealing with issues and problems in Windows 10. And this is with a
    clean install of the OS. This morning it's the fact that Windows
    Security has blocked several applications and won't allow me to install
    them because they have things like OpenCandy or the Babylon Toolbar,
    things which can easily by bypassed during the program's setup by
    unchecking an option to use either of those bundlewares.

    Microsoft: "We know what's good for you"
    Me: "But I've been installing and using the programs you've blocked for literally DECADES!"
    Microsoft: "We know what's good for you, and to prove it, we've now
    removed the ability to select an "allow" action or any other action in
    fact."


    All true, but you can work around it. I've been running Win10 for
    a year now and hear barely a peep from the Windows crap. If you
    want to allow it to run then you're asking it to nag you. I turn off
    pretty much anything Microsoft, block updates, turn UAC to its
    lowest setting and then disable LUA (the hidden UAC).

    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System

    dword EnableLUA

    Add the setting if it doesn't exist and set it to 0.

    With all that done, the only complaints I get are the occasional
    Registry setting I can't change or folder I can't delete. Taking
    ownership solves that.

    It's a pain in the neck, but if you put in the effort then it will
    behave. But you can't have it both ways. You can't enable all
    the crap and allow updates, then expect the system to stay clean
    and do what you tell it to. You have to choose.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to John C. on Sat Feb 15 17:24:00 2025
    "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> wrote:

    ...dealing with issues and problems in Windows 10. And this is with a
    clean install of the OS. This morning it's the fact that Windows
    Security has blocked several applications and won't allow me to install
    them because they have things like OpenCandy or the Babylon Toolbar,
    things which can easily by bypassed during the program's setup by
    unchecking an option to use either of those bundlewares.

    While you are vague as to just what is stopping you from installing,
    I'll assume you are talking about Windows Defender. You can override
    those protections. Sometimes when alerting, Defender will let you
    choose to Allow. Else, go into Windows Security, Protection History,
    click the item, and check if there is an Actions button that lets you
    Allow. Or, go into Windows Security -> Manage Settings (for Virus &
    threat protection), and add an exclusion.

    OpenCandy is adware which connects to an ad server to deliver ads to
    you. It is bundled with freeware or shareware but dishonest authors
    that want to acquire revenue subvertly. The easiest way to thwart its
    install is to download the install (had not be a web stub installer, but
    a full install program), disconnect from the Internet (yank the cable,
    disable wifi, turn off the modem, etc), and install the software. When OpenCandy can't phone home, it doesn't install. Although there are LOTS
    of online articles on how to remove it (assuming you weren't proactive
    to thwart it in the first place, or dump that software to get something
    more respectable), like:

    https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/detections/pup-optional-opencandy

    which have you install anti-malware to remove the adware crap, manual
    removal is not difficult.

    Babylon Toolbar is a web browser extension, so easy to remove. You also
    need to reset your web browser's home page since Babylon has it point to
    their search page.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylon_(software)

    While some of this bundled crapware is surreptitiously installed (i.e.,
    without informing the user), much of it is by user choice. If there is
    a custom install where you select what to install, always choose that
    install mode. However, most Windows users are lazy and impatient, and
    click on anything to proceeds through an install as fast as possible
    with as little cognitive effort by the user.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John C.@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Sun Feb 16 06:47:03 2025
    On 25/02/15 03:24 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
    "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> wrote:

    ...dealing with issues and problems in Windows 10. And this is with a
    clean install of the OS. This morning it's the fact that Windows
    Security has blocked several applications and won't allow me to install
    them because they have things like OpenCandy or the Babylon Toolbar,
    things which can easily by bypassed during the program's setup by
    unchecking an option to use either of those bundlewares.

    While you are vague as to just what is stopping you from installing,
    I'll assume you are talking about Windows Defender. You can override
    those protections. Sometimes when alerting, Defender will let you
    choose to Allow. Else, go into Windows Security, Protection History,
    click the item, and check if there is an Actions button that lets you
    Allow. Or, go into Windows Security -> Manage Settings (for Virus &
    threat protection), and add an exclusion.

    OpenCandy is adware which connects to an ad server to deliver ads to
    you. It is bundled with freeware or shareware but dishonest authors
    that want to acquire revenue subvertly. The easiest way to thwart its install is to download the install (had not be a web stub installer, but
    a full install program), disconnect from the Internet (yank the cable, disable wifi, turn off the modem, etc), and install the software. When OpenCandy can't phone home, it doesn't install. Although there are LOTS
    of online articles on how to remove it (assuming you weren't proactive
    to thwart it in the first place, or dump that software to get something
    more respectable), like:

    https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/detections/pup-optional-opencandy

    which have you install anti-malware to remove the adware crap, manual
    removal is not difficult.

    Babylon Toolbar is a web browser extension, so easy to remove. You also
    need to reset your web browser's home page since Babylon has it point to their search page.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylon_(software)

    While some of this bundled crapware is surreptitiously installed (i.e., without informing the user), much of it is by user choice. If there is
    a custom install where you select what to install, always choose that
    install mode. However, most Windows users are lazy and impatient, and
    click on anything to proceeds through an install as fast as possible
    with as little cognitive effort by the user.

    I know all about OpenCandy and the Babylon Toolbar. The problem is that
    two programs I like are:

    Photoscape 3.7 (comes with OpenCandy)

    and:

    Unlocker 1.9.2 (comes with the Babylon Toolbar)

    And OF COURSE I know how to avoid having either of those crappy
    bundlewares from polluting my computer during setup of either program.
    Windows Security has blocked both of those programs. I as able to get
    Unlocker installed before WS blocked it, but not Photoscape. I will be
    offline and temporarily disable WS the next time I try to install it.

    --
    John C.

    Take back Microsoft from India.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Allan Higdon@21:1/5 to John C. on Sun Feb 16 09:10:19 2025
    On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 08:47:03 -0600, John C. <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On 25/02/15 03:24 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
    "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> wrote:

    ...dealing with issues and problems in Windows 10. And this is with a
    clean install of the OS. This morning it's the fact that Windows
    Security has blocked several applications and won't allow me to install
    them because they have things like OpenCandy or the Babylon Toolbar,
    things which can easily by bypassed during the program's setup by
    unchecking an option to use either of those bundlewares.

    While you are vague as to just what is stopping you from installing,
    I'll assume you are talking about Windows Defender. You can override
    those protections. Sometimes when alerting, Defender will let you
    choose to Allow. Else, go into Windows Security, Protection History,
    click the item, and check if there is an Actions button that lets you
    Allow. Or, go into Windows Security -> Manage Settings (for Virus &
    threat protection), and add an exclusion.

    OpenCandy is adware which connects to an ad server to deliver ads to
    you. It is bundled with freeware or shareware but dishonest authors
    that want to acquire revenue subvertly. The easiest way to thwart its
    install is to download the install (had not be a web stub installer, but
    a full install program), disconnect from the Internet (yank the cable,
    disable wifi, turn off the modem, etc), and install the software. When
    OpenCandy can't phone home, it doesn't install. Although there are LOTS
    of online articles on how to remove it (assuming you weren't proactive
    to thwart it in the first place, or dump that software to get something
    more respectable), like:

    https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/detections/pup-optional-opencandy

    which have you install anti-malware to remove the adware crap, manual
    removal is not difficult.

    Babylon Toolbar is a web browser extension, so easy to remove. You also
    need to reset your web browser's home page since Babylon has it point to
    their search page.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylon_(software)

    While some of this bundled crapware is surreptitiously installed (i.e.,
    without informing the user), much of it is by user choice. If there is
    a custom install where you select what to install, always choose that
    install mode. However, most Windows users are lazy and impatient, and
    click on anything to proceeds through an install as fast as possible
    with as little cognitive effort by the user.

    I know all about OpenCandy and the Babylon Toolbar. The problem is that
    two programs I like are:

    Photoscape 3.7 (comes with OpenCandy)

    and:

    Unlocker 1.9.2 (comes with the Babylon Toolbar)


    My version of Unlocker 1.9.2 (Portable) is from MajorGeeks and is not Ad-Supported.
    https://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/unlocker_portable.html


    And OF COURSE I know how to avoid having either of those crappy
    bundlewares from polluting my computer during setup of either program. Windows Security has blocked both of those programs. I as able to get Unlocker installed before WS blocked it, but not Photoscape. I will be offline and temporarily disable WS the next time I try to install it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to John C. on Sun Feb 16 14:07:07 2025
    "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> wrote:

    I know all about OpenCandy and the Babylon Toolbar. The problem is that
    two programs I like are:

    Photoscape 3.7 (comes with OpenCandy)

    and:

    Unlocker 1.9.2 (comes with the Babylon Toolbar)

    And OF COURSE I know how to avoid having either of those crappy
    bundlewares from polluting my computer during setup of either program. Windows Security has blocked both of those programs. I as able to get Unlocker installed before WS blocked it, but not Photoscape. I will be offline and temporarily disable WS the next time I try to install it.

    I've used Unlocker in the past, but gave up on it. Been way too many
    years since I dropped Unlocker to remember why I gave up on it, but
    recall something about it hanging. When I used it back then, OpenCandy
    was not yet bundled with it. Its author might've implemented that
    dastardly trick after I dropped Unlocker. The last update to Unlocker
    was back in 2013.

    There is a portable version of Unlocker that is ad-free (no OpenCandy).
    While it is listed at:

    https://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/unlocker_portable.html

    a portable version is not listed at the author's site of:

    http://www.emptyloop.com/unlocker/#download

    which shows the latest 1.9.2 version was released back in 2013. That
    there is a portable version makes me wonder if someone gleaned the crap
    out of Unlocker, and stuck it inside a PortableApps environ (https://portableapps.com/). That requires running their environ
    manager (PortableApps Platform) to then run the portable-ized app.
    Since the OpenCandy and toolbar were gleaned out of the portable
    version, you could try using that, but then you don't need to install.
    I don't know how a portable-ized app is going to add context menu
    entries into File Explorer, like right-clicking on a file to see
    Unlocker in the context menu. That level of integration requires
    installation (well, a registry edit) that portable apps are not supposed
    to implement. Perhaps you have to run the portable-ized Unlocker app to
    then use it to browse to the file you want to unlock, or delete on a
    reboot (if you can't delete it within Windows).

    The comparison table at his web site is just as old, so what
    alternatives do or do not support compared to Unlocker is outdated.
    Since LockHunter has done everything I asked of it, and replaced how I
    used Unlocker, I have not since been motivated to look into other
    alternatives.

    As a replacement to Unlocker, I moved to LockHunter.

    https://lockhunter.com/

    Even Piriform, at one time for one or two versions, had bundled
    OpenCandy with their CCleaner product. There was a big stink, lots of
    users were recommended to move to alternatives (e.g., Bleachbit), and it
    didn't take too long (a few months) before Piriform amended their bad
    behavior by removing OpenCandy from their installer. However, Piriform
    got acquired by Avast who then implanted their ad campaign code into
    Ccleaner. Every 6 months, or so, CCleaner would popup some campaign to
    sell something from Avast, like the payware version of CCleaner. The
    freeware version has no need for network connections, so I simply added outbound rules in the Windows Firewall to block CCleaner (ccleaner.exe, ccleaner64.exe, ccupdate.exe) from connecting out to Avast's ad server.

    https://www.ghacks.net/2012/08/06/opencandy-explained-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-technology/

    That's dated 2012, so ancient. Notice CCleaner was listed back then.
    Unlocker is also listed, but I'd have to check now to see if it still
    bundled OpenCandy. The article mentions trying the /nocandy command
    line argument, but that only works if whomever wrote the installer
    honored that argument. My recollection is that I downloaded the full
    installer (not a stub installer that connects to the Web), disconnected
    from the network, and ran the installer (with the /nocandy arg) which circumvented getting stuck with OpenCandy. Plus, I always use a custom installed, if offered, and read each install screen. Many times on a
    custom install, many components are listed that I don't recognize, and
    have to research before I continue with the installation to know what it
    all is to know what the hell they're pushing at me. Some might be stuff
    the author thinks is important to the function of their software, but
    perhaps is bloatware as it is not needed in my setup.

    I disconnect from the Internet during an install of anything polluted
    with OpenCandy, because I don't want the install screens polluted with
    ads which can mislead the user to make incorrect decisions. OpenCandy
    is a nuisance mostly during the install. I'd rather just install the
    program than bother with ads during its installation. As I recall, the
    user was always prompted to whether or not to install anything of
    OpenCandy. It wasn't a subvert install; however, possibly you had to
    choose a custom install to see the choice.

    I recall something of OpenCandy getting installed (copied) into the
    %temp% folder; however, if you ever do disk cleanup, wiping the temp
    folder should be part of the cleanup. If it installed elsewhere, should
    be easy to find by looking for folders named OpenCandy, like using
    voidtools' Everything to search. Same for searching the registry.

    For Photoscape, I'd try adding the /nocandy command line arg to see if
    Defender stops detecting Photoscape as having a PUP (Probably Unwanted
    Program) or PUA (Probably Unwanted Application) payload. I see at:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCandy

    Photoscape is listed as OpenCandy infected, and links to:

    https://photoscape.en.lo4d.com/virus-malware-tests

    That was for Photoscape 3.7 tested back in 2014. Apparently that was
    the last version of Photoscape according to:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoScape

    I take it that placing the installer .exe files in a folder, and then
    adding an exclusion in Defender on those .exe files did not work. When Defender detects a PUA (Probably Unwanted Applications, like an
    OpenCandy polluted installer, it doesn't give you choices?

    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/detect-block-potentially-unwanted-apps-microsoft-defender-antivirus#to-disable-pua-protection

    That mentions using Powershell to run a command that disables PUA
    protection in Defender. Not sure that is different than going to
    Settings -> Update & Security -> Windows Security -> App & browser
    control -> Reputation-based protection settings, and disabling
    Potentially unwanted app blocking. Personally, I'd first try adding an exclusion to see if Defender ignores the polluted installer, and the
    program runs without interferrence (or you get a prompt letting you
    allow always), then delete the installers, or shove them into a .zip to
    hide from Defender finding them again. If that didn't work, then you
    might have to disable PUA protection in Defender, but that means never
    knowing when something else unknown or untrusted is foisting crapware on
    your computer.

    This isn't just Windows Defender protecting you against PUAs. Every
    reputable anti-malware product has PUA protection. Some will show
    prompts asking if you want to block, allow once, or allow always, but
    the result is adding an allow-exclusion as does Defender.

    Alternatively, you can install 3rd-party anti-malware to perform scans,
    and have it remove the crap. Just don't elect to run the real-time
    (on-access) scanner while Defender is running its on-access scanner.
    You only want only one on-access AV scanner running at a time no matter
    how many AVs you install to provide overlapped protection. For example,
    you could install MalwareBytes AntiMalware (MBAM) as a second-opinion
    on-demand scanner (you choose to run a scan) to eradicate OpenCandy, if
    it really did get installed (and not just show ads during the
    installation which isn't possible without an Internet connection). Or,
    install a 3rd-party AV that usurps (replaces) Windows Defender if you
    prefer a non-Microsoft solution with different behavior and features.
    Valid AVs must register (in the registry) that they are replacements for Defender, but the major AVs should do that. If you want a simple AV, Bitdefender Free is good, but I found it slightly slowed disk I/O on my
    setup. I had Avast for a long time, but it was too ad-ridden. Avast
    bought AVG, so using AVG means using Avast-ware. If you want some
    comparison on coverage detection rates and false positives on AVs, you
    can look at:

    https://www.av-comparatives.org/consumer/

    At one time, Defender was just an anti-spyware product, so its pest
    coverage was low. Then Microsoft took their Endpoint client to rename
    to Defender, so Defender became an enterprise-grade AV, and its ratings
    went way up. No AV is absolutely perfect either in detection or in
    behavior, and why some folks will install 2, or more, AVs to provide
    overlapped coverage; however, those AVs rated above 98% really won't
    provide much additional detection when overlapped with another 98% AV.
    Plus, you need to decide which *one* AV will have an active on-access
    scanner running, and the other AVs are second-opinion on-demand scanners
    that you manually run.

    If you don't like Windows Defender, there are other good alternatives.

    OpenCandy claimed "OpenCandy is technically not installed on a computer,
    does not collect personally identifiable information and in most cases
    allows the user to choose whether or not to install advertised software recommended by the vendor." Yet they will deposit files in a folder
    named OpenCandy, and users reported entries added to their hosts file
    that pointed to OpenCandy [sub]domains. They claim they don't install anything, yet they do leave behind a presence. OpenCandy was a means
    for authors to monetize their software with ads during the installation,
    but those won't appear without an Internet connection. Of course,
    OpenCandy disclaims any responsibility for the content of the ads, like misleading users into clicking the wrong button in the installer which
    results in installed unwanted and unexpected other-party software.
    Donationware doesn't work, so authors wanted some means to get revenue
    for their efforts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John C.@21:1/5 to Allan Higdon on Sun Feb 16 14:00:04 2025
    On 25/02/16 07:10 AM, Allan Higdon wrote:
    On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 08:47:03 -0600, John C. <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On 25/02/15 03:24 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
    "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> wrote:

    ...dealing with issues and problems in Windows 10. And this is with a
    clean install of the OS. This morning it's the fact that Windows
    Security has blocked several applications and won't allow me to install >>>> them because they have things like OpenCandy or the Babylon Toolbar,
    things which can easily by bypassed during the program's setup by
    unchecking an option to use either of those bundlewares.

    While you are vague as to just what is stopping you from installing,
    I'll assume you are talking about Windows Defender.  You can override
    those protections.  Sometimes when alerting, Defender will let you
    choose to Allow.  Else, go into Windows Security, Protection History,
    click the item, and check if there is an Actions button that lets you
    Allow.  Or, go into Windows Security -> Manage Settings (for Virus &
    threat protection), and add an exclusion.

    OpenCandy is adware which connects to an ad server to deliver ads to
    you.  It is bundled with freeware or shareware but dishonest authors
    that want to acquire revenue subvertly.  The easiest way to thwart its
    install is to download the install (had not be a web stub installer, but >>> a full install program), disconnect from the Internet (yank the cable,
    disable wifi, turn off the modem, etc), and install the software.  When >>> OpenCandy can't phone home, it doesn't install.  Although there are LOTS >>> of online articles on how to remove it (assuming you weren't proactive
    to thwart it in the first place, or dump that software to get something
    more respectable), like:

    https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/detections/pup-optional-opencandy

    which have you install anti-malware to remove the adware crap, manual
    removal is not difficult.

    Babylon Toolbar is a web browser extension, so easy to remove.  You also >>> need to reset your web browser's home page since Babylon has it point to >>> their search page.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylon_(software)

    While some of this bundled crapware is surreptitiously installed (i.e.,
    without informing the user), much of it is by user choice.  If there is >>> a custom install where you select what to install, always choose that
    install mode.  However, most Windows users are lazy and impatient, and
    click on anything to proceeds through an install as fast as possible
    with as little cognitive effort by the user.

    I know all about OpenCandy and the Babylon Toolbar. The problem is that
    two programs I like are:

    Photoscape 3.7 (comes with OpenCandy)

    and:

    Unlocker 1.9.2 (comes with the Babylon Toolbar)


    My version of Unlocker 1.9.2 (Portable) is from MajorGeeks and is not Ad-Supported.
    https://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/unlocker_portable.html


    And OF COURSE I know how to avoid having either of those crappy
    bundlewares from polluting my computer during setup of either program.
    Windows Security has blocked both of those programs. I as able to get
    Unlocker installed before WS blocked it, but not Photoscape. I will be
    offline and temporarily disable WS the next time I try to install it.

    And I like this:

    "Some errors you might get that Unlocker Portable can help with include:

    Cannot delete file: Access is denied.
    There has been a sharing violation.
    The source or destination file may be in use.
    The file is in use by another program or user.
    Make sure the disk is not full or write-protected and that the file is
    not currently in use."

    I have indeed gotten those errors before. I'll give the portable version
    a try.

    Also, just noticed that I was wrong about what toolbar was included with
    the install version. It's not the Babylon toolbar, it's the Delta toolbar.

    Thanks, Allan.

    --
    John C.

    Take back Microsoft from India.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to John C. on Sun Feb 16 18:39:14 2025
    "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> wrote:

    "Some errors you might get that Unlocker Portable can help with include:

    Cannot delete file: Access is denied.
    There has been a sharing violation.
    The source or destination file may be in use.
    The file is in use by another program or user.
    Make sure the disk is not full or write-protected and that the file is
    not currently in use."

    I have indeed gotten those errors before. I'll give the portable
    version a try.

    Sometimes it is File Explorer that still has a handle on the file. You
    go into File Explorer, double-click a file, a handler might open the
    file, you exit the handler, but File Explorer still has a hold on the
    file. I have a shortcut named "Kill & Reload Explorer" in a Taskbar
    toolbar that runs a batch file with the following commands:

    @echo off
    taskkill.exe /im explorer.exe /f
    start explorer.exe
    exit

    It kills (forces) all instances of explorer.exe which is both the
    desktop manager and file manager. The desktop will disappear when
    explorer.exe is killed. Then it starts a new instance of explorer.exe.
    The new instance won't have a handle on the problematic file. If you
    don't want to use the batch script, open a command prompt with admin
    privelges, open Task Manager, kill all explorer.exe instances, navigate
    to the folder or file in the command prompt to use the 'del' command,
    and use Task Manager's File menu to "Run new task" to load explorer.exe
    again at which point the desktop reappears (but the systray may not get
    all icons reloaded).

    I use the kill-Explorer method as an initial check if I can delete the
    file.

    Except for the last condition noted above, Unlocker's action (and those
    by similar tools) is to delete the file on a reboot of Windows. They
    write an entry into the registry that has Windows delete, rename, or
    move the specified file(s) before anything tries to access them. They
    add to the PendingFileRenameOperations registry key that Windows looks
    at during boot. You could edit the registry itself, but easier to let
    the tools do the registry edit. You need to have the tool add the
    registry entry, and then you have to reboot, so Windows will look at the registry entry on boot to perform what action was specified on the
    file(s).

    https://qtechbabble.wordpress.com/2020/06/26/use-pendingfilerenameoperations-registry-key-to-automatically-delete-a-file-on-reboot/

    This feature has been available in Windows so long that I cannot tell
    you when it first appeared. I thought it was available back in Win9x.
    It provided a means to delete files that were inuse, like they had a
    write lock on them by some process wanted to edit them. Installers use
    this trick to replace system or driver files are are inuse when the
    installer was ran.

    You won't find the PendingFileRenameOperations registry key unless it
    was added to perform the rename, move, or delete action on Windows boot.
    After Windows has commited the actions, it should delete this key. For example, normally this registry key is missing, but OneDrive just
    performed an update in the background. It added several files to this
    key to delete its update files, or the replaced files. If the registry
    key doesn't disappear after a reboot, a service is already using the
    file (the pending delete is too late in the boot process), or the
    rename, move, or delete action failed.

    Unlocker and similar tools aren't performing magic to act on locked
    files. They're just using a feature already in Windows. It's easier to
    let the tools manage the registry key than for you to edit the registry
    while knowing what is the syntax for the files in the list. The
    arguments in PendingFileRenameOperations will have a single line to
    specify a file to delete (no destination is specified), or have a second
    line specifying the destination (for a move or rename).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John C.@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Sun Feb 16 16:22:10 2025
    On 25/02/16 12:07 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
    "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> wrote:

    I know all about OpenCandy and the Babylon Toolbar. The problem is that
    two programs I like are:

    Photoscape 3.7 (comes with OpenCandy)

    and:

    Unlocker 1.9.2 (comes with the Babylon Toolbar)

    And OF COURSE I know how to avoid having either of those crappy
    bundlewares from polluting my computer during setup of either program.
    Windows Security has blocked both of those programs. I as able to get
    Unlocker installed before WS blocked it, but not Photoscape. I will be
    offline and temporarily disable WS the next time I try to install it.

    I've used Unlocker in the past, but gave up on it. Been way too many
    years since I dropped Unlocker to remember why I gave up on it, but
    recall something about it hanging. When I used it back then, OpenCandy
    was not yet bundled with it. Its author might've implemented that
    dastardly trick after I dropped Unlocker. The last update to Unlocker
    was back in 2013.

    There is a portable version of Unlocker that is ad-free (no OpenCandy).
    While it is listed at:

    https://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/unlocker_portable.html

    a portable version is not listed at the author's site of:

    http://www.emptyloop.com/unlocker/#download

    which shows the latest 1.9.2 version was released back in 2013. That
    there is a portable version makes me wonder if someone gleaned the crap
    out of Unlocker, and stuck it inside a PortableApps environ (https://portableapps.com/). That requires running their environ
    manager (PortableApps Platform) to then run the portable-ized app.
    Since the OpenCandy and toolbar were gleaned out of the portable
    version, you could try using that, but then you don't need to install.
    I don't know how a portable-ized app is going to add context menu
    entries into File Explorer, like right-clicking on a file to see
    Unlocker in the context menu. That level of integration requires installation (well, a registry edit) that portable apps are not supposed
    to implement. Perhaps you have to run the portable-ized Unlocker app to
    then use it to browse to the file you want to unlock, or delete on a
    reboot (if you can't delete it within Windows).

    Yeah, I wondered about that myself. In fact, that's why I've always gone
    with the installed version.

    The comparison table at his web site is just as old, so what
    alternatives do or do not support compared to Unlocker is outdated.
    Since LockHunter has done everything I asked of it, and replaced how I
    used Unlocker, I have not since been motivated to look into other alternatives.

    As a replacement to Unlocker, I moved to LockHunter.

    https://lockhunter.com/

    LOL. I love that image on their website:

    https://lockhunter.com/assets/screenshots/mainScreenshotFull.png

    "C:\ProgramData\Muhaha\UglyVirus.exe"

    Even Piriform, at one time for one or two versions, had bundled
    OpenCandy with their CCleaner product. There was a big stink, lots of
    users were recommended to move to alternatives (e.g., Bleachbit), and it didn't take too long (a few months) before Piriform amended their bad behavior by removing OpenCandy from their installer. However, Piriform
    got acquired by Avast who then implanted their ad campaign code into Ccleaner. Every 6 months, or so, CCleaner would popup some campaign to
    sell something from Avast, like the payware version of CCleaner.

    Yeah, I remember all that. To get around it, I just stuck with an old
    version of CCleaner for a long time.

    The
    freeware version has no need for network connections, so I simply added outbound rules in the Windows Firewall to block CCleaner (ccleaner.exe, ccleaner64.exe, ccupdate.exe) from connecting out to Avast's ad server.

    https://www.ghacks.net/2012/08/06/opencandy-explained-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-technology/

    That's dated 2012, so ancient. Notice CCleaner was listed back then. Unlocker is also listed, but I'd have to check now to see if it still
    bundled OpenCandy.

    I don't think it's OpenCandy, I think it's the Delta Toolbar.

    The article mentions trying the /nocandy command
    line argument, but that only works if whomever wrote the installer
    honored that argument. My recollection is that I downloaded the full installer (not a stub installer that connects to the Web), disconnected
    from the network, and ran the installer (with the /nocandy arg) which circumvented getting stuck with OpenCandy. Plus, I always use a custom installed, if offered, and read each install screen. Many times on a
    custom install, many components are listed that I don't recognize, and
    have to research before I continue with the installation to know what it
    all is to know what the hell they're pushing at me.

    Same here.

    Some might be stuff
    the author thinks is important to the function of their software, but
    perhaps is bloatware as it is not needed in my setup.

    I hear ya.

    I disconnect from the Internet during an install of anything polluted
    with OpenCandy, because I don't want the install screens polluted with
    ads which can mislead the user to make incorrect decisions. OpenCandy
    is a nuisance mostly during the install. I'd rather just install the
    program than bother with ads during its installation. As I recall, the
    user was always prompted to whether or not to install anything of
    OpenCandy. It wasn't a subvert install; however, possibly you had to
    choose a custom install to see the choice.

    Yep, and that's why I always try to do a custom install of any software
    if possible.

    I recall something of OpenCandy getting installed (copied) into the
    %temp% folder; however, if you ever do disk cleanup, wiping the temp
    folder should be part of the cleanup. If it installed elsewhere, should
    be easy to find by looking for folders named OpenCandy, like using
    voidtools' Everything to search. Same for searching the registry.

    For Photoscape, I'd try adding the /nocandy command line arg to see if Defender stops detecting Photoscape as having a PUP (Probably Unwanted Program) or PUA (Probably Unwanted Application) payload. I see at:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCandy

    Photoscape is listed as OpenCandy infected, and links to:

    https://photoscape.en.lo4d.com/virus-malware-tests

    That was for Photoscape 3.7 tested back in 2014. Apparently that was
    the last version of Photoscape according to:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoScape

    Apparently there's a newer version now available from the Microsoft
    Store called "PhotoScape X":

    http://x.photoscape.org/

    I tried it, but I didn't like the interface at all.

    I take it that placing the installer .exe files in a folder, and then
    adding an exclusion in Defender on those .exe files did not work.

    Due to the settings I am still dealing with (I just did a fresh
    reinstall of W10 Pro and all programs) it got blocked by Windows
    Security before I had a chance to try and install it.

    When Defender detects a PUA (Probably Unwanted Applications, like an OpenCandy polluted installer, it doesn't give you choices?

    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/detect-block-potentially-unwanted-apps-microsoft-defender-antivirus#to-disable-pua-protection

    That mentions using Powershell to run a command that disables PUA
    protection in Defender. Not sure that is different than going to
    Settings -> Update & Security -> Windows Security -> App & browser
    control -> Reputation-based protection settings, and disabling
    Potentially unwanted app blocking. Personally, I'd first try adding an exclusion to see if Defender ignores the polluted installer, and the
    program runs without interferrence (or you get a prompt letting you
    allow always), then delete the installers, or shove them into a .zip to
    hide from Defender finding them again. If that didn't work, then you
    might have to disable PUA protection in Defender, but that means never knowing when something else unknown or untrusted is foisting crapware on
    your computer.

    This isn't just Windows Defender protecting you against PUAs. Every reputable anti-malware product has PUA protection. Some will show
    prompts asking if you want to block, allow once, or allow always, but
    the result is adding an allow-exclusion as does Defender.

    Windows Security/Virus & threat protection/Manage settings (scroll
    down)/Add or remove exclusions

    Alternatively, you can install 3rd-party anti-malware to perform scans,
    and have it remove the crap. Just don't elect to run the real-time (on-access) scanner while Defender is running its on-access scanner.

    I plan to go offline, disable Windows Security (can only do this
    temporarily) and then install the program, being careful not to allow it
    to run OpenCandy.

    You only want only one on-access AV scanner running at a time no matter
    how many AVs you install to provide overlapped protection. For example,
    you could install MalwareBytes AntiMalware (MBAM) as a second-opinion on-demand scanner (you choose to run a scan) to eradicate OpenCandy, if
    it really did get installed (and not just show ads during the
    installation which isn't possible without an Internet connection). Or, install a 3rd-party AV that usurps (replaces) Windows Defender if you
    prefer a non-Microsoft solution with different behavior and features.
    Valid AVs must register (in the registry) that they are replacements for Defender, but the major AVs should do that. If you want a simple AV, Bitdefender Free is good, but I found it slightly slowed disk I/O on my setup. I had Avast for a long time, but it was too ad-ridden. Avast
    bought AVG, so using AVG means using Avast-ware. If you want some
    comparison on coverage detection rates and false positives on AVs, you
    can look at:

    https://www.av-comparatives.org/consumer/

    At one time, Defender was just an anti-spyware product, so its pest
    coverage was low. Then Microsoft took their Endpoint client to rename
    to Defender, so Defender became an enterprise-grade AV, and its ratings
    went way up. No AV is absolutely perfect either in detection or in
    behavior, and why some folks will install 2, or more, AVs to provide overlapped coverage; however, those AVs rated above 98% really won't
    provide much additional detection when overlapped with another 98% AV.
    Plus, you need to decide which *one* AV will have an active on-access
    scanner running, and the other AVs are second-opinion on-demand scanners
    that you manually run.

    If you don't like Windows Defender, there are other good alternatives.

    OpenCandy claimed "OpenCandy is technically not installed on a computer,
    does not collect personally identifiable information and in most cases
    allows the user to choose whether or not to install advertised software recommended by the vendor." Yet they will deposit files in a folder
    named OpenCandy, and users reported entries added to their hosts file
    that pointed to OpenCandy [sub]domains. They claim they don't install anything, yet they do leave behind a presence. OpenCandy was a means
    for authors to monetize their software with ads during the installation,
    but those won't appear without an Internet connection. Of course,
    OpenCandy disclaims any responsibility for the content of the ads, like misleading users into clicking the wrong button in the installer which results in installed unwanted and unexpected other-party software. Donationware doesn't work, so authors wanted some means to get revenue
    for their efforts.

    Yep. I remember it well. However, in the past I installed Photoscape and
    I'm pretty sure I was able to bypass OpenCandy.

    --
    John C.

    Take back Microsoft from India.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John C.@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Mon Feb 17 05:45:50 2025
    VanguardLH wrote:
    John C. wrote:

    "Some errors you might get that Unlocker Portable can help with include:

    Cannot delete file: Access is denied.
    There has been a sharing violation.
    The source or destination file may be in use.
    The file is in use by another program or user.
    Make sure the disk is not full or write-protected and that the file is
    not currently in use."

    I have indeed gotten those errors before. I'll give the portable
    version a try.

    Sometimes it is File Explorer that still has a handle on the file.

    Yes.

    You
    go into File Explorer, double-click a file, a handler might open the
    file, you exit the handler, but File Explorer still has a hold on the
    file. I have a shortcut named "Kill & Reload Explorer" in a Taskbar
    toolbar that runs a batch file with the following commands:

    @echo off
    taskkill.exe /im explorer.exe /f
    start explorer.exe
    exit

    It kills (forces) all instances of explorer.exe which is both the
    desktop manager and file manager. The desktop will disappear when explorer.exe is killed. Then it starts a new instance of explorer.exe.
    The new instance won't have a handle on the problematic file. If you
    don't want to use the batch script, open a command prompt with admin privelges, open Task Manager, kill all explorer.exe instances, navigate
    to the folder or file in the command prompt to use the 'del' command,
    and use Task Manager's File menu to "Run new task" to load explorer.exe
    again at which point the desktop reappears (but the systray may not get
    all icons reloaded).

    I use the kill-Explorer method as an initial check if I can delete the
    file.

    Except for the last condition noted above, Unlocker's action (and those
    by similar tools) is to delete the file on a reboot of Windows. They
    write an entry into the registry that has Windows delete, rename, or
    move the specified file(s) before anything tries to access them. They
    add to the PendingFileRenameOperations registry key that Windows looks
    at during boot. You could edit the registry itself, but easier to let
    the tools do the registry edit. You need to have the tool add the
    registry entry, and then you have to reboot, so Windows will look at the registry entry on boot to perform what action was specified on the
    file(s).

    https://qtechbabble.wordpress.com/2020/06/26/use-pendingfilerenameoperations-registry-key-to-automatically-delete-a-file-on-reboot/

    This feature has been available in Windows so long that I cannot tell
    you when it first appeared. I thought it was available back in Win9x.
    It provided a means to delete files that were inuse, like they had a
    write lock on them by some process wanted to edit them. Installers use
    this trick to replace system or driver files are are inuse when the
    installer was ran.

    You won't find the PendingFileRenameOperations registry key unless it
    was added to perform the rename, move, or delete action on Windows boot. After Windows has commited the actions, it should delete this key. For example, normally this registry key is missing, but OneDrive just
    performed an update in the background. It added several files to this
    key to delete its update files, or the replaced files. If the registry
    key doesn't disappear after a reboot, a service is already using the
    file (the pending delete is too late in the boot process), or the
    rename, move, or delete action failed.

    Unlocker and similar tools aren't performing magic to act on locked
    files. They're just using a feature already in Windows. It's easier to
    let the tools manage the registry key than for you to edit the registry
    while knowing what is the syntax for the files in the list. The
    arguments in PendingFileRenameOperations will have a single line to
    specify a file to delete (no destination is specified), or have a second
    line specifying the destination (for a move or rename).

    Yes, I've used Unlocker to delete files upon reboot many times. It
    almost always gets the job done.

    --
    John C.

    Take back Microsoft from India.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)