• =?UTF-8?B?4oCcS0RFIEZvciBXaW5kb3dzIDEwIEV4aWxlc+KAnQ==?= Campaign

    From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 5 00:41:09 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    “Your computer is toast

    “Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
    turn it into junk.

    “It may seem like it continues to work after that date for a bit, but when Microsoft stops support for Windows 10, your perfectly good computer will
    be officially obsolete.

    “Windows 10 will degrade as more and more bugs come to light. With nobody
    to correct them, you risk being hacked. Your data, identity, and control
    over your device could be stolen.

    “New versions of your apps will not run, but Microsoft will still block
    you from upgrading to the next version of Windows until you buy the new computer they decide.”

    Scary? Yes. Exaggerated? No. Because that’s what Microsoft really wants to do. Just like it has done so many times before.

    <https://kde.org/for/w10-exiles/>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Wed Jun 4 21:17:15 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Wed, 6/4/2025 8:41 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    “Your computer is toast

    “Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
    turn it into junk.

    “It may seem like it continues to work after that date for a bit, but when Microsoft stops support for Windows 10, your perfectly good computer will
    be officially obsolete.

    “Windows 10 will degrade as more and more bugs come to light. With nobody to correct them, you risk being hacked. Your data, identity, and control
    over your device could be stolen.

    “New versions of your apps will not run, but Microsoft will still block
    you from upgrading to the next version of Windows until you buy the new computer they decide.”

    Scary? Yes. Exaggerated? No. Because that’s what Microsoft really wants to do. Just like it has done so many times before.

    <https://kde.org/for/w10-exiles/>


    Was that a picture of one of the KDE staffers computer room ?

    Maybe that's their build server ? :-)

    Seriously, I scanned the page and I don't see an action plan.
    How exactly will the software climb onto the PC ?

    That's what is missing from the Year Of The Linux Desktop,
    is the Concierge service. Remember, your average user is
    not a C.S. graduate, and with the sorry state of Google searches
    these days, even the best-prepared website is never going to show
    up in a search.

    How do I put the ISO on the USB stick ? Some of the people,
    just a few, will remember trying one USB stick tool after another,
    and ending up with nothing to show for their trouble. And those
    are the people who will be offering advice.

    A few of the users, will try to download the ISO onto
    a FAT32 partition for temporary storage. Say, a 6GB Ubuntu DVD.
    And you know what happens when you do that. I've done that
    *several* times by accident. Today, there are no more FAT32 partitions
    in the active computer room. When the WinXP machine died, the interest
    in FAT32 went with it.

    I looked at gstatcounter today, and I saw some strange patterns
    in there. What's weird about the patterns, is there are real world
    events... and the patterns in gstatcounter are delayed by two or
    three months. Nothing seems to "align immediately" exactly. It's
    my suspicion, that Microsoft is winning by playing this game. But
    it's a natural outcome. The path of least resistance is being followed.
    I've already heard one USENETter say the fateful words,
    "maybe I should buy a Win11 machine". Not many would have
    the balls to admit something like that. Normally that sort
    of thing happens silently.

    That's why I'm telling you that Concierge service is the only
    campaign that will work. Unless a loaded USB stick shows up in a mailer
    on each users doorstep, it's not gonna happen.

    Google has an offering for the Chrome Book OS, and the offering is a bit
    more friendly than the competition. Unfortunately, their GUI
    is not very expressive. When the installer boots, it should just
    say "um, we don't install on desktops, hey, try your laptop".
    Instead, the interface just freezes... as a status code. When
    I booted my laptop with that installer USB, I finally made it
    past the first screen. But had no intention of installing it
    on my laptop.

    If it's one thing I know about helping users, it takes *forever*
    to get one of them tipped upright. It's like herding turtles.
    How this is a recipe for the Year Of The Linux Desktop,
    escapes me. The above web page isn't helping.

    If you were serious about your campaign, you'd send 100 serialized
    USB sticks to each Public Library. Then, on the KDE web page,
    when everything is staged, you'd have the users sign out the
    stick at the library, and bring it back later. Or, be charged
    a nominal fee (similar to a late book charge). Libraries do not
    enjoy being dragged into every crazy assed scheme, but they
    were the point of contact here for FreeNet. You could fill
    out a FreeNet sheet, show your drivers license to attest to
    the details, and the sheet was then forwarded to FreeNet.
    There isn't really a FreeNet here any more, but that's how
    they got some people hooked up on an "hour a week" dialup plan.
    The local FreeNet modem front end was donated by a high tech company.

    Pressed DVDs would be cheaper, but the instant response in the
    audience would be "hey, I don't got a DVD drive". That's why
    I can't utter magic words like that.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From vallor@21:1/5 to Paul on Thu Jun 5 02:44:47 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 21:17:15 -0400, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote in <101qr6t$158p2$1@dont-email.me>:

    On Wed, 6/4/2025 8:41 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    “Your computer is toast

    “Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
    turn it into junk.

    “It may seem like it continues to work after that date for a bit, but
    when Microsoft stops support for Windows 10, your perfectly good
    computer will be officially obsolete.

    “Windows 10 will degrade as more and more bugs come to light. With
    nobody to correct them, you risk being hacked. Your data, identity, and
    control over your device could be stolen.

    “New versions of your apps will not run, but Microsoft will still block
    you from upgrading to the next version of Windows until you buy the new
    computer they decide.”

    Scary? Yes. Exaggerated? No. Because that’s what Microsoft really wants
    to do. Just like it has done so many times before.

    <https://kde.org/for/w10-exiles/>


    Was that a picture of one of the KDE staffers computer room ?

    Maybe that's their build server ? :-)

    Seriously, I scanned the page and I don't see an action plan.
    How exactly will the software climb onto the PC ?

    That's what is missing from the Year Of The Linux Desktop,
    is the Concierge service.

    I've written about this before. Someone could start a business along the
    lines of "Geek Squad" that caters to Linux.

    Because when you get down to it, what is the "concierge service" for
    Windows? Seems to be Geek Squad, or any number of local establishments.

    For Linux, one might be lucky and find a local establishment that knows it
    -- or a friendly LUG. I know one elderly lady (who posts as "Bliss") who
    got help from SFLUG. I know another grandma who uses Linux _and_ Usenet,
    who has a daughter who is Linux-savvy.


    Remember, your average user is not a C.S.
    graduate, and with the sorry state of Google searches these days, even
    the best-prepared website is never going to show up in a search.

    You know as well as I do that you don't need to be a "C.S. graduate" to
    use Linux. It's not 2015 anymore. I daresay Linux is easier to install
    and use than Windows.

    "But what about MS Office?" someone may ask: For the most part,
    Office 365 works on Linux. (Alas, Access doesn't. That's the only
    reason I haven't moved my parents to Linux.)

    How do I put the ISO on the USB stick ?

    Beats me. How do you do it for Windows?

    Some of the people,
    just a few, will remember trying one USB stick tool after another,
    and ending up with nothing to show for their trouble. And those are the people who will be offering advice.

    A few of the users, will try to download the ISO onto a FAT32 partition
    for temporary storage. Say, a 6GB Ubuntu DVD.
    And you know what happens when you do that. I've done that *several*
    times by accident. Today, there are no more FAT32 partitions in the
    active computer room. When the WinXP machine died, the interest in FAT32
    went with it.

    I looked at gstatcounter today, and I saw some strange patterns in
    there. What's weird about the patterns, is there are real world
    events... and the patterns in gstatcounter are delayed by two or three months. Nothing seems to "align immediately" exactly. It's my suspicion,
    that Microsoft is winning by playing this game. But it's a natural
    outcome. The path of least resistance is being followed. I've already
    heard one USENETter say the fateful words,
    "maybe I should buy a Win11 machine". Not many would have the balls to
    admit something like that. Normally that sort of thing happens silently.

    That's why I'm telling you that Concierge service is the only campaign
    that will work. Unless a loaded USB stick shows up in a mailer on each
    users doorstep, it's not gonna happen.

    Google has an offering for the Chrome Book OS, and the offering is a bit
    more friendly than the competition. Unfortunately, their GUI is not very expressive. When the installer boots, it should just say "um, we don't install on desktops, hey, try your laptop".
    Instead, the interface just freezes... as a status code. When I booted
    my laptop with that installer USB, I finally made it past the first
    screen. But had no intention of installing it on my laptop.

    If it's one thing I know about helping users, it takes *forever*
    to get one of them tipped upright. It's like herding turtles.
    How this is a recipe for the Year Of The Linux Desktop,
    escapes me. The above web page isn't helping.

    If you were serious about your campaign, you'd send 100 serialized USB
    sticks to each Public Library. Then, on the KDE web page,
    when everything is staged, you'd have the users sign out the stick at
    the library, and bring it back later. Or, be charged a nominal fee
    (similar to a late book charge). Libraries do not enjoy being dragged
    into every crazy assed scheme, but they were the point of contact here
    for FreeNet. You could fill out a FreeNet sheet, show your drivers
    license to attest to the details, and the sheet was then forwarded to FreeNet.
    There isn't really a FreeNet here any more, but that's how they got some people hooked up on an "hour a week" dialup plan.
    The local FreeNet modem front end was donated by a high tech company.

    Pressed DVDs would be cheaper, but the instant response in the audience
    would be "hey, I don't got a DVD drive". That's why I can't utter magic
    words like that.

    Thanks for the history lesson, but I'm just as frustrated with the
    "Freenet" model as you are.

    Back in 1994, our enterprise wanted to be a "Freenet". Turns out there
    was a licensing fee: $20K, IIRC. Uh, no thanks -- so we became a
    "paynet". "Freenet" seemed like a scam.

    With careful cost accounting, we figured we could break even with a
    reasonable number of customers at $2/mo. That became our "charter
    member" fee, and we set it up so that folks could pay up to a year
    in advance before we raised the fees to $12/mo. These were fair
    prices for a BBS community that was itching to get on the Internet.

    "Support forums" were Usenet groups, and we had one especially for
    Linux. Today, forums like alt.os.linux and alt.os.linux.mint exist, and
    are fairly active. No reason that someone on Usenet couldn't get
    themselves running on Linux, as long as they can write to a USB drive
    and boot it. Linux Mint also has web forums for support. It's no
    different than most people experience with Windows.

    I will say one thing: I once contacted Microsoft Support about getting
    a download link for Access. (I was going to try to run it on proton, on Linux.) They were courteous and helpful. If someone started a service
    like that for Linux, they'd be sitting on a goldmine.

    --
    -v ASUS TUF DASH F15 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3060 Mobile 6G
    OS: Linux 6.8.0-60-generic D: Mint 22.1 DE: Xfce 4.18 Mem: 258G
    "No one ever said "if I'd only spent more time in the office""

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to vallor on Wed Jun 4 23:14:47 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Wed, 6/4/2025 10:44 PM, vallor wrote:
    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 21:17:15 -0400, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote in

    How do I put the ISO on the USB stick ?

    Beats me. How do you do it for Windows?

    This tool used to be hosted on the microsoftstore.com . That's
    a site where you could buy Windows 8 at the time. Like all USB stick
    utilities, it has its own peculiarities (some of the tools *insist*
    you put a partition on the stick, then they immediately *erase*
    the partition). This should handle Vista (truly obsolete now) to W11.

    Windows7-USB-DVD-Download-Tool.exe

    And the other one is Rufus.ie tool.
    Which does all sorts of stuff.

    Only a burned DVD has hybrid behavior. I don't think
    either tool manages that, and you have to decide which
    boot mode the stick will support (UEFI or legacy, pick one).

    Anything to do with booting, is always a rough ride. Imagine
    for example, you own a Dell and someone passes you what they
    thought was a decent USB stick preparation. The fun is only
    beginning. I dealt with a user once, their Dell was basically
    "crazy". It wouldn't do anything you asked it to do. Imagine
    getting Linux on that machine. It would try your patience as
    a helper. You can't even visualize what is going on and
    what to do next. Like, sometimes I can tell from a response,
    the shift lock is on. But every response the machine made,
    made no sense.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?8J+HtfCfh7FKYWNlayBNYXJja@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 5 05:32:11 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    W dniu 5.06.2025 o 03:17, Paul pisze:
    Seriously, I scanned the page and I don't see an action plan.
    How exactly will the software climb onto the PC ?

    This is totally unfair!!! KDE advertise Plasma, not distro. Distros are
    listed under URL linked in article:

    <https://kde.org/distributions/>

    And I try first of them:

    <https://fedoraproject.org/kde/>

    At the bottom of the page is button: "Download Now", it jump us to the:

    https://fedoraproject.org/kde/download

    And bellow this page we have... surprise!

    quote:"Fedora Media Writer
    Getting started with Fedora Linux is easier than ever. All you need is a
    4GB USB flash drive and the Fedora Media Writer utility.

    After Fedora Media Writer is installed, you can use it to write a "Live" version of Fedora Linux to a flash drive. You will then be able to boot
    from your flash drive and try Fedora Linux out without making any
    permanent changes to your computer. Once you are hooked, transferring
    Fedora Linux from the flash drive to your computer's hard drive is a
    matter of clicking a few buttons.* Learn more"

    So your nag that people don't know what to do with USB stick and ISO
    files are BS and evil propaganda!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?8J+HtfCfh7FKYWNlayBNYXJja@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 5 05:49:55 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    W dniu 5.06.2025 o 05:32, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 pisze:
    W dniu 5.06.2025 o 03:17, Paul pisze:
    Seriously, I scanned the page and I don't see an action plan.
    How exactly will the software climb onto the PC ?

    This is totally unfair!!! KDE advertise Plasma, not distro. Distros are listed under URL linked in article:

    <https://kde.org/distributions/>

    And I try first of them:

    <https://fedoraproject.org/kde/>

    At the bottom of the page is button: "Download Now", it jump us to the:

    https://fedoraproject.org/kde/download

    And bellow this page we have... surprise!

    quote:"Fedora Media Writer

    Other approach:

    Start your fav browser, type in the URL/search bar:

    how to install kubuntu

    In duckduckgo.com first link is:

    <https://userbase.kde.org/Kubuntu/Installation>

    Which not only allow check ISO file (with MD5 sum), but also guide how
    to write it on USB stick or DVD optical disc. Below is detailed
    instruction how install Kubuntu (screen shots included).


    Other approach:

    On the page: <https://kde.org/distributions/> I click:

    <https://neon.kde.org/download>

    And bellow this page we have... surprise!

    quote: "Install using KDE ISO Image Writer.

    Download the ISO file, use KDE ISO Image Writer (or on Mac we recommend
    ROSA Image Writer) to make a bootable USB drive with the ISO file and
    reboot using that USB drive.

    KDE ISO Image Writer
    ROSA Image Writer for Mac OS X
    GPG signatures signed by KDE neon ISO Signing Key (0x45F4C354638D1F29)
    are available alongside the ISOs for verification."


    But to be honest, not all distros seems to be that friendly like Fedora
    or Kubuntu or KDE Neon... But who care with such odds?!?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to ldo@nz.invalid on Thu Jun 5 07:06:50 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 00:41:09 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    “Your computer is toast

    “Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
    turn it into junk.

    “It may seem like it continues to work after that date for a bit, but when >Microsoft stops support for Windows 10, your perfectly good computer will
    be officially obsolete.

    “Windows 10 will degrade as more and more bugs come to light. With nobody >to correct them, you risk being hacked. Your data, identity, and control
    over your device could be stolen.

    “New versions of your apps will not run, but Microsoft will still block
    you from upgrading to the next version of Windows until you buy the new >computer they decide.”

    Scary? Yes. Exaggerated? No. Because that’s what Microsoft really wants to >do. Just like it has done so many times before.

    The computer on which I'm writing this is still running Windows XP.

    When my Windows 7 laptop was stolen I replaced it by a Windows 10
    machine, and insisted that they install the 32-bit version.

    I've not really had occasdion to call Microsoft support, though I'm
    aware that the help files will probably become inaccessible after
    Microsoft ceases its support, and follows its planned obsolescence
    policy.

    But if I downgrade to Windows 11, a lot of my software will stop
    weorking.

    There should be a law that says that when any commercial software firm
    ceases to support software, it should immediately be put in the public
    domain and made open source. A lot of institutions have "digitised"
    all sorts of records, and in some cases have destroyed the hard copy originals,. and as time goes by the digitised records become
    inaccessible, largely because of the planned obsolescence policies of
    bodies like Microsoft.







    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 5 00:24:34 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Wed, 6/4/2025 11:32 PM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:
    W dniu 5.06.2025 o 03:17, Paul pisze:
    Seriously, I scanned the page and I don't see an action plan.
    How exactly will the software climb onto the PC ?

    This is totally unfair!!! KDE advertise Plasma, not distro. Distros are listed under URL linked in article:

    <https://kde.org/distributions/>

    And I try first of them:

    <https://fedoraproject.org/kde/>

    At the bottom of the page is button: "Download Now", it jump us to the:

    https://fedoraproject.org/kde/download

    And bellow this page we have... surprise!

    quote:"Fedora Media Writer
    Getting started with Fedora Linux is easier than ever. All you need is a 4GB USB flash drive and the Fedora Media Writer utility.

    After Fedora Media Writer is installed, you can use it to write a "Live" version of Fedora Linux to a flash drive. You will then be able to boot from your flash drive and try Fedora Linux out without making any permanent changes to your computer. Once
    you are hooked, transferring Fedora Linux from the flash drive to your computer's hard drive is a matter of clicking a few buttons.* Learn more"

    So your nag that people don't know what to do with USB stick and ISO files are BS and evil propaganda!

    Under the behavior tab, in "Files Dropped", the Fedora Media Writer
    has references to "GoogleUpdater".

    https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/a83e7eb878f1e6eb40f12da647ac03b1e3ed5cb3026bc74a1d4ce9ee24d4262f/behavior

    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\137.0.7129.0
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\137.0.7129.0\Crashpad
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\137.0.7129.0\Crashpad\attachments C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\137.0.7129.0\Crashpad\metadata C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\137.0.7129.0\Crashpad\reports C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\137.0.7129.0\uninstall.cmd C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\137.0.7129.0\updater.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7156.0
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7156.0\Crashpad
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7156.0\Crashpad\attachments C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7156.0\Crashpad\metadata C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7156.0\Crashpad\reports C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7156.0\uninstall.cmd C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7156.0\updater.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7194.0
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7194.0\Crashpad
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7194.0\Crashpad\attachments C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7194.0\Crashpad\metadata C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7194.0\Crashpad\reports C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7194.0\uninstall.cmd C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\GoogleUpdater\138.0.7194.0\updater.exe

    Any idea what that is doing in a QT6 package ?

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Wed Jun 4 22:44:45 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/4/25 5:41 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    “It may seem like it continues to work after that date for a bit, but when Microsoft stops support for Windows 10, your perfectly good computer will
    be officially obsolete.

    That usually does not happen, unless you keep trying to put the
    latest software on it. If you freeze your OS, your should not
    see any of this stuff.

    KDE is a nice GUI for Linux. It was what Windows 7 was based on.
    But keep in mind, if you are deciding to switch from Windows
    to Linux, that Linux is much different. Most of the programs,
    outside of browsers and eMail, are different. And there is zero
    Adobe support. You will have to learn a lot of new things and
    different ways of doing things.

    Fortunately you can burn Live USB's and fly before you buy.
    There are several GUI options.

    https://fedoraproject.org/spins

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Thu Jun 5 05:22:32 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:06:50 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote:

    There should be a law that says that when any commercial software firm
    ceases to support software, it should immediately be put in the public
    domain and made open source.

    You really think Government intervention can make things better?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 4 23:26:59 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    Wow.

    Okay, I am a Linux shop and a YUGE advocate of Fedora Linux.
    I have to say though, the hype over W10 ending is really
    overblown. W11 is essentially W10 with an even stupider
    interface. Install Open Shell on it and you won't be able
    to tell the difference, unless you deliberately go looking
    for it. All your programs should still work. With Open
    Shell installed, there is really very little new to learn.

    Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking. Not
    minor like W10 to W11.

    My 2 cents.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Wed Jun 4 23:56:47 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/4/25 11:43 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:26:59 -0700, T wrote:

    Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking. Not minor like W10 to
    W11.

    The problem is that transitioning to Dimdows 11, for those who haven’t already done it, will mean junking their existing hardware and buying new machines. Linux offers the option to keep their existing hardware working, often even better than before.

    There are tons of ways around having to junk your
    old, functional computer to run W11. Rufus comes
    to mind.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 4 23:52:12 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/4/25 11:26 PM, T wrote:
    Wow.

    Okay, I am a Linux shop and a YUGE advocate of Fedora Linux.
    I have to say though, the hype over W10 ending is really
    overblown.  W11 is essentially W10 with an even stupider
    interface.  Install Open Shell on it and you won't be able
    to tell the difference, unless you deliberately go looking
    for it.  All your programs should still work.  With Open
    Shell installed, there is really very little new to learn.

    Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking.  Not
    minor like W10 to W11.

    My 2 cents.


    And there a ton of ways around W11's ridiculous hardware
    requirements

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 5 06:43:04 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:26:59 -0700, T wrote:

    Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking. Not minor like W10 to
    W11.

    The problem is that transitioning to Dimdows 11, for those who haven’t already done it, will mean junking their existing hardware and buying new machines. Linux offers the option to keep their existing hardware working, often even better than before.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Thu Jun 5 03:40:53 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 6/5/2025 2:43 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:26:59 -0700, T wrote:

    Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking. Not minor like W10 to
    W11.

    The problem is that transitioning to Dimdows 11, for those who haven’t already done it, will mean junking their existing hardware and buying new machines. Linux offers the option to keep their existing hardware working, often even better than before.


    I think I've already shown you my *licensed* copy of Windows 11
    running on a *4th gen* computer. And I don't think it has
    an MSA, either. Like T says, it's just a copy of windows 10,
    when you run it on ancient hardware like that -- just about
    all the Windows 11 features under the hood, switch themselves off.

    I haven't tried it, but you should be able to run Windows 11 on
    less than 1GB of RAM. That's because 8GB of RAM does not need to be
    reserved for AI (Qualcomm), and the 2.6GB sandbox image is not
    required either (sandbox disabled). It really should not need
    more RAM than Win10 at that point.

    to simulate low RAM, you can edit the BCD and cause the
    OS to not use all the RAM the machine has. You don't
    even need to pull RAM sticks out of the machine and throw
    them on the floor. You can disable some RAM using bcdedit.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 5 08:24:16 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:52:12 -0700, T wrote:

    And there a ton of ways around W11's ridiculous hardware requirements

    This is why they say, Windows is a great OS -- if your time is worth
    nothing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Thu Jun 5 02:28:43 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/5/25 1:24 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:52:12 -0700, T wrote:

    And there a ton of ways around W11's ridiculous hardware requirements

    This is why they say, Windows is a great OS -- if your time is worth
    nothing.

    Windows is indeed a irredeemable piece of crap.
    At best it can only be described as a kludge.

    Unfortunately, if the programs you need to run are
    only written for Windows, you are stuck with it.
    99% of everyone is stuck with it.

    Fortunately, Windows can be made somewhat stable with
    a few simple steps. Basically you debloat the hell
    out of it. Tiny 11 comes to mind. And you remove
    Fast Startup and shut the damned thing down at night.

    You can run Windows programs in Linux with the Wine
    application layer, but Wine is alpha stage code at
    best. Wine can be miserable to try to get to
    run your Windows programs, if at all -- speaking of
    your time being worth nothing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Borax Man@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Thu Jun 5 09:56:39 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.advocacy.]
    On 2025-06-05, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    “Your computer is toast

    “Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
    turn it into junk.

    “It may seem like it continues to work after that date for a bit, but when Microsoft stops support for Windows 10, your perfectly good computer will
    be officially obsolete.

    “Windows 10 will degrade as more and more bugs come to light. With nobody to correct them, you risk being hacked. Your data, identity, and control
    over your device could be stolen.

    “New versions of your apps will not run, but Microsoft will still block
    you from upgrading to the next version of Windows until you buy the new computer they decide.”

    Scary? Yes. Exaggerated? No. Because that’s what Microsoft really wants to do. Just like it has done so many times before.

    <https://kde.org/for/w10-exiles/>

    Essentially, Microsoft are making an Operating System that can't
    actually operate your computer, and convicing users that the deficiency
    is with them, the user and not with the OS, which just fails to run.
    The pertinent point here is that the requires system specs aren't really
    a "requirement", but a deficiency of the OS.

    This is an inversion of GNU/Linux, which is intended to run on whatever hardware it could feasibly run on.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Borax Man@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Thu Jun 5 10:02:39 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.advocacy.]
    On 2025-06-05, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:06:50 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote:

    There should be a law that says that when any commercial software firm
    ceases to support software, it should immediately be put in the public
    domain and made open source.

    You really think Government intervention can make things better?

    Well, copyright is a product of the government and the government
    determines the length of copyright protection. So the government is
    already involved.


    However, enforcing it become open source would be a new intervention,
    and one I don't think is warranted. Not when we already have a choice
    in many circumstances to chose something that is already open source.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to vallor on Thu Jun 5 13:26:27 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-06-05 04:44, vallor wrote:

    ...

    I will say one thing: I once contacted Microsoft Support about getting
    a download link for Access. (I was going to try to run it on proton, on Linux.) They were courteous and helpful. If someone started a service
    like that for Linux, they'd be sitting on a goldmine.

    Long ago, I got a support phone call from SuSE, trying to help me.

    You got I think it was 3 months free phone support for installation.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to vallor on Thu Jun 5 13:29:29 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-06-05 04:44, vallor wrote:
    "But what about MS Office?" someone may ask: For the most part,
    Office 365 works on Linux. (Alas, Access doesn't. That's the only
    reason I haven't moved my parents to Linux.)

    Funny. Few people use Access :-)

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to rbowman on Thu Jun 5 19:52:43 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-06-05 19:44, rbowman wrote:
    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:29:29 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-06-05 04:44, vallor wrote:
    "But what about MS Office?" someone may ask: For the most part, Office
    365 works on Linux. (Alas, Access doesn't. That's the only reason I
    haven't moved my parents to Linux.)

    Funny. Few people use Access :-)

    The ones that do have built their interfaces around Access and are locked
    to it forever.

    Yes, that is so.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 5 19:58:03 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-06-05 08:56, T wrote:
    On 6/4/25 11:43 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:26:59 -0700, T wrote:

    Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking.  Not minor like W10 to
    W11.

    The problem is that transitioning to Dimdows 11, for those who haven’t
    already done it, will mean junking their existing hardware and buying new
    machines. Linux offers the option to keep their existing hardware
    working,
    often even better than before.

    There are tons of ways around having to junk your
    old, functional computer to run W11.  Rufus comes
    to mind.

    Most of the methods I have seen involve a fresh install of W11 instead
    of an upgrade of W10→11

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Thu Jun 5 17:44:19 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:29:29 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2025-06-05 04:44, vallor wrote:
    "But what about MS Office?" someone may ask: For the most part, Office
    365 works on Linux. (Alas, Access doesn't. That's the only reason I
    haven't moved my parents to Linux.)

    Funny. Few people use Access :-)

    The ones that do have built their interfaces around Access and are locked
    to it forever.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Thu Jun 5 18:39:00 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 6/5/2025 1:58 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-06-05 08:56, T wrote:
    On 6/4/25 11:43 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:26:59 -0700, T wrote:

    Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking.  Not minor like W10 to
    W11.

    The problem is that transitioning to Dimdows 11, for those who haven’t >>> already done it, will mean junking their existing hardware and buying new >>> machines. Linux offers the option to keep their existing hardware working, >>> often even better than before.

    There are tons of ways around having to junk your
    old, functional computer to run W11.  Rufus comes
    to mind.

    Most of the methods I have seen involve a fresh install of W11 instead of an upgrade of W10→11


    You can plug in the Rufus stick, run setup.exe off it,
    and partake of the bypasses it provides. That means,
    not only can you boot the Rufus stick and do a Clean Install,
    you can also use it as a container for an Upgrade Install.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 5 23:23:44 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Jun 4, 2025 at 8:41:09 PM EDT, "Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    “Your computer is toast

    No it isn't.

    “Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
    turn it into junk.

    No they don't. This is all nonsense.

    Windows 10 will continue to run just fine. Windows 10 will continue to get AV updates. I am still getting Windows Defender updates to Windows 8.1.

    Windows 10 will have a longer life than XP did.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Thu Jun 5 23:27:25 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 19:52:43 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:29:29 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    The ones that do have built their interfaces around Access and are
    locked to it forever.

    Yes, that is so.

    Well, either they consider their IT a strategic competitive asset, or they don’t. If they do, then betting their business on inflexible software that
    is incapable of adapting to modern needs is going to rebound on them
    sooner or later.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Thu Jun 5 23:33:46 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 23:23:44 +0000, Tyrone wrote:

    Windows 10 will continue to run just fine.

    Only if you have the expertise to cope with its (in)compatibility quirks.
    Which not many Windows users do.

    Windows 10 will have a longer life than XP did.

    XP actually had an artificially-extended life, because Microsoft needed something to compete with the Linux-based netbooks, and Vista certainly wasn’t cutting it.

    10 doesn’t seem to have any corresponding excuse.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 5 23:31:15 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 02:28:43 -0700, T wrote:

    Unfortunately, if the programs you need to run are only written for
    Windows, you are stuck with it. 99% of everyone is stuck with it.

    Actually, the proportion is a bit less nowadays. Free Software tends to be invisible in the marketplace because money isn’t changing hands.

    You can run Windows programs in Linux with the Wine application layer,
    but Wine is alpha stage code at best.

    It seems to be good enough to run the majority of Windows-specific games
    on the Steam Deck. That product has created a whole new market category, handheld PC gaming, where the Windows-based competitors are really
    struggling to gain a foothold.

    And, you have to admit, games are among the most difficult things to run properly under an emulator.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 5 23:34:38 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 03:07:57 -0700, T wrote:

    When M$ see your system does not have the requirements to run its stupid spyware, it just wont install it. Yippee!

    Or maybe it will just say it’s not installing it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Thu Jun 5 17:36:42 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/5/25 4:31 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 02:28:43 -0700, T wrote:

    Unfortunately, if the programs you need to run are only written for
    Windows, you are stuck with it. 99% of everyone is stuck with it.

    Actually, the proportion is a bit less nowadays. Free Software tends to be invisible in the marketplace because money isn’t changing hands.


    My biggest problem, and that is Windows or Linux, is trying
    to get users to learn new things when I can no longer get
    their old stuff to work under whatever operating system
    they are running.

    A prime example of this is LibreOffice, which I do use myself.
    LO has to be, not similar, but "EXACTLY" the same as M$ Office
    or they blow a cork. Oh and they wont pay for the upgrade
    to the new version of M$ Office.

    Gimp and Inkscape are great product, but they are not EXACTLY
    the same as their Adobe's products.

    It seems that most customer have a window in they brains
    where they learn new things, but after that, their brains
    shut down. I have had a customer jump out of her chair
    once, whilst instilling something their business owner
    directed me to install (his choice, not mine) and scream
    in my face "I CAN'T LEARN ANYTHING NEW!!!"

    So if you are going to transition to Linux from Windows,
    you have to be able to learn different ways of doing things.

    My office is a Linux office. I support Windows and have
    several qemu-kvm virtual machines of various Windows releases,
    but only use them for supporting customers. The differences
    do not bother me. But then again, in this business, you
    are always learning. It never stops.

    I do adore bigger, better, faster. One of my major gripes
    with Windows and Wine especially, is that it is neither.
    Both are typically one step forward and two steps backwards.

    I do use GNU Cash. It is has a bloody difficult learning curve,
    but once you get there, it is a wonderful tool. I can't see
    any of my customer abandoning QuickBooks (a Linux killer) for it.
    Too much "new" to learn.

    You can run Windows programs in Linux with the Wine application layer,
    but Wine is alpha stage code at best.

    It seems to be good enough to run the majority of Windows-specific games
    on the Steam Deck. That product has created a whole new market category, handheld PC gaming, where the Windows-based competitors are really
    struggling to gain a foothold.

    And, you have to admit, games are among the most difficult things to run properly under an emulator.


    Wine is actually an application layer. They get their nickers
    in a twist if you call it an emulator. Chuckle.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 6 01:50:00 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 17:36:42 -0700, T wrote:

    A prime example of this is LibreOffice, which I do use myself. LO has to
    be, not similar, but "EXACTLY" the same as M$ Office or they blow a
    cork.

    Interesting, because Microsoft Office is notorious for formatting inconsistencies just from moving documents between different machines. If
    they will put up with that, why should they complain about LibreOffice,
    which does a better job anyway?

    Oh and they wont pay for the upgrade to the new version of M$ Office.

    But they will pay for Adobe’s products??

    Wine is actually an application layer. They get their nickers in a
    twist if you call it an emulator.

    Try looking up “emulator” in the dictionary?

    Wine is no more “not an emulator” than GNU is “not Unix”.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to ldo@nz.invalid on Fri Jun 6 05:01:05 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 05:22:32 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:06:50 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote:

    There should be a law that says that when any commercial software firm
    ceases to support software, it should immediately be put in the public
    domain and made open source.

    You really think Government intervention can make things better?

    It would depend on the nature of the intervention. In this case, yes.

    People before profit.




    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Thu Jun 5 21:46:02 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/5/25 6:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 17:36:42 -0700, T wrote:

    A prime example of this is LibreOffice, which I do use myself. LO has to
    be, not similar, but "EXACTLY" the same as M$ Office or they blow a
    cork.

    Interesting, because Microsoft Office is notorious for formatting inconsistencies just from moving documents between different machines. If they will put up with that, why should they complain about LibreOffice,
    which does a better job anyway?

    Oh and they wont pay for the upgrade to the new version of M$ Office.

    But they will pay for Adobe’s products??

    Once and nothing after that


    Wine is actually an application layer. They get their nickers in a
    twist if you call it an emulator.

    Try looking up “emulator” in the dictionary?

    Wine is no more “not an emulator” than GNU is “not Unix”.

    Excellent point.

    Here is what the grouches at Wine say about it:

    https://www.winehq.org/about

    Wine (originally an acronym for "Wine Is Not an Emulator")
    is a compatibility layer capable of running Windows applications
    on several POSIX-compliant operating systems, such as Linux,
    macOS, & BSD. Instead of simulating internal Windows logic
    like a virtual machine or emulator, Wine translates Windows
    API calls into POSIX calls on-the-fly, eliminating the
    performance and memory penalties of other methods and
    allowing you to cleanly integrate Windows applications
    into your desktop.

    It is still an emulator though.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 6 05:41:08 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 21:46:02 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/5/25 6:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    But they will pay for Adobe’s products??

    Once and nothing after that

    But all Adobe’s stuff is rentware now. Stop paying and you lose control of your own work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Thu Jun 5 23:08:28 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/5/25 10:41 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 21:46:02 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/5/25 6:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    But they will pay for Adobe’s products??

    Once and nothing after that

    But all Adobe’s stuff is rentware now. Stop paying and you lose control of your own work.

    And Autocad, Solidworks, M$ Office 365, QuickBooks Desktop,
    and several others too. I personally despise rentware.

    Autocad and Solidworks are now so expensive to rent
    that it puts small businesses out of business or on to
    other products.

    These customers have older revisions. And often times
    they are on the latest OS and are pissed that their
    old stuff stopped working properly.

    Best solution is to run an older OS in a virtual machine
    with their old software loaded on it. I do this with
    Fedora 39 so I can run Wine 9.1 to get around all the
    accursed bugs Wine has added to their current versions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 6 07:30:10 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 23:08:28 -0700, T wrote:

    These customers have older revisions. And often times they are on the
    latest OS and are pissed that their old stuff stopped working properly.

    Would you entrust mission-critical business operations to obsolete,
    unsupported software?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chrisv@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Fri Jun 6 03:02:01 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    Tyrone wrote:

    Windows 10 will continue to get AV updates.

    If you pay extra for that extended support, right?

    --
    "Stop the distribution of the day and fix the ones already out there.
    Better yet settle on one and pool the resources to make a super
    distribution that might actually have a prayer of killing off
    Windows." - Flathead

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to chrisv on Fri Jun 6 05:01:35 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6/6/2025 4:02 AM, chrisv wrote:
    Tyrone wrote:

    Windows 10 will continue to get AV updates.

    If you pay extra for that extended support, right?


    These are updated daily. When you air-gap a Windows, you can "bring over"
    a definition update and install it on an OS. I've done this on numerous occasions, to give the AV something to do :-) Naturally, there are two
    parts to these -- if a definition needed a newer parser to read it, that's
    an issue. For unsupported OSes, that is less likely to happen. At a minimum this gives a rough equivalent to a Cisco TALOS ClamAV (in other words,
    limited heuristic capabilities, but still has some value and could
    detect Sality inbound).

    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/wdsi/defenderupdates

    "Windows Defender in Windows 7 and Windows Vista 32-bit | 64-bit"

    But effort is put into those, and it "counts as support". It
    gets done, because it's a part of the active support structure
    for the later OSes, and is just a derivative output file. Just as a lot
    of "junior AV companies" may rely on ClamAV for their definition files.
    Roughly a third of branded AV products are junk (but you have to start somewhere). For example, Malwarebytes started as a heuristic product,
    only detecting "novel intrusions" and stopping them. Only later
    did it get signatures to scan, and so it would have started on
    a diet of ClamAV at first. It might take a staff of 200, to do a
    viable ClamAV equivalent. Three guys in moms basement, can't keep up.

    The junk AV products, don't have the 30 unpackers necessary to check
    obfuscated files. And this shows up as a recurring pattern in
    Google Virustotal scan results (product "could not open" file).
    That's how you can tell what is junk, if it can't even handle an executable-packer. The companies with a staff of 1200-2000 are capable
    of making worthwhile products (that's if they don't add too much FUD junk and snakeoil).

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Jun 6 01:18:26 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/6/25 12:30 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 23:08:28 -0700, T wrote:

    These customers have older revisions. And often times they are on the
    latest OS and are pissed that their old stuff stopped working properly.

    Would you entrust mission-critical business operations to obsolete, unsupported software?

    Yes and no. If the obsolete software runs your
    mission-critical perfectly, then yes. Freeze
    everything.

    This is the objective behind Red Had Enterprise
    Linux. Freeze old versions of Fedora. Bugs and
    all. If the bugs do not affect you, all is good.
    You essentially turn your computer into an "appliance".
    Do not add things to it or upgrade it, ever.

    On the other hand, if you are in a Kaisen situation,
    you want the more recent stuff. Fedora is
    a good example of next to bleeding edge. (Arch
    is bleeding edge and not for the faint of heart.)

    I adore Fedora. Fedora's tester do a damned good job.
    hardly anything escapes them. They are not perfect
    though. Next to perfect.

    A really bad example is M$'s horrific updates. You
    have a "supported" operating system that is constantly
    breaking things. One customer told me that M$'s updates
    have done more damage to his business than any virus
    ever has.

    I also do Payment Card Industry (PCI) consulting.
    You are required to have a "supported" operating
    system. And Point-of-Sale software is foolishly
    (I cleaned up the swear word) written on Windows.
    So every M$ update is a very stressful experience, not
    to mention the down time they take.

    So, pick your poison. The answer depends on your
    situation. I would refuse to fly in a space craft
    run on Windows, support or not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to Joel on Fri Jun 6 20:11:48 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/06/2025 1:08 am, Joel wrote:
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:26:59 -0700, T wrote:

    Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking. Not minor like W10 to
    W11.

    The problem is that transitioning to Dimdows 11, for those who haven’t
    already done it, will mean junking their existing hardware and buying new
    machines. Linux offers the option to keep their existing hardware working, >> often even better than before.

    Amen, but it should be noted, Linux is better than Windows on Win11-
    capable machines, too.

    In a related, but different, line ..... does Apple regularly Dead
    End/Obsolete their Macs or is a (say) 2020 Mac still capable of running
    the latest Mac OS??

    A 2015 Mac??

    A 2010 Mac??
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 6 20:24:53 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/06/2025 10:36 am, T wrote:
    On 6/5/25 4:31 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    <Snip>

    I do use GNU Cash.  It is has a bloody difficult learning curve,
    but once you get there, it is a wonderful tool.  I can't see
    any of my customer abandoning QuickBooks (a Linux killer) for it.
    Too much "new" to learn.

    You can run Windows programs in Linux with the Wine application layer,
    but Wine is alpha stage code at best.

    It seems to be good enough to run the majority of Windows-specific games
    on the Steam Deck. That product has created a whole new market category,
    handheld PC gaming, where the Windows-based competitors are really
    struggling to gain a foothold.

    And, you have to admit, games are among the most difficult things to run
    properly under an emulator.

    Wine is actually an application layer.  They get their nickers
    in a twist if you call it an emulator.  Chuckle.


    T, what would be the possibility of setting your customers up to use
    Linux .... and then, for those 'special' programs (like QuickBooks)
    giving your customers a desktop icon called 'QuickBooks' which actually
    boots Wine and opens 'QuickBooks'??

    Sure, it could end up with several copies of Wine running, each
    operating different Windows programs but it would be "DO"able, wouldn't it??
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Fri Jun 6 04:02:00 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/5/25 4:23 PM, Tyrone wrote:
    On Jun 4, 2025 at 8:41:09 PM EDT, "Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    “Your computer is toast

    No it isn't.

    “Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
    turn it into junk.

    No they don't. This is all nonsense.

    Windows 10 will continue to run just fine. Windows 10 will continue to get AV updates. I am still getting Windows Defender updates to Windows 8.1.

    Windows 10 will have a longer life than XP did.

    Agreed!

    Just get a good Anti Virus and W10 will run just fine without
    M$'s pesky update that you risk crashing your machine every
    time you install one. This is a blessing in disguise

    If you want W11, use Rufus to make a Flash drive up with the
    W11 ISO. Rufus gives you the ability to get around the
    hardware requirements and the now mandatory spyware account.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 6 04:04:46 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/6/25 3:11 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
    On 6/06/2025 1:08 am, Joel wrote:

    In a related, but different, line ..... does Apple regularly Dead End/ Obsolete their Macs or is a (say) 2020 Mac still capable of running the latest Mac OS??

    A 2015 Mac??

    A 2010 Mac??

    Yes they do. Apple is a total pain in the ass about it.
    Get new hardware of no new OS.

    OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 6 03:55:54 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/6/25 3:24 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
    T, what would be the possibility of setting your customers up to use
    Linux .... and then, for those 'special' programs (like QuickBooks)
    giving your customers a desktop icon called 'QuickBooks' which actually
    boots Wine and opens 'QuickBooks'??

    The possibility would be zero. QuickBooks Desktop does not
    run under Wine. Wine is alpha code at best and is riddled
    with bugs.

    Quickbooks is trying to get everyone to switch to their
    online (cloud) version. Users hate it, but it would allow
    for using it with virtually any OS'es browser. I personally
    prefer programs that run on the "edge". "Cloud" is "client /
    server" with a really crappy connection between the two.

    A better was is to put Windows in a virtual machine, but
    that required a user that is computer savvy. Computer savvy
    users do not need me. And it would add a layer of complication.
    It is better for me to just debloat Windows.

    Chuckle, I did something like this to an ass hole at a custom's
    site once. My handler had me install Firefox on everyone's computers
    for security purposes. The Ass Hole gave me a bunch of lip
    about switching from Internet Explorer. So I made Firefox's
    icon Internet Explorer's icon. Left the name as Firefox though.

    Next time I saw the ass hole, he pompously got in my face and
    told me he could do everything with Internet Explorer and did
    not need Firefox. Guess what icon he was clicking on. It was
    everything I could do to keep from laughing in his face!

    Sure, it could end up with several copies of Wine running, each
    operating different Windows programs but it would be "DO"able, wouldn't
    it??

    Depends on the program. I have a few that run
    wonderful under Wine. They are usually small programs
    though. Anything complicated won't run.

    And you risk a Wine update crashing them. Happens to me all
    the time. Wine usually fixed them, but it usually
    takes them over a year. I run a Fedora 39 virtual machine
    with it older 6.1 version of Wine in it to get around Wine
    7,8,9,10's bugs.

    I wish I had more Linux users. They are mostly training and
    configuring. Windows uses is fixing endless system issues.
    Lately with W11, there are a bunch of what I call "one off"
    issues, where they are the only once in the world with the
    problem, So, the web is no help because no one else has
    experienced it. So far I have always conquered though.
    I "may" have said a few bad words under my breath.
    Not saying.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Jun 6 04:14:28 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/5/25 4:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 19:52:43 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:29:29 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    The ones that do have built their interfaces around Access and are
    locked to it forever.

    Yes, that is so.

    Well, either they consider their IT a strategic competitive asset, or they don’t. If they do, then betting their business on inflexible software that is incapable of adapting to modern needs is going to rebound on them
    sooner or later.


    The problem is that most businesses do not want to adapt to
    anything. They want what they have to continue working.
    Period.

    And you have the "I don't want to learn anything new " crowd.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Fri Jun 6 04:15:20 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/5/25 4:29 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-06-05 04:44, vallor wrote:
    "But what about MS Office?" someone may ask:  For the most part,
    Office 365 works on Linux.  (Alas, Access doesn't.  That's the only
    reason I haven't moved my parents to Linux.)

    Funny. Few people use Access :-)



    I still use Lotus Approach. Wish it was still supported.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 6 22:11:41 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/06/2025 9:04 pm, T wrote:
    On 6/6/25 3:11 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
    On 6/06/2025 1:08 am, Joel wrote:

    In a related, but different, line ..... does Apple regularly Dead End/
    Obsolete their Macs or is a (say) 2020 Mac still capable of running
    the latest Mac OS??

    A 2015 Mac??

    A 2010 Mac??

    Yes they do.  Apple is a total pain in the ass about it.
    Get new hardware of no new OS.

    OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.

    Thanks for reply, T.

    Can't say I've heard any rumbling from them ..... maybe because they are
    only, what, 15 - 20% of the Computing World.

    Or is it just that I don't 'frequent' those places??
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 6 18:14:33 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:14:28 -0700, T wrote:

    The problem is that most businesses do not want to adapt to anything.
    They want what they have to continue working. Period.

    And you have the "I don't want to learn anything new " crowd.

    We had a users group with a yearly meeting. The users would submit
    requests for enhancements that we would do if they were feasible.
    Invariably when the new release was rolled out there were the 'What is
    this? It didn't use to work like that!'.

    Then there was an actual bug that I fixed that allowed unsupported
    behavior. One site had exploited the bug and were upset when they could no longer attach the same resource to several different incidents.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 6 18:08:38 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 22:11:41 +1000, Daniel70 wrote:

    On 6/06/2025 9:04 pm, T wrote:
    On 6/6/25 3:11 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
    On 6/06/2025 1:08 am, Joel wrote:

    In a related, but different, line ..... does Apple regularly Dead End/
    Obsolete their Macs or is a (say) 2020 Mac still capable of running
    the latest Mac OS??

    A 2015 Mac??

    A 2010 Mac??

    Yes they do.  Apple is a total pain in the ass about it.
    Get new hardware of no new OS.

    OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.

    Thanks for reply, T.

    Can't say I've heard any rumbling from them ..... maybe because they are only, what, 15 - 20% of the Computing World.

    Or is it just that I don't 'frequent' those places??

    I don't know if Apple customers are insanely happy with the products or if
    the moderators are iron fisted but on r/apple there seldom is heard a discouraging word.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 6 14:46:08 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6/6/2025 6:24 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
    On 6/06/2025 10:36 am, T wrote:
    On 6/5/25 4:31 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    <Snip>

    I do use GNU Cash.  It is has a bloody difficult learning curve,
    but once you get there, it is a wonderful tool.  I can't see
    any of my customer abandoning QuickBooks (a Linux killer) for it.
    Too much "new" to learn.

    You can run Windows programs in Linux with the Wine application layer, >>>> but Wine is alpha stage code at best.

    It seems to be good enough to run the majority of Windows-specific games >>> on the Steam Deck. That product has created a whole new market category, >>> handheld PC gaming, where the Windows-based competitors are really
    struggling to gain a foothold.

    And, you have to admit, games are among the most difficult things to run >>> properly under an emulator.

    Wine is actually an application layer.  They get their nickers
    in a twist if you call it an emulator.  Chuckle.


    T, what would be the possibility of setting your customers up to use Linux .... and then, for those 'special' programs (like QuickBooks) giving your customers a desktop icon called 'QuickBooks' which actually boots Wine and opens 'QuickBooks'??

    Sure, it could end up with several copies of Wine running, each operating different Windows programs but it would be "DO"able, wouldn't it??

    Commercial softwares use licensing mechanisms.
    Those mechanisms aren't always compatible with WINE.

    One guy wrote a piece of software, the software could
    detect exactly where it was, whether it was in a VM,
    under WINE, on native hardware. In fact, the location
    capability it had at the time, was more impressive than
    the software it was protecting.

    WINE is not intended to defeat license mechanisms. Via
    DMCA, you could find yourself in jail doing that. As
    a consequence, there is a very fine line to tread, to
    avoiding "trouble".

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 6 14:35:13 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6/6/2025 8:11 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
    On 6/06/2025 9:04 pm, T wrote:
    On 6/6/25 3:11 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
    On 6/06/2025 1:08 am, Joel wrote:

    In a related, but different, line ..... does Apple regularly Dead End/ Obsolete their Macs or is a (say) 2020 Mac still capable of running the latest Mac OS??

    A 2015 Mac??

    A 2010 Mac??

    Yes they do.  Apple is a total pain in the ass about it.
    Get new hardware of no new OS.

    OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.

    Thanks for reply, T.

    Can't say I've heard any rumbling from them ..... maybe because they are only, what, 15 - 20% of the Computing World.

    Or is it just that I don't 'frequent' those places??

    They have used 68000, PowerPC, Intel, ARM.

    That gives opportunities for throwing customers
    onto the side of the road.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to rbowman on Fri Jun 6 16:27:49 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/6/25 11:14 AM, rbowman wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:14:28 -0700, T wrote:

    The problem is that most businesses do not want to adapt to anything.
    They want what they have to continue working. Period.

    And you have the "I don't want to learn anything new " crowd.

    We had a users group with a yearly meeting. The users would submit
    requests for enhancements that we would do if they were feasible.
    Invariably when the new release was rolled out there were the 'What is
    this? It didn't use to work like that!'.

    Then there was an actual bug that I fixed that allowed unsupported
    behavior. One site had exploited the bug and were upset when they could no longer attach the same resource to several different incidents.


    You just can't win. :'(

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to rbowman on Fri Jun 6 16:29:31 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/6/25 11:08 AM, rbowman wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 22:11:41 +1000, Daniel70 wrote:

    On 6/06/2025 9:04 pm, T wrote:
    On 6/6/25 3:11 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
    On 6/06/2025 1:08 am, Joel wrote:

    In a related, but different, line ..... does Apple regularly Dead End/ >>>> Obsolete their Macs or is a (say) 2020 Mac still capable of running
    the latest Mac OS??

    A 2015 Mac??

    A 2010 Mac??

    Yes they do.  Apple is a total pain in the ass about it.
    Get new hardware of no new OS.

    OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.

    Thanks for reply, T.

    Can't say I've heard any rumbling from them ..... maybe because they are
    only, what, 15 - 20% of the Computing World.

    Or is it just that I don't 'frequent' those places??

    I don't know if Apple customers are insanely happy with the products or if the moderators are iron fisted but on r/apple there seldom is heard a discouraging word.



    The only Apple power uses I have come across are
    graphics developers. The reset are just web and eMail.
    They would be far better suited with a tablet,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 7 00:49:23 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:14:28 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/5/25 4:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    Well, either they consider their IT a strategic competitive asset, or
    they don’t. If they do, then betting their business on inflexible
    software that is incapable of adapting to modern needs is going to
    rebound on them sooner or later.

    The problem is that most businesses do not want to adapt to anything.
    They want what they have to continue working. Period.

    That’s fine. So they get out-competed by somebody who pays more attention
    to IT being a strategic competitive asset, and go out of business. No need
    to feel any sympathy for them.

    And you have the "I don't want to learn anything new " crowd.

    For a business that persists in employing such people, see above.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 7 00:53:17 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 01:18:26 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/6/25 12:30 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 23:08:28 -0700, T wrote:

    These customers have older revisions. And often times they are on the
    latest OS and are pissed that their old stuff stopped working
    properly.

    Would you entrust mission-critical business operations to obsolete,
    unsupported software?

    Yes and no. If the obsolete software runs your mission-critical
    perfectly, then yes. Freeze everything.

    Wrong answer. The answer is no.

    This is the objective behind Red Had Enterprise Linux. Freeze old
    versions of Fedora. Bugs and all.

    That’s not how it works. They do fix bugs in RHEL, you know, for as long
    as the old version is supported. That’s what’s meant by “supported”.

    I also do Payment Card Industry (PCI) consulting.
    You are required to have a "supported" operating system. And
    Point-of-Sale software is foolishly (I cleaned up the swear word)
    written on Windows.
    So every M$ update is a very stressful experience, not to mention the
    down time they take.

    Seems like there is an opportunity for a competitor to bring out a non- Windows-based alternative that offers lower support costs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 7 00:47:42 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:

    I still use Lotus Approach.

    Hopefully not for anything important.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 7 00:50:40 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:04:46 -0700, T wrote:

    OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.

    It’s officially “Unix”, but it doesn’t quite work the way people expect when they think of “Unix”.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Jun 6 19:03:27 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/6/25 5:53 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 01:18:26 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/6/25 12:30 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 23:08:28 -0700, T wrote:

    These customers have older revisions. And often times they are on the >>>> latest OS and are pissed that their old stuff stopped working
    properly.

    Would you entrust mission-critical business operations to obsolete,
    unsupported software?

    Yes and no. If the obsolete software runs your mission-critical
    perfectly, then yes. Freeze everything.

    Wrong answer. The answer is no.


    Hmmmmm.... It still depends on your situation.



    This is the objective behind Red Had Enterprise Linux. Freeze old
    versions of Fedora. Bugs and all.

    That’s not how it works. They do fix bugs in RHEL, you know, for as long
    as the old version is supported. That’s what’s meant by “supported”.

    Ever try to get them to fix anything? I have. It is like
    pulling teeth. Their "support" is horrible. They really,
    really want to stay locked down. Your fix could break
    others working software.

    I also do Payment Card Industry (PCI) consulting.
    You are required to have a "supported" operating system. And
    Point-of-Sale software is foolishly (I cleaned up the swear word)
    written on Windows.
    So every M$ update is a very stressful experience, not to mention the
    down time they take.

    Seems like there is an opportunity for a competitor to bring out a non- Windows-based alternative that offers lower support costs.

    You would think.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Jun 6 19:00:19 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/6/25 5:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:04:46 -0700, T wrote:

    OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.

    It’s officially “Unix”, but it doesn’t quite work the way people expect
    when they think of “Unix”.

    The grouches on OSx forums get testy with you if you call
    it Unix. They demand you call it POSIX. It is still Unix.
    Chuckle.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Jun 6 19:11:45 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/6/25 5:49 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:14:28 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/5/25 4:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    Well, either they consider their IT a strategic competitive asset, or
    they don’t. If they do, then betting their business on inflexible
    software that is incapable of adapting to modern needs is going to
    rebound on them sooner or later.

    The problem is that most businesses do not want to adapt to anything.
    They want what they have to continue working. Period.

    That’s fine. So they get out-competed by somebody who pays more attention to IT being a strategic competitive asset, and go out of business. No need
    to feel any sympathy for them.

    Small business, which is my customer base, thrive on keeping
    costs down. They see IT as a despised expense to be avoided.
    I really do no like walking into a new customer with them
    thinking I am a con man. Backup? UPS power supplies?
    Ethernet instead of wireless? Anti Virus? They act like I
    am some sort of criminal. Well, until they get to know me.
    There is a lot of fraud in all professions.

    And you have the "I don't want to learn anything new " crowd.

    For a business that persists in employing such people, see above.

    There is a livestock feed store in town that has no computers.
    They listed all the lost income their competitions had from
    crashes and such. They are ahead of the curve cost wise.
    So, it depends on how serious you are about your IT if you
    actually get any benefit out of it. If you chisel your
    IT to keep costs down, you wind up taking it in the shorts.

    One customer I had, does not upgrade any hardware until
    it dies. When their server went down, it really cost and
    hurt them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 7 02:13:53 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:00:19 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/6/25 5:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:04:46 -0700, T wrote:

    OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.

    It’s officially “Unix”, but it doesn’t quite work the way people expect
    when they think of “Unix”.

    The grouches on OSx forums get testy with you if you call it Unix. They demand you call it POSIX. It is still Unix.

    Calling it “POSIX” doesn’t really help <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOeku3hDzrM>.

    This is why a lot of people say “*nix”. It dodges the trademark, even
    as the name “Unix” still occurs in some of the details. For example,
    the “Unix philosophy” is a core part of this. E.g. the system should
    be a bunch of toolkits that implement only mechanism, without imposing
    a particular policy: let the users/admins/developers implement
    whatever policies they want with the help of those toolkits.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Jun 6 19:13:23 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/6/25 5:47 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:

    I still use Lotus Approach.

    Hopefully not for anything important.

    I wrote my companies accounting system in it.
    Yes, it is important.

    I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
    it is horrible to the point of being unusable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 7 02:42:21 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:13:23 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/6/25 5:47 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:

    I still use Lotus Approach.

    Hopefully not for anything important.

    I wrote my companies accounting system in it.
    Yes, it is important.

    I used to use FileMaker Pro on a Macintosh, for two main business-related systems that I had developed myself: my time-and-billing system, and
    cheque reconciliation.

    When I went to Linux, I wrote Python programs for doing both tasks: the
    first on top of MySQL/MariaDB, the latter on top of SQLite.

    For an example of the difference, my cheque reconciliation database
    involved running AppleScript code to match up the stub entries and the statement entries. The Linux/Python version would finish the entire task
    in the time it took for the Mac/AppleScript version to find the first
    record.

    I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
    it is horrible to the point of being unusable.

    LibreOffice Base has its own built-in DBMS, but it can also act as a
    front-end to things like MySQL/MariaDB and SQLite, among others -- and
    either one of those can run rings around Microsoft Access. Think of
    LO:Base just as a GUI front-end tool to a *real* DBMS.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Jun 6 20:19:40 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/6/25 7:13 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:00:19 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/6/25 5:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:04:46 -0700, T wrote:

    OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.

    It’s officially “Unix”, but it doesn’t quite work the way people expect
    when they think of “Unix”.

    The grouches on OSx forums get testy with you if you call it Unix. They
    demand you call it POSIX. It is still Unix.

    Calling it “POSIX” doesn’t really help <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOeku3hDzrM>.

    This is why a lot of people say “*nix”. It dodges the trademark, even
    as the name “Unix” still occurs in some of the details. For example,
    the “Unix philosophy” is a core part of this. E.g. the system should
    be a bunch of toolkits that implement only mechanism, without imposing
    a particular policy: let the users/admins/developers implement
    whatever policies they want with the help of those toolkits.

    That explains it! Thank you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Jun 6 20:17:58 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/6/25 7:42 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:13:23 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/6/25 5:47 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:

    I still use Lotus Approach.

    Hopefully not for anything important.

    I wrote my companies accounting system in it.
    Yes, it is important.

    I used to use FileMaker Pro on a Macintosh, for two main business-related systems that I had developed myself: my time-and-billing system, and
    cheque reconciliation.

    When I went to Linux, I wrote Python programs for doing both tasks: the
    first on top of MySQL/MariaDB, the latter on top of SQLite.

    For an example of the difference, my cheque reconciliation database
    involved running AppleScript code to match up the stub entries and the statement entries. The Linux/Python version would finish the entire task
    in the time it took for the Mac/AppleScript version to find the first
    record.

    It took me six months to write and has had constant maintenance
    for the last 30 years. If I lose the ability to run it, I might
    as well retire and close my business.

    So I do feel for others in the same situation.

    I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
    it is horrible to the point of being unusable.

    LibreOffice Base has its own built-in DBMS, but it can also act as a front-end to things like MySQL/MariaDB and SQLite, among others -- and
    either one of those can run rings around Microsoft Access. Think of
    LO:Base just as a GUI front-end tool to a *real* DBMS.

    The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs.
    The bugs. The bugs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 7 04:50:48 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 20:17:58 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/6/25 7:42 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:13:23 -0700, T wrote:

    I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
    it is horrible to the point of being unusable.

    LibreOffice Base has its own built-in DBMS, but it can also act as a
    front-end to things like MySQL/MariaDB and SQLite, among others -- and
    either one of those can run rings around Microsoft Access. Think of
    LO:Base just as a GUI front-end tool to a *real* DBMS.

    The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs.
    The bugs. The bugs.

    What sorts of bugs? Are they still in current versions? Have you reported
    any of them?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 7 04:53:31 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 20:19:40 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/6/25 7:13 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    For example, the “Unix philosophy” is a core part of this. E.g. the
    system should be a bunch of toolkits that implement only mechanism,
    without imposing a particular policy: let the
    users/admins/developers implement whatever policies they want with
    the help of those toolkits.

    That explains it! Thank you.

    Also, I would say that macOS in its current form no longer conforms to
    that “Unix philosophy”. For example, it enforces a particular GUI, inextricably bound into the OS kernel.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Jun 6 23:22:17 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/6/25 9:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 20:17:58 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/6/25 7:42 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:13:23 -0700, T wrote:

    I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
    it is horrible to the point of being unusable.

    LibreOffice Base has its own built-in DBMS, but it can also act as a
    front-end to things like MySQL/MariaDB and SQLite, among others -- and
    either one of those can run rings around Microsoft Access. Think of
    LO:Base just as a GUI front-end tool to a *real* DBMS.

    The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs.
    The bugs. The bugs.

    What sorts of bugs? Are they still in current versions? Have you reported
    any of them?


    Mainly crashing. I have not tried it in the last year or so.

    I report a ton of bugs on writer and calc, but not on database.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 7 14:45:20 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 2025-06-07 08:22, T wrote:
    On 6/6/25 9:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 20:17:58 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/6/25 7:42 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:13:23 -0700, T wrote:

    I looked at Libre Office database.  It is so buggy,
    it is horrible to the point of being unusable.

    LibreOffice Base has its own built-in DBMS, but it can also act as a
    front-end to things like MySQL/MariaDB and SQLite, among others -- and >>>> either one of those can run rings around Microsoft Access. Think of
    LO:Base just as a GUI front-end tool to a *real* DBMS.

    The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs.
    The bugs. The bugs.

    What sorts of bugs? Are they still in current versions? Have you reported
    any of them?


    Mainly crashing.   I have not tried it in the last year or so.

    Doesn't crash for me.

    I have a small database in MySQL which I currently access using LO.
    Originally designed and used with Rekall.


    I report a ton of bugs on writer and calc, but not on database.


    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to chrisv on Sat Jun 7 08:52:02 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sat, 6/7/2025 8:40 AM, chrisv wrote:
    T wrote:

    One customer I had, does not upgrade any hardware until
    it dies. When their server went down, it really cost and
    hurt them.

    Crazy.


    It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of
    any business.

    Just buy lots of boxes of three-part carbon paper,
    and some pads of quad-rule paper for taking notes,
    and that is enough for the job.

    That's what I liked about my work. On the one hand,
    we could be spending three or four million a year,
    designing cavity-buster silicon chips. And if you
    needed a phone installed at your desk there, the
    order was filled out on three part carbon paper,
    and the employees had robust ancient-looking desks
    with "inbox" tray and "outbox" tray for the three
    part carbon (one copy of your order goes there).

    And if you phoned up and asked "where is that telephone
    installation I asked for a month ago", you would hear
    "ruffle-ruffle-ruffle" as the individual would
    "fast index" the pile of paper on its desk :-)
    That was the height of the comedy, the ruffling noise.
    "Wow, that sounds faster than SQLITE".

    We simply could not break the paper habit.

    If an organization was <cough> "forced" to accept
    computerized ordering, what happens then ?

    The twits print off three copies of your order,
    put one copy of fresh clean typing paper in
    "Bobs inbox" and "away we go". Four weeks later,
    "ya gotcha phone, what are ya complaining about now?".

    They would promptly thwart the appearance of computer ordering,
    by immediately printing off three copies.

    So really, when push comes to shove, that old 386
    in the storage room, wasn't doing much of anything
    anyway. Three part carbon, saves the day. The employees
    just love the paper. And a manager walking by,
    knows when to order up another employee, based on
    how tall the stack is in each in-basket.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to T@invalid.invalid on Sat Jun 7 15:50:06 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    T <T@invalid.invalid> wrote at 02:13 this Saturday (GMT):
    On 6/6/25 5:47 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:

    I still use Lotus Approach.

    Hopefully not for anything important.

    I wrote my companies accounting system in it.
    Yes, it is important.

    I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
    it is horrible to the point of being unusable.


    Is it a SQL based database? I've been doing fine for now just using
    sqlite.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 7 17:35:39 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 15:50:06 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:

    T <T@invalid.invalid> wrote at 02:13 this Saturday (GMT):
    On 6/6/25 5:47 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:

    I still use Lotus Approach.

    Hopefully not for anything important.

    I wrote my companies accounting system in it.
    Yes, it is important.

    I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
    it is horrible to the point of being unusable.


    Is it a SQL based database? I've been doing fine for now just using
    sqlite.

    Strange, while both the Fedora and Ubuntu boxes have LibreOffice as part
    of the default install neither have LibreOffice Base. It requires

    sudo apt update
    sudo apt install libreoffice-base

    Must be good!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to rbowman on Sat Jun 7 15:15:16 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sat, 6/7/2025 1:35 PM, rbowman wrote:
    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 15:50:06 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:

    T <T@invalid.invalid> wrote at 02:13 this Saturday (GMT):
    On 6/6/25 5:47 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:

    I still use Lotus Approach.

    Hopefully not for anything important.

    I wrote my companies accounting system in it.
    Yes, it is important.

    I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
    it is horrible to the point of being unusable.


    Is it a SQL based database? I've been doing fine for now just using
    sqlite.

    Strange, while both the Fedora and Ubuntu boxes have LibreOffice as part
    of the default install neither have LibreOffice Base. It requires

    sudo apt update
    sudo apt install libreoffice-base

    Must be good!


    When you have Suite softwares, a certain set of them are considered
    to be the "Core" modules, others can be optional. What you're seeing
    isn't unusual. It's like someone getting a copy of MSOffice and
    noticing that Visio isn't installed. Well, who would want that
    anyway :-) We for some reason, had Visio at work, but my imagination
    was not ignited by its presence. I'd rather have a copy of SuperPaint
    (which combined elements of vector and pixmap graphics, back
    in the day). I used to draw a lot of stick diagrams, and SuperPaint
    was great for that, even if the handling of gridding left a bit
    to be desired.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to Paul on Sun Jun 8 00:08:32 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 15:15:16 -0400, Paul wrote:


    When you have Suite softwares, a certain set of them are considered to
    be the "Core" modules, others can be optional. What you're seeing isn't unusual. It's like someone getting a copy of MSOffice and noticing that
    Visio isn't installed. Well, who would want that

    They could have left off Calc, Math, Impress, Draw and Writer as far as
    I'm concerned. It seemed odd Base was the odd man out,.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Paul on Sun Jun 8 00:33:08 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 15:15:16 -0400, Paul wrote:

    I'd rather have a copy of SuperPaint (which combined elements of
    vector and pixmap graphics, back in the day).

    I remember that as a Macintosh program. Did you run it on the Mac? Though
    there was a competitor, available under two names: “GraphicWorks” and “ComicWorks”, which was more flexible than SuperPaint because the pixmap blocks were objects within the vector drawing, rather than being a
    separate layer. The “ComicWorks” branding was an attempt to highlight that feature as being particularly useful to artists creating comics.

    There’s nothing directly like that now, but it’s easy enough to use a separate pixel tool (any or all of Gimp, Krita, MyPaint ...) and then embed/link the pixel graphics into Inkscape as objects within the vector drawing. Linking has the added advantage that updates to the original will
    be reflected in the composite document.

    Kind of like GraphicWorks/ComicWorks ...

    We for some reason, had Visio at work, but my imagination was not
    ignited by its presence.

    I think Inkscape can do everything that Visio can/could do, as well.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Paul on Sun Jun 8 00:27:00 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:52:02 -0400, Paul wrote:

    It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of any business.

    You think a business like Google or Facebook could run without computers?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Sat Jun 7 22:54:51 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sat, 6/7/2025 8:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:52:02 -0400, Paul wrote:

    It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of any business.

    You think a business like Google or Facebook could run without computers?


    I bet in Facebook, if you needed a phone for your desk,
    there are three sheets of carbon paper controlling the
    deployment of equipment and staff.

    That is just the way those people roll. They love the
    feel of paper, and the taller the stack of orders,
    the more important you are.

    We used to joke about this, because some of our projects
    would have a "paperless office" angle to them. Then the
    twit with the phone would show up, holding carbon paper
    in hand, and "ruin the illusion".

    We were huge consumers of paper. The main printer in my
    department went through 2000 sheets per day. Four packs
    of paper. The tray was motorized and the motor lifted
    2000 sheets of paper, up against the intake roller. The printers
    we had back then, were excellent. There's a lot of small
    printers today, you wouldn't dream of running 60,000
    sheets per month through them.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Sat Jun 7 19:55:13 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/7/25 5:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:52:02 -0400, Paul wrote:

    It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of any business.

    You think a business like Google or Facebook could run without computers?

    I think you missed his sarcasm.

    I read one a consultant would take paper calendars
    and rolodexs into meetings with customers and offer
    to show them how to use them. It shut up the
    flim-flam con man remarks pretty quick.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Sat Jun 7 19:58:20 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/7/25 5:45 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    Mainly crashing.   I have not tried it in the last year or so.

    Doesn't crash for me.

    I have a small database in MySQL which I currently access using LO. Originally designed and used with Rekall.

    If you can get t to work without crashing, me thinks
    it is time for me to revisit it. Thank you!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Paul on Sun Jun 8 03:55:37 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:54:51 -0400, Paul wrote:

    On Sat, 6/7/2025 8:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:52:02 -0400, Paul wrote:

    It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of any business.

    You think a business like Google or Facebook could run without
    computers?

    I bet in Facebook, if you needed a phone for your desk,
    there are three sheets of carbon paper controlling the
    deployment of equipment and staff.

    You would lose that bet.

    Remember, an early motto at the company was “move fast and break things”.

    You think they even have phones on their desks? Why would they need them?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 8 03:55:58 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 19:55:13 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/7/25 5:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:52:02 -0400, Paul wrote:

    It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of any business.

    You think a business like Google or Facebook could run without
    computers?

    I think you missed his sarcasm.

    Apparently not, judging from his followup post.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Sun Jun 8 04:00:55 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 14:45:20 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    I have a small database in MySQL which I currently access using LO.

    I was going to say, why “small” with “MySQL”, and then I remember that, at
    one time. KDE would run an entire personal instance of MySQL on every
    logged-in GUI session, presumably for contacts databases and stuff like
    that.

    So, to those who automatically assume that MySQL/MariaDB is only suitable
    for “heavyweight” uses ... beware of being misled by traditional proprietary-software marketing categories!

    Originally designed and used with Rekall.

    Ah <https://store.kde.org/p/1126366>, now that seems to be purely a GUI front-end tool, with no built-in DBMS of its own. Do you find LibreOffice
    Base to be a better choice in that category?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Sat Jun 7 21:43:21 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 6/7/25 8:55 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 19:55:13 -0700, T wrote:

    On 6/7/25 5:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:52:02 -0400, Paul wrote:

    It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of any business.

    You think a business like Google or Facebook could run without
    computers?

    I think you missed his sarcasm.

    Apparently not, judging from his followup post.


    He could not resist!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Sun Jun 8 07:05:59 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 03:55:37 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    You think they even have phones on their desks? Why would they need
    them?

    When the company went to a new phone system they forgot to provide
    programming with phones. We cried ourselves to sleep.

    I personally hate phones and I particularly dislike speaking to customer support people who obviously can speak their primary language much better
    than English. Email works much better.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Sun Jun 8 06:58:36 2025
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 04:00:55 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    Ah <https://store.kde.org/p/1126366>, now that seems to be purely a GUI front-end tool, with no built-in DBMS of its own. Do you find
    LibreOffice Base to be a better choice in that category?

    And the last change log was 21 years ago. It didn't sound too good then.

    For poking around I use DBeaver.

    https://dbeaver.io/about/

    It supports any database I use as well as a lot I've never heard of.

    Cross-platform, with setup.exe, deb, rpm, snap, or flatpak.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)