“Your computer is toast
“Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
turn it into junk.
“It may seem like it continues to work after that date for a bit, but when Microsoft stops support for Windows 10, your perfectly good computer will
be officially obsolete.
“Windows 10 will degrade as more and more bugs come to light. With nobody to correct them, you risk being hacked. Your data, identity, and control
over your device could be stolen.
“New versions of your apps will not run, but Microsoft will still block
you from upgrading to the next version of Windows until you buy the new computer they decide.”
Scary? Yes. Exaggerated? No. Because that’s what Microsoft really wants to do. Just like it has done so many times before.
<https://kde.org/for/w10-exiles/>
On Wed, 6/4/2025 8:41 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
“Your computer is toastWas that a picture of one of the KDE staffers computer room ?
“Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
turn it into junk.
“It may seem like it continues to work after that date for a bit, but
when Microsoft stops support for Windows 10, your perfectly good
computer will be officially obsolete.
“Windows 10 will degrade as more and more bugs come to light. With
nobody to correct them, you risk being hacked. Your data, identity, and
control over your device could be stolen.
“New versions of your apps will not run, but Microsoft will still block
you from upgrading to the next version of Windows until you buy the new
computer they decide.”
Scary? Yes. Exaggerated? No. Because that’s what Microsoft really wants
to do. Just like it has done so many times before.
<https://kde.org/for/w10-exiles/>
Maybe that's their build server ? :-)
Seriously, I scanned the page and I don't see an action plan.
How exactly will the software climb onto the PC ?
That's what is missing from the Year Of The Linux Desktop,
is the Concierge service.
Remember, your average user is not a C.S.
graduate, and with the sorry state of Google searches these days, even
the best-prepared website is never going to show up in a search.
How do I put the ISO on the USB stick ?
Some of the people,
just a few, will remember trying one USB stick tool after another,
and ending up with nothing to show for their trouble. And those are the people who will be offering advice.
A few of the users, will try to download the ISO onto a FAT32 partition
for temporary storage. Say, a 6GB Ubuntu DVD.
And you know what happens when you do that. I've done that *several*
times by accident. Today, there are no more FAT32 partitions in the
active computer room. When the WinXP machine died, the interest in FAT32
went with it.
I looked at gstatcounter today, and I saw some strange patterns in
there. What's weird about the patterns, is there are real world
events... and the patterns in gstatcounter are delayed by two or three months. Nothing seems to "align immediately" exactly. It's my suspicion,
that Microsoft is winning by playing this game. But it's a natural
outcome. The path of least resistance is being followed. I've already
heard one USENETter say the fateful words,
"maybe I should buy a Win11 machine". Not many would have the balls to
admit something like that. Normally that sort of thing happens silently.
That's why I'm telling you that Concierge service is the only campaign
that will work. Unless a loaded USB stick shows up in a mailer on each
users doorstep, it's not gonna happen.
Google has an offering for the Chrome Book OS, and the offering is a bit
more friendly than the competition. Unfortunately, their GUI is not very expressive. When the installer boots, it should just say "um, we don't install on desktops, hey, try your laptop".
Instead, the interface just freezes... as a status code. When I booted
my laptop with that installer USB, I finally made it past the first
screen. But had no intention of installing it on my laptop.
If it's one thing I know about helping users, it takes *forever*
to get one of them tipped upright. It's like herding turtles.
How this is a recipe for the Year Of The Linux Desktop,
escapes me. The above web page isn't helping.
If you were serious about your campaign, you'd send 100 serialized USB
sticks to each Public Library. Then, on the KDE web page,
when everything is staged, you'd have the users sign out the stick at
the library, and bring it back later. Or, be charged a nominal fee
(similar to a late book charge). Libraries do not enjoy being dragged
into every crazy assed scheme, but they were the point of contact here
for FreeNet. You could fill out a FreeNet sheet, show your drivers
license to attest to the details, and the sheet was then forwarded to FreeNet.
There isn't really a FreeNet here any more, but that's how they got some people hooked up on an "hour a week" dialup plan.
The local FreeNet modem front end was donated by a high tech company.
Pressed DVDs would be cheaper, but the instant response in the audience
would be "hey, I don't got a DVD drive". That's why I can't utter magic
words like that.
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 21:17:15 -0400, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote in
How do I put the ISO on the USB stick ?
Beats me. How do you do it for Windows?
Seriously, I scanned the page and I don't see an action plan.
How exactly will the software climb onto the PC ?
W dniu 5.06.2025 o 03:17, Paul pisze:
Seriously, I scanned the page and I don't see an action plan.
How exactly will the software climb onto the PC ?
This is totally unfair!!! KDE advertise Plasma, not distro. Distros are listed under URL linked in article:
<https://kde.org/distributions/>
And I try first of them:
<https://fedoraproject.org/kde/>
At the bottom of the page is button: "Download Now", it jump us to the:
https://fedoraproject.org/kde/download
And bellow this page we have... surprise!
quote:"Fedora Media Writer
“Your computer is toast
“Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
turn it into junk.
“It may seem like it continues to work after that date for a bit, but when >Microsoft stops support for Windows 10, your perfectly good computer will
be officially obsolete.
“Windows 10 will degrade as more and more bugs come to light. With nobody >to correct them, you risk being hacked. Your data, identity, and control
over your device could be stolen.
“New versions of your apps will not run, but Microsoft will still block
you from upgrading to the next version of Windows until you buy the new >computer they decide.”
Scary? Yes. Exaggerated? No. Because that’s what Microsoft really wants to >do. Just like it has done so many times before.
W dniu 5.06.2025 o 03:17, Paul pisze:you are hooked, transferring Fedora Linux from the flash drive to your computer's hard drive is a matter of clicking a few buttons.* Learn more"
Seriously, I scanned the page and I don't see an action plan.
How exactly will the software climb onto the PC ?
This is totally unfair!!! KDE advertise Plasma, not distro. Distros are listed under URL linked in article:
<https://kde.org/distributions/>
And I try first of them:
<https://fedoraproject.org/kde/>
At the bottom of the page is button: "Download Now", it jump us to the:
https://fedoraproject.org/kde/download
And bellow this page we have... surprise!
quote:"Fedora Media Writer
Getting started with Fedora Linux is easier than ever. All you need is a 4GB USB flash drive and the Fedora Media Writer utility.
After Fedora Media Writer is installed, you can use it to write a "Live" version of Fedora Linux to a flash drive. You will then be able to boot from your flash drive and try Fedora Linux out without making any permanent changes to your computer. Once
So your nag that people don't know what to do with USB stick and ISO files are BS and evil propaganda!
“It may seem like it continues to work after that date for a bit, but when Microsoft stops support for Windows 10, your perfectly good computer will
be officially obsolete.
There should be a law that says that when any commercial software firm
ceases to support software, it should immediately be put in the public
domain and made open source.
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:26:59 -0700, T wrote:
Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking. Not minor like W10 to
W11.
The problem is that transitioning to Dimdows 11, for those who haven’t already done it, will mean junking their existing hardware and buying new machines. Linux offers the option to keep their existing hardware working, often even better than before.
Wow.
Okay, I am a Linux shop and a YUGE advocate of Fedora Linux.
I have to say though, the hype over W10 ending is really
overblown. W11 is essentially W10 with an even stupider
interface. Install Open Shell on it and you won't be able
to tell the difference, unless you deliberately go looking
for it. All your programs should still work. With Open
Shell installed, there is really very little new to learn.
Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking. Not
minor like W10 to W11.
My 2 cents.
Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking. Not minor like W10 to
W11.
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:26:59 -0700, T wrote:
Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking. Not minor like W10 to
W11.
The problem is that transitioning to Dimdows 11, for those who haven’t already done it, will mean junking their existing hardware and buying new machines. Linux offers the option to keep their existing hardware working, often even better than before.
And there a ton of ways around W11's ridiculous hardware requirements
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:52:12 -0700, T wrote:
And there a ton of ways around W11's ridiculous hardware requirements
This is why they say, Windows is a great OS -- if your time is worth
nothing.
“Your computer is toast
“Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
turn it into junk.
“It may seem like it continues to work after that date for a bit, but when Microsoft stops support for Windows 10, your perfectly good computer will
be officially obsolete.
“Windows 10 will degrade as more and more bugs come to light. With nobody to correct them, you risk being hacked. Your data, identity, and control
over your device could be stolen.
“New versions of your apps will not run, but Microsoft will still block
you from upgrading to the next version of Windows until you buy the new computer they decide.”
Scary? Yes. Exaggerated? No. Because that’s what Microsoft really wants to do. Just like it has done so many times before.
<https://kde.org/for/w10-exiles/>
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:06:50 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote:
There should be a law that says that when any commercial software firm
ceases to support software, it should immediately be put in the public
domain and made open source.
You really think Government intervention can make things better?
I will say one thing: I once contacted Microsoft Support about getting
a download link for Access. (I was going to try to run it on proton, on Linux.) They were courteous and helpful. If someone started a service
like that for Linux, they'd be sitting on a goldmine.
"But what about MS Office?" someone may ask: For the most part,
Office 365 works on Linux. (Alas, Access doesn't. That's the only
reason I haven't moved my parents to Linux.)
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:29:29 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2025-06-05 04:44, vallor wrote:
"But what about MS Office?" someone may ask: For the most part, Office
365 works on Linux. (Alas, Access doesn't. That's the only reason I
haven't moved my parents to Linux.)
Funny. Few people use Access :-)
The ones that do have built their interfaces around Access and are locked
to it forever.
On 6/4/25 11:43 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:26:59 -0700, T wrote:
Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking. Not minor like W10 to
W11.
The problem is that transitioning to Dimdows 11, for those who haven’t
already done it, will mean junking their existing hardware and buying new
machines. Linux offers the option to keep their existing hardware
working,
often even better than before.
There are tons of ways around having to junk your
old, functional computer to run W11. Rufus comes
to mind.
On 2025-06-05 04:44, vallor wrote:
"But what about MS Office?" someone may ask: For the most part, Office
365 works on Linux. (Alas, Access doesn't. That's the only reason I
haven't moved my parents to Linux.)
Funny. Few people use Access :-)
On 2025-06-05 08:56, T wrote:
On 6/4/25 11:43 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:26:59 -0700, T wrote:
Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking. Not minor like W10 to
W11.
The problem is that transitioning to Dimdows 11, for those who haven’t >>> already done it, will mean junking their existing hardware and buying new >>> machines. Linux offers the option to keep their existing hardware working, >>> often even better than before.
There are tons of ways around having to junk your
old, functional computer to run W11. Rufus comes
to mind.
Most of the methods I have seen involve a fresh install of W11 instead of an upgrade of W10→11
“Your computer is toast
“Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
turn it into junk.
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:29:29 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:
The ones that do have built their interfaces around Access and are
locked to it forever.
Yes, that is so.
Windows 10 will continue to run just fine.
Windows 10 will have a longer life than XP did.
Unfortunately, if the programs you need to run are only written for
Windows, you are stuck with it. 99% of everyone is stuck with it.
You can run Windows programs in Linux with the Wine application layer,
but Wine is alpha stage code at best.
When M$ see your system does not have the requirements to run its stupid spyware, it just wont install it. Yippee!
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 02:28:43 -0700, T wrote:
Unfortunately, if the programs you need to run are only written for
Windows, you are stuck with it. 99% of everyone is stuck with it.
Actually, the proportion is a bit less nowadays. Free Software tends to be invisible in the marketplace because money isn’t changing hands.
You can run Windows programs in Linux with the Wine application layer,
but Wine is alpha stage code at best.
It seems to be good enough to run the majority of Windows-specific games
on the Steam Deck. That product has created a whole new market category, handheld PC gaming, where the Windows-based competitors are really
struggling to gain a foothold.
And, you have to admit, games are among the most difficult things to run properly under an emulator.
A prime example of this is LibreOffice, which I do use myself. LO has to
be, not similar, but "EXACTLY" the same as M$ Office or they blow a
cork.
Oh and they wont pay for the upgrade to the new version of M$ Office.
Wine is actually an application layer. They get their nickers in a
twist if you call it an emulator.
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:06:50 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote:
There should be a law that says that when any commercial software firm
ceases to support software, it should immediately be put in the public
domain and made open source.
You really think Government intervention can make things better?
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 17:36:42 -0700, T wrote:
A prime example of this is LibreOffice, which I do use myself. LO has to
be, not similar, but "EXACTLY" the same as M$ Office or they blow a
cork.
Interesting, because Microsoft Office is notorious for formatting inconsistencies just from moving documents between different machines. If they will put up with that, why should they complain about LibreOffice,
which does a better job anyway?
Oh and they wont pay for the upgrade to the new version of M$ Office.
But they will pay for Adobe’s products??
Wine is actually an application layer. They get their nickers in a
twist if you call it an emulator.
Try looking up “emulator” in the dictionary?
Wine is no more “not an emulator” than GNU is “not Unix”.
On 6/5/25 6:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
But they will pay for Adobe’s products??
Once and nothing after that
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 21:46:02 -0700, T wrote:
On 6/5/25 6:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
But they will pay for Adobe’s products??
Once and nothing after that
But all Adobe’s stuff is rentware now. Stop paying and you lose control of your own work.
These customers have older revisions. And often times they are on the
latest OS and are pissed that their old stuff stopped working properly.
Windows 10 will continue to get AV updates.
Tyrone wrote:
Windows 10 will continue to get AV updates.
If you pay extra for that extended support, right?
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 23:08:28 -0700, T wrote:
These customers have older revisions. And often times they are on the
latest OS and are pissed that their old stuff stopped working properly.
Would you entrust mission-critical business operations to obsolete, unsupported software?
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 23:26:59 -0700, T wrote:
Transitioning to Linux is a YUGE undertaking. Not minor like W10 to
W11.
The problem is that transitioning to Dimdows 11, for those who haven’t
already done it, will mean junking their existing hardware and buying new
machines. Linux offers the option to keep their existing hardware working, >> often even better than before.
Amen, but it should be noted, Linux is better than Windows on Win11-
capable machines, too.
On 6/5/25 4:31 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
I do use GNU Cash. It is has a bloody difficult learning curve,
but once you get there, it is a wonderful tool. I can't see
any of my customer abandoning QuickBooks (a Linux killer) for it.
Too much "new" to learn.
You can run Windows programs in Linux with the Wine application layer,
but Wine is alpha stage code at best.
It seems to be good enough to run the majority of Windows-specific games
on the Steam Deck. That product has created a whole new market category,
handheld PC gaming, where the Windows-based competitors are really
struggling to gain a foothold.
And, you have to admit, games are among the most difficult things to run
properly under an emulator.
Wine is actually an application layer. They get their nickers
in a twist if you call it an emulator. Chuckle.
On Jun 4, 2025 at 8:41:09 PM EDT, "Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
“Your computer is toast
No it isn't.
“Running Windows 10 on your computer? On October 14 Microsoft wants to
turn it into junk.
No they don't. This is all nonsense.
Windows 10 will continue to run just fine. Windows 10 will continue to get AV updates. I am still getting Windows Defender updates to Windows 8.1.
Windows 10 will have a longer life than XP did.
On 6/06/2025 1:08 am, Joel wrote:
In a related, but different, line ..... does Apple regularly Dead End/ Obsolete their Macs or is a (say) 2020 Mac still capable of running the latest Mac OS??
A 2015 Mac??
A 2010 Mac??
T, what would be the possibility of setting your customers up to use
Linux .... and then, for those 'special' programs (like QuickBooks)
giving your customers a desktop icon called 'QuickBooks' which actually
boots Wine and opens 'QuickBooks'??
Sure, it could end up with several copies of Wine running, each
operating different Windows programs but it would be "DO"able, wouldn't
it??
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 19:52:43 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:29:29 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:
The ones that do have built their interfaces around Access and are
locked to it forever.
Yes, that is so.
Well, either they consider their IT a strategic competitive asset, or they don’t. If they do, then betting their business on inflexible software that is incapable of adapting to modern needs is going to rebound on them
sooner or later.
On 2025-06-05 04:44, vallor wrote:
"But what about MS Office?" someone may ask: For the most part,
Office 365 works on Linux. (Alas, Access doesn't. That's the only
reason I haven't moved my parents to Linux.)
Funny. Few people use Access :-)
On 6/6/25 3:11 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/06/2025 1:08 am, Joel wrote:
In a related, but different, line ..... does Apple regularly Dead End/
Obsolete their Macs or is a (say) 2020 Mac still capable of running
the latest Mac OS??
A 2015 Mac??
A 2010 Mac??
Yes they do. Apple is a total pain in the ass about it.
Get new hardware of no new OS.
OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.
The problem is that most businesses do not want to adapt to anything.
They want what they have to continue working. Period.
And you have the "I don't want to learn anything new " crowd.
On 6/06/2025 9:04 pm, T wrote:
On 6/6/25 3:11 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/06/2025 1:08 am, Joel wrote:
In a related, but different, line ..... does Apple regularly Dead End/
Obsolete their Macs or is a (say) 2020 Mac still capable of running
the latest Mac OS??
A 2015 Mac??
A 2010 Mac??
Yes they do. Apple is a total pain in the ass about it.
Get new hardware of no new OS.
OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.
Thanks for reply, T.
Can't say I've heard any rumbling from them ..... maybe because they are only, what, 15 - 20% of the Computing World.
Or is it just that I don't 'frequent' those places??
On 6/06/2025 10:36 am, T wrote:
On 6/5/25 4:31 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
<Snip>
I do use GNU Cash. It is has a bloody difficult learning curve,T, what would be the possibility of setting your customers up to use Linux .... and then, for those 'special' programs (like QuickBooks) giving your customers a desktop icon called 'QuickBooks' which actually boots Wine and opens 'QuickBooks'??
but once you get there, it is a wonderful tool. I can't see
any of my customer abandoning QuickBooks (a Linux killer) for it.
Too much "new" to learn.
You can run Windows programs in Linux with the Wine application layer, >>>> but Wine is alpha stage code at best.
It seems to be good enough to run the majority of Windows-specific games >>> on the Steam Deck. That product has created a whole new market category, >>> handheld PC gaming, where the Windows-based competitors are really
struggling to gain a foothold.
And, you have to admit, games are among the most difficult things to run >>> properly under an emulator.
Wine is actually an application layer. They get their nickers
in a twist if you call it an emulator. Chuckle.
Sure, it could end up with several copies of Wine running, each operating different Windows programs but it would be "DO"able, wouldn't it??
On 6/06/2025 9:04 pm, T wrote:
On 6/6/25 3:11 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/06/2025 1:08 am, Joel wrote:
In a related, but different, line ..... does Apple regularly Dead End/ Obsolete their Macs or is a (say) 2020 Mac still capable of running the latest Mac OS??
A 2015 Mac??
A 2010 Mac??
Yes they do. Apple is a total pain in the ass about it.
Get new hardware of no new OS.
OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.
Thanks for reply, T.
Can't say I've heard any rumbling from them ..... maybe because they are only, what, 15 - 20% of the Computing World.
Or is it just that I don't 'frequent' those places??
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:14:28 -0700, T wrote:
The problem is that most businesses do not want to adapt to anything.
They want what they have to continue working. Period.
And you have the "I don't want to learn anything new " crowd.
We had a users group with a yearly meeting. The users would submit
requests for enhancements that we would do if they were feasible.
Invariably when the new release was rolled out there were the 'What is
this? It didn't use to work like that!'.
Then there was an actual bug that I fixed that allowed unsupported
behavior. One site had exploited the bug and were upset when they could no longer attach the same resource to several different incidents.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 22:11:41 +1000, Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/06/2025 9:04 pm, T wrote:
On 6/6/25 3:11 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/06/2025 1:08 am, Joel wrote:
In a related, but different, line ..... does Apple regularly Dead End/ >>>> Obsolete their Macs or is a (say) 2020 Mac still capable of running
the latest Mac OS??
A 2015 Mac??
A 2010 Mac??
Yes they do. Apple is a total pain in the ass about it.
Get new hardware of no new OS.
OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.
Thanks for reply, T.
Can't say I've heard any rumbling from them ..... maybe because they are
only, what, 15 - 20% of the Computing World.
Or is it just that I don't 'frequent' those places??
I don't know if Apple customers are insanely happy with the products or if the moderators are iron fisted but on r/apple there seldom is heard a discouraging word.
On 6/5/25 4:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Well, either they consider their IT a strategic competitive asset, or
they don’t. If they do, then betting their business on inflexible
software that is incapable of adapting to modern needs is going to
rebound on them sooner or later.
The problem is that most businesses do not want to adapt to anything.
They want what they have to continue working. Period.
And you have the "I don't want to learn anything new " crowd.
On 6/6/25 12:30 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 23:08:28 -0700, T wrote:
These customers have older revisions. And often times they are on the
latest OS and are pissed that their old stuff stopped working
properly.
Would you entrust mission-critical business operations to obsolete,
unsupported software?
Yes and no. If the obsolete software runs your mission-critical
perfectly, then yes. Freeze everything.
This is the objective behind Red Had Enterprise Linux. Freeze old
versions of Fedora. Bugs and all.
I also do Payment Card Industry (PCI) consulting.
You are required to have a "supported" operating system. And
Point-of-Sale software is foolishly (I cleaned up the swear word)
written on Windows.
So every M$ update is a very stressful experience, not to mention the
down time they take.
I still use Lotus Approach.
OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 01:18:26 -0700, T wrote:
On 6/6/25 12:30 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 23:08:28 -0700, T wrote:
These customers have older revisions. And often times they are on the >>>> latest OS and are pissed that their old stuff stopped working
properly.
Would you entrust mission-critical business operations to obsolete,
unsupported software?
Yes and no. If the obsolete software runs your mission-critical
perfectly, then yes. Freeze everything.
Wrong answer. The answer is no.
This is the objective behind Red Had Enterprise Linux. Freeze old
versions of Fedora. Bugs and all.
That’s not how it works. They do fix bugs in RHEL, you know, for as long
as the old version is supported. That’s what’s meant by “supported”.
I also do Payment Card Industry (PCI) consulting.
You are required to have a "supported" operating system. And
Point-of-Sale software is foolishly (I cleaned up the swear word)
written on Windows.
So every M$ update is a very stressful experience, not to mention the
down time they take.
Seems like there is an opportunity for a competitor to bring out a non- Windows-based alternative that offers lower support costs.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:04:46 -0700, T wrote:
OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.
It’s officially “Unix”, but it doesn’t quite work the way people expect
when they think of “Unix”.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:14:28 -0700, T wrote:
On 6/5/25 4:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Well, either they consider their IT a strategic competitive asset, or
they don’t. If they do, then betting their business on inflexible
software that is incapable of adapting to modern needs is going to
rebound on them sooner or later.
The problem is that most businesses do not want to adapt to anything.
They want what they have to continue working. Period.
That’s fine. So they get out-competed by somebody who pays more attention to IT being a strategic competitive asset, and go out of business. No need
to feel any sympathy for them.
And you have the "I don't want to learn anything new " crowd.
For a business that persists in employing such people, see above.
On 6/6/25 5:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:04:46 -0700, T wrote:
OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.
It’s officially “Unix”, but it doesn’t quite work the way people expect
when they think of “Unix”.
The grouches on OSx forums get testy with you if you call it Unix. They demand you call it POSIX. It is still Unix.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:
I still use Lotus Approach.
Hopefully not for anything important.
On 6/6/25 5:47 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:
I still use Lotus Approach.
Hopefully not for anything important.
I wrote my companies accounting system in it.
Yes, it is important.
I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
it is horrible to the point of being unusable.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:00:19 -0700, T wrote:
On 6/6/25 5:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:04:46 -0700, T wrote:
OSx is to damned weird to use anyway.
It’s officially “Unix”, but it doesn’t quite work the way people expect
when they think of “Unix”.
The grouches on OSx forums get testy with you if you call it Unix. They
demand you call it POSIX. It is still Unix.
Calling it “POSIX” doesn’t really help <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOeku3hDzrM>.
This is why a lot of people say “*nix”. It dodges the trademark, even
as the name “Unix” still occurs in some of the details. For example,
the “Unix philosophy” is a core part of this. E.g. the system should
be a bunch of toolkits that implement only mechanism, without imposing
a particular policy: let the users/admins/developers implement
whatever policies they want with the help of those toolkits.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:13:23 -0700, T wrote:
On 6/6/25 5:47 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:
I still use Lotus Approach.
Hopefully not for anything important.
I wrote my companies accounting system in it.
Yes, it is important.
I used to use FileMaker Pro on a Macintosh, for two main business-related systems that I had developed myself: my time-and-billing system, and
cheque reconciliation.
When I went to Linux, I wrote Python programs for doing both tasks: the
first on top of MySQL/MariaDB, the latter on top of SQLite.
For an example of the difference, my cheque reconciliation database
involved running AppleScript code to match up the stub entries and the statement entries. The Linux/Python version would finish the entire task
in the time it took for the Mac/AppleScript version to find the first
record.
I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
it is horrible to the point of being unusable.
LibreOffice Base has its own built-in DBMS, but it can also act as a front-end to things like MySQL/MariaDB and SQLite, among others -- and
either one of those can run rings around Microsoft Access. Think of
LO:Base just as a GUI front-end tool to a *real* DBMS.
On 6/6/25 7:42 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:13:23 -0700, T wrote:
I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
it is horrible to the point of being unusable.
LibreOffice Base has its own built-in DBMS, but it can also act as a
front-end to things like MySQL/MariaDB and SQLite, among others -- and
either one of those can run rings around Microsoft Access. Think of
LO:Base just as a GUI front-end tool to a *real* DBMS.
The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs.
The bugs. The bugs.
On 6/6/25 7:13 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
For example, the “Unix philosophy” is a core part of this. E.g. the
system should be a bunch of toolkits that implement only mechanism,
without imposing a particular policy: let the
users/admins/developers implement whatever policies they want with
the help of those toolkits.
That explains it! Thank you.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 20:17:58 -0700, T wrote:
On 6/6/25 7:42 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:13:23 -0700, T wrote:
I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
it is horrible to the point of being unusable.
LibreOffice Base has its own built-in DBMS, but it can also act as a
front-end to things like MySQL/MariaDB and SQLite, among others -- and
either one of those can run rings around Microsoft Access. Think of
LO:Base just as a GUI front-end tool to a *real* DBMS.
The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs.
The bugs. The bugs.
What sorts of bugs? Are they still in current versions? Have you reported
any of them?
On 6/6/25 9:50 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 20:17:58 -0700, T wrote:
On 6/6/25 7:42 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 19:13:23 -0700, T wrote:
I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
it is horrible to the point of being unusable.
LibreOffice Base has its own built-in DBMS, but it can also act as a
front-end to things like MySQL/MariaDB and SQLite, among others -- and >>>> either one of those can run rings around Microsoft Access. Think of
LO:Base just as a GUI front-end tool to a *real* DBMS.
The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs. The bugs.
The bugs. The bugs.
What sorts of bugs? Are they still in current versions? Have you reported
any of them?
Mainly crashing. I have not tried it in the last year or so.
I report a ton of bugs on writer and calc, but not on database.
T wrote:
One customer I had, does not upgrade any hardware until
it dies. When their server went down, it really cost and
hurt them.
Crazy.
On 6/6/25 5:47 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:
I still use Lotus Approach.
Hopefully not for anything important.
I wrote my companies accounting system in it.
Yes, it is important.
I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
it is horrible to the point of being unusable.
T <T@invalid.invalid> wrote at 02:13 this Saturday (GMT):
On 6/6/25 5:47 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:
I still use Lotus Approach.
Hopefully not for anything important.
I wrote my companies accounting system in it.
Yes, it is important.
I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
it is horrible to the point of being unusable.
Is it a SQL based database? I've been doing fine for now just using
sqlite.
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 15:50:06 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
T <T@invalid.invalid> wrote at 02:13 this Saturday (GMT):
On 6/6/25 5:47 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:15:20 -0700, T wrote:
I still use Lotus Approach.
Hopefully not for anything important.
I wrote my companies accounting system in it.
Yes, it is important.
I looked at Libre Office database. It is so buggy,
it is horrible to the point of being unusable.
Is it a SQL based database? I've been doing fine for now just using
sqlite.
Strange, while both the Fedora and Ubuntu boxes have LibreOffice as part
of the default install neither have LibreOffice Base. It requires
sudo apt update
sudo apt install libreoffice-base
Must be good!
When you have Suite softwares, a certain set of them are considered to
be the "Core" modules, others can be optional. What you're seeing isn't unusual. It's like someone getting a copy of MSOffice and noticing that
Visio isn't installed. Well, who would want that
I'd rather have a copy of SuperPaint (which combined elements of
vector and pixmap graphics, back in the day).
We for some reason, had Visio at work, but my imagination was not
ignited by its presence.
It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of any business.
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:52:02 -0400, Paul wrote:
It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of any business.
You think a business like Google or Facebook could run without computers?
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:52:02 -0400, Paul wrote:
It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of any business.
You think a business like Google or Facebook could run without computers?
Mainly crashing. I have not tried it in the last year or so.
Doesn't crash for me.
I have a small database in MySQL which I currently access using LO. Originally designed and used with Rekall.
On Sat, 6/7/2025 8:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
I bet in Facebook, if you needed a phone for your desk,
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:52:02 -0400, Paul wrote:
It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of any business.
You think a business like Google or Facebook could run without
computers?
there are three sheets of carbon paper controlling the
deployment of equipment and staff.
On 6/7/25 5:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:52:02 -0400, Paul wrote:
It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of any business.
You think a business like Google or Facebook could run without
computers?
I think you missed his sarcasm.
I have a small database in MySQL which I currently access using LO.
Originally designed and used with Rekall.
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 19:55:13 -0700, T wrote:
On 6/7/25 5:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 08:52:02 -0400, Paul wrote:
It's been proven, that computers are an optional part of any business.
You think a business like Google or Facebook could run without
computers?
I think you missed his sarcasm.
Apparently not, judging from his followup post.
You think they even have phones on their desks? Why would they need
them?
Ah <https://store.kde.org/p/1126366>, now that seems to be purely a GUI front-end tool, with no built-in DBMS of its own. Do you find
LibreOffice Base to be a better choice in that category?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 508 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 223:59:29 |
Calls: | 9,976 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 13,833 |
Messages: | 6,359,114 |