• Once more

    From Tony@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 14 23:36:52 2024
    XPost: nz.politics

    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our ridiculously expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or Auckland. https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Gordon on Sun Sep 15 04:06:23 2024
    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our ridiculously >> expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or Auckland. >> https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. Just >imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to half
    their value. Whew!
    Yes that is persuasvie, Luxon was correct in telling them to fix their game. They will push back however, just like the idiots in the Wellingon council are but they are incompetent.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Tony on Sun Sep 15 03:22:37 2024
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our ridiculously expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or Auckland. https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. Just imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to half
    their value. Whew!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Sun Sep 15 20:41:09 2024
    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:06:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our ridiculously >>> expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or Auckland.
    https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. Just >>imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to half >>their value. Whew!
    Yes that is persuasvie, Luxon was correct in telling them to fix their game. >They will push back however, just like the idiots in the Wellingon council are >but they are incompetent.

    My personal view is that the NZTU needs to remain focused on taxpayer,
    rather than ratepayer interests. It also needs to remain focused on nationwide, rather than local, issues. I understand that the NZTU has
    a 'sister 'organisation' in Auckland and IMHO they would be wise to
    lave local body issues to similar local organisations.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 15 21:54:54 2024
    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 20:41:09 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:06:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our ridiculously
    expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or Auckland.
    https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. Just >>>imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to half >>>their value. Whew!

    They are going up because the Atlas network wants to top tax rate to
    go down. The conservative (National) candidates for local authorities
    claimed that keeping rates low showed good management - now central
    government has increased rates by passing a lot of costs that were
    previously largely met by government to local authorities - and is
    blaming their own people for keeping rates low . . .

    Yes that is persuasvie, Luxon was correct in telling them to fix their game. >>They will push back however, just like the idiots in the Wellingon council are
    but they are incompetent.

    Wellington rates are increasing by less than some other Councils -
    and we are also finding out that the then National government didn't
    do a particularly good job in Christchurch . . .

    My personal view is that the NZTU needs to remain focused on taxpayer,
    rather than ratepayer interests. It also needs to remain focused on >nationwide, rather than local, issues. I understand that the NZTU has
    a 'sister 'organisation' in Auckland and IMHO they would be wise to
    lave local body issues to similar local organisations.

    That depends on what you think the NZ Taxpayers Union is trying to
    achieve - they represent less government, whether at local, regional
    or national level. Other organisations after the same thing are the
    NZ Initiative and NZ Centre for Political Research - which was the one
    you had in mind, Crash?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Sun Sep 15 19:41:51 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 20:41:09 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:06:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our >>>>>ridiculously
    expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or >>>>>Auckland.
    https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. Just >>>>imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to half >>>>their value. Whew!

    They are going up because the Atlas network wants to top tax rate to
    go down. The conservative (National) candidates for local authorities
    claimed that keeping rates low showed good management - now central >government has increased rates by passing a lot of costs that were
    previously largely met by government to local authorities - and is
    blaming their own people for keeping rates low . . .

    Yes that is persuasvie, Luxon was correct in telling them to fix their game. >>>They will push back however, just like the idiots in the Wellingon council >>>are
    but they are incompetent.

    Wellington rates are increasing by less than some other Councils -
    and we are also finding out that the then National government didn't
    do a particularly good job in Christchurch . . .

    My personal view is that the NZTU needs to remain focused on taxpayer, >>rather than ratepayer interests. It also needs to remain focused on >>nationwide, rather than local, issues. I understand that the NZTU has
    a 'sister 'organisation' in Auckland and IMHO they would be wise to
    lave local body issues to similar local organisations.

    That depends on what you think the NZ Taxpayers Union is trying to
    achieve - they represent less government, whether at local, regional
    or national level. Other organisations after the same thing are the
    NZ Initiative and NZ Centre for Political Research - which was the one
    you had in mind, Crash?
    Geez what an idiotic piece of prose, you certainly managed to confuse yourself there.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 16 11:18:20 2024
    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:54:54 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 20:41:09 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:06:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our ridiculously
    expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or Auckland.
    https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. Just >>>>imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to half >>>>their value. Whew!

    They are going up because the Atlas network wants to top tax rate to
    go down. The conservative (National) candidates for local authorities
    claimed that keeping rates low showed good management - now central >government has increased rates by passing a lot of costs that were
    previously largely met by government to local authorities - and is
    blaming their own people for keeping rates low . . .

    Yes that is persuasvie, Luxon was correct in telling them to fix their game. >>>They will push back however, just like the idiots in the Wellingon council are
    but they are incompetent.

    Wellington rates are increasing by less than some other Councils -
    and we are also finding out that the then National government didn't
    do a particularly good job in Christchurch . . .

    My personal view is that the NZTU needs to remain focused on taxpayer, >>rather than ratepayer interests. It also needs to remain focused on >>nationwide, rather than local, issues. I understand that the NZTU has
    a 'sister 'organisation' in Auckland and IMHO they would be wise to
    lave local body issues to similar local organisations.

    That depends on what you think the NZ Taxpayers Union is trying to
    achieve - they represent less government, whether at local, regional
    or national level. Other organisations after the same thing are the
    NZ Initiative and NZ Centre for Political Research - which was the one
    you had in mind, Crash?

    What is it that leads you to believe I had any existing organisation?
    I am simply advocating that the NZTU stay focused on central
    government issues.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 16 12:47:39 2024
    On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:18:20 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:54:54 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 20:41:09 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:06:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our ridiculously
    expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or Auckland.
    https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. Just >>>>>imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to half >>>>>their value. Whew!

    They are going up because the Atlas network wants to top tax rate to
    go down. The conservative (National) candidates for local authorities >>claimed that keeping rates low showed good management - now central >>government has increased rates by passing a lot of costs that were >>previously largely met by government to local authorities - and is
    blaming their own people for keeping rates low . . .

    Yes that is persuasvie, Luxon was correct in telling them to fix their game.
    They will push back however, just like the idiots in the Wellingon council are
    but they are incompetent.

    Wellington rates are increasing by less than some other Councils -
    and we are also finding out that the then National government didn't
    do a particularly good job in Christchurch . . .

    My personal view is that the NZTU needs to remain focused on taxpayer, >>>rather than ratepayer interests. It also needs to remain focused on >>>nationwide, rather than local, issues. I understand that the NZTU has
    a 'sister 'organisation' in Auckland and IMHO they would be wise to
    lave local body issues to similar local organisations.

    That depends on what you think the NZ Taxpayers Union is trying to
    achieve - they represent less government, whether at local, regional
    or national level. Other organisations after the same thing are the
    NZ Initiative and NZ Centre for Political Research - which was the one
    you had in mind, Crash?

    What is it that leads you to believe I had any existing organisation?
    I am simply advocating that the NZTU stay focused on central
    government issues.
    They are. They are supportive of the move by the ACT-led government to
    push costs from central to local government - away from income tax.
    Rates are tax-deductible for landlords, and increases in rents to
    cover the balance lead to increases in value. What is not to like from
    a "business perspective"?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Sep 16 05:08:14 2024
    On 2024-09-16, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:18:20 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:54:54 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 20:41:09 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:06:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our ridiculously
    expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or Auckland.
    https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. Just
    imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to half >>>>>>their value. Whew!

    They are going up because the Atlas network wants to top tax rate to
    go down. The conservative (National) candidates for local authorities >>>claimed that keeping rates low showed good management - now central >>>government has increased rates by passing a lot of costs that were >>>previously largely met by government to local authorities - and is >>>blaming their own people for keeping rates low . . .

    Yes that is persuasvie, Luxon was correct in telling them to fix their game.
    They will push back however, just like the idiots in the Wellingon council are
    but they are incompetent.

    Wellington rates are increasing by less than some other Councils -
    and we are also finding out that the then National government didn't
    do a particularly good job in Christchurch . . .

    My personal view is that the NZTU needs to remain focused on taxpayer, >>>>rather than ratepayer interests. It also needs to remain focused on >>>>nationwide, rather than local, issues. I understand that the NZTU has >>>>a 'sister 'organisation' in Auckland and IMHO they would be wise to >>>>lave local body issues to similar local organisations.

    That depends on what you think the NZ Taxpayers Union is trying to >>>achieve - they represent less government, whether at local, regional
    or national level. Other organisations after the same thing are the
    NZ Initiative and NZ Centre for Political Research - which was the one >>>you had in mind, Crash?

    What is it that leads you to believe I had any existing organisation?
    I am simply advocating that the NZTU stay focused on central
    government issues.
    They are. They are supportive of the move by the ACT-led government to
    push costs from central to local government - away from income tax.
    Rates are tax-deductible for landlords, and increases in rents to
    cover the balance lead to increases in value. What is not to like from
    a "business perspective"?

    Thought experiement, the Government makes sure that the private landlords
    are not able to be paid for the work/service they provide, rooves over
    peoples heads. There will be a great/huge shortage of housing, rentals will
    be sky high. However the Landlords will be punished.

    All good. This is what the new Left does.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Gordon on Mon Sep 16 05:12:36 2024
    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-16, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:18:20 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:54:54 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 20:41:09 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:06:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our >>>>>>>>ridiculously
    expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or >>>>>>>>Auckland.
    https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. >>>>>>>Just
    imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to half >>>>>>>their value. Whew!

    They are going up because the Atlas network wants to top tax rate to
    go down. The conservative (National) candidates for local authorities >>>>claimed that keeping rates low showed good management - now central >>>>government has increased rates by passing a lot of costs that were >>>>previously largely met by government to local authorities - and is >>>>blaming their own people for keeping rates low . . .

    Yes that is persuasvie, Luxon was correct in telling them to fix their >>>>>>game.
    They will push back however, just like the idiots in the Wellingon >>>>>>council are
    but they are incompetent.

    Wellington rates are increasing by less than some other Councils -
    and we are also finding out that the then National government didn't
    do a particularly good job in Christchurch . . .

    My personal view is that the NZTU needs to remain focused on taxpayer, >>>>>rather than ratepayer interests. It also needs to remain focused on >>>>>nationwide, rather than local, issues. I understand that the NZTU has >>>>>a 'sister 'organisation' in Auckland and IMHO they would be wise to >>>>>lave local body issues to similar local organisations.

    That depends on what you think the NZ Taxpayers Union is trying to >>>>achieve - they represent less government, whether at local, regional
    or national level. Other organisations after the same thing are the
    NZ Initiative and NZ Centre for Political Research - which was the one >>>>you had in mind, Crash?

    What is it that leads you to believe I had any existing organisation?
    I am simply advocating that the NZTU stay focused on central
    government issues.
    They are. They are supportive of the move by the ACT-led government to
    push costs from central to local government - away from income tax.
    Rates are tax-deductible for landlords, and increases in rents to
    cover the balance lead to increases in value. What is not to like from
    a "business perspective"?

    Thought experiement, the Government makes sure that the private landlords
    are not able to be paid for the work/service they provide, rooves over >peoples heads. There will be a great/huge shortage of housing, rentals will >be sky high. However the Landlords will be punished.

    All good. This is what the new Left does.
    I have never understood why people like Rich hate landlords, they provide an essential service and are entitled to a fair profit for doing so. But political rhetoric twists some people.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to Gordon on Mon Sep 16 20:10:04 2024
    On 16 Sep 2024 05:08:14 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-09-16, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:18:20 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:54:54 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 20:41:09 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:06:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our ridiculously
    expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or Auckland.
    https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. Just
    imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to half >>>>>>>their value. Whew!

    They are going up because the Atlas network wants to top tax rate to
    go down. The conservative (National) candidates for local authorities >>>>claimed that keeping rates low showed good management - now central >>>>government has increased rates by passing a lot of costs that were >>>>previously largely met by government to local authorities - and is >>>>blaming their own people for keeping rates low . . .

    Yes that is persuasvie, Luxon was correct in telling them to fix their game.
    They will push back however, just like the idiots in the Wellingon council are
    but they are incompetent.

    Wellington rates are increasing by less than some other Councils -
    and we are also finding out that the then National government didn't
    do a particularly good job in Christchurch . . .

    My personal view is that the NZTU needs to remain focused on taxpayer, >>>>>rather than ratepayer interests. It also needs to remain focused on >>>>>nationwide, rather than local, issues. I understand that the NZTU has >>>>>a 'sister 'organisation' in Auckland and IMHO they would be wise to >>>>>lave local body issues to similar local organisations.

    That depends on what you think the NZ Taxpayers Union is trying to >>>>achieve - they represent less government, whether at local, regional
    or national level. Other organisations after the same thing are the
    NZ Initiative and NZ Centre for Political Research - which was the one >>>>you had in mind, Crash?

    What is it that leads you to believe I had any existing organisation?
    I am simply advocating that the NZTU stay focused on central
    government issues.
    They are. They are supportive of the move by the ACT-led government to
    push costs from central to local government - away from income tax.
    Rates are tax-deductible for landlords, and increases in rents to
    cover the balance lead to increases in value. What is not to like from
    a "business perspective"?

    Thought experiement, the Government makes sure that the private landlords
    are not able to be paid for the work/service they provide, rooves over >peoples heads. There will be a great/huge shortage of housing, rentals will >be sky high. However the Landlords will be punished.

    All good. This is what the new Left does.

    Of course they do not - landlords have always been able to cover costs
    by increasing rents - which increases income and hence capital value.
    The impact on private owners is different - the change from
    progressive income tax to a greater level of rates will for those on
    lower incomes make it harder to meet costs, as wages will not be
    automatically increased to meet the costs of house ownership.

    Private rentals are good to have as an option for home owners - the
    problem comes from so favouring that ownership that markets are
    distorted. It is similar to the lack of competition between banks,
    and between electricity providers, that leads to higher prices at the
    expense of efficient market allocation of resources. It is what has
    led to being a landlord becoming a better investment than owning
    shares - so we sell our companies off to overseas owners - and also to
    our having very high electricity prices and to our banks generating
    high profits - lack of competition is not good for the country.
    For housing, the best mix appears to be provision by the State for
    those on the lowest incomes - but unfortunately National and Act are
    not looking for efficient market mechanisms - they want the wealthy to
    become wealthier, and long term that makes us all poorer than with
    truly competitive markets . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Sep 16 19:52:25 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 16 Sep 2024 05:08:14 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-09-16, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:18:20 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:54:54 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 20:41:09 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:06:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our >>>>>>>>>ridiculously
    expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or >>>>>>>>>Auckland.
    https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. >>>>>>>>Just
    imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to half >>>>>>>>their value. Whew!

    They are going up because the Atlas network wants to top tax rate to >>>>>go down. The conservative (National) candidates for local authorities >>>>>claimed that keeping rates low showed good management - now central >>>>>government has increased rates by passing a lot of costs that were >>>>>previously largely met by government to local authorities - and is >>>>>blaming their own people for keeping rates low . . .

    Yes that is persuasvie, Luxon was correct in telling them to fix their >>>>>>>game.
    They will push back however, just like the idiots in the Wellingon >>>>>>>council are
    but they are incompetent.

    Wellington rates are increasing by less than some other Councils - >>>>>and we are also finding out that the then National government didn't >>>>>do a particularly good job in Christchurch . . .

    My personal view is that the NZTU needs to remain focused on taxpayer, >>>>>>rather than ratepayer interests. It also needs to remain focused on >>>>>>nationwide, rather than local, issues. I understand that the NZTU has >>>>>>a 'sister 'organisation' in Auckland and IMHO they would be wise to >>>>>>lave local body issues to similar local organisations.

    That depends on what you think the NZ Taxpayers Union is trying to >>>>>achieve - they represent less government, whether at local, regional >>>>>or national level. Other organisations after the same thing are the >>>>>NZ Initiative and NZ Centre for Political Research - which was the one >>>>>you had in mind, Crash?

    What is it that leads you to believe I had any existing organisation?
    I am simply advocating that the NZTU stay focused on central
    government issues.
    They are. They are supportive of the move by the ACT-led government to
    push costs from central to local government - away from income tax.
    Rates are tax-deductible for landlords, and increases in rents to
    cover the balance lead to increases in value. What is not to like from
    a "business perspective"?

    Thought experiement, the Government makes sure that the private landlords >>are not able to be paid for the work/service they provide, rooves over >>peoples heads. There will be a great/huge shortage of housing, rentals will >>be sky high. However the Landlords will be punished.

    All good. This is what the new Left does.

    Of course they do not - landlords have always been able to cover costs
    by increasing rents - which increases income and hence capital value.
    The impact on private owners is different - the change from
    progressive income tax to a greater level of rates will for those on
    lower incomes make it harder to meet costs, as wages will not be >automatically increased to meet the costs of house ownership.

    Private rentals are good to have as an option for home owners - the
    problem comes from so favouring that ownership that markets are
    distorted. It is similar to the lack of competition between banks,
    and between electricity providers, that leads to higher prices at the
    expense of efficient market allocation of resources. It is what has
    led to being a landlord becoming a better investment than owning
    shares - so we sell our companies off to overseas owners - and also to
    our having very high electricity prices and to our banks generating
    high profits - lack of competition is not good for the country.
    For housing, the best mix appears to be provision by the State for
    those on the lowest incomes - but unfortunately National and Act are
    not looking for efficient market mechanisms - they want the wealthy to
    become wealthier, and long term that makes us all poorer than with
    truly competitive markets . . .
    Straight out of the Marxist handbook. Totally inappropriate for a democratic country.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Tue Sep 17 08:10:34 2024
    On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:52:25 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 16 Sep 2024 05:08:14 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-09-16, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:18:20 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:54:54 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 20:41:09 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>>>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:06:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our >>>>>>>>>>ridiculously
    expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or >>>>>>>>>>Auckland.
    https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. >>>>>>>>>Just
    imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to half
    their value. Whew!

    They are going up because the Atlas network wants to top tax rate to >>>>>>go down. The conservative (National) candidates for local authorities >>>>>>claimed that keeping rates low showed good management - now central >>>>>>government has increased rates by passing a lot of costs that were >>>>>>previously largely met by government to local authorities - and is >>>>>>blaming their own people for keeping rates low . . .

    Yes that is persuasvie, Luxon was correct in telling them to fix their >>>>>>>>game.
    They will push back however, just like the idiots in the Wellingon >>>>>>>>council are
    but they are incompetent.

    Wellington rates are increasing by less than some other Councils - >>>>>>and we are also finding out that the then National government didn't >>>>>>do a particularly good job in Christchurch . . .

    My personal view is that the NZTU needs to remain focused on taxpayer, >>>>>>>rather than ratepayer interests. It also needs to remain focused on >>>>>>>nationwide, rather than local, issues. I understand that the NZTU has >>>>>>>a 'sister 'organisation' in Auckland and IMHO they would be wise to >>>>>>>lave local body issues to similar local organisations.

    That depends on what you think the NZ Taxpayers Union is trying to >>>>>>achieve - they represent less government, whether at local, regional >>>>>>or national level. Other organisations after the same thing are the >>>>>>NZ Initiative and NZ Centre for Political Research - which was the one >>>>>>you had in mind, Crash?

    What is it that leads you to believe I had any existing organisation? >>>>>I am simply advocating that the NZTU stay focused on central >>>>>government issues.
    They are. They are supportive of the move by the ACT-led government to >>>> push costs from central to local government - away from income tax.
    Rates are tax-deductible for landlords, and increases in rents to
    cover the balance lead to increases in value. What is not to like from >>>> a "business perspective"?

    Thought experiement, the Government makes sure that the private landlords >>>are not able to be paid for the work/service they provide, rooves over >>>peoples heads. There will be a great/huge shortage of housing, rentals will >>>be sky high. However the Landlords will be punished.

    All good. This is what the new Left does.

    Of course they do not - landlords have always been able to cover costs
    by increasing rents - which increases income and hence capital value.
    The impact on private owners is different - the change from
    progressive income tax to a greater level of rates will for those on
    lower incomes make it harder to meet costs, as wages will not be >>automatically increased to meet the costs of house ownership.

    Private rentals are good to have as an option for home owners - the
    problem comes from so favouring that ownership that markets are
    distorted. It is similar to the lack of competition between banks,
    and between electricity providers, that leads to higher prices at the >>expense of efficient market allocation of resources. It is what has
    led to being a landlord becoming a better investment than owning
    shares - so we sell our companies off to overseas owners - and also to
    our having very high electricity prices and to our banks generating
    high profits - lack of competition is not good for the country.
    For housing, the best mix appears to be provision by the State for
    those on the lowest incomes - but unfortunately National and Act are
    not looking for efficient market mechanisms - they want the wealthy to >>become wealthier, and long term that makes us all poorer than with
    truly competitive markets . . .
    Straight out of the Marxist handbook. Totally inappropriate for a democratic >country.
    Trust you to so categorise a fair and free market!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Sep 17 01:51:30 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:52:25 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 16 Sep 2024 05:08:14 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-09-16, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:18:20 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>> wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:54:54 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 20:41:09 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>>>>wrote:

    On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:06:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    On 2024-09-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    The Taxpayers' Union shows how to be non-partisan and hold our >>>>>>>>>>>ridiculously
    expensive councils to account. Glad I don't live in Wellington or >>>>>>>>>>>Auckland.
    https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/20240907_newsletter

    One thing for sure transparency is still mess in action.

    Interesting figure about the NZ rates almost twice the world average. >>>>>>>>>>Just
    imagine standing on a ticket for election to get the rates down to >>>>>>>>>>half
    their value. Whew!

    They are going up because the Atlas network wants to top tax rate to >>>>>>>go down. The conservative (National) candidates for local authorities >>>>>>>claimed that keeping rates low showed good management - now central >>>>>>>government has increased rates by passing a lot of costs that were >>>>>>>previously largely met by government to local authorities - and is >>>>>>>blaming their own people for keeping rates low . . .

    Yes that is persuasvie, Luxon was correct in telling them to fix their >>>>>>>>>game.
    They will push back however, just like the idiots in the Wellingon >>>>>>>>>council are
    but they are incompetent.

    Wellington rates are increasing by less than some other Councils - >>>>>>>and we are also finding out that the then National government didn't >>>>>>>do a particularly good job in Christchurch . . .

    My personal view is that the NZTU needs to remain focused on taxpayer, >>>>>>>>rather than ratepayer interests. It also needs to remain focused on >>>>>>>>nationwide, rather than local, issues. I understand that the NZTU has >>>>>>>>a 'sister 'organisation' in Auckland and IMHO they would be wise to >>>>>>>>lave local body issues to similar local organisations.

    That depends on what you think the NZ Taxpayers Union is trying to >>>>>>>achieve - they represent less government, whether at local, regional >>>>>>>or national level. Other organisations after the same thing are the >>>>>>>NZ Initiative and NZ Centre for Political Research - which was the one >>>>>>>you had in mind, Crash?

    What is it that leads you to believe I had any existing organisation? >>>>>>I am simply advocating that the NZTU stay focused on central >>>>>>government issues.
    They are. They are supportive of the move by the ACT-led government to >>>>> push costs from central to local government - away from income tax.
    Rates are tax-deductible for landlords, and increases in rents to
    cover the balance lead to increases in value. What is not to like from >>>>> a "business perspective"?

    Thought experiement, the Government makes sure that the private landlords >>>>are not able to be paid for the work/service they provide, rooves over >>>>peoples heads. There will be a great/huge shortage of housing, rentals will >>>>be sky high. However the Landlords will be punished.

    All good. This is what the new Left does.

    Of course they do not - landlords have always been able to cover costs
    by increasing rents - which increases income and hence capital value.
    The impact on private owners is different - the change from
    progressive income tax to a greater level of rates will for those on >>>lower incomes make it harder to meet costs, as wages will not be >>>automatically increased to meet the costs of house ownership.

    Private rentals are good to have as an option for home owners - the >>>problem comes from so favouring that ownership that markets are >>>distorted. It is similar to the lack of competition between banks,
    and between electricity providers, that leads to higher prices at the >>>expense of efficient market allocation of resources. It is what has
    led to being a landlord becoming a better investment than owning
    shares - so we sell our companies off to overseas owners - and also to >>>our having very high electricity prices and to our banks generating
    high profits - lack of competition is not good for the country.
    For housing, the best mix appears to be provision by the State for
    those on the lowest incomes - but unfortunately National and Act are
    not looking for efficient market mechanisms - they want the wealthy to >>>become wealthier, and long term that makes us all poorer than with
    truly competitive markets . . .
    Straight out of the Marxist handbook. Totally inappropriate for a democratic >>country.
    Trust you to so categorise a fair and free market!
    Youir stupidity precedes you, I was of course referring to you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)