Toyota's new SS claims are a battery with 238 kWh storage capacity
that can be recharged in 10 min.
I'll let you do the math on amps vs volts of that charger.
They can't keep the Tesla fast chargers up. But one of these
suckers is either going to require a copper line you probably can't
pick up due to it's weight or run at a voltage that could ionize
air.
Needless to say...every charging station in existence is totally
obsolete and the only thing they won't have to replace might be the asphalt.....unless asphalt is flammable with a 1000 amps at 10kV
running through it.
On 11/24/23 6:22 PM, ScottW wrote:
Toyota's new SS claims are a battery with 238 kWh storage capacity
that can be recharged in 10 min.
I'll let you do the math on amps vs volts of that charger.Maybe solid state batteries will have less resistance.
They can't keep the Tesla fast chargers up. But one of theseLooks like you didn't read an original press release. This is a little
suckers is either going to require a copper line you probably can't
pick up due to it's weight or run at a voltage that could ionize
air.
Needless to say...every charging station in existence is totally
obsolete and the only thing they won't have to replace might be the asphalt.....unless asphalt is flammable with a 1000 amps at 10kV
running through it.
short of technical details, but it might help you separate Toyota's
future goals from their short-term implementations:
https://global.toyota/en/newsroom/corporate/39330500.html
Next gen: "We are aiming for a 20% increase in cruising range, a 40% reduction in cost, and quick recharging in 30 minutes or less
(SOC=10-80%) compared to the current bZ4X and considering installing it
in BEVs in the popular price range."
Down the road (2027-28): "We are looking at a 20% improvement in
cruising range*1 compared to the performance version of the square
battery shown in 1., while costs are under scrutiny, aiming for a quick charge time of 10 minutes or less (SOC=10-80%)."
You'll need to show how this means using present-day rechargers.
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 7:33:07 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 11/24/23 6:22 PM, ScottW wrote:
Toyota's new SS claims are a battery with 238 kWh storage capacityMaybe solid state batteries will have less resistance.
that can be recharged in 10 min.
I'll let you do the math on amps vs volts of that charger.
That would be "lost" power.
That isn't even taken into account in filling the storage capacity.
Did you ever take a single basic electronics class?
Here's all you need.
V(volts) x I (amps) = Power (watts)
They can't keep the Tesla fast chargers up. But one of theseLooks like you didn't read an original press release. This is a little
suckers is either going to require a copper line you probably can't
pick up due to it's weight or run at a voltage that could ionize
air.
Needless to say...every charging station in existence is totally
obsolete and the only thing they won't have to replace might be the
asphalt.....unless asphalt is flammable with a 1000 amps at 10kV
running through it.
short of technical details, but it might help you separate Toyota's
future goals from their short-term implementations:
https://global.toyota/en/newsroom/corporate/39330500.html
Zero mention of what all these goals require from charging infrastructure
to implement. Not one mention.
Why do you suppose that is? Is that a "not my problem" hint?
Perhaps they've decided the gov't has to deal with that end of this transition
or perhaps they simply have no solution.
Developing and designing the cars is probably the easiest part of this transition of transportation to electric vehicles.
Next gen: "We are aiming for a 20% increase in cruising range, a 40%
reduction in cost, and quick recharging in 30 minutes or less
(SOC=10-80%) compared to the current bZ4X and considering installing it
in BEVs in the popular price range."
Down the road (2027-28): "We are looking at a 20% improvement in
cruising range*1 compared to the performance version of the square
battery shown in 1., while costs are under scrutiny, aiming for a quick
charge time of 10 minutes or less (SOC=10-80%)."
You'll need to show how this means using present-day rechargers.
I'll have to? LoL. Why? So you can live in a dream world?
On 11/25/23 10:30 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 7:33:07 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 11/24/23 6:22 PM, ScottW wrote:
Toyota's new SS claims are a battery with 238 kWh storage capacityMaybe solid state batteries will have less resistance.
that can be recharged in 10 min.
I'll let you do the math on amps vs volts of that charger.
That would be "lost" power.If no power is lost, how does the asphalt melt?
That isn't even taken into account in filling the storage capacity.
Did you ever take a single basic electronics class?How much music theory did you take?
Here's all you need.I'm guessing the real math for recharging is more complicated than that.
V(volts) x I (amps) = Power (watts)
Meanwhile, in the real world:
https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a40929408/ev-charging-chart-rates/
The Kia Genesis can fully recharge in 32 minutes while the Lucid Air can
add a hundred-mile amount of charge in eight minutes.
They can't keep the Tesla fast chargers up. But one of theseLooks like you didn't read an original press release. This is a little
suckers is either going to require a copper line you probably can't
pick up due to it's weight or run at a voltage that could ionize
air.
Needless to say...every charging station in existence is totally
obsolete and the only thing they won't have to replace might be the
asphalt.....unless asphalt is flammable with a 1000 amps at 10kV
running through it.
short of technical details, but it might help you separate Toyota's
future goals from their short-term implementations:
https://global.toyota/en/newsroom/corporate/39330500.html
Zero mention of what all these goals require from charging infrastructure to implement. Not one mention.
Why do you suppose that is? Is that a "not my problem" hint?
Perhaps they've decided the gov't has to deal with that end of this transition
or perhaps they simply have no solution.
Developing and designing the cars is probably the easiest part of this transition of transportation to electric vehicles.https://www.forbes.com/sites/lauriewinkless/2023/11/14/could-solid-state-batteries-supercharge-electric-vehicles/?sh=7c5fa646592c
Looks like EVs and plants both crave electrolytes.
Next gen: "We are aiming for a 20% increase in cruising range, a 40%
reduction in cost, and quick recharging in 30 minutes or less
(SOC=10-80%) compared to the current bZ4X and considering installing it >> in BEVs in the popular price range."
Down the road (2027-28): "We are looking at a 20% improvement in
cruising range*1 compared to the performance version of the square
battery shown in 1., while costs are under scrutiny, aiming for a quick >> charge time of 10 minutes or less (SOC=10-80%)."
You'll need to show how this means using present-day rechargers.
I'll have to? LoL. Why? So you can live in a dream world?No, so we'll know what you're talking about. If it's so obvious fast
charge times require superconduction or risk melting asphalt, you'd
think there'd be some mention of that somewhere.
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 11:30:57 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 11/25/23 10:30 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 7:33:07 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:If no power is lost, how does the asphalt melt?
On 11/24/23 6:22 PM, ScottW wrote:
Toyota's new SS claims are a battery with 238 kWh storage capacityMaybe solid state batteries will have less resistance.
that can be recharged in 10 min.
I'll let you do the math on amps vs volts of that charger.
That would be "lost" power.
That isn't even taken into account in filling the storage capacity.
You're desperately obfuscating again.
Did you ever take a single basic electronics class?How much music theory did you take?
Are we discussing music theory or are you still obfuscating?
Here's all you need.I'm guessing the real math for recharging is more complicated than that.
V(volts) x I (amps) = Power (watts)
It is...and the results will be even more daunting to implementation.
Meanwhile, in the real world:
https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a40929408/ev-charging-chart-rates/
The Kia Genesis can fully recharge in 32 minutes while the Lucid Air can
add a hundred-mile amount of charge in eight minutes.
Oh boy....Thanks for proving an e-car is probably ok (if the grid can ever handle it)
for the average needs of a daily commuter.
So why is every e-car designer chasing the holy grail of SS battery ranges?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lauriewinkless/2023/11/14/could-solid-state-batteries-supercharge-electric-vehicles/?sh=7c5fa646592cThey can't keep the Tesla fast chargers up. But one of theseLooks like you didn't read an original press release. This is a little >>>> short of technical details, but it might help you separate Toyota's
suckers is either going to require a copper line you probably can't
pick up due to it's weight or run at a voltage that could ionize
air.
Needless to say...every charging station in existence is totally
obsolete and the only thing they won't have to replace might be the
asphalt.....unless asphalt is flammable with a 1000 amps at 10kV
running through it.
future goals from their short-term implementations:
https://global.toyota/en/newsroom/corporate/39330500.html
Zero mention of what all these goals require from charging infrastructure >>> to implement. Not one mention.
Why do you suppose that is? Is that a "not my problem" hint?
Perhaps they've decided the gov't has to deal with that end of this transition
or perhaps they simply have no solution.
Developing and designing the cars is probably the easiest part of this
transition of transportation to electric vehicles.
Looks like EVs and plants both crave electrolytes.
More irrelevant random e-car article for piano teachers.
No, so we'll know what you're talking about. If it's so obvious fastNext gen: "We are aiming for a 20% increase in cruising range, a 40%
reduction in cost, and quick recharging in 30 minutes or less
(SOC=10-80%) compared to the current bZ4X and considering installing it >>>> in BEVs in the popular price range."
Down the road (2027-28): "We are looking at a 20% improvement in
cruising range*1 compared to the performance version of the square
battery shown in 1., while costs are under scrutiny, aiming for a quick >>>> charge time of 10 minutes or less (SOC=10-80%)."
You'll need to show how this means using present-day rechargers.
I'll have to? LoL. Why? So you can live in a dream world?
charge times require superconduction or risk melting asphalt, you'd
think there'd be some mention of that somewhere.
I gave you the simple math and still you can't wrap your pea brain around it.
How many amps at how many volts are required
to transfer 238 kWh of energy in 10 minutes?
If you can't comprehend this simple question....you have no business ever discussing the viability
of e-cars replacing fossil fuels ever again.
On 11/28/23 11:13 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 11:30:57 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 11/25/23 10:30 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 7:33:07 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote: >>>> On 11/24/23 6:22 PM, ScottW wrote:If no power is lost, how does the asphalt melt?
Toyota's new SS claims are a battery with 238 kWh storage capacity >>>>> that can be recharged in 10 min.Maybe solid state batteries will have less resistance.
I'll let you do the math on amps vs volts of that charger.
That would be "lost" power.
That isn't even taken into account in filling the storage capacity.
You're desperately obfuscating again.It's a direct response to your claim.
Did you ever take a single basic electronics class?How much music theory did you take?
Are we discussing music theory or are you still obfuscating?It speaks to the validity of your question.
Here's all you need.I'm guessing the real math for recharging is more complicated than that.
V(volts) x I (amps) = Power (watts)
It is...and the results will be even more daunting to implementation.What do you know that Toyota doesn't?
Meanwhile, in the real world:
https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a40929408/ev-charging-chart-rates/ >>
The Kia Genesis can fully recharge in 32 minutes while the Lucid Air can >> add a hundred-mile amount of charge in eight minutes.
Oh boy....Thanks for proving an e-car is probably ok (if the grid can ever handle it)The grid can handle it.
https://advocacy.consumerreports.org/research/blog-can-the-grid-handle-evs-yes/
"[I]f EVs accounted for 100% of new vehicle sales by 2035, it would take until 2050 for almost all vehicles on the road to be electric
vehicles... On average, meeting this new electricity demand for
passenger EVs will only require about 1% per year growth in electricity production. This is well below the 3.2% average annual growth rate for
the electricity generation over the past 70 years."
For your inevitable quibbling, follow the link.
for the average needs of a daily commuter.Efficiency. Faster charging. Cheaper storage.
So why is every e-car designer chasing the holy grail of SS battery ranges?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lauriewinkless/2023/11/14/could-solid-state-batteries-supercharge-electric-vehicles/?sh=7c5fa646592cThey can't keep the Tesla fast chargers up. But one of theseLooks like you didn't read an original press release. This is a little >>>> short of technical details, but it might help you separate Toyota's >>>> future goals from their short-term implementations:
suckers is either going to require a copper line you probably can't >>>>> pick up due to it's weight or run at a voltage that could ionize
air.
Needless to say...every charging station in existence is totally
obsolete and the only thing they won't have to replace might be the >>>>> asphalt.....unless asphalt is flammable with a 1000 amps at 10kV
running through it.
https://global.toyota/en/newsroom/corporate/39330500.html
Zero mention of what all these goals require from charging infrastructure
to implement. Not one mention.
Why do you suppose that is? Is that a "not my problem" hint?
Perhaps they've decided the gov't has to deal with that end of this transition
or perhaps they simply have no solution.
Developing and designing the cars is probably the easiest part of this >>> transition of transportation to electric vehicles.
Looks like EVs and plants both crave electrolytes.
More irrelevant random e-car article for piano teachers.It's background on the tech in question in order to respond to your
point and yet another cultural reference lost on you.
No, so we'll know what you're talking about. If it's so obvious fastNext gen: "We are aiming for a 20% increase in cruising range, a 40% >>>> reduction in cost, and quick recharging in 30 minutes or less
(SOC=10-80%) compared to the current bZ4X and considering installing it >>>> in BEVs in the popular price range."
Down the road (2027-28): "We are looking at a 20% improvement in
cruising range*1 compared to the performance version of the square
battery shown in 1., while costs are under scrutiny, aiming for a quick >>>> charge time of 10 minutes or less (SOC=10-80%)."
You'll need to show how this means using present-day rechargers.
I'll have to? LoL. Why? So you can live in a dream world?
charge times require superconduction or risk melting asphalt, you'd
think there'd be some mention of that somewhere.
I gave you the simple math and still you can't wrap your pea brain around it.Siri, how much electricity is needed to "ionize air"?
How many amps at how many volts are requiredNonsense. You yourself agreed the question is "more complicated" and
to transfer 238 kWh of energy in 10 minutes?
If you can't comprehend this simple question....you have no business ever discussing the viability
of e-cars replacing fossil fuels ever again.
"even more daunting" than that.
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 9:41:30 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 11/28/23 11:13 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 11:30:57 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 11/25/23 10:30 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 7:33:07 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote: >>>> On 11/24/23 6:22 PM, ScottW wrote:
Toyota's new SS claims are a battery with 238 kWh storage capacity >>>>> that can be recharged in 10 min.Maybe solid state batteries will have less resistance.
I'll let you do the math on amps vs volts of that charger.
That would be "lost" power.If no power is lost, how does the asphalt melt?
That isn't even taken into account in filling the storage capacity.
You're desperately obfuscating again.It's a direct response to your claim.
Did you ever take a single basic electronics class?How much music theory did you take?
Are we discussing music theory or are you still obfuscating?It speaks to the validity of your question.
Here's all you need.I'm guessing the real math for recharging is more complicated than that.
V(volts) x I (amps) = Power (watts)
It is...and the results will be even more daunting to implementation.What do you know that Toyota doesn't?
Meanwhile, in the real world:
https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a40929408/ev-charging-chart-rates/
The Kia Genesis can fully recharge in 32 minutes while the Lucid Air can
add a hundred-mile amount of charge in eight minutes.
Oh boy....Thanks for proving an e-car is probably ok (if the grid can ever handle it)The grid can handle it.
https://advocacy.consumerreports.org/research/blog-can-the-grid-handle-evs-yes/
"[I]f EVs accounted for 100% of new vehicle sales by 2035, it would take until 2050 for almost all vehicles on the road to be electricYou're going to bank on a history of fossil fuel driven energy growth to repeat? Good luck with that.
vehicles... On average, meeting this new electricity demand for
passenger EVs will only require about 1% per year growth in electricity production. This is well below the 3.2% average annual growth rate for
the electricity generation over the past 70 years."
For your inevitable quibbling, follow the link.
for the average needs of a daily commuter.Efficiency. Faster charging. Cheaper storage.
So why is every e-car designer chasing the holy grail of SS battery ranges?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lauriewinkless/2023/11/14/could-solid-state-batteries-supercharge-electric-vehicles/?sh=7c5fa646592cThey can't keep the Tesla fast chargers up. But one of theseLooks like you didn't read an original press release. This is a little
suckers is either going to require a copper line you probably can't >>>>> pick up due to it's weight or run at a voltage that could ionize >>>>> air.
Needless to say...every charging station in existence is totally >>>>> obsolete and the only thing they won't have to replace might be the >>>>> asphalt.....unless asphalt is flammable with a 1000 amps at 10kV >>>>> running through it.
short of technical details, but it might help you separate Toyota's >>>> future goals from their short-term implementations:
https://global.toyota/en/newsroom/corporate/39330500.html
Zero mention of what all these goals require from charging infrastructure
to implement. Not one mention.
Why do you suppose that is? Is that a "not my problem" hint?
Perhaps they've decided the gov't has to deal with that end of this transition
or perhaps they simply have no solution.
Developing and designing the cars is probably the easiest part of this >>> transition of transportation to electric vehicles.
Looks like EVs and plants both crave electrolytes.
More irrelevant random e-car article for piano teachers.It's background on the tech in question in order to respond to your
point and yet another cultural reference lost on you.
No, so we'll know what you're talking about. If it's so obvious fastNext gen: "We are aiming for a 20% increase in cruising range, a 40% >>>> reduction in cost, and quick recharging in 30 minutes or less
(SOC=10-80%) compared to the current bZ4X and considering installing it
in BEVs in the popular price range."
Down the road (2027-28): "We are looking at a 20% improvement in
cruising range*1 compared to the performance version of the square >>>> battery shown in 1., while costs are under scrutiny, aiming for a quick
charge time of 10 minutes or less (SOC=10-80%)."
You'll need to show how this means using present-day rechargers.
I'll have to? LoL. Why? So you can live in a dream world?
charge times require superconduction or risk melting asphalt, you'd
think there'd be some mention of that somewhere.
Siri is smarter than you are.I gave you the simple math and still you can't wrap your pea brain around it.Siri, how much electricity is needed to "ionize air"?
Air Ionization - Science | HowStuffWorks
HowStuffWorks
https://science.howstuffworks.com › ... › Natural Disasters
I let you off the hook to answer a far simpler best case scenario....and you failed.....again.How many amps at how many volts are requiredNonsense. You yourself agreed the question is "more complicated" and
to transfer 238 kWh of energy in 10 minutes?
If you can't comprehend this simple question....you have no business ever discussing the viability
of e-cars replacing fossil fuels ever again.
"even more daunting" than that.
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 10:32:21 PM UTC-6, ScottW wrote:12 GW of dispatchable generating capacity is equivalent to the aggregate demand of nearly 6 million new EVs.
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 9:41:30 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:Look here! Amps, volts, resistance. Where have we heard of those together?
On 11/28/23 11:13 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 11:30:57 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 11/25/23 10:30 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 7:33:07 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote: >>>> On 11/24/23 6:22 PM, ScottW wrote:
Toyota's new SS claims are a battery with 238 kWh storage capacity >>>>> that can be recharged in 10 min.Maybe solid state batteries will have less resistance.
I'll let you do the math on amps vs volts of that charger.
That would be "lost" power.
That isn't even taken into account in filling the storage capacity. >> If no power is lost, how does the asphalt melt?
You're desperately obfuscating again.It's a direct response to your claim.
Did you ever take a single basic electronics class?How much music theory did you take?
Are we discussing music theory or are you still obfuscating?It speaks to the validity of your question.
Here's all you need.I'm guessing the real math for recharging is more complicated than that.
V(volts) x I (amps) = Power (watts)
It is...and the results will be even more daunting to implementation.What do you know that Toyota doesn't?
Meanwhile, in the real world:
https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a40929408/ev-charging-chart-rates/
The Kia Genesis can fully recharge in 32 minutes while the Lucid Air can
add a hundred-mile amount of charge in eight minutes.
Oh boy....Thanks for proving an e-car is probably ok (if the grid can ever handle it)The grid can handle it.
https://advocacy.consumerreports.org/research/blog-can-the-grid-handle-evs-yes/
"[I]f EVs accounted for 100% of new vehicle sales by 2035, it would take until 2050 for almost all vehicles on the road to be electric vehicles... On average, meeting this new electricity demand for passenger EVs will only require about 1% per year growth in electricity production. This is well below the 3.2% average annual growth rate for the electricity generation over the past 70 years."You're going to bank on a history of fossil fuel driven energy growth to repeat? Good luck with that.
If you'd done this, you'd have found:For your inevitable quibbling, follow the link.
https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/articles/summary-report-evs-scale-and-us-electric-power-system-2019
"U.S. electric power system added an average dispatchable generating capacity of 12 GW per year, with years that exceeded 25 GW when including intermittent resources. In an unmanaged charging scenario intentionally chosen as an illustrative worst case,
This accounts to 1 to 3 times the projected EV market growth through 2030 in the high and medium scenarios respectively."
for the average needs of a daily commuter.Efficiency. Faster charging. Cheaper storage.
So why is every e-car designer chasing the holy grail of SS battery ranges?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lauriewinkless/2023/11/14/could-solid-state-batteries-supercharge-electric-vehicles/?sh=7c5fa646592cThey can't keep the Tesla fast chargers up. But one of theseLooks like you didn't read an original press release. This is a little
suckers is either going to require a copper line you probably can't
pick up due to it's weight or run at a voltage that could ionize >>>>> air.
Needless to say...every charging station in existence is totally >>>>> obsolete and the only thing they won't have to replace might be the
asphalt.....unless asphalt is flammable with a 1000 amps at 10kV >>>>> running through it.
short of technical details, but it might help you separate Toyota's >>>> future goals from their short-term implementations:
https://global.toyota/en/newsroom/corporate/39330500.html
Zero mention of what all these goals require from charging infrastructure
to implement. Not one mention.
Why do you suppose that is? Is that a "not my problem" hint?
Perhaps they've decided the gov't has to deal with that end of this transition
or perhaps they simply have no solution.
Developing and designing the cars is probably the easiest part of this
transition of transportation to electric vehicles.
Looks like EVs and plants both crave electrolytes.
More irrelevant random e-car article for piano teachers.It's background on the tech in question in order to respond to your point and yet another cultural reference lost on you.
No, so we'll know what you're talking about. If it's so obvious fast >> charge times require superconduction or risk melting asphalt, you'd >> think there'd be some mention of that somewhere.Next gen: "We are aiming for a 20% increase in cruising range, a 40%I'll have to? LoL. Why? So you can live in a dream world?
reduction in cost, and quick recharging in 30 minutes or less
(SOC=10-80%) compared to the current bZ4X and considering installing it
in BEVs in the popular price range."
Down the road (2027-28): "We are looking at a 20% improvement in >>>> cruising range*1 compared to the performance version of the square >>>> battery shown in 1., while costs are under scrutiny, aiming for a quick
charge time of 10 minutes or less (SOC=10-80%)."
You'll need to show how this means using present-day rechargers. >>>
<snip>Siri is smarter than you are.I gave you the simple math and still you can't wrap your pea brain around it.Siri, how much electricity is needed to "ionize air"?
Air Ionization - Science | HowStuffWorks
HowStuffWorksCongrats! You've proven my point that search engines exist.
https://science.howstuffworks.com › ... › Natural Disasters
https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/ohms-lawI let you off the hook to answer a far simpler best case scenario....and you failed.....again.How many amps at how many volts are requiredNonsense. You yourself agreed the question is "more complicated" and "even more daunting" than that.
to transfer 238 kWh of energy in 10 minutes?
If you can't comprehend this simple question....you have no business ever discussing the viability
of e-cars replacing fossil fuels ever again.
I don't see a time component there.
Gas is $2.50/gallon: how long does it take to refuel?
On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 7:48:09 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 10:32:21 PM UTC-6, ScottW wrote:
Oh boy....Thanks for proving an e-car is probably ok (if theThe grid can handle it.
grid can ever handle it)
https://advocacy.consumerreports.org/research/blog-can-the-grid-handle-evs-yes/
If you'd done this, you'd have found:For your inevitable quibbling, follow the link.
https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/articles/summary-report-evs-scale-and-us-electric-power-system-2019
And we have 290M vehicles on the roads. Last year 13.5 M cars and
light trucks were sold. Joe's record. Of course under Trump in his
first year some 17.5M cars and light trucks were sold. So you can
see how feebel the 6M number really is....and most of that
electricity is already required by current demand.
This accounts to 1 to 3 times the projected EV market growth
through 2030 in the high and medium scenarios respectively."
Lucky the EV market is shit or we'd be rationing electricity.
https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/ohms-lawI let you off the hook to answer a far simpler best caseHow many amps at how many volts are required to transfer 238Nonsense. You yourself agreed the question is "more
kWh of energy in 10 minutes? If you can't comprehend this
simple question....you have no business ever discussing the
viability of e-cars replacing fossil fuels ever again.
complicated" and "even more daunting" than that.
scenario....and you failed.....again.
I don't see a time component there.
What part of 10 minutes is blinding you?
Gas is $2.50/gallon: how long does it take to refuel?
You are so stupid. An insult to every teacher who ever taught you.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 430 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 123:56:02 |
| Calls: | 9,059 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 13,398 |
| Messages: | 6,017,294 |
| Posted today: | 1 |