"buddyLuh" wrote in message news:17040fc09bf19de5$1120$1683757$
4626d873@news.newsgroupdirect.com...
It's not about getting more energy out than you put in, it's about using alternate fuel sources that were never considered fuel sources. Water is
H2O in it's stable form, but when introduced into a vacuum, heated, and
forced through opposing magnetic fields destabilizes the atoms and becomes H+H+O. An example to completely disprove your theory is this:
Take 2 very large pieces of metal, ones that require a lot of force or
energy to lift. Now magnetize them both by aligning their electrons:
dragging a magnet from pole to pole repeatedly. Place one above the other
with like poles facing, one would appear to "float" or repel the other,
WITHOUT using any energy. It's not about energy, its about constant forces. It's the main reason why part of the reactor must face the magnetic north
pole on initial start up.
The bottom line on this thing is that it works, and works well. I've built one, and will build many more. This technology, with more optimism than skepticism, will likely lead to major improvements possibly changing the
face of fossil fuel energy consumption for the rest of mankind.
--
For full context, visit
https://www.polytechforum.com/metalworking/the-geet-fuel-processor-191849-.htm
-------------------------
https://www.aardvark.co.nz/hho.shtml
Force without motion is NOT a power source, no more useful than the force of your butt on your chair.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)