• boat propulsion - miniature computer-controlled steam plant?

    From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 14:07:38 2024
    Hello all

    I must leave this alone - but here's a thought which jumped to me.

    Started on path of learning "embedded electronic devices".
    Typically boards about 50mm square with inputs, outputs and a
    microprocessor - as would be used to control eg. a washing-machine.

    The thought must occur to an "on the spectrum" mind - for a boat -
    eg. auxiliary power for a sailing yacht...
    because you have the sea as a "cold-well temperature" to condense the
    working fluid steam back to water to go back through the cycle:

    an embedded electronic control device would make possible a
    "flash-steam" turbine power unit.

    It could sense temperature at the output of the "helix of tube" boiler
    with a thermocouple, the power draw on the machine, and instruct
    electric pumps for liquid fuel and the water from the condenser.

    (carnot-cycle-eff
    (my-tc2k 800) ;; 1073.15
    (my-tc2k 70) ;; 343.15
    ) ;; 0.6802404137352653

    The potential efficiency of the device is around 68%.

    You would have fuel-flexibility - "diesel", heating oil, etc.

    The drive would have to be electric (?), seeing as the turbine would
    spin at 10's / 100's of thousands of revs-per-minute.

    The thing would hopefully be nearly silent, vibration-free and small.
    You'll be knowing - on a sailing yacht if you have to go over to
    "auxiliary power"
    (the wind is low or you want a heading in the "no go zone" in the
    90degree included angle about the bow 45deg Port to 45deg Starboard)
    the sound and rumble of a diesel engine in the confined small boat is "sub-optimal".

    In general steam turbine ships have smaller machinery, can be
    lighter-built because there isn't the vibration of a "pounding" diesel
    - but up until now have a fuel-consumption penalty compared to a
    marine long-stroke diesel (which exceeds 50% efficiency)
    Thinking eg. container-ships going around the world at 25knots.

    I am taking it that with stainless steel boiler tube and no
    consequence if it "lets go" - you put the "boiler" in a steel tube and
    if it "lets go" the tiny amount of steam in a flash-boiler "shoots"
    over the stern - probably at the water.
    So worked on the idea of 800C at the boiler output.

    To start the thing you'd crank a manual handle which blows air and
    pumps water and fuel-oil in reasonble ratio until the steam-turbine
    spins and generates electricity the auxiliaries can start drawing-on
    under computer-control.

    It is a nice thought that if you want to voyage when the wind isn't
    blowing that voyage is as silent as sailing.

    A "motor-boat" with such device is a nice thought, and an easier start
    as a test rig.

    Any comments?

    This must be obvious.
    Has been done already?

    I must absolutely leave this alone - but I had to ask if this is
    already known.

    Rich Smith

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Wed Mar 6 18:59:16 2024
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:m1a5nbihcl.fsf@void.com...

    ...

    You could start with a low cost Tesla turbine from eBay, it uses
    friction within a stack of simple disks instead of expensive bladed
    rotors. ...
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_turbine

    ...

    Tesla turbine - thanks - couldn't visulise any way with turbine

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Fairbrother@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Wed Mar 6 21:58:50 2024
    On 06/03/2024 14:07, Richard Smith wrote:
    Hello all

    I must leave this alone - but here's a thought which jumped to me.

    Started on path of learning "embedded electronic devices".
    Typically boards about 50mm square with inputs, outputs and a
    microprocessor - as would be used to control eg. a washing-machine.

    The thought must occur to an "on the spectrum" mind - for a boat -
    eg. auxiliary power for a sailing yacht...

    A microprocessor is probably overkill for a boat - you would run it
    mostly at a set speed, when you would want to know hot temperature and pressure, and engine speed, but that's about all.

    If you are driving a generator then you won't be changing engine speed
    much either.

    Though nowadays you might as well chuck a microprocessor in and see -
    that way lies better instrumentation, process control and outputs like efficiency, noise, engine wear and so on.

    For a car now, a microprocessor gets more interesting and dynamic,
    especially in direct drive. I designed a flash steam car about 30 years
    ago, but it never got built. Hmmm...

    because you have the sea as a "cold-well temperature" to condense the
    working fluid steam back to water to go back through the cycle:

    If it's steam, basically anything which will condense the steam is
    enough. Though a copious cold end always helps, at least a little.

    an embedded electronic control device would make possible a
    "flash-steam" turbine power unit.

    It could sense temperature at the output of the "helix of tube" boiler
    with a thermocouple, the power draw on the machine, and instruct
    electric pumps for liquid fuel and the water from the condenser.

    (carnot-cycle-eff
    (my-tc2k 800) ;; 1073.15
    (my-tc2k 70) ;; 343.15
    ) ;; 0.6802404137352653

    The potential efficiency of the device is around 68%.

    No, first a steam engine is not a Carnot cycle engine, it is a
    (hopefully condensing) Rankine cycle. Second, small - and by small I
    mean anything smaller than huge - turbines are inherently less efficient
    than reciprocating engines. You'll be lucky to get 15% even with really
    good design.

    You might want to look at Sterling engines.


    I must absolutely leave this alone - but I had to ask if this is
    already known.

    Steam turbine ships? see Turbinia.

    Peter Fairbrother

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 8 07:38:41 2024
    Thanks for the wise words about turbines.
    I have heard about low efficiency in small sizes.
    That reciptocating engines can be used in like solar power plants where
    the solar energy is passed on as steam in the design.
    Preserved but still in viable service (?) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Badger
    uses "Unaflow" engines.
    High boiler pressure for reciprocating engine at 470psi
    (/ 470 14.7) ;; 31.97278911564626
    about 32Bar.

    Thanks everyone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Fairbrother@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Sat Mar 9 17:23:50 2024
    On 07/03/2024 00:51, Jim Wilkins wrote:

    You machine each blade with two hole saw cuts like this into the rim of
    the disk:  ((
    with a smaller radius on the back one so the blade has a crescent moon profile and sharp edges.


    I tried that, but couldn't get it to work with a suitable geometry (for
    an impulse turbine) - I had problems with the back edge of the holesaw
    hitting the workpiece. If the saw was small diameter it would intersect
    the workpiece on both edges, and if the diameter was large enough that
    it didn't interfere the turbine blade was too straight.

    Had visions of a flexible belt blade running over a curved surface, but
    that didn't work either. Though I am thinking of reviving the idea with
    a sanding belt for final polishing.

    Nowadays I'd use a straight milling cutter on a CNC milling machine, or
    do a lost-PLA casting of a 3D print.

    But my turbines are small, usually less than 50mm diameter. For a yacht
    you'd want something bigger.



    But but ... does the electrical efficiency matter all that much for a
    yacht? If you are using CHP (combined heat and power) the otherwise lost
    heat can be counted as useful output, giving 95%+ overall efficiency.

    Also, suppose you had 10% electrical efficiency from something burning
    oil or a similar taxed fuel. You could claim back the transportation tax
    on 90 % of your fuel, as you would be using most of the energy from it
    for non-transportation purposes.

    Or possibly 97.5%, as you might be using the fuel solely for cooking or
    heating half the time, and using half the electricity on a microwave or
    summat.

    (on boats fuel used for transportation is taxed at a much higher rate
    than fuel used for domestic heating or cooking. Or it used to be, it's
    decades since I lived aboard)



    Peter Fairbrother

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 9 20:22:23 2024
    For what it's worth - I was thinking of
    * de Laval turbine
    * Ljungstro..m turbine
    With Ljungstrom turbine, wondered if blades could be made on tips of rod
    pegs set into the face of the disk. The centrifugal force isn't in line
    to sling the inserts out of their seats. ?
    I wondered whether the revs would have been manageable.
    Two contra-rotating discs would have been fine - two generators.
    Presumably at those revs a couple of magnets embedded in each disk?

    Idle speculation.

    I got an "Arduino" embedded device working today.
    Advantage me seeking jobs in processing - new mines opening up around
    here (Cornwall).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Sat Mar 9 20:19:20 2024
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    "Peter Fairbrother" wrote in message news:usi5v7$2ea8v$1@dont-email.me... >>
    On 07/03/2024 00:51, Jim Wilkins wrote:

    You machine each blade with two hole saw cuts like this into the rim
    of the disk: ((
    with a smaller radius on the back one so the blade has a crescent
    moon profile and sharp edges.


    I tried that, but couldn't get it to work with a suitable geometry (for
    an impulse turbine) - I had problems with the back edge of the holesaw
    hitting the workpiece. If the saw was small diameter it would intersect
    the workpiece on both edges, and if the diameter was large enough that
    it didn't interfere the turbine blade was too straight.

    I can visualize what you mean, interference limits the blade
    depth. The blades could be cut deeper with a small end mill if the
    rotary index holding the disk blank was in a swivel vise (or rotary
    table) manually turned only far enough to make the cut. The setup
    might be easier if the disk blank was fixed to a drilled index plate
    that took up less space, mounted on a vertical surface of a block that centered (or offset) the blank over the vise swivel axis.

    I design things like this graphically by drawing the separate shapes
    in CAD and moving them to touch, for example the front and back
    circles intersecting at the blank edges, then recording the center coordinates. Trigonometry can refine the precision without much risk
    of gross error.

    I would rough out the gaps first, milling an arc with hand feed
    pressure doesn't allow much depth of cut and NO climb milling.

    Hi Jim, Peter

    This and the previous "machining and eccentric" (with mention of model aeroplane "peg out of a disc" crankpins) - has really dug up something
    from my youth - mid teenage. Now 60 years of age.

    I was obsessed with getting a lathe (how met Tony of lathes.co.uk) - and
    wanted to become a machinist.

    Word was - no this is not a credible job.
    etc.

    Thing is - a structured mission is better than "kicking your heels"
    ostensibly doing something you have no interest in.
    ie. a "lowly" (sic.) mission might get you on a path, where being
    defeated out of "wrong choices" and adrift without purpose, structure or direction is going to put you six foot under.

    I am still here - and this is the first time someone has spoken to my 15-year-old-ish self - and I now at 60 years of age see what I was
    trying to do.

    I would have been drawn in to a world of vast knowledge, been "hot on
    the trail" taking-up mentoring, and had a life expanding open from that.

    When everything came crashing down, I passed off as a welder and rebuilt
    a life. So I still had to travel a similarish path.

    I recently went and for the first time discussed with some family
    friends now elderly about their son my contemporary who died by suicide
    35 years ago. I am a living link to their son. I had to profess I
    didn't know much; hadn't seen anything "dark" in the time I was nearby;
    have some knowledge of such things yet still was without basis to
    comment.

    Well; I am here. And thanks for these interesting responses.

    Best wishes,
    Rich Smith

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Fairbrother@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Sat Mar 9 23:44:26 2024
    On 09/03/2024 20:22, Richard Smith wrote:
    For what it's worth - I was thinking of
    * de Laval turbine

    A partial admission turbine is probably a good way, to go. Partial
    admission means that the incoming fluid only impinges on a few blades at
    a time rather than over the whole wheel.

    * Ljungstrom turbine
    With Ljungstrom turbine, wondered if blades could be made on tips of rod
    pegs set into the face of the disk. The centrifugal force isn't in line
    to sling the inserts out of their seats. ?

    I hadn't thought of that, it's more a bending force isn't it. And you
    can put rings on the other end of the blades so they are supported at
    both ends, with the centrifugal and pressure forces going sideways.

    Though they would typically have a last ring of axial blades for best efficiency.

    And possibly a pre-ring or two of impulse blades if the expansion
    pressure ratio is higher than about 10 (the two-spool Ljungstrom turbine
    is necessarily a reaction turbine, though in some ways it behaves like
    an impulse turbine).

    Also good is that the blades are not twisted, makes them much easier to
    make.

    I wondered whether the revs would have been manageable.
    Two contra-rotating discs would have been fine - two generators.

    Do you have to have two turning spools? [quickly googles Ljungstrom
    turbine, it's been a while]

    Hmmm, looks like one shaft is okay, in fact there has been a lot of
    work on that recently (which I haven't read...yet), see eg RAT turbines
    for ORC.

    I would stick to steam though, you don't need huge efficiency.

    Peter Fairbrother

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 10 05:49:54 2024
    I have a "Fluke" meter with clamp to measure Amps - AC and DC.
    Not the point - you are pointing to a project.

    I did think of a device to measure voltage - get it to "stab" in at the torch/gun - and have it speak the voltage so you can run the arc and
    weld while having the info.
    I bet there are voice devices for saying numbers?

    GnuPlot will graph text files of data - my perception there is no need
    to keep the data in other than text format. A compression algorithm
    like "bzip2" can get compress the files ot fractions of the former size
    - so easy to keep data.

    I've done sampling (?) before: http://www.weldsmith.co.uk/tech/welding/datalog/datalog_weldproc.html
    Welding - MIG/GMAW "waveforms" revealed by datalogging
    Noting average-Amps x average-Volts does not give average-Power with
    systematic pulse waveforms.

    Arduino - I was rather delighted about "getting" that one.
    Have programmed in "C" before, so head start.
    Quickly extended beyond tutorials, using
    loops "for..."
    conditionals "if..."
    to get more interesting things happening.
    eg. LED's flashing morse-code
    from tutorial getting an LED to light.
    Hopefully this will stand as a "proof of concept" and be the start of a progression - hopefully with the adjective "rapid".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 10 05:30:12 2024
    Thanks for interesting responses.
    This whole matter must remain a conjecture.
    Appreciate you developing this and not leaving it as a "loose end",

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Fairbrother@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Sun Mar 10 16:36:59 2024
    On 09/03/2024 19:11, Jim Wilkins wrote:

    I can visualize what you mean, interference limits the blade depth. The blades could be cut deeper with a small end mill if the rotary index
    holding the disk blank was in a swivel vise (or rotary table) manually
    turned only far enough to make the cut. The setup might be easier if the
    disk blank was fixed to a drilled index plate that took up less space, mounted on a vertical surface of a block that centered (or offset) the
    blank over the vise swivel axis.

    Nowadays I only cut ceramic turbine wheels on a CNC mill [*] - it has five-and-a-half axes, but I only use three (plus a rotary table) for
    turbine wheels, that's good enough, so the result is similar to your setup.

    For ceramics, don't buy the "machinable" ceramics, they are horribly
    expensive and their properties are lesser. I get most of my alumina from
    a no-name chinese source, can be brittle but it is usually ok if yuo
    keep that in mind. Also Morgan ceramics for high tech and high
    reliability stuff (Si3N4, ZrO2).

    Diamond tooling is not expensive if you a) buy the tools in reasonable quantities and b) keep the water flowing, or even just there. Been
    meaning to make my own diamond tooling, but I don't know how and haven't
    really tried - anyone?


    I would rough out the gaps first, milling an arc with hand feed pressure doesn't allow much depth of cut and NO climb milling.

    NO climb milling is always good :) even in ballscew equipped CNC mills. Somewhat less important when you are using abrasive rather than cutting
    tools, but still.

    Keeping diamond and abrasive ceramic containing slurry out of ballscrews
    is also good, damhikt.



    Peter Fairbrother

    [*] technically it's a CNC-converted BCA jig borer, but it has hefty
    upgraded ballscrews, improved lateral stiffness and is pretty much only
    used on ceramics with abrasive diamond tooling; though I can fit an ER20
    collet shaft and a slower motor. I also have a manual BCA.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Fairbrother@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Sun Mar 10 19:26:01 2024
    On 10/03/2024 16:55, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Peter Fairbrother"  wrote in message news:usknjc$329n7$1@dont-email.me...

    [*] technically it's a CNC-converted BCA jig borer, but it has hefty
    upgraded ballscrews, improved lateral stiffness and is pretty much only
    used on ceramics with abrasive diamond tooling; though I can fit an ER20 collet shaft and a slower motor. I also have a manual BCA.

    ------------------------------

    Nice!
    I have two Henry Hauser vertical mills of similar vintage

    Oooh ... :)

    , unfortunately
    lever feed for production instead of leadscrew. The seller told me they
    made WW1 artillery fuses.

    I actually have six BCA's, though only two are in working use. I was
    picking them up for about £200 each a few years ago and thought to
    recondition and/or cnc-convert them, but that plan went agley and they
    are now sitting in my nice dry airing cupboard along with some ML10s and
    other stuff I have no room to use. Must get a bigger workshop!

    The BCA is based on and almost identical to a Boley/Leinen design from
    the 1930s (which was based on an earlier 1880's design). I only have one
    WW2 example, badged Excel (apparently they rebadged someone else's
    work), but I believe it was used to make jigs for anti-aircraft shell
    fuzes. The rest, like the BCA name, are post-war.

    A story I heard, don't know whether it is true or not, is that just
    before WW2 the British Government ordered Excel to make lots of BCAs.
    Excel (or whoever) then continued to pay design royalties to
    Boley/Leinen right through 1940. Ouch! Postwar, the design rights were considered to be spoils of war.

    But Tenga still make them - basically a 1880 design - at £10,500 each
    last time I checked.

    That old cast iron is still going strong - and 50 years of settling
    can't hurt :)


    Did you do the CNC conversion?

    Yes.


    Peter Fairbrother

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Billington@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Mon Mar 11 13:53:22 2024
    On 11/03/2024 13:30, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Peter Fairbrother"  wrote in message
    news:usl1ga$34frv$1@dont-email.me...

    A story I heard, don't know whether it is true or not, is that just
    before WW2 the British Government ordered Excel to make lots of BCAs.
    Excel (or whoever) then continued to pay design royalties to
    Boley/Leinen right through 1940. Ouch! Postwar, the design rights were considered  to be spoils of war.

    Peter Fairbrother

    ------------------------
    The US paid the German manufacturer DWM $412,520 in 1928 to settle a
    patent dispute over features of the Springfield rifle taken from the
    1893 Mauser.
    https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=15846

    I've read but can't find where that Britain and Germany both bought
    20mm aircraft cannon from Oerlikon, all with barrels made from German
    steel.

    I was watching a program the other day about the restoration of a
    Spitfire in the Shuttleworth collection IIRC and they mentioned it being
    fitted with a 20mm cannon to match what the Germans used and they
    mentioned it as Hispano Suiza, maybe this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hispano-Suiza_HS.404 .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Leon Fisk@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Fri Mar 22 14:29:24 2024
    On Fri, 08 Mar 2024 07:38:41 +0000
    Richard Smith <null@void.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    Preserved but still in viable service (?) >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Badger
    uses "Unaflow" engines.
    High boiler pressure for reciprocating engine at 470psi
    (/ 470 14.7) ;; 31.97278911564626
    about 32Bar.

    Sets sail for the season soon🙂

    ===
    LUDINGTON, MI – The S.S. Badger car ferry marked the 71st anniversary
    of its maiden voyage across Lake Michigan on Thursday, March 21,
    officials said...
    ===

    https://www.mlive.com/news/2024/03/ss-badger-car-ferry-marks-71st-anniversary-of-maiden-voyage-across-lake-michigan.html

    There's a link in the article to another that has quite a few historic
    photos and a bit more info...

    --
    Leon Fisk
    Grand Rapids MI

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Fairbrother@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Sat Mar 23 02:51:56 2024
    On 23/03/2024 00:30, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Leon Fisk"  wrote in message news:utkim4$32jtl$1@dont-email.me...

    LUDINGTON, MI – The S.S. Badger car ferry marked the 71st anniversary
    of its maiden voyage across Lake Michigan on Thursday, March 21,
    officials said...

    -----------------------------------

    That's quite a service record. Ocean liners on the North Atlantic run
    wore out in 20-30 years.


    Waverley Excursions – The world's last Seagoing paddle steamer

    <https://waverleyexcursions.co.uk/>(and yes, the Scottish scenery is
    as beautiful as it looks)

    I ran away on her when I was about 7. The engineer allowed me to sit on
    the end of the crankshaft and the parallel motion bearings of the
    largest cylinders of her triple bank triple expansion steam engines when
    moving (slowly).

    Then he bought me a whisky in the bar and sent me home.



    Peter Fairbrother

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Sat Mar 23 08:46:58 2024
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    "Leon Fisk" wrote in message news:utkim4$32jtl$1@dont-email.me...

    LUDINGTON, MI – The S.S. Badger car ferry marked the 71st anniversary
    of its maiden voyage across Lake Michigan on Thursday, March 21,
    officials said...

    -----------------------------------

    That's quite a service record. Ocean liners on the North Atlantic run
    wore out in 20-30 years.

    25 years service life before scrapping for ocean-going ships: about
    equally dependent on at least these two dominating things

    * seawater corrosion
    Seawater happens to be for steel the "pessimum" composition - if you add
    more salt it becomes less corrosive (?). Corrosion is ferocious.

    * fatigue
    The ship going over ocean waves goes alternatively between "convex" and "concave" bending - wave peak in middle of ship; ship on waves at bow
    and stern.

    Both of these are attacking all over the ship, likely in places you
    cannot easily see.
    Then yes machinery is coming up to needing refurb. - which could be done
    - but isn't worth it when faced with the big two of corrosion + fatigue.

    There are freighters on the Great Lakes at around 100 years old.
    Being on fresh water (vastly less corrosive) and without the coean waves
    (no fatigue) this can be so.

    Also - apparently - the steam-turbine ships as very quiet and smooth -
    if as family of someone to do with the Company you get invited to be
    passengers on a voyage you go on a steam-turbine ship.

    The bulkers used to be coming in and out of Cleveland when I was working
    there.
    Manouvring out in the Cuyahoga river, there was some heat-haze above the
    funnel (stack). Was hilarious sight on Friday nights when everyone
    partying by the riverside and pleasure boats around on the river while
    another 20,000 tonnes of cargo went on the move.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 23 08:48:21 2024
    Love this story.
    Best wishes

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)