• I decided to fix it - Sorta Kinda

    From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 19 17:41:14 2024
    As I might have mentioned sometime back the Hurco KMB1 has developed
    backlash and become untunable in the Y axis, and mid job went from
    tolerable to catastrophic backlash on the X-axis.

    I had decided to scrap it out, and if it had been less work to do so it
    would probably already be gone.

    The thing is its got the second biggest work envelope of all the mills
    in the shop, and the biggest of the CNC mills. Until I bought the South
    Bend 10x54 knee mill the Hurco was the biggest work envelope mill in the
    shop. Its still the heaviest mill at about 4000lbs.

    I am probably going to do something stupid, but I'm doing it anyway.
    I'm eliminating the servos and putting closed loop steppers on it.
    Yeah, yeah, yeah... "Servos rule and steppers drool." I already have 4 absolutely massive Nema 34 closed loop steppers, and one that's even
    bigger. They were for another project which I may never get to, and
    well I can buy more or use the servos on it instead.

    I'm eliminating the belt drive on the Y axis. I think it may have wound
    up compounding the backlash on that axis. It was also sucking up some
    of the usable power. It will get a direct drive. Either a flex plate
    coupler or a massive helical coupler. I thought about making it direct
    drive before, but the servo sticking straight out the front makes for a
    big doghouse to bump into right about crotch height (depending on the
    knee height). The extra heavy stepper is shorter than the servo, and if
    I write the end program macro and tool change macros to move the saddle
    all the way out from the column it will be mostly under the table top
    enclosure anyway. I also no longer need to stand in front of the machine
    doing manual work with the MPG since I have a half decent manual machine
    now.

    Both the X & Y axis will be getting new ball screws and new fixed end
    bearings. I found a vendor with some decent quality (claimed) metric
    ball screws about the right size and better backlash than Hurco claimed
    for that machine in the manual. I'll have to pick a micro step count
    that comes out to a nice even steps per inch, but I've done that with
    metric ball screws before.

    ** Hurco claimed .003 or better in the manual I have. When I first got
    it running I was getting much better than .001 not counting flex. For
    aluminum there really was no significant flex. In steel it would run
    better than .003 including flex all day, and of course I could program
    multiple cleanup passes with an "MO" stop to measure and hit the stop
    button or hit resume. I have to add that was total flex. I didn't
    realize back then how much of that was the tool itself.

    The X axis will be configured they same as the Y, but with one of the
    regularly massive NEMA 34 steppers. I may need to make a new doghouse,
    or I may be able to get away with just cutting that one shorter.

    I don't know about the Z. Currently the backlash is good, and most of
    that is taken up by the weight of the quill anyway. I am thinking if I eliminate the belt drive on it as well I might be able to use that
    recovered power lost in the belt for a little more acceleration. If I
    go direct drive I will have to make a new head cover for the top since
    the motor would be sticking up.

    Ideally I would love to see reliable 30iss (or better) and 250-300ipm.
    Yeah I ran that much with the original GeckoDrives and they kept frying
    even though Gecko swore they could take it. I kept turning down the
    current, rapids, and acceleration, and the Geckos still kept frying.
    Later I ran the servos with an ammeter connected while adjusting the
    gibbs, and they never should have been dying. The Geckos just suck.
    The Dugong 160-35s have been pretty good. Acceleration initially was
    insane as was rapid speed, but once I started tuning them, and reducing following error they were little better than the Geckos... except they
    didn't fry if you looked at them cross eyed like the Gecko drives.

    I really like the number of error outputs on the drives. I can setup a diagnostic bank to show me what error "exactly" is happening instead of
    having to guess or go plugin the laptop with servo tuning software and
    hope I can duplicate it.

    Probably I'll go back to my old breakout board too. All the inputs are settable as high or low trigger. Not so with the current BOB. I had to
    use low current trigger relays for some of the senors to swap the high
    and low. Blech. I'll keep the ethernet motion controller instead of
    going back to the USB one. The BOB plugins for them are the same on
    both boards. The current BOB also didn't tune as cleanly for 0-10 RPM
    output, and forward reverse triggering. The old one was dead nuts at
    every speed I ever checked it from 96RPM (3hz) to 3600 (120hz) after the initial setup.

    It's been a while. I'm probably going to have to relearn a lot of the
    setup.

    I'll probably be getting rid of the old Mitsubishi VFD for spindle motor control. It tops out at 120hz. I've got a little turret lathe that
    might go on. I have since learned that Hurco used to do an upgrade to
    these machines to bump them to 6000 rpm (200hz) without changing the
    spindles or upgrading the bearings. I put new bearings in this spindle
    a while back. Not that many hours of run time though. After break-in
    they run quiet without getting hot, so I guess I must have done it
    right. I also have another set of new old stock original bearings in
    the control cabinet. If I bump this spindle to 6000 rpm any program I
    already have for the Tormach (5120 rpm) will run on this machine. I
    already have a slightly larger spindle on hand I used briefly for a
    companion spindle that will run up to 400hz. I've programmed these VFDs before, so setting it to top at 200hz should be pretty easy.

    It seems Mach 3 does not support rigid tapping. I had hoped to pick a
    good RPM and use the Hurco for tension compression tapping (pseudo rigid tapping). An upgrade to Mach 4 or a switch to LinuxCNC may be in order
    down the road. LinuxCNC doesn't run my motion controller so that would
    mean another BOB and motion control swap, but LinuxCNC (core of Tormach Pathpilot) is really clean and has a great trajectory planner. I have
    grown to really like the PathPilot software running my Tormach. The
    thing is I have never successfully setup LinuxCNC before. I tried a
    couple times, but went back to Mach 3 because I just knew how to set it
    up. Oh. I can't run any Tormach Code file after all. I use tension compression tapping on it all the time. Maybe copy the Tormach style
    library to a Hurco library and change all the TC styles to
    thread mill styles.

    One thing at a time. Today I am getting the servos off and the ball
    screws out for the X&Y axis.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 20 13:43:36 2024
    Why after all this time did I decide to fix it. Honestly I think it
    might be less work. Mostly it makes financial sense.

    Its not huge with a stock 14 x 24 work envelope, but the swivel/
    extendable (does not articulate) head gives if a much larger job size if
    you make choices that allow you to reindex after moving the head.
    Notice I said "stock" work envelope. I did hard limit testing, and by
    using by found I could program soft limits at 14 x 26. I can't do much
    with the X to make it any bigger than that due to design, but I can
    probably add a couple inches over over hang travel in the front since I
    am remaking front fixed bearing mount and motor mount anyway. I can
    probably get a mechanical limit of around 16 x 26. (inches people)

    For a heavy weight machine around this size with good low speed motor
    torque this I'd have to spend a bit of change. I think 3-4 days of
    actual work, not all at once, and with other machines running in the
    background the labor cost is significant. I'll be spending a few
    thousand dollars on hardware (some of which is already on hand and paid
    for). Between all of that cost to fix this machine (again) its still a fraction of the price of a comparable new machine.

    I'll need to buy one ball screw and some ACB bearing pairs. Everything
    else I think I already have on hand. Okay a little more if I change the
    Z configuration.



    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Tue May 21 11:34:52 2024
    On 5/20/2024 6:11 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:v2gclp$5raq$1@dont-email.me...

    Why after all this time did I decide to fix it.  Honestly I think it
    might be less work.  Mostly it makes financial sense. ...

    -----------------------

    Are you trying to convince us, or yourself?

    I don't mind listening/reading, explaining a plan coherently to someone
    else is a good way to force yourself to logically organize it and pin
    down the less certain parts.

    Or you could talk to yourself. Some might call that crazy, others "rehearsing".


    I was just talking to myself this morning. I couldn't find my coffee
    cup and I was screaming... "WHY?"

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pyotr filipivich@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 22 08:39:30 2024
    Bob La Londe <none@none.com99> on Tue, 21 May 2024 11:34:52 -0700
    typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:
    On 5/20/2024 6:11 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:v2gclp$5raq$1@dont-email.me...

    Why after all this time did I decide to fix it.  Honestly I think it
    might be less work.  Mostly it makes financial sense. ...

    -----------------------

    Are you trying to convince us, or yourself?

    I don't mind listening/reading, explaining a plan coherently to someone
    else is a good way to force yourself to logically organize it and pin
    down the less certain parts.

    Or you could talk to yourself. Some might call that crazy, others
    "rehearsing".


    I was just talking to myself this morning. I couldn't find my coffee
    cup and I was screaming... "WHY?"

    "Why is my coffee cup over there and not here where I expect it to
    be?"

    I've reached that point in life where I think about (and talk
    about) the here after. "Now, what am I here after?"
    "I remembered we needed some sugar, but what for?"

    "Now, where are the parts I made for this assembly?"
    --
    pyotr filipivich
    "With Age comes Wisdom. Although far too often, Age travels alone."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)