TURMEL: Judge Horne prematurely dismisses Covid damages actions

JCT: Case Management Judge Mandy Aylen struck my action
seeking a declaration that Covid Mortality Hyped Hundredfold
was a false alarm and any Covid mitigation restrictions
would be unconstitutional and damages due to lockdown for a
false alarm because I needed a federal restriction on me
which I did not have. She couldn't set the precedent of
declaring any restriction would be.

She stayed the actions of the other 75 plaintiffs who joined
me in seeking the declaration and damages pending the
exhaustion of my appeals.

Judge Horne was then appointed to replace Judge Aylen as
Case Management Judge.

On May 11 2023, the Supreme Court dismissed my Application
for Leave to Appeal. Usually, that ends it but in
exceedingly rare circumstances, a motion for reconsideration
is allowed.

Given excess deaths are going through the roof around the
world and I'm the SmartestManOnEarth.Ca,
http://SmartestMan.Ca for short, I wanted them to set the
precedent and declare Covid Mortality Hyped Hundredfold as a
false alarm and any Covid mitigation restrictions would be
unconstitutional. So I filed a motion for reconsideration by
the Supreme Court of Canada.

But Judge Horne was not aware. So the other 75 plaintiffs
received an Order dismissing their actions, with brother Ray
Turmel as Lead Plaintiff, and giving them 10 days to make
submissions as to costs. http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19j4.pdf


JCT: I thought I had sent the Registry an announcement that
there was going to be a Motion to Reconsider. But maybe it
wasn't passed along.

So Lead Plaintiff Ray Turmel filed a motion for Judge Horne
to reconsider his Jun 19 2023 Order given my appeals were
not yet exhausted:
http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19j4n.pdf

File: T-138-21
BETWEEN:
RAYMOND TURMEL
Applicant/Plaintiff
And

HIS MAJESTY THE KING
Respondent/Defendant

NOTICE OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
(Pursuant to Rule 397(1))

TAKE NOTICE THAT the Plaintiff, Raymond Turmel, will make a
motion to Case Management Judge Horne in writing under Rule
369 of the Federal Courts Rules.

Lead Plaintiff Ray Turmel filed a motion for Judge Horne
to reconsider his Order given my appeals were not yet
exhausted:
THE MOTION IS FOR an Order to Reconsider the Court's Jun 19
2023 Order and that such decision on my and other claims be
adjourned pending the final determination of the Turmel
Motion to Reconsider in the Supreme Court?

AND FOR ANY ORDER abridging the time or mode of service or
dispensing with any documents or amending any error or
omission which this Honourable Court may allow.

THE GROUNDS ARE THAT a motion to the Supreme Court of Canada
to reconsider the dismissal of the John Turmel application
for leave to appeal has been filed for exceptionally rare
circumstances and so the decision to strike the John Turmel
Statement of Claim T-130-21 is not yet final.

Dated at Grenville-sur-la-Rouge on Jun 22 2023.
Raymond Turmel
To: James Schneider

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS

1. The Court Order stated:

[1] On or about May 16, 2023, I issued the following
direction in these proceedings:

These actions have been stayed pending the final
determination of the proceedings in T-130-21 (the
proceeding commenced by John Turmel).

The statement of claim in T-130-21 was struck,
without leave to amend, by prothonotary Aylen (as
she then was, as that office was then titled) on
July 12, 2021. Her decision was upheld on appeal
(Turmel v Canada, 2021 FC 1095). A further appeal
to the Court of Appeal was dismissed (Turmel v
Canada, 2022 FCA 166). Mr Turmel's application for
leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was
dismissed (John Turmel v. His Majesty the King,
2023 CanLII 39581 (SCC)).

The decision in T-130-21 to strike the statement of
claim is therefore final.

THIS COURT ORDERS that:

1. The statements of claim in Court file T-138-21,
and each of the Court files listed in Annex A to
this order, are struck, without leave to amend.

2. His Majesty the King, the defendant in T-138-21
and each of the Court files listed in Annex A to
this order, shall serve and file submissions as to
costs within 10 days of the date of this order, not
to exceed 5 pages. Any responding submissions as to
costs from the plaintiffs in T-138-21 and each of
the Court files listed in Annex A to this order
shall be served and filed within 20 days of the
date of this order, not to exceed 5 pages.

2. A motion to the Supreme Court of Canada to reconsider the
dismissal of the John Turmel application for leave to appeal
for exceptionally rare circumstances has been filed and so
the decision to strike the John Turmel Statement of Claim T-
138-21 is not yet final.

3. Applicant seeks an Order to adjourn the final decision
herein pending the final determination of the Turmel Motion
to Reconsider in the Supreme Court?

Dated at Grenville-sur-la-Rouge on Jun 22 2023.
Raymond Turmel

JCT:
If Judge Horne doesn't correct the premature order,
then I'll get one of the plaintiffs to file an argument for
no costs by the 29th. Only 1 person rather than have
everyone fill out a template makes less work for the Crown
and the Court, especially since I've been declared a
vexatious litigant and can't publish templates any more.

The Federal Court of Appeal Justice Laskin also just
declared me a Vexatious Litigant before my appeal of the
Vexatious Litigant declaration by the Federal Court. http://SmartestMan.Ca/s40cn2jr.pdf

So I've had to ask them to reconsider:
http://SmartestMan.Ca/s40rn.pdf

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)