And oddly the Alan troll just can' seem to deal with it.
On 2024-06-15 13:41, Loran wrote:
And oddly the Alan troll just can' seem to deal with it.
There's nothing to deal with.
It's not law yet.
Canada is about to make a reality of what
George Orwell labeled “thoughtcrime” in his dystopian novel 1984.
Canada is about to make a reality of what
George Orwell labeled “thoughtcrime” in his dystopian novel 1984.
They want to do the same thing in United States.
<https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64491>
D. Ray wrote:
Canada is about to make a reality of what
George Orwell labeled thoughtcrime in his dystopian novel 1984.
They want to do the same thing in United States.
<https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64491>
Good context:
As I reported in April, the bill was introduced by a bipartisan pair of >AIPAC-funded senators -- Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-NV) and Sen. James Lankford >(R-OK) -- and championed by the ADL for its provisions aimed at
stripping Americans of their free speech rights.
RINO traitors must be dealt with!
On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:50:24 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
D. Ray wrote:
Canada is about to make a reality of what
George Orwell labeled “thoughtcrime” in his dystopian novel 1984.
They want to do the same thing in United States.
<https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64491>
Good context:
As I reported in April, the bill was introduced by a bipartisan pair of
AIPAC-funded senators -- Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-NV) and Sen. James Lankford
(R-OK) -- and championed by the ADL for its provisions aimed at
stripping Americans of their free speech rights.
RINO traitors must be dealt with!
You don't need a law to stop free speech. If a certain "free speech" advocates violence, there are laws to arrest the hate mongers.
As has been said, "you are not allowed to falsely yell fire in a
crowded theater."
You people get to damn complicated with all your frantic "solutions".
You don't need a law to stop free speech. If a certain "free speech" advocates violence, there are laws to arrest the hate mongers.
mark@invalid.com wrote:
You don't need a law to stop free speech. If a certain "free speech"
advocates violence, there are laws to arrest the hate mongers.
Not the USA. You can only get in trouble if you commit a real
crime or take material steps thereof.
On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:25:39 -0700, Siri Cruise
<chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
mark@invalid.com wrote:
You don't need a law to stop free speech. If a certain "free speech"
advocates violence, there are laws to arrest the hate mongers.
Not the USA. You can only get in trouble if you commit a real
crime or take material steps thereof.
That's nonsense that only a "real" crime is punishable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions
The Supreme Court has held that "advocacy of the use of force" is
unprotected when it is "directed to inciting or producing imminent
lawless action" and is "likely to incite or produce such action".[8]
Incitement to suicide
In 2017, a juvenile court in Massachusetts ruled that repeatedly
encouraging someone to commit suicide was not protected by the First Amendment,[12] and found a 20-year-old woman, who was 17 at the time
of the offense, guilty of manslaughter on this basis.[13] The judge
cited a little-known 1816 precedent.[14] On February 6, 2019, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the defendant acted
with criminal intent, so her involuntary manslaughter conviction was
ordered to stand.[15] The United States Supreme Court declined to hear
the case in January 2020, leaving in place the Massachusetts Supreme
Court conviction.[16]
Fighting words
Main article: Fighting words
A Westboro Baptist Church protest was the subject of an "offensive
speech" Supreme Court case in Snyder v. Phelps (2010)
In Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942), the Supreme Court held that
speech is unprotected if it constitutes "fighting words".[37] Fighting
words, as defined by the Court, is speech that "tend[s] to incite an immediate breach of the peace" by provoking a fight, so long as it is
a "personally abusive [word] which, when addressed to the ordinary
citizen, is, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to
provoke a violent reaction".[38] Additionally, such speech must be
"directed to the person of the hearer" and is "thus likely to be seen
as a 'direct personal insult'".[39][40]
"True threats of violence" that are directed at a person or group of
persons that have the intent of placing the target at risk of bodily
harm or death are generally unprotected.[41] However, there are
several exceptions. For example, the Supreme Court has held that
"threats may not be punished if a reasonable person would understand
them as obvious hyperbole", he writes.[42][43] Additionally, threats
of "social ostracism" and of "politically motivated boycotts" are constitutionally protected.[44]
On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:25:39 -0700, Siri Cruise
<chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
mark@invalid.com wrote:
You don't need a law to stop free speech. If a certain "free speech"
advocates violence, there are laws to arrest the hate mongers.
Not the USA. You can only get in trouble if you commit a real
crime or take material steps thereof.
That's nonsense that only a "real" crime is punishable.
mark@invalid.com wrote:
You don't need a law to stop free speech. If a certain "free speech"
advocates violence, there are laws to arrest the hate mongers.
Not the USA. You can only get in trouble if you commit a real crime or
take material steps thereof.
On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:50:24 -0600, Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
D. Ray wrote:
Canada is about to make a reality of what
George Orwell labeled thoughtcrime in his dystopian novel 1984.
They want to do the same thing in United States.
<https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64491>
Good context:
As I reported in April, the bill was introduced by a bipartisan pair of
AIPAC-funded senators -- Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-NV) and Sen. James Lankford
(R-OK) -- and championed by the ADL for its provisions aimed at
stripping Americans of their free speech rights.
RINO traitors must be dealt with!
You don't need a law to stop free speech. If a certain "free speech" advocates violence, there are laws to arrest the hate mongers.
There's nothing to deal with.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 165:50:11 |
Calls: | 10,385 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,057 |
Messages: | 6,416,528 |