Seventy-two hours after an assassin shot and nearly killed Donald Trump
in Pennsylvania, here’s the official story so far: A random 20-year-old >acting completely alone walked within 150 yards of a presidential
campaign rally with a rifle, climbed onto a rooftop in full view of
Secret Service snipers, set up his shot and fired without anyone
intervening and with no help from anyone.
"Brave boys in blue," my ass!
Swill
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people tothrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 02:40:43 -0500, K Wills <k.w90@kw.kw> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 21:05:07 -0500, Matt Walsh
<daily@mailer.dailywire.com> wrote:
Seventy-two hours after an assassin shot and nearly killed Donald Trump >>>in Pennsylvania, here’s the official story so far: A random 20-year-old >>>acting completely alone walked within 150 yards of a presidential >>>campaign rally with a rifle, climbed onto a rooftop in full view of >>>Secret Service snipers, set up his shot and fired without anyone >>>intervening and with no help from anyone.
[...]
I do find it odd that he was able to get to the roof, line up his >>site, then fire. All while the Secret Service and law enforcement were >>unaware?
What caught my attention was when several attendees brought the shooter to the attention
of the local cops - and nobody did anything about it. Apparently they eventually notified
the SS that there were reports of a shooter, but no action was taken. At least two
different cops were near the roof, one tried to intervene but backed off - and stayed
backed off - when the shooter aimed at him.
"Brave boys in blue," my ass!
Reichstag fire or failed conspiracy?------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Swill
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people tothrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 04:27:55 -0500, K Wills <k.w90@kw.kw> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:00:06 -0400, Governor Swill >><governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 02:40:43 -0500, K Wills <k.w90@kw.kw> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 21:05:07 -0500, Matt Walsh >>>><daily@mailer.dailywire.com> wrote:
Seventy-two hours after an assassin shot and nearly killed Donald Trump >>>>>in Pennsylvania, here’s the official story so far: A random 20-year-old >>>>>acting completely alone walked within 150 yards of a presidential >>>>>campaign rally with a rifle, climbed onto a rooftop in full view of >>>>>Secret Service snipers, set up his shot and fired without anyone >>>>>intervening and with no help from anyone.
[...]
I do find it odd that he was able to get to the roof, line up his >>>>site, then fire. All while the Secret Service and law enforcement were >>>>unaware?
What caught my attention was when several attendees brought the shooter to the attention
of the local cops - and nobody did anything about it. Apparently they eventually notified
the SS that there were reports of a shooter, but no action was taken. At least two
different cops were near the roof, one tried to intervene but backed off - and stayed
backed off - when the shooter aimed at him.
"Brave boys in blue," my ass!
It strikes me as very odd.
Reichstag fire or failed conspiracy?
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 02:45:28 -0500, K Wills <k.w90@kw.kw> wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 14:52:56 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 04:27:55 -0500, K Wills <k.w90@kw.kw> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:00:06 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 02:40:43 -0500, K Wills <k.w90@kw.kw> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 21:05:07 -0500, Matt Walsh
<daily@mailer.dailywire.com> wrote:
Seventy-two hours after an assassin shot and nearly killed Donald Trump >>>>>>> in Pennsylvania, here’s the official story so far: A random 20-year-old
acting completely alone walked within 150 yards of a presidential >>>>>>> campaign rally with a rifle, climbed onto a rooftop in full view of >>>>>>> Secret Service snipers, set up his shot and fired without anyone >>>>>>> intervening and with no help from anyone.
[...]
I do find it odd that he was able to get to the roof, line up his >>>>>> site, then fire. All while the Secret Service and law enforcement were >>>>>> unaware?
What caught my attention was when several attendees brought the shooter to the attention
of the local cops - and nobody did anything about it. Apparently they eventually notified
the SS that there were reports of a shooter, but no action was taken. At least two
different cops were near the roof, one tried to intervene but backed off - and stayed
backed off - when the shooter aimed at him.
"Brave boys in blue," my ass!
It strikes me as very odd.
Reichstag fire or failed conspiracy?
As more information comes out, I think it's a lot of incompetent
people.
I suspect an undercurrent of "Who would shoot our leader in middle America?" A thought so
alien, it can only invoke astonishment; disbelief.
LEOs are a rich source of Republican votes and the left is not noted for violent
solutions. The sin might have been incompetence brought on by overconfidence.
Swill
Who cares, he's too old and senile to serve anyway.
I suspect an undercurrent
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people tothrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
Seventy-two hours after an assassin shot and nearly killed Donald Trump
in Pennsylvania, here’s the official story so far: A random 20-year-old acting completely alone walked within 150 yards of a presidential
campaign rally with a rifle, climbed onto a rooftop in full view of
Secret Service snipers, set up his shot and fired without anyone
intervening and with no help from anyone.
This 20-year-old is also so politically radical as to attempt an assassination and yet not radical enough to have ever posted any
political writings or commentary on any social media site ever in his
life. He also wrote no manifesto and left behind no indication about
why he did it. Even after authorities gained access to his phone, they
say they still have no clue about his motivations. All we’re told is
that, for some reason, he obviously wanted Donald Trump dead. There’s
just a handful of videos of the shooter circulating, including one in
which he makes some weird sexual joke, and one in which he appears
briefly in a Blackrock video featuring his high school classroom. Other
than that, it’s as if he never existed.
As far as we can tell, this man’s last and only political act, before attempting to kill the Republican candidate, was to register as a
Republican. Oh and apparently, there were Trump signs outside of his parent’s home, where he was living. Watch:
https://youtu.be/1KbC1dHo9_U
We have no idea why these signs are outside the shooter’s home. We have
no clarity on this point whatsoever because none of this makes sense
and no one’s explaining anything. Nevertheless, you must believe the official narrative and ask no questions about it or else you are a
conspiracy theorist. And one thing we know about assassination attempts
is that there’s never any conspiring involved.
As unbelievable and insulting as it is, this is the version of events you’re being told to accept. But with every hour that goes by, it
somehow makes even less sense than it did before. Every new detail is
more baffling than the last.
Last night, for instance CBS News reported that several Beaver County
police snipers were stationed _inside_ the building the shooter
eventually climbed on top of. They were supposedly looking for threats
in the crowd at the rally. There were no officers or snipers on the
roof, for reasons that remain unexplained, even though that’d be the rational spot to place these snipers. But it’s now an uncontested fact
that the shooter used the police staging area as a vantage point to
shoot Donald Trump.
According to the local outlet Beaver Countian, which broke the story,
A security operations plan had placed each of the three
counter-snipers inside of the building looking out of windows
toward the rally, with none stationed on its roof. Due to a
lack of manpower, the men did not have spotters assigned to
them, as would be standard operating procedure.
So maybe the excuse is that they couldn’t spare anyone to watch the
roof. They just ran out of people. Obviously we need to know exactly
who drafted that “security operations plan,” because that person should never be in charge of any security operation ever again.
Nevertheless, roughly a half hour before the shooting started, these
snipers positioned inside the building saw the 20-year-old shooter — without his rifle — “looking up at the roof observing the building” before he disappeared, then came back and sat down. This was so
suspicious that one of the snipers inside the building took a photo of
the gunman.
Additionally, according to a separate local news station, “a law enforcement officer had also previously seen Crooks on the ground and
called him in as a suspicious person with a picture before 5:45 p.m.” Officers supposedly looked around but couldn’t immediately find him.
Just to review: this man was on the radar of the security forces at the
rally 30 _minutes_ before he fired the first shot. And he fired it on
top of the very same building where the police were staged.
Already, 30 minutes before the crime took place, they had enough reason
to detain this guy and delay the rally. But it gets even worse.
At one point, in full view of the snipers inside the command post, the gunman, “took out a range finder,” prompting the police sniper to radio his command post. That meant that he alerted the Secret Service to the threat. But still, no one detained the man, and no one pulled Trump off
the stage — even though there’s only one reason a suspicious person
would be using a range finder right outside a Trump rally, and everyone
knows what it is. There is no conceivable innocent reason for a guy to
be lurking around the site of a campaign rally with a range finder. Or
if there is an innocent reason, the innocent reason is significantly
less plausible than the sinister reason. Yet nothing was done. So the
man disappeared again, then came back a third time — this time carrying
a backpack. And once again, the snipers called in to their command
post, explaining that this suspicious man was now “walking towards the
back of the building.” But nobody stopped him. Nobody took any physical action to prevent what they could evidently see coming.
Apparently, all of these reports prompted some police officers to call
for backup and try to scale the roof to stop the shooter. But they
obviously failed to do so. The gunman climbed on top of the building
using an air conditioning unit — not a ladder as previously reported — and fired several shots at Trump before he was taken out.
So what explains why Donald Trump wasn’t taken off the stage at any
point in this process, until a gunman shot him in the head? Why didn’t Secret Service snipers on the roof behind Trump take out this shooter
before he was able to open fire? If you look at some of the videos from
the rally, you’ll notice that initially, the snipers behind Trump
appear to be relaxed at first. They’re standing up. They’re not in the prone position, looking through their rifle scopes. But then, some
people in the bleachers see something. They start pointing. And
eventually the Secret Service snipers go prone, clearly responding to a threat. Here are the two clips:
https://youtu.be/rm5IFgY_zDA
This is a much more serious failure than we were told it was. This is
not a case of the Secret Service somehow failing to notice the shooter.
They clearly knew he was there, or that some potentially imminent
threat was very close to the stage. We know that from the video. We
know it from the reporting. At a minimum, they had reason to think that
Trump was in imminent danger. But they essentially did nothing in
response. They let Trump take a bullet to the head before they
addressed the threat in any way.
According to the Biden administration, we shouldn’t be outraged or concerned about any of this. Yesterday, the head of the DHS, Alejandro Mayorkas, explained that he has “100% confidence” in the director of
the Secret Service (whom he oversees). Watch:
https://youtu.be/SVvpagp1-QI
This is the same Alejandro Mayorkas who claims the border is completely secure. Now he’s saying he has 100% confidence in the director of the Secret Service, three days after the Secret Service allowed the leading presidential candidate to take a head-shot from a rifle while he
delivered a speech on stage. The only conceivable way you’d have “100 % confidence” in this agency, and the people who lead it, is if you’re absolutely fine with that outcome. At this point it’s not really a conspiracy theory to say that the Biden administration apparently
thinks Saturday’s assassination attempt was acceptable. They’re coming right out and saying it to our faces. If it was unacceptable, they
would fire the people who allowed it to happen. But they aren’t.
Saying you have 100% confidence in the Secret Service after an incident
like this is like looking out over the wreckage of a collapsed bridge
and declaring that you have a 100% confidence in the engineering team
that designed it. 100% confidence. Not even, like, 90% confidence, or
73% confidence. Their utter and total and catastrophic failure has not
lost them even one percentage point of confidence, in your book.
And it’s not just the DHS secretary saying this. Last night, Joe Biden
was asked by Lester Holt about the Director of the Secret Service. He
made it clear he has no problems with the director’s performance. He
also made it clear he has no idea who the director is, because he said “I’ve heard from him,” even though the director of the Secret Service is a woman. Watch:
https://youtu.be/uStQ7A2JRsg
So Biden may not be sure who the Director of the Secret Service is. But he’s sure that he, or she, or whoever, is doing a great job — as evidenced by the fact that her agents nearly got his chief political
rival killed. And of course, because no one in the Biden administration
has any shame whatsoever, the Secret Service director has said she has
no intention of stepping aside. It’s just like the pullout from Afghanistan, which directly resulted in the deaths of several U.S. servicemembers. No one resigned after that debacle. No one was fired.
No one in the government seemed to care, frankly. And we’re seeing that repeat after the single most significant security failure by the Secret Service since the attempt on Ronald Reagan’s life. Actually it’s worse than that. Based on everything we know now, we can say with a high
degree of confidence that this is the worst security failure by the
Secret Service in its history. But no one in any position of authority
in the agency or outside of it will be held accountable in any way whatsoever.
This is why our system of government has lost all the trust the public
may have once had in it. There’s no sense of accountability or responsibility. If anything, these people are embracing their failures
— almost as if they wanted them to happen. That means we’ll never be
told the truth about what happened in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday. We’ll never be given the full story of how it happened. Why this guy
was allowed to do this. And who this guy even is. And even if we are
someday given all of this information, there will be no reason for any
of us to believe any of it.
Who cares, he's too old and senile to serve anyway.
Trump needs to learn to lean in to those shots next time.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 02:45:28 -0500, K Wills <k.w90@kw.kw> wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 14:52:56 -0400, Governor Swill >><governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 04:27:55 -0500, K Wills <k.w90@kw.kw> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:00:06 -0400, Governor Swill >>>><governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 02:40:43 -0500, K Wills <k.w90@kw.kw> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 21:05:07 -0500, Matt Walsh >>>>>><daily@mailer.dailywire.com> wrote:
Seventy-two hours after an assassin shot and nearly killed Donald Trump >>>>>>>in Pennsylvania, here’s the official story so far: A random 20-year-old >>>>>>>acting completely alone walked within 150 yards of a presidential >>>>>>>campaign rally with a rifle, climbed onto a rooftop in full view of >>>>>>>Secret Service snipers, set up his shot and fired without anyone >>>>>>>intervening and with no help from anyone.
[...]
I do find it odd that he was able to get to the roof, line up his >>>>>>site, then fire. All while the Secret Service and law enforcement were >>>>>>unaware?
What caught my attention was when several attendees brought the shooter to the attention
of the local cops - and nobody did anything about it. Apparently they eventually notified
the SS that there were reports of a shooter, but no action was taken. At least two
different cops were near the roof, one tried to intervene but backed off - and stayed
backed off - when the shooter aimed at him.
"Brave boys in blue," my ass!
It strikes me as very odd.
Reichstag fire or failed conspiracy?
As more information comes out, I think it's a lot of incompetent >>people.
I suspect an undercurrent of "Who would shoot our leader in middle America?" A thought so
alien, it can only invoke astonishment; disbelief.
LEOs are a rich source of Republican votes and the left is not noted for violent
solutions. The sin might have been incompetence brought on by overconfidence.
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: >talk.politics.guns,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,or.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.atheism
Complete setup. Here is how it went down:
The SS paid (or promised to pay) Crooks to commit the assassination with
a promise of money and freedom after it was all over. This kid was full
on nerd nation and an easy target, as it were, for the promise of easy
money. But they never intended to allow him to live to get the payout,
or talk for that matter if the plan failed (which it did).
The coincidental string of clusterfucks gave Crooks every opportunity to >carry out the act without interference (including not even letting the
locals in on the grand plan) knowing that a shot from the distance he
was at is the equivalent to a two-foot putt and pretty much a certainty.
It wasn't negligence to not stop Crooks, it was intentional. There's no
other way to describe it. Nevertheless, whether he was successful or not
he was not leaving that roof alive.
Then he missed and the whole plan went awry. Except for the killing
Crooks part. Ddead men don't talk. So, the grand plan remains a secret.
Now the administration is only left to clean up a bit of a mess, which
is easy to do when you simply say "I have 100% confidence in the ss."
End of story.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:36:05 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 7/17/2024 10:05 PM, Matt Walsh wrote:<snip>
According to the local outlet Beaver Countian, which broke the story,
A security operations plan had placed each of the three
counter-snipers inside of the building looking out of windows
toward the rally, with none stationed on its roof. Due to a
lack of manpower, the men did not have spotters assigned to
them, as would be standard operating procedure.
So maybe the excuse is that they couldn’t spare anyone to watch the
roof. They just ran out of people. Obviously we need to know exactly
who drafted that “security operations plan,” because that person should >>> never be in charge of any security operation ever again.
Trump is notorious for flying by the seat of his pants. More than one staffer has
discussed this. It explain, for example, why the Afghanistan withdrawal went so wrong.
After bypassing the legitimate government by negotiating with terrorists, Trump sprung the
withdrawal on the Pentagon with no plan, just the order to get out.
<snip>
At one point, in full view of the snipers inside the command post, the
gunman, “took out a range finder,” prompting the police sniper to radio >>> his command post. That meant that he alerted the Secret Service to the
threat. But still, no one detained the man, and no one pulled Trump off
the stage — even though there’s only one reason a suspicious person
would be using a range finder right outside a Trump rally, and everyone
knows what it is. There is no conceivable innocent reason for a guy to
be lurking around the site of a campaign rally with a range finder. Or
if there is an innocent reason, the innocent reason is significantly
less plausible than the sinister reason.
One non sinister reason someone would use a rangefinder might be that he didn't have any
binoculars.
<snip
Then he missed and the whole plan went awry. Except for the killing
Crooks part. Ddead men don't talk. So, the grand plan remains a secret.
Now the administration is only left to clean up a bit of a mess, which
is easy to do when you simply say "I have 100% confidence in the ss."
End of story.
I'm going to enjoy the reams of "proof" of sinister conspiracies.
It's so much more
dramatic than simple incompetence.
Swill
On 7/22/2024 7:32 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:36:05 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 7/17/2024 10:05 PM, Matt Walsh wrote:<snip>
According to the local outlet Beaver Countian, which broke the story,
A security operations plan had placed each of the three
counter-snipers inside of the building looking out of windows
toward the rally, with none stationed on its roof. Due to a
lack of manpower, the men did not have spotters assigned to
them, as would be standard operating procedure.
So maybe the excuse is that they couldn’t spare anyone to watch the
roof. They just ran out of people. Obviously we need to know exactly
who drafted that “security operations plan,” because that person should
never be in charge of any security operation ever again.
Trump is notorious for flying by the seat of his pants. More than one staffer has
discussed this. It explain, for example, why the Afghanistan withdrawal went so wrong.
After bypassing the legitimate government by negotiating with terrorists, Trump sprung the
withdrawal on the Pentagon with no plan, just the order to get out.
<snip>
At one point, in full view of the snipers inside the command post, the >>>> gunman, “took out a range finder,” prompting the police sniper to radio
his command post. That meant that he alerted the Secret Service to the >>>> threat. But still, no one detained the man, and no one pulled Trump off >>>> the stage — even though there’s only one reason a suspicious person >>>> would be using a range finder right outside a Trump rally, and everyone >>>> knows what it is. There is no conceivable innocent reason for a guy to >>>> be lurking around the site of a campaign rally with a range finder. Or >>>> if there is an innocent reason, the innocent reason is significantly
less plausible than the sinister reason.
One non sinister reason someone would use a rangefinder might be that he didn't have any
binoculars.
<snip
Then he missed and the whole plan went awry. Except for the killing
Crooks part. Ddead men don't talk. So, the grand plan remains a secret.
Now the administration is only left to clean up a bit of a mess, which
is easy to do when you simply say "I have 100% confidence in the ss."
End of story.
I'm going to enjoy the reams of "proof" of sinister conspiracies.
It's so much more
dramatic than simple incompetence.
There's "simple incompetence," and there's what actually happened. The
sheer number of incompetencies is so unbelieveable that one can't help
but draw other conclusions.
Swill
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:36:05 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
[...]
Complete setup. Here is how it went down:
The SS paid (or promised to pay) Crooks to commit the assassination with
a promise of money and freedom after it was all over. This kid was full
on nerd nation and an easy target, as it were, for the promise of easy
money. But they never intended to allow him to live to get the payout,
or talk for that matter if the plan failed (which it did).
What evidence do you have for this? Actual, valid, verifiable
evidence?
The coincidental string of clusterfucks gave Crooks every opportunity to
carry out the act without interference (including not even letting the
locals in on the grand plan) knowing that a shot from the distance he
was at is the equivalent to a two-foot putt and pretty much a certainty.
Except that Crooks could aim at the ground and miss dirt.
It wasn't negligence to not stop Crooks, it was intentional. There's no
other way to describe it. Nevertheless, whether he was successful or not
he was not leaving that roof alive.
It's very probable that it was incompetence on the parts of those
in charge. As time goes on, and more evidence is made known, we will
have a better idea.
Then he missed and the whole plan went awry. Except for the killing
Crooks part. Ddead men don't talk. So, the grand plan remains a secret.
He did miss. And you're right, dead men don't talk. We may never
know Crooks' intended goal. His "grand plan" may remain a mystery
forever.
Now the administration is only left to clean up a bit of a mess, which
is easy to do when you simply say "I have 100% confidence in the ss."
End of story.
The Secret Service dropped the ball. Incompetence or intentional
is something we will have to wait to learn.
--
KWills
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:52:31 -0600, Lil dwarf Rudey <dumbasastump@invalid.org> wrote:
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.guns,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,or.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.atheism
[...]
You have an unhealthy obsession with Swill.
--
KWills
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
a bullied nerd
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people tothrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
He hungers for me.
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people tothrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 09:14:01 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 7/22/2024 7:32 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:36:05 -0400, Fred Barchetta <rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 7/17/2024 10:05 PM, Matt Walsh wrote:<snip>
According to the local outlet Beaver Countian, which broke the story, >>>>>
A security operations plan had placed each of the three
counter-snipers inside of the building looking out of windows
toward the rally, with none stationed on its roof. Due to a
lack of manpower, the men did not have spotters assigned to
them, as would be standard operating procedure.
So maybe the excuse is that they couldn’t spare anyone to watch the >>>>> roof. They just ran out of people. Obviously we need to know exactly >>>>> who drafted that “security operations plan,” because that person should
never be in charge of any security operation ever again.
Trump is notorious for flying by the seat of his pants. More than one staffer has
discussed this. It explain, for example, why the Afghanistan withdrawal went so wrong.
After bypassing the legitimate government by negotiating with terrorists, Trump sprung the
withdrawal on the Pentagon with no plan, just the order to get out.
<snip>
At one point, in full view of the snipers inside the command post, the >>>>> gunman, “took out a range finder,” prompting the police sniper to radio
his command post. That meant that he alerted the Secret Service to the >>>>> threat. But still, no one detained the man, and no one pulled Trump off >>>>> the stage — even though there’s only one reason a suspicious person >>>>> would be using a range finder right outside a Trump rally, and everyone >>>>> knows what it is. There is no conceivable innocent reason for a guy to >>>>> be lurking around the site of a campaign rally with a range finder. Or >>>>> if there is an innocent reason, the innocent reason is significantly >>>>> less plausible than the sinister reason.
One non sinister reason someone would use a rangefinder might be that he didn't have any
binoculars.
<snip
Then he missed and the whole plan went awry. Except for the killing
Crooks part. Ddead men don't talk. So, the grand plan remains a secret. >>>> Now the administration is only left to clean up a bit of a mess, which >>>> is easy to do when you simply say "I have 100% confidence in the ss."
End of story.
I'm going to enjoy the reams of "proof" of sinister conspiracies.
It's so much more
dramatic than simple incompetence.
There's "simple incompetence," and there's what actually happened. The
sheer number of incompetencies is so unbelieveable that one can't help
but draw other conclusions.
But doesn't such an error chain happen frequently? Nuclear accidents, air crashes, the
sinking of the Titanic, all events redundantly designed out, yet they do happen because
some little something went wrong followed by some other designed out little something
going wrong followed by ...
At this point in the information, it appears the breakdown was mostly with the local
police. Not that the SS did their work perfectly but the shooter was reported to the
police, the police saw the shooter, the shooter was in the space assigned to the local
cops to control
but ultimately it was the SS who took him out.
A communication breakdown happened, sure, but why didn't the cops respond more seriously
to the early reports especially since they had eyes on?
Swill
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 03:03:48 -0500, K Wills <k.w90@kw.kw> wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:36:05 -0400, Fred Barchetta >><rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
[...]
Complete setup. Here is how it went down:
The SS paid (or promised to pay) Crooks to commit the assassination with >>>a promise of money and freedom after it was all over. This kid was full >>>on nerd nation and an easy target, as it were, for the promise of easy >>>money. But they never intended to allow him to live to get the payout,
or talk for that matter if the plan failed (which it did).
What evidence do you have for this? Actual, valid, verifiable >>evidence?
A conspiracy is more fun to talk about than a bullied nerd seeking immortality.
Then he missed and the whole plan went awry. Except for the killing
Crooks part. Ddead men don't talk. So, the grand plan remains a secret.
Now the administration is only left to clean up a bit of a mess, which
is easy to do when you simply say "I have 100% confidence in the ss."
End of story.
I'm going to enjoy the reams of "proof" of sinister conspiracies.
It's so much more
dramatic than simple incompetence.
There's "simple incompetence," and there's what actually happened. The
sheer number of incompetencies is so unbelieveable that one can't help
but draw other conclusions.
On 7/23/2024 4:03 AM, K Wills wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:36:05 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
[...]
Complete setup. Here is how it went down:
The SS paid (or promised to pay) Crooks to commit the assassination with >>> a promise of money and freedom after it was all over. This kid was full
on nerd nation and an easy target, as it were, for the promise of easy
money. But they never intended to allow him to live to get the payout,
or talk for that matter if the plan failed (which it did).
What evidence do you have for this? Actual, valid, verifiable
evidence?
Other than a staggering string of incomprehensible and astonishing
fuck-up's, nothing. That's what makes conspiracy theories so much fun.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 09:20:36 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 7/23/2024 4:03 AM, K Wills wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:36:05 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
[...]
Complete setup. Here is how it went down:
The SS paid (or promised to pay) Crooks to commit the assassination with >>>> a promise of money and freedom after it was all over. This kid was full >>>> on nerd nation and an easy target, as it were, for the promise of easy >>>> money. But they never intended to allow him to live to get the payout, >>>> or talk for that matter if the plan failed (which it did).
What evidence do you have for this? Actual, valid, verifiable
evidence?
Other than a staggering string of incomprehensible and astonishing
fuck-up's, nothing. That's what makes conspiracy theories so much fun.
Well that's disappointing. I was hoping for a really good
conspiracy rant.
--
KWills
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 09:20:36 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 7/23/2024 4:03 AM, K Wills wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:36:05 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
[...]
Complete setup. Here is how it went down:
The SS paid (or promised to pay) Crooks to commit the assassination with >>>> a promise of money and freedom after it was all over. This kid was full >>>> on nerd nation and an easy target, as it were, for the promise of easy >>>> money. But they never intended to allow him to live to get the payout, >>>> or talk for that matter if the plan failed (which it did).
What evidence do you have for this? Actual, valid, verifiable
evidence?
Other than a staggering string of incomprehensible and astonishing
fuck-up's, nothing. That's what makes conspiracy theories so much fun.
Well that's disappointing. I was hoping for a really good
conspiracy rant.
--
KWills
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
Missing the bull's eye by an inch isn't really 'terrible'.
Swill
No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people tothrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
is an important step to getting there.
The injury was self-inflicted.
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 03:03:58 -0500, K Wills <k.w90@kw.kw> wrote:
It is odd that Crooks was able to get in position, line up his
gun, and fire.
Fortunately, the guy was a terrible aim.
Missing the bull's eye by an inch isn't really 'terrible'.
K Wills wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 09:20:36 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
On 7/23/2024 4:03 AM, K Wills wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:36:05 -0400, Fred Barchetta
<rush@movingpictures.com> wrote:
[...]
Complete setup. Here is how it went down:
The SS paid (or promised to pay) Crooks to commit the assassination with >>>>> a promise of money and freedom after it was all over. This kid was full >>>>> on nerd nation and an easy target, as it were, for the promise of easy >>>>> money. But they never intended to allow him to live to get the payout, >>>>> or talk for that matter if the plan failed (which it did).
What evidence do you have for this? Actual, valid, verifiable
evidence?
Other than a staggering string of incomprehensible and astonishing
fuck-up's, nothing. That's what makes conspiracy theories so much fun.
Well that's disappointing. I was hoping for a really good
conspiracy rant.
The injury was self-inflicted. He had a bit explosive glued to his
earflap. He convinced the local Hitler Youth to fire random shots
into the crowd, sacrificing himself for the glory of the
Donfather. Don Felon gets a sexy wound and campaigns on his martyrdom.
You need to fit the Illuminati into itThe injury was self-inflicted. He had a bit explosive glued to hisWell that's disappointing. I was hoping for a really goodWhat evidence do you have for this? Actual, valid, verifiable >>>>> evidence?Other than a staggering string of incomprehensible and astonishing
fuck-up's, nothing. That's what makes conspiracy theories so much fun.
conspiracy rant.
earflap. He convinced the local Hitler Youth to fire random shots
into the crowd, sacrificing himself for the glory of the
Donfather. Don Felon gets a sexy wound and campaigns on his martyrdom.
The Canadian Church of the Immaculate Liberal of the Universa
K Wills wrote:
You need to fit the Illuminati into itThe injury was self-inflicted. He had a bit explosive glued to hisconspiracy rant.What evidence do you have for this? Actual, valid, verifiable >>>>>> evidence?Other than a staggering string of incomprehensible and astonishing
fuck-up's, nothing. That's what makes conspiracy theories so much fun. >>>> Well that's disappointing. I was hoping for a really good
earflap. He convinced the local Hitler Youth to fire random shots
into the crowd, sacrificing himself for the glory of the
Donfather. Don Felon gets a sexy wound and campaigns on his martyrdom.
The Canadian Church of the Immaculate Liberal of the Universal
Discordian Communion that had been founded by the Light Knights of
the Bavarian Common Conspiracy Villainery.
Well that's disappointing. I was hoping for a really good
conspiracy rant.
The injury was self-inflicted. He had a bit explosive glued to his >>>earflap. He convinced the local Hitler Youth to fire random shots
into the crowd, sacrificing himself for the glory of the
Donfather. Don Felon gets a sexy wound and campaigns on his martyrdom.
You need to fit the Illuminati into it :)
That's who recruited the shooter. ;)
Seventy-two hours after an assassin shot and nearly killed Donald Trump
in Pennsylvania, here’s the official story so far: A random 20-year-old acting completely alone walked within 150 yards of a presidential
campaign rally with a rifle, climbed onto a rooftop in full view of
Secret Service snipers, set up his shot and fired without anyone
intervening and with no help from anyone.
This 20-year-old is also so politically radical as to attempt an assassination and yet not radical enough to have ever posted any
political writings or commentary on any social media site ever in his
life. He also wrote no manifesto and left behind no indication about
why he did it. Even after authorities gained access to his phone, they
say they still have no clue about his motivations. All we’re told is
that, for some reason, he obviously wanted Donald Trump dead. There’s
just a handful of videos of the shooter circulating, including one in
which he makes some weird sexual joke, and one in which he appears
briefly in a Blackrock video featuring his high school classroom. Other
than that, it’s as if he never existed.
As far as we can tell, this man’s last and only political act, before attempting to kill the Republican candidate, was to register as a
Republican. Oh and apparently, there were Trump signs outside of his parent’s home, where he was living. Watch:
https://youtu.be/1KbC1dHo9_U
We have no idea why these signs are outside the shooter’s home. We have
no clarity on this point whatsoever because none of this makes sense
and no one’s explaining anything. Nevertheless, you must believe the official narrative and ask no questions about it or else you are a
conspiracy theorist. And one thing we know about assassination attempts
is that there’s never any conspiring involved.
As unbelievable and insulting as it is, this is the version of events you’re being told to accept. But with every hour that goes by, it
somehow makes even less sense than it did before. Every new detail is
more baffling than the last.
Last night, for instance CBS News reported that several Beaver County
police snipers were stationed _inside_ the building the shooter
eventually climbed on top of. They were supposedly looking for threats
in the crowd at the rally. There were no officers or snipers on the
roof, for reasons that remain unexplained, even though that’d be the rational spot to place these snipers. But it’s now an uncontested fact
that the shooter used the police staging area as a vantage point to
shoot Donald Trump.
According to the local outlet Beaver Countian, which broke the story,
A security operations plan had placed each of the three
counter-snipers inside of the building looking out of windows
toward the rally, with none stationed on its roof. Due to a
lack of manpower, the men did not have spotters assigned to
them, as would be standard operating procedure.
So maybe the excuse is that they couldn’t spare anyone to watch the
roof. They just ran out of people. Obviously we need to know exactly
who drafted that “security operations plan,” because that person should never be in charge of any security operation ever again.
Nevertheless, roughly a half hour before the shooting started, these
snipers positioned inside the building saw the 20-year-old shooter — without his rifle — “looking up at the roof observing the building” before he disappeared, then came back and sat down. This was so
suspicious that one of the snipers inside the building took a photo of
the gunman.
Additionally, according to a separate local news station, “a law enforcement officer had also previously seen Crooks on the ground and
called him in as a suspicious person with a picture before 5:45 p.m.” Officers supposedly looked around but couldn’t immediately find him.
Just to review: this man was on the radar of the security forces at the
rally 30 _minutes_ before he fired the first shot. And he fired it on
top of the very same building where the police were staged.
Already, 30 minutes before the crime took place, they had enough reason
to detain this guy and delay the rally. But it gets even worse.
At one point, in full view of the snipers inside the command post, the gunman, “took out a range finder,” prompting the police sniper to radio his command post. That meant that he alerted the Secret Service to the threat. But still, no one detained the man, and no one pulled Trump off
the stage — even though there’s only one reason a suspicious person
would be using a range finder right outside a Trump rally, and everyone
knows what it is. There is no conceivable innocent reason for a guy to
be lurking around the site of a campaign rally with a range finder. Or
if there is an innocent reason, the innocent reason is significantly
less plausible than the sinister reason. Yet nothing was done. So the
man disappeared again, then came back a third time — this time carrying
a backpack. And once again, the snipers called in to their command
post, explaining that this suspicious man was now “walking towards the
back of the building.” But nobody stopped him. Nobody took any physical action to prevent what they could evidently see coming.
Apparently, all of these reports prompted some police officers to call
for backup and try to scale the roof to stop the shooter. But they
obviously failed to do so. The gunman climbed on top of the building
using an air conditioning unit — not a ladder as previously reported — and fired several shots at Trump before he was taken out.
So what explains why Donald Trump wasn’t taken off the stage at any
point in this process, until a gunman shot him in the head? Why didn’t Secret Service snipers on the roof behind Trump take out this shooter
before he was able to open fire? If you look at some of the videos from
the rally, you’ll notice that initially, the snipers behind Trump
appear to be relaxed at first. They’re standing up. They’re not in the prone position, looking through their rifle scopes. But then, some
people in the bleachers see something. They start pointing. And
eventually the Secret Service snipers go prone, clearly responding to a threat. Here are the two clips:
https://youtu.be/rm5IFgY_zDA
This is a much more serious failure than we were told it was. This is
not a case of the Secret Service somehow failing to notice the shooter.
They clearly knew he was there, or that some potentially imminent
threat was very close to the stage. We know that from the video. We
know it from the reporting. At a minimum, they had reason to think that
Trump was in imminent danger. But they essentially did nothing in
response. They let Trump take a bullet to the head before they
addressed the threat in any way.
According to the Biden administration, we shouldn’t be outraged or concerned about any of this. Yesterday, the head of the DHS, Alejandro Mayorkas, explained that he has “100% confidence” in the director of
the Secret Service (whom he oversees). Watch:
https://youtu.be/SVvpagp1-QI
This is the same Alejandro Mayorkas who claims the border is completely secure. Now he’s saying he has 100% confidence in the director of the Secret Service, three days after the Secret Service allowed the leading presidential candidate to take a head-shot from a rifle while he
delivered a speech on stage. The only conceivable way you’d have “100 % confidence” in this agency, and the people who lead it, is if you’re absolutely fine with that outcome. At this point it’s not really a conspiracy theory to say that the Biden administration apparently
thinks Saturday’s assassination attempt was acceptable. They’re coming right out and saying it to our faces. If it was unacceptable, they
would fire the people who allowed it to happen. But they aren’t.
Saying you have 100% confidence in the Secret Service after an incident
like this is like looking out over the wreckage of a collapsed bridge
and declaring that you have a 100% confidence in the engineering team
that designed it. 100% confidence. Not even, like, 90% confidence, or
73% confidence. Their utter and total and catastrophic failure has not
lost them even one percentage point of confidence, in your book.
And it’s not just the DHS secretary saying this. Last night, Joe Biden
was asked by Lester Holt about the Director of the Secret Service. He
made it clear he has no problems with the director’s performance. He
also made it clear he has no idea who the director is, because he said “I’ve heard from him,” even though the director of the Secret Service is a woman. Watch:
https://youtu.be/uStQ7A2JRsg
So Biden may not be sure who the Director of the Secret Service is. But he’s sure that he, or she, or whoever, is doing a great job — as evidenced by the fact that her agents nearly got his chief political
rival killed. And of course, because no one in the Biden administration
has any shame whatsoever, the Secret Service director has said she has
no intention of stepping aside. It’s just like the pullout from Afghanistan, which directly resulted in the deaths of several U.S. servicemembers. No one resigned after that debacle. No one was fired.
No one in the government seemed to care, frankly. And we’re seeing that repeat after the single most significant security failure by the Secret Service since the attempt on Ronald Reagan’s life. Actually it’s worse than that. Based on everything we know now, we can say with a high
degree of confidence that this is the worst security failure by the
Secret Service in its history. But no one in any position of authority
in the agency or outside of it will be held accountable in any way whatsoever.
This is why our system of government has lost all the trust the public
may have once had in it. There’s no sense of accountability or responsibility. If anything, these people are embracing their failures
— almost as if they wanted them to happen. That means we’ll never be
told the truth about what happened in Butler, Pennsylvania on Saturday. We’ll never be given the full story of how it happened. Why this guy
was allowed to do this. And who this guy even is. And even if we are
someday given all of this information, there will be no reason for any
of us to believe any of it.
On 18/7/24 03:05, Matt Walsh wrote:
Seventy-two hours after an assassin shot and nearly killed Donald
Trump in Pennsylvania, here’s the official story so far: A random
20-year-old acting completely alone walked within 150 yards of a
presidential campaign rally with a rifle, climbed onto a rooftop in
full view of Secret Service snipers, set up his shot and fired
without anyone intervening and with no help from anyone.
Yes, makes no sense, one year on.
In the 1980s every year or two there was a TV program on
the Kennedy assasination in myopic detail
until the major movie was released. Every angle,
reconstructions from towers with moving vehicles etc.
Everyone is scared to look, because he was shot and then
not shot in a time loop? At the Vatican at the funeral
of Pope Francis, President Trump was standing for a while
with his head at 90 degrees, like he was wanting to say
something.
You can't clip the ear without the rest? He lost a shoe
which had laces: high stress and weird things happen.
Was is a misfired round, a richochet, no-one knows?
People say it was staged, whatever that means. As someone did
unforunately die (the off-duty firefighter) investigations
may still be on-going.
This 20-year-old is also so politically radical as to attempt an
assassination and yet not radical enough to have ever posted any
political writings or commentary on any social media site ever in
his life. He also wrote no manifesto and left behind no indication
about why he did it. Even after authorities gained access to his
phone, they say they still have no clue about his motivations. All
we’re told is that, for some reason, he obviously wanted Donald
Trump dead. There’s just a handful of videos of the shooter
circulating, including one in which he makes some weird sexual joke,
and one in which he appears briefly in a Blackrock video featuring
his high school classroom. Other than that, it’s as if he never
existed.
As far as we can tell, this man’s last and only political act,
before attempting to kill the Republican candidate, was to register
as a Republican. Oh and apparently, there were Trump signs outside
of his parent’s home, where he was living. Watch:
https://youtu.be/1KbC1dHo9_U
We have no idea why these signs are outside the shooter’s home. We
have no clarity on this point whatsoever because none of this makes
sense and no one’s explaining anything. Nevertheless, you must
believe the official narrative and ask no questions about it or else
you are a conspiracy theorist. And one thing we know about
assassination attempts is that there’s never any conspiring
involved.
As unbelievable and insulting as it is, this is the version of
events you’re being told to accept. But with every hour that goes
by, it somehow makes even less sense than it did before. Every new
detail is more baffling than the last.
Last night, for instance CBS News reported that several Beaver
County police snipers were stationed _inside_ the building the
shooter eventually climbed on top of. They were supposedly looking
for threats in the crowd at the rally. There were no officers or
snipers on the roof, for reasons that remain unexplained, even
though that’d be the rational spot to place these snipers. But
it’s now an uncontested fact that the shooter used the police
staging area as a vantage point to shoot Donald Trump.
According to the local outlet Beaver Countian, which broke the
story,
A security operations plan had placed each of the three
counter-snipers inside of the building looking out of windows
toward the rally, with none stationed on its roof. Due to a
lack of manpower, the men did not have spotters assigned to
them, as would be standard operating procedure.
So maybe the excuse is that they couldn’t spare anyone to watch
the roof. They just ran out of people. Obviously we need to know
exactly who drafted that “security operations plan,” because
that person should never be in charge of any security operation ever
again.
Nevertheless, roughly a half hour before the shooting started, these
snipers positioned inside the building saw the 20-year-old shooter
— without his rifle — “looking up at the roof observing the
building” before he disappeared, then came back and sat down. This
was so suspicious that one of the snipers inside the building took a
photo of the gunman.
Additionally, according to a separate local news station, “a law
enforcement officer had also previously seen Crooks on the ground
and called him in as a suspicious person with a picture before 5:45
p.m.” Officers supposedly looked around but couldn’t immediately
find him.
Just to review: this man was on the radar of the security forces at
the rally 30 _minutes_ before he fired the first shot. And he fired
it on top of the very same building where the police were staged.
Already, 30 minutes before the crime took place, they had enough
reason to detain this guy and delay the rally. But it gets even
worse.
At one point, in full view of the snipers inside the command post,
the gunman, “took out a range finder,” prompting the police
sniper to radio his command post. That meant that he alerted the
Secret Service to the threat. But still, no one detained the man,
and no one pulled Trump off the stage — even though there’s only
one reason a suspicious person would be using a range finder right
outside a Trump rally, and everyone knows what it is. There is no
conceivable innocent reason for a guy to be lurking around the site
of a campaign rally with a range finder. Or if there is an innocent
reason, the innocent reason is significantly less plausible than the
sinister reason. Yet nothing was done. So the man disappeared again,
then came back a third time — this time carrying a backpack. And
once again, the snipers called in to their command post, explaining
that this suspicious man was now “walking towards the back of the
building.” But nobody stopped him. Nobody took any physical action
to prevent what they could evidently see coming.
Apparently, all of these reports prompted some police officers to
call for backup and try to scale the roof to stop the shooter. But
they obviously failed to do so. The gunman climbed on top of the
building using an air conditioning unit — not a ladder as
previously reported — and fired several shots at Trump before he
was taken out.
So what explains why Donald Trump wasn’t taken off the stage at
any point in this process, until a gunman shot him in the head? Why
didn’t Secret Service snipers on the roof behind Trump take out
this shooter before he was able to open fire? If you look at some of
the videos from the rally, you’ll notice that initially, the
snipers behind Trump appear to be relaxed at first. They’re
standing up. They’re not in the prone position, looking through
their rifle scopes. But then, some people in the bleachers see
something. They start pointing. And eventually the Secret Service
snipers go prone, clearly responding to a threat. Here are the two
clips:
https://youtu.be/rm5IFgY_zDA
This is a much more serious failure than we were told it was. This
is not a case of the Secret Service somehow failing to notice the
shooter. They clearly knew he was there, or that some potentially
imminent threat was very close to the stage. We know that from the
video. We know it from the reporting. At a minimum, they had reason
to think that Trump was in imminent danger. But they essentially did
nothing in response. They let Trump take a bullet to the head before
they addressed the threat in any way.
According to the Biden administration, we shouldn’t be outraged or
concerned about any of this. Yesterday, the head of the DHS,
Alejandro Mayorkas, explained that he has “100% confidence” in
the director of the Secret Service (whom he oversees). Watch:
https://youtu.be/SVvpagp1-QI
This is the same Alejandro Mayorkas who claims the border is
completely secure. Now he’s saying he has 100% confidence in the
director of the Secret Service, three days after the Secret Service
allowed the leading presidential candidate to take a head-shot from
a rifle while he delivered a speech on stage. The only conceivable
way you’d have “100 % confidence” in this agency, and the
people who lead it, is if you’re absolutely fine with that
outcome. At this point it’s not really a conspiracy theory to say
that the Biden administration apparently thinks Saturday’s
assassination attempt was acceptable. They’re coming right out and
saying it to our faces. If it was unacceptable, they would fire the
people who allowed it to happen. But they aren’t.
Saying you have 100% confidence in the Secret Service after an
incident like this is like looking out over the wreckage of a
collapsed bridge and declaring that you have a 100% confidence in
the engineering team that designed it. 100% confidence. Not even,
like, 90% confidence, or 73% confidence. Their utter and total and
catastrophic failure has not lost them even one percentage point of
confidence, in your book.
And it’s not just the DHS secretary saying this. Last night, Joe
Biden was asked by Lester Holt about the Director of the Secret
Service. He made it clear he has no problems with the director’s
performance. He also made it clear he has no idea who the director
is, because he said “I’ve heard from him,” even though the
director of the Secret Service is a woman. Watch:
https://youtu.be/uStQ7A2JRsg
So Biden may not be sure who the Director of the Secret Service is.
But he’s sure that he, or she, or whoever, is doing a great job
— as evidenced by the fact that her agents nearly got his chief
political rival killed. And of course, because no one in the Biden
administration has any shame whatsoever, the Secret Service director
has said she has no intention of stepping aside. It’s just like
the pullout from Afghanistan, which directly resulted in the deaths
of several U.S. servicemembers. No one resigned after that debacle.
No one was fired. No one in the government seemed to care, frankly.
And we’re seeing that repeat after the single most significant
security failure by the Secret Service since the attempt on Ronald
Reagan’s life. Actually it’s worse than that. Based on
everything we know now, we can say with a high degree of confidence
that this is the worst security failure by the Secret Service in its
history. But no one in any position of authority in the agency or
outside of it will be held accountable in any way whatsoever.
This is why our system of government has lost all the trust the
public may have once had in it. There’s no sense of accountability
or responsibility. If anything, these people are embracing their
failures — almost as if they wanted them to happen. That means
we’ll never be told the truth about what happened in Butler,
Pennsylvania on Saturday. We’ll never be given the full story of
how it happened. Why this guy was allowed to do this. And who this
guy even is. And even if we are someday given all of this
information, there will be no reason for any of us to believe any of
it.
On 18/7/24 03:05, Matt Walsh wrote:
Seventy-two hours after an assassin shot and nearly killed Donald Trump
in Pennsylvania, here’s the official story so far: A random 20-year-old
acting completely alone walked within 150 yards of a presidential
campaign rally with a rifle, climbed onto a rooftop in full view of
Secret Service snipers, set up his shot and fired without anyone
intervening and with no help from anyone.
Yes, makes no sense, one year on.
In the 1980s every year or two there was a TV program on
the Kennedy assasination in myopic detail
until the major movie was released. Every angle,
reconstructions from towers with moving vehicles etc.
Everyone is scared to look, because he was shot and then
not shot in a time loop? At the Vatican at the funeral
of Pope Francis, President Trump was standing for a while
with his head at 90 degrees, like he was wanting to say
something.
You can't clip the ear without the rest? He lost a shoe
which had laces: high stress and weird things happen.
Was is a misfired round, a richochet, no-one knows?
People say it was staged, whatever that means. As someone did
unforunately die (the off-duty firefighter) investigations
may still be on-going.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 04:10:18 |
| Calls: | 10,386 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,605 |