I've said it before and I'll say it again: Darwin is a myth.
The real Darwin didn't even "believe" in evolution!
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Darwin is a myth.
On 17/8/2025 9:25 am, Thomas Gerald Moog wrote:
Trump's father confessed on his death bed that he'd had repeated anal sex
with his son Donald.
I did not notice that you redirected all replies to other newsgroups:
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.male.military,
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.tv-show, alt.russian.z1
Now I found my replies.
--
@~@ Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
/ v \ May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
/( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
^ ^ https://github.com/changmw/changmw
Ron wrote:
Darwin confeesed on his DEATH BED that he'd had sex with the Pope.
Trump's father confessed on his death bed that he'd had repeated anal sex >with his son Donald.
On 17/8/2025 4:55 am, JTEM wrote:
Darwin did not believe in evolution.
Darwin did NOT believe in evolution!
The jackass believed that if an animal used it's legs a lot, built
up those muscles, then the body would produce "Large leg muscle"
gemmules that traveled to daddy's nut sack and were passed down to
their offspring. The result is that animals would be born with these
larger muscles.
That's not what evolution about. It's a combination genetic mutation and >natural selection!
The animal happened to have lots of leg muscles (GM), which favored its >survival (NS)! Read Wikipedia and Google Search about principles of >evolution.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Darwin is a myth.
The real Darwin didn't even "believe" in evolution!
Oh, I know, you had a different thought driven into your skull
so you refuse to entertain any other idea.
You're such a *Good* dog... Pavlov's Dog...
The communist world under Stalin and later under Mao BANNED
evolution. Yes, you could go to prison for teaching evolution
of basing any science on it.
The Nazis had their "Master Race," very true, but long before
that all of the west had it's Eugenics! And, yes, the communist
world did see this as proof that "evolution" was a western
imperialist plot to enforce some social and economic hierarchy.
But, that hierarchy. Very bad.
But, here's the thing: The communist world would NOT have had
much is any problem with Darwin himself! Because, as I said,
just in case you weren't paying attention; Darwin did NOT
believe in evolution!
Darwin's one and only "Theory" -- if we can call it that, though
technically it was never a "Theory" -- wasn't evolution, it was
PANGENESIS!
Google it, assuming you have computer access...
Darwin, being a complete fraud, a flatulent racist & moron, didn't
entirely come up with this "Pangenesis" idea on his own. In fact,
he came up with NOTHING on his own. Like everything else, he had
plagiarized his pagenesis from "Lamarkism." And when Stalin banned
that oh so imperialistic "Evolution" thing in the communist world,
what he replaced it with was lysenkoism.
NOTE: Lysenkoism was a cheap copy of Lamarkism, just like Darwin's >Pangenesis. So that goddamn idiot Darwin didn't even believe in
evolution! No, he was in full agreement with the people who would
later BAN evolution...
It gets worse.
Darwin's topic wasn't even "Evolution" anyway. He was writing
about COMMON DESCENT. Now this COMMON DESCENT was a very old idea,
Darwin was introduced to it through his grandfather, who was a
notable proponent! But some sources will tell you that COMMON
DESCENT stretches back into ancient times. However far back you
want to put it doesn't matter. What does matter is that you can
place it back well before Darwin AND "Evolution" had always been
a part of it.
THINK: If a goat and a whale share a common ancestor, as COMMON
DESCENT insists, then obviously one or both had to have EVOLVED
a great deal since the time of that common ancestor.
It gets worse.
Google The Mendelian Laws of Inheritance. These would be named
for Gregor Mendel the man who effectively cracked the code of
inheritance. He contacted Darwin, this Mendel, AND Darwin was
exposed to Mendel's work in the literature of the day. And Darwin
was such a goddamn jackass that he dismissed Mendel, or just plain
ignored him AND AFTERWARDS came out with his pseudo scientific
"Pangenesis" crap!
Get it? Darwin was handed the answer, threw it away and came up
with idiocy instead....
It gets worse.
Darwin appears to have "Lost" the communication sent to him by
Mendel. And he seemed to have "Lost" letters sent to him from
Wallace, a man he appears to have stolen much from, including
"Natural Selection."
Yes, Darwin "Lost" the evidence against him...
IT TOOK 20 YEARS FOR THE ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD TO RECOVER
FROM DARWIN!
By becoming the name & face of naturalism, and throwing away
Mendel and his cracking the mystery of inheritance, science lost
20 years! It took that long for the English Speaking world to
discover the science lost to it by Darwin's idiocy...
So Darwin wasn't a great man of science. He wasn't. Darwin was
the enemy of science! Darwin did enormous DAMAGE to science!
Seriously, you honestly believe that if it weren't for Darwin
nobody would have published any books on the origins of species?
READ YOUR DARWIN GOSPELS!
Wallace! Wallace would have still published!
And, again, without Darwin becoming the face of naturalism and
throwing aside Mendel, Mendel's work would likely gained
prominence in the English Speaking world....
There is literally nothing to gain by maintaining the myth of
Darwin. Stop settling. Stop accepting brain manure because some >self-appointed ruling class ordered you to.
On 8/16/25 9:23 PM, Attilia wrote:
JTEM wrote:
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Darwin is a myth.
God is real and he's going to fuck you up good.
All the Abrahammic religions are bullshit invented by ignorant
What on earth are you pretending this to have to do with Darwin,
and why won't you take the psychiatric drugs that have been
prescribed to you?
On 8/16/25 1:08 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
On 16/8/2025 9:29 am, JTEM wrote:
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Darwin is a myth.
The real Darwin didn't even "believe" in evolution!
....
So Darwin wasn't a great man of science. He wasn't. Darwin was
the enemy of science! Darwin did enormous DAMAGE to science!
Seriously, you honestly believe that if it weren't for Darwin
nobody would have published any books on the origins of species?
You can always talk about evolution WITHOUT human names! Just focus on
what he said rather than judging his personalities and characters.
Huh?!?
Did you not read what you're replying to?
Darwin did not believe in evolution.
Darwin did NOT believe in evolution!
The jackass believed that if an animal used it's legs a lot, built
up those muscles, then the body would produce "Large leg muscle"
gemmules that traveled to daddy's nut sack and were passed down to
their offspring. The result is that animals would be born with these
larger muscles.
So my advice to you is to STOP believing everything you're told and
to START investigating things for yourself.
Pangenesis
THAT was Darwin's one and only "Theory," and he came out with it AFTER
Mendel had already come up with the right answer!
On 8/17/25 9:55 AM, Attila wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 21:29:34 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<107omu0$1etcv$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Darwin is a myth.
The real Darwin didn't even "believe" in evolution!
Oh, I know, you had a different thought driven into your skull
so you refuse to entertain any other idea.
You're such a *Good* dog... Pavlov's Dog...
The communist world under Stalin and later under Mao BANNED
evolution. Yes, you could go to prison for teaching evolution
of basing any science on it.
The Nazis had their "Master Race," very true, but long before
that all of the west had it's Eugenics! And, yes, the communist
world did see this as proof that "evolution" was a western
imperialist plot to enforce some social and economic hierarchy.
But, that hierarchy. Very bad.
But, here's the thing: The communist world would NOT have had
much is any problem with Darwin himself! Because, as I said,
just in case you weren't paying attention; Darwin did NOT
believe in evolution!
Darwin's one and only "Theory" -- if we can call it that, though
technically it was never a "Theory" -- wasn't evolution, it was
PANGENESIS!
Google it, assuming you have computer access...
Darwin, being a complete fraud, a flatulent racist & moron, didn't
entirely come up with this "Pangenesis" idea on his own. In fact,
he came up with NOTHING on his own. Like everything else, he had
plagiarized his pagenesis from "Lamarkism." And when Stalin banned
that oh so imperialistic "Evolution" thing in the communist world,
what he replaced it with was lysenkoism.
NOTE: Lysenkoism was a cheap copy of Lamarkism, just like Darwin's
Pangenesis. So that goddamn idiot Darwin didn't even believe in
evolution! No, he was in full agreement with the people who would
later BAN evolution...
It gets worse.
Darwin's topic wasn't even "Evolution" anyway. He was writing
about COMMON DESCENT. Now this COMMON DESCENT was a very old idea,
Darwin was introduced to it through his grandfather, who was a
notable proponent! But some sources will tell you that COMMON
DESCENT stretches back into ancient times. However far back you
want to put it doesn't matter. What does matter is that you can
place it back well before Darwin AND "Evolution" had always been
a part of it.
THINK: If a goat and a whale share a common ancestor, as COMMON
DESCENT insists, then obviously one or both had to have EVOLVED
a great deal since the time of that common ancestor.
It gets worse.
Google The Mendelian Laws of Inheritance. These would be named
for Gregor Mendel the man who effectively cracked the code of
inheritance. He contacted Darwin, this Mendel, AND Darwin was
exposed to Mendel's work in the literature of the day. And Darwin
was such a goddamn jackass that he dismissed Mendel, or just plain
ignored him AND AFTERWARDS came out with his pseudo scientific
"Pangenesis" crap!
Get it? Darwin was handed the answer, threw it away and came up
with idiocy instead....
It gets worse.
Darwin appears to have "Lost" the communication sent to him by
Mendel. And he seemed to have "Lost" letters sent to him from
Wallace, a man he appears to have stolen much from, including
"Natural Selection."
Yes, Darwin "Lost" the evidence against him...
IT TOOK 20 YEARS FOR THE ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD TO RECOVER
FROM DARWIN!
By becoming the name & face of naturalism, and throwing away
Mendel and his cracking the mystery of inheritance, science lost
20 years! It took that long for the English Speaking world to
discover the science lost to it by Darwin's idiocy...
So Darwin wasn't a great man of science. He wasn't. Darwin was
the enemy of science! Darwin did enormous DAMAGE to science!
Seriously, you honestly believe that if it weren't for Darwin
nobody would have published any books on the origins of species?
READ YOUR DARWIN GOSPELS!
Wallace! Wallace would have still published!
And, again, without Darwin becoming the face of naturalism and
throwing aside Mendel, Mendel's work would likely gained
prominence in the English Speaking world....
There is literally nothing to gain by maintaining the myth of
Darwin. Stop settling. Stop accepting brain manure because some
self-appointed ruling class ordered you to.
Yet evolution is an integral part of a number of sciences.
Why the "Yet?" The topic isn't evolution, it's Darwin. Darwin is
a myth. What you think you know about Darwin is a falsehood.
I
will go along with that rather than the occasional idiot who
writes long and useless dialogs trying to prove differently.
You need to Google the term: Reading Comprehension.
Under the circumstances, the results are not promising but
you would gain points for the effort.
On 8/17/25 3:55 PM, Attila wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 16:55:04 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<107qr78$1tvu3$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
On 8/16/25 1:08 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
On 16/8/2025 9:29 am, JTEM wrote:
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Darwin is a myth.
The real Darwin didn't even "believe" in evolution!
....
So Darwin wasn't a great man of science. He wasn't. Darwin was
the enemy of science! Darwin did enormous DAMAGE to science!
Seriously, you honestly believe that if it weren't for Darwin
nobody would have published any books on the origins of species?
You can always talk about evolution WITHOUT human names! Just focus on >>>> what he said rather than judging his personalities and characters.
Huh?!?
Did you not read what you're replying to?
Darwin did not believe in evolution.
Darwin did NOT believe in evolution!
The jackass believed that if an animal used it's legs a lot, built
up those muscles, then the body would produce "Large leg muscle"
gemmules that traveled to daddy's nut sack and were passed down to
their offspring. The result is that animals would be born with these
larger muscles.
So my advice to you is to STOP believing everything you're told and
to START investigating things for yourself.
Pangenesis
THAT was Darwin's one and only "Theory," and he came out with it AFTER
Mendel had already come up with the right answer!
Evolution exists.
So does reading comprehension, even if not for you.
Topic isn't evolution, and it certainly never was for Darwin. The topic
is Darwin, who never believed in evolution.
On 8/17/25 4:07 PM, Attila wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 10:21:16 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<107sogt$2bbjn$4@dont-email.me> wrote:
On 8/17/25 9:55 AM, Attila wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 21:29:34 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<107omu0$1etcv$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Darwin is a myth.
The real Darwin didn't even "believe" in evolution!
Oh, I know, you had a different thought driven into your skull
so you refuse to entertain any other idea.
You're such a *Good* dog... Pavlov's Dog...
The communist world under Stalin and later under Mao BANNED
evolution. Yes, you could go to prison for teaching evolution
of basing any science on it.
The Nazis had their "Master Race," very true, but long before
that all of the west had it's Eugenics! And, yes, the communist
world did see this as proof that "evolution" was a western
imperialist plot to enforce some social and economic hierarchy.
But, that hierarchy. Very bad.
But, here's the thing: The communist world would NOT have had
much is any problem with Darwin himself! Because, as I said,
just in case you weren't paying attention; Darwin did NOT
believe in evolution!
Darwin's one and only "Theory" -- if we can call it that, though
technically it was never a "Theory" -- wasn't evolution, it was
PANGENESIS!
Google it, assuming you have computer access...
Darwin, being a complete fraud, a flatulent racist & moron, didn't
entirely come up with this "Pangenesis" idea on his own. In fact,
he came up with NOTHING on his own. Like everything else, he had
plagiarized his pagenesis from "Lamarkism." And when Stalin banned
that oh so imperialistic "Evolution" thing in the communist world,
what he replaced it with was lysenkoism.
NOTE: Lysenkoism was a cheap copy of Lamarkism, just like Darwin's
Pangenesis. So that goddamn idiot Darwin didn't even believe in
evolution! No, he was in full agreement with the people who would
later BAN evolution...
It gets worse.
Darwin's topic wasn't even "Evolution" anyway. He was writing
about COMMON DESCENT. Now this COMMON DESCENT was a very old idea,
Darwin was introduced to it through his grandfather, who was a
notable proponent! But some sources will tell you that COMMON
DESCENT stretches back into ancient times. However far back you
want to put it doesn't matter. What does matter is that you can
place it back well before Darwin AND "Evolution" had always been
a part of it.
THINK: If a goat and a whale share a common ancestor, as COMMON
DESCENT insists, then obviously one or both had to have EVOLVED
a great deal since the time of that common ancestor.
It gets worse.
Google The Mendelian Laws of Inheritance. These would be named
for Gregor Mendel the man who effectively cracked the code of
inheritance. He contacted Darwin, this Mendel, AND Darwin was
exposed to Mendel's work in the literature of the day. And Darwin
was such a goddamn jackass that he dismissed Mendel, or just plain
ignored him AND AFTERWARDS came out with his pseudo scientific
"Pangenesis" crap!
Get it? Darwin was handed the answer, threw it away and came up
with idiocy instead....
It gets worse.
Darwin appears to have "Lost" the communication sent to him by
Mendel. And he seemed to have "Lost" letters sent to him from
Wallace, a man he appears to have stolen much from, including
"Natural Selection."
Yes, Darwin "Lost" the evidence against him...
IT TOOK 20 YEARS FOR THE ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD TO RECOVER
FROM DARWIN!
By becoming the name & face of naturalism, and throwing away
Mendel and his cracking the mystery of inheritance, science lost
20 years! It took that long for the English Speaking world to
discover the science lost to it by Darwin's idiocy...
So Darwin wasn't a great man of science. He wasn't. Darwin was
the enemy of science! Darwin did enormous DAMAGE to science!
Seriously, you honestly believe that if it weren't for Darwin
nobody would have published any books on the origins of species?
READ YOUR DARWIN GOSPELS!
Wallace! Wallace would have still published!
And, again, without Darwin becoming the face of naturalism and
throwing aside Mendel, Mendel's work would likely gained
prominence in the English Speaking world....
There is literally nothing to gain by maintaining the myth of
Darwin. Stop settling. Stop accepting brain manure because some
self-appointed ruling class ordered you to.
Yet evolution is an integral part of a number of sciences.
Why the "Yet?" The topic isn't evolution, it's Darwin. Darwin is
a myth. What you think you know about Darwin is a falsehood.
Who cares?
You want to know who cares what the topic is? Well. Supposedly you
do. I do else I would never have brought it up.
He was a methodical biologist
Darwin? Wtf?!?!?
You're trolling. You can't possibly be *This* clueless! You're
trolling.
On 8/17/25 8:12 PM, Attila wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 16:18:11 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<107tde5$2im6m$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
On 8/17/25 3:55 PM, Attila wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 16:55:04 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<107qr78$1tvu3$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
On 8/16/25 1:08 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
On 16/8/2025 9:29 am, JTEM wrote:
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Darwin is a myth.
The real Darwin didn't even "believe" in evolution!
....
So Darwin wasn't a great man of science. He wasn't. Darwin was
the enemy of science! Darwin did enormous DAMAGE to science!
Seriously, you honestly believe that if it weren't for Darwin
nobody would have published any books on the origins of species?
You can always talk about evolution WITHOUT human names! Just focus on >>>>>> what he said rather than judging his personalities and characters.
Huh?!?
Did you not read what you're replying to?
Darwin did not believe in evolution.
Darwin did NOT believe in evolution!
The jackass believed that if an animal used it's legs a lot, built
up those muscles, then the body would produce "Large leg muscle"
gemmules that traveled to daddy's nut sack and were passed down to
their offspring. The result is that animals would be born with these >>>>> larger muscles.
So my advice to you is to STOP believing everything you're told and
to START investigating things for yourself.
Pangenesis
THAT was Darwin's one and only "Theory," and he came out with it AFTER >>>>> Mendel had already come up with the right answer!
Evolution exists.
So does reading comprehension, even if not for you.
Topic isn't evolution, and it certainly never was for Darwin. The topic
is Darwin, who never believed in evolution.
Who cares?
You do. Which is why you keep replying. If you didn't care you wouldn't
even take notice, much less involve yourself.
Effort follows interest.
On 8/18/25 5:08 AM, Attila wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 22:01:09 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<107u1h5$2nv09$2@dont-email.me> wrote:
On 8/17/25 8:12 PM, Attila wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 16:18:11 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<107tde5$2im6m$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
On 8/17/25 3:55 PM, Attila wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 16:55:04 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
<107qr78$1tvu3$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
On 8/16/25 1:08 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
On 16/8/2025 9:29 am, JTEM wrote:Huh?!?
You can always talk about evolution WITHOUT human names! Just focus on >>>>>>>> what he said rather than judging his personalities and characters. >>>>>>>
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Darwin is a myth. >>>>>>>>>
The real Darwin didn't even "believe" in evolution!
....
So Darwin wasn't a great man of science. He wasn't. Darwin was >>>>>>>>> the enemy of science! Darwin did enormous DAMAGE to science! >>>>>>>>>
Seriously, you honestly believe that if it weren't for Darwin >>>>>>>>> nobody would have published any books on the origins of species? >>>>>>>
Did you not read what you're replying to?
Darwin did not believe in evolution.
Darwin did NOT believe in evolution!
The jackass believed that if an animal used it's legs a lot, built >>>>>>> up those muscles, then the body would produce "Large leg muscle" >>>>>>> gemmules that traveled to daddy's nut sack and were passed down to >>>>>>> their offspring. The result is that animals would be born with these >>>>>>> larger muscles.
So my advice to you is to STOP believing everything you're told and >>>>>>> to START investigating things for yourself.
Pangenesis
THAT was Darwin's one and only "Theory," and he came out with it AFTER >>>>>>> Mendel had already come up with the right answer!
Evolution exists.
So does reading comprehension, even if not for you.
Topic isn't evolution, and it certainly never was for Darwin. The topic >>>>> is Darwin, who never believed in evolution.
Who cares?
You do. Which is why you keep replying. If you didn't care you wouldn't
even take notice, much less involve yourself.
Effort follows interest.
Or I was bored and dislike people like you who like word
games.
It's not a word game. In fact, I attack YOU and your fundamentalist
religious adherence to the written word. Instead, I focus on the
application of ideas.
Darwin's one theory was called pangenesis, and it was in agreement with,
not opposed to, those who REJECTED and even OUTLAWED evolution.
Darwin was such a fucking idiot that he produced this pangenesis AFTER
Mendel had figured out inheritance and even contacted Darwin! Darwin
was such a fraud that he ignored Mendel and came out with pseudo
scientific pangenesis IN COMPETITION WITH Mendel's work.
On 8/18/25 2:42 PM, Attila wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 12:58:33 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
It's not a word game. In fact, I attack YOU and your fundamentalist
religious adherence to the written word. Instead, I focus on the
application of ideas.
That is amusing considering I have been an atheist all my
live. My position on religion
You're an idiot but I'll explain... though it's impossible that
you might get it.
Your feeble brain works EXACTLY the same way as any Christian
fundamentalist. There's is ZERO distinction. They use it on
the bible, you use it on whatever you mistaken for "Science" or
whatever it is you pretend to be protecting.
Darwin did NOT believe in evolution. Everything you think you
know about Darwin is a myth. You religiously and quite devoutly
believe in a fictional character.
Darwin was such a fucking idiot that he produced this pangenesis AFTER
Mendel had figured out inheritance and even contacted Darwin! Darwin
was such a fraud that he ignored Mendel and came out with pseudo
scientific pangenesis IN COMPETITION WITH Mendel's work.
Again, it doesn't matter.
Of course it matters. It matters a lot. Darwin is a cancer on science.
In a field where accuracy is all important, Darwin in a study in lies.
He's a myth. The man as he is passed down to us is entirely fictional.
Yes it matters if your poster child for evolutionary biology is a
bogus lie.
It really does matter if men who want to be taken seriously dogmatically >advance myths. It matters if men who want to speak with the authority
of empirical reality promote a fairy tale.
On 8/18/2025 10:42 PM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/18/25 8:44 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/18/2025 12:37 PM, JTEM wrote:
I know this. And Darwin AND YOU group with these people,
believing
what you always heard and never challenging or testing.
No way! Here was the prevailing view prior to Darwin:
Darwin's grandfather was probably the biggest proponent of
common descent in his day. Darwin was simply regurgitating
what he was raised with.
Darwin never looked forward, as an idiot who simply accepted
what was told, he always looked backwards. This is how he
could believe in such idiocy as his pangenesis. He plagiarized
lamarck! That's all. And even Lamarck was hardly a trail
blazer himself! It was all well tred ground...
This is exactly like you:Â Not educated but trained like one
of Pavlov's Dogs! The absolute easiest thing in the world
would be to look at a myth such as Darwin and saying, "Yeah.
What we are taught about Darwin is a myth. The jackass didn't
even believe in evolution!"
Well it would be easy if you didn't merely accept what was
handed to you....
Darwin's original idea was evolution by natural selection, an
idea that he developed over the course of a few decades. Alfred
Russel Wallace discovered the similar idea over the course of a
few hours, wrote it up and sent his manuscript across the World
(Wallace was in southeast Asia at the time) to Darwin! It was
Darwin's friends, Charles Lyell and Joseph Hooker, who arranged
for both Darwin and Wallace's papers to be published
simultaneously with a reading at the Linnean Society.
On 8/22/25 12:21 PM, jojo wrote:
did wallace do any field work?
If only there was some means to "Research" these things from your
desktop or phone... SAY! We could do something, connect computers,
make a "Network" of computers... call it the internetwork of
something! "The World Wide Internetwork." Enact some protocols,
"WWI."
What do you think?
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/22/2025 12:42 PM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/22/25 7:04 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
No, as I just posted here a moment ago, Darwin's original
idea was evolution by natural selection.
You're embarrassingly wrong, of course.
Darwin never once suffered an original idea in his life. His
original
TOPIC was common descent. He was defending his grandfather's
legacy
against upstarts like Wallace. IT WAS WALLACE who came up with
the
concept of natural selection.
Ironically, evolution had always been a part of common
descent, even
in ancient times, and Darwin was such a fraud that he never even
noticed, much less understood the concept...
Darwin didn't believe in evolution. He was in full agreement with
those who would later BAN and even OUTLAW evolution in the
communist
world. This wasn't a brain fart. No, even 20 years later
Darwin had
not recognized and corrected his idiocy.
Darwin is a myth.
You are faith based, dogmatically clinging to your holy
gospels of
Darwin.
Where and when did the phrase "natural selection" first
appear?! This is NOT a question of science but of etymology.
you're having a ocd episode
On 8/22/25 1:44 PM, jojo wrote:
you dont understand, i treat posting here the same as talking
to someone face to face.
So when you're online you pretend that you're not?
Not too long ago I had dinner and across from me was
a 10 year old boy. I said something about The Great
Oxidation event and the kid jumped in -- "Is that
true?"
He actually posed the question to the person next
to me. I pointed out that he had a phone in his hand
and he could Google it. And he responded just like
you, pretending that it was more intelligent to ignore
the means to verify information for himself and
depend on others when...
No. Only kidding. The kid instantly Googled it, came
back and corrected my dating.
So my point here is that you've got a ways to go before
you achieve the stature of a 10 year old boy.
Congratulations.
On 8/20/25 8:34 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
I have read the Origin.
No you don't. Remember: You're pretending to NOT be a religious >fundamentalist.
Without actually reading Darwin's original works, I cannot follow your >>challenge against Mr. Charles Darwin (the Inquisitor?).
What on God's green earth, other than some crippling mental
disorder, would cause you to believe -- INSIST -- that I
never read anything from Darwin?!?!?
On 8/21/25 12:31 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Honey,
You have a fatal flaw in your argument, and here it is:
EVERYONE MARGINALIZED MENDEL, INCLUDING, MENDEL HIMSELF.
When you were a young child twat -- a Twatling -- did you
care giver ever say to you something like; "If everybody
else jumped off a bridge would you?"
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/18/2025 10:42 PM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/18/25 8:44 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/18/2025 12:37 PM, JTEM wrote:
I know this. And Darwin AND YOU group with these people,
believing
what you always heard and never challenging or testing.
No way! Here was the prevailing view prior to Darwin:
Darwin's grandfather was probably the biggest proponent of
common descent in his day. Darwin was simply regurgitating
what he was raised with.
Darwin never looked forward, as an idiot who simply accepted
what was told, he always looked backwards. This is how he
could believe in such idiocy as his pangenesis. He plagiarized
lamarck! That's all. And even Lamarck was hardly a trail
blazer himself! It was all well tred ground...
This is exactly like you: Not educated but trained like one
of Pavlov's Dogs! The absolute easiest thing in the world
would be to look at a myth such as Darwin and saying, "Yeah.
What we are taught about Darwin is a myth. The jackass didn't
even believe in evolution!"
Well it would be easy if you didn't merely accept what was
handed to you....
Darwin's original idea was evolution by natural selection, an
idea that he developed over the course of a few decades. Alfred
Russel Wallace discovered the similar idea over the course of a
few hours, wrote it up and sent his manuscript across the World
(Wallace was in southeast Asia at the time) to Darwin! It was
Darwin's friends, Charles Lyell and Joseph Hooker, who arranged
for both Darwin and Wallace's papers to be published
simultaneously with a reading at the Linnean Society.
did wallace do any field work? if not, no credits for him.
On 8/23/25 9:00 PM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 12:00:40 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/19/25 11:04 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
No, I am not faith.
Of course you are. You're simply not self aware...
[Snip of you PROVING your religious devotion to what you claim Darwin >>believed.]
I wish I could hold as much faith in something, ANYTHING, as you
do with your dogmatic beliefs about Darwin. I really do.
You do. You're blind to the obvious even as you see the invisible
with absolute clarity: Pure faith!
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 20:25:23 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/20/25 7:56 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/20/2025 11:10 AM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/20/25 8:34 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
I have read the Origin.
No you don't. Remember: You're pretending to NOT be a religious
fundamentalist. Instead of INTERPRETING the words of Darwin,
just look at what he did!
Look at how he /Applied/ his beliefs.
AFTER Origins was published he gained prominence, he was contact
by Mendel with his findings, Darwin was exposed to Mendel's work
in literature that he owned AND THEN he produced the pseudo
scientific idiocy that is pangenesis.
Pangenesis, as I already pointed out, was nothing more than a
variation on lamarckism and totally in line with the lysenkoism
that the communist world produced as a replacement for the
OUTLAWED "Theory of Evolution."
So, don't read Origins, go read about Lamarckism, pangenesis
and lysenkoism. Google Stalin and his ban on evolution.
Done.
WHAT DID DARWIN ACTUALLY BELIEVE AND PUT INTO WORDS __AFTER__
ORIGINS?
Pangenesis.
Is pangenesis "Evolution?"
No.
The phrase that Darwin used for "evolution" was "descent with
modification".
"Transmutation."
Just out of pure curiosity
Are you actually pretending to NOT be a religious fundamentalist?!?!?
You need someone to tell you what to think?!?!?
can you name a single scholar who agrees
with you??
Can you name a single scholar who DISAGREES with the fact that
Darwin's "Theory" was pangenesis, that's Stalin & Mao OUTLAWED
evolution and adopted lysenkoism, which was nothing more than
a flavor of the same lamarckism that Darwin plagiarized?
I wish I could have the religious faith about anything that you
PROVE you have regarding your belief regarding Darwin. Your faith is
so strong, you MUST remove parts of comments that are in opposition to
it.
You will, of course, run away from the truth, or attempt to
divert from it. You don't really have a choice.
On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:43:31 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/21/25 12:31 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Honey,
You have a fatal flaw in your argument, and here it is:
EVERYONE MARGINALIZED MENDEL, INCLUDING, MENDEL HIMSELF.
When you were a young child twat -- a Twatling -- did you
care giver ever say to you something like; "If everybody
else jumped off a bridge would you?"
Your misogynic anger serves to PROVE Dawn rattled your cage.
This, in turn, PROVES you lost.
Whine and cry about this truth as much as you need. I will merely
laugh at your further proving you lost. Again.
Or is that still?
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:21:58 +0000, jojo <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/18/2025 10:42 PM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/18/25 8:44 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/18/2025 12:37 PM, JTEM wrote:
I know this. And Darwin AND YOU group with these people,
believing
what you always heard and never challenging or testing.
No way! Here was the prevailing view prior to Darwin:
Darwin's grandfather was probably the biggest proponent of
common descent in his day. Darwin was simply regurgitating
what he was raised with.
Darwin never looked forward, as an idiot who simply accepted
what was told, he always looked backwards. This is how he
could believe in such idiocy as his pangenesis. He plagiarized
lamarck! That's all. And even Lamarck was hardly a trail
blazer himself! It was all well tred ground...
This is exactly like you:Â Not educated but trained like one
of Pavlov's Dogs! The absolute easiest thing in the world
would be to look at a myth such as Darwin and saying, "Yeah.
What we are taught about Darwin is a myth. The jackass didn't
even believe in evolution!"
Well it would be easy if you didn't merely accept what was
handed to you....
Darwin's original idea was evolution by natural selection, an
idea that he developed over the course of a few decades. Alfred
Russel Wallace discovered the similar idea over the course of a
few hours, wrote it up and sent his manuscript across the World
(Wallace was in southeast Asia at the time) to Darwin! It was
Darwin's friends, Charles Lyell and Joseph Hooker, who arranged
for both Darwin and Wallace's papers to be published
simultaneously with a reading at the Linnean Society.
did wallace do any field work? if not, no credits for him.
He did.
If you wish to learn more about Wallace, you can read the
following at your leisure:
https://evolution.berkeley.edu/the-history-of-evolutionary-thought/1800s/natural-selection-charles-darwin-alfred-russel-wallace/
https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/alfred-wallace/
There are many more site you can read, if you wish, of course.
These are just two of many that detail his part in the theory of
evolution.
On 24/8/2025 10:59 am, JTEM wrote:
Pangenesis
Lamarckism
lysenkoism
All you need is reading comprehension and a rudimentary
ability to deconstruct a problem & propose a test.
I failed to recall these 3 words, though I haven't reviewed my
biology books.
I dunno how you came across them.... likely not from textbooks.
But then biology is now part of a bigger field called life
science. :)
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Darwin is a myth.
On 8/24/25 12:13 PM, jojo wrote:
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
On 24/8/2025 10:59 am, JTEM wrote:
Pangenesis
Lamarckism
lysenkoism
All you need is reading comprehension and a rudimentary
ability to deconstruct a problem & propose a test.
I failed to recall these 3 words, though I haven't reviewed my
biology books.
I dunno how you came across them.... likely not from
textbooks. But then biology is now part of a bigger field
called life science. :)
even bigger, organic chemistry.
Even bigger:Â Google!
Nobody believs that you consulted a textbook or that you even own
one.
Googling is too much for you!
Google the terms. Don't ask what someone who isn't Darwin said,
go read
what said said!
On 8/24/25 12:18 PM, jojo wrote:
i found that comment from jtem very crude and unbecoming of a
person of science.
Nobody here is a person of science. Nobody can deconstruct a
problem,
pose a test. Nobody. If anyone could, nobody would be trying to
"Argue"
with me, they're be arguing the facts.
Yes, I get nothing but twats acting twattie...
On 8/23/25 9:00 PM, Kenito Benito wrote:
If you didn't publish such in a peer-reviewed
Stop trolling, you mentally unhinged twat.
Pot, kettle, black much, troll?
Telling the twat collective to STOP trolling
Kenito Benito wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:43:31 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/21/25 12:31 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Honey,
You have a fatal flaw in your argument, and here it is:
EVERYONE MARGINALIZED MENDEL, INCLUDING, MENDEL HIMSELF.
When you were a young child twat -- a Twatling -- did you
care giver ever say to you something like; "If everybody
else jumped off a bridge would you?"
Your misogynic anger serves to PROVE Dawn rattled your cage.
This, in turn, PROVES you lost.
Whine and cry about this truth as much as you need. I will merely
laugh at your further proving you lost. Again.
Or is that still?
i found that comment from jtem very crude and unbecoming of a
person of science.
On 8/23/25 9:01 PM, Kenito Benito wrote:
Your misogynic anger serves to PROVE Dawn rattled your cage.
This, in turn, PROVES you lost.
Whine and cry about this truth as much as you need. I will merely >>laugh at your further proving you lost. Again.
Or is that still?
Yeah, everything is about me.
Kenito Benito wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:21:58 +0000, jojo <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/18/2025 10:42 PM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/18/25 8:44 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/18/2025 12:37 PM, JTEM wrote:
I know this. And Darwin AND YOU group with these people,
believing
what you always heard and never challenging or testing.
No way! Here was the prevailing view prior to Darwin:
Darwin's grandfather was probably the biggest proponent of
common descent in his day. Darwin was simply regurgitating
what he was raised with.
Darwin never looked forward, as an idiot who simply accepted
what was told, he always looked backwards. This is how he
could believe in such idiocy as his pangenesis. He plagiarized
lamarck! That's all. And even Lamarck was hardly a trail
blazer himself! It was all well tred ground...
This is exactly like you: Not educated but trained like one
of Pavlov's Dogs! The absolute easiest thing in the world
would be to look at a myth such as Darwin and saying, "Yeah.
What we are taught about Darwin is a myth. The jackass didn't
even believe in evolution!"
Well it would be easy if you didn't merely accept what was
handed to you....
Darwin's original idea was evolution by natural selection, an
idea that he developed over the course of a few decades. Alfred
Russel Wallace discovered the similar idea over the course of a
few hours, wrote it up and sent his manuscript across the World
(Wallace was in southeast Asia at the time) to Darwin! It was
Darwin's friends, Charles Lyell and Joseph Hooker, who arranged
for both Darwin and Wallace's papers to be published
simultaneously with a reading at the Linnean Society.
did wallace do any field work? if not, no credits for him.
He did.
If you wish to learn more about Wallace, you can read the
following at your leisure:
https://evolution.berkeley.edu/the-history-of-evolutionary-thought/1800s/natural-selection-charles-darwin-alfred-russel-wallace/
https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/alfred-wallace/
There are many more site you can read, if you wish, of course.
These are just two of many that detail his part in the theory of
evolution.
thanks, it will be at my leisure.
i found that comment from jtem very crude and unbecoming of a person of
science.
Nobody here is a person of science.
On 8/24/25 9:31 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
It is so typical of JTEM to
snip
This is about Darwin, not what Freud said about Castration
Complexes as you display.
On 8/24/25 9:31 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
It is so typical of JTEM to
snip
This is about Darwin, not what Freud said about Castration
Complexes as you display.
Darwin did not believe in evolution. Period. He believed in
pseudo scientific nonsense call "pangenesis" which actually
grouped him with those who banned -- OUTLAWED -- evolution.
On 8/25/25 1:45 AM, jojo wrote:
i would define a person of science as anyone who defers to the
scientific method
Which certainly wasn't Darwin.
Didn't you pretend to have read Darwin? WHAT excuse for a "Test," an "Experiment" did you imagine he performed in an attempt to falsify
the bullshit he was spewing?
Then man argued "Logic" and I put it in quote because it was far
from
logical. It was what passed for logical in his mind.
He wasn't a scientist. He failed the basics.
Plus he just didn't believe in evolution. Yes he did eventually use
the term, BUT THAT JUST MAKES IT WORSE! I mean,
misusing/misunderstanding the word "Evolution" makes him a BIGGER
IDIOT, not less of one...
If you're faith based, clinging to mythology out of faith -- the
Darwin myth -- you are religious.
On 8/25/2025 12:50 AM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/23/25 11:26 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Who cares
You do. You certainly spent a lot of time obsessing over me
on this topic. You obviously care a great deal. And you care
about avoiding knowledge at all cost! It's uber important
to you.
Again, your actions reveal this...
Darwin is a myth. You've been lied to your whole life. You've
fallen for it your whole life! They fooled you your whole life.
And THAT is what you can't handle. If they can fool you so
easily, make you believe a fairy tale is "Science" then how
many more times have they made a fool out of you?
LOTS!
Hey, don't enlighten just me and those of us on alt.atheism!
Write a book, and enlighten the whole World!! Or, better yet, go
to this article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_evolutionary_thought
and "fight the good fight," convince others and win the ensuing
edit war, and please, come back here and let us know!
Dawn
On 8/25/25 1:38 AM, jojo wrote:
i'll be honest, i dont really care that much about darwin or
wallce.
Nor the integrity of science, it seems.
On 8/25/2025 8:04 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in
news:108gkue$36kvf$4@dont-email.me:
On 8/24/25 9:31 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
      It is so typical of JTEM to
snip
This is about Darwin, not what Freud said about Castration
Complexes as you display.
     No, this is about you snipping
out entire conversations when they
prove you wrong or you cannot answer
a question.
     That is why so few people bother
responding to you.
It's hard to know who we're dealing with here sometimes. I would
really need to know JTEM's age before recommending therapy, loss
of Internet privileges, grounding, a paddling, etc.
Dawn
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in news:108gkue$36kvf$4@dont-email.me:
On 8/24/25 9:31 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
It is so typical of JTEM to
snip
This is about Darwin, not what Freud said about Castration
Complexes as you display.
No, this is about you snipping
out entire conversations when they
prove you wrong or you cannot answer
a question.
That is why so few people bother
responding to you.
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/25/2025 12:50 AM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/23/25 11:26 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Who cares
You do. You certainly spent a lot of time obsessing over me
on this topic. You obviously care a great deal. And you care
about avoiding knowledge at all cost! It's uber important
to you.
Again, your actions reveal this...
Darwin is a myth. You've been lied to your whole life. You've
fallen for it your whole life! They fooled you your whole life.
And THAT is what you can't handle. If they can fool you so
easily, make you believe a fairy tale is "Science" then how
many more times have they made a fool out of you?
LOTS!
Hey, don't enlighten just me and those of us on alt.atheism!
Write a book, and enlighten the whole World!! Or, better yet, go
to this article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_evolutionary_thought
and "fight the good fight," convince others and win the ensuing
edit war, and please, come back here and let us know!
Dawn
there are many websites where you can publish your own book.. i
think amazon has a thing kinda like that, not sure.
On 8/25/2025 10:47 PM, jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/25/2025 8:04 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in
news:108gkue$36kvf$4@dont-email.me:
On 8/24/25 9:31 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
      It is so typical of JTEM to
snip
This is about Darwin, not what Freud said about Castration
Complexes as you display.
     No, this is about you snipping
out entire conversations when they
prove you wrong or you cannot answer
a question.
     That is why so few people bother
responding to you.
It's hard to know who we're dealing with here sometimes. I
would really need to know JTEM's age before recommending
therapy, loss of Internet privileges, grounding, a paddling, etc.
Dawn
jtem is probably 10, he told me about his friend the other day
who was also 10.
He certainly acts like it! If he was my kiddo, his Internet
would be gone, and if he went around me, he would feel it, and we
would "rinse & repeat" as often as was necessary. (From my
experience, the first round usually does the trick; if not that,
the second.)
Dawn
JTEM wrote:
On 8/25/25 11:44 PM, jojo wrote:
JTEM wrote:
On 8/25/25 1:38 AM, jojo wrote:
i'll be honest, i dont really care that much about darwin or
wallce.
Nor the integrity of science, it seems.
i am a person of science, fyi.
And yet care not a wit for the integrity of science.
Darwin is a myth. It's fraud. People are taught a myth.
i think we can separate the science from the personality, yea?
its not politics.
On 8/25/25 11:44 PM, jojo wrote:
JTEM wrote:
On 8/25/25 1:38 AM, jojo wrote:
i'll be honest, i dont really care that much about darwin or
wallce.
Nor the integrity of science, it seems.
i am a person of science, fyi.
And yet care not a wit for the integrity of science.
Darwin is a myth. It's fraud. People are taught a myth.
On 8/26/2025 7:04 PM, jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/25/2025 10:47 PM, jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/25/2025 8:04 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in
news:108gkue$36kvf$4@dont-email.me:
On 8/24/25 9:31 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
      It is so typical of JTEM to
snip
This is about Darwin, not what Freud said about Castration
Complexes as you display.
     No, this is about you snipping
out entire conversations when they
prove you wrong or you cannot answer
a question.
     That is why so few people bother
responding to you.
It's hard to know who we're dealing with here sometimes. I
would really need to know JTEM's age before recommending
therapy, loss of Internet privileges, grounding, a paddling,
etc.
Dawn
jtem is probably 10, he told me about his friend the other
day who was also 10.
He certainly acts like it! If he was my kiddo, his Internet
would be gone, and if he went around me, he would feel it, and
we would "rinse & repeat" as often as was necessary. (From my
experience, the first round usually does the trick; if not
that, the second.)
Dawn
taking away internet is cruel.
No, it is not! Usenet is for adults; as such, children & teens
should not, IMO, be posting here!!
Dawn
jojo wrote:
JTEM wrote:
On 8/25/25 11:44 PM, jojo wrote:
JTEM wrote:
On 8/25/25 1:38 AM, jojo wrote:
i'll be honest, i dont really care that much about darwin or
wallce.
Nor the integrity of science, it seems.
i am a person of science, fyi.
And yet care not a wit for the integrity of science.
Darwin is a myth. It's fraud. People are taught a myth.
i think we can separate the science from the personality, yea?
its not politics.
oh mr. chan already mentioned that, i would add, with evolution
we are far closer to the truth than any man-god made books.
On 8/26/2025 8:35 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
jojo <f00@0f0.00f> wrote in news:e3666af7-9fbc-508a-5f15-
f7f321cc431d@shinku.aoyagi.konjou:
jojo wrote:
JTEM wrote:
On 8/25/25 11:44 PM, jojo wrote:
JTEM wrote:
On 8/25/25 1:38 AM, jojo wrote:
i'll be honest, i dont really care that much about darwin or
wallce.
Nor the integrity of science, it seems.
i am a person of science, fyi.
And yet care not a wit for the integrity of science.
Darwin is a myth. It's fraud. People are taught a myth.
i think we can separate the science from the personality, yea?
its not politics.
oh mr. chan already mentioned that, i would add, with evolution
we are far closer to the truth than any man-god made books.
   There is a Nobel Prize waiting for anyone
who produces an alternative theory to Darwin
with proof.
Excellent point! Hopefully, "Mom" will take away JTEM's Internet
soon, and we can all enjoy a little more peace here for at least
a few months.
On 8/26/25 8:06 PM, jojo wrote:
i think we can separate the science from the personality, yea?
The "Science" you learn from the schools, the same schools that
preach mythology and order you to believe that it's science.
We have to purge the schools of idiocy. They are NOT supposed
to make students dumber.
On 8/25/25 9:04 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
No, this is about you snipping
No. Your sexual inadequacies are independent of me or anything
I say. This is about the fact that everything you believe about
Darwin is a myth. You have been fooled.
Darwin's topic was "Common Descent." It wasn't his idea. It was
a very old idea, many sources date it back to ancient times, but
Darwin came to it via his grandfather. Darwin's grandfather was
not a moron, unlike Darwin, and he was a huge proponent of
common descent.
It was WALLACE, not Darwin, who came up with "Natural Selection."
Darwin never understood the topic, much less originated anything.
Darwin's one and only "Theory" was pangenesis. It was lamarckism
with Darwin's added "Gemmules" idiocy. Darwin believed that if
you built up your leg muscles then your leg muscles would produce
"Built up leg muscles" gemmules. These would travel to your
gonads -- assuming you had any -- and would be passed on to your
offspring which would be born with built up leg muscles. In the
Soviet world, WHICH OUTLAWED EVOLUTION, they tried to use this
idiocy (their version was called lysenkoism) on wheat. There's a
lot of land in Siberia so they thought if they kept cooling down
wheat it was learn to grow in the cold of Siberia...
Yes Darwin was a raging jackass! He not only didn't believe in
evolution but, he actually had the secrets to inheritance handed
to him already -- BEFORE he came up with his idiotic pangenesis!
By becoming the name & face of naturalism and rejecting real
science, throwing away Mendel, the English speaking world was set
back 20 years! It took that long for Mendel's work to be
rediscovered by some useless Brit who tried to rob all the credit
for it...
On 8/27/2025 12:39 PM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/25/25 2:16 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Hey, don't enlighten just
You clearly believe that reality can be altered by way of a
popularity contest.
You honestly are divorced from anything that might be taken
for "Science" or objective reality...
Did you do the Google on Darwin's pangenesis? Lamarackism?
Lysenkoism?
Or are you just not ready to accept reality unless there's
a crowd you can hide in, or some high priest tells you that
you must?
Honey, what's your point?! That Darwin got some things wrong?! Well,
duh!! Did you know that Aristotle believed that women were not fully
human?? Of course, such proves that he was a jerk, but as philosophers
go, he is still ranked quite high on the list.
Dawn
On 8/29/2025 10:49 AM, % wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/28/2025 9:23 PM, % wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/27/2025 11:20 PM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/27/25 4:36 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
I would like to know
This is difficult for me, as anything I say, no matter how
honest, you
will just use the power of your mental illnesses to brush
off as a
quip...
You are NOT intellectually capable of discussing this
topic. You
don't understand it and clearly lack the ability to
deconstruct any
problem, perform any type of analysis & pose a test.
Instead, you
throw out ridiculous -- LAUGHABLE -- demands for some sort of
popularity contest ("write a book!") or for me to produce some
sort of high priest to bestow upon you all truths...
I'm not going to bother with you anymore. You're just a waste.
Instead, I will either ignore you or use your babbling as
an excuse
to reiterate my points. But I'm not going to trouble anyone
with
you anymore.
That's fine. Even though I have asked you this several
times now, why no mention of Ronald A. Fisher. Do you think
that he was an idiot, also??
Dawn
he crossposted like one
The alt.conspiracy forum is perfect for JTEM!
give him another week or so and he'll be gone for months
Fingers (and toes) crossed!
On 8/29/2025 5:06 PM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/29/25 10:05 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
If Charles Darwin did not believe in "evolution", why did his name
appear 74 times
You are so outstandingly STUPID that I'm at a loss. I feel that I
want to insult you but have no hope of matching, much less
exceeding, the insult that nature has so clearly dealt you...
IF you want to pretend to be able to grasp words that lay before
you then address what I stated. I gave you a chain to follow --
all of three links in length -- which brought you to the fact that
Darwin is a myth, that the real Darwin never even believed in
evolution. And instead of evaluating the facts presented, instead
of dealing with the facts you habitually vomit fallacious
"Arguments" the likes of which would get you dismissed from any
high school level debating team... "I want authorities to tell me
what things mean," and "if what you say is true, why isn't it more
popular?"
Pangenesis. Lysenkoism. Lamarckism.
Shades of gray separate them, AT BEST. Each is just a slight
rephrasing of the next. AND, it is exactly what Darwin believed
and EXACTLY what the people who banned "evolution" believed.
Pretend you're normal and address this fact.
Well, why did the Scopes Trial even happen then?
What was the big
deal?? Why did BOTH sides even mention Darwin? And, why no mention of
the fact that Darwin did *not* "believe" in evolution??
Dawn
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/28/2025 9:23 PM, % wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/27/2025 11:20 PM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/27/25 4:36 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
I would like to know
This is difficult for me, as anything I say, no matter how honest, you >>>>> will just use the power of your mental illnesses to brush off as a
quip...
You are NOT intellectually capable of discussing this topic. You
don't understand it and clearly lack the ability to deconstruct any
problem, perform any type of analysis & pose a test. Instead, you
throw out ridiculous -- LAUGHABLE -- demands for some sort of
popularity contest ("write a book!") or for me to produce some
sort of high priest to bestow upon you all truths...
I'm not going to bother with you anymore. You're just a waste.
Instead, I will either ignore you or use your babbling as an excuse
to reiterate my points. But I'm not going to trouble anyone with
you anymore.
That's fine. Even though I have asked you this several times now,
why no mention of Ronald A. Fisher. Do you think that he was an
idiot, also??
Dawn
he crossposted like one
The alt.conspiracy forum is perfect for JTEM!
give him another week or so and he'll be gone for months
On 8/29/2025 11:25 AM, jojo wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/29/2025 10:49 AM, % wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/28/2025 9:23 PM, % wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 8/27/2025 11:20 PM, JTEM wrote:
On 8/27/25 4:36 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
I would like to know
This is difficult for me, as anything I say, no matter
how honest, you
will just use the power of your mental illnesses to brush
off as a
quip...
You are NOT intellectually capable of discussing this
topic. You
don't understand it and clearly lack the ability to
deconstruct any
problem, perform any type of analysis & pose a test.
Instead, you
throw out ridiculous -- LAUGHABLE -- demands for some
sort of
popularity contest ("write a book!") or for me to produce
some
sort of high priest to bestow upon you all truths...
I'm not going to bother with you anymore. You're just a
waste.
Instead, I will either ignore you or use your babbling as
an excuse
to reiterate my points. But I'm not going to trouble
anyone with
you anymore.
That's fine. Even though I have asked you this several
times now, why no mention of Ronald A. Fisher. Do you
think that he was an idiot, also??
Dawn
he crossposted like one
The alt.conspiracy forum is perfect for JTEM!
give him another week or so and he'll be gone for months
Fingers (and toes) crossed!
i have seen jtem in other groups when i was researching groups.
i still have many groups left to check. but he he was mostly in
these.. i forgot, but he's there.
Keep talking to him there; maybe he will leave us alone!!
Dawn
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 37:11:17 |
| Calls: | 10,392 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,161 |