TURMEL: Fed Court of Appeal won't declare Covid False Alarm

Facebook banned me from posting at Apple Orange Resistance because of my announcement of the Oct 4 Federal Court of Appeal hearing of the Aylen appeal. Here is my report on it.

JCT: The appeal of the Aylen and Zinn decisions was heard
before Federal Court of Appeal Madame Gleason, Madame
MacTavish and Madame Monaghan at 2pm Oct 4 2022 at 180 Queen
St. W. in Toronto.

I got the make the case that the Covid Mortality was a False
Alarm after being hyped a hundredfold!

Then I pointed out that the mRNA vaccine was not only not
effective but was also not safe.

I noted Canadians were still living under restrictions and
many were still be coerced to take the clot-shot for the
False Alarm.

I wanted them to set a precedent and rule that any and all
restrictions based on a False Alarm were unconstitutional
and save the remainder from being coerced by mandates.

They said no. http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19a3aj.pdf is their
reasons for not warning the world that vaccines were not
needed for Covid that was a false alarm:

Date: 20221004
Docket: A-286-21
Citation: 2022 FCA 166

CORAM: GLEASON J.A.
MACTAVISH J.A.
MONAGHAN J.A.

BETWEEN:
JOHN TURMEL
Appellant
and
HIS MAJESTY THE KING
Respondent

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on October 4, 2022.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on
October 4, 2022.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: MONAGHAN J.A.
Date: 20221004
Docket: A-286-21
Citation: 2022 FCA 166

CORAM: GLEASON J.A.
MACTAVISH J.A.
MONAGHAN J.A.

BETWEEN:
JOHN TURMEL
Appellant
And
HIS MAJESTY THE KING
Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on October 4,
2022).

MONAGHAN J.A.

[1] The appellant, John Turmel, appeals a decision of the
Federal Court (2021 FC 1095) dismissing his appeal of an
order of the Case Management Judge striking his statement of
claim in its entirety, without leave to amend and with
costs.

[2] The Federal Court followed this Court's decision in
Hospira Healthcare Corporation v. Kennedy Institute of
Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215 (Hospira), and identified the
appellate standard of review from Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002
SCC 33, as the standard to be applied in its review of the
Case Management Judge's order.

[3] Applying that standard, the Federal Court could find no
reviewable error in the Case Management Judge's decision,
agreeing with her observations regarding the lack of facts
necessary to support the appellant's claims under the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, her observations on
the law, and her conclusion that the claim as drafted is an
abuse of process.

[4] This Court can allow the appeal only if we are satisfied
that the Federal Court made an error of law or a palpable
and overriding error in refusing to interfere with the Case
Management Judge's decision: Hospira, at para. 84. Contrary
to Mr. Turmel's submission, it was not open to the Case
Management Judge or the Federal Court to disregard the
applicable law and it is similarly not open to us to do so.

[5] We see no error in the decision below and accordingly we
will dismiss the appeal with costs, fixed in the all-
inclusive amount of $1,500.00.

"K.A. Siobhan Monaghan" J.A.

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ZINN
DATED OCTOBER 18, 2021, DOCKET NO. T-130-21 DOCKET: A-286-21
STYLE OF CAUSE: JOHN TURMEL v. HIS MAJESTY THE KING
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: OCTOBER 4, 2022

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
GLEASON J.A.
MACTAVISH J.A.
MONAGHAN J.A.

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: MONAGHAN J.A.

APPEARANCES:
John Turmel FOR THE APPELLANT
(ON HIS OWN BEHALF)
James Schneider FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
A. Francois Daigle
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Toronto, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT

JCT: Pretty good reasons to let millions more get the kill
shot. Or not. Maybe they won't be overturned in this life
but I'd bet the afterlife among their victims who took the
shot after Oct 4 2022 won't be so t much fun.

he Crown asked for $1,500 costs and I responded that was
cheap for an attempt to save millions from the pharma-cabal.

Wonder what it feels like to go home after having let
millions have their health harmed?

http://SmartestMan.Ca/c19 has our Federal Court of Canada
Statement of Claim detailing how WHO compared the Covid 3.4%
CFR "Case Fatality Rate" Apple not to Flu's known 10% CFR
"Apple" but to its 100-times smaller 0.1% IFR "Infection
Fatality Rate" "Orange." "Covid Mortality Hyped hundredfold"
is the book at Amazon! https://www.amazon.com/dp/b09dfgld8d

Over 80 self-represented plaintiffs filed claims asking the
Court to declare that Covid was a false alarm and declare
any restrictions or vaccine mandates unconstitutional. The
judges wouldn't let it be heard and slapped us with court
costs for trying to warn the world.

Over 30 million Canadians have taken the clot shot since
then. If you don't think we should be punished for trying to
warn the world that Covid was a false alarm, see the video
and thank us at GoFundMe to pay our costs for trying to
warn you Covid was a false alarm and save you from being
forced to take the myocarditis shot.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/9cqfvq-federal-court-of-canada-covid-false-alarm-costs
https://rumble.com/v1jzi3l-gofundme-for-federal-court-of-canada-covid-false-alarm-costs.html
https://youtu.be/VNIBCftQ_-U

I've just suffered another $1,500 cost for having tried to
warn the world no need for vaccines for a false alarm. Any
help would be noted and appreciated.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)