The court decides "All science must be evidence based." Does anyone
disagree with this?
If so, please explain.
Looking at evidence for acceleration from gravity of 9.8m/s^2
in free fall (60m) drop, and the time to get to each meter.
Done hundreds of years ago by Galileo. Agreed - YES
Has this been reproduced?
Who has the original Galileo log books, and were instruments with
traceable calibration used?
Where is the evidence which would stand up in a court,
beyond reasonable doubt? (95% confidence level in science terminology)
Has someone a budget to do this in a transparent vacuum tube, to reduce effects of air resistance?
You get the idea.
Can math other than acceleration given in units of m/s^2, fit the data?
If so, which model gives better predictions? This is the acid test.
Copyright release on the above in exact and equivalent:
(and rights and patents) all public domain - attribution annon.:
The court decides "All science must be evidence based." Does anyone
disagree with this?
If so, please explain.
Looking at evidence for acceleration from gravity of 9.8m/s^2
in free fall (60m) drop, and the time to get to each meter.
Done hundreds of years ago by Galileo. Agreed - YES
Has this been reproduced?
Who has the original Galileo log books, and were instruments with
traceable calibration used?
Where is the evidence which would stand up in a court,
beyond reasonable doubt? (95% confidence level in science terminology)
Has someone a budget to do this in a transparent vacuum tube, to reduce effects of air resistance?
You get the idea.
Can math other than acceleration given in units of m/s^2, fit the data?
If so, which model gives better predictions? This is the acid test.
Copyright release on the above in exact and equivalent:
(and rights and patents) all public domain - attribution annon.:
On 23 14, Dave wrote:
The court decides "All science must be evidence based." Does anyoneFor the avoidance of doubt, a model which must be
disagree with this?
If so, please explain.
Looking at evidence for acceleration from gravity of 9.8m/s^2
in free fall (60m) drop, and the time to get to each meter.
Done hundreds of years ago by Galileo. Agreed - YES
Has this been reproduced?
Who has the original Galileo log books, and were instruments with
traceable calibration used?
Where is the evidence which would stand up in a court,
beyond reasonable doubt? (95% confidence level in science terminology)
Has someone a budget to do this in a transparent vacuum tube, to reduce
effects of air resistance?
You get the idea.
Can math other than acceleration given in units of m/s^2, fit the data?
If so, which model gives better predictions? This is the acid test.
Copyright release on the above in exact and equivalent:
(and rights and patents) all public domain - attribution annon.:
considered to whether or not it better fits the data of
free fall from gravity is speed increase directly
proportional to distance descended, not time.
Copyright release on the above in exact and equivalent:
(and rights and patents) all public domain - attribution annon.:
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 27:46:45 |
| Calls: | 10,390 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,072 |