1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Hank's Cowardly Passing Snipe At The Sawyer "Hearsy" Suspect Descriptio

    From Sky Throne 19efppp@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 7 01:10:52 2023
    Hank Sienzant recently spake thus: "Then we can return to your hearsay account while you ignore what the person on the scene and the dispatcher who spoke with Sawyer said."

    Have I ignored anything? The "hearsay account" presumably is the FBI document https://postimg.cc/18tHF6n6 in which the FBI says that DPD Assistant Chief Batchelor told the FBI that an unknown witness told Inspector Sawyer that a man had run from the
    building carrying a rifle. The witness's description of this man is what was given out on the radio. Technically this is hearsay, and a sworn statement from Sawyer would be preferable, or better still would be a sworn statement from the unknown witness.
    But this is what we have. The Warren Commission wanted to know where the radio description came from, so the FBI asked the DPD and this document resulted. The description given out on the radio was of a man running FROM the building, not a man in the 6th
    floor window.

    We also have the radio traffic. And hank complains that I ignore what the Dispatcher said, but the Dispatcher could not know any more than what Sawyer told him. Quoting the Dispatcher would only add another level of hearsay. We can quote what Sawyer told
    the Dispatcher and skip that level of hearsay. And Sawyer told the dispatcher that the man was "carrying" a rifle, and that it was unknown whether he had been in the building. Clearly this is the same story told to the FBI by the DPD. The description was
    of a man carrying a rifle outside of the TSBD. That is the source of the radio description. Yet Cowardly Hank will either run away or will use his Fake Logic to obscure the truth as he is want to do. He will never admit the Official Story's suspect
    description could not have been of Oswald, unless Oswald had left the building carrying a rifle.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From donald willis@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 7 08:54:31 2023
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 1:10:53 AM UTC-7, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
    Hank Sienzant recently spake thus: "Then we can return to your hearsay account while you ignore what the person on the scene and the dispatcher who spoke with Sawyer said."

    Have I ignored anything? The "hearsay account" presumably is the FBI document https://postimg.cc/18tHF6n6 in which the FBI says that DPD Assistant Chief Batchelor told the FBI that an unknown witness told Inspector Sawyer that a man had run from the
    building carrying a rifle. The witness's description of this man is what was given out on the radio. Technically this is hearsay, and a sworn statement from Sawyer would be preferable, or better still would be a sworn statement from the unknown witness.
    But this is what we have. The Warren Commission wanted to know where the radio description came from, so the FBI asked the DPD and this document resulted. The description given out on the radio was of a man running FROM the building, not a man in the 6th
    floor window.

    We also have the radio traffic. And hank complains that I ignore what the Dispatcher said, but the Dispatcher could not know any more than what Sawyer told him. Quoting the Dispatcher would only add another level of hearsay. We can quote what Sawyer
    told the Dispatcher and skip that level of hearsay. And Sawyer told the dispatcher that the man was "carrying" a rifle, and that it was unknown whether he had been in the building. Clearly this is the same story told to the FBI by the DPD. The
    description was of a man carrying a rifle outside of the TSBD. That is the source of the radio description. Yet Cowardly Hank will either run away or will use his Fake Logic to obscure the truth as he is want to do. He will never admit the Official Story'
    s suspect description could not have been of Oswald, unless Oswald had left the building carrying a rifle.

    I hadn't connected that "unknown whether he was in the building in the first place" to "running from the building". Of course, then, the witness would only have seen the suspect only *after* he had come out of the dep. There's no room for Hank's, How
    do you know the suspect wasn't in the building? Because Sawyer said so, on the police radio! Very good. By the time Hank returns, he will have forgotten the damage he has done to the LN case...

    But even if the suspect was seen in the building, Hank put a rifle in his hands. Thank you, Hank. Either an Oswald second rifle or a second gunman... And how did O smuggle TWO rifles into the building? Good show, Hank!

    dcw

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sky Throne 19efppp@21:1/5 to donald willis on Thu Sep 7 10:15:34 2023
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:54:33 AM UTC-4, donald willis wrote:
    On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 1:10:53 AM UTC-7, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
    Hank Sienzant recently spake thus: "Then we can return to your hearsay account while you ignore what the person on the scene and the dispatcher who spoke with Sawyer said."

    Have I ignored anything? The "hearsay account" presumably is the FBI document https://postimg.cc/18tHF6n6 in which the FBI says that DPD Assistant Chief Batchelor told the FBI that an unknown witness told Inspector Sawyer that a man had run from the
    building carrying a rifle. The witness's description of this man is what was given out on the radio. Technically this is hearsay, and a sworn statement from Sawyer would be preferable, or better still would be a sworn statement from the unknown witness.
    But this is what we have. The Warren Commission wanted to know where the radio description came from, so the FBI asked the DPD and this document resulted. The description given out on the radio was of a man running FROM the building, not a man in the 6th
    floor window.

    We also have the radio traffic. And hank complains that I ignore what the Dispatcher said, but the Dispatcher could not know any more than what Sawyer told him. Quoting the Dispatcher would only add another level of hearsay. We can quote what Sawyer
    told the Dispatcher and skip that level of hearsay. And Sawyer told the dispatcher that the man was "carrying" a rifle, and that it was unknown whether he had been in the building. Clearly this is the same story told to the FBI by the DPD. The
    description was of a man carrying a rifle outside of the TSBD. That is the source of the radio description. Yet Cowardly Hank will either run away or will use his Fake Logic to obscure the truth as he is want to do. He will never admit the Official Story'
    s suspect description could not have been of Oswald, unless Oswald had left the building carrying a rifle.
    I hadn't connected that "unknown whether he was in the building in the first place" to "running from the building". Of course, then, the witness would only have seen the suspect only *after* he had come out of the dep. There's no room for Hank's, How
    do you know the suspect wasn't in the building? Because Sawyer said so, on the police radio! Very good. By the time Hank returns, he will have forgotten the damage he has done to the LN case...

    But even if the suspect was seen in the building, Hank put a rifle in his hands. Thank you, Hank. Either an Oswald second rifle or a second gunman... And how did O smuggle TWO rifles into the building? Good show, Hank!

    dcw

    You have given me the opportunity to ramble, so I will. Oswald probably did carry in a 2-foot package on Friday morning. Maybe a Winchester would break down to fit in such a package. I know of a Winchester 22 that would. I actually owned it for a few
    days recently...until I saw the Draconian punishments my state imposes for possessing such a thing without permission. I don't know if larger caliber guns might break down the same way. And we have the Ralph Yates story, which has Oswald bringing in a M-
    C size package on Wednesday. So that could be two Oswald rifles. We also know that Warren Caster brought in 2 rifles on Wednesday. He says he brought them home on that day, but nobody ever checked. What an investigation! Then we have some witness who
    said that "Honest Joe" delivered a rifle-sized package on the day of the assassination. So we might have had 5 rifles in the building. Quite a lot of rifle activity for a building in which a rifle had never been seen before.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)