Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?

It doesn't exist.

Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?

POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!


This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.

No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.

Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.

******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER. ******************************************************************

You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.

(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:42:07 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?

You are simply lying, you`ve ducked dozens, perhaps hundreds of question asked of you here.

It doesn't exist.

Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?

POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!

This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.

No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.

Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.

******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER. ******************************************************************

You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.

(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 10:36:49 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:42:07?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?

You are simply lying, you`ve ducked dozens, perhaps hundreds of question asked of you here.

Well, Chickenshit had his chance, and just lied and ran. Made an
empty claim with no citation - which *HE* himself asserts is a lie.

Back to the questions that Chickenshit runs from...

It doesn't exist.

Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?

POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!


This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.

No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.

Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.

******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
******************************************************************

You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.

(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 1:39:10 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 10:36:49 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 10:42:07?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?

You are simply lying, you`ve ducked dozens, perhaps hundreds of question asked of you here.

Well, Chickenshit had his chance, and just lied and ran.

Proof who the liar is can be found by following the discussion between Ben and I (follow the discussion down to see Ben`s deceitful "answers") here...

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/OJ5fEVfYTfY/m/DBEnIE7CBAAJ

I asked 5 questions, Ben slithered, double talked, blew smoke, denied factual information, but never really answered any of them.

Made an
empty claim with no citation - which *HE* himself asserts is a lie.

Back to the questions that Chickenshit runs from...

It doesn't exist.

Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?

POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!


This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.

No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.

Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.

******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
******************************************************************

You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.

(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 11:40:46 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?

It doesn't exist.

Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?

POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!

This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.

No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.

Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.

******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER. ******************************************************************

You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.

I'll try. Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?

The Challenge - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ

(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:20:27 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:10:29 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?

It doesn't exist.

Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?

POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!


This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.

No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.

Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.

******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
******************************************************************

You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.

I'll try.

No coward, this isn't a try. You're asking *ME* to ask the
question... this is YOUR burden.

So no, you've not even tried... as I predicted...

Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?

Pick one, coward!!!

If I pick, you'll whine... no reason for me to carry YOUR burden!

The Challenge - Part 1 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ >The Challenge - Part 2 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 1 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 2 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 2a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 3 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 3a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 4 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 5 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 6 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 7 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 8 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 9 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 10 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11b >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 12 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 12a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 13 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 14 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 15 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ >My Scenario - The Conclusion >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ

(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 6:10:30 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?

It doesn't exist.

Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?

POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!

This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.

No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.

Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a question first - because I've already proven you won't.

******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER. ******************************************************************

You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.

I'll try. Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?

Good call, there must be dozens of issues raised and left hanging with no resolution offered.

But isn`t Ben adorable when he pretends he is willing to discuss ideas like an adult? Like a child in a toy fire truck pretending he is looking to put out fires. Fucking precious.

The Challenge - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ The Challenge - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 2a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 3 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 3a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 4 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 5 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 6 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ My Scenario - Part 7 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 8 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ My Scenario - Part 9 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 10 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 11 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 11a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 11b https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 12 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 12a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 13 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 14 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ My Scenario - Part 15 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ My Scenario - The Conclusion https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ

(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:32:42 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:10:29 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?

It doesn't exist.

Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?

POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!


This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.

No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.

Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.

******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
******************************************************************

You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.

I'll try.

No coward, this isn't a try. You're asking *ME* to ask the
question...

Er, no, I'm asking you to ANSWER the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus.

this is YOUR burden.

So no, you've not even tried... as I predicted...

Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?

Pick one, coward!!!

Okay. In your Magnum Opus, you write in Part 1, "At least three shooters fired multiple weapons from at least three different directions, striking the President three times, and striking Connally at least twice, and probably three times. Clearly a
conspiracy. Oswald was not a shooter. Period."

My question is this: Why hasn't Team Oswald ran any tests to replicate what you allege? The WC ran tests, and so did the HSCA. Private parties have ran computer simulations, reconstructed the shooting sequence, and so on.

Why are you allowed to make the allegation as fact when you've provided no specific claim or tests that would confirm your hypothesis? In other words, why is the bar set so low for you, when you are the one making the claim?

If I pick, you'll whine... no reason for me to carry YOUR burden!

The Challenge - Part 1 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ >The Challenge - Part 2 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 1 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 2 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 2a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 3 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 3a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 4 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 5 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 6 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 7 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 8 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 9 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 10 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11b >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 12 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 12a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 13 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 14 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 15 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ >My Scenario - The Conclusion >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ >>

(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:17:49 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:32:42?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:10:29 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?

It doesn't exist.

Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?

POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!


This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the
truth of the matter.

No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and
that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.

Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.

******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT
YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
******************************************************************

You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.

I'll try.

No coward, this isn't a try. You're asking *ME* to ask the
question...

Er, no...

Er yes.

You're asking ME to carry YOUR burden.

All you're doing is proving what I said... that you won't be able to,
in fact, I predict that you won't even try.

this is YOUR burden.

So no, you've not even tried... as I predicted...

Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?

Pick one, coward!!!

Okay. In your Magnum Opus, you write in Part 1, "At least three
shooters fired multiple weapons from at least three different
directions, striking the President three times, and striking Connally
at least twice, and probably three times. Clearly a conspiracy. Oswald
was not a shooter. Period."

Notice folks, that although Chuckles the Clown asked me to answer
questions posed in my "Magnum Opus"... he didn't quote any questions
from there.

My question is this: Why hasn't Team Oswald ran any tests to replicate what you allege?

For some of the same reasons that believers have never conducted any
tests. Of course, you have ADDITIONAL reasons you refuse to do any
tests... they would prove you wrong.


ROTFLMAO!!!! You failed.

The WC ran tests

And buried the inconvenient ones...

and so did the HSCA

Nothing that comes to mind... do you have any citations???

Private parties have ran computer simulations

Not a test.

reconstructed the shooting sequence, and so on.

Not a test.

Why are you allowed to make the allegation as fact

Because I can support it with actual citations to evidence.

when you've provided no specific claim or tests that would confirm
your hypothesis?

You've produced **NOTHING** that supports your non-existent scenario.

In other words, why is the bar set so low for you, when you are the
one making the claim?

When you have to lie to make a point, the only point you've made is
that you're a liar.

If I pick, you'll whine... no reason for me to carry YOUR burden!

The Challenge - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ >>>The Challenge - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 2a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 3 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 3a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 4 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 5 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 6 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 7 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 8 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 9 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 10 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 11 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 11a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 11b >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 12 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 12a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 13 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 14 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 15 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ >>>My Scenario - The Conclusion >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ >>>>

(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics
pose, you prove that every day.)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 12:38:52 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:17:49 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:32:42?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:10:29 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>> Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?

It doesn't exist.

Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?

POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!


This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the >>>> truth of the matter.

No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that
Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and >>>> that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.

Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a
question first - because I've already proven you won't.

******************************************************************
ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT >>>> YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
******************************************************************

You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.

I'll try.

No coward, this isn't a try. You're asking *ME* to ask the
question...

Er, no...

Er yes.

You're asking ME to carry YOUR burden.

All you're doing is proving what I said... that you won't be able to,
in fact, I predict that you won't even try.

this is YOUR burden.

So no, you've not even tried... as I predicted...

Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?

Pick one, coward!!!

Okay. In your Magnum Opus, you write in Part 1, "At least three
shooters fired multiple weapons from at least three different
directions, striking the President three times, and striking Connally
at least twice, and probably three times. Clearly a conspiracy. Oswald
was not a shooter. Period."

Notice folks, that although Chuckles the Clown asked me to answer
questions posed in my "Magnum Opus"... he didn't quote any questions
from there.

My question is this: Why hasn't Team Oswald ran any tests to replicate what you allege?

For some of the same reasons that believers have never conducted any
tests. Of course, you have ADDITIONAL reasons you refuse to do any
tests... they would prove you wrong.

So the reason Team Oswald hasn't run tests is because the Oswald Alone side has never ran tests? Is that your answer?

ROTFLMAO!!!! You failed.

The WC ran tests

And buried the inconvenient ones...

and so did the HSCA

Nothing that comes to mind... do you have any citations???

Private parties have ran computer simulations

Not a test.

reconstructed the shooting sequence, and so on.

Not a test.

Why are you allowed to make the allegation as fact

Because I can support it with actual citations to evidence.

when you've provided no specific claim or tests that would confirm
your hypothesis?

You've produced **NOTHING** that supports your non-existent scenario.

In other words, why is the bar set so low for you, when you are the
one making the claim?

When you have to lie to make a point, the only point you've made is
that you're a liar.

If I pick, you'll whine... no reason for me to carry YOUR burden!

The Challenge - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ

(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics >>>> pose, you prove that every day.)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 2:01:16 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:

On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 12:38:52 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:17:49 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 5:32:42?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:10:29 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 9:42:07?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>> Where's the question on this case that critics can't answer?

It doesn't exist.

Where's the question on this case that believers can't answer?

POSTED EVERY SINGLE DAY IN A MULTITUDE OF FORMS!!!


This is all a lurker needs to recognize to figure out who's got the >>>> truth of the matter.

No need to delve into the minutia of the evidence... just see that >>>> Gil, David, and I ask questions daily that believers run from... and >>>> that believers are unable to post a question we can't answer.

Here's a freebie for you kooks... I won't even demand you answer a >>>> question first - because I've already proven you won't.

****************************************************************** >>>> ASK ANY QUESTION RELATED TO THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK ON 11/22/63 THAT >>>> YOU THINK I CAN'T ANSWER.
****************************************************************** >>>>
You won't be able to. In fact, I predict you won't even try.

I'll try.

No coward, this isn't a try. You're asking *ME* to ask the
question...

Er, no...

Er yes.

You're asking ME to carry YOUR burden.

All you're doing is proving what I said... that you won't be able to,
in fact, I predict that you won't even try.

this is YOUR burden.

So no, you've not even tried... as I predicted...

Why not answer the questions embedded in your Magnum Opus?

Pick one, coward!!!

Okay. In your Magnum Opus, you write in Part 1, "At least three
shooters fired multiple weapons from at least three different directions, striking the President three times, and striking Connally
at least twice, and probably three times. Clearly a conspiracy. Oswald was not a shooter. Period."

Notice folks, that although Chuckles the Clown asked me to answer questions posed in my "Magnum Opus"... he didn't quote any questions
from there.

My question is this: Why hasn't Team Oswald ran any tests to replicate what you allege?

For some of the same reasons that believers have never conducted any tests. Of course, you have ADDITIONAL reasons you refuse to do any tests... they would prove you wrong.

So the reason Team Oswald hasn't run tests is because the Oswald Alone side has never ran tests? Is that your answer?

Not even true. Posner ran tests. Alvarez ran tests. Lattimer ran tests.

ROTFLMAO!!!! You failed.

The WC ran tests

And buried the inconvenient ones...

and so did the HSCA

Nothing that comes to mind... do you have any citations???

Private parties have ran computer simulations

Not a test.

reconstructed the shooting sequence, and so on.

Not a test.

Why are you allowed to make the allegation as fact

Because I can support it with actual citations to evidence.

when you've provided no specific claim or tests that would confirm
your hypothesis?

You've produced **NOTHING** that supports your non-existent scenario.

In other words, why is the bar set so low for you, when you are the
one making the claim?

When you have to lie to make a point, the only point you've made is
that you're a liar.

If I pick, you'll whine... no reason for me to carry YOUR burden! >>>The Challenge - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ

The Challenge - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ

(No need for me to prove that you can't answer the questions critics >>>> pose, you prove that every day.)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 2:28:59 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:

On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 2:01:16 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:

On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 12:38:52 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:

For some of the same reasons that believers have never conducted any tests. Of course, you have ADDITIONAL reasons you refuse to do any tests... they would prove you wrong.

So the reason Team Oswald hasn't run tests is because the Oswald Alone side has never ran tests? Is that your answer?

Not even true. Posner ran tests. Alvarez ran tests. Lattimer ran tests.

Some of the best tests were conducted by the father/son ballistic experts Luke and Michael
Haag. The showed that the path taken by the single bullet was not only possible but to be
expected. A brief summary of their work:

Father-and-son team Luke and Michael Haag have used the latest technology to re-examine the idea that one bullet hit President John F. Kennedy and Texas Gov. John Connally. The duo is featured on the PBS series “Nova” in a documentary called “Cold
Case JFK.” They used 3D laser scanners to document the crime scene of Kennedy’s assassination and their proposed trajectory of the single bullet in an effort to debunk popular conspiracy theories1. The Haags’ research demonstrates that it is “
easily” demonstrable that one bullet can go through two people if you understand how this particular unusual bullet behaves after it leaves Kennedy’s body1. The 6.5 millimeter Carcano bullet made by Olin Winchester is “extremely stable” and will
go through a lot of material, tumbling when it comes out1. The entry wound in Connally is the consequence of a destabilized bullet from somewhere1. Luke Haag said, "It’s like a badly thrown football. It normally flies true and straight. When this
bullet emerged from Kennedy – or any ballistic medium … it’s now yawing and tumbling"1.

In addition, there have been a number of History Channel programs that did recreations that
showed the plausibility of the SBT. They used a sharpshooter in an elevated tower to simulate
the sniper's nest. They used lasers. They used animal carcasses to simulate torsos of JFK
and JBC. All of these tests served to affirm the SBT and the fact the shots were fired from
behind JFK.

Below is a comprehensive list of the tests conducted by the Oswald innocent crowd:
_______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:01:14 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

For some of the same reasons that believers have never conducted any
tests. Of course, you have ADDITIONAL reasons you refuse to do any
tests... they would prove you wrong.

So the reason Team Oswald hasn't run tests is...

For the same reasons that believers have never conducted any tests.

Despite the fact that you lied about the question - it was indeed
answered.

Completely and credibly.

You lose.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 13:31:56 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

Some of the best tests were conducted by the father/son ballistic experts Luke and Michael
Haag. The showed that the path taken by the single bullet was not only possible but to be
expected.

The expert testimony refutes this.

You lose.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 13:31:56 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

Some of the best tests were conducted by the father/son ballistic experts Luke and Michael
Haag. The showed that the path taken by the single bullet was not only possible but to be
expected.

The expert testimony refutes this.

Look, Ben was almost man enough to make an actual argument. Almost.

You lose.

Ben thinks it is winning to blow hot air, vaguely allude to things, make unsupported claims, ect (tm). In his mind he has been winning for years.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:28:58 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:47:00 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:01:14 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

For some of the same reasons that believers have never conducted any
tests. Of course, you have ADDITIONAL reasons you refuse to do any
tests... they would prove you wrong.

So the reason Team Oswald hasn't run tests is...

For the same reasons that believers have never conducted any tests.

Despite the fact that you lied about the question - it was indeed
answered.

And this shows why nobody bothers to play Ben`s crooked games.

Completely and credibly.

So sayeth Ben.

You lose.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:59:32 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)