1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Alan Ford's Antenna Proof Of Hidden Man Behind "Lovelady" Is Not Valid

    From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to All on Wed Nov 1 01:37:55 2023
    He's wrong about this proof because the antenna is practically invisible for its whole length in the frame in question, not just to the right of "Lobelady's" body. If a person was being blacked out to "Lovelady's" right, it might end up obscuring that
    part of the antenna, but not the whole thing. The antenna is less visible in this frame for some other reason. This doesn't mean that somebody is not being hidden here, but the antenna doesn't prove it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Thu Nov 2 10:57:12 2023
    On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 4:47:23 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 4:37:57 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:




    Anyone who takes Ford's Duncan MacRae evidence nuttery seriously is a fool...


    The only thing Ford is correct on is the scoop neckline...


    Ford is using the validity of the scoop neckline to promote other crazy Cinque-like evidence claims...


    He's a troll...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)