On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 18:28:42 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<
hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, November 8, 2023 at 10:48:48?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 9:17:25 PM UTC-4, gregr...@outlook.com wrote:
...
Are you his designated representative? Do you have a contract to
speak for him? Have you discussed this with him privately or are you
just making this shit up on the fly? Rhetorical question. We both know >>>> the answer.
I hereby designate Bud to speak for me. Happy? You CTs will find
every way to avoid discussing the JFK assassination, won't you?
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/-CUVS3Ytluw/m/zfiyumYXAgAJ >>
You designated Chickenshot to speak for you -
Here's what Huckster deleted:
You designated Chickenshot to speak for you - but when he does, you
refuse to acknowledge or defend it.
You ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to publicly state that the prosectors never
dissected the throat wound - EVEN THOUGH YOU KNOW THIS TO BE A FACT.
Because a fellow traveler lied about this, speaking for you, and you ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to correct a fellow traveler.
It's amusing that Huckster claims that critics refuse to debate the
evidence... it's crystal clear who's refusing.
As a joke.
Sorry moron, there's no "joke" evident in your claim. One that I
posted IN CONTEXT and with a CITATION TO THE ORIGINAL...
Lied about that, didn't you?
That’s the hill you choose to plant your flag?
Holding liars to the lies they tell? Absolutely!
Hilarious.
Keep laughing... you'll someday learn how many are laughing at you.
And again, you prove that it's *YOU* who will find every way to avoid discussing the JFK case.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)