I tried using Time Shift but it didn't restore the older version of the system files that I selected. Are there any apps that work better for restoring?
On 9/16/2022 10:16 AM, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
I tried using Time Shift but it didn't restore the older version of
the system files that I selected. Are there any apps that work better
for restoring?
https://www.makeuseof.com/use-timeshift-backup-and-restore-linux-snapshots/
"In case you aren't able to boot into your system, you can try booting
into it using a live USB stick and then use Timeshift to restore
it to
its previous working state and fix any broken or misconfigured
system component, setting, or file."
Maybe that would work as an approach ?
Paul
On 9/16/22 12:16 PM, Paul wrote:
On 9/16/2022 10:16 AM, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
I tried using Time Shift but it didn't restore the older version of the system files that I selected. Are there any apps that work better for restoring?
https://www.makeuseof.com/use-timeshift-backup-and-restore-linux-snapshots/ >>
"In case you aren't able to boot into your system, you can try booting
into it using a live USB stick and then use Timeshift to restore it to >> its previous working state and fix any broken or misconfigured
system component, setting, or file."
Maybe that would work as an approach ?
Paul
Paul you sound uncertain, 'you can try' or 'maybe that would work"???????
The op was looking for an alternative to Time Shift. I gave up on Time Shift a long time ago, currently I use an external cloning docking device, where I place my primary (working drive) and copy/clone to a target (second drive). Has not failed me yet.
On 9/16/2022 3:17 PM, Nic wrote:
On 9/16/22 12:16 PM, Paul wrote:
On 9/16/2022 10:16 AM, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
I tried using Time Shift but it didn't restore the older version of
the system files that I selected. Are there any apps that work
better for restoring?
https://www.makeuseof.com/use-timeshift-backup-and-restore-linux-snapshots/ >>>
"In case you aren't able to boot into your system, you can try
booting
into it using a live USB stick and then use Timeshift to restore
it to
its previous working state and fix any broken or misconfigured
system component, setting, or file."
Maybe that would work as an approach ?
Paul
Paul you sound uncertain, 'you can try' or 'maybe that would
work"???????
The op was looking for an alternative to Time Shift. I gave up on
Time Shift a long time ago, currently I use an external cloning
docking device, where I place my primary (working drive) and
copy/clone to a target (second drive). Has not failed me yet.
Backup and restore, generally works best when the target
partition is not being used. And that's for a partition
where files are busy and will not release.
Any time a tool gives you a problem, think back to the
general principles that apply. If a tool is "refusing",
then look at an alternate way to run it where it won't
refuse.
Paul
The op was looking for an alternative to Time Shift. I gave up on Time
Shift a long time ago, currently I use an external cloning docking
device, where I place my primary (working drive) and copy/clone to a
target (second drive). Has not failed me yet.
On 09/16/2022 04:17 PM, Nic wrote:Time
The op was looking for an alternative to Time Shift. I gave up on
Shift a long time ago, currently I use an external cloning docking
device, where I place my primary (working drive) and copy/clone to a
target (second drive). Has not failed me yet.
Then I can copy the /root folder to an external drive and use that
instead of fighting with trash like Time Shift?
On 09/16/2022 04:17 PM, Nic wrote:
The op was looking for an alternative to Time Shift. I gave up on Time
Shift a long time ago, currently I use an external cloning docking
device, where I place my primary (working drive) and copy/clone to a
target (second drive). Has not failed me yet.
Then I can copy the /root folder to an external drive and use that
instead of fighting with trash like Time Shift?
On 9/16/22 5:12 PM, Paul wrote:yet.
On 9/16/2022 3:17 PM, Nic wrote:
On 9/16/22 12:16 PM, Paul wrote:
On 9/16/2022 10:16 AM, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
I tried using Time Shift but it didn't restore the older version of the system files that I selected. Are there any apps that work better for restoring?
https://www.makeuseof.com/use-timeshift-backup-and-restore-linux-snapshots/
"In case you aren't able to boot into your system, you can try booting >>>> into it using a live USB stick and then use Timeshift to restore it to >>>> its previous working state and fix any broken or misconfigured
system component, setting, or file."
Maybe that would work as an approach ?
Paul
Paul you sound uncertain, 'you can try' or 'maybe that would work"??????? >>>
The op was looking for an alternative to Time Shift. I gave up on Time Shift a long time ago, currently I use an external cloning docking device, where I place my primary (working drive) and copy/clone to a target (second drive). Has not failed me
Paul you exasperate me, on the one hand you are very knowledgeable about the coding and purpose of said hard ware and software issues, but rarely delve into the core issues of purpose of life's gratitude's. PS: I think you are wonderful.
Backup and restore, generally works best when the target
partition is not being used. And that's for a partition
where files are busy and will not release.
Any time a tool gives you a problem, think back to the
general principles that apply. If a tool is "refusing",
then look at an alternate way to run it where it won't
refuse.
Paul
On 9/16/22 17:12, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
On 09/16/2022 04:17 PM, Nic wrote:
The op was looking for an alternative to Time Shift. I gave up on
Time Shift a long time ago, currently I use an external cloning
docking device, where I place my primary (working drive) and
copy/clone to a target (second drive). Has not failed me yet.
Then I can copy the /root folder to an external drive and use that
instead of fighting with trash like Time Shift?
Timeshift is not trash but you have to understand how to
employ it. At times it can be difficult to use because your backup
partition or drive may not be mounted when you use external drives.
Use whatever tool you want to use but read its documentation
before you try to use it.
If you planning on using usb to copy your home folder to an external
drive be prepared that something is broken, if it is a software
solution , not the answer, it appears that the coders have lost contact
with the beast they thought they have tamed.
On 9/17/22 01:34, Nic wrote:
If you planning on using usb to copy your home folder to an external
drive be prepared that something is broken, if it is a software
solution , not the answer, it appears that the coders have lost contact
with the beast they thought they have tamed.
Using Clonezilla to image the drive to an external drive has never failed me ... Linux or Windows. Been doing it this way for well over 8+ years.
On 9/17/22 01:34, Nic wrote:
If you planning on using usb to copy your home folder to an external
drive be prepared that something is broken, if it is a software
solution , not the answer, it appears that the coders have lost contact
with the beast they thought they have tamed.
Using Clonezilla to image the drive to an external drive has never
failed me ... Linux or Windows. Been doing it this way for well over 8+ years.
On 9/17/22 01:34, Nic wrote:
If you planning on using usb to copy your home folder to an external
drive be prepared that something is broken, if it is a software
solution , not the answer, it appears that the coders have lost contact
with the beast they thought they have tamed.
Using Clonezilla to image the drive to an external drive has never failed me ... Linux or Windows. Been doing it this
way for well over 8+ years.
On 9/16/22 5:12 PM, Paul wrote:
On 9/16/2022 3:17 PM, Nic wrote:Paul you exasperate me, on the one hand you are very knowledgeable about
On 9/16/22 12:16 PM, Paul wrote:Backup and restore, generally works best when the target partition is
On 9/16/2022 10:16 AM, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
I tried using Time Shift but it didn't restore the older version of
the system files that I selected. Are there any apps that work
better for restoring?
https://www.makeuseof.com/use-timeshift-backup-and-restore-linux- snapshots/
"In case you aren't able to boot into your system, you can try
booting
into it using a live USB stick and then use Timeshift to
restore
it to
its previous working state and fix any broken or misconfigured
system component, setting, or file."
Maybe that would work as an approach ?
Paul
Paul you sound uncertain, 'you can try' or 'maybe that would
work"???????
The op was looking for an alternative to Time Shift. I gave up on Time
Shift a long time ago, currently I use an external cloning docking
device, where I place my primary (working drive) and copy/clone to a
target (second drive). Has not failed me yet.
not being used. And that's for a partition where files are busy and
will not release.
Any time a tool gives you a problem, think back to the general
principles that apply. If a tool is "refusing", then look at an
alternate way to run it where it won't refuse.
Paul
the coding and purpose of said hard ware and software issues, but rarely delve into the core issues of purpose of life's gratitude's. PS: I think
you are wonderful.
I'm using btrfs and timeshift.
On 09/17/2022 09:30 PM, Killadebug wrote:
I'm using btrfs and timeshift.
what is the benefit of btrfs over rsync? i only want a backup of the
/root folder so that i can restore a working system if i ever need to.
i backup all of the /home folders to an external drive.
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 07:29:17 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
On 09/17/2022 09:30 PM, Killadebug wrote:
I'm using btrfs and timeshift.
what is the benefit of btrfs over rsync? i only want a backup of the
/root folder so that i can restore a working system if i ever need to.
i backup all of the /home folders to an external drive.
btrfs snapshot takes all of 1 sec to create, same time to restore 1 sec.
This possible because btrfs is a COW system. You reboot and your system
is restored. I create a hourly snapshot of both my root @ and home @home. Time shift allows to to restore both @ and @home or just @.
On 09/18/2022 03:31 PM, Killadebug wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 07:29:17 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
On 09/17/2022 09:30 PM, Killadebug wrote:
I'm using btrfs and timeshift.
what is the benefit of btrfs over rsync? i only want a backup of the
/root folder so that i can restore a working system if i ever need to.
i backup all of the /home folders to an external drive.
btrfs snapshot takes all of 1 sec to create, same time to restore 1
sec. This possible because btrfs is a COW system. You reboot and your
system is restored. I create a hourly snapshot of both my root @ and
home @home.
Time shift allows to to restore both @ and @home or just @.
i looked at the 'btrfs' setting and the option to ignore or include
specific folders isn't available. does that mean the /home folders (i
have 3) will be included in the backup?
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 17:13:55 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
On 09/18/2022 03:31 PM, Killadebug wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 07:29:17 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
On 09/17/2022 09:30 PM, Killadebug wrote:
I'm using btrfs and timeshift.
what is the benefit of btrfs over rsync? i only want a backup of the
/root folder so that i can restore a working system if i ever need
to.
i backup all of the /home folders to an external drive.
btrfs snapshot takes all of 1 sec to create, same time to restore 1
sec. This possible because btrfs is a COW system. You reboot and your
system is restored. I create a hourly snapshot of both my root @ and
home @home.
Time shift allows to to restore both @ and @home or just @.
i looked at the 'btrfs' setting and the option to ignore or include
specific folders isn't available. does that mean the /home folders (i
have 3) will be included in the backup?
In Timeshift if you do not want your @home subvolume to be included in
your snapshot, simple uncheck the box. Then only your @ root subvolume
will be included in the snapshot. I only keep three hourly snapshots on
my system.
As a followup...since Im using btrfs and it is being actively developed still, I always run the latest Linux Kernel to make sure I have the
latest btrfs improvements. I've been using the Xanmod Kernel for over 5
years and I'm quite happy with both the performance and stability of the kernel. I'm currently running Xanmod Linux Kernel 5.19.9 and I have no issues. Btrfs seems very solid now,
On 09/19/2022 08:49 PM, Killadebug wrote:
As a followup...since Im using btrfs and it is being actively developed
still, I always run the latest Linux Kernel to make sure I have the
latest btrfs improvements. I've been using the Xanmod Kernel for over 5
years and I'm quite happy with both the performance and stability of
the kernel. I'm currently running Xanmod Linux Kernel 5.19.9 and I have
no issues. Btrfs seems very solid now,
Is the patch for Xanmod for comparing differences between versions?
Or do you install it to make Xanmod run better?
Is the patch for Xanmod for comparing differences between versions?
Or do you install it to make Xanmod run better?
I'm not sure what you mean by "patch".
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 02:15:19 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
Is the patch for Xanmod for comparing differences between versions?
Or do you install it to make Xanmod run better?
On 09/23/2022 08:00 PM, Killadebug wrote:patch-5.19.11-xanmod1.xz
I'm not sure what you mean by "patch".
https://github.com/xanmod/linux/releases/download/5.19.11-xanmod1/
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 19:41:52 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 02:15:19 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
Is the patch for Xanmod for comparing differences between versions?
Or do you install it to make Xanmod run better?
On 09/23/2022 08:00 PM, Killadebug wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by "patch".
https://github.com/xanmod/linux/releases/download/5.19.11-xanmod1/patch-5.19.11-xanmod1.xz
Ah I see. No I do not use the patch method. I have the repo enabled and
just download and install the new patched kernel when it is available.
On 09/24/2022 09:27 PM, Killadebug wrote:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 19:41:52 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 02:15:19 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
Is the patch for Xanmod for comparing differences between versions?
Or do you install it to make Xanmod run better?
On 09/23/2022 08:00 PM, Killadebug wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by "patch".
https://github.com/xanmod/linux/releases/download/5.19.11-xanmod1/ patch-5.19.11-xanmod1.xz
Ah I see. No I do not use the patch method. I have the repo enabled and
just download and install the new patched kernel when it is available.
i just installed xanmod and it does seem to be a *bit* faster sometimes,
but i could be imagining it. i haven't used it long enough to make a
real comparison.
the repo indicates there's a newer version available.
On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 18:24:54 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
On 09/24/2022 09:27 PM, Killadebug wrote:patch-5.19.11-xanmod1.xz
On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 19:41:52 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 02:15:19 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:
Is the patch for Xanmod for comparing differences between versions?
Or do you install it to make Xanmod run better?
On 09/23/2022 08:00 PM, Killadebug wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by "patch".
https://github.com/xanmod/linux/releases/download/5.19.11-xanmod1/
Ah I see. No I do not use the patch method. I have the repo enabled and
just download and install the new patched kernel when it is available.
i just installed xanmod and it does seem to be a *bit* faster sometimes,
but i could be imagining it. i haven't used it long enough to make a
real comparison.
the repo indicates there's a newer version available.
Yep...I just updated to 5.19.11
I'm interested in your thoughts after you have used it for a couple of months.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 497 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 18:48:52 |
Calls: | 9,785 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 13,749 |
Messages: | 6,187,729 |