• KDE vs Gnome + media

    From Mike Easter@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 14 08:58:06 2023
    In a recent thread I made some remarks about disliking Gnome and also
    about getting Ub 22.04 Gnome live into Wayland instead of xorg.

    I was recently surprised to see DistroWatch do an 'exchange' of
    reviewers of their heavy hitter Jesse Smith w/ the less known (to me)
    Christine Hall of Foss Force; so JS penned a KDE Neon review for FF,
    while CH will do the same for EndeavorOS for DW. CH is listed as the 'owner
    & editor' of FF. (I'm sorta baffled about the 'owner' of DW)

    DW
    This week DistroWatch and FOSS Force partnered to perform an article
    swap. Christine Hall has offered to review the latest release of the elementary OS distribution for us, and we'll have that for you here
    next Monday. In exchange, our Jesse Smith wrote an overview of KDE,
    its KDE Plasma desktop, and its cool features such as KDE Connect.
    The article on KDE has been published on FOSS Force for your
    enjoyment.

    Personally, I consider KDE my 2nd fave DE after Cinnamon, but in my
    early linux days the DE 'war' waged between KDE and Gnome. The earliest
    KDE used the Qt from TrollTech of .no while the earliest Gnome, came into
    being partially because of an aversion to the then proprietary Qt and
    used GTK. Of course, the toolkits have evolved greatly since those days
    in the late 90s.

    Many websites expressed that DE 'war' back in the day; one of my faves
    was by 'psychocats'.

    Ubuntu didn't come along until 2004; KDE3 was intro'd 2002; Gnome2 in
    '02 and Gnome3 in '08; the last kde3, 3.5 was in 2005 Nov, which
    subsequently
    gave inspiration to the ongoing dev of TrinityDE reminiscent of 3.5.
    Gnome3 and its gnome shell and 'trouble' was released 2011, which gave
    rise to the dev of Mate and Cinnamon, much by Mint dev/s.

    Here's an example of a recent CH article in FF, and JS's KDE Neon review
    there. CH, a journalist since '71, has been linux (now 'brideoflinux')
    since 2002. CH's fave DEs 1-2 are XFCE (Mint's) then KDE. As above,
    she'll have the DW review next week.

    https://fossforce.com/2023/02/kde-plasma-full-featured-desktop-thats-surprisingly-easy-on-resources/
    KDE Plasma: Full Featured Desktop That’s Surprisingly Easy on Resources
    By Jesse Smith on February 6, 2023

    https://fossforce.com/2023/02/a-beginners-guide-to-linux-desktops/ A Beginners’ Guide to Linux Desktops By Christine Hall on February 1, 2023

    JS is a good reviewer, and he gave a very positive review of KDE. He
    also included a par about how one of its strengths 'complexity' might be considered a weak point. The link is there for one to read how he
    expressed that.


    --
    Mike Easter

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rob H@21:1/5 to Mike Easter on Tue Feb 14 18:52:19 2023
    On 14/02/2023 16:58, Mike Easter wrote:
    In a recent thread I made some remarks about disliking Gnome and also
    about getting Ub 22.04 Gnome live into Wayland instead of xorg.

    I was recently surprised to see DistroWatch do an 'exchange' of
    reviewers of their heavy hitter Jesse Smith w/ the less known (to me) Christine Hall of Foss Force; so JS penned a KDE Neon review for FF,
    while CH will do the same for EndeavorOS for DW.  CH is listed as the
    'owner
    & editor' of FF.  (I'm sorta baffled about the 'owner' of DW)

    DW
    This week DistroWatch and FOSS Force partnered to perform an article
    swap. Christine Hall has offered to review the latest release of the
    elementary OS distribution for us, and we'll have that for you here
    next Monday. In exchange, our Jesse Smith wrote an overview of KDE,
    its KDE Plasma desktop, and its cool features such as KDE Connect. The
    article on KDE has been published on FOSS Force for your enjoyment.

    Personally, I consider KDE my 2nd fave DE after Cinnamon, but in my
    early linux days the DE 'war' waged between KDE and Gnome.  The earliest
    KDE used the Qt from TrollTech of .no while the earliest Gnome, came into being partially because of an aversion to the then proprietary Qt and
    used GTK.  Of course, the toolkits have evolved greatly since those days
    in the late 90s.

    Many websites expressed that DE 'war' back in the day; one of my faves
    was by 'psychocats'.

    Ubuntu didn't come along until 2004; KDE3 was intro'd 2002; Gnome2 in
    '02 and Gnome3 in '08; the last kde3, 3.5 was in 2005 Nov, which
    subsequently
    gave inspiration to the ongoing dev of TrinityDE reminiscent of 3.5.
    Gnome3 and its gnome shell and 'trouble' was released 2011, which gave
    rise to the dev of Mate and Cinnamon, much by Mint dev/s.

    Here's an example of a recent CH article in FF, and JS's KDE Neon review there.  CH, a journalist since '71, has been linux (now 'brideoflinux') since 2002. CH's fave DEs 1-2 are XFCE (Mint's) then KDE. As above,
    she'll have the DW review next week.

    https://fossforce.com/2023/02/kde-plasma-full-featured-desktop-thats-surprisingly-easy-on-resources/   KDE Plasma: Full Featured Desktop That’s Surprisingly Easy on Resources
    By Jesse Smith on February 6, 2023

    https://fossforce.com/2023/02/a-beginners-guide-to-linux-desktops/  A Beginners’ Guide to Linux Desktops By Christine Hall on February 1, 2023

    JS is a good reviewer, and he gave a very positive review of KDE.  He
    also included a par about how one of its strengths 'complexity' might be considered a

    weak point.  The link is there for one to read how he
    expressed that.



    I think that is how I got the drop down menu on the said ubuntu machine
    by installing Plasma.
    But when I uninstalled it, the drop down menu was still there

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike Easter@21:1/5 to Rob H on Tue Feb 14 11:10:32 2023
    Rob H wrote:
    I think that is how I got the drop down menu on the said ubuntu machine
    by installing Plasma.

    Well that's a pretty big deal in terms of introducing 'stuff' to an install.

    But when I uninstalled it, the drop down menu was still there

    I don't like to 'junk up' a system which is installed by installing
    'stuff' I'm interested in checking out. My preferred 'testing
    environment' is a live distro. If I want to see KDE I boot a live KDE;
    in fact, I might boot more than one or more than two.

    There's actually a lot of diff between KDE neon and Kubuntu and they are
    both kde on top of ub, and then there's the manjaro kde over arch and
    the sparky and MX kde/s over Deb. And Texstar's was Mandrake now
    independent distro's kde. KDE is SO tweakable that distro dev/s get to
    bring their own ideas to the DE. Neon wins the prize for being the
    'leanest' live to the desktop. Of course that doesn't count Trinity
    because it is TDE :-)

    Installing something and then uninstalling it doesn't 'erase' what all
    has changed. Often.

    And, the problem is that 'fixing something' in an install that is b0rken
    or just 'bent' is a LOT harder than installing something from scratch
    which itself is a bigger deal than booting something live. I suppose one
    could take that down another notch by booting a VM, but I don't go there
    in favor of booting the live USB Ventoy .iso.


    --
    Mike Easter

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)