https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the eyes. He’s
just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal from a
user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-source encrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others who seek more
privacy than other text-messaging services are capable of delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s national security adviser. I did not assume, however, that the request
was from the actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though
I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to
me, I did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?s contentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic fixation
on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow entrap me. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious actors to try to induce journalists to share information that could be used against them.
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal from
a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-source
encrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others who
seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are capable of
delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in question was
President Donald Trump?s national security adviser. I did not assume,
however, that the request was from the actual Michael Waltz. I have
met him in the past, and though I didn?t find it particularly strange
that he might be reaching out to me, I did think it somewhat unusual,
given the Trump administration?s contentious relationship with
journalists?and Trump?s periodic fixation on me specifically. It
immediately crossed my mind that someone could be masquerading as
Waltz in order to somehow entrap me. It is not at all uncommon these
days for nefarious actors to try to induce journalists to share
information that could be used against them.
No one invited anyone.
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal from
a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-source
encrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others who
seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are capable of
delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in question was
President Donald Trump?s national security adviser. I did not assume,
however, that the request was from the actual Michael Waltz. I have
met him in the past, and though I didn?t find it particularly strange
that he might be reaching out to me, I did think it somewhat unusual,
given the Trump administration?s contentious relationship with
journalists?and Trump?s periodic fixation on me specifically. It
immediately crossed my mind that someone could be masquerading as
Waltz in order to somehow entrap me. It is not at all uncommon these
days for nefarious actors to try to induce journalists to share
information that could be used against them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using Signal app, then suddenly this chat appears.
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He’s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I’ve ever read.
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the eyes. He’s
just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the most
extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s national security >> adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a >> Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, >> Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal
from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-source
encrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others
who seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are
capable of delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in
question was President Donald Trump?s national security adviser. I
did not assume, however, that the request was from the actual
Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though I didn?t
find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to me,
I did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?s
contentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic
fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that
someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow entrap
me. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious actors to
try to induce journalists to share information that could be used
against them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using Signal
app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> posted some news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason.
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the Kremlin's
guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows what
else.
On 24 Mar 2025, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> posted some news:vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He’s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I’ve ever read.
Goldberg is a smarmy POS who hates Trump and is in the position to
deliver his opinion to a narrow slice of the population.
If there is a gold lining to this, Goldberg just proved that he can be
easily manipulated and should never be trusted by any government
officials.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> posted some news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong because of it. My guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason.
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal
from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-source
encrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others
who seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are
capable of delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in
question was President Donald Trump?s national security adviser. I
did not assume, however, that the request was from the actual
Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though I didn?t
find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to me,
I did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?s
contentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic
fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that
someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow entrap
me. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious actors to
try to induce journalists to share information that could be used
against them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using Signal
app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal" mean?
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Lou Ribano <lribano@gmx32.com> wrote in
news:vrvdgc$frv$4@toxic.dizum.net:
On 24 Mar 2025, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> posted some news:vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read.
Goldberg is a smarmy POS who hates Trump and is in the position to
deliver his opinion to a narrow slice of the population.
If there is a gold lining to this, Goldberg just proved that he can be easily manipulated and should never be trusted by any government
officials.
Putin was listening in - he's hacked Signal. Why are we discussing war plans on Signal?
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several senior
Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio
and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for
hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows what
else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would NOT
be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi network.
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal
from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others
who seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are
capable of delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in
question was President Donald Trump?s national security adviser.
me,did not assume, however, that the request was from the actual
Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though I didn?t
find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?
entrapcontentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic
fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that
someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious actors to
try to induce journalists to share information that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal" mean?app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
A lie.
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:vrvs9q$2ucm1$1@news.mixmin.net:
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several senior
Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio
and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for
hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows what
else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would NOT
be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi network.
=============
"A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal Messenger
Application," begins the department-wide email, dated March 18 and
obtained by NPR.
The memo continues, "Russian professional hacking groups are employing
the 'linked devices' features to spy on encrypted conversations." It
notes that Google has identified Russian hacking groups that are
"targeting Signal Messenger to spy on persons of interest."
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1-5339801/pentagon-email-signal- vulnerability
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal
from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others
who seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are
capable of delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in
question was President Donald Trump?s national security adviser.
me,did not assume, however, that the request was from the actual
Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though I didn?t
find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?
entrapcontentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic
fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that
someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious actors to
try to induce journalists to share information that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal" mean?app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
A lie.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be part of a chat without an invite.
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying? What
is your evidence he was lying?
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He’s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:vrvs9q$2ucm1$1@news.mixmin.net:
<snip>
"A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal Messenger
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would NOT
be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi network.
Application," begins the department-wide email, dated March 18 and
obtained by NPR.
The memo continues, "Russian professional hacking groups are employing
the 'linked devices' features to spy on encrypted conversations." It
notes that Google has identified Russian hacking groups that are
"targeting Signal Messenger to spy on persons of interest."
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1-5339801/pentagon-email-signal-vulnerability
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He’s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Hegseth's drunk all the time and was boozed up big when he texted that classified information to the editor of The Atlantic recently.
He blacks out once and a while but Trump says that's ok because he was the best pick of the litter.
You should see the video of drunk Hegseth and Ketamine fried Elon dancing on Trump's Oval Office desk while the POTUS acts unaware, a sign of his deepening dementia.
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on
Signal from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an
open-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and
others who seek more privacy than other text-messaging
services are capable of delivering. I assumed that the
Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s
national security adviser.
me,did not assume, however, that the request was from the
actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though
I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might be
reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump
administration?
entrapcontentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s
periodic fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed
my mind that someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order
to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious
actors to try to induce journalists to share information
that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal"app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
mean?
A lie.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be part
of a chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying?
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
What is your evidence he was lying?
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified info
was discussed.
In article <vs13vo$1vk0v$1@dont-email.me>, bax02@news.mixmin.net:
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:vrvs9q$2ucm1$1
the
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in
inadvertentlyeyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently
archivedinvited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several senior
Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio
and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being
whatfor posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for
hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows
NOTelse.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would
be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi network.=============
"A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal Messenger
Application," begins the department-wide email, dated March 18 and
obtained by NPR.
The memo continues, "Russian professional hacking groups are employing
the 'linked devices' features to spy on encrypted conversations." It
notes that Google has identified Russian hacking groups that are
"targeting Signal Messenger to spy on persons of interest."
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1-5339801/pentagon-email-signal-
vulnerability
NPR = LOL
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424dc6664b2a8a56989736@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on
Signal from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an
open-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and
others who seek more privacy than other text-messaging
services are capable of delivering. I assumed that the
Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s
national security adviser.
me,did not assume, however, that the request was from the
actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though
I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might be
reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump
administration?
entrapcontentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s
periodic fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed
my mind that someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order
to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious
actors to try to induce journalists to share information
that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal"app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
mean?
A lie.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be part
of a chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying?
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
What is your evidence he was lying?
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified info
was discussed.
Facts say otherwise.
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424dc68ee935e3d989737 @usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vs13vo$1vk0v$1@dont-email.me>, bax02@news.mixmin.net:
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:vrvs9q$2ucm1$1
the
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don??t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in
inadvertentlyeyes. He??s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic??s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I??ve ever read. Donald Trump??s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently
archivedinvited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several senior
Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio
and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being
whatfor posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for
hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows
NOTelse.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would
be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi network.=============
"A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal Messenger
Application," begins the department-wide email, dated March 18 and
obtained by NPR.
The memo continues, "Russian professional hacking groups are employing
the 'linked devices' features to spy on encrypted conversations." It
notes that Google has identified Russian hacking groups that are
"targeting Signal Messenger to spy on persons of interest."
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1-5339801/pentagon-email-signal-
vulnerability
NPR = LOL
Lots of other sources say the same.
In article <vs1eqe$2930f$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424dc6664b2a8a56989736@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02Facts say otherwise.
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on
Signal from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an >>>>>>>>>> open-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and
others who seek more privacy than other text-messaging
services are capable of delivering. I assumed that the
Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s
national security adviser.
me,did not assume, however, that the request was from the
actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though >>>>>>>>>> I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might be
reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump
administration?
entrapcontentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s
periodic fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed >>>>>>>>>> my mind that someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order >>>>>>>>>> to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious
actors to try to induce journalists to share information
that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal"app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
mean?
A lie.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be part
of a chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying?
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
What is your evidence he was lying?
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified info
was discussed.
But you can't provide them. Why is that?
On 26/3/25 11:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs1eqe$2930f$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424dc6664b2a8a56989736@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02Facts say otherwise.
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on >>>>>>>>>> Signal from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an >>>>>>>>>> open-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and >>>>>>>>>> others who seek more privacy than other text-messaging
services are capable of delivering. I assumed that the
Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s
national security adviser.
me,did not assume, however, that the request was from the
actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though >>>>>>>>>> I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might be
reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump
administration?
entrapcontentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s
periodic fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed >>>>>>>>>> my mind that someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order >>>>>>>>>> to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious
actors to try to induce journalists to share information >>>>>>>>>> that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal"app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
mean?
A lie.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be part >>>> of a chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying?
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
What is your evidence he was lying?
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified info
was discussed.
But you can't provide them. Why is that?
You cannot find the published transcripts either.
In article <vs1eqe$2930f$1@dont-email.me>, bax02an
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424dc6664b2a8a56989736@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on
Signal from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is
thoughsourceopen-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and
others who seek more privacy than other text-messaging
services are capable of delivering. I assumed that the
Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s
national security adviser.
did not assume, however, that the request was from the
actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and
crossedme,I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might be
reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump
administration?
contentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s
periodic fixation on me specifically. It immediately
ordermy mind that someone could be masquerading as Waltz in
partentrapto somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious
actors to try to induce journalists to share information
that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal"app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
mean?
A lie.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be
Facts say otherwise.of a chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying?
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
What is your evidence he was lying?
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified info
was discussed.
But you can't provide them. Why is that?
In article <vs1es5$2930f$2@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424dc68ee935e3d989737
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vs13vo$1vk0v$1@dont-email.me>, bax02@news.mixmin.net:
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:vrvs9q$2ucm1$1
the
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don??t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members
in
inadvertentlyeyes. He??s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic??s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of
the most extraordinary stories I??ve ever read. Donald
Trump??s national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently
archivedinvited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several
senior Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance,
Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being
whatfor posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around
for hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows
NOTelse.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians
would
be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi=============
network.
"A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal Messenger
Application," begins the department-wide email, dated March 18 and
obtained by NPR.
The memo continues, "Russian professional hacking groups are
employing the 'linked devices' features to spy on encrypted
conversations." It notes that Google has identified Russian
hacking groups that are "targeting Signal Messenger to spy on
persons of interest."
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1-5339801/pentagon-email-signal-
vulnerability
NPR = LOL
Lots of other sources say the same.
Left leaning sources.
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:vrvs9q$2ucm1$1@news.mixmin.net:
Baxter wrote:=============
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several senior
Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio
and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for
hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows what
else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would NOT
be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi network.
"A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal Messenger
Application," begins the department-wide email, dated March 18 and
obtained by NPR.
The memo continues, "Russian professional hacking groups are employing
the 'linked devices' features to spy on encrypted conversations." It
notes that Google has identified Russian hacking groups that are
"targeting Signal Messenger to spy on persons of interest."
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1-5339801/pentagon-email-signal- vulnerability
On 3/26/2025 8:23 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag and subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Baxter wrote:
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:vrvs9q$2ucm1$1@news.mixmin.net:
Baxter wrote:=============
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the >>>>>>> eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the >>>>>>> most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently >>>>>>> invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several senior
Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio >>>>>>> and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived >>>>>> for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for
hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows what >>>>> else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would NOT >>>> be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi network.
"A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal Messenger
Application," begins the department-wide email, dated March 18 and
obtained by NPR.
The memo continues, "Russian professional hacking groups are employing
the 'linked devices' features to spy on encrypted conversations." It
notes that Google has identified Russian hacking groups that are
"targeting Signal Messenger to spy on persons of interest."
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1-5339801/pentagon-email-signal-
vulnerability
This exploit is completely different from listening in over a WiFi network.
No, you dickless cocksucker, it isn't.
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424df79b9978545898975b@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vs1eqe$2930f$1@dont-email.me>, bax02an
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424dc6664b2a8a56989736@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on
Signal from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is
thoughsourceopen-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and
others who seek more privacy than other text-messaging
services are capable of delivering. I assumed that the
Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s
national security adviser.
did not assume, however, that the request was from the
actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and
crossedme,I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might be
reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump
administration?
contentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s
periodic fixation on me specifically. It immediately
ordermy mind that someone could be masquerading as Waltz in
partentrapto somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious
actors to try to induce journalists to share information
that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal"app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
mean?
A lie.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be
Facts say otherwise.of a chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying?
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
What is your evidence he was lying?
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified info
was discussed.
But you can't provide them. Why is that?
Skeeter-bot finds his facts with his hands behind his back.
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424df7b9b0f252b698975c@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vs1es5$2930f$2@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424dc68ee935e3d989737
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vs13vo$1vk0v$1@dont-email.me>, bax02@news.mixmin.net:
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:vrvs9q$2ucm1$1
the
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don??t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members
in
inadvertentlyeyes. He??s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic??s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of
the most extraordinary stories I??ve ever read. Donald
Trump??s national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently
archivedinvited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several
senior Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance,
Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being
whatfor posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around
for hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows
NOTelse.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians
would
be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi=============
network.
"A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal Messenger
Application," begins the department-wide email, dated March 18 and
obtained by NPR.
The memo continues, "Russian professional hacking groups are
employing the 'linked devices' features to spy on encrypted
conversations." It notes that Google has identified Russian
hacking groups that are "targeting Signal Messenger to spy on
persons of interest."
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1-5339801/pentagon-email-signal-
vulnerability
NPR = LOL
Lots of other sources say the same.
Left leaning sources.
Skeeter-bot has one foot shorter than the other.
Baxter wrote:
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in
news:vrvs9q$2ucm1$1@news.mixmin.net:
Baxter wrote:=============
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in
the eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently
inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat
(Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include
several senior Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD
Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being
archived for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for
hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows
what else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would
NOT be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi
network.
"A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal Messenger
Application," begins the department-wide email, dated March 18 and
obtained by NPR.
The memo continues, "Russian professional hacking groups are
employing the 'linked devices' features to spy on encrypted
conversations." It notes that Google has identified Russian hacking
groups that are "targeting Signal Messenger to spy on persons of
interest."
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1-5339801/pentagon-email-signal-
vulnerability
This exploit is completely different from listening in over a WiFi
network.
J Carlson wrote:
On 3/26/2025 8:23 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag and >> subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Baxter wrote:No, you dickless cocksucker, it isn't.
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:vrvs9q$2ucm1$1@news.mixmin.net: >>>>
Baxter wrote:=============
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the >>>>>>>> eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the >>>>>>>> most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently >>>>>>>> invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several senior >>>>>>>> Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio >>>>>>>> and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived >>>>>>> for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for >>>>>> hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows what >>>>>> else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would NOT >>>>> be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi network.
"A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal Messenger
Application," begins the department-wide email, dated March 18 and
obtained by NPR.
The memo continues, "Russian professional hacking groups are employing >>>> the 'linked devices' features to spy on encrypted conversations." It
notes that Google has identified Russian hacking groups that are
"targeting Signal Messenger to spy on persons of interest."
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1-5339801/pentagon-email-signal-
vulnerability
This exploit is completely different from listening in over a WiFi network. >>
Yes it is,
stupid shit Jonathan David Ball:
In article <vs2dms$351vk$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter-bot has one foot shorter than the other.
This is what I have reduced you to.
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424ef0d3fec783c798979d@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vs2dms$351vk$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter-bot has one foot shorter than the other.
This is what I have reduced you to.
LOL - Skeeter-bot doesn't understand that's saying he leans. You might say he's fallen over.
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax021 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal" mean?
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal
from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-source
encrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others
who seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are
capable of delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in
question was President Donald Trump?s national security adviser. I >>>>>> did not assume, however, that the request was from the actual
Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though I didn?t
find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to me,
I did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?s
contentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic
fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that
someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow entrap
me. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious actors to
try to induce journalists to share information that could be used
against them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using Signal
app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
A lie.
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don�t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the >>>>> eyes. He�s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic�s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the >>>>> most extraordinary stories I�ve ever read. Donald Trump�s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted >>>>> messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason.
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
No they didn't.
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the Kremlin's
guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for hours? Probably
pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows what
else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would NOT be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi network.
On 3/25/2025 8:05 AM, Baxter wrote:
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal from a
user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-source encrypted
messaging service popular with journalists and others who seek more
privacy than other text-messaging services are capable of delivering. I
assumed that the Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump’s
national security adviser. I did not assume, however, that the request
was from the actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though
I didn’t find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to
me, I did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration’s
contentious relationship with journalists—and Trump’s periodic fixation >> on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that someone could be
masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow entrap me. It is not at all
uncommon these days for nefarious actors to try to induce journalists to
share information that could be used against them.
Have you considered that this was done on purpose, knowing Goldberg
would make an ass out of himself crowing about useless information?
Because that's sure what happened.
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02Attack plans if not actually classified are still supposed to be closely
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal >>>>>>>> from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others >>>>>>>> who seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are
capable of delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in
question was President Donald Trump?s national security adviser.
me,did not assume, however, that the request was from the actual
Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though I didn?t >>>>>>>> find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?
entrapcontentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic >>>>>>>> fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that >>>>>>>> someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious actors to >>>>>>>> try to induce journalists to share information that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal" mean?app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
A lie.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be part of a
chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying? What
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
is your evidence he was lying?
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified info
was discussed.
On 2025-03-25 03:59, Skeeter wrote:Waltz invited him into it.
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
Is that your new excuse?
How did Jeffrey Goldberg get into the chat group, then?
In article <vrvsqs$p0d2$7@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Lou Ribano <lribano@gmx32.com> wrote in
news:vrvdgc$frv$4@toxic.dizum.net:
On 24 Mar 2025, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> posted some
news:vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don�t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He�s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic�s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I�ve ever read.
Goldberg is a smarmy POS who hates Trump and is in the position to
deliver his opinion to a narrow slice of the population.
If there is a gold lining to this, Goldberg just proved that he can be
easily manipulated and should never be trusted by any government
officials.
Putin was listening in - he's hacked Signal. Why are we discussing war
plans on Signal?
Prove they did. I bet you can't.
On 2025-03-26 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal >>>>>>>>> from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others >>>>>>>>> who seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are >>>>>>>>> capable of delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in
question was President Donald Trump?s national security adviser.
me,did not assume, however, that the request was from the actual >>>>>>>>> Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though I didn?t >>>>>>>>> find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?
entrapcontentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic >>>>>>>>> fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that >>>>>>>>> someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious actors to >>>>>>>>> try to induce journalists to share information that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal" mean?app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
A lie.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be part of a >>> chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying? What >>> is your evidence he was lying?
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified info
was discussed.
Attack plans if not actually classified are still supposed to be closely held.
Look up the "Espionage Act" and "national defence information".
On 2025-03-25 20:28, Anonymous wrote:
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted >>>>> messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump officials, >>>>> including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the Kremlin's
guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for hours? Probably >>> pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows what
else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would NOT be
reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi network.
Really?
And you're sure that encryption can't have been broken?
On 3/26/2025 9:01 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag and subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
J Carlson wrote:
On 3/26/2025 8:23 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag and
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Baxter wrote:
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:vrvs9q$2ucm1$1@news.mixmin.net: >>>>>
Baxter wrote:=============
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the >>>>>>>>> eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader. >>>>>>>>>
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the >>>>>>>>> most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s >>>>>>>>> national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently >>>>>>>>> invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several senior >>>>>>>>> Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio >>>>>>>>> and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived >>>>>>>> for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for >>>>>>> hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows what >>>>>>> else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would NOT >>>>>> be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi network. >>>>>>
"A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal Messenger
Application," begins the department-wide email, dated March 18 and
obtained by NPR.
The memo continues, "Russian professional hacking groups are employing >>>>> the 'linked devices' features to spy on encrypted conversations." It >>>>> notes that Google has identified Russian hacking groups that are
"targeting Signal Messenger to spy on persons of interest."
https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1-5339801/pentagon-email-signal-
vulnerability
This exploit is completely different from listening in over a WiFi network.
No, you dickless cocksucker, it isn't.
Yes it is,
No, you cocksucking squat-to-piss Nazi filth, it isn't.
stupid shit Jonathan David Ball:
No such poster, you squat-to-piss Nazi filth, as you well know.
On 2025-03-25 20:28, Anonymous wrote:
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several senior
Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio
and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for
hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows what
else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would
NOT be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi
network.
Really?
And you're sure that encryption can't have been broken?
On 2025-03-25 03:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
Is that your new excuse?
How did Jeffrey Goldberg get into the chat group, then?
Alan wrote:
On 2025-03-25 20:28, Anonymous wrote:
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in
the eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently
inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat
(Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include
several senior Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD
Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being
archived for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for
hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows
what else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would
NOT be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi
network.
Really?
And you're sure that encryption can't have been broken?
It's highly unlikely the Russians or others have broken the actual
encryption algorithms. They would therefore have to rely on exploiting
other potential vulnerabilities in the software or the user's device,
or perhaps by tricking the Signal user into granting them some form of
access to the encrypted messages.
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:vs53me$39aq9$1@news.mixmin.net:Real
Alan wrote:Nah, they just become a "linked device" and follow the conversation
On 2025-03-25 20:28, Anonymous wrote:
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in
the eyes. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader. >>>>>>>
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the >>>>>>> most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. Donald Trump’s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently
inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat
(Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include
several senior Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD
Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being
archived for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for
hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows
what else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would
NOT be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi
network.
Really?
And you're sure that encryption can't have been broken?
It's highly unlikely the Russians or others have broken the actual
encryption algorithms. They would therefore have to rely on exploiting
other potential vulnerabilities in the software or the user's device,
or perhaps by tricking the Signal user into granting them some form of
access to the encrypted messages.
Time.
On 2025-03-25 03:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
Is that your new excuse?
How did Jeffrey Goldberg get into the chat group, then?
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in news:vs4sjh$1h3e9$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-25 03:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
Is that your new excuse?
How did Jeffrey Goldberg get into the chat group, then?
Skeeter is an AI bot - he can't answer, it's not part of his programming.
On 2025-03-27 17:35, norm wrote:
On 3/25/2025 8:05 AM, Baxter wrote:
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal from a
user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-source encrypted
messaging service popular with journalists and others who seek more
privacy than other text-messaging services are capable of delivering. I
assumed that the Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s
national security adviser. I did not assume, however, that the request
was from the actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though >> I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to
me, I did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?s
contentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic fixation
on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that someone could be >> masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow entrap me. It is not at all
uncommon these days for nefarious actors to try to induce journalists to >> share information that could be used against them.
Have you considered that this was done on purpose, knowing Goldberg
would make an ass out of himself crowing about useless information?
Because that's sure what happened.
A whole bunch of Republicans think it is VERY serious.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in news:vs4sq0$1h3e9$5@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-25 20:28, Anonymous wrote:
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the >>>>> eyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently >>>>> invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several senior
Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio
and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for
hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows what
else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would
NOT be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi
network.
Really?
And you're sure that encryption can't have been broken?
They don't need to intercept signal ane/or break encryption. They become
a "linked device" and read the conversation Real Time.
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:vs53me$39aq9$1@news.mixmin.net:
Alan wrote:
On 2025-03-25 20:28, Anonymous wrote:
Baxter wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote in
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in
the eyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a military leader. >>>>>>
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the >>>>>> most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently
inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat
(Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include
several senior Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD
Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being
archived for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
=============
@ColbyBadhwar
What are the chances that Witkoff connected his phone to the
Kremlin's guest wifi network while Putin had him waiting around for
hours? Probably pretty high.
So the Russians have been reading that group chat and God knows
what else.
All messages using Signal are end-to-end encrypted. Russians would
NOT be reading those group chat messages using their own WiFi
network.
Really?
And you're sure that encryption can't have been broken?
It's highly unlikely the Russians or others have broken the actual encryption algorithms. They would therefore have to rely on exploiting other potential vulnerabilities in the software or the user's device,
or perhaps by tricking the Signal user into granting them some form of access to the encrypted messages.
Nah, they just become a "linked device" and follow the conversation Real Time.
On 2025-03-26 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal >>>>>>>> from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others >>>>>>>> who seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are >>>>>>>> capable of delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in
question was President Donald Trump?s national security adviser.
me,did not assume, however, that the request was from the actual >>>>>>>> Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though I didn?t >>>>>>>> find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?
entrapcontentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic >>>>>>>> fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that >>>>>>>> someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious actors to >>>>>>>> try to induce journalists to share information that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal" mean?app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
A lie.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be part of a >> chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying? What
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
is your evidence he was lying?
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified infoAttack plans if not actually classified are still supposed to be closely held.
was discussed.
Look up the "Espionage Act" and "national defence information".
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the >>>>> eyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently >>>>> invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted >>>>> messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete >>>>> Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong because of it. My >>> guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason.
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
No they didn't.
Yes... ...they really did.
On 2025-03-26 03:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvsqs$p0d2$7@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Lou Ribano <lribano@gmx32.com> wrote in
news:vrvdgc$frv$4@toxic.dizum.net:
On 24 Mar 2025, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> posted some
news:vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read.
Goldberg is a smarmy POS who hates Trump and is in the position to
deliver his opinion to a narrow slice of the population.
If there is a gold lining to this, Goldberg just proved that he can be >>> easily manipulated and should never be trusted by any government
officials.
Putin was listening in - he's hacked Signal. Why are we discussing war >> plans on Signal?
Prove they did. I bet you can't.
According to your rules, it's up to you to prove they didn't.
In article <CHmFP.126396$f5K3.60184@fx36.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/27/2025 6:04 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-03-25 03:59, Skeeter wrote:Waltz invited him into it.
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
Is that your new excuse?
How did Jeffrey Goldberg get into the chat group, then?
No
In article <vs4soq$1h3e9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-27 17:35, norm wrote:
On 3/25/2025 8:05 AM, Baxter wrote:
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal from a >>>> user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-source encrypted
messaging service popular with journalists and others who seek more
privacy than other text-messaging services are capable of delivering. I >>>> assumed that the Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s >>>> national security adviser. I did not assume, however, that the request >>>> was from the actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though >>>> I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to >>>> me, I did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?s
contentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic fixation >>>> on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that someone could be >>>> masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow entrap me. It is not at all
uncommon these days for nefarious actors to try to induce journalists to >>>> share information that could be used against them.
Have you considered that this was done on purpose, knowing Goldberg
would make an ass out of himself crowing about useless information?
Because that's sure what happened.
A whole bunch of Republicans think it is VERY serious.
Like who?
In article <vs4soq$1h3e9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-27 17:35, norm wrote:
On 3/25/2025 8:05 AM, Baxter wrote:
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal from a >>>> user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-source encrypted
messaging service popular with journalists and others who seek more
privacy than other text-messaging services are capable of delivering. I >>>> assumed that the Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s >>>> national security adviser. I did not assume, however, that the request >>>> was from the actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though >>>> I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to >>>> me, I did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?s
contentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic fixation >>>> on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that someone could be >>>> masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow entrap me. It is not at all
uncommon these days for nefarious actors to try to induce journalists to >>>> share information that could be used against them.
Have you considered that this was done on purpose, knowing Goldberg
would make an ass out of himself crowing about useless information?
Because that's sure what happened.
A whole bunch of Republicans think it is VERY serious.
Like who?
In article <vs4sn7$1h3e9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-26 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02Attack plans if not actually classified are still supposed to be closely
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal >>>>>>>>>> from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-
me,encrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others >>>>>>>>>> who seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are >>>>>>>>>> capable of delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in >>>>>>>>>> question was President Donald Trump?s national security adviser. >>>> I
did not assume, however, that the request was from the actual >>>>>>>>>> Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though I didn?t >>>>>>>>>> find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to
entrapI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration? >>>> s
contentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic >>>>>>>>>> fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that >>>>>>>>>> someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious actors to >>>>>>>>>> try to induce journalists to share information that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
A lie.1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal" mean? >>>>>app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be part of a >>>> chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying? What >>>> is your evidence he was lying?
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified info
was discussed.
held.
Look up the "Espionage Act" and "national defence information".
No need. If they were so secret why did the Atlantic
publish them?
In article <CHmFP.126396$f5K3.60184@fx36.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/27/2025 6:04 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-03-25 03:59, Skeeter wrote:Waltz invited him into it.
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
Is that your new excuse?
How did Jeffrey Goldberg get into the chat group, then?
No
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don�t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the >>>>>>> eyes. He�s just blown his credibility as a military leader. >>>>>>>
On Monday, The Atlantic�s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the >>>>>>> most extraordinary stories I�ve ever read. Donald Trump�s >>>>>>> national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently >>>>>>> invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted >>>>>>> messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete >>>>>>> Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived >>>>>> for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong because of it. My >>>>> guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason.
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
No they didn't.
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.42504cd49ede37419897dd@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <CHmFP.126396$f5K3.60184@fx36.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/27/2025 6:04 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-03-25 03:59, Skeeter wrote:Waltz invited him into it.
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
Is that your new excuse?
How did Jeffrey Goldberg get into the chat group, then?
No
Skeeter-bot stupidity is to laugh at.
On 2025-03-28 06:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4soq$1h3e9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-27 17:35, norm wrote:
On 3/25/2025 8:05 AM, Baxter wrote:
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal from a >>>> user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-source encrypted >>>> messaging service popular with journalists and others who seek more
privacy than other text-messaging services are capable of delivering. I >>>> assumed that the Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s >>>> national security adviser. I did not assume, however, that the request >>>> was from the actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though
I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to >>>> me, I did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration?s >>>> contentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic fixation >>>> on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that someone could be >>>> masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow entrap me. It is not at all >>>> uncommon these days for nefarious actors to try to induce journalists to >>>> share information that could be used against them.
Have you considered that this was done on purpose, knowing Goldberg
would make an ass out of himself crowing about useless information?
Because that's sure what happened.
A whole bunch of Republicans think it is VERY serious.
Like who?
Like Senate Armed Services Chair, Roger Wicker, Republican Senator from Mississippi:
'?This chat was alleged to have included classified information
pertaining to sensitive military actions in Yemen,? they wrote. ?If
true, this reporting raises questions as to the use of unclassified
networks to discuss sensitive and classified information, as well as the sharing of such information with those who do not have proper clearance
and need to know.?'
<https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5218725-trump-administration-signal-controversy/>
On 2025-03-28 06:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sn7$1h3e9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-26 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02Attack plans if not actually classified are still supposed to be closely >> held.
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal >>>>>>>>>> from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an open-
me,encrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others >>>>>>>>>> who seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are >>>>>>>>>> capable of delivering. I assumed that the Michael Waltz in >>>>>>>>>> question was President Donald Trump?s national security adviser. >>>> I
did not assume, however, that the request was from the actual >>>>>>>>>> Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though I didn?t >>>>>>>>>> find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to
entrapI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration? >>>> s
contentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s periodic >>>>>>>>>> fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed my mind that >>>>>>>>>> someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious actors to >>>>>>>>>> try to induce journalists to share information that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
A lie.1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal" mean? >>>>>app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be part of a
chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying? What >>>> is your evidence he was lying?
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified info
was discussed.
Look up the "Espionage Act" and "national defence information".
No need. If they were so secret why did the Atlantic
publish them?
Because it was important to show that the administration was lying about
what happened...
...and while sensitive BEFORE the attack, it really doesn't hurt
anything to reveal it after.
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> posted some >>>>> news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the >>>>>>> eyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the >>>>>>> most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently >>>>>>> invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted >>>>>>> messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete >>>>>>> Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived >>>>>> for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong because of it. My >>>>> guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason.
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
No they didn't.
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
On 2025-03-28 06:06, Skeeter wrote:
In article <CHmFP.126396$f5K3.60184@fx36.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/27/2025 6:04 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-03-25 03:59, Skeeter wrote:Waltz invited him into it.
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
Is that your new excuse?
How did Jeffrey Goldberg get into the chat group, then?
No
And you know that from what source?
On 2025-03-28 06:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sn7$1h3e9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-26 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02Attack plans if not actually classified are still supposed to be
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on >>>>>>>>>>> Signal from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is an >>>>>>>>>>> open-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and >>>>>>>>>>> others who seek more privacy than other text-messaging
services are capable of delivering. I assumed that the
Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s
national security adviser.
me,did not assume, however, that the request was from the
actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and though >>>>>>>>>>> I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might be
reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump
administration?
entrapcontentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s
periodic fixation on me specifically. It immediately crossed >>>>>>>>>>> my mind that someone could be masquerading as Waltz in order >>>>>>>>>>> to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious
actors to try to induce journalists to share information >>>>>>>>>>> that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal"app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
mean?
A lie.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be
part of a chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was lying?
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
What is your evidence he was lying?
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified info
was discussed.
closely held.
Look up the "Espionage Act" and "national defence information".
No need. If they were so secret why did the Atlantic
publish them?
Because it was important to show that the administration was lying
about what happened...
...and while sensitive BEFORE the attack, it really doesn't hurt
anything to reveal it after.
In article <vs6dbf$2v80h$3@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.42504cd49ede37419897dd@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <CHmFP.126396$f5K3.60184@fx36.iad>,Skeeter-bot stupidity is to laugh at.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/27/2025 6:04 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2025-03-25 03:59, Skeeter wrote:Waltz invited him into it.
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
Is that your new excuse?
How did Jeffrey Goldberg get into the chat group, then?
No
I have reduced you to this. I love it.
In article <vs6kob$363bk$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 06:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sn7$1h3e9$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-26 08:08, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs14el$1vk0v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02Attack plans if not actually classified are still supposed to be
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424d8bc17a9fed36989725
@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrvrvr$p0d2$1@dont-email.me>, bax02source
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424cc0d54a7d01899896e1@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrv3m6$3jei$1@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c7800f70177439896c4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrugnu$3hvr4$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424c3a7b9ad079ce9896aa@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vrtfaa$2l2q8$3@dont-email.me>,
invalide@invalid.invalid says...
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at
service members in the eyes. He?s just
blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary
stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg
to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an
encrypted messaging app) that seemed to
include several senior Trump officials,
including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
No one invited anyone.
================
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on
Signal from a user identified as Michael Waltz. Signal is
an open-
Iencrypted messaging service popular with journalists and
others who seek more privacy than other text-messaging
services are capable of delivering. I assumed that the
Michael Waltz in question was President Donald Trump?s
national security adviser.
me,did not assume, however, that the request was from the
actual Michael Waltz. I have met him in the past, and
though I didn?t find it particularly strange that he might
be reaching out to
sI did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump
administration?
entrapcontentious relationship with journalists?and Trump?s
periodic fixation on me specifically. It immediately
crossed my mind that someone could be masquerading as
Waltz in order to somehow
usedme. It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious
actors to try to induce journalists to share information
that could be
Signalagainst them.
No one invited anyone.
Yeah, just happened - out of thin air. Spooky. Nobody
using
1 - then what does "I received a connection request on Signal"app, then suddenly this chat appears.
No one invited anyone. This is settled.
mean?
A lie.
Nope. That's how these messenger/chat apps work - you can't be
part of a chat without an invite.
He already told you he was invited. Why do you say he was
2 - if no invite, then how did he connect to the chat?
Ask him.
lying? What is your evidence he was lying?
What is your evidence he was invited. No classified info
was discussed.
closely held.
Look up the "Espionage Act" and "national defence information".
No need. If they were so secret why did the Atlantic
publish them?
Because it was important to show that the administration was lying
about what happened...
That's the excuse?
...and while sensitive BEFORE the attack, it really doesn't hurt
anything to reveal it after.
Still classified right?
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> posted
some news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members
in the eyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a military
leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of
the most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. Donald
Trump?s national security adviser, Michael Waltz,
apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal
group chat (Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that seemed
to include several senior Trump officials, including Stephen
Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being
archived for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong because of
it. My guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason.
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
No they didn't.
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don�t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He�s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic�s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I�ve ever read. Donald Trump�s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a reactive >>>>>>>>>>>>> journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
No they didn't.
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members in the
eyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a military leader. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the
most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a reactive >>>>>>>>>>>>> journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
No they didn't.
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was discussed
as "classified"
In article <vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
posted some news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service
members in the eyes. He?s just blown his
credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary stories
I?ve ever read. Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently
inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal group
chat (Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that
seemed to include several senior Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words
being archived for posterity... or read by their Dear
Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a
reactive journalist and often gets the overall picture
wrong because of it. My guess is they wanted to
embarrass him for some reason.
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
No they didn't.
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Case closed. Moving forward.
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.425762dacdcbff4d989a1b@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
posted some news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don??t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service
members in the eyes. He??s just blown his
credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic??s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary stories
I??ve ever read. Donald Trump??s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently
inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal group
chat (Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that
seemed to include several senior Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words
being archived for posterity... or read by their Dear
Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a
reactive journalist and often gets the overall picture
wrong because of it. My guess is they wanted to
embarrass him for some reason.
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
No they didn't.
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Case closed. Moving forward.
Nope, the investigation continues.
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> posted >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don�t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the
eyes. He�s just blown his credibility as a military >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic�s Jeffrey Goldberg published one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
most extraordinary stories I�ve ever read. Donald >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump�s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong because >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
No they didn't.
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was discussed as "classified"
In article <vsktgl$3e14j$6@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.425762dacdcbff4d989a1b@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
posted some news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don??t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service
members in the eyes. He??s just blown his
credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic??s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary stories
I??ve ever read. Donald Trump??s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently
inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal group
chat (Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that
seemed to include several senior Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco
Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words
being archived for posterity... or read by their Dear
Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a
reactive journalist and often gets the overall picture
wrong because of it. My guess is they wanted to
embarrass him for some reason.
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
No they didn't.
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Case closed. Moving forward.
Nope, the investigation continues.
Nope. It's a done deal. Now we move forward and put Tesla
vandals in jail for a long time.
"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message news:vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont- email.me...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
No they didn't.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don�t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> members in the
eyes. He�s just blown his credibility as a military >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic�s Jeffrey Goldberg published >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of the
most extraordinary stories I�ve ever read. Donald >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump�s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Yep, specific operational details, such as times of attack, are always classified.. at least until the mission is over.
Of course, the real person at fault here isn't even being discussed..
that would be who ever added that person to the chat group.
In article <vsktgl$3e14j$6@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.425762dacdcbff4d989a1b@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
No they didn't.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I donâ??t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> members in the eyes. Heâ??s just blown his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlanticâ??s Jeffrey Goldberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published one of the most extraordinary stories >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Iâ??ve ever read. Donald Trumpâ??s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal group >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chat (Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seemed to include several senior Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being archived for posterity... or read by their Dear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reactive journalist and often gets the overall picture >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong because of it. My guess is they wanted to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embarrass him for some reason.
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Case closed. Moving forward.
Nope, the investigation continues.
Nope. It's a done deal. Now we move forward and put Tesla
vandals in jail for a long time.
"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message news:vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont- email.me...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
No they didn't.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don�t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> members in the
eyes. He�s just blown his credibility as a military >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic�s Jeffrey Goldberg published >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of the
most extraordinary stories I�ve ever read. Donald >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump�s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Yep, specific operational details, such as times of attack, are always classified.. at least until the mission is over.
Of course, the real person at fault here isn't even being discussed..
that would be who ever added that person to the chat group.
"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message news:vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont-email.me...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
No they didn't.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> posted >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service members >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the
eyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a military >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg published one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. Donald >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco Rubio >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong because >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was discussed as "classified"
Yep, specific operational details, such as times of attack, are always classified.. at least until the mission is over.
Of course, the real person at fault here isn't even being discussed.. that would be who ever added that person to the chat group.
On 2025-04-03 06:06, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsktgl$3e14j$6@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.425762dacdcbff4d989a1b@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _spamblock@baxcode.com says...
No they didn't.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don??t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> members in the eyes. He??s just blown his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic??s Jeffrey Goldberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published one of the most extraordinary stories >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I??ve ever read. Donald Trump??s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal group >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chat (Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seemed to include several senior Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being archived for posterity... or read by their Dear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reactive journalist and often gets the overall picture >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong because of it. My guess is they wanted to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embarrass him for some reason.
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Case closed. Moving forward.
Nope, the investigation continues.
Nope. It's a done deal. Now we move forward and put Tesla
vandals in jail for a long time.
Yup.
<https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/02/waltzs-team-set-up-at-least-20-signal-group-chats-for-crises-across-the-world-00266845>
On 2025-04-03 09:23, Scout wrote:
"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message news:vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont- email.me...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
No they didn't.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> members in the
eyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a military >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg published >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of the
most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. Donald >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Yep, specific operational details, such as times of attack, are always classified.. at least until the mission is over.
Of course, the real person at fault here isn't even being discussed..
that would be who ever added that person to the chat group.
And everyone on that group chat is at fault for not immediately refusing
to discuss such information on Signal when someone in the group is not positively identified.
On 2025-04-03 09:23, Scout wrote:
"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message news:vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont- email.me...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
No they didn't.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> members in the
eyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a military >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg published >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of the
most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. Donald >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Yep, specific operational details, such as times of attack, are always classified.. at least until the mission is over.
Of course, the real person at fault here isn't even being discussed..
that would be who ever added that person to the chat group.
That would be Walz.
Scout wrote:
"Skeeter" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.425835c08743d6b5989a36@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article <vsktgl$3e14j$6@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.425762dacdcbff4d989a1b@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don??t know how Pete Hegseth can look at service >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> members in the eyes. He??s just blown his
credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic??s Jeffrey Goldberg
published one of the most extraordinary stories
I??ve ever read. Donald Trump??s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal
group
chat (Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that
seemed to include several senior Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rubio and Pete Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> being archived for posterity... or read by their Dear >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Leader.
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> reactive journalist and often gets the overall picture >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong because of it. My guess is they wanted to
embarrass him for some reason.
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans.
No they didn't.
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Case closed. Moving forward.
Nope, the investigation continues.
Nope. It's a done deal. Now we move forward and put Tesla
vandals in jail for a long time.
Tesla vandals.. people who worshipped Tesla and Musk just a few months
ago... until he started digging into liberal slush funding and shutting
it down.
Now, he's seen as little more than Satan.. to be taken down by any means
necessary. Odd that a man exposing governmental fraud and waste is
suddenly the 'bad guy'.
Looks like we now need teams of forensic accountants to start tracking
the money and where exactly it when and who was enriched by it.
Nobody worshiped Tesla.
Maybe people worship Musk. But I told Musk to his face that I loved all
his businesses except Tesla long before this happened.
I think he's gotten the message though. Let him rebuild Tesla. The Americans spoke. There's no need for further Tesla car burning.
Alan wrote:
On 2025-04-03 09:23, Scout wrote:
"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message news:vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont-
email.me...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
No they didn't.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don�t know how Pete Hegseth can look at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> service members in the
eyes. He�s just blown his credibility as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic�s Jeffrey Goldberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published one of the
most extraordinary stories I�ve ever read. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump�s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Yep, specific operational details, such as times of attack, are
always classified.. at least until the mission is over.
Of course, the real person at fault here isn't even being
discussed.. that would be who ever added that person to the chat
group.
That would be Walz.
Blaming the Democrats for the Republican fuck-up is just wrong.
Hegseth was put into place by Trump. Tim Walz had nothing to do with
this. Are you sure it wasn't Kamala you're thinking of? Or maybe
Biden added the person to the chat room with his 'leet hacking skills.
On 2025-04-03 09:23, Scout wrote:
"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message news:vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont-
email.me...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
No they didn't.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don�t know how Pete Hegseth can look at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> service members in the
eyes. He�s just blown his credibility as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic�s Jeffrey Goldberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published one of the
most extraordinary stories I�ve ever read. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump�s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marco Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Yep, specific operational details, such as times of attack, are
always classified.. at least until the mission is over.
Of course, the real person at fault here isn't even being discussed..
that would be who ever added that person to the chat group.
That would be Walz.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in news:vsmg82$16ubi$2@dont-email.me:
On 2025-04-03 09:23, Scout wrote:
"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message news:vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont-
email.me...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
No they didn't.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I donâ??t know how Pete Hegseth can look at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> service members in the
eyes. Heâ??s just blown his credibility as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> military leader.
On Monday, The Atlanticâ??s Jeffrey Goldberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published one of the
most extraordinary stories Iâ??ve ever read. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trumpâ??s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marco Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Yep, specific operational details, such as times of attack, are
always classified.. at least until the mission is over.
Of course, the real person at fault here isn't even being discussed..
that would be who ever added that person to the chat group.
That would be Walz.
Not Walz - Waltz - two different people, two different political parties.
=?UTF-8?Q?.../v]andrak|=e2=89=a1...?= <jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote in news:m57uteFdglgU1@mid.individual.net:
Alan wrote:
On 2025-04-03 09:23, Scout wrote:
"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message news:vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont-
email.me...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _spamblock@baxcode.com says...
No they didn't.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don�t know how Pete Hegseth can look at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> service members in the
eyes. He�s just blown his credibility as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic�s Jeffrey Goldberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published one of the
most extraordinary stories I�ve ever read. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump�s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now.
Oh!
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Yep, specific operational details, such as times of attack, are
always classified.. at least until the mission is over.
Of course, the real person at fault here isn't even being
discussed.. that would be who ever added that person to the chat
group.
That would be Walz.
Blaming the Democrats for the Republican fuck-up is just wrong.
Hegseth was put into place by Trump. Tim Walz had nothing to do with
this. Are you sure it wasn't Kamala you're thinking of? Or maybe
Biden added the person to the chat room with his 'leet hacking skills.
Different Waltz, asshole - this Waltz (Mike Waltz) is FL and appointed by tRump.
On 2025-04-03 14:10, Baxter wrote:
=?UTF-8?Q?.../v]andrak|=e2=89=a1...?= <jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote in news:m57uteFdglgU1@mid.individual.net:
Alan wrote:
On 2025-04-03 09:23, Scout wrote:
"Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote in message news:vska8l$2q1qa$2@dont-
email.me...
On 2025-03-31 18:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vsfc31$1le75$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-31 03:10, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vscq9g$2sguf$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-03-29 04:19, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs7gi8$3uc2a$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-28 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs6kpr$363bk$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>>> says...Oh!
On 2025-03-28 06:51, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs4sst$1h3e9$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-03-26 03:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrvs8l$p0d2$4@dont-email.me>, bax02 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _spamblock@baxcode.com says...
No they didn't.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2ADA24EEBA99002CE8@0.0.0.1:
On 25 Mar 2025, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted some
news:vru47q$371es$2@dont-email.me:
Gronk wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://archive.is/5mbng
I don?t know how Pete Hegseth can look at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> service members in the
eyes. He?s just blown his credibility as a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic?s Jeffrey Goldberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published one of the
most extraordinary stories I?ve ever read. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump?s
national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inadvertently
invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is an encrypted
messaging app) that seemed to include several senior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump
officials, including Stephen Miller, JD Vance, Marco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rubio and Pete
Hegseth.
Should have used SIPRNET.
But maybe, just maybe, they wanted avoid their words >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being archived
for posterity... or read by their Dear Leader. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Malicious or stupid? You decide.
Goldberg isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. He is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a reactive
journalist and often gets the overall picture wrong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of it. My
guess is they wanted to embarrass him for some reason. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Some embarrassment - they gave him secred war plans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes... ...they really did.
No they didn't. Stop lying.
Yes, they did.
You're trying to play semantic games.
Nothing top secret was discussed, moving forward now. >>>>>>>>>>>
Now it only matters if it was "TOP secret"!
I didn't say that. YOU did.
It's exactly what you said:
"Nothing top secret was discussed"
Yea and?
Implying that it only mattered if it was that.
What?
Is English not your first language?
Nothing classified. Case closed.
Tulsi Gabbard's own DoJ rules define the information that was
discussed as "classified"
Yep, specific operational details, such as times of attack, are
always classified.. at least until the mission is over.
Of course, the real person at fault here isn't even being
discussed.. that would be who ever added that person to the chat
group.
That would be Walz.
Blaming the Democrats for the Republican fuck-up is just wrong.
Hegseth was put into place by Trump. Tim Walz had nothing to do with
this. Are you sure it wasn't Kamala you're thinking of? Or maybe
Biden added the person to the chat room with his 'leet hacking skills.
Different Waltz, asshole - this Waltz (Mike Waltz) is FL and appointed by tRump.
Yeah... ...a typo is all it takes to throw them off.
:-)
Well liberal Democrats get angry and destructive when they aren't
getting their way.
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:vsml2e$1c6tn$3@dont-email.me:
Well liberal Democrats get angry and destructive when they aren't
getting their way.
Thus sayeth defenders of the Jan 6 rioters.
$30 Million In Damages From Pro-Trump Riot
FEBRUARY 24, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/bddt46jh
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:vsml2e$1c6tn$3@dont-email.me:
Well liberal Democrats get angry and destructive when they aren't
getting their way.
Thus sayeth defenders of the Jan 6 rioters.
$30 Million In Damages From Pro-Trump Riot
FEBRUARY 24, 2021
https://tinyurl.com/bddt46jh
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 498 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 67:44:06 |
| Calls: | 9,813 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 13,755 |
| Messages: | 6,189,352 |