• Re: RIP Rule Of Law

    From c186282@21:1/5 to pothead on Mon Apr 7 01:19:33 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics

    On 4/6/25 9:12 AM, pothead wrote:
    On 2025-04-06, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
    On 4/5/25 10:19 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
    Tariff on the north pole.


    YEA !!! :-)

    Actually, the tariffs apply to some extreme
    S.Pacific islands where 100% of the population
    is PENGUINS :-)

    DISENFRANCHISED penguins !!! They didn't get
    to vote on it.

    As for "rule of law", the WokieComs didn't give
    a fuckin' shit, so why should Trump ??? Part of
    his approved mission is to CRUSH the WokieComs.

    What ye sow .....

    Trump is following through on his campaign promises so I
    don't understand why the leftists are so upset.

    Oh, I understand why they're UPSET ...

    Just NOT why they think they have any
    moral high-ground ......

    Part of it is probably because it's eating them apart seeing
    Trump actually doing what he said he would do. That's very rare
    in politics.

    Trump IS unusually straight-up for a pol.

    He campaigned on this, SAID he'd do this, got
    ELECTED on this.

    Between the Wokies AND Trump though, I'm a bit
    worried about the "Rule Of Law" in the USA. For
    now, everybody is doing their best to go AROUND
    all that. History sez this is NOT always the
    best thing.

    On the flip - "law" - mostly represented by
    fellow-traveler judges - isn't REALLY 'law',
    just disguised hyper-partisanship. The judiciary
    cannot be allowed to negate any and everything
    the legislature/executive try to do or we
    effectively have a ONE branch govt.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)