• Dow futures jump 300 points as U.S. tariff exemptions boost tech stocks

    From More Tariffs!@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 14 15:19:48 2025
    XPost: or.politics, sac.politics, talk.politics.guns
    XPost: talk.politics.misc

    Stock futures rose Monday as a surprise U.S. tariff exemption from
    President Donald Trump gave tech names a lift to start the week.

    Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    climbed 390 points, or nearly 1%. S&P 500 futures
    gained 1.4%, while Nasdaq-100 futures
    moved 1.6% higher.

    Trump exempted smartphones and computers as well as other devices and components like semiconductors from his new “reciprocal” tariffs,
    according to new U.S. Customs and Border Protection guidance issued late Friday.

    Apple
    shares popped more than 5% in the premarket on the news, while Nvidia
    gained 2%. The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) traded 2.1% higher before the bell.

    However, those advances may be held in check after Trump and his Commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, then suggested Sunday that the exemptions
    aren’t permanent, stirring up more tariff uncertainty. Trump said in a
    Truth Social post that these products are still “subject to the existing
    20% Fentanyl Tariffs, and they are just moving to a different Tariff
    ‘bucket.’”

    The developments come as shares of the “Magnificent Seven” have come under pressure in the wake of the president’s “liberation day” tariff
    announcement earlier this month.

    The CNBC Magnificent 7 Index has declined about 5% since then. Apple
    has notably been among the hardest hit names, as the iPhone maker lost
    nearly $640 billion in market cap in the three trading days following the announcement.

    Last week marked one of the most volatile trading weeks on record for the Street. The CBOE Volatility Index
    spiked above 50 on Thursday, with stocks giving up some of their historic gains seen a day earlier. On Wednesday, the market soared after Trump
    announced a 90-day reprieve for a number of his new tariff rates, seeing
    its third-biggest one-day gain since World War II.

    “The mid-week delay on some non-China tariffs, along with solid banks
    earnings and optimism about Fed intervention (should it be needed) at the
    end of the week helped fuel the gains in US equities, with some also attributing Wednesday’s bounce to short covering,” said Lori Calvasina,
    head of U.S. equity strategy at RBC Capital Markets. “For the moment, this seems to have offset the concerns that emerged about the bond market and recession worries.”

    Despite last week’s rally, all three major averages are still down sharply since the so-called reciprocal tariffs were announced. The S&P 500
    has dropped 5.4%, while the Nasdaq Composite
    and Dow Jones Industrial Average
    have fallen about 5% and 4.8%, respectively.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/13/stock-market-today-live-updates.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From c186282@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 14 13:45:12 2025
    XPost: or.politics, sac.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    "Futures" are just GUESSES really. A week ago they
    all showed doom. One or two little policy tweaks
    by Trump and now they're all different. Some trader
    in Tokyo farts in public and the 'future' will look
    all different again.

    Economies are almost impossible to model. WAY too
    many butterflies. "Climate" is probably simpler.

    Alice liked to believe in six impossible things
    before breakfast and I think vast quantities of
    people/entities playing the markets do the same.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From c186282@21:1/5 to DoD on Mon Apr 14 16:28:41 2025
    XPost: or.politics, sac.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 4/14/25 2:29 PM, DoD wrote:
    On 4/14/2025 10:45 AM, c186282 wrote:
    "Futures" are just GUESSES really.

    No, they're not, you fucking moron. They are legally binding contracts.
    Yes, the two parties are speculating about the future price of the
    asset, but it is not uninformed speculation, as yours would be.

    Hmmmmmmm ... yet those 'futures' - which they oft extend
    out a YEAR - fuckin' CHANGE almost daily. Sounds a lot
    more like 'speculation' than some grand math model.

    Economies are almost impossible to model.

    Complete bullshit. Many forecasting models have robust track records of accuracy.

    Stop bullshit about stuff you don't know anything about.

    Ummmm ... I may not be the guilty party here ......

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)