Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To Have Due
Process And Stay In America?
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 15:29:15 -0700, Alan says...Until you change it, it is the law of the land.
On 2025-04-14 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To Have
Due Process And Stay In America?
Because every "person" is guaranteed it by the US constitution.
Bu bu but it'ssss a living Constitution, open for amending and interpretation, sayeth the liberals.
It's an old out-of-date document. We can change it.
There.
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:40:02 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-14 16:13, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 15:29:15 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-14 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To
Have Due Process And Stay In America?
Because every "person" is guaranteed it by the US
constitution.
Bu bu but it'ssss a living Constitution, open for amending and
interpretation, sayeth the liberals.
It's an old out-of-date document. We can change it.
There.
What if 20 million Mexicans crossed YOUR borders, would you grant
each and every one of them "due process", knowing it would cost
Canadians ONE TRILLION DOLLARS?
Methinks your fellow Canadians would NOT go for that.
Rounding up all illegal immigrants and providing them with trials
could cost governments nearly $1 trillion, with estimates suggesting
at least $88 billion per year for processing and removal of one
million undocumented immigrants. Additionally, the current
immigration court system would require significant expansion to
handle the backlog of cases, further increasing costs.
Fuck you Canadian, unless YOU, rich boy, wanna help us pay for that.
Until you change it, it is the law of the land.
Show us the law where illegal invaders get due process.
Make sure the language is correct, because I can't find it.
Not in the Constitution, anyway.
"Illegal Immigrant" - Phrase not found.
"Illegal Alien" - Phrase not found.
"Invader" - phrase not found (see below)
Don't bother with he 5th.
"Just because you don't see a judge doesn't mean you aren't
receiving due process."
In some cases, immigrants are not granted a hearing at all. When
asked about the president's tweet, White House Press Secretary Sarah
Sanders pointed to the process of "expedited removal," which was
created by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act of 1996.
Under the expedited removal process, immigrants who have been in the
country illegally for less than two years and are apprehended within
100 miles of the border can be deported almost immediately without
going through a court hearing.
WHO was President in 1996?
On 2025-04-14 17:35, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:40:02 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-14 16:13, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 15:29:15 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-14 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To
Have Due Process And Stay In America?
Because every "person" is guaranteed it by the US
constitution.
Bu bu but it'ssss a living Constitution, open for amending and
interpretation, sayeth the liberals.
It's an old out-of-date document. We can change it.
There.
What if 20 million Mexicans crossed YOUR borders, would you grant
each and every one of them "due process", knowing it would cost
Canadians ONE TRILLION DOLLARS?
Let's deal with a crap ton of your bullshit.
First of all, there aren't "20 million Mexicans" illegal immigrants in
the US. There aren't even 20 million illegal immigrants in total.
In 2022, the DHS estimated that there were about 11 million.
"In summary, the Office of Homeland Security Statistics (OHSS) estimates
11.0 million unauthorized immigrants were living in the United States on January 1, 2022"
<https://web.archive.org/web/20240515161826/https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-05/2024_0418_ohss_estimates-of-the-unauthorized-immigrant-population-residing-in-the-united-states-january-2018?january-2022.pdf>
(And naturally, that PDF disappeared from the DHS website when Trump's
junta came to power).
Secondly, Biden managed to deport more illegal immigrants during his
term and Trump did during his first term.
Methinks your fellow Canadians would NOT go for that.
Rounding up all illegal immigrants and providing them with trials
could cost governments nearly $1 trillion, with estimates suggesting
at least $88 billion per year for processing and removal of one
million undocumented immigrants. Additionally, the current
immigration court system would require significant expansion to
handle the backlog of cases, further increasing costs.
Let's do a little arithmetic for you:
$88 billion / 1 million = $88,000 per person.
Now divide $1 trillion by $88,000 and you get:
11,363,636
So you were bright enough to notice that your copied and pasted source
here contradicts that "20 million" figure you claimed above.
Fuck you Canadian, unless YOU, rich boy, wanna help us pay for that.
Until you change it, it is the law of the land.
Show us the law where illegal invaders get due process.
5th amendment: "no PERSON"
Make sure the language is correct, because I can't find it.
Not in the Constitution, anyway.
"Illegal Immigrant" - Phrase not found.
"Illegal Alien" - Phrase not found.
"Invader" - phrase not found (see below)
Don't bother with he 5th.
Why because you don't like that it says "person"?
"Just because you don't see a judge doesn't mean you aren't
receiving due process."
In some cases, immigrants are not granted a hearing at all. When
asked about the president's tweet, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders pointed to the process of "expedited removal," which was
created by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act of 1996.
Under the expedited removal process, immigrants who have been in the country illegally for less than two years and are apprehended within
100 miles of the border can be deported almost immediately without
going through a court hearing.
WHO was President in 1996?
I don't care.
If a law is in conflict with the US constitution, the law loses.
(And no one is impressed with your ability to copy and paste).
In article <vtma07$57th$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-14 17:35, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:40:02 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-14 16:13, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 15:29:15 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-14 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To
Have Due Process And Stay In America?
Because every "person" is guaranteed it by the US
constitution.
Bu bu but it'ssss a living Constitution, open for amending and
interpretation, sayeth the liberals.
It's an old out-of-date document. We can change it.
There.
What if 20 million Mexicans crossed YOUR borders, would you grant
each and every one of them "due process", knowing it would cost
Canadians ONE TRILLION DOLLARS?
Let's deal with a crap ton of your bullshit.
First of all, there aren't "20 million Mexicans" illegal immigrants in
the US. There aren't even 20 million illegal immigrants in total.
In 2022, the DHS estimated that there were about 11 million.
"In summary, the Office of Homeland Security Statistics (OHSS) estimates
11.0 million unauthorized immigrants were living in the United States on
January 1, 2022"
<https://web.archive.org/web/20240515161826/https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-05/2024_0418_ohss_estimates-of-the-unauthorized-immigrant-population-residing-in-the-united-states-january-2018?january-2022.pdf>
(And naturally, that PDF disappeared from the DHS website when Trump's
junta came to power).
Bullshit.
Secondly, Biden managed to deport more illegal immigrants during his
term and Trump did during his first term.
Proof?
Methinks your fellow Canadians would NOT go for that.
Rounding up all illegal immigrants and providing them with trials
could cost governments nearly $1 trillion, with estimates suggesting
at least $88 billion per year for processing and removal of one
million undocumented immigrants. Additionally, the current
immigration court system would require significant expansion to
handle the backlog of cases, further increasing costs.
Let's do a little arithmetic for you:
$88 billion / 1 million = $88,000 per person.
Now divide $1 trillion by $88,000 and you get:
11,363,636
So you were bright enough to notice that your copied and pasted source
here contradicts that "20 million" figure you claimed above.
Fuck you Canadian, unless YOU, rich boy, wanna help us pay for that.
Until you change it, it is the law of the land.
Show us the law where illegal invaders get due process.
5th amendment: "no PERSON"
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
On 2025-04-15 13:57, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vtma07$57th$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-14 17:35, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:40:02 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-14 16:13, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 15:29:15 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-14 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To
Have Due Process And Stay In America?
Because every "person" is guaranteed it by the US
constitution.
Bu bu but it'ssss a living Constitution, open for amending and
interpretation, sayeth the liberals.
It's an old out-of-date document. We can change it.
There.
What if 20 million Mexicans crossed YOUR borders, would you grant
each and every one of them "due process", knowing it would cost
Canadians ONE TRILLION DOLLARS?
Let's deal with a crap ton of your bullshit.
First of all, there aren't "20 million Mexicans" illegal immigrants in
the US. There aren't even 20 million illegal immigrants in total.
In 2022, the DHS estimated that there were about 11 million.
"In summary, the Office of Homeland Security Statistics (OHSS) estimates >> 11.0 million unauthorized immigrants were living in the United States on >> January 1, 2022"
<https://web.archive.org/web/20240515161826/https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-05/2024_0418_ohss_estimates-of-the-unauthorized-immigrant-population-residing-in-the-united-states-january-2018?january-2022.pdf>
(And naturally, that PDF disappeared from the DHS website when Trump's
junta came to power).
Bullshit.
Nope. Fact.
Secondly, Biden managed to deport more illegal immigrants during his
term and Trump did during his first term.
Proof?
<https://infographicsite.com/infographic/deportations-under-us-presidents-statistics/>
Methinks your fellow Canadians would NOT go for that.
Rounding up all illegal immigrants and providing them with trials
could cost governments nearly $1 trillion, with estimates suggesting
at least $88 billion per year for processing and removal of one
million undocumented immigrants. Additionally, the current
immigration court system would require significant expansion to
handle the backlog of cases, further increasing costs.
Let's do a little arithmetic for you:
$88 billion / 1 million = $88,000 per person.
Now divide $1 trillion by $88,000 and you get:
11,363,636
So you were bright enough to notice that your copied and pasted source
here contradicts that "20 million" figure you claimed above.
Fuck you Canadian, unless YOU, rich boy, wanna help us pay for that.
Until you change it, it is the law of the land.
Show us the law where illegal invaders get due process.
5th amendment: "no PERSON"
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
In article <vtmhjq$h696$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-15 13:57, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vtma07$57th$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-14 17:35, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:40:02 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-14 16:13, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 15:29:15 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-14 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To
Have Due Process And Stay In America?
Because every "person" is guaranteed it by the US
constitution.
Bu bu but it'ssss a living Constitution, open for amending and
interpretation, sayeth the liberals.
It's an old out-of-date document. We can change it.
There.
What if 20 million Mexicans crossed YOUR borders, would you grant
each and every one of them "due process", knowing it would cost
Canadians ONE TRILLION DOLLARS?
Let's deal with a crap ton of your bullshit.
First of all, there aren't "20 million Mexicans" illegal immigrants in >>>> the US. There aren't even 20 million illegal immigrants in total.
In 2022, the DHS estimated that there were about 11 million.
"In summary, the Office of Homeland Security Statistics (OHSS) estimates >>>> 11.0 million unauthorized immigrants were living in the United States on >>>> January 1, 2022"
<https://web.archive.org/web/20240515161826/https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-05/2024_0418_ohss_estimates-of-the-unauthorized-immigrant-population-residing-in-the-united-states-january-2018?january-2022.pdf>
(And naturally, that PDF disappeared from the DHS website when Trump's >>>> junta came to power).
Bullshit.
Nope. Fact.
How do you know?
Secondly, Biden managed to deport more illegal immigrants during his
term and Trump did during his first term.
Proof?
<https://infographicsite.com/infographic/deportations-under-us-presidents-statistics/>
How about something credible?
Unless it's proven in court, every PERSON is innocent.
Methinks your fellow Canadians would NOT go for that.
Rounding up all illegal immigrants and providing them with trials
could cost governments nearly $1 trillion, with estimates suggesting >>>>> at least $88 billion per year for processing and removal of one
million undocumented immigrants. Additionally, the current
immigration court system would require significant expansion to
handle the backlog of cases, further increasing costs.
Let's do a little arithmetic for you:
$88 billion / 1 million = $88,000 per person.
Now divide $1 trillion by $88,000 and you get:
11,363,636
So you were bright enough to notice that your copied and pasted source >>>> here contradicts that "20 million" figure you claimed above.
Fuck you Canadian, unless YOU, rich boy, wanna help us pay for that. >>>>>
Until you change it, it is the law of the land.
Show us the law where illegal invaders get due process.
5th amendment: "no PERSON"
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
Crossing the wrong way is guilt enough.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To Have Due Process And Stay In America?
This man dressed as a woman really loves illegal gang members.
Rep. Sarah McBride doesn't want illegals deported without legal 'due process'
Who's gonna tell him?
We ARE at war!
On 2025-04-14, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:She's dead because a PERSON killed her.
Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To Have Due Process And Stay In America?
This man dressed as a woman really loves illegal gang members.
Rep. Sarah McBride doesn't want illegals deported without legal 'due process'
Who's gonna tell him?
We ARE at war!
Good question.
Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
On 2025-04-15 18:55, pothead wrote:
On 2025-04-14, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:She's dead because a PERSON killed her.
Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To Have Due Process And Stay In America?
This man dressed as a woman really loves illegal gang members.
Rep. Sarah McBride doesn't want illegals deported without legal 'due process'
Who's gonna tell him?
We ARE at war!
Good question.
Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
On 2025-04-15 18:55, pothead wrote:
On 2025-04-14, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To Have Due Process And Stay In America?
This man dressed as a woman really loves illegal gang members.
Rep. Sarah McBride doesn't want illegals deported without legal 'due process'
Who's gonna tell him?
We ARE at war!
Good question.She's dead because a PERSON killed her.
Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
In article <vtp1tk$2ua90$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-15 18:55, pothead wrote:
On 2025-04-14, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:She's dead because a PERSON killed her.
Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To Have Due Process And Stay In America?
This man dressed as a woman really loves illegal gang members.
Rep. Sarah McBride doesn't want illegals deported without legal 'due process'
Who's gonna tell him?
We ARE at war!
Good question.
Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
and that person was an illegal immigrant.
Bingo.Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because a PERSON killed her.She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
and that person was an illegal immigrant.
And totally preventable.
That's the point the libbys ignore.
On 16/4/25 18:41, pothead wrote:
Bingo.Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because a PERSON killed her.She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
and that person was an illegal immigrant.
And totally preventable.
That's the point the libbys ignore.
So no illegal immigrants then no murders.
The concept of an 'illegal immigrant' is only from the 1920s.
No murders during the nineteenth century. Nobody was shot in the
back of their head whilst watching a play.
In article <vtqbjq$6bga$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 16/4/25 18:41, pothead wrote:
Bingo.Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because a PERSON killed her.She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
and that person was an illegal immigrant.
And totally preventable.
That's the point the libbys ignore.
So no illegal immigrants then no murders.
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
The concept of an 'illegal immigrant' is only from the 1920s.
Cross the right way.
In article <vtqbjq$6bga$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 16/4/25 18:41, pothead wrote:
Bingo.Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because a PERSON killed her.She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
and that person was an illegal immigrant.
And totally preventable.
That's the point the libbys ignore.
So no illegal immigrants then no murders.
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
The concept of an 'illegal immigrant' is only from the 1920s.
Cross the right way.
No murders during the nineteenth century. Nobody was shot in the
back of their head whilst watching a play.
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <vtqbjq$6bga$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 16/4/25 18:41, pothead wrote:
Bingo.Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because a PERSON killed her.She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
and that person was an illegal immigrant.
And totally preventable.
That's the point the libbys ignore.
So no illegal immigrants then no murders.
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
Yet it is historically correct.
The concept of an 'illegal immigrant' is only from the 1920s.
Cross the right way.
So the ?right? way would be to have a totally fair & impartial system which doesn?t contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions ? right?
No murders during the nineteenth century. Nobody was shot in the
back of their head whilst watching a play.
Gosh, no snappy retort attempt on this satirical comment, eh?
-hh
In article <1601913815.766801634.333602.recscuba_google- huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <vtqbjq$6bga$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 16/4/25 18:41, pothead wrote:
Bingo.Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because a PERSON killed her.She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
and that person was an illegal immigrant.
And totally preventable.
That's the point the libbys ignore.
So no illegal immigrants then no murders.
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
Yet it is historically correct.
No it isn't. Are all liberals as dumb as you?
The concept of an 'illegal immigrant' is only from the 1920s.
Cross the right way.
So the ?right? way would be to have a totally fair & impartial system which >> doesn?t contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions ? right?
The right way. What part of that don't you understand?
No murders during the nineteenth century. Nobody was shot in the
back of their head whilst watching a play.
Gosh, no snappy retort attempt on this satirical comment, eh?
Because it was a stupid statement.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...But they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you...
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right?
Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <1601913815.766801634.333602.recscuba_google- huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <vtqbjq$6bga$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 16/4/25 18:41, pothead wrote:
Bingo.Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because a PERSON killed her.She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
and that person was an illegal immigrant.
And totally preventable.
That's the point the libbys ignore.
So no illegal immigrants then no murders.
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
Yet it is historically correct.
No it isn't. Are all liberals as dumb as you?
It is precisely what you?re trying to imply?and are now trying to play dumb when you?ve been called out for it.
The concept of an 'illegal immigrant' is only from the 1920s.
Cross the right way.
So the ?right? way would be to have a totally fair & impartial system which
doesn?t contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions ? right?
The right way. What part of that don't you understand?
Dodge attempted.
Again: does the ?right? way would be to have a totally fair & impartial system which does not contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions?
Because what we have today is not ?right? by these metrics. And by you trying to dodge acknowledgment of this, you?re effectively admitting that
our current immigration policy is not right.
No murders during the nineteenth century. Nobody was shot in the
back of their head whilst watching a play.
Gosh, no snappy retort attempt on this satirical comment, eh?
Because it was a stupid statement.
Not stupid at all: you?re merely mad that your attempt to imply/create causality from nothing has been called out as logically invalid.
-hh
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you...
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right?
Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.But they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a
birth certificate and social security card.
Good thing he got due process and got to appear before a judge, huh?
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <1601913815.766801634.333602.recscuba_google-
huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <vtqbjq$6bga$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 16/4/25 18:41, pothead wrote:
Bingo.Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because a PERSON killed her.She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
and that person was an illegal immigrant.
And totally preventable.
That's the point the libbys ignore.
So no illegal immigrants then no murders.
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
Yet it is historically correct.
No it isn't. Are all liberals as dumb as you?
It is precisely what you’re trying to imply…and are now trying to play dumb
when you’ve been called out for it.
The concept of an 'illegal immigrant' is only from the 1920s.
Cross the right way.
So the ?right? way would be to have a totally fair & impartial system which >>> doesn?t contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions ? right?
The right way. What part of that don't you understand?
Dodge attempted.
Again: does the “right” way would be to have a totally fair & impartial system which does not contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions?
In article <1033618142.767038163.174453.recscuba_google- huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <1601913815.766801634.333602.recscuba_google-
huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <vtqbjq$6bga$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 16/4/25 18:41, pothead wrote:
Bingo.Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because a PERSON killed her.She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
and that person was an illegal immigrant.
And totally preventable.
That's the point the libbys ignore.
So no illegal immigrants then no murders.
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
Yet it is historically correct.
No it isn't. Are all liberals as dumb as you?
It is precisely what you?re trying to imply?and are now trying to play dumb >> when you?ve been called out for it.
I never said that. But there would be a lot less.
The concept of an 'illegal immigrant' is only from the 1920s.
Cross the right way.
So the ?right? way would be to have a totally fair & impartial system which
doesn?t contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions ? right?
The right way. What part of that don't you understand?
Dodge attempted.
No dodge. Enter the right way. Why is following the law so
confusing to you libs?
Again: does the ?right? way would be to have a totally fair & impartial
system which does not contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions?
You submit your case and if you pass you may enter.
Because what we have today is not ?right? by these metrics. And by you
trying to dodge acknowledgment of this, you?re effectively admitting that
our current immigration policy is not right.
When was the last time you tried to cross the border? Stop
being dumb. Come to a legal entry point and it will be
determined if you are elegable. Got a crime record. Maybe
not.
No murders during the nineteenth century. Nobody was shot in the
back of their head whilst watching a play.
Gosh, no snappy retort attempt on this satirical comment, eh?
Because it was a stupid statement.
Not stupid at all: you’re merely mad that your attempt to imply/create
causality from nothing has been called out as logically invalid.
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <1033618142.767038163.174453.recscuba_google- huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <1601913815.766801634.333602.recscuba_google-
huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
In article <vtqbjq$6bga$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 16/4/25 18:41, pothead wrote:
Bingo.Did Laken Riley get due process?
She's dead because a PERSON killed her.She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
And there are many others like her.
and that person was an illegal immigrant.
And totally preventable.
That's the point the libbys ignore.
So no illegal immigrants then no murders.
Who said that? Oh YOU did.
Yet it is historically correct.
No it isn't. Are all liberals as dumb as you?
It is precisely what you?re trying to imply?and are now trying to play dumb
when you?ve been called out for it.
I never said that. But there would be a lot less.
Thus, why I said ?imply?.
And good luck trying to prove your ?a lot less? claim, because on a per capita basis, it?s known that immigrants commit fewer murders than native born Americans.
The concept of an 'illegal immigrant' is only from the 1920s.
Cross the right way.
So the ?right? way would be to have a totally fair & impartial system which
doesn?t contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions ? right?
The right way. What part of that don't you understand?
Dodge attempted.
No dodge. Enter the right way. Why is following the law so
confusing to you libs?
Because you?re still trying to dodge responsibility for the laws on if they are honest and just.
Case in point:
Again: does the ?right? way would be to have a totally fair & impartial >> system which does not contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions?
You submit your case and if you pass you may enter.
And if they?re not white Christian Europeans?
Current law says 25-70 year waitlists for some countries.
How can it be just to be so blatantly discriminatory?
Because what we have today is not ?right? by these metrics. And by you
trying to dodge acknowledgment of this, you?re effectively admitting that >> our current immigration policy is not right.
When was the last time you tried to cross the border? Stop
being dumb. Come to a legal entry point and it will be
determined if you are elegable. Got a crime record. Maybe
not.
Last time I crossed the border was earlier this month. How about you,
Walt?
Because we all know that the ?eligibility? bar varies very widely by where you?re from, with very clear undertones on favored race, religion, etc: it is *not* based on not having a criminal record, or other impartial ?eligibility? metrics: it is explicitly intended to keep some out based on things that they have no choice over (country of birth/origin, demographics of same, etc).
That?s why you dodge when asked if the ?right? way would be to have a
totally fair & impartialsystem which does not contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions: you know that the US system presently does not: it fails to be fair, just and right.
No murders during the nineteenth century. Nobody was shot in the >>>>>> back of their head whilst watching a play.
Gosh, no snappy retort attempt on this satirical comment, eh?
Because it was a stupid statement.
Not stupid at all: you?re merely mad that your attempt to imply/create
causality from nothing has been called out as logically invalid.
Which is why you still are trying to dodge, because you know is an unjust & unfair system that is not right, which is morally indefensible.
Do you refuse to criticize our shortcomings because you?re a coward? Or is it because you?re cravenly petty & selfish?
-hh
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.comBut without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El Salvador...
says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you...
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right?
Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
So? It's a big country.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a
birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
On 4/22/2025 1:45 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
another content-free batch of lies:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and
PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on
you...
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL
have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right?
Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or
seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
So? It's a big country.
Who cares?
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
LOL
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you... >>>
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right?
Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
So? It's a big country.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a
birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.But without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El Salvador...
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.comBut without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El Salvador... >>
says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
LOL
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you... >>>>>
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right?
Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
So? It's a big country.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a >>>> birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.comBut without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El Salvador... >>
says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
LOL
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you... >>>>>
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right?
Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
So? It's a big country.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a >>>> birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to actually prove it.
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
In article <vubnfp$1hlo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.comBut without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El Salvador... >>>>
says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
LOL
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you... >>>>>>>
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right? >>>>>>>Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
So? It's a big country.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a >>>>>> birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
Wont happen.
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to actually prove it.
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
You're scraping bottom now.Nope.
On 2025-04-23 15:10, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnfp$1hlo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.comBut without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El Salvador...
says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you...
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right? >>>>>>>Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
So? It's a big country.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a >>>>>> birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
Wont happen.
You hope.
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to actually prove it. >>
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
You're scraping bottom now.Nope.
The junta is already floating the idea that merely criticizing the junta
is "aiding and abetting terrorism".
In article <vubp9a$2cpu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:10, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnfp$1hlo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.comBut without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El Salvador...
says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you...
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right? >>>>>>>>>Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
So? It's a big country.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a >>>>>>>> birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
Wont happen.
You hope.
No worries.
'The White House’s Senior Director for Counterterrorism, Sebastian
Nope.
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to actually prove it. >>>>
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
You're scraping bottom now.
The junta is already floating the idea that merely criticizing the junta
is "aiding and abetting terrorism".
Huh?
On 2025-04-23 16:32, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp9a$2cpu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:10, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnfp$1hlo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.comBut without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El Salvador...
says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you...
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right? >>>>>>>>>Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
So? It's a big country.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a
birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
Wont happen.
You hope.
No worries.
They never do...
Nope.
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to actually prove it.
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
You're scraping bottom now.
The junta is already floating the idea that merely criticizing the junta >> is "aiding and abetting terrorism".
Huh?'The White House?s Senior Director for Counterterrorism, Sebastian
Gorka, attacked people seeking the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia?the Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador last month?and suggested
that opposition of the Trump administration?s deportation efforts may be
a federal crime, becoming the latest Trump official to go after critics
of the administration?s crackdown on immigrants.'
In article <vuc5mc$cuvp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 16:32, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp9a$2cpu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:10, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnfp$1hlo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.comBut without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El Salvador...
says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you...
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right? >>>>>>>>>>>Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
So? It's a big country.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a
birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
Wont happen.
You hope.
No worries.
They never do...
'The White House?s Senior Director for Counterterrorism, Sebastian
Nope.
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to actually prove it.
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
You're scraping bottom now.
The junta is already floating the idea that merely criticizing the junta >>>> is "aiding and abetting terrorism".
Huh?
Gorka, attacked people seeking the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia?the
Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador last month?and suggested
that opposition of the Trump administration?s deportation efforts may be
a federal crime, becoming the latest Trump official to go after critics
of the administration?s crackdown on immigrants.'
Oh that nonsense. He came from there and he's been
returned there.
On 2025-04-24 07:23, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuc5mc$cuvp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 16:32, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp9a$2cpu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:10, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnfp$1hlo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>> says...But without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El Salvador...
So? It's a big country.
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country. >>>>>>>>>
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you...
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right? >>>>>>>>>>>Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a
birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
Wont happen.
You hope.
No worries.
They never do...
'The White House?s Senior Director for Counterterrorism, Sebastian
Nope.
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to actually prove it.
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
You're scraping bottom now.
The junta is already floating the idea that merely criticizing the junta >>>> is "aiding and abetting terrorism".
Huh?
Gorka, attacked people seeking the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia?the
Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador last month?and suggested >> that opposition of the Trump administration?s deportation efforts may be >> a federal crime, becoming the latest Trump official to go after critics
of the administration?s crackdown on immigrants.'
Oh that nonsense. He came from there and he's been
returned there.
You missed the point.
Trump's junta is now claiming that to criticize this action is "abetting domestic terrorism".
In article <vuds80$1vtst$18@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
On 2025-04-24 07:23, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuc5mc$cuvp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 16:32, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp9a$2cpu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:10, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnfp$1hlo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>> says...But without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El Salvador...
So? It's a big country.
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country. >>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you...
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a
birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
Wont happen.
You hope.
No worries.
They never do...
'The White House?s Senior Director for Counterterrorism, Sebastian
Nope.
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to actually prove it.
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
You're scraping bottom now.
The junta is already floating the idea that merely criticizing the junta >>>>>> is "aiding and abetting terrorism".
Huh?
Gorka, attacked people seeking the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia?the
Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador last month?and suggested >>>> that opposition of the Trump administration?s deportation efforts may be >>>> a federal crime, becoming the latest Trump official to go after critics >>>> of the administration?s crackdown on immigrants.'
Oh that nonsense. He came from there and he's been
returned there.
You missed the point.
Trump's junta is now claiming that to criticize this action is "abetting
domestic terrorism".
So? They are trying to make that black kid that stabbed
the white kid a hero. Just shows how they think.
On 2025-04-24 10:39, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuds80$1vtst$18@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
On 2025-04-24 07:23, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuc5mc$cuvp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 16:32, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp9a$2cpu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:10, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnfp$1hlo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>> says...But without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El Salvador...
So? It's a big country.
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
But they're arresting people in the middle of the country. >>>>>>>>>>>
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate on you...
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid... they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right?
Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.
If not... no.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he showed a
birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
Wont happen.
You hope.
No worries.
They never do...
'The White House?s Senior Director for Counterterrorism, Sebastian
Nope.
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to actually prove it.
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
You're scraping bottom now.
The junta is already floating the idea that merely criticizing the junta
is "aiding and abetting terrorism".
Huh?
Gorka, attacked people seeking the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia?the >>>> Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador last month?and suggested >>>> that opposition of the Trump administration?s deportation efforts may be >>>> a federal crime, becoming the latest Trump official to go after critics >>>> of the administration?s crackdown on immigrants.'
Oh that nonsense. He came from there and he's been
returned there.
You missed the point.
Trump's junta is now claiming that to criticize this action is "abetting >> domestic terrorism".
So? They are trying to make that black kid that stabbed
the white kid a hero. Just shows how they think.
Do you no what "non sequitur" means?
How about "germane", has in "not germane"?
On 2025-04-24 07:23, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuc5mc$cuvp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.compaperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
says...
On 2025-04-23 16:32, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp9a$2cpu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:10, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnfp$1hlo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have
on you...
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth certificate
they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least >>>>>>>>>>>> temporarily.
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid...
defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing. >>>>>>>>>>>>
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're
But without due process, he could go straight to a gulag in El >Salvador...So? It's a big country.If not... no.But they're arresting people in the middle of the country. >>>>>>>>>>
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when he >showed a
birth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
Wont happen.
You hope.
No worries.
They never do...
'The White House?s Senior Director for Counterterrorism, Sebastian
Nope.
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to actually prove it.
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
You're scraping bottom now.
The junta is already floating the idea that merely criticizing the junta >>>>> is "aiding and abetting terrorism".
Huh?
Gorka, attacked people seeking the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia?the
Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador last month?and suggested >>> that opposition of the Trump administration?s deportation efforts may be >>> a federal crime, becoming the latest Trump official to go after critics
of the administration?s crackdown on immigrants.'
Oh that nonsense. He came from there and he's been
returned there.
You missed the point.
Trump's junta is now claiming that to criticize this action is "abetting >domestic terrorism".
In article <vuds80$1vtst$18@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
On 2025-04-24 07:23, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuc5mc$cuvp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 16:32, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp9a$2cpu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:10, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnfp$1hlo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have
certificate on you...
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth
they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid...
defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right? >> >>>>>>>>>>>Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're
he showed aBut they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
If not... no.
So? It's a big country.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when
El Salvador...But without due process, he could go straight to a gulag inbirth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
Wont happen.
You hope.
No worries.
They never do...
'The White House?s Senior Director for Counterterrorism, Sebastian
Nope.
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to actually >prove it.
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
You're scraping bottom now.
The junta is already floating the idea that merely criticizing the junta
is "aiding and abetting terrorism".
Huh?
Gorka, attacked people seeking the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia?the
Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador last month?and suggested >> >> that opposition of the Trump administration?s deportation efforts may be >> >> a federal crime, becoming the latest Trump official to go after critics >> >> of the administration?s crackdown on immigrants.'
Oh that nonsense. He came from there and he's been
returned there.
You missed the point.
Trump's junta is now claiming that to criticize this action is "abetting
domestic terrorism".
So? They are trying to make that black kid that stabbed
the white kid a hero. Just shows how they think.
On 2025-04-24 10:39, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuds80$1vtst$18@dont-email.me>, nuh-paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
uh@nope.com says...
On 2025-04-24 07:23, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuc5mc$cuvp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 16:32, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp9a$2cpu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:10, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnfp$1hlo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have
certificate on you...
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth
they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least >>>>>>>>>>>>>> temporarily.
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid...
defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're
he showed aSo? It's a big country.If not... no.But they're arresting people in the middle of the country. >>>>>>>>>>>>
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him when
El Salvador...But without due process, he could go straight to a gulag inbirth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
Wont happen.
You hope.
No worries.
They never do...
'The White House?s Senior Director for Counterterrorism, Sebastian
Nope.
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to actually >prove it.
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
You're scraping bottom now.
The junta is already floating the idea that merely criticizing the junta
is "aiding and abetting terrorism".
Huh?
Gorka, attacked people seeking the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia?the >>>>> Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador last month?and suggested >>>>> that opposition of the Trump administration?s deportation efforts may be >>>>> a federal crime, becoming the latest Trump official to go after critics >>>>> of the administration?s crackdown on immigrants.'
Oh that nonsense. He came from there and he's been
returned there.
You missed the point.
Trump's junta is now claiming that to criticize this action is "abetting >>> domestic terrorism".
So? They are trying to make that black kid that stabbed
the white kid a hero. Just shows how they think.
Do you no what "non sequitur" means?
How about "germane", has in "not germane"?
In article <vudu4b$240aq$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
certificate on you...
On 2025-04-24 10:39, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuds80$1vtst$18@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
On 2025-04-24 07:23, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuc5mc$cuvp$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 16:32, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp9a$2cpu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:10, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnfp$1hlo$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:47, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubbcr$3kpek$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8s68$196cb$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-16 15:10, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:04:05 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-04-15 15:14, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:03:53 -0700, Alan says...
They broke the law when they crossed. Guilty.
"innocent until PROVEN guilty".
If they had come in legally, stupid... they'd have >paperwork and PROOF of their innocence.
That's just it, Pussey:
If you get picked up, and don't have your birth
they WILL have paperwork to prove they're here legally... at least
LOL
BIRTH CERTIFICATE?!!
...YOU can't prove your citizenship.
If the people coming in go to a port of entry, stupid...
defecting or seeking "asylum", then they are entitled to a hearing.temporarily.
They climb a fence or swim a river? Bye!
So you can be summarily shipped off with no hearing too, right?
Yes.
If they come to a port of entry and declare they're
when he showed aBut they're arresting people in the middle of the country.
If not... no.
So? It's a big country.
They arrested a citizen and wouldn't even release him
El Salvador...But without due process, he could go straight to a gulag inbirth certificate and social security card.
I'm sure they had reason.
actually prove it.
...which means anyone...
...including you...
...could end up there.
Nope. I am not a gang member and I live here legally.
Until someone decides you aren't...
Wont happen.
You hope.
No worries.
They never do...
...and you're never given a hearing where they have to
the juntaNope.
You just don't think it can happen to you...
...because your skin is the "right" colour.
You're scraping bottom now.
The junta is already floating the idea that merely criticizing
'The White House?s Senior Director for Counterterrorism, Sebastianis "aiding and abetting terrorism".
Huh?
Gorka, attacked people seeking the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia?the >> >>>> Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador last month?and suggested
that opposition of the Trump administration?s deportation efforts may be
a federal crime, becoming the latest Trump official to go after critics >> >>>> of the administration?s crackdown on immigrants.'
Oh that nonsense. He came from there and he's been
returned there.
You missed the point.
Trump's junta is now claiming that to criticize this action is "abetting >> >> domestic terrorism".
So? They are trying to make that black kid that stabbed
the white kid a hero. Just shows how they think.
Do you no what "non sequitur" means?
How about "germane", has in "not germane"?
It means you can't back up the stupidity of the left.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:46:08 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
(The Doctor) wrote:
What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
I found almost thirty posts from you in this American political group
today. Obviously you don't give a s*t about Canadian Politics or
American ones. Which is it, troll?
--
Eighty years of empire building and Trump is flushing it
all down the can.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 498 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 50:44:31 |
| Calls: | 9,809 |
| Calls today: | 11 |
| Files: | 13,754 |
| Messages: | 6,190,345 |