• Trump admin scores legal wins after appeals court halts deportation fli

    From Colin O. Scopi@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 19 07:59:37 2025
    XPost: law.court.federal, or.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics

    The Trump administration on Friday scored two major legal wins in regard
    to its deportation flights for illegal migrants, after a federal appeals
    court temporarily paused U.S. District Judge James Boasberg’s contempt proceedings against the administration, and earlier in the day Boasberg declined to get involved in a different deportation case.

    Boasberg ruled Wednesday that “probable cause exists” to hold Trump administration officials in criminal contempt after they allegedly
    violated his orders by continuing the deportation flights under the
    Alien Enemies Act.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has now halted those
    proceedings in a 2-1 split in order to provide “sufficient opportunity”
    for the court to weigh the administration's appeal, according to The
    Hill.

    The two judges who approved the halt were Trump appointees, while the
    lone dissenter was appointed by former President Barack Obama.

    “In the absence of an appealable order or any clear and indisputable
    right to relief that would support mandamus, there is no ground for an administrative stay,” Judge Cornelia Pillard wrote in her dissent.

    The order comes after Boasberg declined to get involved in another
    deportation case, after attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union
    (ACLU) asked the judge to block any upcoming deportation flights over
    the weekend.

    Boasberg told the ACLU that he was "sympathetic" to their case, but
    could not get involved because of a Supreme Court ruling earlier this
    month.

    "It is very concerning, but at this point I just don't think I have the
    ability to grant relief to the plaintiffs," the judge said. "I just
    don't really see how you're asking me to do anything different from what
    the Supreme Court said I couldn't do."

    https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/federal-appeals-court-temporarily-halts-boasbergs-contempt-proceedings-over

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tommy@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 20 18:04:54 2025
    XPost: law.court.federal, or.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics

    On 19 Apr 2025, Colin O. Scopi <posted@news.con> posted some news:cf30df1dfd.1745049570@eumqy.bw:

    The Trump administration on Friday scored two major legal wins in
    regard to its deportation flights for illegal migrants, after a
    federal appeals court temporarily paused U.S. District Judge James Boasberg’s contempt proceedings against the administration, and
    earlier in the day Boasberg declined to get involved in a different deportation case.

    Boasberg ruled Wednesday that “probable cause exists” to hold
    Trump administration officials in criminal contempt after they
    allegedly violated his orders by continuing the deportation flights
    under the Alien Enemies Act.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has now halted those proceedings in a 2-1 split in order to provide “sufficient
    opportunity” for the court to weigh the administration's appeal,
    according to The Hill.

    The two judges who approved the halt were Trump appointees, while the
    lone dissenter was appointed by former President Barack Obama.

    “In the absence of an appealable order or any clear and indisputable
    right to relief that would support mandamus, there is no ground for an administrative stay,” Judge Cornelia Pillard wrote in her dissent.

    The order comes after Boasberg declined to get involved in another deportation case, after attorneys for the American Civil Liberties
    Union (ACLU) asked the judge to block any upcoming deportation flights
    over the weekend.

    Boasberg told the ACLU that he was "sympathetic" to their case, but
    could not get involved because of a Supreme Court ruling earlier this
    month.

    "It is very concerning, but at this point I just don't think I have
    the ability to grant relief to the plaintiffs," the judge said. "I
    just don't really see how you're asking me to do anything different
    from what the Supreme Court said I couldn't do."

    https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/federal-appeals-court-tem porarily-halts-boasbergs-contempt-proceedings-over

    That's what we like to hear, Obama judges getting tort-slapped.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)