On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 18:23:36 -0700, Rudy Canoza, forever the mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport letterman,So you're stating for the record that Hegseth didn't do it?
like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who was *NEVER* a
lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as me, says...
"according to four people with knowledge of the chat"
No need to read past that bullshit.
https://www.nytimes.com
On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 20:58:41 -0700, Alan says...Funny how when we ask you why all kinds of things aren't being
On 2025-04-20 20:46, AlleyCat wrote:
On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 18:23:36 -0700, Rudy Canoza, forever the
mental and physical midget, who was *NEVER* a three sport
letterman, like me, and who was *NEVER* a bouncer, like me, and
who was *NEVER* an assistant golf pro, like me, and who was
*NEVER* a lifeguard, like me, and who *NEVER* dunked a
basketball, like me, and has *NEVER* laid as many women as me,
says...
"according to four people with knowledge of the chat"
No need to read past that bullshit.
https://www.nytimes.com
So you're stating for the record that Hegseth didn't do it?
What "record"?
There is always more to these stories, than what these propaganda
sites "report".
They lie by omission.
Slate and Axios, which Lyin' Lee uses almost explicitly, ALWAYS
twist the truth into some evil conspiracy, that, 2 weeks later, is
always debunked or explained away with SIMPLE reasons.
There's no fucking way in hell, a MILITARY man, such as Hegseth, is
going to let his wife, brother and lawyer, have access to classified
or top secret "plans".
NOBODY is that stupid, 'cept maybe Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden.
I still maintain, that if ANY of this shit is "true", then there's a
logical explanation... misinformation being just one of many.
"according to four people with knowledge of the chat"
WHO are these four people? If they KNOW, then, why aren't Democrat
Senators and Representatives hauling their asses into Congress to
find out what they "know"?
Why isn't Hegseth under investigation by these same Congressmen?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:09:59 -0700, Alan says...What does that matter?
Do you think that Hegseth shared these plans with people who had
no security clearance?
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those without
security clearance?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:09:59 -0700, Alan says...Actually, now I DO know!
Do you think that Hegseth shared these plans with people who had
no security clearance?
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those without
security clearance?
On 2025-04-21 19:43, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:09:59 -0700, Alan says...
Do you think that Hegseth shared these plans with people who had
no security clearance?
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those withoutWhat does that matter?
security clearance?
I'm asking you.
The reports are that Hegseth got information on military operations on a secure device/channel, and reshared them with people who don't have
security clearanes.
Do you think those reports are false?
In article <vu8ki0$do42$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-21 19:43, AlleyCat wrote:
What does that matter?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:09:59 -0700, Alan says...
Do you think that Hegseth shared these plans with people who had
no security clearance?
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for
divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those without
security clearance?
I'm asking you.
The reports are that Hegseth got information on military operations on a
secure device/channel, and reshared them with people who don't have
security clearanes.
Do you think those reports are false?
What makes you think they are true?
On 2025-04-21 19:43, AlleyCat wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:09:59 -0700, Alan says...
Do you think that Hegseth shared these plans with people who had
no security clearance?
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those withoutActually, now I DO know!
security clearance?
It's not a congressional investigation...
...but then Trump loyalists are running congress right now:
'The Pentagon?s inspector general has launched an investigation into
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth?s use of the Signal messaging app to
discuss U.S. military operations in Yemen with other national security officials.'
<https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/03/dod-watchdog-investigation-hegseth-signal-00270210>
'The inquiry follows calls from Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and ranking member Jack Reed (D-R.I.) for the agency?s
watchdog to look into Hegseth?s messages and participation in the chat. National security adviser Mike Waltz set up the now infamous chat in
March to coordinate the Trump administration?s plans for strikes against
the Houthis and accidentally invited a journalist to it.'
Oh, and to be clear:
'The White House insists it has ended any further investigation into the episode, although POLITICO reported Wednesday that Waltz set up as many
as 20 group chats to coordinate the Trump administration?s foreign policy.'
On 2025-04-22 13:55, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8ki0$do42$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-21 19:43, AlleyCat wrote:
What does that matter?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:09:59 -0700, Alan says...
Do you think that Hegseth shared these plans with people who had
no security clearance?
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for
divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those without
security clearance?
I'm asking you.
The reports are that Hegseth got information on military operations on a >> secure device/channel, and reshared them with people who don't have
security clearanes.
Do you think those reports are false?
What makes you think they are true?
I was asking PusseyCat what he thinks...
...but I'm willing to have you answer my question.
:-)
In article <vu8vrl$1ctqu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:55, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8ki0$do42$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-21 19:43, AlleyCat wrote:
What does that matter?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:09:59 -0700, Alan says...
Do you think that Hegseth shared these plans with people who had
no security clearance?
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for >>>>> divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those without
security clearance?
I'm asking you.
The reports are that Hegseth got information on military operations on a >>>> secure device/channel, and reshared them with people who don't have
security clearanes.
Do you think those reports are false?
What makes you think they are true?
I was asking PusseyCat what he thinks...
...but I'm willing to have you answer my question.
:-)
I asked you a question. Answer it.
On 2025-04-22 14:29, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8vrl$1ctqu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:55, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8ki0$do42$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-21 19:43, AlleyCat wrote:
What does that matter?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:09:59 -0700, Alan says...
Do you think that Hegseth shared these plans with people who had >>>>>> no security clearance?
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for >>>>> divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those without
security clearance?
I'm asking you.
The reports are that Hegseth got information on military operations on a >>>> secure device/channel, and reshared them with people who don't have
security clearanes.
Do you think those reports are false?
What makes you think they are true?
I was asking PusseyCat what he thinks...
...but I'm willing to have you answer my question.
:-)
I asked you a question. Answer it.
I asked a question first.
Answer it and I'll consider answering yours.
In article <vu91ro$1f8fm$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 14:29, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8vrl$1ctqu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:55, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8ki0$do42$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-21 19:43, AlleyCat wrote:
What does that matter?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:09:59 -0700, Alan says...
Do you think that Hegseth shared these plans with people who had >>>>>>>> no security clearance?
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for >>>>>>> divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those without
security clearance?
I'm asking you.
The reports are that Hegseth got information on military operations on a >>>>>> secure device/channel, and reshared them with people who don't have >>>>>> security clearanes.
Do you think those reports are false?
What makes you think they are true?
I was asking PusseyCat what he thinks...
...but I'm willing to have you answer my question.
:-)
I asked you a question. Answer it.
I asked a question first.
Answer it and I'll consider answering yours.
You didn't ask me. Now answer the damn question.
On 2025-04-22 14:36, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu91ro$1f8fm$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 14:29, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8vrl$1ctqu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:55, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8ki0$do42$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-21 19:43, AlleyCat wrote:
What does that matter?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:09:59 -0700, Alan says...
Do you think that Hegseth shared these plans with people who had >>>>>>>> no security clearance?
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for >>>>>>> divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those without >>>>>>> security clearance?
I'm asking you.
The reports are that Hegseth got information on military operations on a
secure device/channel, and reshared them with people who don't have >>>>>> security clearanes.
Do you think those reports are false?
What makes you think they are true?
I was asking PusseyCat what he thinks...
...but I'm willing to have you answer my question.
:-)
I asked you a question. Answer it.
I asked a question first.
Answer it and I'll consider answering yours.
You didn't ask me. Now answer the damn question.
Nope.
You replied to my post where I had posed a question.
Answer it. Take a stand.
Or are you too much a coward.
In article <vu93sf$1gtg2$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 14:36, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu91ro$1f8fm$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 14:29, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8vrl$1ctqu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:55, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8ki0$do42$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-21 19:43, AlleyCat wrote:
What does that matter?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:09:59 -0700, Alan says...
Do you think that Hegseth shared these plans with people who had >>>>>>>>>> no security clearance?
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for >>>>>>>>> divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those without >>>>>>>>> security clearance?
I'm asking you.
The reports are that Hegseth got information on military operations on a
secure device/channel, and reshared them with people who don't have >>>>>>>> security clearanes.
Do you think those reports are false?
What makes you think they are true?
I was asking PusseyCat what he thinks...
...but I'm willing to have you answer my question.
:-)
I asked you a question. Answer it.
I asked a question first.
Answer it and I'll consider answering yours.
You didn't ask me. Now answer the damn question.
Nope.
You replied to my post where I had posed a question.
Answer it. Take a stand.
Or are you too much a coward.
Why are you running from my question?
On 2025-04-22 16:16, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu93sf$1gtg2$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 14:36, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu91ro$1f8fm$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 14:29, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8vrl$1ctqu$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 13:55, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vu8ki0$do42$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-21 19:43, AlleyCat wrote:
What does that matter?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:09:59 -0700, Alan says...
Do you think that Hegseth shared these plans with people who had >>>>>>>>>> no security clearance?
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for
divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those without >>>>>>>>> security clearance?
I'm asking you.
The reports are that Hegseth got information on military operations on a
secure device/channel, and reshared them with people who don't have >>>>>>>> security clearanes.
Do you think those reports are false?
What makes you think they are true?
I was asking PusseyCat what he thinks...
...but I'm willing to have you answer my question.
:-)
I asked you a question. Answer it.
I asked a question first.
Answer it and I'll consider answering yours.
You didn't ask me. Now answer the damn question.
Nope.
You replied to my post where I had posed a question.
Answer it. Take a stand.
Or are you too much a coward.
Why are you running from my question?
Why are you running from mine?
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay (a
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
On 2025-04-22 20:19, AlleyCat wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay (a
person testified to what another person told him yet a third person had said)...
...and you don't seem to mind that at all.
In article <vubcfg$3kpek$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 20:19, AlleyCat wrote:
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay (a
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
person testified to what another person told him yet a third person had
said)...
...and you don't seem to mind that at all.
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
On 2025-04-23 14:50, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubcfg$3kpek$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 20:19, AlleyCat wrote:
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay (a
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
person testified to what another person told him yet a third person had
said)...
...and you don't seem to mind that at all.
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
In article <vubnck$1hlo$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:50, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubcfg$3kpek$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 20:19, AlleyCat wrote:
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay (a
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
person testified to what another person told him yet a third person had >>>> said)...
...and you don't seem to mind that at all.
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
No, they went by facts.
On 2025-04-23 15:15, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnck$1hlo$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:50, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubcfg$3kpek$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 20:19, AlleyCat wrote:
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay (a
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
person testified to what another person told him yet a third person had >>>> said)...
...and you don't seem to mind that at all.
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
No, they went by facts.
Let's see you articulate those facts.
How about you start with a SINGLE fact that indicated Abrego Garcia was
a member of MS13?
In article <vubp5i$2cpu$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:15, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnck$1hlo$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:50, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubcfg$3kpek$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 20:19, AlleyCat wrote:
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay (a >>>>>> person testified to what another person told him yet a third person had >>>>>> said)...
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
...and you don't seem to mind that at all.
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
No, they went by facts.
Let's see you articulate those facts.
How about you start with a SINGLE fact that indicated Abrego Garcia was
a member of MS13?
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:48:24 -0700, Alan says...
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos".
You stupid fuck... they didn't "fake" the tattoos. They simply put what the tattoos meant.
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
Do you know if Pete Hegseth is under Congressional investigation for
divulging CLASSIFIED or TOP SECRET information to those without
security clearance?
What does that matter?
So... that would be a no.
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:53:36 -0700, Alan says...This is the Inspector General of the Department of Defense opening an investigation at the behest of congress.
It's not a congressional investigation...
Then it doesn't count.
ANYONE can open an "investigation, stupid.
On 2025-04-23 20:40, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:48:24 -0700, Alan says...
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos".
You stupid fuck... they didn't "fake" the tattoos. They simply put what the tattoos meant.
Nope. If they'd done that, they would have SAID that.
On 2025-04-23 16:36, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp5i$2cpu$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:15, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnck$1hlo$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:50, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubcfg$3kpek$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 20:19, AlleyCat wrote:
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay (a >>>>>> person testified to what another person told him yet a third person had
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
said)...
...and you don't seem to mind that at all.
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
No, they went by facts.
Let's see you articulate those facts.
How about you start with a SINGLE fact that indicated Abrego Garcia was
a member of MS13?
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos".
Here's a photo of Abrego Garcia with Salvadoran president, Bukele:
<https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GoxxScKXcAELfeE?format=jpg&name=large>
Notice the complete lack of the supposed "ink".
As for his "associations", standing outside a Home Depot hoping to pick
up day labour doesn't make you an "associate" of others trying to do the
same thing.
In article <vuccah$nned$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:40, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:48:24 -0700, Alan says...
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos".
You stupid fuck... they didn't "fake" the tattoos. They simply put what the tattoos meant.
Nope. If they'd done that, they would have SAID that.
They did say that.
In article <vuc598$cuvq$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 16:36, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp5i$2cpu$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:15, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnck$1hlo$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:50, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubcfg$3kpek$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 20:19, AlleyCat wrote:
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay (a >>>>>>>> person testified to what another person told him yet a third person had
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
said)...
...and you don't seem to mind that at all.
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
No, they went by facts.
Let's see you articulate those facts.
How about you start with a SINGLE fact that indicated Abrego Garcia was >>>> a member of MS13?
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos".
Here's a photo of Abrego Garcia with Salvadoran president, Bukele:
<https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GoxxScKXcAELfeE?format=jpg&name=large>
Notice the complete lack of the supposed "ink".
As for his "associations", standing outside a Home Depot hoping to pick
up day labour doesn't make you an "associate" of others trying to do the
same thing.
Get glasses. Yes they are there.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:51:16 -0700, Alan says...
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
So... you are saying that absolutely, Garcia is not MS-13.
Gotcha.
If he's not MS-13, then WHY did his punching bag(wife) cover them up
in this video?
Andy Ngo found Abrego Garcia's wife covered up with hearts on his
knuckles his tattoos of Marijuana "M" a Smiley "S" and the #s 1 and 3-MS-13-if they were OK why cover them up?
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, has
strategically censored her partner's left hand in the photo she
uploaded on her TikTok to promote her GoFundMe.
@nayibbukele, can you release the full resolution photos from the
photoshoot meeting he had with @ChrisVanHollen? The tattoos appear
to be a marijuana leaf, a smile and the number 13.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1913308669883854848/vid/ avc1/720x1280/Xfq8IrgY0gO-2w8W.mp4?tag=16
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:45:04 -0700, Alan says...Nope. The reports were presented TO judges.
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay
From two JUDGES, not anonymous sources.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:51:32 -0700, Alan says...You're the one reaching, PusseyBoi.
...and congress is controlled by Trump sycophants
So?
Congress has NEVER investigated a Democrat, when Congress was controlled by Democrats with a Democrat President.
Reach, brother-fucker... REACH!
On 2025-04-24 07:33, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuccah$nned$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:40, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:48:24 -0700, Alan says...
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos".
You stupid fuck... they didn't "fake" the tattoos. They simply put what the tattoos meant.
Nope. If they'd done that, they would have SAID that.
They did say that.
Then you'll have no trouble quoting it, will you?
And we all know that when you can provide support, you do, don't we?
:-)
On 2025-04-24 07:32, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuc598$cuvq$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 16:36, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp5i$2cpu$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:15, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnck$1hlo$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:50, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubcfg$3kpek$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 20:19, AlleyCat wrote:
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay (a >>>>>>>> person testified to what another person told him yet a third person had
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
said)...
...and you don't seem to mind that at all.
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
No, they went by facts.
Let's see you articulate those facts.
How about you start with a SINGLE fact that indicated Abrego Garcia was >>>> a member of MS13?
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos".
Here's a photo of Abrego Garcia with Salvadoran president, Bukele:
<https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GoxxScKXcAELfeE?format=jpg&name=large>
Notice the complete lack of the supposed "ink".
As for his "associations", standing outside a Home Depot hoping to pick
up day labour doesn't make you an "associate" of others trying to do the >> same thing.
Get glasses. Yes they are there.
Nope.
The letters "M S 1 3" are clearly Photoshopped onto the image.
And you know who agrees that he had no gang tattoos?
The Prince George Police Department.
:-)
On 2025-04-23 20:23, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:51:16 -0700, Alan says...
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
So... you are saying that absolutely, Garcia is not MS-13.
I'm saying that it is far from proven that he is part of MS13.
Gotcha.
If he's not MS-13, then WHY did his punching bag(wife) cover them up
in this video?
Andy Ngo found Abrego Garcia's wife covered up with hearts on his
knuckles his tattoos of Marijuana "M" a Smiley "S" and the #s 1 and 3-MS-13-if they were OK why cover them up?
Because that's where her heart is in the photo?
53ELGcIDs0JzukKqZVIski7xPRabzPnPrVFhYGl6pFqwwoNg34zXtB3U66eaEz_YPSNYTDVPxhjAQ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjevKqLlfGMAxW_weYEHUKZAe4QtKgLegQIExAB&biw=1618&bih=886&dpr=2>Kilmar Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, has
strategically censored her partner's left hand in the photo she
uploaded on her TikTok to promote her GoFundMe.
@nayibbukele, can you release the full resolution photos from the photoshoot meeting he had with @ChrisVanHollen? The tattoos appear
to be a marijuana leaf, a smile and the number 13.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1913308669883854848/vid/ avc1/720x1280/Xfq8IrgY0gO-2w8W.mp4?tag=16
Here are actual MS13 gang tattoos:
<https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&sca_esv=1243c2b95c154fbe&q=ms13+tattoos&udm=2&fbs=ABzOT_CWdhQLP1FcmU5B0fn3xuWpA-dk4wpBWOGsoR7DG5zJBq3yjtZsyDrI40y5Sp313Qo9yeEYj9D2EYI66a6sNSuja9foUUTSG3xx0IUuYsG2ky3os2hDz-zm1_9Yl0ioNZWMk-C76w1W2rSY_
Note how completely free from this alleged code you (and Trump) have invented.
On 2025-04-23 20:23, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:45:04 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay
From two JUDGES, not anonymous sources.Nope. The reports were presented TO judges.
Judges don't issue reports in cases like this: they make RULINGS.
Those rulings are based on testimony and evidence presented, and hearsay
is typically not allowed.
You really don't understand how the judicial process works, do you?
On 2025-04-24 10:18, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:48:33 -0700, Alan says...
You stupid fuck... they didn't "fake" the tattoos. They simply
put what the tattoos meant.
Nope. If they'd done that, they would have SAID that.
"They" did, you stupid fuck.
Nope.
A close look at the photo shows obvious signs that the letters are,
in fact, intentionally added LABELS applied to explain the symbols confirmed in other photos of Abrego Garcia's left hand.
Nope.
In article <vudr5u$1vtst$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-24 07:33, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuccah$nned$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:40, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:48:24 -0700, Alan says...
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1> >>>>>>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos".
You stupid fuck... they didn't "fake" the tattoos. They simply put what the tattoos meant.
Nope. If they'd done that, they would have SAID that.
They did say that.
Then you'll have no trouble quoting it, will you?
And we all know that when you can provide support, you do, don't we?
:-)
You have seen the tatoos. You have read the article. Stop
being stupid.
In article <vudsqf$1vu9u$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-24 10:18, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:48:33 -0700, Alan says...
You stupid fuck... they didn't "fake" the tattoos. They simply
put what the tattoos meant.
Nope. If they'd done that, they would have SAID that.
"They" did, you stupid fuck.
Nope.
A close look at the photo shows obvious signs that the letters are,
in fact, intentionally added LABELS applied to explain the symbols
confirmed in other photos of Abrego Garcia's left hand.
Nope.
and away he runs.
In article <vudr8r$1vtst$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-24 07:32, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuc598$cuvq$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 16:36, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp5i$2cpu$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:15, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnck$1hlo$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:50, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubcfg$3kpek$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-22 20:19, AlleyCat wrote:
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay (a >>>>>>>>>> person testified to what another person told him yet a third person had
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
said)...
...and you don't seem to mind that at all.
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
No, they went by facts.
Let's see you articulate those facts.
How about you start with a SINGLE fact that indicated Abrego Garcia was >>>>>> a member of MS13?
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos".
Here's a photo of Abrego Garcia with Salvadoran president, Bukele:
<https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GoxxScKXcAELfeE?format=jpg&name=large>
Notice the complete lack of the supposed "ink".
As for his "associations", standing outside a Home Depot hoping to pick >>>> up day labour doesn't make you an "associate" of others trying to do the >>>> same thing.
Get glasses. Yes they are there.
Nope.
The letters "M S 1 3" are clearly Photoshopped onto the image.
And you know who agrees that he had no gang tattoos?
The Prince George Police Department.
:-)
No photoshop. The tats on his fingers are a MS 13 tat.
This is well known among those who know.
In article <vudric$1vu9u$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:23, AlleyCat wrote:
Nope. The reports were presented TO judges.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:45:04 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay
From two JUDGES, not anonymous sources.
Judges don't issue reports in cases like this: they make RULINGS.
Those rulings are based on testimony and evidence presented, and hearsay
is typically not allowed.
ell it was allowed so I guess it wasn't "hearsay".
You really don't understand how the judicial process works, do you?
Like the judge that had gang members living with him?
In article <vudreu$1vu9u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:23, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:51:16 -0700, Alan says...
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
So... you are saying that absolutely, Garcia is not MS-13.
I'm saying that it is far from proven that he is part of MS13.
You don't wear the signs if you're not in.
Gotcha.
If he's not MS-13, then WHY did his punching bag(wife) cover them up
in this video?
Andy Ngo found Abrego Garcia's wife covered up with hearts on his
knuckles his tattoos of Marijuana "M" a Smiley "S" and the #s 1 and
3-MS-13-if they were OK why cover them up?
Because that's where her heart is in the photo?
Nice excuse. The tats are real.
53ELGcIDs0JzukKqZVIski7xPRabzPnPrVFhYGl6pFqwwoNg34zXtB3U66eaEz_YPSNYTDVPxhjAQ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjevKqLlfGMAxW_weYEHUKZAe4QtKgLegQIExAB&biw=1618&bih=886&dpr=2>
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, has
strategically censored her partner's left hand in the photo she
uploaded on her TikTok to promote her GoFundMe.
@nayibbukele, can you release the full resolution photos from the
photoshoot meeting he had with @ChrisVanHollen? The tattoos appear
to be a marijuana leaf, a smile and the number 13.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1913308669883854848/vid/
avc1/720x1280/Xfq8IrgY0gO-2w8W.mp4?tag=16
Here are actual MS13 gang tattoos:
<https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&sca_esv=1243c2b95c154fbe&q=ms13+tattoos&udm=2&fbs=ABzOT_CWdhQLP1FcmU5B0fn3xuWpA-dk4wpBWOGsoR7DG5zJBq3yjtZsyDrI40y5Sp313Qo9yeEYj9D2EYI66a6sNSuja9foUUTSG3xx0IUuYsG2ky3os2hDz-zm1_9Yl0ioNZWMk-C76w1W2rSY_
Note how completely free from this alleged code you (and Trump) have
invented.
Who says? Some garbage from biased Google that has no
affiliation with gangs?
On 2025-04-24 10:18, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:51:32 -0700, Alan says...
...and congress is controlled by Trump sycophants
So?
Congress has NEVER investigated a Democrat, when Congress was controlled by Democrats with a Democrat President.
Reach, brother-fucker... REACH!You're the one reaching, PusseyBoi.
Congress has called for an investigation by the IG of the DoD.
On 2025-04-24 10:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vudr5u$1vtst$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-24 07:33, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuccah$nned$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:40, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:48:24 -0700, Alan says...
You stupid fuck... they didn't "fake" the tattoos. They simply put what the tattoos meant.The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1> >>>>>>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos". >>>>>
Nope. If they'd done that, they would have SAID that.
They did say that.
Then you'll have no trouble quoting it, will you?
And we all know that when you can provide support, you do, don't we?
:-)
You have seen the tatoos. You have read the article. Stop
being stupid.
And I've read the report by the Prince George Police Department that
lists his supposed signs of being in a gang...
...and that it doesn't list tattoos as one of them.
On 2025-04-24 10:49, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vudreu$1vu9u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:23, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:51:16 -0700, Alan says...
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
So... you are saying that absolutely, Garcia is not MS-13.
I'm saying that it is far from proven that he is part of MS13.
You don't wear the signs if you're not in.
So why doesn't the Prince George Police Department believe those are
gang signs?
Gotcha.
If he's not MS-13, then WHY did his punching bag(wife) cover them up
in this video?
Andy Ngo found Abrego Garcia's wife covered up with hearts on his
knuckles his tattoos of Marijuana "M" a Smiley "S" and the #s 1 and
3-MS-13-if they were OK why cover them up?
Because that's where her heart is in the photo?
Nice excuse. The tats are real.
I never said they weren't.
What hasn't been shown is that they indicate MS13.
53ELGcIDs0JzukKqZVIski7xPRabzPnPrVFhYGl6pFqwwoNg34zXtB3U66eaEz_YPSNYTDVPxhjAQ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjevKqLlfGMAxW_weYEHUKZAe4QtKgLegQIExAB&biw=1618&bih=886&dpr=2>
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, has
strategically censored her partner's left hand in the photo she
uploaded on her TikTok to promote her GoFundMe.
@nayibbukele, can you release the full resolution photos from the
photoshoot meeting he had with @ChrisVanHollen? The tattoos appear
to be a marijuana leaf, a smile and the number 13.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1913308669883854848/vid/
avc1/720x1280/Xfq8IrgY0gO-2w8W.mp4?tag=16
Here are actual MS13 gang tattoos:
<https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&sca_esv=1243c2b95c154fbe&q=ms13+tattoos&udm=2&fbs=ABzOT_CWdhQLP1FcmU5B0fn3xuWpA-dk4wpBWOGsoR7DG5zJBq3yjtZsyDrI40y5Sp313Qo9yeEYj9D2EYI66a6sNSuja9foUUTSG3xx0IUuYsG2ky3os2hDz-zm1_9Yl0ioNZWMk-C76w1W2rSY_
Note how completely free from this alleged code you (and Trump) have
invented.
Who says? Some garbage from biased Google that has no
affiliation with gangs?
So show another individual with those signs.
On 2025-04-24 10:47, Skeeter OG wrote:EgNpbWciHXRhdHRvb3MgbXMxMyAtImFicmVnbyBnYXJjaWEiSM8GUMUDWMUDcAJ4AJABAJgBPqABPqoBATG4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgCgAgCYAwCIBgGSBwCgBy2yBwC4BwA&sclient=img>
In article <vudr8r$1vtst$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-24 07:32, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuc598$cuvq$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 16:36, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubp5i$2cpu$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:15, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubnck$1hlo$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:50, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vubcfg$3kpek$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-04-22 20:19, AlleyCat wrote:
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay (a >>>>>>>>>> person testified to what another person told him yet a third person had
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
said)...
...and you don't seem to mind that at all.
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
No, they went by facts.
Let's see you articulate those facts.
How about you start with a SINGLE fact that indicated Abrego Garcia was
a member of MS13?
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos".
Here's a photo of Abrego Garcia with Salvadoran president, Bukele:
<https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GoxxScKXcAELfeE?format=jpg&name=large>
Notice the complete lack of the supposed "ink".
As for his "associations", standing outside a Home Depot hoping to pick >>>> up day labour doesn't make you an "associate" of others trying to do the >>>> same thing.
Get glasses. Yes they are there.
Nope.
The letters "M S 1 3" are clearly Photoshopped onto the image.
And you know who agrees that he had no gang tattoos?
The Prince George Police Department.
:-)
No photoshop. The tats on his fingers are a MS 13 tat.
This is well known among those who know.
So show another individual with the same tattoos.
Here, I'll help:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=tattoos+ms13+-%22abrego+garcia%22&client=safari&sca_esv=de90481cfd079ac5&udm=2&biw=1621&bih=949&ei=etAJaKrYEOmC0PEPtsaJ4AE&ved=0ahUKEwiq_faK_O-MAxVpATQIHTZjAhwQ4dUDCBQ&uact=5&oq=tattoos+ms13+-%22abrego+garcia%22&gs_lp=
On 2025-04-24 10:50, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vudric$1vu9u$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:23, AlleyCat wrote:
Nope. The reports were presented TO judges.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:45:04 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay
From two JUDGES, not anonymous sources.
Judges don't issue reports in cases like this: they make RULINGS.
Those rulings are based on testimony and evidence presented, and hearsay >> is typically not allowed.
ell it was allowed so I guess it wasn't "hearsay".
Nope. That's not how reality works.
You really don't understand how the judicial process works, do you?
Like the judge that had gang members living with him?
1. Illegal immigrant, not gang member.
2. That that person listed that as his address, doesn't mean it was.
On 4/24/2025 9:47 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
another content-free batch of lies:
In article <iQtOP.98968$oJg.60915@fx17.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/24/2025 6:58 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <g3fOP.396000$5e_1.385843@fx33.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 4/23/2025 4:36 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <vubp5i$2cpu$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 15:15, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <vubnck$1hlo$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 14:50, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking >>>>>>>>> do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <vubcfg$3kpek$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com >>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2025-04-22 20:19, AlleyCat wrote:
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 10:44:32 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
hearsay (a person testified to what another person told him >>>>>>>>>>> yet a third person had said)...
...and you don't seem to mind that at all.
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
No, they went by facts.
Let's see you articulate those facts.
How about you start with a SINGLE fact that indicated Abrego
Garcia was a member of MS13?
The tats on his fingers and
Fuck off. You haven't seen them and you wouldn't recognize any
gang "tats" [sic] even if you did.
I have seen them and
No, you have not seen them.
Yes and
No, you have not seen Abrego Garcia's tattoos, and you wouldn't be
able to tell anything from them even if you had. Stop lying, you fat
*old* little bitch.
I grew up around gangs.
Bull-fucking-shit. You grew up in some lily-white downmarket suburb.
You have no idea
I know nothing, nothing!
On 2025-04-24 10:18, AlleyCat wrote:
controlled by Democrats with a Democrat President.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:51:32 -0700, Alan says...
...and congress is controlled by Trump sycophants
So?
Congress has NEVER investigated a Democrat, when Congress was
You're the one reaching, PusseyBoi.
Reach, brother-fucker... REACH!
Congress has called for an investigation by the IG of the DoD.
In article <vudr5u$1vtst$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
what the tattoos meant.
On 2025-04-24 07:33, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuccah$nned$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:40, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:48:24 -0700, Alan says...
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos".
You stupid fuck... they didn't "fake" the tattoos. They simply put
Nope. If they'd done that, they would have SAID that.
They did say that.
Then you'll have no trouble quoting it, will you?
And we all know that when you can provide support, you do, don't we?
:-)
You have seen the tatoos. You have read the article. Stop
being stupid.
In article <vudreu$1vu9u$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com53ELGcIDs0JzukKqZVIski7xPRabzPnPrVFhYGl6pFqwwoNg34zXtB3U66eaEz_YPSNYTDVPxhjAQ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjevKqLlfGMAxW_weYEHUKZAe4QtKgLegQIExAB&biw=1618&bih=886&dpr=2>
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:23, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:51:16 -0700, Alan says...
2 judges said he was MS13. I believe them.
No.
Two judges accepted a report written by a disgraced cop.
So... you are saying that absolutely, Garcia is not MS-13.
I'm saying that it is far from proven that he is part of MS13.
You don't wear the signs if you're not in.
Gotcha.
If he's not MS-13, then WHY did his punching bag(wife) cover them up
in this video?
Andy Ngo found Abrego Garcia's wife covered up with hearts on his
knuckles his tattoos of Marijuana "M" a Smiley "S" and the #s 1 and
3-MS-13-if they were OK why cover them up?
Because that's where her heart is in the photo?
Nice excuse. The tats are real.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, has
strategically censored her partner's left hand in the photo she
uploaded on her TikTok to promote her GoFundMe.
@nayibbukele, can you release the full resolution photos from the
photoshoot meeting he had with @ChrisVanHollen? The tattoos appear
to be a marijuana leaf, a smile and the number 13.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1913308669883854848/vid/
avc1/720x1280/Xfq8IrgY0gO-2w8W.mp4?tag=16
Here are actual MS13 gang tattoos:
<https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&sca_esv=1243c2b95c154fbe&q=ms13+tattoos&udm=2&fbs=ABzOT_CWdhQLP1FcmU5B0fn3xuWpA-dk4wpBWOGsoR7DG5zJBq3yjtZsyDrI40y5Sp313Qo9yeEYj9D2EYI66a6sNSuja9foUUTSG3xx0IUuYsG2ky3os2hDz-zm1_9Yl0ioNZWMk-C76w1W2rSY_
Note how completely free from this alleged code you (and Trump) have
invented.
Who says? Some garbage from biased Google that has no
affiliation with gangs?
On 2025-04-24 10:45, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vudr5u$1vtst$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.comwhat the tattoos meant.
says...
On 2025-04-24 07:33, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vuccah$nned$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:40, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:48:24 -0700, Alan says...
You stupid fuck... they didn't "fake" the tattoos. They simply putThe tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1> >>>>>>>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos". >>>>>>
Nope. If they'd done that, they would have SAID that.
They did say that.
Then you'll have no trouble quoting it, will you?
And we all know that when you can provide support, you do, don't we?
:-)
You have seen the tatoos. You have read the article. Stop
being stupid.
And I've read the report by the Prince George Police Department that
lists his supposed signs of being in a gang...
...and that it doesn't list tattoos as one of them.
On 2025-04-24 10:51, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vudsqf$1vu9u$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-24 10:18, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:48:33 -0700, Alan says...
You stupid fuck... they didn't "fake" the tattoos. They simply
put what the tattoos meant.
Nope. If they'd done that, they would have SAID that.
"They" did, you stupid fuck.
Nope.
A close look at the photo shows obvious signs that the letters are,
in fact, intentionally added LABELS applied to explain the symbols
confirmed in other photos of Abrego Garcia's left hand.
Nope.
and away he runs.
Someone made an empty claim and I deny its truth.
How is that running away?
:-)
In article <vudsrs$1vu9u$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
controlled by Democrats with a Democrat President.
On 2025-04-24 10:18, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:51:32 -0700, Alan says...
...and congress is controlled by Trump sycophants
So?
Congress has NEVER investigated a Democrat, when Congress was
You're the one reaching, PusseyBoi.
Reach, brother-fucker... REACH!
Congress has called for an investigation by the IG of the DoD.
So? The loony left will be doing that shit for the next 3
1/2 years. Anything to disrupt.
In article <vuduir$240aq$7@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-24 10:50, Skeeter OG wrote:
In article <vudric$1vu9u$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
On 2025-04-23 20:23, AlleyCat wrote:
Nope. The reports were presented TO judges.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:45:04 -0700, Alan says...
The reports
No.
They were hearsay.
The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay
From two JUDGES, not anonymous sources.
Judges don't issue reports in cases like this: they make RULINGS.
Those rulings are based on testimony and evidence presented, and hearsay >> >> is typically not allowed.
ell it was allowed so I guess it wasn't "hearsay".
Nope. That's not how reality works.
So if it was then why did they allow it?
You really don't understand how the judicial process works, do you?
Like the judge that had gang members living with him?
1. Illegal immigrant, not gang member.
Gang member with weapons.
2. That that person listed that as his address, doesn't mean it was.
He was living there. Proof that some judges are in bed
with the cartel.
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:13:02 -0700, Alan says...
Andy Ngo found Abrego Garcia's wife covered up with hearts on his
knuckles his tattoos of Marijuana "M" a Smiley "S" and the #s 1 and
3-MS-13-if they were OK why cover them up?
Because that's where her heart is in the photo?
You are a fucking idiot.
1) the picture was taken in front of a mirror.
2) and BECAUSE the picture is reversed... aside from human hearts being >mostly centered in the body and only SLIGHTLY to the
left, the red hearts are covering her RIGHT breast, NOT her heart, and >Garcia's finger tattoos, you fucking dork.
Even if the picture wasn't reversed, those hearts would be no where NEAR
her heart. But since the pic IS reversed, it's OBVIOUS
she's covering his finger tattoos.
3) The illegal's tattoos are on his LEFT arm, you fucking moronic rich boy.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1913308669883854848/vid/avc1/720x1280/Xfq8IrgY0gO-2w8W.mp4?tag=16
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Go3zUkQX0AAgHvq?format=jpg&name=large
God DAMN you are an idiot.
===============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a
person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in
the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into
three distinct phases or stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of
proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm,
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's >vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting
solely of hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish
fantasy from reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the
knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever
made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one.
thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received
positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the
early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was
a punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first >coined by the late conservative columnist Charles
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was
"the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people
in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence
of George W. Bush."
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:48:33 -0700, Alan says...
what the tattoos meant.
On 2025-04-23 20:40, AlleyCat wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:48:24 -0700, Alan says...
The tats on his fingers and the judges and associations of
his.
The photo Trump showed was altered to include "M S 1 3"...
<https://www.politifact.com/article/2025/apr/22/abrego-garcia-finger-tattoos-trump/>
<https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1913358867708493982/photo/1>
There's Donald's photo... ...including obviously faked "tattoos".
You stupid fuck... they didn't "fake" the tattoos. They simply put
Nope. If they'd done that, they would have SAID that.
It's IN the picture, you stupid fuck.
Everybody knows that what Trump held up wasn't what Garcia has on his >fingers. It was NOTATION, stupid.
the act, process, method, or an instance of representing by a system or
set of marks, signs, figures, or characters
God DAMN you're stupid.
===============================================================================
"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.
"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a
person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in
the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into
three distinct phases or stages:
"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of
proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm,
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's >vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting
solely of hyperbole."
"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish
fantasy from reality."
The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the
knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever
made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one.
thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received
positively by TDSers.
The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the
early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was
a punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.
Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first >coined by the late conservative columnist Charles
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was
"the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people
in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence
of George W. Bush."
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 498 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 60:22:35 |
| Calls: | 9,812 |
| Files: | 13,754 |
| Messages: | 6,191,177 |