• Re: Approximately 97% Or 98% of Our Trade Deficit Is With 15 Countries

    From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Tue May 6 19:24:55 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2025-05-06 18:32, AlleyCat wrote:

    Sec. Scott Bessent: "I would think that perhaps as early as this
    week we will be announcing trade deals with some of our largest
    trading partners."

    "There are 18 very important trading relationships. We are currently negotiating with 17 of those trading partners. China, we have not
    engaged in negotiations with as of yet, so... I expect that we can
    see a substantial reduction in the tariffs that we are being
    charged. Approximately 97% or 98% of our trade deficit is with 15
    countries. 18% of the countries are our major trading partners, and
    I would be surprised that if we don't have more than 80% or 90% of
    those wrapped up by the end of the year. And that may be much
    sooner... that I would think that perhaps as early as this week we
    will be announcing trade deals with some of our largest trading
    partners." - Secretary of Treasury, Scott Bessent
    Hey, you know what he also said from the same interview?

    'China, we have not engaged in negotiations with as of yet.'

    So that directly contradicts your other posts, doesn't it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Wed May 7 09:22:52 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2025-05-06 22:27, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Tue, 6 May 2025 19:24:55 -0700, Alan says...

    So that directly contradicts your other posts, doesn't it?

    Nope.

    Like I said in another post.

    ANY contact with China ABOUT tariffs, is "negotiating/negotiations".

    No. It is not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Wed May 7 20:21:50 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2025-05-07 20:02, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Wed, 7 May 2025 09:22:52 -0700, Alan says...


    On 2025-05-06 22:27, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Tue, 6 May 2025 19:24:55 -0700, Alan says...

    So that directly contradicts your other posts, doesn't it?

    Nope.

    Like I said in another post.

    ANY contact with China ABOUT tariffs, is "negotiating/
    negotiations".

    No. It is not.

    So, why call them at all, if they're not negotiating?

    Trump: "Hi, Xi... just callin' to say herro!"

    "Herro!"
    Sorry, but Trump asking to negotiate is not negotiatING.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoBody@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu May 8 07:25:21 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On Wed, 7 May 2025 09:22:52 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-05-06 22:27, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Tue, 6 May 2025 19:24:55 -0700, Alan says...

    So that directly contradicts your other posts, doesn't it?

    Nope.

    Like I said in another post.

    ANY contact with China ABOUT tariffs, is "negotiating/negotiations".

    No. It is not.


    Laughter...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoBody@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu May 8 07:26:44 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On Wed, 7 May 2025 09:22:52 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-05-06 22:27, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Tue, 6 May 2025 19:24:55 -0700, Alan says...

    So that directly contradicts your other posts, doesn't it?

    Nope.

    Like I said in another post.

    ANY contact with China ABOUT tariffs, is "negotiating/negotiations".

    No. It is not.

    Meanwhile things aren't going so well in China...

    "Furious factory workers in China are protesting over unpaid wages, as President Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods begin to weigh on the
    country's economy. Reports from Radio Free Asia indicate that protests
    have erupted nationwide, with workers taking to the streets over
    unpaid wages and unfair layoffs after factory closures linked to
    pressure from U.S. tariffs.

    At the same time, Chinese industry leaders are reportedly "extremely
    anxious" about the high import duties that were imposed by Trump last
    month. Wang Xin, the head of an industry group representing more than
    2,000 Chinese businesses, told the Financial Times that several
    factories and suppliers are being asked to halt or delay shipments."

    https://www.ibtimes.sg/protests-erupt-china-furious-factory-workers-demand-unpaid-wages-trump-tariffs-cripple-economy-79798

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Thu May 8 13:25:45 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2025-05-07 21:49, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Wed, 7 May 2025 20:21:50 -0700, Alan says...


    On 2025-05-07 20:02, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Wed, 7 May 2025 09:22:52 -0700, Alan says...


    On 2025-05-06 22:27, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Tue, 6 May 2025 19:24:55 -0700, Alan says...

    So that directly contradicts your other posts, doesn't it?

    Nope.

    Like I said in another post.

    ANY contact with China ABOUT tariffs, is "negotiating/
    negotiations".

    No. It is not.

    So, why call them at all, if they're not negotiating?

    Trump: "Hi, Xi... just callin' to say herro!"

    "Herro!"

    Sorry, but Trump asking to negotiate is not negotiatING.

    Another "that's beside the point", moment.

    Contact with a co8untry over the phone or "other" is ALWAYS
    negotiatING, no matter the intent or topic.

    No. This is you trying to twist things around so you can continue to
    believe that Trump isn't lying to you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)