XPost: alt.politics.immigration, sac.politics, misc.legal
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns

President Donald Trump has been personally involved in discussions
inside the administration over potentially suspending habeas corpus, a
legal procedure that allows people to challenge their detention in
court, two people familiar with the consideration told CNN.

One of Trump’s top aides, Stephen Miller, confirmed publicly Friday that
the administration was “actively looking at” suspending habeas corpus,
adding that it “depends on whether the courts do the right thing or
not.”

Both the private discussions and Miller’s public comments show this is
under serious consideration inside the West Wing.

While Trump has not explicitly mentioned habeas corpus in public, it’s
what he was referencing last month when he commented on steps he could
take to combat nationwide injunctions against his actions on
deportations, according to one of the people familiar with the talks.

“There are ways to mitigate it and there’s some very strong ways,” Trump
told reporters April 30. “There’s one way that’s been used by three very
highly respected presidents, but we hope we don’t have to go that route.
But there is one way used successfully by three presidents – all highly respected – and hopefully we don’t have to go that way but there are
ways of mitigating it.”

It remains unclear whether this is something the administration will
actually pursue, and experts say it will likely generate legal
challenges. The White House declined to comment beyond Miller’s
statement.

“Essentially everything Miller says about suspending habeas corpus –
which would eliminate the ability of the courts to rule on immigration
matters – is wrong,” CNN senior legal analyst and former federal
prosecutor Elie Honig said.

“The Constitution makes clear that suspension of habeas corpus is to be reserved for actual rebellion or invasion posing the most dire threats
to public safety. And Congress has never passed a law authorizing
deportations without any court involvement, as Miller suggests.”

The Constitution only allows habeas corpus to be suspended when “in
Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”

Miller’s comments pick up on ongoing efforts by the Trump administration
to use the current state of illegal border crossings to claim that the
US is under invasion – which the administration says allows the
government to eschew due process protections afforded to migrants. The administration is making a similar argument in defending Trump’s
invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, which would allow the government to quickly deport migrants without adherence to such due process
procedures.

Multiple judges, including a Trump appointee, have rejected the
invocation, saying in rulings that the administration hadn’t shown the
United States is under invasion by a hostile foreign power, as laid out
under the 18th century statute.

The Trump administration has also been examining whether it can label
some suspected cartel and gang members inside the US as “enemy
combatants” as a possible way to detain them more easily and complicate
their ability to challenge their imprisonment, CNN previously reported.

Suspending the writ of habeas corpus would take Trump’s efforts even
farther – allowing the government to detain migrants without giving them
the opportunity to challenge that detention, essentially letting the administration detain people without providing justification.

“The writ of habeas corpus has been suspended a number of times, but
only in times of actual war or actual invasion, narrowly defined,” Ilya
Somin, a professor of law at George Mason University, told CNN in
January.

While the Constitution does not explicitly require Congress’ approval
for such a suspension, it’s long been understood that the legislature
would likely need to play that role, as the late conservative Justice
Antonin Scalia has noted in a dissent.

Somin said some states have also tried to claim, starting in the 1990s,
that illegal immigration amounted to an invasion that would allow them
to engage in war or to disregard federal laws that restrict immigration enforcement.

“Every time courts have ruled on this, they have ruled against the
states,” Somin said.

Trump administration officials have made it clear that they believe the judicial branch is hindering their ability to enforce immigration laws. President Donald Trump has personally attacked judges in public
statements, and Miller has likened court rulings against the
administration to a “judicial coup.”

In a sign of the mounting pressure, Chief Justice John Roberts stressed
the importance of judicial independence during public remarks Wednesday.

“The judiciary is a coequal branch of government, separate from the
others with the authority to interpret the Constitution as law and
strike down, obviously, acts of Congress or acts of the president,”
Roberts said at an event in his native Buffalo, New York.

The judiciary’s role, Roberts added, is to “decide cases but, in the
course of that, check the excesses of Congress or the executive.”

https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/09/politics/miller-habeas-corpus-immigrant-ju
dge

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)