XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican
On 2025-05-10 22:35, AlleyCat wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2025 21:59:08 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-05-10 21:50, AlleyCat wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2025 17:25:01 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-05-10 06:02, AlleyCat wrote:
On Fri, 09 May 2025 23:29:36 -0700, Siri Cruz says...
On 9/5/25 22:40, Gronk wrote:
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5292820-white-house-miller-immigration-crackdown/
White House deputy chief of staff Stephen
Miller said Friday that President Trump
and his team are ?actively looking at?
suspending habeas corpus as part of the
administration?s immigration crackdown.
Even though the Constitution clearly denies the president that power. >>>>>
Who said HE was going to be the one to do it?
So who would be doing it, then?
If you don't know...
You're the one claiming it wouldn't necessarily be him, so...
It won't necessarily be him.
WHO said it would be?
Show us... WHERE is it said that Trump would or would not be:
"White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said Friday that President Trump and his team are 'actively looking at'
suspending habeas corpus as part of the administration's immigration crackdown."
I'm looking at it too... doesn't mean I'll be the one "doing it".
Wow. Semantic games are really all you have.
What Stephen Miller said (in greater fullness) is:
'“The Constitution is clear, and that, of course, is the supreme law of
the land, that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus can be
suspended at a time of invasion. So I would say that’s an action we’re actively looking at,” Miller said in the White House driveway.
“A lot of it depends on whether the courts do the right thing or not,” Miller said.'
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)