• Re: It's Not Grifting At All, When There Are OTHER Satellite Companies

    From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Tue May 13 09:39:10 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2025-05-12 22:05, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Mon, 12 May 2025 19:14:30 -0700, Alan says...

    'A series of internal government messages obtained by The Post
    reveal how U.S. embassies and the State Department have pushed
    nations to clear hurdles for U.S. satellite companies

    "CompanIES"?

    If they're asking for "cleared hurdles" for MULTIPLE companies,
    what's the problem.

    Look where you snipped the quote!

    ", often mentioning Starlink by name."




    As usual, Wipeyourassington Post with our newspaper is lying by
    omission.

    They left out the part about naming OTHER satellite companIES.

    They saying only, "often mentioning Starlink by name", is a lie by
    omission.

    And you omitting this is...

    "But they [the internal government messages] do indicate that Secretary
    of State Marco Rubio has increasingly instructed officials to push for regulatory approvals for MUSK'S SATELLITE FIRM at a moment when the
    White House is calling for wide-ranging talks on trade."

    You think ANY of the countries involved never asked about OTHER
    satellite companies and Rubio simply refused to talk about ANY of
    the "others"?

    Riiiiiight.

    The documents do not show that the Trump team has explicitly
    demanded favors for Starlink in exchange for lower tariffs.

    "State Marco Rubio has increasingly instructed officials to push for
    regulatory approvals for MUSK'S SATELLITE FIRM at a moment when the
    White House is calling for wide-ranging talks on trade."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to AlleyCat on Thu May 22 16:50:18 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican

    On 2025-05-13 21:44, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Tue, 13 May 2025 09:39:10 -0700, Alan says...

    On 2025-05-12 22:05, AlleyCat wrote:

    On Mon, 12 May 2025 19:14:30 -0700, Alan says...

    'A series of internal government messages obtained by The Post
    reveal how U.S. embassies and the State Department have pushed
    nations to clear hurdles for U.S. satellite companies

    "CompanIES"?

    If they're asking for "cleared hurdles" for MULTIPLE companies,
    what's the problem.

    Look where you snipped the quote!

    ", often mentioning Starlink by name."

    I can't believe how fucking stupid you are.

    Read it again.
    Read this:

    'In early February, Sharon Cromer, U.S. ambassador to Gambia, went to
    visit one of the country’s Cabinet ministers at his agency’s
    headquarters, above a partially abandoned strip mall off a dirt road. It
    had been two weeks since President Donald Trump took office, and Cromer
    had pressing business to discuss. She needed the minister to fall in
    line to help Elon Musk.

    Starlink, Musk’s satellite internet company, had spent months trying to secure regulatory approval to sell internet access in the impoverished
    West African country. As head of Gambia’s communications ministry, Lamin Jabbi oversees the government’s review of Starlink’s license
    application. Jabbi had been slow to sign off and the company had grown impatient. Now the top U.S. government official in Gambia was in Jabbi’s office to intervene.'

    <https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-musk-starlink-state-department-gambia-africa-pressure>

    'In recent months, senior State Department officials in both Washington
    and Gambia have coordinated with Starlink executives to coax, lobby and browbeat at least seven Gambian government ministers to help Musk,
    records and interviews show. One of those Cabinet officials told
    ProPublica his government is under “maximum pressure” to yield.'

    'The saga in Gambia is the starkest known example of the Trump
    administration wielding the U.S. government’s foreign policy apparatus
    to advance the business interests of Musk, a top Trump adviser and the world’s richest man.

    Since Trump’s inauguration, the State Department has intervened on
    behalf of Starlink in Gambia and at least four other developing nations, previously unreported records and interviews show.

    As the Trump administration has gutted foreign aid, U.S. diplomats have
    pressed governments to fast-track licenses for Starlink and arranged conversations between company employees and foreign leaders. In cables,
    U.S. officials have said that for their foreign counterparts, helping
    Starlink is a chance to prove their commitment to good relations with
    the U.S.'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)