XPost: alt.radio.talk, alt.politics.usa

On Tuesday’s Mark Levin Show, President Trump deserves great credit for the trillions of dollars he’s bringing into our country from foreign governments and overseas corporations! It’s absolutely unprecedented! Trump’s speech in Saudi Arabia included some of the lines used by the Soros-Koch isolationist crowd about neocons and interventionists, but the irony is that it was given
in the context of a globalist outreach effort to make economic and military deals with and between Middle East monarchies/dictatorships and the biggest
of America’s globalists/internationalists/corporatists. Also, in On Power, there’s a stark contrast between America’s founding, rooted in a blend of
faith and Enlightenment ideals, and the centralized control sought by
political Islam, as highlighted by Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, a Muslim reformist.
Jasser argues that Islamism, unlike the Judeo-Christian principles shaping America’s Constitution, rejects individual liberty and enforces a monolithic faith, often tied to anti-Israel and anti-Semitic agendas, as seen in groups like the Muslim Brotherhood. Drawing from Alexis de Tocqueville and Jasser’s insights, Mark explores how Islamists, inspired by figures like Sayyid Qutb, aim to dismantle Western society, viewed as ignorant of divine guidance, to impose a rigid “pure Islam.” This clash of ideologies, coupled with the deceptive language of tyrannies like Islamism and Marxism, underscores the battle for liberty and the soul of nations. Later, neocons, many of whom were former Jewish Democrats, left the Democratic Party and adopted a hawkish foreign policy stance. While many are no longer alive, today, some avoid blaming Jews for pushing war, instead pointing to neocons as the instigators. Opposing Iran’s nuclear ambitions is patriotism, not neoconservatism, due to Iran’s terrorist activities and history of violating agreements. Finally, Ken Hartman, Founder & President of Our Community Salutes, calls in to discuss
his national nonprofit organization, which is dedicated to recognizing and supporting high school seniors who plan to enlist in the U.S. Armed Services after graduation. Their goal is to get 250,000 Americans to sign a thank you card to our nation’s newest enlistees in the military.

Rough transcription of Hour 1

Segment 1
Hello, America. Mark Levin here, our number 877-381-3811. 877-381-3811. So, Mr. Producer, you sent me this article right before the show from a website that is sort of the media matters wannabes site filled with reprobates morons and. Their ilk. And so now I have to make a decision. Do I address Chatsworth Osborne Jr as Rush column or do I wait? And I’m grinding my teeth, biting the bit. To address Chatsworth Osborne Jr. But let me do it this way. I’m sure
you have my phone number. If something you want to say, be a man. Pick up
your damn phone and call me. Don’t twist my words and then pat yourself in
the head with some clown sitting next to. I don’t even know who this guy is. Honestly, I don’t watch, but I’m just saying. Feel free. And maybe. And maybe I’ll take this battle public day in, day out, day in, day out. But it is a waste of time. And just plays into the hands of the leftists. But I got to do what I got to do. Reading is fundamental. Read. Give me a call. Chatsworth. Chatsworth Rush Star has it on his website. It was a character from Dobie Gillis in the 1960s. You can check the Internet. Mr. Producer says, No, no,
no, no, I’ve done it. I’m telling you, I’m ready to roll. I really am. But
I’m going to hold back right now. And you guys, that media is disgusting. He just this guy you exist to do stupid stuff was stupid headlines. Then he gets suckers who are hooked on it regurgitated. But it’s important that people
learn how to read. It’s important that they they learn how to reason. And so we’re more than happy. You got my number, pal. Pick up your damn phone and
call it. Now let me move on. First of all, I want to thank you, folks. This book on power is in the top 100 on Amazon, and I spoke about it for about 30
or 40 minutes yesterday. And you are patriotic, intelligent, smart people. That’s what you are. That’s why you’re here. That’s why you watch the Fox
show while you watch the show. Millions and millions of you. Because you’re curious. Because you’re intelligent. Things are going on that are upsetting you. And me too. And so I told you, I’m going to give you just a little
flavor here in there of what’s in the book. Just a little touch, because
that’s all I’m allowed to do. Quite frankly, my discussions with the
publisher. And I can sit here and read the book to you. There will be an
audio if you’re interested. But it relates to what’s taking place for even right now in the Middle East. And let me say a couple of things about that. First and foremost. Number one, credit where credit is due, President Trump
is literally bringing trillions and trillions of dollars into this country.
He literally is bringing trillions and trillions of dollars into this
country. And we’ve never seen anything like it. And obviously that’s going to have positive consequences on the workforce. Re industrialization of America and so forth. I’ve talked about the tariffs before. And what I believe is purposes. Any succeeding. But also, if you can get the Saudis and others to spend hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars and buying things from us rather than communist China, that’s a good thing. The president deserves
great credit for this. It’s absolutely unprecedented. Then I watched the president’s speech was very, very interesting to me. And I thought to myself, is he promoting isolationism or globalism or both? And what I posted is actually Podesta’s speech, because here the the Jewish insider. Has this provocative title, Trump Embrace His Isolationist Worldview and Riyadh
Speech. And then I got to thinking, the speech is a lot different than the action. So I posted actually produce a speech included some of the lines used by the Soros Coke isolationist crowd about neo cons and interventionists. But the irony is that it was given in the context of a globalist outreach effort
to make economic and military deals with and between Middle East monarchies
and dictatorships and the biggest American globalists, internationalists and corporatists in our country. Now we don’t know the details, but if they’re great deals for we the people, that’s wonderful. And I truly believe the president is the best at making great deals. But this looks to me like globalism wrapped in isolationist language. I’m just using their language. We have the globalists and the internationalists are I call them corporatists.
The most wealthy on the face of the earth. From America. Meeting with these these incredibly wealthy monarchs and dictators in Saudi Arabia. Which is swimming in oil. We’re tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars in a tiny little monarchy. To make deals. Financial deals, economic deals,
military deals. And I understand even a security arrangement is being worked out. Now, that’s not interventionism, but it’s certainly globalism. And you know, it’s funny when some of these people like Chatsworth, Osborne Junior
and others were interventionists and militarists and all the rest, I wrote a book called Liberty and Tyranny and in Liberty and Tyranny, I have an entire chapter. On Iraq. Now, we were all kind of suckered into the Iraq thing. We
all were. Even the isolationists and others of us. But that aside, I warned about globalism. I actually used the word and globalism to me means surrendering. Our sovereignty to international organizations, whether they be economic, whether they be environmental, whether they be governing like the U.N.. Because these organizations are the opposite of representative government. They’re the opposite of the consent of the government. You and I have no say in any of these international organizations or what I call these global institutions. We have no say in them whatsoever. So I reject it and I reject it before Most people reject it, but I reject it. Now, that doesn’t
mean you shouldn’t be involved in the international scene, but a lot of these people. With podcasts and subscription platforms. They aren’t clear or
precise about what they’re talking about. They commingle words. They throw around slogans. Like neocon. You know what a neocon is. Historically, a
neocon is a person in the fifties and sixties that was sort of a moderate Democrat, much like Tucker’s father, I believe, but a moderate Democrat. Who say, wait a minute. The Democrat Party is gone, left wing nuts and the Soviet Union’s on the rise. And so they reconsidered their associations, they reconsidered their viewpoints, and they moved away from that, rightly so.
Like Jeane Kirkpatrick, who was a genius, brilliant. A professor at
Georgetown who Reagan appointed as his national security adviser excuse me,
as his ambassador to the United Nations. And he appointed Democrats like that throughout his administration. Those were the neocons, neo conservatives. That’s the best definition there is for that, because there’s really no specific definition, but that’s who they basically were. So it has absolutely no relevance to today. They throw this term around. I’ve been subjected to
it. Others have been subjected to it. Maybe not Chatsworth, but others as a pejorative for you. Or Israel First Honors or something like that. They know they’re doing it. We know they’re doing it, and many of them are open about
it. And so when you use that phrase, especially when you’re Jewish, you’re an idiot. You don’t even know what you’re saying. Other people use it. They’re
not idiots. They actually know what they’re saying. But that’s not my point.
My point is different than that. Let me read a little to you from on power.
And this is from the middle of chapter three on negative power. America, like much of the West, was born from the fusion of faith and enlightenment. And I spent a lot of time explaining the faith aspect of it, the enlightenment
aspect of it, and so forth. I actually wrote that months and months and
months ago. But it’s but it’s something that’s very important. I think as
such, while faith is distinct from government. The latter being the organization of law by and through a manmade institutions. The fusion of
which I speak informed the authors of America’s Declaration and Constitution. On the prudent and humane order of government affairs. Again. I explained
that at length, but I’m not going to read that. Here’s what I want to get to. By contrast, for example, political Islam is Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, a prominent Muslim scholar, founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy and a leader in the Muslim reform movement, refers to it, among others, seeks the centralized control. Think about these terrorist organizations and their ilk. Think about Qatar as a perfect example. Seeks the centralized control over mine, body, society and government. He explains, and I quote him Islam has
yet to go through an enlightenment and reform against theocracy and for individual liberty and universal human rights. The dominant establishment of the Muslim community in the West and abroad supports Islamism and its believers. The Islamists. Like theocrats, Islamists and their sympathizers
see faith as monolithic and do not tolerate diversity of interpretation. Now recounting his days in college, Jasser explains that Muslim campus groups promoted a form of Muslim identity that, quote, wasn’t about faith, but
rather about their political agenda, and especially their anti-Israel
motives, their anti-Semitism. It was pretty much dominated by the Palestinian movement. Now, of course, he’s a muslim, and there are incredible massive numbers of Muslims who do not agree with the Islamists or the jihadists, and many of them are killed in the Middle East. They’re slaughtered. Jasser
argues that. The people of the Muslim faith deserve much better than this. He notes that the vast majority of Muslims are still a constituency that are not spoken for by anybody. Got that. And I agree with that. Hopefully we can grow our bandwidth to do that. Very, very important points by just Alexis de Tocqueville. And democracy in America is two volumes. He put it this way
Mahama professed to derive from heaven. And he is inserted in the Koran, not only a body of religious doctrines, but political maxims. Civil and criminal laws. You won’t find this in Judaism, Christianity, or most other faiths and theories of science. The Gospel, on the contrary, only speaks of the general relationship of men to God and to each other beyond which it inculcates and imposes no point of faith. Indeed in America today, Jasser notes that Muslim Brotherhood legacy groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations, Islamic Society of North America, Islamic Circle of North America, Muslim Students Association, Muslim Public Affairs Council do not accept that devout Muslims exist who reject their ideas. Now, this is very important. I have to take a hard break. I want to continue this so you fully understand what I’m saying. That’s not taken out of context. This is from on power. You can get
it at Amazon.com or on any of my social sites. We’ll be right back.

Segment 2
You know, I’ve tried have tried, Mr. Producer, but I really can’t control myself. So I think next hour I will talk further about Chatsworth. Osborne
Jr, what do you think of that? I’ll explain why you got that name. I’ll
explain who gave it to her and why. I’m. On power. You can get it right now
on Amazon.com. You know, there’s a term in there. I looked at some of their terms at Amazon and they make the point and I want to underscore this, if you preorder the book, even if it’s two and a half months from now, the lowest discount they give during that period of time and they’re going to cut it. That’s what they do it to generate as many sales as they can. You will get
it, so you don’t need to worry about that. That’s number one. Number two, I know you’re going to love this book. I actually, unlike most, wrote it. Most people don’t even read the books. They put their names on every single syllable. But this issue is very, very important. And they only have about 30 seconds right now in the segment about a completely different mindset that these terrorists and terrorist states have, like Qatar versus we in the West. I’ll be right back.

Segment 3
Now let me pick up where they left off it. Very important in his book how I’m going to get my magnifying glass here in his book. Now, this is in my book on power. Again, you can grab it at Amazon.com. A Battle for the Soul of Islam. Jasser decries the preaching and writing of somebody named Saeed Kuttab. Now, you might say, who’s Saeed Kuttab? He’s known throughout. The Muslim world, especially in the Middle East, one of the most prominent thought leaders of
the Muslim Brotherhood and political Islam. And he explains that while the roots of Islamism can be traced back hundreds of years again, as opposed to. Muslims are talking about Islamists with the ideas of pure Islam. That’s what they call a pure Islam. Khartoum’s 1964 book Milestones has significant influence even now. Now, as I point out, two often mentions. G h i l y y h j how you Jabalya which he defines as the state of ignorance of the guidance of God. Here’s what he writes in part, What is extremely significant about this
is that tubes view the entire Western world was riddled with Yahia the same time he concerted most Muslims of his time to be suffering from such
ignorance. Zahir due to what he considered by watering down through the ages
of pure Islam in part because of Western influences, but also due to what he considered Muslims tampering with the purity of Islam so that it no longer existed. Now, this is what we’re dealing with in Qatar, in Iran, among other places. Kateb saw it as his mission to revive pure Islam with its very strict interpretation of Sharia law and to never give an inch in terms of adapting
or compromising with Western values, which he considered devoted to materialism, violence and racism. And then finally, as Jasper notes in his book, here’s what could to be writes I’m quoting from Katoomba Book. Our foremost objective now, this is the Muslim Brotherhood, what sprung from the Muslim Brotherhood. He wasn’t the first, but he was one of the most influential. It is what’s read now by Islamic Jihad, by Hamas, by the Islamo Nazi regime in Iran and the Islamic not to regime in Qatar and so forth and
so on. Kateb wrote, Our foremost objective is to change the practices of this society. Our aim is to change the Charlie system and its very roots. That’s
the West. This system, which is fundamentally at variance with Islam, and which, with the help of force and oppression, is keeping us from living the sort of life which is demanded by our Creator. Our first step will be to
raise ourselves above the Charlie society, Western society, and all it causes and its concepts. We will not change our own values and concepts either more
or less, to make a bargain with this Charlie Society. Never. We and it are on different roads. And if we take even one step in its company, we will lose
our goal entirely and lose our way as well. That’s quotes. There’s more in
the book, but I’m just giving a little touch of this. Consequently, as I
point out, the constant bloody wars among different Muslim sacks, including
in Syria, in Yemen, in Lebanon and elsewhere, and the targeting of the West
by a long list of Islamist organizations such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Al Qaeda, as well as Islamist states that support terrorism, such as Iran and Qatar and others, provide ample evidence of the bloody Islamist impact, both within individual countries and throughout the world on Muslims and non- Muslims alike. Like Marxists, Islamists obviously reject liberty, but Marxism rejects faith altogether and in fact insists on the eradication of not only faith, but like Islamists, all historical and social ties. They contradict or compete with its ideology and delay or interfere with the inevitable revolution. And it goes on in a much more comprehensive way where I explain
and talk about the fusion of Marxism and Islamism and again, the mindset. Of Islamists, the mindset of Marxists. And this is in the chapter where I talk about negative power. So when you read this book, you read that section. There’s a lot more to this book, the Marxists and the Islamists. It’s about
on power, its effect on your life, its effect on whether you’re free or
you’re not free. Look, there have been great. Philosophers throughout
history. They’ve written about it. Probably a score of them. I mean, Socrates talked about it, Plato wrote about it, Aristotle wrote about it, Cicero wrote about it, Hobbes wrote about it. I can go on and on and on and in more modern times and so forth. But that’s not what I’m writing about. What they wrote about is not what I’m writing about. And they try to apply it to everyday America, too. Mr. and Mrs. America. What’s going on in our country? What’s going on outside our country? How it affects us? A lot of focus on what’s
going on with our government right now. The judges right now, what they’re doing to President Trump. Again, it’s a piece of it. A lot of focus on the Democrat Party, what they advance in terms of negative power, negative language, what it is that they do that influences and in fact, in so many
ways controls our country. I also talk about. The belief system of. Jews and Christians do Judeo-Christian concepts and understandings, how completely different they are than from the Islamists. They know it and we know it. And
so when we negotiate. With a Qatar or or an Iran. We’re not just them when we tolerate. The invasion. People from these parts of the world who are
inculcated with that ideology and have no intention of assimilating into Americanism. It has a consequence on our country. It has a consequence on our colleges and our universities and throughout our country. And so you’re going to learn about all this, the people who are involved in it. As well as more
and more about our own country. Our sovereignty, where that comes from, our belief system. Why we live in a country like this that is diverse and accepts diversity. And why people live in other types of countries where they don’t really even kill people of their own faith because they’re not pure enough. Chapter one is on power. Chapter two is on negative power. The way I
segregate this, Chapter three is on positive power. You’ll certainly
understand that as time goes on, or at least my representation of it. Chapter four is on language. It’s critical. Chapter five is on rights. Chapter six is on liberty. As I said, I’ve written ten books. Eight. Number one New York
Times bestsellers. Millions and millions of you reading these books, as are millions and millions of you listening to this program on every available platform. We’ve talked about liberty a lot. We’ve talked about rights a lot.
We haven’t talked about a lot, although we’ve talked about it in the sense of references to it. Is power. Power. And it is a way of rethinking through, rethinking through, or at least adjusting somewhat how we think about what’s taking place day to day in our own country. Actually, in your own community
and certainly. With foreign governments. And how so many of them literally
from a mindset, an ideology. Look at things completely differently than we
do. And this is one of my concerns. When we’re dealing with Islamist regimes, terrorist regimes. I mean, on the face they’re terrorist regimes. They’re called terrorist regimes for a reason. That means they don’t believe in civility. They don’t believe and so forth and so on. And what you’ll find
more in the book is there’s an it there’s even a word in an ideology. For the Islamists that they use among each other. About deceit. And in the chapter on negative power, I talk about communication. The chapter about language. I
talk about what kind of language is used, you know, in tyrannies, whether
they be Marxist, fascist Islamists, whatever they are. And by the way, in democracies too, more and more language is used to deceive, to confound, to confuse the public. More and more. So this is unlike any book I’ve ever written. It’s tighter. It’s more concise. There’s some quotes like the quote
I just read to you, but less quotes, more my analysis, my reasoning about
about these things. And it’s written for you, for you, the American people.
You can go to the link on Amazon.com directly or on my Twitter site or
through social site website. Mark Levin showed ICOM the mothership or any of these other social sites. You know, I don’t promote our social sites almost
at all, do I, Mr. Producer? We almost have 5 million followers on X and I
never even mention it. Maybe I should mention it so we can get up the 10 million, but it doesn’t matter. I’m not interested in the grift. I’m not interested in the hits. I’m not interested in the clicks. I am mission oriented. I’m an activist, but I want to inform. I want to provide you with information, at least from my perspective. You can check it out. You can disagree with. You can do whatever you want. But that’s where I’m coming
from. I’ll be right back.

Segment 4
Oh, it’s a damn shame. Major League Baseball waited until after Pete Rose
died. What do you think, Mr. Producer? To lift the ban from the Hall of
Fame? This is something you wanted to do right up to his death. He was in Chantilly, Virginia, not too far from where I am right now, doing a, you
know, signing, making a couple of bucks off of every signature with some of
the other retired baseball and other stars. And my daughter, my grandson got
to see him because my grandson loved Pete Rose. Pete Rose played a long time not just for Cincinnati, but the Philadelphia Phillies. He was one of a kind. He was a superstar. And again, without getting into the weeds here, this is something he wanted. He wanted to be in the Hall of Fame, and he will be
there posthumously, along with Joe Jackson. Another one of the greats. But
it’s too bad they waited after Rose died. That’s my take on it. How much time do I have, Rich? I think we should get started here. Hold on one second. Let
me see if I can find something. Now, Rush used to call our friend Tucker, who was a friend of mine. I mean, we didn’t socialize or anything, but Tucker’s
had Tucker’s kind of transition, if you will. He was first at The Weekly Standard, which I think he would call a thoroughly neocon magazine with his friend Bill Kristol. And I believe they’re friends anymore. I don’t know. I don’t keep track of either one, quite frankly. And so I guess he was a neocon at one point. In our eye. Now he is whatever he is. But Rice used to call him Chatsworth Osborne Junior, because he wore that kind of goofy tie at the time and he had a caller did Rush and this is still on his website. And Rush and I were best friends, so I knew all about it. He didn’t think much of
Chatsworth, but that’s neither here nor there. So caller calls and he says,
Hi, mega dittos. Rush My question is real simple Why Chatsworth Osborne Jr Well, you mean, why do I call Tucker Carlson sometimes? Chatsworth Osborne?
Jr Yeah, I call him that now. My wife says, Stop that laughing. Do you know
who Chatsworth Osborne Jr was? Oh, I Don’t you remember watching television show? How old are you? 60. I didn’t watch much TV, though. Well, there was a very, very popular TV show in the sixties called Dobie Gillis. Okay. I never saw that. It was a college kid program. Dobie Gillis was a college student
and his buddies were college kids. It was kind of like a college kid version
of Leave It to Beaver. And one of the characters was is uppity, elitist, snobbish, no, nothing character named Chatsworth Osborne JR You know who
would name a kid? Chatsworth. It’s obviously somebody’s last name.
Chatsworth. Osborne. Jr So the kid was a preppy and it’s a very affectionate nickname that I’ve developed for Tucker Carlson. I haven’t used in a long
time, but that is the source of it. You should YouTube Dobie Gillis and
you’ll see the character. Well, I’m going to now when I get home, I should be able to make it home tonight. You’ll probably recognize the actor who
portrays Chatsworth Osborne Jr. But that show is now the Sixties. That show
is close to 70 years old, and it was in black and white. And I don’t remember who starred as Dobie Gillis, but that was the name of the show. There are all kinds of great characters in it. It’s basically a bunch of smart ass little college kids. Even back then, it was just about their lives and how they interacted with the professors. I was nine or ten years old, said Rush. When the when the show ran on, I’m not even sure my memories that accurate. But
what you need to know is that it was an affectionate nickname. Yeah. Dwayne Hickman. That’s right. You’ll recognize him. Dwayne Hickman was Dobie Gillis, the star of the show. You’ll recognize Chatsworth Osborne Jr. He’s a
character actor. It’s been in a suit, shoes. I’ve been in stuff for 60 years. 50 years at least. Anyway, I’m glad you called out there, Mark. Not this
Mark. Now, that’s a great open line Friday Question mark. Were you offended
by that or were you worried that Schatzberg would be offended by it? Then he later says Rush after the raid. No, no, no, no, no. I was not describing
Tucker as a no, nothing elitist. It’s a physical similarity. Chatsworth has Brown Jr. And I named him that when Tucker was hosting CROSSFIRE back on CNN. But I’m not done. I want to address what Chatsworth said. And again, Chatsworth. You can always man up and call me on the phone. I’ll do this for the next ten years. I’ll be right back.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.radio.talk, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa

On Tuesday’s Mark Levin Show, it’s important to hold the isolationists like Chatsworth Qatarlson (Tucker Carlson), Steve Bannon, and Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene accountable. They have undermined President Trump and aided enemies by opposing action against Iran’s nuclear program. They attack Trump despite benefiting from his actions or pardons. They are dangerous liars who seek to undermine Trump’s presidency. These isolationists engage in character assassination rather than legitimate policy disagreement, particularly Qatarlson’s accusation that Trump is complicit in risking World War III. We should ignore their so-called influencers. Also, Iran has been militarily defeated by Israel and had its nuclear program destroyed by U.S. forces under Trump. Despite these setbacks, the enemy persists. Questions remain about whether any ceasefire with a terrorist regime known for decades of violence, deception, and refusal to abandon nuclear ambitions will work. Trump is to be trusted. He wants to win for America and his record is stellar. Let’s see how it goes. Later, New York City Mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa calls in to discuss the NYC Democratic primary, Andrew Cuomo vs Zohran Mamdani, an Islamist. Sliwa warns that Mamdani’s potential victory could lead to a
massive flight from NYC, further draining investment, and businesses. Sliwa
is a solution to restore law and order, urging voters to ‘improve, don’t
move’ by electing him. Later, the “only one missile was fired into Israel” argument wouldn’t fly if only one missile is fired into our country — especially after hundreds of these missiles had already been fired into our country aimed at our cities. Would that be ok with us? Of course not. And
let us reiterate to our enemies, that it would not be ok. Finally, Daniel Flesch, Senior Policy Analyst for Middle East Policy at the Heritage Foundation, calls in and explains that Israel and the U.S. decisively set
back Iran’s nuclear ambitions and military capabilities in days. Israel’s strikes, echoing the 1967 Six Day War, and the U.S.’s precise operation signaled to Iran, Russia, and China a readiness to use swift force to protect interests, strengthening regional dominance and U.S.-Israel ties, though risking Iranian retaliation.

Rough transcription of Hour 1

Segment 1
Hello America. Mark Levin here. Our number 877-381-3811. 877-381-3811.
You’re listening to Radio Free America. But the truth shall set you free, you know. I found online a great. A great short clip from Clarence Thomas. It was put there by the great Ted Cruz. And this is a it’s just a very short clip
from 2007. And in times like this. Well, people are trying to sort out truth from fiction. And facts from propaganda. You need to have the courage to
stand up and speak for yourself. That’s not hard for me. I’ve got multiple platforms for multi-millions of listeners. Marjorie Taylor GREENE. Is
demanding that Fox fire me today. She better hope that they don’t. And of course they won’t. The whole world knows she’s a fool and a buffoon. She’s
the one who famously said. Iran never killed an American. She should be
walking around with a bag over her head for a lot of reasons. But that one in particular. And so I of. I’ve anointed her the dumbest person in the House of Representatives. And that let me tell you something. That’s an achievement. It’s a big achievement. Here’s what Clarence Thomas said at the Heritage Foundation in 2007. Words to the wise. Cut one. Go. You can be in the middle
of a hurricane or you can be on a calm day. North is still north. You could
be in a thunderstorm. North is still north. People can yell at you. North is still north. It doesn’t change fundamental things. And in this business,
right is still right. Even if you stand by yourself. Never forget that. It’s very, very important. Right is still right. Even if you stand by yourself. Right is still right. Of course, I stand with millions of millions of you. I want to talk about what happened today relating to when the president went to the helicopter. I want to talk about the cease fire. And things of that sort. But first, it’s very important that we understand our history, even recent history. Because we don’t learn from it. It’s very important that we understand. The fraudsters are. Who The Grifters are. It’s very important because at a time like this when we are literally facing. Enemy within enemy without whether they be Islamist terrorists. Whether they be Islamist
terrorist groups. Her states, whether it would be Marxist countries. Like
North Korea and China, whether it be fascist regimes. Like Russia under the former colonel in the KGB, Putin. The isolationists either outright support these entities. Or they give them aid and comfort. These are very dangerous times. And with the new media doesn’t take much for basically anybody to have
a platform. And to give aid and comfort to the enemy. I never want you to forget that Donald Trump was contemplating what to do about these nuclear sites. He came under brutal attack. By the isolationists. By Chatsworth,
Qatar. Olsson. By pardon me. Bannon a fraudster. By Marjorie Trader GREENE, a buffoon. And many others. They attacked President Trump. Even though they
have drifted off of him. Even though. Even though pardon me, Bannon got a pardon from him, that wasn’t good enough for Bannon. Even though cats were in Qatar. Olsson. Has had to apologize to our president repeatedly. Because the trust fund baby prep boy. Really is a strange dude. And it goes on. So we’re going to put this in context. Because, again, it’s important. At a time like this, we’re facing enemies, foreign and domestic, that we know who stands
with you? We, the people. The American people. And it sure as hell need them. When 80% or more of the American people wanted something done. About those nuclear sites and Donald Trump did it for which he should get. The Nobel
Peace Prize. Here’s a post. Mark Levin was at the White House today lobbying for a war with Iran. To be clear, Levin has no plans to fight in this or any other war. He’s demanding that American troops do it. Of course, none of that is true. None of it. We need to stop Iran from building nuclear weapons. He
and like minded ideologues in Washington are now arguing they’re just weeks away. If this sounds familiar, it’s because the same people have been making the same claim since at least the 1990s. It’s a lie. In fact, there’s zero credible intelligence that suggests Iran is anywhere near building a bomb or has plans to. None. Anyone who claims otherwise is ignorant or dishonest. All right. President. Vice President. Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense,
the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The CIA director. But let’s put them aside for
now. If the U.S. government knew Iran was weeks from possessing a nuclear weapon, we’d be at war already. Iran knows this, which is why they aren’t building one. You see what I mean? This guy’s Tokyo Rose in many ways, except Tokyo Rose. Actually was part of the anime in Japan. Tehran, Qatar. He’s
right here in the United States in a hovel in Maine or some other place
hiding out. And Rand knows this, which is why they’re not building one. Iran also knows it’s unwise to give up its weapons program entirely. Now, look,
I’m not going to explain again and again the incoherence of this. So it
doesn’t have one, but it knows why it’s unwise to give one up. This is this
is what I mean. It must happen late at night, you know. Happy hour. Moammar Gadhafi tried that and wound up sodomized with a bayonet. As soon as Gadhafi disarm, Naito killed him. Naito never killed him. Many years later, as people killed him. This is what I mean. They hate America. First crowd. Iran’s
leaders saw that happen. They learned the obvious lesson. So why is Mark
Levin once again hyperventilating about weapons of mass destruction? I’m not hyperventilating about anything taking the evidence that’s presented by our government. The Trump administration to distract you from the real goal,
which is regime change. Young Americans heading back to the Middle East to topple yet another government. Virtually no one will say this out loud. America’s record of overthrowing foreign leaders. Look, nobody said it out
loud because it’s a lie. I can’t even count the number of lies I just
mentioned in the first three paragraph. This is important. Accountability is important. Virtually no one will say this out loud. America’s record of overthrowing foreign leaders is so embarrassingly counterproductive that
regime change has become a synonym for disaster. I thought we sent bombers
over there, Mr. Producer, to knock out their nuclear sites. Did we send any troops? Virtually no one supports it. So instead of telling the truth about their motives, they manufacture hysteria. Quote, A country like Iran can
never have the bomb. They’ll nuke Los Angeles. We have to act now. Is a very serious problem with these these sites. Nobody’s denied it except the isolationists. These are damnable, dangerous people. They don’t really mean this. And you can tell they vote by what they admit. At least two of Iran’s neighbors, both Islamic nations, already have nuclear weapons. And I looked
on a map. I see Pakistan. They have a nuclear weapon. Then there’s
Afghanistan. They don’t. I don’t know what he’s talking about, but they’re going in Qatar. Listen, that fact should scare the hell out of Mark. Now,
keep in mind, I never mention this clown. That fact should scare the hell out of Mark Levin. Yet for some reason he never mentions it. How come? Well,
let’s see. Has Pakistan threatened to blow us off the face of the earth? Is Pakistan not an ally? Even an uncomfortable. This guy is a lunatic because
it’s not the weapons he hates. It’s the ideology, the Iranian government. That’s true. I do hate that. The Islamist ideology is the jihadis is
horrible. But apparently, Tucker does not. That’s key. It goes without saying that there are very few Trump voters who’d support a regime change war in
Iran. Donald Trump has arguably has argued loudly against reckless lunacy
like this. Well, where is this coming from? So he doesn’t know what I
discussed with Donald Trump. He got a leak. And I know where it came from,
and I’m going to help protect his sorry ass. Trump ran for president as a
peace candidate. A peace candidate, not a death candidate. Peace does not
mean never using military action. That’s what made him different from conventional Republicans. It’s why he won. Actually, he won more over immigration. But then what it is, is not something that Tucker can escape. A war with Iran would amount to a profound betrayal of his supporters. It would end his presidency. That may explain why so many of Trump’s enemies are advocating for it. It would end his presidency. A war with Iran. What war?
And his presidency was backed by 80% of Republicans. Then there’s the
question of war itself. Iran may not have nukes, but it has a fearsome
arsenal, ballistic missiles, many of which are aimed at U.S. military installations in the Gulf, as well as our allies in a critical energy infrastructure. I don’t believe they fired a single one outside of Israel,
did they, Mr. Producer? Listen to this. The first week of a war with Iran
could easily kill thousands of Americans. It could also collapse our economy
as surging oil prices trigger unimaginable inflation. Consider the effects of $30 gasoline. Oil prices went down. But the second week of the war, it could
be even worse. Iran is in Iraq or Libya or even North Korea, while it’s often described as a rogue state. Iran has powerful allies. It’s now part of a
global bloc called BRICS. That’s an economic association moron, which represents the majority of the world’s landmass population, economy. Brazil
and India, among other countries, belong to it. Iran has extensive military ties with Russia. It serves the overwhelming majority of its oil exports to China. Iran isn’t alone. An attack on Iran could very easily become a world
war and we lose. What do you think, folks? None of these are far fetched prediction, says Kathiresan. Most of them comport with the Pentagon’s own estimates. Now they don’t. Many Americans would die during a war with Iran. People like Mark don’t seem to care about this. It’s not relevant to them. Instead, they insist that Iran give up all uranium enrichment regardless of
its purpose. This guy is really bad news. What was its purpose in those mountains? They required our bunker buster bombs. What were the purpose to
put the lights on in Iran? That’s what he wanted you to believe. They know perfectly well that Iran will never accept that demand. They’ll fight first. And of course, that’s the whole point of pushing for it to box the Trump administration into regime change in Iran. While it doesn’t seem to work,
does it, Mr. Producer? The only two people talking about regime change were
him and the president recently, and he’s dismissed it. One thing that people like Mark Levine don’t want is a peaceful solution to the problem of Iran. Despite the obvious benefits to the United States, they denounce Anyone who advocates for a deal is a traitor and a bigot. They’ll tell us with a
straight face that Long Island native Stephen Metcalf has a secret war of Islamic monarchies. Nobody has said that. They’ll say or do whatever it
takes. They have no limits. These are scary people. Pray that Donald Trump ignores them. Is a man that has not only no judgment, no context, no circumspection. He’s a not. Every single thing he said. There is a lie. Every single one. Every single one. So why did he say it? He put it out publicly.
Why did he say it? Here’s the National Security Journal. Complicit in war. Tucker Carlson Blast Trump over Iran Attack. Tucker Carlson has publicly blasted President Trump over Israel’s recent air assault on Iran, accusing Trump of being complicit in the act of war, quote unquote, due to long
standing U.S. military support for Israel. He also said we should drop
Israel, of course. It’s why I call them Qatar. Listen. In a June 13th newsletter, Carlson argued that America First politicians cannot disavow involvement in the attack. Trump, in a subsequent interview with The
Atlantic, dismissed Carlson’s criticisms, asserting his ownership of the America First slogan and arguing that you can’t have a piece of Iran as a nuclear weapon. And it goes on. Tucker Carlson versus Donald Trump. Tucker Carlson has a long, vile, vicious history of trashing Donald Trump. I’m going to read you one letter when we return. Then I want to get on about cease
fires. What’s going on today? Iran breaking the cease fire. Iran asserting
that they’re going to continue with their nuclear program. The president saying, no, they’re not. And the whole mindset of the Islamist world. We have some great guests as well. We’ll be right back.

Segment 2
And so we’re going to continue to make sure. The truth is out there. It’s
very, very important. I’m going to continue to make sure you know who to hold accountable. For their lies and deceit. Somebody sent me online here. Mr. Producer, did you see the Tehran Times? Now, apparently the Tehran Times. As
I understand it, is the official English language media propaganda operation for the Islamic Revolution in Tehran. And they. Embraced. Supported. Reported every word that I just read to you from. Chatsworth, Qatar. OLSON And spread
it around the world. Because he gave aid and comfort to an enemy that our president and our military took on. I believe these people secretly. The isolationists were very upset at us smooth that that mission went. They’re
very upset that Israel has. Essentially destroyed the Iranian military.
They’re very angry. They’re very thrilled that Khamenei lives, whether he’s
in a bunker, hunkering down or wherever it is. More when I return.

Segment 3
I’ll deal with pardon me Bannon tomorrow because there’s a lot to get to
today but this guy you’ll learn to despise this guy. He’s ripped off you patriotic Americans once too often. He’s confessed to it. But now I’m dealing with the happy hooker politics. He’s had more positions. On issues over his. Very odd career. Then a hooker. Just the truth. Even media points out text messages made public during the Fox News Dominion Voting Systems defamation trial revealed that Carlson had privately celebrated Trump’s loss in the 2020 presidential election. Is okay with you, America. You see what a class-A fool this is and fraud. Writing a message is we are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can’t wait. This is when he was coming
to you over real television. I hate him passionately. Quote unquote, declared Carlson in another message as Trump continued to claim he had rightfully won
a second term. It’s worse than that. But he’s never changed. He’s never changed. That was recent years. This is 1999. When he fancied himself a
liberal slate. Website, which is radical left and he’s writing. He’s writing one of the individuals there, Evan And this is. Chatsworth, Qatar, also. I’d love to add something even meaner to your description of Donald Trump. He’s
the sort of person I want to keep kicking once he’s down. But I don’t think I can. You said it all. He is the single most repulsive person on the planet. What a wonderfully pithy, accurate sentence. Congratulations. That said, I still plan to write about him some time. I don’t think I’ll be able to help
it. Horrible as he is. Or perhaps because he is horrible. Trump is
interesting, or at least more so than most candidates. Michael Lewis took a
lot of crap from more serious minded political reporters in 1996 for devoting so much ink to Maury Taylor, the drunk and tire salesman from Michigan, who made a brief self-financed run for the Republican nomination. The idea was Maury Taylor is irrelevant. Why waste readers time writing about him? One
part of me agrees. Maury Taylor barely rose in the level of Sideshow, and there’s no reason to feed the ego of every rich guy who decides to inflict midlife crises on American voters. That sober, responsible part of me
speaking the much larger part, the part that now once wrote a piece that
about Monica Lewinsky sex therapist feels differently, for one thing.
Following Trump around would be amusing as hell. I plan to start the
interview with sneezing repeatedly into my palm, then trying to shake his
hand. Guaranteed. Laid right there. I can. I can already see it in print. Donald Trump is afraid of cooties. For another, Trump’s candidacy and the Reform Party generally reflects a larger, important trend in politics. And maybe the sure sign yet that ideology is a force in national elections is
dead. Well, did I just write that last sentence? Pardon me? Let me take that back. The Reform Party isn’t a reflection of anything. There’s just a bunch
of wackos with a website and federal matching funds. But that doesn’t mean we can’t have a good time covering them. Now that I’ve revealed myself as essentially shallow and self-interested. Let’s talk about Drudge. And of course, he goes on to trash Drudge. Who deserves it today, that’s for sure.
But this is when Drudge was sober or actually on the site. Nobody ever knows because he’s the Howard Hughes these days of secrecy, but without the money. And he goes on. Nothing but dripping contempt for Trump. So that’s 1999. What
I read you from the texts is just a little bit ago, and there’s everything in between. And here we are facing the Islamo Nazi regime in Iran. And what does this clown do? He accuses Trump of starting complicit in starting World War Three. And after the great American military does what it does, he praises Qatar. Qatar. Sick. And I found another great clip of Christopher Hitchens on Real Time with Bill Maher in 2005. Relating to the mindset. Of the jihadi Islamists. And Christopher Hitchens sometimes was really great. Right on. And sometimes he was really awful, but he had integrity, whether you agree with them or not. Something. Qatar Olsen. Pardon me. Bannon do not have. None of them have. They have no integrity whatsoever. They have lied to you. They
want to separate you from your money. They are grifters. And they say the
most outlandish things. And when people, people realize it. They get together almost like piranha. Now, better yet, cockroaches. Okay. Here’s Christopher Hitchens. Again 20 years ago. Had to go in 1788 when the United States was barely a country. Right. It was having its sailors taken as slaves by the Barbary states, the states of the Ottoman Empire, North Africa, Tripoli, Tripoli, shores of Tripoli, those in Tripoli and its people. As ships
stopped, its crews carried off into slavery. We estimate one and a half
million European and American slaves taken between 1750 and 1815. Jefferson
and Adams went to their ambassador in London and said, Why do you do this to us? The United States has never had a quarrel with the Muslim world of any kind. We weren’t in the Crusades. We weren’t in the war in Spain. Why do you
do this to our people in our ships while you plunder and enslave people in?
The ambassador said very plainly, Mr. Abdel Rahman said, Because the Koran gives us permission to do so because you are infidels. And that’s our answer. And Jefferson said, Well, in that case, I will send a Navy which will crush your state, which he did and a good thing. But to the Islamic fundamentalism
is not created by American democracy. It’s a lie to say so. It’s a
masochistic lie. And it excuses those who are the real criminals. And it
blames us for the attacks made, of course. And that’s what we hear today from the isolationists. The isolations are celebrating a great victory. In taking out Iran’s nuclear sites. They were hoping for something less. Failure, especially. So they could they can continue on with whatever it is that they do. And then attack the president who they said was complicit. And of course, you, the American people, patriots who wanted our military succeed. They’re
not celebrating this victory. In addition, they trash the people of Israel. Majority Jewish, but not all Jewish. Who really defeated the Iranian military in today’s. And after 12 days, the Iranian military backchannel apparently to the president asking him, please. Please find a way for us to get out of
this. They’ve been wrong about everything, but their anti-Semitism grows,
their anti-Americanism grows. Very dangerous group. And the more they post things and the more they host each other. This is the incestuous. They host each other and talk about others among themselves. All for everyone to see. This is very important. They identify themselves. The self-identified. America’s governor. Ron DeSantis is a fantastic man. He’s done a fantastic
job as governor, was a fantastic congressman, no great interventionist. Here. He was at a press conference yesterday. Cut three ago. President Trump, from the time he came down the escalator in 2015 to the president, has been very consistent. It’s also been correct that the policy of the United States is
that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. And the reason why they can’t have a nuclear weapon is, one, we just we don’t want to see nuclear proliferation generally. But two, no country has been more hostile to the United States of America since 1979 than the Iranian mullahs have been. And that started with the hostage crisis in 79 and 80. It’s it continued with the bombing of the Marine Corps Barretts in Beirut, Lebanon, in 1983 that killed over 240
service members. You also saw it at the bombing of the Khobar Towers in 1996. And then when I was serving in Iraq as a junior officer, the majority of the casualties, both killed in action and wounded in action at that time in the conflict. 27 in the 2008 were at the hands of Iranian backed Shia militia. So they are responsible for maiming thousands of American service members and probably killing over a thousand U.S. service members. The terrorism you see
in the Middle East, whether it’s Houthis, whether it’s Hezbollah, whether
it’s Hamas, that is all because of Iran. Iran funds terrorism around the
world and they’re the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. Third.
Iran’s ideology since 1979 and their ruling class with the Ayatollah and his and his other clerics. We rely on mutually assured destruction to ensure that someone’s not going to launch a nuclear attack. I mean, during the Cold War, Soviets had enough nuclear missiles to wipe America off the map. We had more than enough to wipe them off the map. They knew if they fired one at us, we’d fire back and then we’d both end up going in a cloud of smoke. So that
deterred because it just wasn’t worth doing. You know, the problem with with Iran is these are militant Shia Islamists. And so they have a very
apocalyptic, radical ideology. So mutually assured destruction for them, if they fire at Israel and knowing Israel will fire back and do immense damage
or the United States, I don’t know if they could reach the United States yet, but if they did that now, because they do consider us the Great Satan, they know that would be a lot of damage, but that may not be a deterrent for them. That may be an inducement to them. That may be furthering what they want to
do. So I think I think people recognize that them being able to acquire a nuclear weapon would be a unique challenge, not just for the region, but but throughout the world. And, you know, no one’s really been been willing to to fully do anything about it. And I think President Trump showed decisiveness
to be able to act when he did. Now people say, well, what are they going to
do to respond? And they may. Right. I don’t think they had they can respond effectively, conventionally against U.S. forces. They just don’t have the ability. But that’s not typically how they operate. They operate through
these proxy groups, through these militia groups, through Hezbollah, through all this stuff. Who knows who they sent across the southern border during Biden’s administration? We don’t know. But I just think it’s important to
point out they’ve been waging conflict against the United States since 1979. They’ve really just been limited by their means. If they had more means, they would have done more. So I don’t know that it’s going to radically change certainly their capability, but their posture was hostile before this. And obviously, you know, it will be hostile since then. Just ask yourselves who sounds more intelligent, knowledgeable, rational. Ron DeSantis. Christopher Hitchens My articulation of that situation. Or this rabble. And look how fast they turned against our commander in chief, in our military. Look how fast
they turned on the president of the United States in the United States Armed Forces. Look how fast they did it in defense of an Islamist Nazi regime that has slaughtered Americans and other people. Look how fast they pull out the anti-Semitism card and trashed Netanyahu. One of pardon me. Biden’s favorite things now is to trash Netanyahu. But he’s not alone. Bernie Sanders, Talib Omar. And I want you to think also. Don’t these clowns, these isolationists sound like the same clowns on the marches Islamists left? Don’t they sound
like Bernie Sanders? Don’t they sound like Talib? Don’t they sound like AOC
and Omar? They absolutely do. They absolutely do, because you have here a fusion. Of radical isolationists, whether they be on the radical left or whether they be on the fascistic right. Should the Marxist and the fascists, isolationists or both and anti-American. Now the other side happily wraps themselves in the Palestinian flag, in the Hamas flag, in the Islamic Jihad flag, any flag but the American flag that needs to be burned. What makes
what’s made Qatar Olsson and his ilk? More contemptible. As they try to wrap themselves in the American flag while they trash our president and our military. And look, I’m not talking about having an opinion that may disagree with this president or any president. I’m not talking about having a policy difference with this president or any president. And so when Qatar Carlson
says that Trump is complicit in what’s coming, World War Three. That’s not having an opinion. That is an effort to character assassinate the president
of the United States and undermine and usurp his power. If you were to say something like, I don’t agree with the president, this is not something I
would do, and then lay out the position that’s different. But that’s not what they do. That’s not what they do on. These these heel steppers, these heel clickers. It’s always the same thing. They’re thugs. And so they attacked the president. And I’m sure, hey, look, I’m going to be watching very carefully. Carefully. As the Republican primary for the 2028 presidential election
begins to form. And these candidates are going to have to take a side either with America or with the Islamists. It’s that simple. If you’re for the Islamists, well, make sure you don’t have a snowball’s chance in the hell.
And so we’ll keep an eye on Qatar, Altan and his ilk. Only because we have
to, but as rarely as possible to see who they endorse. Because it’s likely whoever they endorse, we will fight like hell and oppose. We want a Trump
like candidate. We want a Reagan like candidate. We want a commander in chief who will defend America. Not sell us out. I’ll be right back.

Segment 4
This isn’t about sniping. This isn’t about any of that. This is a battle for the heart of the country. It’s a difference between fake MAGA, fake conservatives, fake patriots and you. We the people. It was about sniping. I wouldn’t be involved because I don’t care. And you may recall, I really
rarely ever mentioned any of these people, even though I knew they were reprobates. But there’s a time and place for everything. And at some point.
You got to stand up and be counted. And when I talk to people, go to my local diner here for breakfast. Sometimes I go to the barber shop or wherever. I
find America despises. The Islamist regime in Iran is thrilled with President Trump’s actions and our military. Almost none of them know about Qatar. ELSON Or pardon me. Bannon Or any of these people. There are few who do despise
them because they took the side of the enemy and they’re always going to take the side of the enemy. Always. When we return, a cease fire. We’ll raise some of the issues we raised the other day and we’ll see if they were worth
raising, number one. Number two. There are cease fires and there are cease fires and there are presidents and there are presidents. Under this
president, a ceasefire is much different than other under other presidents,
is it not? We’ll have that discussion. We also have a great guest showing up. There’s a big primary taking place in New York tomorrow. And there’s there’s
an Islamist who may get the Democratic nomination.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)