WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on May 20 sided with a lawmaker from
Maine who was barred from voting until she apologized for a
controversial Facebook post about a transgender athlete.
Maine state Rep. Laurel Libby in February made a post criticizing the
fact that a transgender high school athlete was allowed to compete in
– and win - a pole vaulting competition.
Libby's posts on Facebook and X went viral, putting Maine’s policy in
the spotlight and, according to a majority of her colleagues,
endangering the athlete.
They barred her from voting until she apologizes.
The Supreme Court said she can vote while she challenges her
punishment as unconstitutional. Libby argues that her First Amendment
right to free speech is being violated and her constituents are being disenfranchised.
Two of the court's three liberal justices - Sonia Sotomayor and
Ketanji Brown Jackson - dissented.
Jackson said the court has watered down its standard for granting
emergency relief, which she called an "unfortunate development."
The majority, she wrote, has opted to “dole out error correction as it
sees fit, regardless of the lack of any exigency, and even when the applicants’ claims raise significant legal issues that warrant
thorough evaluation by the lower courts that are dutifully considering
them.”
The majority gave no explanation for its decision, as is common in
responses to emergency requests.
Their decision is the latest chapter in a dispute that drew the
attention of the Trump administration, which has sued Maine for
refusing to ban transgender athletes from participating in women's and
girls' sports.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/05/20/supreme-court-t
ra nsgender-athlete-facebook-post-case/83581119007/
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 498 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 43:26:36 |
Calls: | 9,799 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,752 |
Messages: | 6,189,715 |