Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1 @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competingMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)except they allow sports governing bodies to decide
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion-no >>>>>>>>> ndi scr imination
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is not >>>>>>>> an advantage. eg. target shooting
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:no
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion-
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competingMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is not >>>>>>>>> an advantage. eg. target shooting
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion-
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are for learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competingMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is not >>>>>>>>>> an advantage. eg. target shooting
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion-
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are for >learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competingMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is not >>>>>>>>>> an advantage. eg. target shooting
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
On 5/25/2025 10:59 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Baxter wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071For men to learn they're not women.
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion-
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are for >>> learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>> against menMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is not >>>>>>>>>>>> an advantage. eg. target shooting
 Ã‚ Â Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
    Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
     There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
;
By what means?
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competingMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)except they allow sports governing bodies to decide
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion-no >>>>>>>>>> ndi scr imination
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is not >>>>>>>>> an advantage. eg. target shooting
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
Baxter wrote:inclusion-
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-
notno
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is
forWhere is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college aremaybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competingMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
learning.
For men to learn they're not women.
On 24/5/25 21:08, Norman wrote:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competingMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)except they allow sports governing bodies to decide
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion-no >>>>>>>>>>> ndi scr imination
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is not >>>>>>>>>> an advantage. eg. target shooting
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
Is it fair for women with genes for long bones to compete against
short bone women?
On 5/25/2025 10:59 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Baxter wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071For men to learn they're not women.
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion-
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are for >>> learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>> against menMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is not >>>>>>>>>>>> an advantage. eg. target shooting
 Ã‚ Â Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
    Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
     There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
By what means? Brainwashing? The scientific evidence is that brains
(hence, minds) can be gendered:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_sex_differences
Once again, you, as a human being, cannot "fake" any postmortem exams
that are conducted on your remains. If you doubt this, you are, of
course, welcome to try doing so!
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:inclusion-
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-
notno
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are for >>learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competingMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics, either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
On 24/5/25 21:08, Norman wrote:no
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion-
notndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competingMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
Is it fair for women with genes for long bones to compete against
short bone women?
On 24/5/25 21:08, Norman wrote:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competingMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)except they allow sports governing bodies to decide
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion-no >>>>>>>>>>> ndi scr imination
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is not >>>>>>>>>> an advantage. eg. target shooting
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
Is it fair for women with genes for long bones to compete against
short bone women?
On 25/5/25 9:51, LeftistDon'tMatter wrote:
Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
Make pro sports do their own training leagues.
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 5/25/2025 10:59 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Baxter wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071For men to learn they're not women.
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school andmaybe some women would feel a degree of intimidationMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior
physicality is not
an advantage. eg. target shooting
 Ã‚ Â Why they have women's chess matches >>>>>>>>>>> and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
competing
against men
    Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
     There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
college are for
learning.
;
By what means?
By not being a panty wearing sissy faggot, of course.
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@jkone.not> wrote in news:1842d06c47d63af1$70$67230 $2add206e@news.thecubenet.com:
Baxter wrote:inclusion-
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-
notno
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is
For men to learn they're not women.Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college aremaybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>> against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
for learning.
Too many men think they're entitled to women's bodies - regardless of
what the women want.
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxterinclusion-
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-
notno
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the rulesWhere is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college aremaybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>> against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
for learning.
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics, either.
Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
for others.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have more
girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that trans inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxterinclusion-
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-
notno
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are for >>>learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>> against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics, either.
Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the rules
for others.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have more
girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that trans >inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
On 25 May 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some news:100vt45$1hud4$6@dont-email.me:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@jkone.not> wrote in
news:1842d06c47d63af1$70$67230 $2add206e@news.thecubenet.com:
Baxter wrote:inclusion-
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-
notno
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
For men to learn they're not women.Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college aremaybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>>> against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have >>>>>>>>>>> women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
for learning.
Too many men think they're entitled to women's bodies - regardless of
what the women want.
That's why "trannys" are pretending to be women and encroaching on
spaces long established for women only.
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxterinclusion-
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-
notno
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college aremaybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>>> against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
for learning.
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the rules
for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have more >>girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that trans >>inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
On 25 May 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some news:100vui1$1hud4$11@dont-email.me:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxterinclusion-
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-
notno
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the rulesWhere is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college aremaybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>>> against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
for learning.
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics, either.
Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
for others.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have more
girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that trans
inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
That's a totally horseshit claim. Larger metro areas will of course
have more because schools are larger. Stacking the deck with baseless numbers isn't going to make your case.
fat fani willis <customerservice@fultoncountyga.gov> wrote in news:20250526.012550.8d496848@msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
On 25 May 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted someNope, you dope.
news:100vt45$1hud4$6@dont-email.me:
Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@jkone.not> wrote in
news:1842d06c47d63af1$70$67230 $2add206e@news.thecubenet.com:
Baxter wrote:inclusion-
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-
notno
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
For men to learn they're not women.Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college aremaybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>>>> against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have >>>>>>>>>>>> women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
for learning.
Too many men think they're entitled to women's bodies - regardless of
what the women want.
That's why "trannys" are pretending to be women and encroaching on
spaces long established for women only.
If what you say is true, explain this: https://www.metroweekly.com/2023/07/transgender-male-boxer-goes-3-0- against-male-opponents/
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxternot
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are >>>>>for learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>>>> against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the rules >>>for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to
follow them.
Education.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have more >>>girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that trans >>>inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Rudy Canoza wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 5/25/2025 10:59 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:By not being a panty wearing sissy faggot, of course.
Baxter wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071For men to learn they're not women.
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are >>>>> formaybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>>>> against menMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not
an advantage. eg. target shooting
 Ã‚ Â Why they have women's chess matches >>>>>>>>>>>> and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
    Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
     There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
learning.
;
By what means?
;
;
LOL! if they already wearing panties, then i dont think education will
make a difference.
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxterinclusion-
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1 >>>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-
notno
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are >>>>>> for learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>>>>> against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches >>>>>>>>>>>>> and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders >>>>>>> cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the rules >>>> for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to
follow them.
Education.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have more >>>> girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that trans >>>> inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter ><bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxternot
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1 >>>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are >>>>>>for learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competing >>>>>>>>>>> against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders >>>>>>> cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the rules >>>>for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to
follow them.
Education.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have more >>>>girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that trans >>>>inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:competing
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxternot
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1 >>>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidationMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
rulesWhere is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are >>>>>>for learning.against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders >>>>>>> cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the
morefor others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to
follow them.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have
transgirls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that
Education.inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
On Mon, 26 May 2025 02:54:26 -0400, LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >><bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxternot
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1 >>>>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior
physicality is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college >>>>>>>are for learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidationMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
competing against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
pretenders cheating against normal women is your idea of
fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the >>>>>rules for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to >>>follow them.
Education.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have >>>>>more girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims
that trans inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and
baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
https://fpiw.org/gallup-poll-shows-americans-dont-want-men-in-womens-sp
orts/
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_b6537968-dff2-11ef-b27 4-9fbf7250bf7f.html
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/nyt-poll-finds-almost-80-of-a mericans-oppose-men-in-womens-sports/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/most-americans-oppose-allowing-men-in -womens-sports-trans-ing-kids-poll/ar-AA1xKdCY
jojo wrote:
Rudy Canoza wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 5/25/2025 10:59 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:By not being a panty wearing sissy faggot, of course.
Baxter wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote inFor men to learn they're not women.
news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071
@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school andmaybe some women would feel a degree of intimidationMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior
physicality is not
an advantage. eg. target shooting
 Ã‚ Â Why they have women's chess matches >>>>>>>>>>>>> and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
competing
against men
    Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
     There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
college are for
learning.
;
By what means?
;
;
LOL! if they already wearing panties, then i dont think
education will make a difference.
Dawn wears boxers and chews tobacco.
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >news:1s383kle1bos6n5ophsrgta1ntl3dlk8q9@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxtercompeting
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxternot
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1 >>>>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidationMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
rulesWhere is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are >>>>>>>for learning.against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders >>>>>>>> cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the
morefor others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to >>>follow them.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have
transgirls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that
Education.inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
Their education is lacking - they're NOT learning that trannies are
people too.
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >news:q8b83k19v2bilhd1etokron7q75oge1p85@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 02:54:26 -0400, LeftistDon'tMatter
<IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>><bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxternot
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:no
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1 >>>>>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physicality is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college >>>>>>>>are for learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation >>>>>>>>>>>>> competing against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
pretenders cheating against normal women is your idea of
fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the >>>>>>rules for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to >>>>follow them.
Education.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have >>>>>>more girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims >>>>>>that trans inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and >>>>>>baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
https://fpiw.org/gallup-poll-shows-americans-dont-want-men-in-womens-sp
orts/
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_b6537968-dff2-11ef-b27
4-9fbf7250bf7f.html
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/nyt-poll-finds-almost-80-of-a
mericans-oppose-men-in-womens-sports/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/most-americans-oppose-allowing-men-in
-womens-sports-trans-ing-kids-poll/ar-AA1xKdCY
===============
Fact Sheet: Transgender Participation in Sports
https://glaad.org/fact-sheet-for-reporters-transgender-participation-in- >sports/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=16386509738 >&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIu_by4Li_jQMVNymtBh1-_yNTEAMYAiAAEgJmSfD_BwE
===========
Anti-suffragism was a political movement composed of both men and women
that began in the late 19th century in order to campaign against women's >suffrage in countries such as Australia, Canada, Ireland, the United
Kingdom and the United States. To some extent, Anti-suffragism was a >Classical Conservative movement that sought to keep the status quo for
women. More American women organized against their own right to vote than
in favor of it, until 1916.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-suffragism
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in news:1s383kle1bos6n5ophsrgta1ntl3dlk8q9@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxtercompeting
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxternot
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1 >>>>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidationMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
rulesWhere is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college are >>>>>>>for learning.against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders >>>>>>>> cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the
morefor others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to >>>follow them.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have
transgirls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that
Education.inclusion harms girls' sports are inaccurate and baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
Their education is lacking - they're NOT learning that trannies are
people too.
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in news:q8b83k19v2bilhd1etokron7q75oge1p85@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 02:54:26 -0400, LeftistDon'tMatter
<IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>><bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxternot
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:no
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m76purFc1euU1 @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physicality is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college >>>>>>>>are for learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation >>>>>>>>>>>>> competing against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
pretenders cheating against normal women is your idea of
fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the >>>>>>rules for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to >>>>follow them.
Education.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have >>>>>>more girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims >>>>>>that trans inclusion harms girls' sports are inaccurate and >>>>>>baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
https://fpiw.org/gallup-poll-shows-americans-dont-want-men-in-womens-s
p orts/
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_b6537968-dff2-11ef-b2
7 4-9fbf7250bf7f.html
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/nyt-poll-finds-almost-80-of-
a mericans-oppose-men-in-womens-sports/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/most-americans-oppose-allowing-men-i
n -womens-sports-trans-ing-kids-poll/ar-AA1xKdCY
===============
Fact Sheet: Transgender Participation in Sports
https://glaad.org/fact-sheet-for-reporters-transgender-participation-in
- sports/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=16386509738 &gclid=EAIaIQobChMIu_by4Li_jQMVNymtBh1-_yNTEAMYAiAAEgJmSfD_BwE
===========
Anti-suffragism was a political movement composed of both men and
women that began in the late 19th century
On 26 May 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some news:1011vi4$22522$4@dont-email.me:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:q8b83k19v2bilhd1etokron7q75oge1p85@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 02:54:26 -0400, LeftistDon'tMatter
<IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxterinclusion-
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>>>>> @fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m76purFc1euU1 @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-
notno
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physicality is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college >>>>>>>>> are for learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> competing against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
pretenders cheating against normal women is your idea of
fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance. >>>>>>>>
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the >>>>>>> rules for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to
follow them.
Education.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have >>>>>>> more girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims >>>>>>> that trans inclusion harms girls' sports are inaccurate and
baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
https://fpiw.org/gallup-poll-shows-americans-dont-want-men-in-womens-s
p orts/
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_b6537968-dff2-11ef-b2
7 4-9fbf7250bf7f.html
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/nyt-poll-finds-almost-80-of-
a mericans-oppose-men-in-womens-sports/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/most-americans-oppose-allowing-men-i
n -womens-sports-trans-ing-kids-poll/ar-AA1xKdCY
===============
Fact Sheet: Transgender Participation in Sports
https://glaad.org/fact-sheet-for-reporters-transgender-participation-in
- sports/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=16386509738
&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIu_by4Li_jQMVNymtBh1-_yNTEAMYAiAAEgJmSfD_BwE
===========
Anti-suffragism was a political movement composed of both men and
women that began in the late 19th century
Transgenderism is a mental health issue exacerbated by social media and
weak parents.
On 5/26/2025 2:34 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
jojo wrote:
Rudy Canoza wrote:Dawn wears boxers and chews tobacco.
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 5/25/2025 10:59 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >
Baxter wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>>> @fucne.rs: >
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted someno
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1 >>>>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inclusion-
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college >>>>>>> are formaybe some women would feel a degree of intimidationMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior
physicality is not
an advantage. eg. target shooting
 Ã‚ Â Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
competing against men
    Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
     There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
pretenders cheating against normal women is your idea of
fairness?
learning.
For men to learn they're not women.
By what means?
 >
By not being a panty wearing sissy faggot, of course.
LOL! if they already wearing panties, then i dont think education
will make a difference.
That's gross.
On Mon, 26 May 2025 11:49:31 -0400, LeftistDon'tMatter
<IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:53:09 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >><bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:<snip>
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
Their education is lacking - they're NOT learning that trannies are >>>people too.
Nobody denies that they're people, they're freaky people.
Conservatives and liberals may be talking past each other here.
Several recent studies have found that conservatives are more easily disgusted by things than liberals are. So if we accept that trannies
are disgusting in some sense, it's not surprising that conservatives
react more negatively to them than liberals (e.g., by treating them
harshly and wishing ill on them).
So if we accept that trannies
are disgusting in some sense
Transgenderism is a mental health issue exacerbated by social media and
weak parents.
On 26/5/25 11:03, Vincent Maycock wrote:
So if we accept that trannies
are disgusting in some sense
Rejected.
On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:53:09 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:physicality
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:1s383kle1bos6n5ophsrgta1ntl3dlk8q9@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:no
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1 >>>>>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior
pretenderscompetingnotis
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidationMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
arecheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college
rulesfor learning.
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the
morefor others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to >>>>follow them.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have
transgirls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that
Education.inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
Their education is lacking - they're NOT learning that trannies are
people too.
Nobody denies that they're people, they're freaky people.
On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:58:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:q8b83k19v2bilhd1etokron7q75oge1p85@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 02:54:26 -0400, LeftistDon'tMatter
<IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>><bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxternot
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 @fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:no
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m76purFc1euU1 @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physicality is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college >>>>>>>>>are for learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> competing against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
pretenders cheating against normal women is your idea of
fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance. >>>>>>>>
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the >>>>>>>rules for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to >>>>>follow them.
Education.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have >>>>>>>more girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims >>>>>>>that trans inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and >>>>>>>baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans" >>>>fruitcakes are getting rejected.
https://fpiw.org/gallup-poll-shows-americans-dont-want-men-in-womens-
sp orts/
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_b6537968-dff2-11ef-b
27 4-9fbf7250bf7f.html
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/nyt-poll-finds-almost-80-of
-a mericans-oppose-men-in-womens-sports/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/most-americans-oppose-allowing-men-
in -womens-sports-trans-ing-kids-poll/ar-AA1xKdCY
===============
Fact Sheet: Transgender Participation in Sports
https://glaad.org/fact-sheet-for-reporters-transgender-participation-in
- sports/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=16386509738 >>&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIu_by4Li_jQMVNymtBh1-_yNTEAMYAiAAEgJmSfD_BwE
===========
Anti-suffragism was a political movement composed of both men and
women that began in the late 19th century in order to campaign against >>women's suffrage in countries such as Australia, Canada, Ireland, the >>United Kingdom and the United States. To some extent, Anti-suffragism
was a Classical Conservative movement that sought to keep the status
quo for women. More American women organized against their own right
to vote than in favor of it, until 1916.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-suffragism
Glaad is a freaky media that talks about freaky people. I'm not
interested in their propaganda.
On 26 May 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some news:1011v8l$22522$2@dont-email.me:physicality
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:1s383kle1bos6n5ophsrgta1ntl3dlk8q9@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:no
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1 >>>>>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior
pretenderscompetingnotis
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidationMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
arecheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college
rulesfor learning.
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the
morefor others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to >>>>follow them.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have
transgirls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that
Education.inclusion harms girls' sports are inaccurate and baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
Their education is lacking - they're NOT learning that trannies are
people too.
Sick people, from sick families, encouraged by sick teachers.
On 26 May 2025, Vincent Maycock <maycock@gmail.com> posted some news:r1b93k5hhkkai8ftjq63tsd1f6fok1bhki@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 11:49:31 -0400, LeftistDon'tMatter >><IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:53:09 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>><bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:<snip>
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
Their education is lacking - they're NOT learning that trannies are >>>>people too.
Nobody denies that they're people, they're freaky people.
Conservatives and liberals may be talking past each other here.
Several recent studies have found that conservatives are more easily
disgusted by things than liberals are. So if we accept that trannies
are disgusting in some sense, it's not surprising that conservatives
react more negatively to them than liberals (e.g., by treating them
harshly and wishing ill on them).
Trannies wind up homeless while shitting all over the sidewalks and
public spaces. That's disgusting, yet liberals say it's okay and
there is nothing wrong with them.
Siri Cruz wrote:
On 26/5/25 11:03, Vincent Maycock wrote:
So if we accept that trannies
are disgusting in some sense
Rejected.
Bull dyke says what?!
On Mon, 26 May 2025 12:28:35 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 26/5/25 11:03, Vincent Maycock wrote:
So if we accept that trannies
are disgusting in some sense
Rejected.
So you don't mind the way they look, with their huge amount of makeup
and bizarre fusion of traditional gender appearances?
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in news:g8393k5a40ksrv29108khmo81q6elu00mo@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:53:09 -0000 (UTC), Baxterphysicality
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:1s383kle1bos6n5ophsrgta1ntl3dlk8q9@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in >>>>>>>>>news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 @fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:no
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m76purFc1euU1 @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior
pretendersnotis
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation >>>competingMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
arecheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college
for learning.
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance. >>>>>>>>
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the >>>rules
for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to >>>>>follow them.
Education.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have >>>more
girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that >>>trans
inclusion harms girls' sports are inaccurate and baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
Their education is lacking - they're NOT learning that trannies are >>>people too.
Nobody denies that they're people, they're freaky people.
But you think you're better than them - just like the slaveowners
thought they were better than those Black slaves.
Gregor <gf@pan.nit> wrote in news:965fecde58.1748286616@vupzt.wu:
On 26 May 2025, Vincent Maycock <maycock@gmail.com> posted someConservaturds love making up lies.
news:r1b93k5hhkkai8ftjq63tsd1f6fok1bhki@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 11:49:31 -0400, LeftistDon'tMatter >>><IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:53:09 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>><bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:<snip>
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
Their education is lacking - they're NOT learning that trannies are >>>>>people too.
Nobody denies that they're people, they're freaky people.
Conservatives and liberals may be talking past each other here.
Several recent studies have found that conservatives are more easily
disgusted by things than liberals are. So if we accept that trannies
are disgusting in some sense, it's not surprising that conservatives
react more negatively to them than liberals (e.g., by treating them
harshly and wishing ill on them).
Trannies wind up homeless while shitting all over the sidewalks and
public spaces. That's disgusting, yet liberals say it's okay and
there is nothing wrong with them.
On Mon, 26 May 2025 12:28:35 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 26/5/25 11:03, Vincent Maycock wrote:
So if we accept that trannies
are disgusting in some sense
Rejected.
So you don't mind the way they look, with their huge amount of makeup
and bizarre fusion of traditional gender appearances?
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >news:g8393k5a40ksrv29108khmo81q6elu00mo@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:53:09 -0000 (UTC), Baxterphysicality
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:1s383kle1bos6n5ophsrgta1ntl3dlk8q9@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 >>>>>>>>>@fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:no
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1 >>>>>>>>>>> @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior
pretendersnotis
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation >>>competingMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
arecheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college
for learning.
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics,
either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance. >>>>>>>>
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the >>>rules
for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to >>>>>follow them.
Education.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have >>>more
girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that >>>trans
inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
Their education is lacking - they're NOT learning that trannies are >>>people too.
Nobody denies that they're people, they're freaky people.
But you think you're better than them - just like the slaveowners thought >they were better than those Black slaves.
San Francisco.
On Mon, 26 May 2025 12:28:35 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 26/5/25 11:03, Vincent Maycock wrote:
So if we accept that trannies
are disgusting in some sense
Rejected.
I accept it because it's a fact. Just because *you* don't find
something abhorrent in transexualism doesn't mean *nobody* does.
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >news:rf393kdecu6le48efihhjk7pbtqf5o32j0@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:58:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>news:q8b83k19v2bilhd1etokron7q75oge1p85@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 02:54:26 -0400, LeftistDon'tMatter
<IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter >>>>><bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxternot
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 @fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some >>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:no
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m76purFc1euU1 @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physicality is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and college >>>>>>>>>>are for learning.maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> competing against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
pretenders cheating against normal women is your idea of >>>>>>>>>>> fairness?
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics, >>>>>>>>> either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic performance. >>>>>>>>>
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the >>>>>>>>rules for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has to >>>>>>follow them.
Education.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have >>>>>>>>more girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims >>>>>>>>that trans inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and >>>>>>>>baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans" >>>>>fruitcakes are getting rejected.
https://fpiw.org/gallup-poll-shows-americans-dont-want-men-in-womens-
sp orts/
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_b6537968-dff2-11ef-b
27 4-9fbf7250bf7f.html
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/nyt-poll-finds-almost-80-of
-a mericans-oppose-men-in-womens-sports/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/most-americans-oppose-allowing-men-
in -womens-sports-trans-ing-kids-poll/ar-AA1xKdCY
===============
Fact Sheet: Transgender Participation in Sports
https://glaad.org/fact-sheet-for-reporters-transgender-participation-in
- sports/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=16386509738 >>>&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIu_by4Li_jQMVNymtBh1-_yNTEAMYAiAAEgJmSfD_BwE
===========
Anti-suffragism was a political movement composed of both men and
women that began in the late 19th century in order to campaign against >>>women's suffrage in countries such as Australia, Canada, Ireland, the >>>United Kingdom and the United States. To some extent, Anti-suffragism
was a Classical Conservative movement that sought to keep the status
quo for women. More American women organized against their own right
to vote than in favor of it, until 1916.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-suffragism
Glaad is a freaky media that talks about freaky people. I'm not
interested in their propaganda.
You hate education, you hate truth.
Nearly 40% of the Southern slave owners were black at the start of the
On Mon, 26 May 2025 18:17:07 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 13:13:16 -0700, Vincent Maycock
<maycock@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 12:28:35 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 26/5/25 11:03, Vincent Maycock wrote:
So if we accept that trannies
are disgusting in some sense
Rejected.
So you don't mind the way they look, with their huge amount of makeup
and bizarre fusion of traditional gender appearances?
I don't mind the look. Drag hasn't been about female impersonation in
decades. It's an art form and no more ridiculous than the makeup
Elizabeth Taylor wore in 'Cleopatra'.
Do you really find them to be beautiful?
Exhibit 1
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnFgZnVlUeE>
Bonus points. Which ones are transvestites and which ones are
transexuals?
We would probably have to ask them. They look the same to me.
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter wrote:
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have more >>girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that trans >>inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
You want to cite this alleged 'fact'?
On Mon, 26 May 2025 20:54:39 -0000 (UTC), Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>news:g8393k5a40ksrv29108khmo81q6elu00mo@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:53:09 -0000 (UTC), Baxterphysicality
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>news:1s383kle1bos6n5ophsrgta1ntl3dlk8q9@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 @fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted >>>>>>>>>>> some news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:no
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m76purFc1euU1 @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>>>>inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior
pretendersnotis
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation >>>>competingMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender
arecheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school and >>>>>>>>>>college
morefor learning.
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics, >>>>>>>>> either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic
performance.
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the >>>>rules
for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has
to follow them.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation >>>>>>>>have
Education.girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that >>>>trans
inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
Their education is lacking - they're NOT learning that trannies are >>>>people too.
Nobody denies that they're people, they're freaky people.
But you think you're better than them - just like the slaveowners
thought they were better than those Black slaves.
Not necessarily better, just not loony
On Sun, 25 May 2025 11:44:44 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 24/5/25 21:08, Norman wrote:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competingMe, too!Bingo! (No pun intended.)except they allow sports governing bodies to decide
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion-no >>>>>>>>>>>> ndi scr imination
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is not >>>>>>>>>>> an advantage. eg. target shooting
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
Is it fair for women with genes for long bones to compete against
short bone women?
Sports are already dominated by the long boned.
I heard that Michael Phelps has extremely long bone.
On 26/5/25 14:12, hpotter wrote:
Nearly 40% of the Southern slave owners were black at the start of the
What fraction of slaves were owned by black or white?
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in news:7it93k5ed5rp918tvoi2d1t3p47hd5o5da@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 20:55:18 -0000 (UTC), Baxtersome
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:rf393kdecu6le48efihhjk7pbtqf5o32j0@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:58:13 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in
news:q8b83k19v2bilhd1etokron7q75oge1p85@4ax.com:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 02:54:26 -0400, LeftistDon'tMatter
<IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 00:33:52 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:8hb73kpg61lbng7n98dl5it5hk0r9us5q4@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote in >>>>>>>>>> news:3ii63k9fhp53jkrh2ftsb55p1sahv98bj3@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:44 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:
Norman <norman@brewster.zom> wrote in
news:11f3e4cecc.1748146071 @fucne.rs:
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted
collegenotnews:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:no
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m76purFc1euU1 @mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness- >>>>>>>>>> inclusion-
ndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eligibility. there are sports where superior >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physicality is
Where is it an issue in Women's Pro sports? school andmaybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> competing against menMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender >>>>>>>>>>>>> pretenders cheating against normal women is your idea of >>>>>>>>>>>>> fairness?
performance.are for learning.
It's not right to cheat in high school and college athletics, >>>>>>>>>>> either. Scholarships are awarded based on athletic
to
And you're an Entitled White male who thinks you get to make the >>>>>>>>>> rules for others.
I haven't made any rules about women's sports
Yeah you have - but they're all in your head and nobody else has
havefollow them.
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation
womens-Education.more girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims >>>>>>>>>> that trans inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and >>>>>>>>>> baseless.
Even if that were true, what would be the point?
Kids sports, winning is not as important as learning.
Thank goodness the people are getting educated and the "trans"
fruitcakes are getting rejected.
https://fpiw.org/gallup-poll-shows-americans-dont-want-men-in-
11ef-bsp orts/
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_b6537968-dff2-
of27 4-9fbf7250bf7f.html
https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/nyt-poll-finds-almost-80-
men--a mericans-oppose-men-in-womens-sports/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/most-americans-oppose-allowing-
inin -womens-sports-trans-ing-kids-poll/ar-AA1xKdCY
===============
Fact Sheet: Transgender Participation in Sports
https://glaad.org/fact-sheet-for-reporters-transgender-participation-
against- sports/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=16386509738
&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIu_by4Li_jQMVNymtBh1-_yNTEAMYAiAAEgJmSfD_BwE
===========
Anti-suffragism was a political movement composed of both men and
women that began in the late 19th century in order to campaign
women's suffrage in countries such as Australia, Canada, Ireland, the >>>>> United Kingdom and the United States. To some extent, Anti-suffragism >>>>> was a Classical Conservative movement that sought to keep the status >>>>> quo for women. More American women organized against their own right >>>>> to vote than in favor of it, until 1916.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-suffragism
Glaad is a freaky media that talks about freaky people. I'm not
interested in their propaganda.
You hate education, you hate truth.
NO, I just think Glaad is garbage
You hate education, you hate truth.
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in news:p2p93k1ic6hicaor4e6km5i5gjpmb53gqt@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter wrote:
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have
more girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that >>>trans inclusion harms girls' sports are inaccurate and baseless.
You want to cite this alleged 'fact'?
https://glaad.org/fact-sheet-for-reporters-transgender-participation-in
- sports/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=16386509738 &gclid=EAIaIQobChMIu_by4Li_jQMVNymtBh1-_yNTEAMYAiAAEgJmSfD_BwE
leads to:
https://www.americanprogress.org/article/fair-play/
On 5/26/2025 5:15 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:the
On 26/5/25 14:12, hpotter wrote:
Nearly 40% of the Southern slave owners were black at the start of
What fraction of slaves were owned by black or white?
Did you only complete grade 2 math?
Ombudsman <jgoldberg@theatlantic.com> wrote in news:10181l8$q20$2 @toxic.dizum.net:
On 5/26/2025 5:15 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:the
On 26/5/25 14:12, hpotter wrote:
Nearly 40% of the Southern slave owners were black at the start of
What fraction of slaves were owned by black or white?
Did you only complete grade 2 math?
============
According to the Halliburton study:
There were about 3,775 black slaveholders in the U.S. at their
peak
in 1830, owning about 12,000 enslaved black people. This represents
about 1/2 of 1% of all enslaved people in the U.S. being owned by a
black slaveholder. This also represents about 1% of the free black
population at that time being slaveholders. (Lightner & Ragan put this percentage closer to 2% of the free black population.) Black
slaveholders represented about 0.003% (or 3/1000's of 1%) of the total
U.S. population in 1830.
Of them, about 42% owned one enslaved person, typically "owning"
either a spouse or a child. That is, a black person bought their
freedom from a slaveholder, then bought the freedom of a family
member. They generally did not pay to emancipate the person they
"bought" because it was expensive and the slave states made it
difficult. (In many states, you had to petition the state legislature,
or file suit at a local/county courthouse, who typically said no. For example, Lightner & Ragan say that, in the decade before 1830, the
state legislature of Alabama were granting between 10-20 manumission petitions per year.)
Of the 3,775 total black slaveholders, about half of them lived in cities. They were not engaged in agricultural or plantation work.
Also of them, about 67% of them lived in one of four states in
1830:
Maryland, Virginia, South Carolina, and Louisiana. No other state had
more than 110 total black slaveholders at that time.
Lightner and Ragan further clarify that, while there were
certainly
black slaveowners who were exploitative, the percentage of such
slaveowners was between 19%-27% of all black slaveowners, which
translates to about 1,000 total such slaveowners. But of them, these
1,000 individuals held about 2/3rds of all enslaved people held by
black slaveowners in 1830.
On Thu, 29 May 2025 03:15:10 -0000 (UTC), Baxter wrote:
Ombudsman <jgoldberg@theatlantic.com> wrote
On 5/26/2025 5:15 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 26/5/25 14:12, hpotter wrote:Did you only complete grade 2 math?
Nearly 40% of the Southern slave owners were black at the start ofthe war.
According to the Halliburton study:
There were about 3,775 black slaveholders in the U.S. at their peak
in 1830, owning about 12,000 enslaved black people. This represents about
1/2 of 1% of all enslaved people in the U.S. being owned by a black
slaveholder. This also represents about 1% of the free black population
at that time being slaveholders. (Lightner & Ragan put this percentage
closer to 2% of the free black population.) Black slaveholders
represented about 0.003% (or 3/1000's of 1%) of the total U.S. population
in 1830.
Of them, about 42% owned one enslaved person, typically "owning"
either a spouse or a child. That is, a black person bought their freedom >>from a slaveholder, then bought the freedom of a family member. They
generally did not pay to emancipate the person they "bought" because it
was expensive and the slave states made it difficult. (In many states,
you had to petition the state legislature, or file suit at a local/county
courthouse, who typically said no. For example, Lightner & Ragan say
that, in the decade before 1830, the state legislature of Alabama were
granting between 10-20 manumission petitions per year.)
Of the 3,775 total black slaveholders, about half of them lived in
cities. They were not engaged in agricultural or plantation work.
Also of them, about 67% of them lived in one of four states in 1830:
Maryland, Virginia, South Carolina, and Louisiana. No other state had
more than 110 total black slaveholders at that time.
Lightner and Ragan further clarify that, while there were certainly
black slaveowners who were exploitative, the percentage of such
slaveowners was between 19%-27% of all black slaveowners, which
translates to about 1,000 total such slaveowners. But of them, these
1,000 individuals held about 2/3rds of all enslaved people held by black
slaveowners in 1830.
Just so hpotter can understand bullshit doesn't pass anymore:
"There were about 3,775 black slaveholders in the U.S. at their peak
in 1830, owning about 12,000 enslaved black people. This represents
about 1/2 of 1% of all enslaved people in the U.S. being owned by a
black slaveholder. "
.5%
40%
Which number is believable?
Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in news:100voeo$1h0hf$1@dont- email.me:
On 24/5/25 21:08, Norman wrote:no
On 27 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2CE818671A8C629555@185.151.15.160:
Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in news:m76purFc1euU1
@mid.individual.net:
On 27/04/2025 11:06 pm, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Maximus<gladiator@colosseum.rome> wrote in
news:m75mriFc1evU2@mid.individual.net:
https://www.olympics.com/ioc/human-rights/fairness-inclusion >>>>>>>>>>>> -
notndi scr iminationexcept they allow sports governing bodies to decide
eligibility. there are sports where superior physicality is
maybe some women would feel a degree of intimidation competingMe, too!an advantage. eg. target shootingBingo! (No pun intended.)
  Why they have women's chess matches
and women's poker tournemonts is beyond
me.
against men
Women compete with men in every other
sphere of life (high school, college, work
environments, etc). That they demand any
sort of special privilege only feeds the
misgynistic notion they aren't really
equal after all.
they aren't equal physically
There is nothing physical about
the poker and chess tournements being
discussed.
The original scope of physically superior male gender pretenders
cheating against normal women is your idea of fairness?
Is it fair for women with genes for long bones to compete against
short bone women?
===========
Athletes come in all shapes and sizes including physical advantages
helpful to their sports, such as Michael Phelps’ long arms and Simone
Biles’ compact size that help them excel, yet those physical
attributes have never been used to restrict or ban their
participation. Being an athlete is also more than bodies – it is about courage, dedication, luck, talent, and most urgently, expanding access
and encouragement for all who want to play.
https://glaad.org/fact-sheet-for-reporters-transgender-participation-in
- sports/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=16386509738 &gclid=EAIaIQobChMIu_by4Li_jQMVNymtBh1-_yNTEAMYAiAAEgJmSfD_BwE
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in news:p2p93k1ic6hicaor4e6km5i5gjpmb53gqt@4ax.com:
On Sun, 25 May 2025 20:28:50 -0000 (UTC), Baxter wrote:
Fact:
Research shows states that include transgender participation have more >>>girls participating in sports than states with bans. Claims that trans >>>inclusion harms girls’ sports are inaccurate and baseless.
You want to cite this alleged 'fact'?
https://glaad.org/fact-sheet-for-reporters-transgender-participation-in- sports/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=16386509738 &gclid=EAIaIQobChMIu_by4Li_jQMVNymtBh1-_yNTEAMYAiAAEgJmSfD_BwE
leads to:
https://www.americanprogress.org/article/fair-play/
Poll Finds Most Parents, Including Catholics, Oppose Transgender Ideology
In Schools
On 1/6/25 18:05, Bob Seefreed wrote:
Poll Finds Most Parents, Including Catholics, Oppose Transgender Ideology
In Schools
What is 'Transgender Ideology'?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 31:01:08 |
| Calls: | 10,391 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,105 |
