• TRUMP VICTORY EXPLAINED: New Data Sheds More Light on Kamala Harris's 2

    From Stan@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 30 21:19:20 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics, alt.society.liberalism
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc

    Democrat data firm Catalist just released the most comprehensive report
    to date on how President Donald Trump won the 2024 election. But as
    usual, the corporate media and Democrat consultant class are misreading
    the data - and underestimating just how devastating last November was
    for liberals.

    Breaking down the data
    The Catalist report largely confirms what many exit polls found last
    year. Trump made gains among minority and young voters, too many Biden
    voters stayed home, and infrequent voters voted Republican. But the
    scale of these shifts and some other trends that have thus far flown
    under the radar hint at much deeper problems for Democrats than just one
    bad election night.

    Trump's gains among men - particularly minority men - were particularly astonishing. Among men overall, Trump performed six points better in
    2024 than he did in 2020. But among black men, he performed seven points better, and among Latino men, he improved by an incredible 12 points.
    Kamala Harris did not improve among a single subset of men examined in
    the Catalist survey.


    SOURCE: The Cook Political Report

    Even among women, Harris struggled. Latina women moved seven points to
    the right. The only group among whom Harris improved over Joe Biden's
    2020 performance was married white women - and even then, she did only
    one point better.

    In another troubling trend for liberals, the newest voters were less
    likely to vote Democrat. In 2024, for the first time in Catalist's
    dataset, the Democrat candidate won fewer than 50 percent of the voters
    for whom that election was their first time ever voting - a cohort of 24 million Americans last year.

    That data point alone should be setting off alarm bells for liberals. Typically, younger voters lean left and become more conservative as they
    age. If that trend holds but Republicans begin performing better with
    young people as soon as they're able to vote, it creates a prohibitively
    low electoral ceiling for Democrats.

    Perhaps the most important takeaway from the Catalist report is also the
    most nuanced. As the Cook Political Report explains, "For much of the
    2024 election, the Harris campaign was convinced that they could win if
    the electorate looked similar to 2020, while the Trump campaign was
    eager to expand the electorate."

    In a sense, Harris got the electorate she wanted - 47 percent of voters
    were "super voters," meaning they had voted in all of the last four
    general elections. In 2020, that number was 38 percent. And Harris
    actually performed better with this subset of voters than either Joe
    Biden in 2020 or Hillary Clinton in 2016, winning 50 percent of their
    votes.

    But among less frequent voters - those who voted in 0, 1, 2, or 3 of the
    last 4 general elections, Harris lost ground. While Biden won at least
    53 percent of the vote among all of these groups, Harris failed to crack
    50 percent with any of them.

    Moreover, according to Catalist's estimates, 30 million people who voted
    in 2020 stayed home in 2024. About 55.7 percent of that group voted for
    Biden.


    SOURCE: The Cook Political Report

    Key takeaways
    Taken together, these findings offer a few insights. First, Trump was
    indeed successful at expanding the electorate - and shattered
    conventional wisdom about minority voting patterns. Liberal dreams of an "emerging Democratic majority" driven by people of color and women, so
    popular in the early 2000s, are now coming crashing down. The 2024
    electorate, which was three percent less white than 12 years ago,
    produced the first Republican popular vote winner since 2004.

    Second, the gender divide is real and growing. The failure of the Kamala
    Harris campaign to reach men was not just a media narrative - it showed
    up in an enormous way at the ballot box. Since last November, Democrats
    have failed to reckon with their alienation of men and the aggressive feminization of the party. Unless Democrats address that problem
    quickly, expect the rightward trend among men to continue no matter who
    is on the ballot.

    Third, the Obama coalition is collapsing, and traditional Democrat
    messaging tactics are becoming less effective with voters. As Cook put
    it, "Had the 2024 electorate been in place in 2012, the team in Chicago would've been over the moon." But in 2016, 2020, and 2024, that same
    coalition that delivered two terms for Obama became increasingly
    pro-Trump - despite Democrats and the corporate media launching a
    decade-long smear campaign to portray Trump as racist and sexist.

    Fourth, Americans who are less political, or at least less inclined to
    vote, really, really didn't like what they saw from Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, and really did like Donald Trump's message. What the "less
    frequent" voter data suggests is that a majority of Americans who have
    not voted in every recent election were incentivized to show up at the
    polls to vote for a change in direction - a clear rejection of Biden's presidency.

    The media misses the mark again
    Following the release of the Catalist data, The Bulwark - a vehemently anti-Trump outlet - published its own breakdown of the data. It contains
    this somewhat amusing line: "Republicans were not able to boost their
    margins in the swing states in 2024 as much as they did nationally -
    meaning that in the states that actually matter, where all the ad
    spending and stumping happens, Democrats are in a stronger position than
    they are in the rest of the country. That's something."

    Really? Trump won every single swing state and cut his margin of defeat
    in half in states like Virginia and New Jersey. Maybe Trump didn't
    improve as much in the swing states as he did nationally, but that's
    only because his improvement nationally was so impressive. If anything,
    that analysis should lead to the conclusion that Trump's appeal is even
    broader and more robust than his popular vote victory or landslide
    Electoral College margin would suggest.

    The Bulwark then trots out a now-familiar line: that no other Republican
    will be able to match Trump's margins among rural and working-class
    voters. "Since Trump hijacked their political party, they've been
    shedding reliable college-educated suburban voters - along with most traditional Republican values and policies," the piece reads. "And while
    Trump is able to offset this loss with Saddam Hussein-level margins
    among working-class voters, especially in rural areas, there's no
    evidence a Republican who isn't Trump can conjure similar appeal with
    voters otherwise uninterested in politics."

    But wait - didn't The Bulwark and the rest of the Never-Trump crowd just
    get done telling us from 2021 to 2024 that Trump would be an electoral
    anchor on the party? Didn't they all blame him for Republicans' underperformance in 2022 and insist that January 6 and left-wing lawfare
    would make him unelectable? Now, however, we're supposed to believe that Republicans don't stand a chance without him on the ballot.

    Even if that analysis were correct, it would mean that another more "traditional" Republican candidate would be able to bring back those college-educated suburban voters who used to be a core component of the
    GOP coalition. And if that Republican candidate could maintain some
    subset of the rural and working-class base that Trump activated, it
    would leave him or her in a similarly strong electoral position.

    Ultimately, what drives the political elite crazy isn't just that Trump
    keeps winning - it's that he keeps proving them wrong. Again and again,
    they've declared him finished and out of step with the American public.
    Yet each time, he defies the odds, redraws the political map, and
    reshapes the electorate in ways they neither understand nor control.

    Trump didn't just win in 2024. He shattered long-held assumptions about
    voter behavior, media influence, and party loyalty. What Democrats and
    the media fail to realize, and what each new revelation about last
    November proves, is that the old playbook no longer works - and that the outsider the elites tried to cancel is now the defining figure of a new political era.

    https://amac.us/newsline/elections/trump-victory-explained-new-data-sheds -more-light-on-kamala-harriss-2024-collapse/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruz@21:1/5 to Stan on Fri May 30 14:52:28 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics, alt.society.liberalism
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc

    On 30/5/25 14:19, Stan wrote:
    the data - and underestimating just how devastating last November was
    for liberals.

    That was then. Many people have become upset since. The question
    coming up is whether they are upset enough to elect an
    overwhelming Democrat Congress. A large enough majority can
    remove idjt and any supreme court injustice.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ged@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 30 21:23:35 2025
    XPost: sac.politics, alt.society.liberalism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    PakiSTAN

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gregg@21:1/5 to Siri Cruz on Fri May 30 22:32:52 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics, alt.society.liberalism
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc

    Siri Cruz wrote:

    On 30/5/25 14:19, Stan wrote:
    the data - and underestimating just how devastating last November was
    for liberals.

    That was then. Many people have become upset since. The question
    coming up is whether they are upset enough to elect an
    overwhelming Democrat Congress. A large enough majority can
    remove idjt and any supreme court injustice.


    Everybody loves Trump. That's how it is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Gregg on Fri May 30 21:09:33 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics, alt.society.liberalism
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc

    Gregg wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    Siri Cruz wrote:

    On 30/5/25 14:19, Stan wrote:
    the data - and underestimating just how devastating last November was
    for liberals.

    That was then. Many people have become upset since. The question
    coming up is whether they are upset enough to elect an
    overwhelming Democrat Congress. A large enough majority can
    remove idjt and any supreme court injustice.

    Everybody loves Trump. That's how it is.

    :-D You funny man!

    --
    You speak of courage. Obviously you do not know the difference between
    courage and foolhardiness. Always it is the brave ones who die, the soldiers.
    -- Kor, the Klingon Commander, "Errand of Mercy",
    stardate 3201.7

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)