On 30/5/25 23:12, <Dunning-Kruger patient> wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard University?
We do if that is how Congress allocates the budget.
The power of the purse is with Congress not a president.
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard University?
Siri Cruz wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On 30/5/25 23:12, <Dunning-Kruger patient> wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard University?
We do if that is how Congress allocates the budget.
The power of the purse is with Congress not a president.
Bankrolling science and engineering research seems very reasonable for keeping
America at the forefront.
Sadly, America is chasing after the imaginary demons of a geriatric
crank.
Planet of the apes <enough.of.the@apes.usa> wrote in news:101e6kg$sg6$3@news.tambov.ru:
Harvard, a private institution, can do as it likes. There’s nothing
illegal about coddling extremists or pumping out credentialed
pseudointellectuals.
If Harvard only pumping out "pseudointellectuals"
why does he keep appointing them?
Harvard Alums Donald Trump Nominated To Serve in His Cabinet
Nov 18 2024 https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2024/11/18/harvard-alumni-trump-cabinet/
On 30/5/25 23:12, Planet of the apes wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard University?
We do if that is how Congress allocates the budget.
The power of the purse is with Congress not a president.
On 5/31/2025 6:05 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Planet of the apes <enough.of.the@apes.usa> wrote in
news:101e6kg$sg6$3@news.tambov.ru:
Harvard, a private institution, can do as it likes. There’s nothing >>> illegal about coddling extremists or pumping out credentialed
pseudointellectuals.
If Harvard only pumping out "pseudointellectuals"
why does he keep appointing them?
"connections" Even if they only do half his bidding, the connections
will see the main goals through.
Harvard Alums Donald Trump Nominated To Serve in His Cabinet
Nov 18 2024
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2024/11/18/harvard-alumni-trump-cabinet/
On 6/2/2025 8:25 PM, c186282 wrote:
On 6/2/25 8:34 AM, -hh wrote:
On 6/1/25 22:17, c186282 wrote:
The US govt does NOT have "a duty" to support Harvard in
any way or form. Support has been voluntary ... and indeed
maybe a little suspicious. Perhaps it NEVER should have
supported big colleges ?
On the flip, there IS a huge amount of sci/tech talent
at those universities. Some are important to defense
work and the future of American industry.
The problem is that it's hard to pick and choose WHO
and WHAT the govt will fund. TOO easy for it to take
on a partisan appearance. How to fund research on
better nuke reactors but NOT fund 'queer studies'
and pro-Hamas people ?
So, is there a generic fix ???
How about having open call on selected research topics, where all who
want to participate is free to submit detailed scientific proposals,
and the grant winners are selected amongst those which are submitted,
which were scored & ranked based on the quality & value of their
respective proposals by an independent panel of subject matter experts.
You know ... literally what the current system already is.
DOGE was invented to put some likely SENSIBLE [shrieking] people
into the loop.
The DOGEbags did nothing of the kind. They are all fucking morons. They identified *zero* "waste, fraud, abuse." Their *sole* aim was to slash programs that Musk and Trump don't like.
The DOGE people were NOT "morons" in the least -
mostly SENSIBLE people who can smell govt idiocy
and waste from 100 miles away. Need MORE of them.
Oh, there was a REASON Trump/Musk didn't like
those programs .........
On 5/30/2025 11:12 PM, Planet of the apes wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard
University?
Grants to Harvard are not "subsidies."
On MSNBC, David French argued that the Trump administration’s
defunding of Harvard is little more than “political retaliation.”
French is 100% right.
On 02 Jun 2025, Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> posted some news:%Wu%P.42581$x6q4.34487@fx46.iad:
On 5/30/2025 11:12 PM, Planet of the apes wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard
University?
Grants to Harvard are not "subsidies."
Grants to Harvard are currently used as renewable subsidies. That needs
to stop and Trump is putting the kibosh on.
On 02 Jun 2025, Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> posted some news:%Wu%P.42581$x6q4.34487@fx46.iad:
On 5/30/2025 11:12 PM, Planet of the apes wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard
University?
Grants to Harvard are not "subsidies."
Grants to Harvard are currently used as renewable subsidies.
On MSNBC, David French argued that the Trump administration’s
defunding of Harvard is little more than “political retaliation.”
French is 100% right.
French is a nut.
"Clave" <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> wrote in message news:%Wu%P.42581$x6q4.34487@fx46.iad...
On 5/30/2025 11:12 PM, Planet of the apes wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard
University?
Grants to Harvard are not "subsidies."
Great and since they are not subsidies according to you, there is no
reason to continue them much less offer them.
"Grants and subsidies are both forms of financial assistance provided
by governments or organizations,
but they differ in their purpose and how they are applied. Grants are typically one-time payments for
specific projects or initiatives, while subsidies aim to reduce the
cost of goods or services, encourage
production, or support specific industries."
On MSNBC, David French argued that the Trump administration’s
defunding of
Harvard is little more than “political retaliation.”
French is 100% right.
How can that be if, as according to you, they aren't subsides?
You can't have it both ways there bubba...
On 2/6/25 21:48, c186282 wrote:Including continuing to spend money on programs for which Congressional authorization had EXPIRED?
The DOGE people were NOT "morons" in the least -
mostly SENSIBLE people who can smell govt idiocy
and waste from 100 miles away. Need MORE of them.
Oh, there was a REASON Trump/Musk didn't like
those programs .........
Every fraud and abuse just so happen to be an agency enforcing laws Musk was violating. The fines of the enforcement were costing him money.
Siri Cruz wrote:
On 2/6/25 21:48, c186282 wrote:
The DOGE people were NOT "morons" in the least -
mostly SENSIBLE people who can smell govt idiocy
and waste from 100 miles away. Need MORE of them.
Oh, there was a REASON Trump/Musk didn't like
those programs .........
Every fraud and abuse just so happen to be an agency enforcing laws
Musk was violating. The fines of the enforcement were costing him money
Including continuing to spend money on programs for which Congressional authorization had EXPIRED?
On 6/3/2025 6:15 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Clave" <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> wrote in message news:
%Wu%P.42581$x6q4.34487@fx46.iad...
On 5/30/2025 11:12 PM, Planet of the apes wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard
University?
Grants to Harvard are not "subsidies."
Great and since they are not subsidies according to you
No, they aren't subsidies period, scooter; not just "according to me."
The grants are made, scooter, because in the opinion of the federal
officials making the grants, they serve some public purpose.
non sequitur, scooter. The fact that the funding cuts *are* political retaliation by the Orange Fat Fuck has no connection to the grants not
On MSNBC, David French argued that the Trump administration’s
defunding of Harvard is little more than “political
retaliation.”
French is 100% right.
How can that be if, as according to you, they aren't subsides?
being subsidies.
On 6/3/2025 7:14 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag and subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Siri Cruz wrote:
On 2/6/25 21:48, c186282 wrote:Including continuing to spend money on programs for which Congressional
The DOGE people were NOT "morons" in the least -
mostly SENSIBLE people who can smell govt idiocy
and waste from 100 miles away. Need MORE of them.
Oh, there was a REASON Trump/Musk didn't like
those programs .........
Every fraud and abuse just so happen to be an agency enforcing laws Musk was
violating. The fines of the enforcement were costing him money.
authorization had EXPIRED?
That didn't happen, you subhuman Nazi filth.
A voice of reason in the wilderness.
On 4/6/25 16:23, Alan Bond wrote:
On MSNBC, David French argued that the Trump administration’s >>>>>> defunding of
Harvard is little more than “political retaliation.â€
French is 100% right.
How can that be if, as [sic] according to you, they aren't
subsides?
They're not subsidies, scooter. "as" is superfluous, scooter.
I do not care. They are whatever Congress called them. Congress
giveth. All praise to Congress.
Jonathan David Ball wrote:
On 6/3/2025 7:14 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag and >> subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Siri Cruz wrote:
On 2/6/25 21:48, c186282 wrote:Including continuing to spend money on programs for which Congressional
The DOGE people were NOT "morons" in the least -
mostly SENSIBLE people who can smell govt idiocy
and waste from 100 miles away. Need MORE of them.
Oh, there was a REASON Trump/Musk didn't like
those programs .........
Every fraud and abuse just so happen to be an agency enforcing laws Musk was
violating. The fines of the enforcement were costing him money.
authorization had EXPIRED?
That didn't happen, you subhuman Nazi filth.
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/60580
On 6/3/25 19:18, P. Coonan wrote:
On 02 Jun 2025, Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> posted some
news:%Wu%P.42581$x6q4.34487@fx46.iad:
On 5/30/2025 11:12 PM, Planet of the apes wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard
University?
Grants to Harvard are not "subsidies."
Grants to Harvard are currently used as renewable subsidies. That
needs to stop and Trump is putting the kibosh on.
The grants going to Harvard are <$0.7B/year ... since that's too
expensive for you, reallocate the work to the private sector in the US National Labs ... because they employ PhDs & pay them well instead of graduate students figure it will increase their current $12B budget by
a at least 10% = $1.2B, or roughly twice as expensive.
Taxpayers for the win! Yay, you! /s
On 03 Jun 2025, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> posted some >news:101o0f6$b1m2$2@dont-email.me:better
On 6/3/25 19:18, P. Coonan wrote:
On 02 Jun 2025, Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> posted some
news:%Wu%P.42581$x6q4.34487@fx46.iad:
On 5/30/2025 11:12 PM, Planet of the apes wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard
University?
Grants to Harvard are not "subsidies."
Grants to Harvard are currently used as renewable subsidies. That
needs to stop and Trump is putting the kibosh on.
The grants going to Harvard are <$0.7B/year ... since that's too
expensive for you, reallocate the work to the private sector in the US
National Labs ... because they employ PhDs & pay them well instead of
graduate students figure it will increase their current $12B budget by
a at least 10% = $1.2B, or roughly twice as expensive.
Taxpayers for the win! Yay, you! /s
There are other colleges besides Harvard. Berkeley for all its leftward >leanings, would do a better job than Harvard hands down. Has done a
job than Harvard historically.
On 03 Jun 2025, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> posted some news:101o0f6$b1m2$2@dont-email.me:
On 6/3/25 19:18, P. Coonan wrote:
On 02 Jun 2025, Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> posted some
news:%Wu%P.42581$x6q4.34487@fx46.iad:
On 5/30/2025 11:12 PM, Planet of the apes wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard
University?
Grants to Harvard are not "subsidies."
Grants to Harvard are currently used as renewable subsidies. That
needs to stop and Trump is putting the kibosh on.
The grants going to Harvard are <$0.7B/year ... since that's too
expensive for you, reallocate the work to the private sector in the US
National Labs ... because they employ PhDs & pay them well instead of
graduate students figure it will increase their current $12B budget by
a at least 10% = $1.2B, or roughly twice as expensive.
Taxpayers for the win! Yay, you! /s
There are other colleges besides Harvard. Berkeley for all its leftward leanings, would do a better job than Harvard hands down. Has done a better job than Harvard historically.
On 2025-06-05, Billy Clubbs <BILCLU@hotmail.corn> wrote:
On 03 Jun 2025, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> posted some
news:101o0f6$b1m2$2@dont-email.me:
On 6/3/25 19:18, P. Coonan wrote:
On 02 Jun 2025, Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> posted some
news:%Wu%P.42581$x6q4.34487@fx46.iad:
On 5/30/2025 11:12 PM, Planet of the apes wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard
University?
Grants to Harvard are not "subsidies."
Grants to Harvard are currently used as renewable subsidies. That
needs to stop and Trump is putting the kibosh on.
The grants going to Harvard are <$0.7B/year ... since that's too
expensive for you, reallocate the work to the private sector in the US
National Labs ... because they employ PhDs & pay them well instead of
graduate students figure it will increase their current $12B budget by
a at least 10% = $1.2B, or roughly twice as expensive.
Taxpayers for the win! Yay, you! /s
There are other colleges besides Harvard. Berkeley for all its leftward
leanings, would do a better job than Harvard hands down. Has done a better >> job than Harvard historically.
Despite being totally leftwing, Berkeley is a very good college.
My cousin graduated from Berkeley and has had an excellent career soIn other words, your labeling of it as "totally leftwing" [sic] was complete bullshit.
far.
TBH, I was kind of surprised but the school focuses on education and leaves the political leanings to after school clubs and so forth.
On 6/5/2025 6:48 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2025-06-05, Billy Clubbs <BILCLU@hotmail.corn> wrote:
On 03 Jun 2025, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> posted some
news:101o0f6$b1m2$2@dont-email.me:
On 6/3/25 19:18, P. Coonan wrote:
On 02 Jun 2025, Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> posted
some news:%Wu%P.42581$x6q4.34487@fx46.iad:
On 5/30/2025 11:12 PM, Planet of the apes wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard
University?
Grants to Harvard are not "subsidies."
Grants to Harvard are currently used as renewable subsidies. That
needs to stop and Trump is putting the kibosh on.
The grants going to Harvard are <$0.7B/year ... since that's too
expensive for you, reallocate the work to the private sector in the
US National Labs ... because they employ PhDs & pay them well
instead of graduate students figure it will increase their current
$12B budget by a at least 10% = $1.2B, or roughly twice as
expensive.
Taxpayers for the win! Yay, you! /s
There are other colleges besides Harvard. Berkeley for all its
leftward leanings, would do a better job than Harvard hands down.
Has done a better job than Harvard historically.
Despite being totally leftwing, Berkeley is a very good college.
It is not "leftwing" [sic], and it's not a "college" — it's a
university.
My cousin graduated from Berkeley and has had an excellent career soIn other words, your labeling of it as "totally leftwing" [sic] was
far.
TBH, I was kind of surprised but the school focuses on education and
leaves the political leanings to after school clubs and so forth.
complete bullshit.
There is a famous maxim popularized by Stephen Colbert:
Blowjob is too stupid to realize his tell. What a fucking idiot!
On 6/5/2025 11:22 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly
obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 05 Jun 2025, Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> posted some
news:HHs0Q.543185$mjgd.381185@fx09.iad:
On 6/5/2025 6:48 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2025-06-05, Billy Clubbs <BILCLU@hotmail.corn> wrote:
On 03 Jun 2025, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> posted some
news:101o0f6$b1m2$2@dont-email.me:
On 6/3/25 19:18, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly
obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 02 Jun 2025, Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> posted >>>>>>> some news:%Wu%P.42581$x6q4.34487@fx46.iad:
On 5/30/2025 11:12 PM, Planet of the apes wrote:
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard
University?
Grants to Harvard are not "subsidies."
Grants to Harvard are currently used as renewable subsidies.
That needs to stop and Trump is putting the kibosh on.
The grants going to Harvard are <$0.7B/year ... since that's too
expensive for you, reallocate the work to the private sector in
the US National Labs ... because they employ PhDs & pay them well
instead of graduate students figure it will increase their
current $12B budget by a at least 10% = $1.2B, or roughly twice
as expensive.
Taxpayers for the win! Yay, you! /s
There are other colleges besides Harvard. Berkeley for all its
leftward leanings, would do a better job than Harvard hands down.
Has done a better job than Harvard historically.
Despite being totally leftwing, Berkeley is a very good college.
It is not "leftwing" [sic], and it's not a "college" ā€” it's a
university.
My cousin graduated from Berkeley and has had an excellent careerIn other words, your labeling of it as "totally leftwing" [sic] was
so far.
TBH, I was kind of surprised but the school focuses on education
and leaves the political leanings to after school clubs and so
forth.
complete bullshit.
There is a famous maxim popularized by Stephen Colbert:
Colbert is
my intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical
superior. He's 5'1" — taller than me.
Reality has a liberal bias. This is settled.
On 6/4/2025 6:33 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag and subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Jonathan David Ball wrote:
No such poster, as Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag and subhuman Nazi filth, well knows.
On 6/3/2025 7:14 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag and >>> subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Siri Cruz wrote:
On 2/6/25 21:48, c186282 wrote:Including continuing to spend money on programs for which Congressional >>>> authorization had EXPIRED?
The DOGE people were NOT "morons" in the least -
mostly SENSIBLE people who can smell govt idiocy
and waste from 100 miles away. Need MORE of them.
Oh, there was a REASON Trump/Musk didn't like
those programs .........
Every fraud and abuse just so happen to be an agency enforcing laws Musk >>>>> was violating. The fines of the enforcement were costing him money.
That didn't happen, you subhuman Nazi filth.
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/60580
Muskmelon and the DOGEbags found *no* money spent for any "expired authorization," Anony-Mouse, you *fat* subhuman Nazi filth.
Get your affairs in order, bitch. Your expiration is approaching fast.
Jonathan David Ball wrote:
On 6/4/2025 6:33 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking
shitbag and subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Jonathan David Ball wrote:
No such poster, as Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag
and subhuman Nazi filth, well knows.
On 6/3/2025 7:14 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking
shitbag and subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Siri Cruz wrote:
On 2/6/25 21:48, c186282 wrote:Including continuing to spend money on programs for which
The DOGE people were NOT "morons" in the least -
mostly SENSIBLE people who can smell govt idiocy
and waste from 100 miles away. Need MORE of them.
Oh, there was a REASON Trump/Musk didn't like
those programs .........
Every fraud and abuse just so happen to be an agency enforcing
laws Musk was violating. The fines of the enforcement were costing >>>>>> him money.
Congressional
authorization had EXPIRED?
That didn't happen, you subhuman Nazi filth.
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/60580
Muskmelon and the DOGEbags found *no* money spent for any "expired
authorization," Anony-Mouse, you *fat* subhuman Nazi filth.
The CBO, however, did.
Get your affairs in order, bitch. Your expiration is approaching fast.
Okay, Boomer.
Will it be a mestizo or a black who suffocates you with a pillow in your nursing home?
Ah ... more NAZIs ........
Will it be a mestizo or a black who suffocates you with a pillow in your >nursing home?
Colbert is a 4'9" 90-left knuckle-dragger. Even the communists dispise
him.
Do taxpayers have a constitutional duty to bankroll Harvard University?
Jonathan David Ball wrote:
On 6/4/2025 6:33 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag and >> subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Jonathan David Ball wrote:
No such poster, as Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag and
subhuman Nazi filth, well knows.
On 6/3/2025 7:14 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag and
subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Siri Cruz wrote:
On 2/6/25 21:48, c186282 wrote:
The DOGE people were NOT "morons" in the least -
mostly SENSIBLE people who can smell govt idiocy
and waste from 100 miles away. Need MORE of them.
Oh, there was a REASON Trump/Musk didn't like
those programs .........
Every fraud and abuse just so happen to be an agency enforcing laws Musk >>>>>> was violating. The fines of the enforcement were costing him money. >>>>> Including continuing to spend money on programs for which Congressional >>>>> authorization had EXPIRED?
That didn't happen, you subhuman Nazi filth.
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/60580
Muskmelon and the DOGEbags found *no* money spent for any "expired
authorization," Anony-Mouse, you *fat* subhuman Nazi filth.
The CBO, however, did.
Get your affairs in order, bitch. Your expiration is approaching fast.
Okay, Boomer.
Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 6/6/2025 8:44 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksuckingno one is older than you
shitbag and subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Jonathan David Ball wrote:
No such poster, as Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking shitbag
and subhuman Nazi filth, well knows.
On 6/4/2025 6:33 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking
shitbag and subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Jonathan David Ball wrote:
No such poster, as Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking
shitbag and subhuman Nazi filth, well knows.
On 6/3/2025 7:14 PM, Anony-Mouse, the squat-to-piss cocksucking
shitbag and subhuman Nazi filth, lied:
Siri Cruz wrote:
On 2/6/25 21:48, c186282 wrote:Including continuing to spend money on programs for which
The DOGE people were NOT "morons" in the least -
mostly SENSIBLE people who can smell govt idiocy
and waste from 100 miles away. Need MORE of them.
Oh, there was a REASON Trump/Musk didn't like
those programs .........
Every fraud and abuse just so happen to be an agency enforcing >>>>>>>> laws Musk was violating. The fines of the enforcement were
costing him money.
Congressional
authorization had EXPIRED?
That didn't happen, you subhuman Nazi filth.
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/60580
Muskmelon and the DOGEbags found *no* money spent for any "expired
authorization," Anony-Mouse, you *fat* subhuman Nazi filth.
The CBO, however, did.
No, you subhuman Nazi filth, it did not.
Get your affairs in order, bitch. Your expiration is approaching fast.
Okay, Boomer.
You're older than I am, you subhuman Nazi filth.
Anonymous wrote:
Will it be a mestizo or a black who suffocates you with a pillow in your
nursing home?
Niggers will assfuck you before they end your life. Watch your back boy.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 498 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 60:15:10 |
| Calls: | 9,812 |
| Files: | 13,754 |
| Messages: | 6,191,133 |